[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 153 (2007), Part 6]
[Senate]
[Pages 8321-8323]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                      KOREAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

  Ms. STABENOW. Mr. President, I rise today to urge the Bush 
administration to look beyond the next 48 hours. Right now, in Seoul, 
Korea, U.S. negotiators are meeting nonstop with South Korean officials 
to finish up the so-called Korean Free Trade Agreement. They are 
rushing because if they don't finish it by Saturday night at midnight, 
the trade agreement would not be eligible for fast-track authority. My 
colleagues understand what that means. They would not be eligible to 
move it through in a way that would not allow us to change the 
agreement in any way but puts it on fast-track authority so that if 
many of us believe there are concerns with it, we would not have the 
full range of options that we normally do in the Senate to be able to 
correct it or object to it.
  Mr. President, these negotiators are not discussing some minor trade 
deal. They are debating what could be the largest U.S. trade agreement 
since NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement. I urge the White 
House and its negotiators to look beyond the final hours left on the 
fast-track clock. What happens in the next 48 hours could affect the 
American economy, American businesses, the American auto industry, and 
American workers for decades to come. The goal is not to race to the 
finish line. The goal should be to have the very best possible trade 
agreement--an agreement that raises the standards of living for 
everybody by creating a level playing field, an agreement that ensures 
market access for both countries--not just South Korea.
  This cannot be a one-way deal. It has to be an opening of markets for 
both American businesses, American agriculture, as well as South Korean 
agriculture and business, and so on, including the industry that has 
built the middle class of this country, which is the U.S. auto 
industry.
  There seems to be an agreement that upholds the value of what has 
made this country successful. Fair competition, competition that 
rewards hard work, deserves our attention, and it is based very simply 
on what we happen to think in Michigan is just plain common sense, 
having the rules be the same. It is pretty simple, but even though they 
are basic, right now there is a question as to whether they will be 
included in this rush to this final trade agreement, to beat the clock.
  We don't need an agreement that sells out American workers or pits 
American companies against foreign governments that cheat the system. 
In this rush to the finish line, this administration has failed to 
remember that there is an alternative. This Congress will pass good 
trade agreements without fast track. We have done it before. I have 
supported good trade agreements. I want to vote for good trade 
agreements. We want to export our

[[Page 8322]]

products, not our jobs. That is fundamentally what is at stake in this 
negotiation that is going on right this minute.
  I believe we must be a key player in the global economy. We are a key 
player, and trade agreements are part of that role. In fact, the old 
argument of protectionism versus free trade doesn't fit anymore. When 
you Blackberry your phone, the Internet can jump any wall that could be 
put up. There is a fundamental question for us today: How are we going 
to compete in a global economy and keep the middle class of this 
country, keep our way of life in this country? That is what is at stake 
in the negotiations going on right now.
  Unfortunately, fast-track authority has been used in the past to pass 
bad agreements through Congress. We undermine the integrity of our 
trade policy if the administration's agreements sell out our workers or 
export our middle class.
  Sadly, this administration makes it even worse by not enforcing our 
trade laws. We all know about what is happening when other countries, 
such as China or Japan, manipulate their currency--or, in some cases, 
even South Korea. We all know what happens when there are counterfeit 
products brought into this country and our ideas and patents are 
stolen, when other countries don't follow the rules. We need to make 
sure the rules are working and they are being enforced right now as we 
look to expand any agreements.
  We are talking about the next 48 hours. Simply put, racing to the 
finish line right now could very well, and likely will, result in a 
very bad trade agreement that will not allow our country to continue to 
have the edge, a bad trade agreement that will allow others to continue 
to cheat the international system, and a bad agreement for the people 
who are working hard at this moment, counting on us to get it right, 
counting on us to fight for a level playing field, so whether they own 
a business or whether they work for a business or whether they grow 
crops in the field, they can count on the rules being fair, the playing 
field level, and that we will enforce those rules on their behalf.
  South Korea is really the first test of this administration with the 
new Congress. Will this administration sell out American workers? Will 
they ignore the history of bilateral agreements with South Korea? Or 
will they work with us to get it right? The American people are 
counting on us to get it right. Eighty-two percent of the trade deficit 
with South Korea is in the automobile industry. Coming from the great 
State of Michigan, that matters to me. I hope it matters also to all of 
my colleagues, since this is the industry on which the middle class of 
this country has been built.
  Eighty-two percent of the trade deficit with South Korea is in the 
auto industry. That is because we have had two failed agreements with 
South Korea which have allowed cars to come into the United States 
while South Korea keeps its markets virtually closed. That doesn't make 
any sense. In fact, South Korea is the least open market for autos of 
any industrialized country. Meanwhile, South Korea continues to export 
7 out of 10 of their vehicles. So they make 10 and ship 7 outside of 
the country.
  The United States has a 12-year history and two auto-specific 
bilateral agreements with South Korea in an attempt to open their auto 
import market so we can sell to them. In 1995 and 1998, the United 
States attempted to level the playing field by instituting two 
memoranda of understanding that clearly stated the need to increase 
``foreign-made vehicle market access.'' But despite these attempts from 
the U.S. Government, both Republican and Democratic Presidents, nothing 
has changed with South Korea as it relates to our automobile industry.
  This chart is pretty clear as to what has happened. In 2006, Korea 
imported to us 749,822 automobiles. That is what came to us. And how 
many were we allowed to ship to them, built in America? Mr. President, 
4,556 vehicles. I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to figure out 
that is not a level playing field, that is not fair. Who in their right 
mind would negotiate a continuation of that situation? I can assure my 
colleagues, if that is what comes back or anything even close to it 
from this agreement, this Senator from Michigan will do everything I 
can possibly do to stop it from being enacted.
  In addition, South Korea has an 8-percent tariff on U.S. auto 
imports, three times the U.S. tariff, which is 2.5 percent. We have had 
two different agreements to fix this situation, and instead, we 
continue with tariffs that are so different: 8 percent that we pay, 2.5 
percent that they pay. Then on top of that, they do things such as make 
sure that our automobiles, foreign imports, have higher insurance rates 
or get audited or have other kinds of barriers on them, while we have 
an open marketplace and they come in unimpeded.
  I remind our negotiators, we have plenty of time to develop a good 
trade agreement. If we fix this situation, if we have something that 
truly is in the interest of Americans, of American workers, businesses, 
and farmers, I will be first on the floor to support it. But this is 
not fair. Something that maybe inches this up from 4,500 to 5,000 or 
6,000, while Korean imports continue to go up will not be fair.
  We have to have an open process so we have the same kind of access to 
their market that they have to ours. I thought that is what trade 
agreements were supposed to be about.
  There is no need to rush. There is no need to sell out our auto 
industry in America or our workers or any other group.
  I know there are other concerns as well from rice farmers and beef 
interests and others. Certainly, I don't think we should be in a 
situation where any of our American interests are put at risk because 
of a trade agreement. All we want is a level playing field. All we want 
is the ability to have the same rules apply no matter where one lives, 
and to have those rules enforced.
  Right now, as I said before, we have a 48-hour time period. We know 
at this moment there are people negotiating, trying to beat the clock 
in the next 48 hours. It won't work unless this is an agreement that 
works for America. And from my standpoint, it won't work unless it 
works for the American auto industry. These kinds of numbers make no 
sense whatsoever.
  I am very hopeful folks will stop and take a deep breath for a moment 
and look at what needs to be done, and then have faith in us, in 
Congress, that we will work with the administration to put together a 
good deal. If it is a good deal, if it is a good deal for American 
businesses, if it is a good deal for American workers, then it will 
sail through. But if it continues the bad deal we have had now for the 
last 12 years trying to work with South Korea, there are going to be 
serious objections.
  As I said so many times before, American workers and American 
businesses can compete with anybody, but we have to have a level 
playing field. We have to require that other countries play by the same 
rules we do and that we negotiate agreements that make sense, where the 
tariffs are the same and the rules are the same and the market access 
is the same. That is all I wish to see happen as a Senator from 
Michigan, and I know that is what we are all hoping will happen for 
those we represent.
  The next 48 hours are critically important for our working men and 
women in this country and American businesses, doing business here, 
that want to remain here, that want to remain in the business of 
providing good work with good pay and good benefits in the United 
States. That is what this is about.
  Again, we want to export our products, not our jobs. What happens in 
the next 48 hours will determine whether we are going to be able to 
work together with the administration to get this right.
  I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Klobuchar). The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
order for the quorum call be rescinded.

[[Page 8323]]

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, I assume we are in morning business.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. We are.

                          ____________________