[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 153 (2007), Part 7]
[House]
[Pages 9376-9378]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1495, WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT 
                              ACT OF 2007

  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I 
call up House Resolution 319 and ask for its immediate consideration.
  The Clerk read the resolution, as follows:

                              H. Res. 319

       Resolved,  That at any time after the adoption of this 
     resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 
     XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 
     Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 
     the bill (H.R. 1495) to provide for the conservation and 
     development of water and related resources, to authorize the 
     Secretary of the Army to construct various projects for 
     improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, and 
     for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
     dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 
     the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
     of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
     shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by 
     the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the 
     bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
     rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill 
     for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
     amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now printed in 
     the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a 
     substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 
     against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 
     are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 
     XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to 
     the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall 
     be in order except those printed in the report of the 
     Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
     amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 
     report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 
     report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 
     the time specified in the report equally divided and 
     controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
     subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand 
     for division of the question in the House or in the Committee 
     of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are 
     waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 
     At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment 
     the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
     with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
     demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted 
     in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
     amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
     question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
     amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
     motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
     instructions.
       Sec. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 1495 
     pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 
     the previous question, the Chair may postpone further 
     consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated 
     by the Speaker.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Snyder). The gentlewoman from California 
(Ms. Matsui) is recognized for 1 hour.


                             General Leave

  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks 
and to insert extraneous materials into the Record.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentlewoman from California?
  There was no objection.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30 
minutes to the gentleman from Washington (Mr. Hastings). During 
consideration of this resolution, all time yielded is for the purpose 
of debate only.

                              {time}  1030

  Mr. Speaker, this rule permits the House to consider the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2007.
  The structured rule makes in order six amendments. As yesterday's 
debate in the Rules Committee demonstrated, Members on both sides of 
the aisle are focused on getting this bill to conference and onto the 
President's desk, and this rule reflects that consensus.
  Mr. Speaker, it has been well documented that our country has not had 
a WRDA bill in over 7 years. Seven years is perilously close to an 
entire generation passing without a national water resources policy 
being signed into law by a President.
  The bill made in order under this rule authorizes nearly $14 billion 
for the construction of more than 700 water resources development 
projects and studies by the Army Corps of Engineers for flood control, 
navigation, and environmental restoration.
  Additionally, H.R. 1495 authorizes hurricane recovery activities 
along the gulf coast that would cost an estimated $3 billion. 
Furthermore, the bill requires an external peer review for studies of 
projects that would cost more than $50 million. The bill also 
coordinates environmental analyses and other permit processes among 
Federal and State agencies and authorizes environmental quality 
initiatives. In short, this bill today moves our country forward.
  In my district of Sacramento, California, this WRDA bill is one of 
the most important pieces of legislation that will pass Congress this 
year. We have been waiting a long time for this bill. Sacramento is the 
most at-risk river city in this country for catastrophic flooding. 
Located at the confluence of the great Sacramento and American Rivers, 
the Sacramento floodplain contains over 165,000 homes, over 488,000 
residents, 1,300 government facilities including the State capital, and 
businesses providing 200,000 jobs. It is the hub of a six-county 
regional economy that provides 800,000 jobs for 1.5 million people.
  A major flood along the American River or the Sacramento River would 
cripple this economy, and cost upwards of $35 billion in direct 
property damages and likely result in a significant loss of life.
  Sacramento has had major floods throughout its history, the last 
major floods being in 1986 and 1997. We live with a constant threat of 
catastrophic flooding. In my district, we understand the need and 
urgency for an overarching water resources policy to protect our homes, 
businesses, and families. This bill, the projects and policies it 
contains, goes a long way in addressing my district and our country's 
flood vulnerabilities.
  Nationally, regions across the country are starving for a Federal 
partner in water resources policy. Our country is confronted with 
population growth, climate change and growing demands on our water 
infrastructure. Our districts across this country need this bill, and 
the Members in this Chamber have repeatedly supported WRDA bills.
  In the 108th Congress, WRDA passed the House by a vote of 412-8. In 
the 109th Congress, WRDA passed the House 406-14. There is a strong 
history of support and bipartisanship for WRDA bills. It is my hope 
that this

[[Page 9377]]

support continues and that we will move forward on this very important 
work.
  I also want to congratulate and thank Water Resources and Environment 
Subcommittee Chair, Eddie Bernice Johnson, and the full committee 
chairman, Jim Oberstar, for their commitment to make this bill a 
priority in the 110th Congress.
  I strongly urge my colleagues to support this rule and final passage 
of the underlying Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the 
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Matsui) for yielding me the customary 
30 minutes, and I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, in the 107th, 108th, and the 109th Congresses, the House 
considered and passed legislation to provide for conservation and 
development of water and related resources, and to authorize the 
construction of various projects in order to improve rivers and harbors 
in the United States.
  Unfortunately, differences could not be resolved with the other body, 
and these bipartisan bills, therefore, did not become law. The 
legislation before us today mirrors legislation that was approved by an 
overwhelming bipartisan majority of the House in the last Congress, and 
I am confident it will enjoy large bipartisan support today.
  Mr. Speaker, our Nation's water resource infrastructure is critical 
to our economy, transportation system, power generation, flood control 
and environmental protection and restoration. This is especially true 
in my area in the Pacific Northwest. Our region's major river, the 
Columbia River and its tributaries, is a great resource, one that must 
be well managed and protected.
  Hydroelectric dams provide clean, low-cost, renewable power. These 
facilities also provide a system of locks that allow for the efficient 
transportation of tons of agricultural products to coastal ports, which 
reduces congestion on our highways and our rail systems.
  The coastal ports that receive the river-barged goods and products 
are the gateways to overseas markets and also need careful attention. 
The success of farmers and manufacturers throughout the Pacific 
Northwest depend on these ports being navigable and appropriately 
maintained.
  Mr. Speaker, there are several provisions in the Water Resources 
Development Act that are important to individuals and communities that 
I represent in central Washington, and I would like to highlight those 
provisions.
  Like the WRDA bill passed by the House in the last Congress, I am 
particularly pleased that the committee has included language in the 
manager's amendment to permit Corps of Engineer employees working at 
dams in the Pacific Northwest to participate in wage surveys that are 
conducted to determine their rate of pay. This important provision 
would allow these employees the same participation allowed to similar 
employees at dams in the region operated by the Bonneville Power 
Administration and the Bureau of Reclamation. This is a matter of fair 
and equal treatment, and I appreciate the committee agreeing with my 
request on this matter.
  This bill also includes language that would allow the Corps to 
officially give credit to the Port of Sunnyside for funding it has 
invested to maintain progress on its wetland restoration and wastewater 
treatment project. This project is a creative initiative by the Port of 
Sunnyside to improve river habitat in the Yakima River, and provide for 
greater economic growth in the local community. This provision ensures 
that the Port of Sunnyside gets proper credit for funds it invested as 
it works with the Corps to make this project a reality.
  Finally, this legislation lifts Corps restrictions on the development 
of several Port of Pasco properties. I am very hopeful that elimination 
of these flowage easements will allow beneficial uses of this prime 
riverfront property to move forward for the betterment of Pasco and the 
Tri-Cities.
  Mr. Speaker, we must keep our commitment to sustain and enhance our 
Nation's water resource infrastructure, and that requires a regular 
review and updating of congressional direction to the Corps of 
Engineers to ensure that existing projects are maintained and that new 
needs are met.
  I am hopeful that this necessary legislation will soon become law.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, I yield 8 minutes to the gentleman from 
Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer).
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the gentlelady's courtesy 
in permitting me to speak on this rule and on this bill.
  I further appreciate what this represents. It has been my privilege 
to serve for the last 10 years on the Water Resources Subcommittee for 
Transportation and Infrastructure. Over that period of time, I have 
watched as we have focused legislation to deal with the amazing needs 
that face water resources around the country.
  Unfortunately, the legislation that we have passed through this House 
with strong support in recent Congresses has never been able to find 
its way into law. I think that with this legislation, we are able to 
find a way to help break the impasse.
  I would like to speak to one of the elements that was in that 
legislation that has been made in order by the Rules Committee, an 
amendment that I am offering along with my colleagues Peter Welch and 
Tom Petri to help bring the Corps of Engineers into the 21st century by 
updating the principles and guidelines under which it operates.
  Our amendment takes a step back from the politics and controversies 
that have surrounded the Corps' activities over recent years. In fact, 
there has been some finger-pointing at the Corps, but frankly, Congress 
itself is part of the problem and can be part of a process that can 
help move this forward.
  These principles and guidelines are used for the formulation, 
evaluation, and implementation of water resources projects. The current 
rules under which the Corps operates have not been updated since 1983. 
It seems hard to believe, given how important water resources are and 
how much we have learned about the science, about hydrology since 1983.
  Think about it for a moment. In 1983, Ronald Reagan was President. We 
were dealing with the movie ``Return of the Jedi.'' A year later, the 
3.5-inch floppy disk was introduced, and IBM was soon to launch the 
first portable computer which weighed 30 pounds. Half the people who 
work for me in my congressional office weren't even born in 1983.
  Every Member of the House is aware how much has changed since 1983 in 
terms of technology, science, environmental policy, our national 
priorities, and our understanding of water resources. Yet, the Corps of 
Engineers and the thousands of dedicated men and women who work for 
them have a planning process that has not kept up.
  It was my privilege with the former head of the Corps, General 
Flowers, to meet with representatives of all of the planning agencies 
for the Corps across the country. They understand the problems; they 
are striving to make some adjustments. We are still developing 
projects, yet they are still working under an umbrella that was based 
on principles and guidelines when James Watt was Secretary of the 
Interior.
  This amendment is very simple. It directs the Secretary of the Army 
to update the principles and guidelines in consultation with all the 
other Federal agencies that have a stake in the process, to work with 
the public to deal with what we have learned over the last quarter of a 
century.
  This is a very important step on addressing criticisms from the 
National Academy of Sciences, the OMB, the Government Accountability 
Office, and others. It does not impact any project that currently is 
approved or under way, none of the projects that are listed in the bill 
we have before us, but it is going to help us change the process to get 
at the root of a long-term problem.
  Passing the amendment will not delay any projects or tie the hands of

[[Page 9378]]

the Corps in any way. In fact, I am convinced that it will break the 
paralysis for projects in the future by making sure they are 
structurally, fiscally, and environmentally sound.
  There are some projects around the country that have been delayed in 
recent years due not just to funding, although that is a serious issue, 
but due to lawsuits and other controversy. The ones that I have looked 
at that have met bumps in the road were in this situation in the main 
because they weren't properly planned and ground-truthed, as they say; 
and they have stirred up unnecessary controversy in some instances.
  This amendment will make it easier to approve and construct good 
projects in the future. This amendment will make it easier for the 
House and the Senate, which in the past have been at loggerheads over 
principles of Corps reform. I think this is an area of common ground 
that will bring people together. This amendment represents a fresh 
break. It won't solve all of the problems of the Corps, that will await 
another day; but with this amendment, it gives us a chance at a new 
beginning for Congress to be positively involved in these issues.
  We start by equipping the Corps with the latest science and analytic 
tools to bring them into the 21st century rather than tying their hands 
with out-of-date policies.
  I strongly urge that each of my colleagues join with me in supporting 
our amendment, which is endorsed by Clean Water Action, Taxpayers for 
Commonsense, Republicans for Environmental Protection, the National 
Audubon Society, Friends of the Earth, American Rivers, the National 
Wildlife Federation, Environmental Defense, the League of Conservation 
Voters, the American Society of Civil Engineers, the people who are 
charged with making these projects work.
  I deeply appreciate the progress that this represents in bringing us 
forward. I appreciate the Rules Committee making it in order, and look 
forward to being able to carry this amendment to the floor, hopefully 
for its approval, and being able to break the impasse surrounding water 
resources projects.
  In the aftermath of the tragedy we saw with Hurricane Katrina, with 
the flooding that has occurred in the Northeast just in recent days, 
this legislation is more important than ever.

                              {time}  1045

  Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I have no more requests for 
time. I yield back the balance of my time.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that, during consideration of 
H.R. 1495 pursuant to House Resolution 319, amendment No. 1 printed in 
House Report 110-100 be modified by the modification I have placed at 
the desk.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the modification.
  The Clerk read as follows:

       Modification to amendment No. 1 printed in House Report 
     110-100:
  Strike the portion of the amendment proposing to insert section 5024.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentlewoman from California?
  Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. Speaker, reserving the right to 
object, I would just yield to my friend from California for an 
explanation on this.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, there is a Washington, D.C. aqueduct project 
that inadvertently violates PAYGO. This modification strikes the 
provision from the bill.
  Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. So it takes that provision that violates 
the PAYGO from the bill?
  Ms. MATSUI. It inadvertently violates, so we struck it out.
  Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. Speaker, I withdraw my objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without objection, the modification is 
accepted.
  There was no objection.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, this bill is long overdue. Our country needs 
a comprehensive water resources policy, and WRDA is the framework that 
can meet this need. We have 7 years of backlogged water projects that 
must be addressed. There is a growing demand on our already 
overburdened water infrastructure. The sooner we move forward on this 
bill, the sooner our communities across the country will be healthier 
and safer.
  I urge a ``yes'' vote on the previous question and on the rule.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time, and I move the 
previous question on the resolution.
  The previous question was ordered.
  The resolution was agreed to.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________