[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 153 (2007), Part 16]
[House]
[Pages 22758-22761]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                           MOTION TO ADJOURN

  Mr. HOEKSTRA. Madam Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion to adjourn.
  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that 
the noes appeared to have it.
  Mr. HOEKSTRA. Madam Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
  The yeas and nays were ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 180, 
nays 237, not voting 15, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 817]

                               YEAS--180

     Aderholt
     Akin
     Alexander
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Baker
     Barrett (SC)
     Bartlett (MD)
     Barton (TX)
     Biggert
     Bilbray
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (UT)
     Blackburn
     Blunt
     Boehner
     Bonner
     Bono
     Boozman
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Broun (GA)
     Brown (SC)
     Buchanan
     Burgess
     Burton (IN)
     Buyer
     Camp (MI)
     Campbell (CA)
     Cannon
     Cantor
     Capito
     Carter
     Castle
     Chabot
     Coble
     Cole (OK)
     Conaway
     Cubin
     Culberson
     Davis (KY)
     Davis, David
     Davis, Tom
     Deal (GA)
     Diaz-Balart, L.
     Diaz-Balart, M.
     Doolittle
     Drake
     Duncan
     Ehlers
     Emerson
     English (PA)
     Everett
     Fallin
     Feeney
     Ferguson
     Flake
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Fossella
     Foxx
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Garrett (NJ)
     Gillmor
     Gingrey
     Gohmert
     Goode
     Goodlatte
     Granger
     Graves
     Hastert
     Hastings (WA)
     Heller
     Hensarling
     Herger
     Hobson
     Hoekstra
     Hulshof
     Hunter
     Inglis (SC)
     Issa
     Jindal
     Jordan
     Keller
     King (IA)
     King (NY)
     Kline (MN)
     Knollenberg
     Kuhl (NY)
     LaHood
     Lamborn
     Latham
     LaTourette
     Lewis (CA)
     Lewis (KY)
     Linder
     Lucas
     Lungren, Daniel E.
     Mack
     Manzullo
     Marchant
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCaul (TX)
     McHenry
     McHugh
     McKeon
     McMorris Rodgers
     Mica
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Murphy, Tim
     Musgrave
     Myrick
     Nadler
     Neugebauer
     Nunes
     Pearce
     Pence
     Peterson (PA)
     Petri
     Pickering
     Pitts
     Platts
     Poe
     Porter
     Price (GA)
     Pryce (OH)
     Putnam
     Radanovich
     Regula
     Rehberg
     Reichert
     Renzi
     Reynolds
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rohrabacher
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Royce
     Ryan (WI)
     Sali
     Saxton
     Schmidt
     Sensenbrenner
     Sessions
     Shadegg
     Shays
     Shimkus
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Souder
     Stearns
     Sullivan
     Tancredo
     Terry
     Thornberry
     Tiahrt
     Tiberi
     Turner
     Upton
     Walberg
     Walden (OR)
     Walsh (NY)
     Wamp
     Weldon (FL)
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Wicker
     Wilson (NM)
     Wilson (SC)
     Wolf
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)

                               NAYS--237

     Abercrombie
     Ackerman
     Allen
     Altmire
     Andrews
     Arcuri
     Baca
     Baird
     Baldwin
     Barrow
     Bean
     Becerra
     Berkley
     Berman
     Berry
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Blumenauer
     Boren
     Boswell
     Boucher
     Boyd (FL)
     Boyda (KS)
     Brady (PA)
     Braley (IA)
     Brown, Corrine
     Butterfield
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardoza
     Carnahan
     Carney
     Carson
     Castor
     Chandler
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Cohen
     Conyers
     Cooper
     Costa
     Costello
     Courtney
     Cramer
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Cummings
     Davis (AL)
     Davis (CA)
     Davis (IL)
     Davis, Lincoln
     DeFazio
     Delahunt
     DeLauro
     Dent
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Donnelly
     Doyle
     Dreier
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Ellsworth
     Emanuel
     Engel
     Eshoo
     Etheridge
     Farr
     Fattah
     Filner
     Frank (MA)
     Gallegly
     Gerlach
     Giffords
     Gilchrest
     Gillibrand
     Gonzalez
     Gordon
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Grijalva
     Gutierrez
     Hall (NY)
     Hall (TX)
     Hare
     Harman
     Hastings (FL)
     Herseth Sandlin
     Higgins
     Hill
     Hinchey
     Hinojosa
     Hirono
     Hodes
     Holden
     Holt
     Honda
     Hooley
     Hoyer
     Inslee
     Israel
     Jackson (IL)
     Jackson-Lee (TX)
     Jefferson
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson (IL)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Jones (NC)
     Jones (OH)
     Kagen
     Kanjorski
     Kaptur
     Kennedy
     Kildee
     Kilpatrick
     Kind
     Kingston
     Kirk
     Klein (FL)
     Kucinich
     Lampson
     Langevin
     Lantos
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Lee
     Levin
     Lewis (GA)
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Loebsack
     Lofgren, Zoe
     Lowey
     Mahoney (FL)
     Maloney (NY)
     Marshall
     Matheson
     Matsui
     McCarthy (NY)
     McCollum (MN)
     McCotter
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McIntyre
     McNerney
     McNulty
     Meek (FL)
     Meeks (NY)
     Melancon
     Michaud
     Miller (NC)
     Miller, George
     Mitchell
     Mollohan
     Moore (KS)
     Moore (WI)
     Moran (KS)
     Murphy (CT)
     Murphy, Patrick
     Murtha
     Napolitano
     Neal (MA)
     Oberstar
     Obey
     Olver
     Ortiz
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor
     Payne
     Perlmutter
     Peterson (MN)
     Pomeroy
     Price (NC)
     Rahall
     Ramstad
     Rangel
     Reyes
     Rodriguez
     Ross
     Rothman
     Roybal-Allard
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Salazar
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schwartz
     Scott (GA)
     Scott (VA)
     Serrano
     Sestak
     Shea-Porter
     Sherman
     Shuler
     Sires
     Skelton
     Slaughter
     Smith (WA)
     Snyder
     Solis
     Space
     Spratt
     Stark
     Stupak
     Sutton
     Tanner
     Tauscher
     Taylor
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Tierney
     Towns
     Udall (CO)
     Udall (NM)
     Van Hollen
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Walz (MN)
     Wasserman Schultz
     Waters
     Watson
     Watt
     Waxman
     Weiner
     Welch (VT)
     Weller
     Wilson (OH)
     Woolsey
     Wu
     Wynn
     Yarmuth

                             NOT VOTING--15

     Brown-Waite, Ginny
     Calvert
     Clarke
     Crenshaw
     Davis, Jo Ann
     DeGette
     Dicks
     Hayes
     Johnson, Sam
     Lynch
     Markey
     McCrery
     Moran (VA)
     Paul
     Wexler

                              {time}  1628

  Mr. GERLACH and Mr. DENT changed their vote from ``yea'' to ``nay.''
  Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky and Mr. PICKERING changed their vote from 
``nay'' to ``yea.''
  So the motion to adjourn was rejected.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Madam Speaker, I continue to reserve my 
time.

[[Page 22759]]


  Mr. SESSIONS. Madam Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentlewoman 
from the Land of Enchantment, Mrs. Wilson.

                              {time}  1630

  Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico. Madam Speaker, when we adjourned we were 
discussing a rule to make in order two bills, one relating to Minnesota 
and the other relating to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. 
The rule does not specify a particular bill number, but my colleague 
from Florida has made us aware of a bill that was introduced. The bill 
that the leadership currently intends to bring to the floor is H.R. 
3356. I would tell my colleagues that the Director of National 
Intelligence had not seen this piece of legislation when it was brought 
to the floor today.
  In the intervening time that we've been waiting for the vote tally 
system to become operational again, they've been able to at least 
initially take a look at it, and we expect a formal statement from our 
intelligence community shortly, but I have also taken a look at this 
bill. If we're trying to fix the intelligence gap, this will not do it. 
In fact, this will make the intelligence gap wider than it currently 
is, and I want to explain to my colleagues why.
  First, and most importantly, this legislation would continue to 
require a warrant for the collection of foreign intelligence involving 
foreign persons in a foreign country. When the Foreign Intelligence 
Surveillance Act was passed in 1978, the intention was to protect the 
civil liberties of Americans, and that is what the law should continue 
to do. Because of changes in technology, the Foreign Intelligence 
Surveillance Court is now being completely backlogged with requests for 
warrants that they never used to have to see because telecommunications 
have changed.
  We need to go back to what the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act 
was intended to do, which is to protect the civil liberties of 
Americans and allow us to rapidly collect foreign intelligence on 
foreign persons in foreign countries without first having to go to 
court and get a warrant. That is not too much to ask, and the Director 
of National Intelligence has warned all of us that there are things we 
should be getting that we are not listening to.
  The leadership does not have to bring, under this rule, this 
particular piece of legislation to the floor, and as I understand it, 
negotiations are continuing and are being much more fruitful with our 
colleagues in the other body. But we must, before we leave here for 
August break, fix this problem. It's a problem we've known about for 
some time and tried to work on and quietly fix. I would much prefer 
that these things be done quietly, but when it was clear that the law 
was not working, that it was not protecting Americans, and that we were 
not moving quickly to fix and close this intelligence gap, I decided 
that I needed to take action and with my colleagues push more publicly 
to get this fixed.
  I believe it is possible here today in this House to find the 
consensus and something that works for our intelligence agencies to be 
able to listen to foreigners in foreign countries, who are using the 
communications systems America has built, to plot, to plan, to kill us.
  I would encourage the leadership on the other side of the aisle to 
work constructively with the Director of National Intelligence, call 
him and get him up here and work this out so that we can do the right 
thing for our country.
  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Madam Speaker, I would remind everyone here 
that this rule is to make in order a suspension day. This particular 
measure is not about FISA.
  Madam Speaker, I'm very pleased to yield to a woman that I've worked 
with on the Intelligence Committee when she was the ranking member of 
the Intelligence Committee and that I worked on that committee with for 
6 years. In this body is the distinguished chairman of the Intelligence 
Committee; in addition, another of my colleagues, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. 
Turner, Mr. Holt. All of us serve on that same committee that Mrs. 
Wilson serves on, and I rather suspect that she knows that we know that 
there is no prohibition that she has suggested here.
  I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. 
Harman), the former ranking member of the House Permanent Select 
Committee and the now-Chair of the Subcommittee on Intelligence, 
Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment of the Homeland 
Security Committee.
  Ms. HARMAN. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding and 
commend him again for his service both on the Rules Committee and 
ongoing on the Intelligence Committee.
  It is reassuring that the debate has quieted. As many people have 
said on both sides, this is a very serious subject. While we were 
having our break because of a computer glitch, I had the chance to sit 
on the floor and talk to many colleagues on a bipartisan basis about 
how this Member who has studied this issue for years sees it.
  I point out to colleagues that the bill that has been distributed, 
H.R. 3356, says on page 2, section 105(a), ``a court order is not 
required for the acquisition of the contents of any communication 
between persons that are not located within the United States.''
  It is the intention of this bill, which will be made in order on the 
suspension calendar under the rule, to exempt foreign-to-foreign 
communications, and it is the intention, I believe, of every single 
person sitting here, several hundred of us, to exempt foreign-to-
foreign communications from the warrant requirements of the Foreign 
Intelligence Surveillance Act.
  What is really at issue, and I hope this will clarify the subject for 
some who are still wondering what it is, is whether or not we will have 
a court approve the parameters, the framework of this entire program, 
or whether we will leave the dimensions of the program and the 
activities under the program to the Attorney General or perhaps the 
Attorney General working with the Director of National Intelligence.
  Some of us know the details of this program. It's a valuable program. 
It's very complicated, and it has many different parts. I, for one, 
thought that it was being regulated under the Foreign Intelligence 
Surveillance Act until I learned recently that the administration had 
chosen not to follow FISA. I think, and I would hope many on the other 
side would think, that we must have a legal framework around this 
program. No more blank checks for this Attorney General or for any 
future Attorneys General.
  I urge approval of this rule.
  Mr. SESSIONS. Madam Speaker, I would like to inquire as to how much 
time remains on both sides.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Texas has 5\1/2\ minutes. 
The gentleman from Florida has 8 minutes.
  Mr. SESSIONS. Madam Speaker, if I could inquire of the gentleman from 
Florida if he would like to run down some of his time at this time or 
if he's through with his speakers.
  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Excuse me.
  Mr. SESSIONS. I would like to inquire of the gentleman if he would 
like to get the time even and to run down with another speaker. We're a 
little bit ahead.
  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Madam Speaker, I continue to reserve the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. SESSIONS. Madam Speaker, I yield 3\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman 
from Michigan (Mr. Hoekstra), the ranking member of the Intelligence 
Committee.
  Mr. HOEKSTRA. Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for yielding.
  As our previous colleague was talking, I think she laid it out pretty 
well. Are we going to involve the courts in reviewing our foreign 
intelligence activities? If you take a look at the bill that is out 
here, it appears that the court is going to be involved in reviewing 
our intelligence community activities overseas. This becomes the 
Terrorist Protection Act, not a surveillance program.
  Do we want a court reviewing our tactics and strategies for foreign 
intelligence or foreign individuals in foreign

[[Page 22760]]

locations and lay it out the way that this bill wants? This is not 
about theory. This is about protecting the homeland, and it is about 
protecting our troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
  Does it make sense that when a commander in the field gets the 
information or gets leads that may protect their soldiers that, rather 
than following the lead immediately, the first thing that they do is 
bring in the lawyers to make sure that they get that information in an 
appropriate and legal way on the battlefield? Is that giving our troops 
the tools that they need to keep themselves safe and secure and defeat 
the enemy?
  Does it make sense when our intelligence frontline folks, whether 
it's in northern Africa or in the Middle East, get a lead as to 
individuals who may be targeting the United States, that the first 
thing that they need to do is get the lawyers involved to make sure 
that foreign intelligence is collected in an appropriate way, rather 
than focusing on what needs to keep us safe?
  After 9/11, we spent a lot of time working together to put together 
an intelligence community that would, in the future, be able to connect 
the dots. With this bill that it looks like we're going to consider 
this afternoon, we won't have to worry about connecting the dots 
anymore because we will put the barriers in place that means that they 
will not even be able to collect the dots. But if you believe that this 
is a bumper sticker war and this is a bumper sticker threat that we 
face today, this bill is for you.
  Take a look at the statement by the Director of National 
Intelligence. The Director of National Intelligence today is the same 
individual that served many years under President Bill Clinton as the 
Director of the National Security Agency. Here's what he has to say 
about this bill:

       I have reviewed the proposal that the House of 
     Representatives is expected to vote on this afternoon to 
     modify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The House 
     proposal is unacceptable. I strongly oppose it. The House 
     proposal would not allow me to carry out my responsibility to 
     provide warning and to protect the Nation, especially in our 
     heightened threat environment. I urge Members of Congress to 
     support the legislation I provided last evening to modify 
     FISA to equip our intelligence community with the tools we 
     need to protect our Nation.

  This is an individual who has a 30-year career in this business. He 
served President Clinton; he's serving President Bush, but most 
importantly, it is a career that is distinguished because he has served 
the country and has kept us safe. Let's respect his opinion. Let's give 
him the tools that will keep us safe, keep us safe in the homeland and 
keep our troops safe on the battlefield.

                              {time}  1645

  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Madam Speaker, I continue to be astounded, 
particularly at the remarks of the distinguished ranking member of the 
committee that I serve on with him, that he would have us believe 
something different than what his proposal allows for. His proposal, or 
the proposal of the minority, would allow the Attorney General to do 
this, not lawyers.
  Madam Speaker, I yield 3\1/2\ minutes to the point person for every 
person in the House of Representatives on intelligence, the 
distinguished Chair of the Select Committee on Intelligence, Mr. 
Silvestre Reyes.
  Mr. REYES. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  Madam Speaker, I want to start off by correcting the distinguished 
gentleman from Michigan. Director McConnell didn't have 30 years, 
doesn't have 30 years experience in working in intelligence, he has 40 
years experience working in intelligence. The reason I know that is for 
the last couple of weeks we have been working, trying to work together 
in a bipartisan way with the Senate and the House on this bill that we 
have here today.
  Director McConnell asked us to do three things yesterday, and he 
sought the very bill that he is rejecting today, three things, and he 
could support our bill. Those three things were: expand it from 
relating to terrorism to relating to foreign intelligence; eliminate 
the requirement that the FISA Court adjudicate how recurring 
communications into the U.S. from foreign targets would be handled; 
and, third, allow for foreign targets to be added for the basket 
warrant after the warrant was approved. We did each and every one of 
these things.
  They say, okay, we got a deal. No. After getting on the phone with 
the White House and the Republican leadership, he said, oh, I have a 
few other things that we need.
  Well, you know, when we talk about the security of this country, when 
we talk about a serious issue like giving our intelligence 
professionals the tools that they need to keep us safe, it is serious 
business.
  Today, we have to decide for ourselves do we want, on a temporary 
basis for 120 days, to give the Director the tools that he said he 
needed, the three things that he said he needed included in our bill to 
keep us safe while we work on the bigger issue, the bigger fix of FISA, 
or if you vote against this bill, do you make it a political issue?
  The choice is simple. Are you interested in giving him the tools that 
are needed and necessary to keep us safe, or do you want it as a 
political issue? That's the question before us this afternoon.
  The Director yesterday, in answering to the majority leader's 
inquiry, said this bill, this bill that we have before us today, 
significantly enhances America's security, the very bill that, 
according to the ranking member, he is rejecting.
  My colleague, the gentlelady from New Mexico, says we didn't show the 
DNI the bill. We sent that to him. His lawyers dissected it. We were in 
the same room; and on one occasion, at least one occasion, Mr. Hoekstra 
was with us as we were talking about the issues, along with the Senate, 
didn't show it to him.
  He had a chance to look at it, digest it and make recommendations, 
like the three issues that I just read, that he agreed to yesterday. 
Those are important things. Facts matter. The truth matters. Not about 
obfuscating the truth, it's about doing what's right for our country.
  This is the right thing to do, to keep us safe for the next 120 days, 
so we continue to do the work of this committee.
  Mr. SESSIONS. Madam Speaker, it is about doing the right thing. In 
doing so, I would like to make sure that we get it right this time.
  Despite what someone may have been told, I have a statement by the 
Director of National Intelligence that was issued this afternoon at 
4:30. The gentleman says, ``I have reviewed the proposal that the House 
of Representatives is expected to vote on this afternoon to modify the 
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The House proposal is 
unacceptable, and I strongly oppose it.
  ``The House proposal would not allow me to carry out my 
responsibility to provide warning and to protect the Nation, especially 
in our heightened threat environment.
  ``I urge Members of Congress to support the legislation I provided 
last evening to modify FISA and to equip our intelligence community 
with the tools we need to protect our Nation.''
  They cannot have it both ways. They cannot have it where they say 
it's a complicated issue. Protecting this country should not be 
complicated when people who are trying to do the right thing are asking 
and showing people what to do.
  The Republicans have made our choice known today, and that is we are 
going to stand behind the Director of National Intelligence.
  Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Madam Chairman, what the gentleman just read 
was ordered to the White House by the National Intelligence Director. 
The Republican logic allows that what was acceptable yesterday is not 
acceptable today.


                         Parliamentary Inquiry

  Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico. Parliamentary inquiry, Madam Chairman.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from New Mexico will state 
her parliamentary inquiry.
  Does the gentleman from Florida yield to the gentlewoman from New 
Mexico?

[[Page 22761]]


  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. I do not.


              Amendment Offered by Mr. Hastings of Florida

  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Madam Speaker, I have an amendment to the 
rule at the desk.
  The Clerk read as follows:

       Amendment offered by Mr. Hastings of Florida:
       Add at the end the following:
       (3) A bill to authorize additional funds for emergency 
     repairs and reconstruction of the Interstate I-35 bridge 
     located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, that collapsed on August 
     1, 2007, to waive the $100,000,000 limitation on emergency 
     relief funds for those emergency repairs and reconstruction, 
     and for other purposes.

  Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Madam Speaker, I want to take this 
opportunity to briefly describe this amendment to House Resolution 600.
  The amendment would add a third suspension measure to this 
resolution, a bill to provide assistance to Minnesota. This will allow 
the House to consider the Minnesota bridge disaster emergency relief 
legislation. I am sure that everyone here would urge that the 
reconstruction of the bridge that tragically collapsed on Wednesday be 
undertaken.
  While the minority has been engaging in manufactured obstructionism, 
the House has been denied the opportunity to act on the priorities of 
the American people.
  While the minority has been engaged in manufactured obstructionism, 
the House has enacted on legislation to require a comprehensive 
strategy to withdraw our troops from harm's way.
  While the minority has been engaged in manufacturing obstructionism, 
the House has not been able to act on FISA reform.
  Finally, while the minority has engaged in manufactured 
obstructionism, the House has not acted on providing emergency 
assistance to our fellow Americans who are grieving and suffering in 
Minnesota.
  Manufactured obstructionism is what they are doing, and the American 
people will not stand for it.
  By allowing this bill to come to the floor today, we can get this 
bill to the President's desk immediately. Whatever differences we have 
here today, this should be something we all can support.
  I hope my colleagues will support the amendment and the rule.
  Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time, and I move the 
previous question on the amendment and on the resolution.
  The previous question was ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the amendment offered by 
the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Hastings).
  The amendment was agreed to.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the resolution, as 
amended.
  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that 
the ayes appeared to have it.
  Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
  The yeas and nays were ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 228, 
nays 196, not voting 8, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 818]

                               YEAS--228

     Abercrombie
     Ackerman
     Allen
     Altmire
     Andrews
     Arcuri
     Baca
     Baird
     Baldwin
     Barrow
     Bean
     Becerra
     Berkley
     Berman
     Berry
     Bishop (GA)
     Bishop (NY)
     Blumenauer
     Boren
     Boswell
     Boucher
     Boyd (FL)
     Boyda (KS)
     Brady (PA)
     Braley (IA)
     Brown, Corrine
     Butterfield
     Capps
     Capuano
     Cardoza
     Carnahan
     Carney
     Carson
     Castor
     Chandler
     Clay
     Cleaver
     Clyburn
     Cohen
     Conyers
     Cooper
     Costa
     Costello
     Courtney
     Cramer
     Crowley
     Cuellar
     Cummings
     Davis (AL)
     Davis (CA)
     Davis (IL)
     Davis, Lincoln
     DeFazio
     DeGette
     Delahunt
     DeLauro
     Dicks
     Dingell
     Doggett
     Donnelly
     Doyle
     Edwards
     Ellison
     Ellsworth
     Emanuel
     Engel
     Eshoo
     Etheridge
     Farr
     Fattah
     Filner
     Frank (MA)
     Giffords
     Gillibrand
     Gonzalez
     Gordon
     Green, Al
     Green, Gene
     Grijalva
     Gutierrez
     Hall (NY)
     Hare
     Harman
     Hastings (FL)
     Herseth Sandlin
     Higgins
     Hill
     Hinchey
     Hinojosa
     Hirono
     Hodes
     Holden
     Holt
     Honda
     Hooley
     Hoyer
     Inslee
     Israel
     Jackson (IL)
     Jackson-Lee (TX)
     Jefferson
     Johnson (GA)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Jones (OH)
     Kagen
     Kanjorski
     Kaptur
     Kennedy
     Kildee
     Kilpatrick
     Kind
     Klein (FL)
     Kucinich
     Lampson
     Langevin
     Lantos
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Lee
     Levin
     Lewis (GA)
     Lipinski
     Loebsack
     Lofgren, Zoe
     Lowey
     Lynch
     Mahoney (FL)
     Maloney (NY)
     Marshall
     Matheson
     Matsui
     McCarthy (NY)
     McCollum (MN)
     McDermott
     McGovern
     McIntyre
     McNerney
     McNulty
     Meek (FL)
     Meeks (NY)
     Melancon
     Michaud
     Miller (NC)
     Miller, George
     Mitchell
     Mollohan
     Moore (KS)
     Moore (WI)
     Moran (VA)
     Murphy (CT)
     Murphy, Patrick
     Murtha
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Neal (MA)
     Oberstar
     Obey
     Olver
     Ortiz
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor
     Payne
     Perlmutter
     Peterson (MN)
     Pomeroy
     Price (NC)
     Rahall
     Ramstad
     Rangel
     Reyes
     Rodriguez
     Ross
     Rothman
     Roybal-Allard
     Ruppersberger
     Rush
     Ryan (OH)
     Salazar
     Sanchez, Linda T.
     Sanchez, Loretta
     Sarbanes
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schwartz
     Scott (GA)
     Scott (VA)
     Serrano
     Sestak
     Shea-Porter
     Sherman
     Shuler
     Sires
     Skelton
     Slaughter
     Smith (WA)
     Snyder
     Solis
     Space
     Spratt
     Stark
     Stupak
     Sutton
     Tanner
     Tauscher
     Taylor
     Thompson (CA)
     Thompson (MS)
     Tierney
     Towns
     Udall (CO)
     Udall (NM)
     Van Hollen
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Walz (MN)
     Wasserman Schultz
     Watson
     Watt
     Waxman
     Weiner
     Welch (VT)
     Wexler
     Wilson (OH)
     Woolsey
     Wu
     Wynn
     Yarmuth

                               NAYS--196

     Aderholt
     Akin
     Alexander
     Bachmann
     Bachus
     Baker
     Barrett (SC)
     Bartlett (MD)
     Barton (TX)
     Biggert
     Bilbray
     Bilirakis
     Bishop (UT)
     Blackburn
     Blunt
     Boehner
     Bonner
     Bono
     Boozman
     Boustany
     Brady (TX)
     Broun (GA)
     Brown (SC)
     Brown-Waite, Ginny
     Buchanan
     Burgess
     Burton (IN)
     Buyer
     Calvert
     Camp (MI)
     Campbell (CA)
     Cannon
     Cantor
     Capito
     Carter
     Castle
     Chabot
     Coble
     Cole (OK)
     Conaway
     Cubin
     Culberson
     Davis (KY)
     Davis, David
     Davis, Tom
     Deal (GA)
     Dent
     Diaz-Balart, L.
     Diaz-Balart, M.
     Doolittle
     Drake
     Dreier
     Duncan
     Ehlers
     Emerson
     English (PA)
     Everett
     Fallin
     Feeney
     Ferguson
     Flake
     Forbes
     Fortenberry
     Fossella
     Foxx
     Franks (AZ)
     Frelinghuysen
     Gallegly
     Garrett (NJ)
     Gerlach
     Gilchrest
     Gillmor
     Gingrey
     Goode
     Goodlatte
     Granger
     Graves
     Hall (TX)
     Hastert
     Hastings (WA)
     Heller
     Hensarling
     Herger
     Hobson
     Hoekstra
     Hulshof
     Hunter
     Inglis (SC)
     Issa
     Jindal
     Johnson (IL)
     Jones (NC)
     Jordan
     Keller
     King (IA)
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kirk
     Kline (MN)
     Knollenberg
     Kuhl (NY)
     LaHood
     Lamborn
     Latham
     LaTourette
     Lewis (CA)
     Lewis (KY)
     Linder
     LoBiondo
     Lucas
     Lungren, Daniel E.
     Mack
     Manzullo
     Marchant
     McCarthy (CA)
     McCaul (TX)
     McCotter
     McCrery
     McHenry
     McHugh
     McKeon
     McMorris Rodgers
     Mica
     Miller (FL)
     Miller (MI)
     Miller, Gary
     Moran (KS)
     Murphy, Tim
     Musgrave
     Myrick
     Neugebauer
     Nunes
     Pearce
     Pence
     Peterson (PA)
     Petri
     Pickering
     Pitts
     Platts
     Poe
     Porter
     Price (GA)
     Pryce (OH)
     Putnam
     Radanovich
     Regula
     Rehberg
     Reichert
     Renzi
     Reynolds
     Rogers (AL)
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Rohrabacher
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roskam
     Royce
     Ryan (WI)
     Sali
     Saxton
     Schmidt
     Sensenbrenner
     Sessions
     Shadegg
     Shays
     Shimkus
     Shuster
     Simpson
     Smith (NE)
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Souder
     Stearns
     Sullivan
     Tancredo
     Terry
     Thornberry
     Tiahrt
     Tiberi
     Turner
     Upton
     Walberg
     Walden (OR)
     Walsh (NY)
     Wamp
     Waters
     Weldon (FL)
     Weller
     Westmoreland
     Whitfield
     Wicker
     Wilson (NM)
     Wilson (SC)
     Wolf
     Young (AK)
     Young (FL)

                             NOT VOTING--8

     Clarke
     Crenshaw
     Davis, Jo Ann
     Gohmert
     Hayes
     Johnson, Sam
     Markey
     Paul

                              {time}  1714

  Mrs. BACHMANN, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, and Mr. CANNON changed their vote from 
``yea'' to ``nay.''
  Mr. LINCOLN DAVIS of Tennessee changed his vote from ``nay'' to 
``yea.''
  So the resolution, as amended, was agreed to.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________