[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 153 (2007), Part 3]
[Senate]
[Pages 3048-3051]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                         U.S. STRATEGY IN IRAQ

  Ms. STABENOW. Mr. President, I rise this evening being greatly 
disturbed by what happened on the floor of the Senate, after a 
tremendous amount of good-faith effort and very hard work by our 
colleagues on both sides of the aisle, bringing together a resolution 
to offer to this body for a debate, for a full debate on the question 
of escalating the war in Iraq. What we have seen from the minority is a 
filibuster that has stopped us from even proceeding--from even 
proceeding to be able to take up the resolution.
  Our majority leader offered to take up other resolutions, some 
contradicting the one that we wished to have brought forward, to have 
equally debated resolutions, the same amount of time, the same amount 
of votes that are needed in order to be able to bring forward the 
resolutions and possibly pass them.
  Every effort by the majority leader was turned down. Every time he 
brought up a possible solution to be able to bring forward these 
resolutions and have a full debate, which the American people are 
demanding that we do, he was told ``no.'' No, no, no. So we are now in 
a situation where the minority has voted down the ability for us to 
even go to a resolution or multiple resolutions dealing with the issue 
of Iraq, which we are all so deeply concerned about.
  Right now it is after midnight in Baghdad, and we have over 130,000

[[Page 3049]]

American troops who are settled in for another long night half a world 
away from home. They are living, working, fighting in the most 
difficult conditions anyone can imagine. They are patrolling crowded 
streets. They are standing guard on lonely posts. They are reaching out 
to Iraqi citizens and putting themselves constantly in harm's way to 
protect their fellow soldiers. They are there because their Government 
called them. They come from every corner of this great Nation. They 
represent every color, creed, religion, and political voice in this 
country.
  I have been to Iraq--many of us have--and I have talked to our men 
and women in the field and they are the best this country has to offer. 
For our entire history, they have answered when called. They have gone 
where we sent them. They have fought when we have asked them to do so. 
They have dedicated their lives to preparing for wars they did not 
want, and when asked, they have executed their training with pride, 
bravery, and an unwavering spirit.
  We are blessed this evening to sleep under the blanket of freedom 
they provide. And no one--no one in this Chamber--is questioning the 
job they are doing. We are all patriots in this debate--all of us--with 
differing views, strongly held views about the best way to move 
forward. We are all patriots.
  I have listened intently over the past weeks, and I have heard 
colleagues and representatives of the administration state time and 
again that those of us questioning the President are somehow 
undermining the morale of our troops. I find that insulting, not only 
to me and to my colleagues who care deeply about this and who have 
worked together in a bipartisan way to bring forward this resolution 
but to our soldiers, our sailors, our airmen, and marines. Open and 
honest debate about the execution of this war is not only what our 
armed services expect, it is what they deserve. Our citizen soldiers 
demand our best, and our best is not idle silence. Our best is not a 
filibuster that stops a resolution from even coming to the floor so 
that we can have an open, honest debate about it. Our citizen soldiers 
are on the frontlines. In this Chamber, we use words, but those words 
have real-world consequences, and no one lives those consequences more 
than our troops on the ground. Debate in a democracy does not undermine 
the morale or the will of our armed services. The lack of a clear, 
measurable, and achievable mission does undermine what they are doing. 
That is what we are all wanting to see happen. That is what we want to 
see developed for them.
  They need to know that their leaders have based their orders on 
reason, not on wishful thinking and on a misguided adherence to a 
failed strategy. They need to know that their leaders have sensibly 
considered all of the options available and that those considerations 
are grounded in fact, not in rhetoric or posturing.
  On October 11, 2002, 23 of us in the Senate cast a lonely vote 
against this White House effort to go to war because the evidence was 
not clear enough--it just wasn't there--to warrant going to war. I cast 
that vote because I believed that the pretense for war was based not in 
definable evidence but on predetermined conclusions. War is a tool of 
last resort, a decision that should be made with great trepidation when 
our country is at risk and other options have been exhausted.
  From day one, the reasoning for this war has been unclear and 
inconsistent, from the initial lack of preparedness for securing 
Baghdad to the most recent call for escalation. We have seen a strategy 
based on the best-case scenario calculations of politicians, not on the 
wholly realistic conclusions of career military officers. Mistakes have 
been made at every turn, and 4 years and over 3,000 American lives 
later and hundreds of thousands of lost lives and injuries of Iraqis, 
we are still paying the price.
  Some have insisted this resolution is a ploy to embarrass the 
President. This is clearly not our goal. This is not a discussion about 
politics. It is a debate about policy. Any soldier will tell you there 
are no politics in a foxhole. The American people, Republicans and 
Democrats, are asking us to look long and hard at what we are doing in 
Iraq. We were not elected to stand silently by while our fellow 
citizens demand answers.
  We can't even have a full debate because of the vote that happened. 
The American people are asking us not only to debate but to come to the 
right answers, the responsible answers for the direction and strategy 
in Iraq. Our soldiers deserve that, and we have in front of us a 
resolution that we couldn't even get enough votes to bring up to 
discuss, to debate it fully and have a vote. I believe the simple fact 
is very clear that escalation is not the answer, and I want the 
opportunity to vote on that, to say that on behalf of the people of 
Michigan. Putting more Americans in harm's way will not bring our men 
and women home any sooner. Why would we go further down the path that 
has led us to this point? Why would we repeat our previous mistakes and 
call it a new strategy?
  A free and stable Iraq can only be secured by the Iraqis. They must 
embrace responsibility for their collective future and decide that 
living and dying at the hands of sectarian violence is not the future 
they want for their children and their grandchildren. We must support 
their efforts--and I do--but we cannot substitute American troops for 
Iraqi resolve. With the freedom of self-determination comes the 
responsibility of collective security.
  We must continue to train our friends in Iraq. We must equip them and 
provide sensible military support based on the advice of our generals 
and military experts. We must lead them by example, by embracing the 
realities of our own democratic process as we attempt to collectively 
solve the challenges in the war in Iraq. How can we be talking to them 
about the democratic process when that process is stopped right here in 
the Senate in the ability to openly debate and vote on the resolution?
  I stand in support of the Warner-Levin resolution and to say that 
escalation is a grave mistake. I am certain when judged by our fellow 
Americans, the votes that many Members will cast, if we have the 
opportunity to do so, to say ``enough is enough'' to this White House 
will be greeted with sober support.
  With heaviness in my heart, I am also sadly confident that when 
judged by history, those who have questioned the reasoning and the 
execution of this war will have our concerns justified.
  We can't change how we got here. We can't change the fact we are in 
Iraq. That chapter of history is written, set in stone, and paid for 
with the lives of Americans and Iraqis, and the lives of many other 
individuals around the world. However, we can learn from the path we 
have walked. We have the ability to reassess and to change course, to 
get it right, to put forward our collective best wisdom from everyone 
who has been involved. On behalf of our soldiers, they deserve that. 
They deserve a full debate in the Senate, to be able to state our 
positions on policy, on policy that right now at this moment they are 
carrying out in Iraq. They deserve the very best debate and very best 
decisions.
  That is what this is about. That is what we were hoping to get 
tonight, the opportunity to go forward, to work together in a 
bipartisan way to put forward a statement that says we believe there is 
a better way, a better strategy than what the President has begun to 
execute.
  I hope we will have an opportunity to vote on this resolution. I 
welcome other resolutions that colleagues have put forward in good 
faith. I may not agree with them--and that is all right; that is how 
the process works--but they deserve debate just as our resolutions 
deserve debate.
  In Iraq, we are talking about their setting up a democracy, the 
ability to fully debate and participate in their government. We need to 
show by example that we are not afraid of debate, of involvement, we 
are not afraid to stand and say what we think and put our own vote and 
opinions on the line on something so critical to the future of our 
country, most particularly to our men

[[Page 3050]]

and women in the armed services and their families, and, frankly, to 
the world.
  We need the opportunity to vote. We need the opportunity to debate. 
The American people are calling on the Senate to do nothing less. 
Tonight was not an example of our listening.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. SANDERS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Whitehouse). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  Mr. SANDERS. Mr. President, in my home State of Vermont and all 
across this country, the American people are deeply concerned about the 
war in Iraq. They want real debate here in Washington on this issue 
and, more importantly, they want real action.
  Frankly, I have a hard time understanding why some of my colleagues, 
regardless of what their position on the war might be, would try to 
prevent a vote on what is at best a very modest proposal that was 
brought forth this afternoon. If you like the Warner bill, you should 
vote for it. If you do not like it, you should vote against it. But in 
fairness to the American people, we should have a serious debate and a 
vote on this issue.
  Let me be very clear in giving you my perspective on this war. In my 
view, President Bush's war in Iraq has been a disaster. It is a war we 
were misled into and a war many of us believed we never should have 
gotten into in the first place.
  This is a war which the administration was unprepared to fight. The 
administration has shown little understanding of the enemy or the 
historical context or the cultural context in which we found ourselves. 
Who will forget President Bush declaring ``mission accomplished'' 
aboard the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln when, in fact, the mission 
had barely begun? Who will forget Vice President Cheney telling us that 
the insurgency was in its ``last throes,'' just before some of the 
bloodiest months of the war took place? Who will ever forget those Bush 
advisers who predicted that the war would be a cakewalk--nothing to 
worry about--and that we would be greeted in Iraq as liberators?
  This war in Iraq has come at a very, very high price in so many ways. 
This is a war which has cost us terribly in American blood. As of 
today, we have lost some 3,100 brave American soldiers, twenty-three 
thousand more have been wounded, and tens of thousands will come home 
with post-traumatic stress disorder.
  This is a war which, with the President's proposed increase, will 
cost us some $500 billion, with the price tag going up by $8 billion 
every single month. This cost is going to add to the huge national debt 
we are already leaving to our children and grandchildren. And it is 
going to make it more difficult for us to fund health care, education, 
environmental protection, affordable housing, childcare, and the 
pressing needs of the middle class and working families of our country, 
not to mention the needs of our veterans, whose numbers are rapidly 
increasing as a result of this war.
  This is a war which has caused unimaginable horror for the people of 
Iraq. People who had suffered so long under the brutality of the Saddam 
Hussein dictatorship are suffering even more today. There are estimates 
that hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed or wounded and 
almost 2 million have been forced to flee their country--some 8 percent 
of their population.
  While civil war tears neighborhoods apart, children are without 
schools, and the Iraqi people lack electricity, health care, and other 
basic necessities of life. The doctors and nurses, teachers and 
administrators who have provided the professional infrastructure for 
the people of Iraq are now long gone.
  This is a war which has lowered our standing in the international 
community to an all-time low in our lifetimes, with leaders in 
democratic countries hesitant to work with us because of the lack of 
respect their citizens have for our President. Long-time friends and 
allies are simply wondering what is going on in the United States 
today. This is a war which has stretched our active-duty military to 
the breaking point, as well as our National Guard and Reserve forces. 
Morale in the military is low, and this war will have lasting impacts 
on the future recruitment, retention, and readiness of our Nation's 
military. This is a war which has in many respects lowered our 
capability to effectively fight the very serious threats of 
international terrorism and Islamic extremism.
  Five years after the horrific attacks of 9/11, Osama bin Laden 
remains free. Using the presence of United States troops in Iraq as 
their rallying call, al-Qaida's strength around the world continues to 
grow and the situation in Afghanistan is currently becoming more and 
more difficult.
  Tragically, this administration has refused to listen to the American 
people who, in this last election, made it very clear that they want a 
new direction in Iraq, and they want this war wound down, not 
escalated.
  This administration has refused to listen to the thoughtful 
suggestions of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, which included two 
former Secretaries of State, including President Bush's own father's 
Secretary of State, as well as a former Presidential chief of staff and 
a former Secretary of Defense, that it was time for a change in 
direction. This administration has refused to listen to the advice of 
our military leaders in Iraq who told us that increasing troops from 
the United States would make it easier for the Iraqi Government and 
military to avoid their political and military responsibilities.
  This administration has refused to listen to the Iraqi people who, 
according to a number of polls, have told us very strongly that they 
believe, in the midst of all of the horror and turmoil and violence 
within their country, that they would be safer and more secure if our 
troops left their country.
  In fact, this administration has tragically refused to listen to 
almost anybody except that same shrinking inner circle, led by the Vice 
President, who has consistently been wrong on this issue from day one.
  As most everybody understands and as the recent National Intelligence 
Estimate has confirmed, the situation today in Iraq is extremely dire. 
The sad truth is there are now no good options before us; there are 
simply less bad options. In Iraq today, according to Secretary of 
Defense Bob Gates, there are now at least four separate wars being 
fought, wars that our soldiers who have fought with incredible bravery 
and skill find themselves in the middle of.
  Let me quote Secretary Gates, who has recently stated:

       I believe there are essentially four wars going on in Iraq. 
     One is Shia on Shia, principally in the south; the second is 
     sectarian conflict, principally in Baghdad but not solely. 
     Third is the insurgency, and fourth is Al Queda.

  The reality today, as described by the Secretary of Defense, has 
nothing to do with why President Bush got us into this war in the first 
place. In March of 2002, he told us Iraq had weapons of mass 
destruction and that they were poised to use those weapons against us. 
That was not true and certainly has no relevance to the war today. In 
2002, the President told us Iraq was somehow linked to al-Qaida and 
bore some responsibility for the horrific 9/11 attack against our 
country. That also turned out not to be true and has no relevance to 
the situation we find ourselves in today.
  In the 2006 elections, the American people, in a loud and 
unmistakable voice, told us they no longer had confidence in the Bush 
administration's handling of the war in Iraq. In my view, they told us 
they wanted Congress to begin asserting its constitutional authority 
over this war, and they wanted us to rein in the administration. Most 
importantly, they told us they wanted us to begin the process of 
bringing our troops home as soon as possible. And as a Vermont Senator, 
that is exactly the effort I intend to make.

[[Page 3051]]

  In my view, the Warner resolution is far too weak. It is a baby step 
forward. Whether it is passed or not, it must be followed with much 
stronger legislation, legislation that has real teeth. Instead of just 
voicing our disapproval of President Bush's escalation of the war with 
a nonbinding resolution, we should now be considering legislation that 
provides for the safe and orderly redeployment of virtually all of our 
troops out of Iraq within the next year, even as we continue to give 
support to the Iraq Government and their military for the purpose of 
helping them accept their political and military responsibilities. That 
is the legislation we should be debating. That is the legislation we 
should be passing.
  How can we accomplish this withdrawal and redeployment? Regardless of 
what happens with the nonbinding Warner bill, in the very near future 
we must bring forth legislation on to the floor of the Senate that 
would prohibit the use of funds for an escalation of United States 
military forces without a specific new authorization from the Congress. 
Secondly, we must consider legislation to require a schedule for the 
return home of a majority of American forces and the redeployment of 
the rest of the American forces from Iraq to other places. Finally, we 
must vote against any additional funding to increase troop levels. In 
addition, we must set conditions in any future funding bill so that the 
President is obliged to begin winding down this war.
  We are mired in a war that has gone on longer than American 
involvement in either the First World War or the Second World War. We 
will spend more money on this war in real dollars than we spent on 
either the Korean war or the war in Vietnam. Our standing in the 
international community has declined, and our ability to combat 
international terrorism has been seriously compromised. It is time to 
say no to this ill-conceived escalation. It is time to deploy our 
troops out of harm's way. It is time to end this war.

                          ____________________