[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 153 (2007), Part 6]
[Senate]
[Pages 8704-8705]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




          STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

      By Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. Stevens):
  S. 1089. A bill to amend the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act to allow 
the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects 
to hire employees more efficiently, and for other purposes; to the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
  Ms. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, I rise today to introduce legislation 
that should allow the entity we created just 2\1/2\ years ago to 
oversee and expedite construction of a gas line to bring Alaska's huge 
reserves of natural gas to markets in the lower 48 States to work 
better and function more smoothly and quickly.
  I, and Senator Ted Stevens who is co-sponsoring this legislation, are 
introducing this bill in an effort to help speed the full functioning 
of the Office of Pipeline Coordinator, the entity that we created in 
fall 2004 to oversee the permitting, design and then construction of an 
Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline project, intended to bring Alaska's 
reserves of gas to a Nation in need of additional natural gas supplies.
  In 2004 we passed two sets of provisions. The first in that year's 
Military Construction Appropriations Act, H.R. 4837, P.L. 108-324/15 
U.S.C. 720, set up an Office of Federal Pipeline Coordinator to oversee 
the 15 Federal agencies that will have a role to play in construction 
and financing of a pipeline system. The bill also set up a streamlined 
permitting and expedited court review process to limit unnecessary 
delays in the project--and hopefully prevent costly delays from driving 
up the project's price. That bill also included an $18 billion Federal 
loan guarantee. The second of that year's pipeline related bills, the 
FSC-ETI Act (H.R. 4520/P.L. 108-357) provided the Federal financial 
incentives expected to be needed to aid financing of the project. They 
included a tax credit for the cost of the pipe in Alaska and a tax 
credit for the cost of construction of an Alaskan North Slope gas 
conditioning plant. The two credits were believed to produce about 
three-quarters of a billion dollars of benefit to the project.
  The project itself involves building a system, either an overland 
pipeline through Canada or a pipeline through Alaska leading to a 
natural gas liquefication facility at tidewater in Alaska, to move gas 
to markets in the lower 48 States. Alaska has 35 trillion cubic feet of 
known gas in the Prudhoe Bay oil field and likely holds another 150 to 
200 trillion cubic feet of gas both on and offshore in northern Alaska. 
Getting that gas to market would help to meet a likely gas shortage in 
the lower 48 States within a decade, helping to keep the United States 
from becoming even more dependent on imported LNG from foreign 
suppliers.
  Currently Alaska's new Governor is in the process of calling for 
proposals from gas producers, pipeline companies and others interested 
in building the project, one currently estimated to cost between $30 
billion and about half that amount--depending on whether the line 
through Canada or an LNG project is deemed most economic.
  Congress last year funded the creation of the Federal Coordinator's 
office to begin the process of bringing Federal and State agencies 
together to oversee the permitting, design, and construction of a 
pipeline. The Office of the Federal Coordinator was funded for fiscal 
year 2007 initially with a $403,000 transfer of funds from the 
Department of Energy, with perhaps another $450,000 to $500,000 soon to 
be transferred. A coordinator, Alaskan former State Senate President 
Drue Pearce, was also named, confirmed and is now at work, and the 
office has reached an agreement with all of the 15 Federal agencies it 
will oversee on how a pipeline is to be permitted.
  The Bush administration has proposed $2.3 million in its fiscal year 
2008 budget request to better fund the Coordinator's Office. But 
development of the office has shown three problems that need corrective 
action by Congress, the first immediately.
  First, the 2004 act made the Coordinator follow Federal personnel 
law, specifically Title 5 that is a slow and cumbersome personnel 
process. This bill grants a waiver to Title 5 hiring procedures so that 
the Federal Coordinator can hire and fire her staff, based on their 
competence. That should cut the time needed to staff the office with 
experts in pipeline construction by 6 to 9 months. Given how important 
it is that the agency has specialists quickly to assist the State of 
Alaska in its efforts to select a pipeline builder, passing legislation 
to speed the hiring of Office staff is vital.
  The waiver, also is common practice for smaller Federal agencies as a 
host of agencies, from the Election Assistance Commission to the 
Vietnam Education Foundation, enjoy the hiring waiver.
  Second, the bill gives the coordinator the ability to establish 
reasonable permit filing and service fees and charges to defray the 
cost of regulating and the oversight of any pipeline project. While the 
proposed budget may pay for a half dozen to a dozen employees, nearly 
400 were employed in oversight of construction of the Trans-Alaska Oil 
Pipeline, some 30 years ago. The bill copies the structure that is 
currently employed by the Bureau of Land Management's oil and gas 
leasing division, FLP&MA Section 304, so that it follows a known 
process in allowing the Federal Coordinator to set and collect fees.
  Third, the bill in its Section 2 clarifies part of the original 2004 
act's Section 107. That section set up an expedited review process so 
that any suit concerning the pipeline under its enabling legislation or 
concerning its compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act 
would go first to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit. All 
cases would have to be filed within 60 days of an action and the court 
would have to ``expedite'' decisions on all such cases. This action 
simply also adds that suits stemming from the pipeline's permitting or 
construction that relates to the Administrative Procedures Act, the 
Endangered Species Act, and the National Historic Preservation Act, 
besides NEPA, would also go to the D.C. Circuit for expedited review. 
It clearly follows the original intent of the 2004 act, but does not 
limit litigation unfairly.
  The goal of this legislation, if it can be approved quickly by this 
Congress, would be to help the Pipeline Coordinator staff her office 
more quickly and then to provide the office the possibility of a more 
readily available source of funding, should a pipeline applicant move 
to proceed: The bill also will clarify the legal process for review of 
a pipeline, helping to speed the project and reduce the chances for 
cost overruns in construction of potentially the largest private 
capital construction project in the world's history.
  This is a vital project. It has the ability to move from 4.5 to 6 
billion cubic feet of gas a day, about 5 percent of the Nation's total 
gas needs in 2018--the first year the pipeline could go into service, 
if a final overland project was selected and proposed within the next 
year. It would likely produce about a third of that initially, if an 
LNG project was selected to be built.
  This should not be a controversial measure. It should have no 
nonappropriated costs involved in carrying out its provisions. Section 
2 of the bill will save the Nation untold millions of dollars in 
overseeing permitting and construction of a pipeline, once a firm 
project is selected. Some will say that the bill is not needed since 
the State of Alaska has yet to reach final agreement with Alaska North 
Slope gas producers on a firm agreement to build a line. I would argue, 
however, that this bill needs to pass now to provide additional 
assistance to help the State hammer out such an agreement and so the 
regulatory process is clearly in place, once such an agreement is 
reached. The Coordinator's Office is already involved in a host of 
discussions and actions relating to a pipeline and the pace is likely 
to quicken in coming months, provided the office has the expertise it 
needs to provide technical information to further a project.

[[Page 8705]]

  I hope the Senate and the Congress will review and approve this bill 
quickly.
  The Alaska gas line project is too important for this Nation's energy 
future, for our energy security, for our national security and for our 
balance of payments deficit for it to be delayed needlessly. These 
changes will likely speed the process of proceeding with a pipeline.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. Domenici):
  S. 1090. A bill to amend the Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act 
of 1973 to assist the neediest of senior citizens by modifying the 
eligibility criteria for supplemental foods provided under the 
commodity supplemental food program to take into account the 
extraordinarily high out-of-pocket medical expenses that senior 
citizens pay, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Agriculture, 
Nutrition, and Forestry.
  Ms. STABENOW. Mr. President, I rise today to introduce the Senior 
Nutrition Act, which will make needed improvements to the Commodity 
Supplemental Food Program to prevent our seniors from having to make 
the terrible choice between food and medicine as they try to balance 
their budgets.
  I am pleased to have the support of my friend, Senator Domenici of 
New Mexico, who has been one of the Senate's strongest supporters of 
CSFP.
  Nationally, 32 States and the District of Columbia participate in 
CSFP, which works to improve the health of both women with children and 
seniors by supplementing their diets with nutritious USDA commodity 
foods. According to USDA, nearly half a million people each month 
participated in CSFP during fiscal year 2006, with the overwhelming 
majority being seniors.
  My State of Michigan has one of the largest and oldest CSFP network 
in the Nation. Last year, over 80,000 people in Michigan benefited from 
this important program.
  The bill I am introducing today will make the following important 
changes to CSFP.
  First, categorical eligibility is granted for seniors for CSFP if the 
individual participates or is eligible to participate in the Food Stamp 
Program. No further verification of income would be necessary in such 
cases. The Food Stamp Program provides a medical expense deduction, 
which seniors may use to account for their high prescription drug 
costs.
  Second, this bill says that the same income standard that is 
currently used to determine eligibility for women, infants and children 
in CSFP 185 percent of the Poverty Income Guidelines--would be applied 
to seniors as well. The current income eligibility standard for seniors 
has been capped at just 130 percent. Under the current Federal poverty 
guidelines, a single senior cannot earn more than $13,273 per year to 
qualify. By raising the standard to 185 percent of poverty, the same 
senior can earn as much as $18,888 to qualify for food. This will make 
a major difference in the lives of so many seniors who are struggling 
with the high cost of prescription drugs.
  This bill has been endorsed by the National CSFP Association and 
America's Second Harvest. I ask unanimous consent that a copy of these 
support letters be printed in the Record following my remarks.
  There being no objection, the letters were ordered to be printed in 
the Record, as follows:


                                    National CSFP Association,

                                                   March 19, 2007.
     Hon. Debbie Stabenow
     U.S. Senate,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Senator Stabenow: Thank you for your continuing 
     support of the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP) 
     which provides an important buffer for our vulnerable 
     children and seniors each month. Your support has made a 
     tremendous difference and we appreciate your tireless 
     efforts.
       The National CSFP Association strongly supports your 
     efforts to re-introduce and pass the Senior Nutrition Act and 
     will work diligently to see that it happens this year. As you 
     know, 91% of our recipients are now seniors living below 130% 
     of Federal Poverty Level. For a household of one, this is 
     only a maximum of $1,062 per month. While some changes have 
     been made in Medicare to help seniors buy prescriptions, the 
     rising medical and fuel costs are still of great concern to 
     those on fixed incomes and many of those seniors qualifying 
     for food stamps due to medical cost deductions will lose the 
     deductions to income and subsequently their food stamps.
       By amending the eligibility criteria for seniors served by 
     CSFP through the Senior Nutrition Act, the neediest of 
     seniors will continue to receive nutrition assistance, which 
     is crucial if they are to remain in good health.
       Again, thank you for championing the causes of our nation's 
     elderly.
           Sincerely,
                                                      Frank Kubik,
     President.
                                  ____

                                         America's Second Harvest,


                               The Nation's Food Bank Network,

                                                   March 27, 2007.
     Hon. Debbie Stabenow,
     U.S. Senate,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Senator Stabenow: I am writing on behalf of the more 
     than 200 food banks and approximately 50,000 emergency 
     feeding organizations that are part of America's Second 
     Harvest--The Nation's Food Bank Network, to thank you for 
     your continuing support for the Commodity Supplemental Food 
     Program (CSFP) and your persistent efforts to improve the 
     nutrition and health of millions of this nation's elderly.
       With approximately 27 percent of our food bank members 
     distributing nutritious food boxes through the CSFP, we know 
     how very necessary it is to expand this program so that it 
     can reach more of the nation's needy seniors. Strengthening 
     the nutrition safety net for older Americans is a matter of 
     paramount importance as this population grows and ages.
       We strongly endorse the Senior Nutrition Act and support 
     your and Senator Domenici's effort to expand the number of 
     elderly eligible for the program by broadening the income 
     eligibility standards and permitting categorical eligibility 
     for seniors who participate in or are eligible to participate 
     in the Food Stamp Program.
       As you know, the CSFP provides critical nutrients to 
     supplement the diets of thousands of low-income elderly who 
     could not replace this food at the same low price as that 
     provided by the CSFP food package. Moreover, as you are 
     aware, this program also helps to support our nation's 
     farmers who grow the food that feeds this needy population, 
     along with millions of others who depend on our country's 
     food and nutrition programs.
       We are very grateful for your efforts to expand eligibility 
     for this important program and for the contribution you have 
     always made in waging the war against hunger in America. 
     Thank you very much.
       Sincerely,
                                                    Vicki Escarra,
     President and CEO.

                          ____________________