[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 153 (2007), Part 16]
[House]
[Pages 21753-21887]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




CONFERENCE REPORT ON H.R. 1495, WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007

  Mr. Oberstar submitted the following conference report and statement 
on the bill (H.R. 1495) to provide for the conservation and development 
of water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army 
to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of 
the United States, and for other purposes:

                  Conference Report (H. Rept. 110-280)

       The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the 
     two Houses on the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 
     1495), to provide for the conservation and development of 
     water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of 
     the Army to construct various projects for improvements to 
     rivers and harbors of the United States, and for other 
     purposes, having met, after full and free conference, have 
     agreed to recommend and do recommend to their respective 
     Houses as follows:
       That the House recede from its disagreement to the 
     amendment of the Senate and agree to the same with an 
     amendment as follows:
       In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the Senate 
     amendment, insert the following:

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

       (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2007''.
       (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 1001. Project authorizations.
Sec. 1002. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 1003. Small projects for emergency streambank protection.
Sec. 1004. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 1005. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
              environment.
Sec. 1006. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 1007. Small projects for shoreline protection.
Sec. 1008. Small projects for snagging and sediment removal.
Sec. 1009. Small projects to prevent or mitigate damage caused by 
              navigation projects.
Sec. 1010. Small projects for aquatic plant control.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 2001. Non-Federal contributions.
Sec. 2002. Funding to process permits.
Sec. 2003. Written agreement for water resources projects.
Sec. 2004. Compilation of laws.
Sec. 2005. Dredged material disposal.
Sec. 2006. Remote and subsistence harbors.
Sec. 2007. Use of other Federal funds.
Sec. 2008. Revision of project partnership agreement; cost sharing.
Sec. 2009. Expedited actions for emergency flood damage reduction.

[[Page 21754]]

Sec. 2010. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 2011. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 2012. Wildfire firefighting.
Sec. 2013. Technical assistance.
Sec. 2014. Lakes program.
Sec. 2015. Cooperative agreements.
Sec. 2016. Training funds.
Sec. 2017. Access to water resource data.
Sec. 2018. Shore protection projects.
Sec. 2019. Ability to pay.
Sec. 2020. Aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration.
Sec. 2021. Small flood damage reduction projects.
Sec. 2022. Small river and harbor improvement projects.
Sec. 2023. Protection of highways, bridge approaches, public works, and 
              nonprofit public services.
Sec. 2024. Modification of projects for improvement of the quality of 
              the environment.
Sec. 2025. Remediation of abandoned mine sites.
Sec. 2026. Leasing authority.
Sec. 2027. Fiscal transparency report.
Sec. 2028. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 2029. Sense of Congress on criteria for operation and maintenance 
              of harbor dredging projects.
Sec. 2030. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 2031. Water resources principles and guidelines.
Sec. 2032. Water resource priorities report.
Sec. 2033. Planning.
Sec. 2034. Independent peer review.
Sec. 2035. Safety assurance review.
Sec. 2036. Mitigation for fish and wildlife and wetlands losses.
Sec. 2037. Regional sediment management.
Sec. 2038. National shoreline erosion control development program.
Sec. 2039. Monitoring ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 2040. Electronic submission of permit applications.
Sec. 2041. Project administration.
Sec. 2042. Program administration.
Sec. 2043. Studies and reports for water resources projects.
Sec. 2044. Coordination and scheduling of Federal, State, and local 
              actions.
Sec. 2045. Project streamlining.
Sec. 2046. Project deauthorization.
Sec. 2047. Federal hopper dredges.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 3001. Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama.
Sec. 3002. Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 3003. King Cove Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3004. Seward Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3005. Sitka, Alaska.
Sec. 3006. Tatitlek, Alaska.
Sec. 3007. Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona.
Sec. 3008. Nogales Wash and tributaries flood control project, Arizona.
Sec. 3009. Tucson drainage area, Arizona.
Sec. 3010. Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.
Sec. 3011. St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 3012. Pine Mountain Dam, Arkansas.
Sec. 3013. Red-Ouachita River Basin Levees, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Sec. 3014. Cache Creek Basin, California.
Sec. 3015. CALFED stability program, California.
Sec. 3016. Compton Creek, California.
Sec. 3017. Grayson Creek/Murderer's Creek, California.
Sec. 3018. Hamilton Airfield, California.
Sec. 3019. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel, 
              California.
Sec. 3020. Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 3021. Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California.
Sec. 3022. Llagas Creek, California.
Sec. 3023. Magpie Creek, California.
Sec. 3024. Pacific Flyway Center, Sacramento, California.
Sec. 3025. Petaluma River, Petaluma, California.
Sec. 3026. Pinole Creek, California.
Sec. 3027. Prado Dam, California.
Sec. 3028. Redwood City Navigation Channel, California.
Sec. 3029. Sacramento and American Rivers flood control, California.
Sec. 3030. Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California.
Sec. 3031. Sacramento River bank protection, California.
Sec. 3032. Salton Sea restoration, California.
Sec. 3033. Santa Ana River Mainstem, California.
Sec. 3034. Santa Barbara Streams, Lower Mission Creek, California.
Sec. 3035. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 3036. Seven Oaks Dam, California.
Sec. 3037. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 3038. Walnut Creek Channel, California.
Sec. 3039. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California.
Sec. 3040. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase II, California.
Sec. 3041. Yuba River Basin project, California.
Sec. 3042. South Platte River basin, Colorado.
Sec. 3043. Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, 
              Delaware and Maryland.
Sec. 3044. St. George's Bridge, Delaware.
Sec. 3045. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 3046. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 3047. Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3048. Gasparilla and Estero Islands, Florida.
Sec. 3049. Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida.
Sec. 3050. Peanut Island, Florida.
Sec. 3051. Port Sutton, Florida.
Sec. 3052. Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida.
Sec. 3053. Tampa Harbor Cut B, Florida.
Sec. 3054. Allatoona Lake, Georgia.
Sec. 3055. Latham River, Glynn County, Georgia.
Sec. 3056. Dworshak Reservoir improvements, Idaho.
Sec. 3057. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 3058. Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois.
Sec. 3059. Cache River Levee, Illinois.
Sec. 3060. Chicago River, Illinois.
Sec. 3061. Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal dispersal barriers project, 
              Illinois.
Sec. 3062. Emiquon, Illinois.
Sec. 3063. Lasalle, Illinois.
Sec. 3064. Spunky Bottoms, Illinois.
Sec. 3065. Cedar Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3066. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3067. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 3068. Des Moines River and Greenbelt, Iowa.
Sec. 3069. Perry Creek, Iowa.
Sec. 3070. Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
Sec. 3071. Hickman Bluff stabilization, Kentucky.
Sec. 3072. Mcalpine Lock and Dam, Kentucky and Indiana.
Sec. 3073. Prestonsburg, Kentucky.
Sec. 3074. Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge 
              Parish Watershed.
Sec. 3075. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 3076. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, regional visitor center, 
              Louisiana.
Sec. 3077. Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, 
              Louisiana.
Sec. 3078. Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana.
Sec. 3079. Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.
Sec. 3080. Red River (J. Bennett Johnston) Waterway, Louisiana.
Sec. 3081. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana.
Sec. 3082. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet relocation assistance, 
              Louisiana.
Sec. 3083. Violet, Louisiana.
Sec. 3084. West bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
              Louisiana.
Sec. 3085. Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine.
Sec. 3086. Cumberland, Maryland.
Sec. 3087. Poplar Island, Maryland.
Sec. 3088. Detroit River shoreline, Detroit, Michigan.
Sec. 3089. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 3090. St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 3091. Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan.
Sec. 3092. Ada, Minnesota.
Sec. 3093. Duluth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota.
Sec. 3094. Grand Marais, Minnesota.
Sec. 3095. Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3096. Granite Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 3097. Knife River Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3098. Red Lake River, Minnesota.
Sec. 3099. Silver Bay, Minnesota.
Sec. 3100. Taconite Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3101. Two Harbors, Minnesota.
Sec. 3102. Deer Island, Harrison County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3103. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3104. Pearl River Basin, Mississippi.
Sec. 3105. Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.
Sec. 3106. L-15 levee, Missouri.
Sec. 3107. Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri.
Sec. 3108. River Des Peres, Missouri.
Sec. 3109. Lower Yellowstone project, Montana.
Sec. 3110. Yellowstone River and tributaries, Montana and North Dakota.
Sec. 3111. Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Sec. 3112. Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska.
Sec. 3113. Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska.
Sec. 3114. Lower Truckee River, McCarran Ranch, Nevada.
Sec. 3115. Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey.
Sec. 3116. Passaic River basin flood management, New Jersey.
Sec. 3117. Cooperative agreements, New Mexico.
Sec. 3118. Middle Rio Grande restoration, New Mexico.
Sec. 3119. Buffalo Harbor, New York.
Sec. 3120. Long Island Sound oyster restoration, New York and 
              Connecticut.
Sec. 3121. Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers watershed management, New 
              York.
Sec. 3122. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 3123. Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 3124. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 3125. Susquehanna River and Upper Delaware River watershed 
              management, New York.
Sec. 3126. Missouri River restoration, North Dakota.
Sec. 3127. Wahpeton, North Dakota.
Sec. 3128. Ohio.
Sec. 3129. Lower Girard Lake Dam, Girard, Ohio.
Sec. 3130. Mahoning River, Ohio.
Sec. 3131. Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3132. Arkansas River Corridor, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3133. Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3134. Oklahoma lakes demonstration program, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3135. Ottawa County, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3136. Red River chloride control, Oklahoma and Texas.

[[Page 21755]]

Sec. 3137. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3138. Upper Willamette River watershed ecosystem restoration, 
              Oregon.
Sec. 3139. Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware.
Sec. 3140. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3141. Sheraden Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
              Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3142. Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3143. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3144. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3145. Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.
Sec. 3146. Missouri River Restoration, South Dakota.
Sec. 3147. Cedar Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 3148. Freeport Harbor, Texas.
Sec. 3149. Lake Kemp, Texas.
Sec. 3150. Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas.
Sec. 3151. North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas.
Sec. 3152. Pat Mayse Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3153. Proctor Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3154. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas.
Sec. 3155. Connecticut River restoration, Vermont.
Sec. 3156. Dam remediation, Vermont.
Sec. 3157. Lake Champlain Eurasian milfoil, water chestnut, and other 
              nonnative plant control, Vermont.
Sec. 3158. Upper Connecticut River Basin wetland restoration, Vermont 
              and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3159. Upper Connecticut River basin ecosystem restoration, Vermont 
              and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3160. Lake Champlain watershed, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 3161. Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 3162. Tangier Island Seawall, Virginia.
Sec. 3163. Duwamish/Green, Washington.
Sec. 3164. McNary Lock and Dam, McNary National Wildlife Refuge, 
              Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3165. Snake River project, Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3166. Yakima River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington.
Sec. 3167. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3168. Greenbrier River basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3169. Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia.
Sec. 3170. Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia.
Sec. 3171. Mcdowell County, West Virginia.
Sec. 3172. Parkersburg, West Virginia.
Sec. 3173. Green Bay Harbor, Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3174. Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3175. Mississippi River headwaters reservoirs.
Sec. 3176. Upper basin of Missouri River.
Sec. 3177. Upper Mississippi River System environmental management 
              program.
Sec. 3178. Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation system new 
              technology pilot program.
Sec. 3179. Continuation of project authorizations.
Sec. 3180. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 3181. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 3182. Land conveyances.
Sec. 3183. Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
              restrictions.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 4001. John Glenn Great Lakes Basin Program.
Sec. 4002. Lake Erie dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 4003. Southwestern United States drought study.
Sec. 4004. Delaware River.
Sec. 4005. Eurasian milfoil.
Sec. 4006. Fire Island, Alaska.
Sec. 4007. Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 4008. Kuskokwim River, Alaska.
Sec. 4009. Nome Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4010. St. George Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4011. Susitna River, Alaska.
Sec. 4012. Valdez, Alaska.
Sec. 4013. Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
Sec. 4014. Searcy County, Arkansas.
Sec. 4015. Aliso Creek, California.
Sec. 4016. Fresno, Kings, and Kern counties, California.
Sec. 4017. Fruitvale Avenue Railroad Bridge, Alameda, California.
Sec. 4018. Los Angeles River revitalization study, California.
Sec. 4019. Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.
Sec. 4020. Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 4021. Orick, California.
Sec. 4022. Shoreline study, Oceanside, California.
Sec. 4023. Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California.
Sec. 4024. Sacramento River, California.
Sec. 4025. San Diego County, California.
Sec. 4026. San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
Sec. 4027. South San Francisco Bay Shoreline, California.
Sec. 4028. Twentynine Palms, California.
Sec. 4029. Yucca Valley, California.
Sec. 4030. Selenium studies, Colorado.
Sec. 4031. Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, 
              Wilmington, Delaware.
Sec. 4032. Delaware inland bays and tributaries and Atlantic coast, 
              Delaware.
Sec. 4033. Collier County Beaches, Florida.
Sec. 4034. Lower St. Johns River, Florida.
Sec. 4035. Herbert Hoover Dike supplemental major rehabilitation 
              report, Florida.
Sec. 4036. Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.
Sec. 4037. Meriwether County, Georgia.
Sec. 4038. Boise River, Idaho.
Sec. 4039. Ballard's Island Side Channel, Illinois.
Sec. 4040. Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4041. Salem, Indiana.
Sec. 4042. Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4043. Dewey Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4044. Louisville, Kentucky.
Sec. 4045. Vidalia Port, Louisiana.
Sec. 4046. Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
Sec. 4047. Clinton River, Michigan.
Sec. 4048. Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.
Sec. 4049. Lake Erie at Luna Pier, Michigan.
Sec. 4050. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Sec. 4051. Northeast Mississippi.
Sec. 4052. Dredged material disposal, New Jersey.
Sec. 4053. Bayonne, New Jersey.
Sec. 4054. Carteret, New Jersey.
Sec. 4055. Gloucester County, New Jersey.
Sec. 4056. Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
Sec. 4057. Batavia, New York.
Sec. 4058. Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
Sec. 4059. Finger Lakes, New York.
Sec. 4060. Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 4061. Newtown Creek, New York.
Sec. 4062. Niagara River, New York.
Sec. 4063. Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
Sec. 4064. Upper Delaware River watershed, New York.
Sec. 4065. Lincoln County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4066. Wilkes County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4067. Yadkinville, North Carolina.
Sec. 4068. Flood damage reduction, Ohio.
Sec. 4069. Lake Erie, Ohio.
Sec. 4070. Ohio River, Ohio.
Sec. 4071. Toledo Harbor dredged material placement, Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4072. Toledo Harbor, Maumee River, and Lake Channel project, 
              Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4073. Ecosystem restoration and fish passage improvements, Oregon.
Sec. 4074. Walla Walla River basin, Oregon.
Sec. 4075. Chartiers Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4076. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4077. Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction.
Sec. 4078. Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4079. Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4080. Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 4081. Woonsocket local protection project, Blackstone River basin, 
              Rhode Island.
Sec. 4082. Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina.
Sec. 4083. Broad River, York County, South Carolina.
Sec. 4084. Savannah River, South Carolina and Georgia.
Sec. 4085. Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Sec. 4086. Cleveland, Tennessee.
Sec. 4087. Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 4088. Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee.
Sec. 4089. Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 4090. Abilene, Texas.
Sec. 4091. Coastal Texas ecosystem protection and restoration, Texas.
Sec. 4092. Port of Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 4093. Grand County and Moab, Utah.
Sec. 4094. Southwestern Utah.
Sec. 4095. Ecosystem and hydropower generation dams, Vermont.
Sec. 4096. Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington.
Sec. 4097. Monongahela River Basin, Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 4098. Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4099. Johnsonville Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4100. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4101. Debris removal.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

Sec. 5001. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 5002. Watershed management.
Sec. 5003. Dam safety.
Sec. 5004. Structural integrity evaluations.
Sec. 5005. Flood mitigation priority areas.
Sec. 5006. Additional assistance for authorized projects.
Sec. 5007. Expedited completion of reports and construction for certain 
              projects.
Sec. 5008. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects.
Sec. 5009. Southeastern water resources assessment.
Sec. 5010. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 5011. Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration program.
Sec. 5012. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 5013. Great Lakes tributary models.
Sec. 5014. Great Lakes navigation and protection.
Sec. 5015. Saint Lawrence Seaway.
Sec. 5016. Upper Mississippi River dispersal barrier project.
Sec. 5017. Estuary restoration.

[[Page 21756]]

Sec. 5018. Missouri River and tributaries, mitigation, recovery, and 
              restoration, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, 
              North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
Sec. 5019. Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River basins, Delaware, 
              Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.
Sec. 5020. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
              program.
Sec. 5021. Chesapeake Bay oyster restoration, Virginia and Maryland.
Sec. 5022. Hypoxia assessment.
Sec. 5023. Potomac River watershed assessment and tributary strategy 
              evaluation and monitoring program.
Sec. 5024. Lock and dam security.
Sec. 5025. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake 
              River salmon survival.
Sec. 5026. Wage surveys.
Sec. 5027. Rehabilitation.
Sec. 5028. Auburn, Alabama.
Sec. 5029. Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama.
Sec. 5030. Alaska.
Sec. 5031. Barrow, Alaska.
Sec. 5032. Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
Sec. 5033. St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska.
Sec. 5034. Tanana River, Alaska.
Sec. 5035. Wrangell Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 5036. Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
Sec. 5037. Des Arc levee protection, Arkansas.
Sec. 5038. Loomis Landing, Arkansas.
Sec. 5039. California.
Sec. 5040. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, 
              Stockton, California.
Sec. 5041. Cambria, California.
Sec. 5042. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California; 
              Mallard Slough, Pittsburg, California.
Sec. 5043. Dana Point Harbor, California.
Sec. 5044. East San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 5045. Eastern Santa Clara basin, California.
Sec. 5046. LA-3 dredged material ocean disposal site designation, 
              California.
Sec. 5047. Lancaster, California.
Sec. 5048. Los Osos, California.
Sec. 5049. Pine Flat Dam fish and wildlife habitat, California.
Sec. 5050. Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel 
              Basin, California.
Sec. 5051. San Francisco, California.
Sec. 5052. San Francisco, California, waterfront area.
Sec. 5053. San Pablo Bay, California, watershed and Suisun Marsh 
              ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 5054. St. Helena, California.
Sec. 5055. Upper Calaveras River, Stockton, California.
Sec. 5056. Rio Grande environmental management program, Colorado, New 
              Mexico, and Texas.
Sec. 5057. Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, New Haven Harbor, 
              Connecticut.
Sec. 5058. Stamford, Connecticut.
Sec. 5059. Delmarva conservation corridor, Delaware, Maryland, and 
              Virginia.
Sec. 5060. Anacostia River, District of Columbia and Maryland.
Sec. 5061. East Central and Northeast Florida.
Sec. 5062. Florida Keys water quality improvements.
Sec. 5063. Lake Worth, Florida.
Sec. 5064. Big Creek, Georgia, watershed management and restoration 
              program.
Sec. 5065. Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District.
Sec. 5066. Savannah, Georgia.
Sec. 5067. Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, rural Utah, and 
              Wyoming.
Sec. 5068. Riley Creek Recreation Area, Idaho.
Sec. 5069. Floodplain mapping, Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5070. Reconstruction of Illinois and Missouri flood protection 
              projects.
Sec. 5071. Illinois River basin restoration.
Sec. 5072. Promontory Point third-party review, Chicago shoreline, 
              Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5073. Kaskaskia River basin, Illinois, restoration.
Sec. 5074. Southwest Illinois.
Sec. 5075. Calumet region, Indiana.
Sec. 5076. Floodplain mapping, Missouri River, Iowa.
Sec. 5077. Paducah, Kentucky.
Sec. 5078. Southern and eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 5079. Winchester, Kentucky.
Sec. 5080. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Sec. 5081. Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
Sec. 5082. East Atchafalaya basin and Amite River basin region, 
              Louisiana.
Sec. 5083. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project, Louisiana.
Sec. 5084. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 5085. Southeast Louisiana region, Louisiana.
Sec. 5086. West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 5087. Charlestown, Maryland.
Sec. 5088. St. Mary's River, Maryland.
Sec. 5089. Massachusetts dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 5090. Ontonagon Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 5091. Crookston, Minnesota.
Sec. 5092. Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota.
Sec. 5093. Itasca County, Minnesota.
Sec. 5094. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sec. 5095. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 5096. Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
Sec. 5097. Mississippi.
Sec. 5098. Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
Sec. 5099. Mississippi River, Missouri and Illinois.
Sec. 5100. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5101. St. Louis Regional Greenways, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5102. Missoula, Montana.
Sec. 5103. St. Mary project, Glacier County, Montana.
Sec. 5104. Lower Platte River watershed restoration, Nebraska.
Sec. 5105. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey.
Sec. 5106. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 5107. College Point, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5108. Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5109. Hudson River, New York.
Sec. 5110. Mount Morris Dam, New York.
Sec. 5111. North Hempstead and Glen Cove North Shore watershed 
              restoration, New York.
Sec. 5112. Rochester, New York.
Sec. 5113. North Carolina.
Sec. 5114. Stanly County, North Carolina.
Sec. 5115. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina.
Sec. 5116. Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sec. 5117. Ohio River basin environmental management.
Sec. 5118. Toussaint River navigation project, Carroll Township, Ohio.
Sec. 5119. Statewide comprehensive water planning, Oklahoma.
Sec. 5120. Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon.
Sec. 5121. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5122. Clinton County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5123. Kehly Run Dams, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5124. Lehigh River, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5125. Northeast Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5126. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 5127. Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 5128. Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina.
Sec. 5129. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and 
              terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, South Dakota.
Sec. 5130. East Tennessee.
Sec. 5131. Fritz Landing, Tennessee.
Sec. 5132. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee.
Sec. 5133. Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 5134. Nonconnah Weir, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 5135. Tennessee River partnership.
Sec. 5136. Town Creek, Lenoir City, Tennessee.
Sec. 5137. Upper Mississippi embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and 
              Mississippi.
Sec. 5138. Texas.
Sec. 5139. Bosque River watershed, Texas.
Sec. 5140. Dallas County region, Texas.
Sec. 5141. Dallas Floodway, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 5142. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 5143. Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
Sec. 5144. Onion Creek, Texas.
Sec. 5145. Connecticut River dams, Vermont.
Sec. 5146. Lake Champlain Canal, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 5147. Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.
Sec. 5148. Eastern Shore and Southwest Virginia.
Sec. 5149. James River, Virginia.
Sec. 5150. Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington.
Sec. 5151. Hamilton Island campground, Washington.
Sec. 5152. Erosion control, Puget Island, Wahkiakum County, Washington.
Sec. 5153. Willapa Bay, Washington.
Sec. 5154. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 5155. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 5156. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 5157. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
              interests.
Sec. 5158. Additional assistance for critical projects.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

Sec. 6001. Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida.
Sec. 6002. Pilot projects.
Sec. 6003. Maximum costs.
Sec. 6004. Credit.
Sec. 6005. Outreach and assistance.
Sec. 6006. Critical restoration projects.
Sec. 6007. Regional engineering model for environmental restoration.

                   TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

Sec. 7001. Definitions.
Sec. 7002. Comprehensive plan.
Sec. 7003. Louisiana coastal area.
Sec. 7004. Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task 
              Force.
Sec. 7005. Project modifications.
Sec. 7006. Construction.
Sec. 7007. Non-Federal cost share.
Sec. 7008. Project justification.
Sec. 7009. Independent review.
Sec. 7010. Expedited reports.
Sec. 7011. Reporting.
Sec. 7012. New Orleans and vicinity.
Sec. 7013. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet.
Sec. 7014. Hurricane and storm damage reduction.

[[Page 21757]]

Sec. 7015. Larose to Golden Meadow.
Sec. 7016. Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.

   TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

Sec. 8001. Definitions.
Sec. 8002. Navigation improvements and restoration.
Sec. 8003. Authorization of construction of navigation improvements.
Sec. 8004. Ecosystem restoration authorization.
Sec. 8005. Comparable progress.

                TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM

Sec. 9001. Short title.
Sec. 9002. Definitions.
Sec. 9003. Committee on Levee Safety.
Sec. 9004. Inventory and inspection of levees.
Sec. 9005. Limitations on statutory construction.
Sec. 9006. Authorization of appropriations.

     SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

       In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
     the Army.
                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

     SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

       Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following 
     projects for water resources development and conservation and 
     other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the 
     Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and 
     subject to the conditions, described in the respective 
     reports designated in this section:
       (1) Haines, alaska.--The project for navigation, Haines, 
     Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 
     2004, at a total cost of $14,040,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $11,232,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $2,808,000.
       (2) Port lions, alaska.--The project for navigation, Port 
     Lions, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 
     14, 2006, at a total cost of $9,530,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $7,624,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $1,906,000.
       (3) Santa cruz river, paseo de las iglesias, arizona.--The 
     project for environmental restoration, Santa Cruz River, Pima 
     County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 
     28, 2006, at a total cost of $97,700,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $63,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $34,400,000.
       (4) Tanque verde creek, pima county, arizona.--The project 
     for environmental restoration, Tanque Verde Creek, Pima 
     County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 
     22, 2003, at a total cost of $5,906,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $3,836,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $2,070,000.
       (5) Salt river (rio salado oeste), maricopa county, 
     arizona.--The project for environmental restoration, Salt 
     River (Rio Salado Oeste), Maricopa County, Arizona: Report of 
     the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total 
     cost of $166,650,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $106,629,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $60,021,000.
       (6) Salt river (va shly'ay akimel), maricopa county, 
     arizona.--
       (A) In general.--The project for environmental restoration, 
     Salt River (Va Shly'ay Akimel), Arizona: Report of the Chief 
     of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of 
     $162,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $105,200,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $56,900,000.
       (B) Coordination with federal reclamation projects.--The 
     Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable, shall 
     coordinate the design and construction of the project 
     described in subparagraph (A) with the Bureau of Reclamation 
     and any operating agent for any Federal reclamation project 
     in the Salt River Basin to avoid impacts to existing Federal 
     reclamation facilities and operations in the Salt River 
     Basin.
       (7) May branch, fort smith, arkansas.--The project for 
     flood damage reduction, May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas: 
     Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at 
     a total cost of $30,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
     of $15,010,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $15,840,000.
       (8) Hamilton city, glenn county, california.--The project 
     for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, 
     Hamilton City, Glenn County, California: Report of the Chief 
     of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of 
     $52,400,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $34,100,000 
     and estimated non-Federal cost of $18,300,000.
       (9) Silver strand shoreline, imperial beach, california.--
     The project for storm damage reduction, Silver Strand 
     Shoreline, Imperial Beach, California: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of 
     $13,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,521,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,179,000, and at an 
     estimated total cost of $42,500,000 for periodic beach 
     nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $21,250,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $21,250,000.
       (10) Matilija dam, ventura county, california.--The project 
     for environmental restoration, Matilija Dam, Ventura County, 
     California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 
     20, 2004, at a total cost of $144,500,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $89,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $54,800,000.
       (11) Middle creek, lake county, california.--The project 
     for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, 
     Middle Creek, Lake County, California: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated November 29, 2004, at a total cost of 
     $45,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $29,500,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,700,000.
       (12) Napa river salt marsh restoration, california.--
       (A) In general.--The project for environmental restoration, 
     Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration, Napa, California: Report 
     of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total 
     cost of $134,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $87,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $47,000,000.
       (B) Administration.--In carrying out the project authorized 
     by this paragraph, the Secretary shall--
       (i) construct a recycled water pipeline extending from the 
     Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District Waste Water 
     Treatment Plant and the Napa Sanitation District Waste Water 
     Treatment Plant to the project; and
       (ii) restore or enhance Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 2, and 3.
       (13) Denver county reach, south platte river, denver, 
     colorado.--The project for environmental restoration, Denver 
     County Reach, South Platte River, Denver, Colorado: Report of 
     the Chief of Engineers dated May 16, 2003, at a total cost of 
     $20,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,065,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,035,000.
       (14) Central and southern florida, indian river lagoon, 
     florida.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary may carry out the project 
     for ecosystem restoration, water supply, flood control, and 
     protection of water quality, Central and Southern Florida, 
     Indian River Lagoon, Florida, at a total cost of 
     $1,365,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $682,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $682,500,000, in accordance with section 601 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680) and the 
     recommendations of the report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
     August 6, 2004.
       (B) Deauthorizations.--The following projects are not 
     authorized after the date of enactment of this Act:
       (i) The uncompleted portions of the project for the C-44 
     Basin Storage Reservoir of the Comprehensive Everglades 
     Restoration Plan, authorized by section 601(b)(2)(C)(i) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2682), 
     at a total cost of $147,800,000, with an estimated Federal 
     cost of $73,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $73,900,000.
       (ii) The uncompleted portions of the Martin County, 
     Florida, modifications to the project for Central and 
     Southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at a total cost of 
     $15,471,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,073,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,398,000.
       (iii) The uncompleted portions of the East Coast 
     Backpumping, St. Lucie-Martin County, Spillway Structure S-
     311 modifications to the project for Central and Southern 
     Florida, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act 
     of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at a total cost of $77,118,000, with 
     an estimated Federal cost of $55,124,000 and an estimated 
     non-Federal cost of $21,994,000.
       (15) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan, central and 
     southern florida, picayune strand restoration project, 
     collier county, florida.--The project for ecosystem 
     restoration, Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, 
     Central and Southern Florida, Picayune Strand Restoration 
     Project, Collier County, Florida: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated September 15, 2005, at a total cost of 
     $375,330,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $187,665,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $187,665,000.
       (16) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan, central and 
     southern florida, site 1 impoundment project, palm beach 
     county, florida.--The project for ecosystem restoration, 
     Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, Central and 
     Southern Florida, Site 1 Impoundment Project, Palm Beach 
     County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
     December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $80,840,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $40,420,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $40,420,000.
       (17) Miami harbor, miami-dade county, florida.--
       (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Miami Harbor, 
     Miami-Dade County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
     dated April 25, 2005, at a total cost of $125,270,000, with 
     an estimated Federal cost of $75,140,000 and an estimated 
     non-Federal cost of $50,130,000.
       (B) General reevaluation report.--The non-Federal share of 
     the cost of the general reevaluation report that resulted in 
     the report of the Chief of Engineers referred to in 
     subparagraph (A) shall be the same percentage as the non-
     Federal share of cost of construction of the project.
       (C) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new 
     partnership with the non-Federal interest to reflect the cost 
     sharing required by subparagraph (B).
       (18) East st. louis and vicinity, illinois.--The project 
     for environmental restoration and recreation, East St. Louis 
     and Vicinity, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
     dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $208,260,000, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $134,910,000 and an 
     estimated non-Federal cost of $73,350,000.
       (19) Peoria riverfront development, illinois.--The project 
     for environmental restoration, Peoria Riverfront Development, 
     Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 28, 
     2003, at a total cost of $18,220,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $11,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $6,380,000.

[[Page 21758]]

       (20) Wood river levee system reconstruction, madison 
     county, illinois.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
     Wood River Levee System Reconstruction, Madison County, 
     Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 18, 
     2006, at a total cost of $17,220,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $11,193,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $6,027,000.
       (21) Des moines and raccoon rivers, des moines, iowa.--The 
     project for flood damage reduction, Des Moines and Raccoon 
     Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
     dated March 28, 2006, at a total cost of $10,780,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $6,967,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $3,813,000.
       (22) Licking river basin, cynthiana, kentucky.--The project 
     for flood damage reduction, Licking River Basin, Cynthiana, 
     Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 
     2006, at a total cost of $18,200,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $11,830,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $6,370,000.
       (23) Bayou sorrel lock, louisiana.--The project for 
     navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana: Report of the Chief 
     of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of 
     $9,600,000. The costs of construction of the project are to 
     be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund 
     of the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
     Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
       (24) Morganza to the gulf of mexico, louisiana.--
       (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
     reduction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana: Reports 
     of the Chief of Engineers dated August 23, 2002, and July 22, 
     2003, at a total cost of $886,700,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $576,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
     cost of $310,345,000.
       (B) Operation and maintenance.--The operation, maintenance, 
     repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of the Houma 
     Navigation Canal lock complex and the Gulf Intracoastal 
     Waterway floodgate features of the project described in 
     subparagraph (A) that provide for inland waterway 
     transportation shall be a Federal responsibility in 
     accordance with section 102 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2212).
       (25) Port of iberia, louisiana.--The project for 
     navigation, Port of Iberia, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
     $131,250,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $105,315,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,935,000; except that 
     the Secretary, in consultation with Vermillion and Iberia 
     Parishes, Louisiana, and consistent with the mitigation plan 
     in the report, shall use available dredged material and rock 
     placement on the south bank of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
     and the west bank of the Freshwater Bayou Channel to provide 
     incidental storm surge protection that does not adversely 
     affect the mitigation plan.
       (26) Smith island, somerset county, maryland.--The project 
     for environmental restoration, Smith Island, Somerset County, 
     Maryland: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 29, 
     2001, at a total cost of $15,580,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $10,127,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $5,453,000.
       (27) Roseau river, roseau, minnesota.--The project for 
     flood damage reduction, Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota: 
     Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at 
     a total cost of $25,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
     of $13,820,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $11,280,000.
       (28) Argentine, east bottoms, fairfax-jersey creek, and 
     north kansas levees units, missouri river and tributaries at 
     kansas cities, missouri and kansas.--The project for flood 
     damage reduction, Argentine, East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey 
     Creek, and North Kansas Levees units, Missouri River and 
     tributaries at Kansas Cities, Missouri and Kansas: Report of 
     the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total 
     cost of $65,430,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $42,530,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $22,900,000.
       (29) Swope park industrial area, blue river, kansas city, 
     missouri.--The project for flood damage reduction, Swope Park 
     Industrial Area, Blue River, Kansas City, Missouri: Report of 
     the Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total 
     cost of $16,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $11,037,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,943,000.
       (30) Great egg harbor inlet to townsends inlet, new 
     jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
     reduction, Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Townsends Inlet, New 
     Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 
     2006, at a total cost of $54,360,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $35,069,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $19,291,000, and at an estimated total cost of 
     $202,500,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
     of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $101,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $101,250,000.
       (31) Hudson raritan estuary, liberty state park, new 
     jersey.--
       (A) In general.--The project for environmental restoration, 
     Hudson Raritan Estuary, Liberty State Park, New Jersey: 
     Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 25, 2006, at a 
     total cost of $34,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $22,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,900,000.
       (B) Restoration teams.--In carrying out the project, the 
     Secretary shall establish and utilize watershed restoration 
     teams composed of estuary restoration experts from the Corps 
     of Engineers, the New Jersey department of environmental 
     protection, and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey 
     and other experts designated by the Secretary for the purpose 
     of developing habitat restoration and water quality 
     enhancement.
       (32) New jersey shore protection study, manasquan inlet to 
     barnegat inlet, new jersey.--The project for hurricane and 
     storm damage reduction, New Jersey Shore Protection Study, 
     Manasquan Inlet to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost 
     of $71,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $46,735,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,165,000, and at an 
     estimated total cost of $119,680,000 for periodic beach 
     nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $59,840,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $59,840,000.
       (33) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, union beach, new 
     jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
     reduction, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Union Beach, New 
     Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 4, 
     2006, at a total cost of $115,000,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $74,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $40,200,000, and at an estimated total cost of $6,500,000 
     for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
     project, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,250,000 and an 
     estimated non-Federal cost of $3,250,000.
       (34) South river, raritan river basin, new jersey.--The 
     project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
     environmental restoration, South River, Raritan River Basin, 
     New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 
     2003, at a total cost of $122,300,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $79,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $42,800,000.
       (35) Southwest valley, bernalillo county, new mexico.--The 
     project for flood damage reduction, Southwest Valley, 
     Bernalillo County, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated November 29, 2004, at a total cost of 
     $24,840,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $16,150,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,690,000.
       (36) Montauk point, new york.--The project for hurricane 
     and storm damage reduction, Montauk Point, New York: Report 
     of the Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 2006, at a total 
     cost of $14,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $7,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,300,000.
       (37) Hocking river basin, monday creek, ohio.--
       (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem restoration, 
     Hocking River Basin, Monday Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief 
     of Engineers dated August 24, 2006, at a total cost of 
     $20,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,440,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,540,000.
       (B) Wayne national forest.--
       (i) In general.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     Secretary of Agriculture, may construct other project 
     features on property that is located in the Wayne National 
     Forest, Ohio, owned by the United States and managed by the 
     Forest Service as described in the report of the Corps of 
     Engineers entitled ``Hocking River Basin, Ohio, Monday Creek 
     Sub-Basin Ecosystem Restoration Project Feasibility Report 
     and Environmental Assessment''.
       (ii) Cost.--Each project feature carried out on Federal 
     land shall be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained 
     at Federal expense.
       (iii) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to the Secretary of Agriculture to carry 
     out this subparagraph $1,270,000.
       (38) Town of bloomsburg, columbia county, pennsylvania.--
     The project for flood damage reduction, town of Bloomsburg, 
     Columbia County, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated January 25, 2006, at a total cost of 
     $44,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $28,925,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,575,000.
       (39) Pawleys island, south carolina.--The project for 
     hurricane and storm damage reduction, Pawleys Island, South 
     Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 
     2006, at a total cost of $8,980,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $5,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $3,140,000, and at an estimated total cost of $21,200,000 
     for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
     project, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,600,000 and an 
     estimated non-Federal cost of $10,600,000.
       (40) Corpus christi ship channel, corpus christi, texas.--
       (A) In general.--The project for navigation and ecosystem 
     restoration, Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas: Report of 
     the Chief of Engineers dated June 2, 2003, at a total cost of 
     $188,110,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $87,810,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $100,300,000.
       (B) Navigational servitude.--In carrying out the project 
     under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall enforce the 
     navigational servitude in the Corpus Christi Ship Channel 
     (including the removal or relocation of any facility 
     obstructing the project) consistent with the cost sharing 
     requirements of section 101 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).
       (41) Gulf intracoastal waterway, brazos river to port 
     o'connor, matagorda bay re-route, texas.--The project for 
     navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to Port 
     O'Connor, Matagorda Bay Re-Route, Texas: Report of the Chief 
     of Engineers dated December 24, 2002, at a total cost of 
     $17,280,000. The costs

[[Page 21759]]

     of construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from 
     amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury 
     and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways 
     Trust Fund.
       (42) Gulf intracoastal waterway, high island to brazos 
     river, texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal 
     Waterway, High Island to Brazos River, Texas: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost of 
     $14,450,000. The costs of construction of the project are to 
     be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund 
     of the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
     Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
       (43) Lower colorado river basin phase i, texas.--The 
     project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, 
     Lower Colorado River Basin Phase I, Texas: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost 
     of $110,730,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $69,640,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $41,090,000.
       (44) Atlantic intracoastal waterway bridge replacement, 
     deep creek, chesapeake, virginia.--The project for Atlantic 
     Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Replacement, Deep Creek, 
     Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
     March 3, 2003, at a total cost of $37,200,000.
       (45) Craney island eastward expansion, norfolk harbor and 
     channels, hampton roads, virginia.--
       (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Craney Island 
     Eastward Expansion, Norfolk Harbor and Channels, Hampton 
     Roads, Virginia: Report of Chief of Engineers dated October 
     24, 2006, at a total cost of $712,103,000.
       (B) Non-federal share.--Notwithstanding sections 101 and 
     103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
     2211 and 2213), the Federal share of the cost of the project 
     shall be 50 percent.
       (46) Centralia, chehalis river, lewis county, washington.--
       (A) In general.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
     Centralia, Chehalis River, Lewis County, Washington: Report 
     of the Chief of Engineers dated September 27, 2004, at a 
     total cost of $123,770,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $74,740,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $49,030,000.
       (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall--
       (i) credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the project up to $6,500,000 for 
     the cost of planning and design work carried out by the non-
     Federal interest in accordance with the project study plan 
     dated November 28, 1999; and
       (ii) credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of design and construction work carried out 
     by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
     determines that the work is integral to the project.

     SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
     each of the following projects and, if the Secretary 
     determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the 
     project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
     (33 U.S.C. 701s):
       (1) Haleyville, alabama.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Haleyville, Alabama.
       (2) Weiss lake, alabama.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Weiss Lake, Alabama.
       (3) Fort yukon, alaska.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Fort Yukon, Alaska.
       (4) Little colorado river levee, arizona.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Little Colorado River Levee, Arizona.
       (5) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas.
       (6) Barrel springs wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Barrel Springs Wash, Palmdale, 
     California.
       (7) Borrego springs, california.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Borrego Springs, California.
       (8) Colton, california.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Colton, California.
       (9) Dunlap stream, yucaipa, california.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, Dunlap Stream, Yucaipa, California.
       (10) Hunts canyon wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Hunts Canyon Wash, Palmdale, 
     California.
       (11) Ontario and chino, california.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, Ontario and Chino, California.
       (12) Santa venetia, california.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Santa Venetia, California.
       (13) Whittier, california.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Whittier, California.
       (14) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, California.
       (15) Bibb county and city of macon levee, georgia.--Project 
     for flood damage reduction, Bibb County and City of Macon 
     Levee, Georgia.
       (16) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, St. Mary's and Maumee Rivers, Fort Wayne 
     and vicinity, Indiana.
       (17) St. francisville, lousiana.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, St. Francisville, Louisiana.
       (18) Salem, massachusetts.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Salem, Massachusetts.
       (19) Cass river, michigan.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Cass River, Vassar and vicinity, Michigan.
       (20) Crow river, rockford, minnesota.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota.
       (21) Marsh creek, minnesota.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota.
       (22) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, 
     minnesota.--Project for flood damage reduction, South Branch 
     of the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota.
       (23) Blacksnake creek, st. joseph, missouri.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, 
     Missouri.
       (24) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New 
     Jersey.
       (25) Canisteo river, addison, new york.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, Canisteo River, Addison, New York.
       (26) Cohocton river, campbell, new york.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, Cohocton River, Campbell, New York.
       (27) Dry and otter creeks, cortland, new york.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland, New 
     York.
       (28) East river, silver beach, new york city, new york.--
     Project for flood damage reduction, East River, Silver Beach, 
     New York City, New York.
       (29) East valley creek, andover, new york.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, East Valley Creek, Andover, New York.
       (30) Sunnyside brook, westchester county, new york.--
     Project for flood damage reduction, Sunnyside Brook, 
     Westchester County, New York.
       (31) Little yankee and mud run, trumbull county, ohio.--
     Project for flood damage reduction, Little Yankee and Mud 
     Run, Trumbull County, Ohio.
       (32) Little neshaminy creek, warrington, pennsylvania.--
     Project for flood damage reduction, Little Neshaminy Creek, 
     Warrington, Pennsylvania.
       (33) Southampton creek watershed, southampton, 
     pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
     Southampton Creek watershed, Southampton, Pennsylvania.
       (34) Spring creek, lower macungie township, pennsylvania.--
     Project for flood damage reduction, Spring Creek, Lower 
     Macungie Township, Pennsylvania.
       (35) Yardley aqueduct, silver and brock creeks, yardley, 
     pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Yardley 
     Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, Yardley, Pennsylvania.
       (36) Surfside beach, south carolina.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, Surfside Beach and vicinity, South 
     Carolina.
       (37) Sandy creek, jackson county, tennessee.--A project for 
     flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, Jackson County, 
     Tennessee.
       (38) Congelosi ditch, missouri city, texas.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, 
     Texas.
       (39) Dilley, texas.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
     Dilley, Texas.
       (40) Cheyenne, wyoming.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
       (b) Special Rules.--
       (1) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--The Secretary may 
     proceed with the project for the Cache River Basin, Grubbs, 
     Arkansas, referred to in subsection (a)(5), notwithstanding 
     that the project is located within the boundaries of the 
     flood control project, Cache River Basin, Arkansas and 
     Missouri, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act 
     of 1950, (64 Stat. 172) and modified by section 99 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41).
       (2) Ontario and chino, california.--The Secretary shall 
     carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Ontario and 
     Chino, California, referred to in subsection (a)(11) if the 
     Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
       (3) Santa venetia, california.--The Secretary shall carry 
     out the project for flood damage reduction, Santa Venetia, 
     California, referred to in subsection (a)(12) if the 
     Secretary determines that the project is feasible and shall 
     allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
     financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) 
     to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that 
     applying such section is necessary to implement the project.
       (4) Whittier, california.--The Secretary shall carry out 
     the project for flood damage reduction, Whittier, California, 
     referred to in subsection (a)(13) if the Secretary determines 
     that the project is feasible.
       (5) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--The Secretary 
     shall review the locally prepared plan for the project for 
     flood damage, Wildwood Creek, California, referred to in 
     subsection (a)(14) and, if the Secretary determines that the 
     plan meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps 
     of Engineers and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary may 
     use the plan to carry out the project and shall provide 
     credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project for the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
     to the project.
       (6) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.--In carrying out the 
     project for flood damage reduction, St. Mary's and Maumee 
     Rivers, Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana, referred to in 
     subsection (a)(16) the Secretary shall--
       (A) provide a 100-year level of flood protection at the 
     Berry Thieme, Park-Thompson, Woodhurst, and Tillman sites 
     along the St. Mary's River; and
       (B) allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
     financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of 
     the Water Resources

[[Page 21760]]

     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that 
     the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such 
     section is necessary to implement the project.
       (7) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, 
     minnesota.--In carrying out the project for flood damage 
     reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, 
     Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a)(22) the Secretary 
     may consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in 
     determining the Federal interest in the project and shall 
     allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
     financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) 
     to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that 
     applying such section is necessary to implement the project.
       (8) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--The Secretary 
     shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Acid 
     Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey, referred to in subsection 
     (a)(24) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     feasible.
       (9) Sandy creek, tennessee.--Consistent with the report of 
     the Chief of Engineers dated March 24, 1948, on the West 
     Tennessee Tributaries project, in carrying out the project 
     for flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, Tennessee, referred 
     to in section (a)(37)--
       (A) Sandy Creek shall not be considered to be an authorized 
     channel of the West Tennessee Tributaries project; and
       (B) the project shall not be considered to be part of the 
     West Tennessee Tributaries project.
       (10) Dilley, texas.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
     project for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas, referred 
     to in subsection (a)(39) if the Secretary determines that the 
     project is feasible.

     SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK 
                   PROTECTION.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
     following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
     project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
     14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
       (1) Aliso creek, california.--Projects for emergency 
     streambank protection, Aliso Creek, California.
       (2) St. johns bluff training wall, duval county, florida.--
     Project for emergency streambank protection, St. Johns Bluff 
     Training Wall, Duval County, Florida.
       (3) Gulf intracoastal waterway, iberville parish, 
     louisiana.--Projects for emergency streambank protection, 
     Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Iberville Parish, Louisiana.
       (4) Ouachita and black rivers, arkansas and louisiana.--
     Projects for emergency streambank protection, Ouachita and 
     Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana.
       (5) Piney point lighthouse, st. mary's county, maryland.--
     Project for emergency streambank protection, Piney Point 
     Lighthouse, St. Mary's County, Maryland.
       (6) Pug hole lake, minnesota.--Project for emergency 
     streambank protection, Pug Hole Lake, Minnesota.
       (7) Middle fork grand river, gentry county, missouri.--
     Project for emergency streambank protection, Middle Fork 
     Grand River, Gentry County, Missouri.
       (8) Platte river, platte city, missouri.--Project for 
     emergency streambank protection, Platte River, Platte City, 
     Missouri.
       (9) Rush creek, parkville, missouri.--Project for emergency 
     streambank protection, Rush Creek, Parkville, Missouri, 
     including measures to address degradation of the creek bed.
       (10) Dry and otter creeks, cortland county, new york.--
     Project for emergency streambank protection, Dry and Otter 
     Creeks, Cortland County, New York.
       (11) Keuka lake, hammondsport, new york.--Project for 
     emergency streambank protection, Keuka Lake, Hammondsport, 
     New York.
       (12) Kowawese unique area and hudson river, new windsor, 
     new york.--Project for emergency streambank protection, 
     Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.
       (13) Owego creek, tioga county, new york.--Project for 
     emergency streambank protection, Owego Creek, Tioga County, 
     New York.
       (14) Howard road outfall, shelby county, tennessee.--
     Project for emergency streambank protection, Howard Road 
     outfall, Shelby County, Tennessee.
       (15) Mitch farm ditch and lateral d, shelby county, 
     tennessee.--Project for emergency streambank protection, 
     Mitch Farm Ditch and Lateral D, Shelby County, Tennessee.
       (16) Wolf river tributaries, shelby county, tennessee.--
     Project for emergency streambank protection, Wolf River 
     tributaries, Shelby County, Tennessee.
       (17) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--Project for 
     emergency streambank protection, Johnson Creek, Arlington, 
     Texas.
       (18) Wells river, newbury, vermont.--Project for emergency 
     streambank protection, Wells River, Newbury, Vermont.

     SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
     each of the following projects and, if the Secretary 
     determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the 
     project under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 
     (33 U.S.C. 577):
       (1) Barrow harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Barrow 
     Harbor, Alaska.
       (2) Coffman cove, alaska.--Project for navigation, Coffman 
     Cove, Alaska.
       (3) Kotzebue harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, 
     Kotzebue Harbor, Alaska.
       (4) Nome harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Nome 
     Harbor, Alaska.
       (5) Old harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Old 
     Harbor, Alaska.
       (6) Little rock port, arkansas.--Project for navigation, 
     Little Rock Port, Arkansas River, Arkansas.
       (7) Mississippi river ship channel, louisiana.--Project for 
     navigation, Mississippi River Ship Channel, Louisiana.
       (8) East basin, cape cod canal, sandwich, massachusetts.--
     Project for navigation, East Basin, Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, 
     Massachusetts.
       (9) Lynn harbor, lynn, massachusetts.--Project for 
     navigation, Lynn Harbor, Lynn, Massachusetts.
       (10) Merrimack river, haverhill, massachusetts.--Project 
     for navigation, Merrimack River, Haverhill, Massachusetts.
       (11) Oak bluffs harbor, oak bluffs, massachusetts.--Project 
     for navigation, Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts.
       (12) Woods hole great harbor, falmouth, massachusetts.--
     Project for navigation, Woods Hole Great Harbor, Falmouth, 
     Massachusetts.
       (13) Au sable river, michigan.--Project for navigation, Au 
     Sable River in the vicinity of Oscoda, Michigan.
       (14) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
     Clinton River, Michigan.
       (15) Ontonagon river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
     Ontonagon River, Ontonagon, Michigan.
       (16) Outer channel and inner harbor, menominee harbor, 
     michigan and wisconsin.--Project for navigation, Outer 
     Channel and Inner Harbor, Menominee Harbor, Michigan and 
     Wisconsin.
       (17) Sebewaing river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
     Sebewaing River, Michigan.
       (18) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, michigan.--
     Project for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Traverse City, 
     Michigan.
       (19) Tower harbor, tower, minnesota.--Project for 
     navigation, Tower Harbor, Tower, Minnesota.
       (20) Olcott harbor, olcott, new york.--Project for 
     navigation, Olcott Harbor, Olcott, New York.
       (21) Milwaukee harbor, wisconsin.--Project for navigation, 
     Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
       (b) Special Rules.--
       (1) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, michigan.--The 
     Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan for the 
     project for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Michigan, 
     referred to in subsection (a)(18), and, if the Secretary 
     determines that the plan meets the evaluation and design 
     standards of the Corps of Engineers and that the plan is 
     feasible, the Secretary may use the plan to carry out the 
     project and shall provide credit toward the non-Federal share 
     of the cost of the project for the cost of work carried out 
     by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
     determines that the work is integral to the project.
       (2) Tower harbor, tower minnesota.--The Secretary shall 
     carry out the project for navigation, Tower Harbor, Tower, 
     Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a)(19) if the Secretary 
     determines that the project is feasible.

     SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 
                   THE ENVIRONMENT.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
     following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
     project is appropriate, may carry out the project under 
     section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 2309a):
       (1) Ballona creek, los angeles county, california.--Project 
     for improvement of the quality of the environment, Ballona 
     Creek, Los Angeles County, California.
       (2) Ballona lagoon tide gates, marina del rey, 
     california.--Project for improvement of the quality of the 
     environment, Ballona Lagoon Tide Gates, Marina Del Rey, 
     California.
       (3) Ft. george inlet, duval county, florida.--Project for 
     improvement of the quality of the environment, Ft. George 
     Inlet, Duval County, Florida.
       (4) Rathbun lake, iowa.--Project for improvement of the 
     quality of the environment, Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
       (5) Smithville lake, missouri.--Project for improvement of 
     the quality of the environment, Smithville Lake, Missouri.
       (6) Delaware bay, new jersey and delaware.--Project for 
     improvement of the quality of the environment, Delaware Bay, 
     New Jersey and Delaware, for the purpose of oyster 
     restoration.
       (7) Tioga-hammond lakes, pennsylvania.--Project for 
     improvement of the quality of the environment, Tioga-Hammond 
     Lakes, Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
     each of the following projects and, if the Secretary 
     determines that a project is appropriate, may carry out the 
     project under section 206 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
       (1) Cypress creek, montgomery, alabama.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cypress Creek, Montgomery, 
     Alabama.
       (2) Black lake, alaska.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Black Lake, Alaska, at the head of the Chignik 
     watershed.
       (3) Ben lomond dam, santa cruz, california.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ben Lomond Dam, Santa Cruz, 
     California.
       (4) Dockweiler bluffs, los angeles county, california.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem

[[Page 21761]]

     restoration, Dockweiler Bluffs, Los Angeles County, 
     California.
       (5) Salt river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Salt River, California.
       (6) San diego river, california.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, San Diego River, California, including 
     efforts to address aquatic nuisance species.
       (7) Santa rosa creek, santa rosa, california.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Santa Rosa Creek in the 
     vicinity of the Prince Memorial Greenway, Santa Rosa, 
     California.
       (8) Stockton deep water ship channel and lower san joaquin 
     river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel and lower San 
     Joaquin River, California.
       (9) Suisun marsh, san pablo bay, california.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Suisun Marsh, San Pablo Bay, 
     California.
       (10) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, california.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sweetwater 
     Reservoir, San Diego County, California, including efforts to 
     address aquatic nuisance species.
       (11) Biscayne bay, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Biscayne Bay, Key Biscayne, Florida.
       (12) Clam bayou and dinkins bayou, sanibel island, 
     florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Clam 
     Bayou and Dinkins Bayou, Sanibel Island, Florida.
       (13) Mountain park, georgia.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Mountain Park, Georgia.
       (14) Chattahoochee fall line, georgia and alabama.--Project 
     for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Chattahoochee Fall Line, 
     Georgia and Alabama.
       (15) Longwood cove, gainesville, georgia.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Longwood Cove, Gainesville, 
     Georgia.
       (16) City park, university lakes, louisiana.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, City Park, University Lakes, 
     Louisiana.
       (17) Lawrence gateway, massachusetts.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration at the Lawrence Gateway quadrant 
     project along the Merrimack and Spicket Rivers in Lawrence, 
     Massachusetts, in accordance with the general conditions 
     established by the project approval of the Environmental 
     Protection Agency, Region I, including filling abandoned 
     drainage facilities and making improvements to the drainage 
     system on the Lawrence Gateway to prevent continued migration 
     of contaminated sediments into the river systems.
       (18) Milford pond, milford, massachusetts.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Milford Pond, Milford, 
     Massachusetts.
       (19) Mill pond, littleton, massachusetts.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mill Pond, Littleton, 
     Massachusetts.
       (20) Pine tree brook, milton, massachusetts.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pine Tree Brook, Milton, 
     Massachusetts.
       (21) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Clinton River, Michigan.
       (22) Kalamazoo river watershed, battle creek, michigan.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Kalamazoo River 
     watershed, Battle Creek, Michigan.
       (23) Rush lake, minnesota.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Rush Lake, Minnesota.
       (24) South fork of the crow river, hutchinson, minnesota.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, South Fork of the 
     Crow River, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
       (25) St. louis, missouri.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, St. Louis, Missouri.
       (26) Mobley dam, tongue river, montana.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mobley Dam, Tongue River, 
     Montana.
       (27) S and h dam, tongue river, montana.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, S and H Dam, Tongue River, 
     Montana.
       (28) Vandalia dam, milk river, montana.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Vandalia Dam, Milk River, 
     Montana.
       (29) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, Reno, Nevada, including 
     features for fish passage in Washoe County.
       (30) Grover's mill pond, new jersey.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Grover's Mill Pond, New Jersey.
       (31) Caldwell county, north carolina.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Caldwell County, North Carolina.
       (32) Mecklenburg county, north carolina.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mecklenburg County, North 
     Carolina.
       (33) Dugway creek, bratenahl, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Dugway Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio.
       (34) Johnson creek, gresham, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Johnson Creek, Gresham, Oregon.
       (35) Beaver creek, beaver and salem, pennsylvania.--Project 
     for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Beaver Creek, Beaver and 
     Salem, Pennsylvania.
       (36) Cementon dam, lehigh river, pennsylvania.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cementon Dam, Lehigh River, 
     Pennsylvania.
       (37) Ingham spring dam, solebury township, pennsylvania.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ingham Spring Dam, 
     Solebury Township, Pennsylvania.
       (38) Saucon creek, northampton county, pennsylvania.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Saucon Creek, 
     Northampton County, Pennsylvania.
       (39) Stillwater lake dam, monroe county, pennsylvania.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Stillwater Lake 
     Dam, Monroe County, Pennsylvania.
       (40) Blackstone river, rhode island.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Blackstone River, Rhode Island.
       (41) Wilson branch, cheraw, south carolina.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wilson Branch, Cheraw, South 
     Carolina.
       (42) White river, bethel, vermont.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, White River, Bethel, Vermont.
       (43) College lake, lynchburg, virginia.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, College Lake, Lynchburg, 
     Virginia.
       (b) Special Rules.--
       (1) Black lake, alaska.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
     project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Black Lake, Alaska 
     referred to in subsection (a)(2) if the Secretary determines 
     that the project is appropriate.
       (2) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--The maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be expended for the project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, Reno, Nevada, 
     referred to in subsection (a)(29) shall be $6,000,000 and the 
     Secretary shall carry out the project if the Secretary 
     determines that the project is appropriate.
       (3) Blackstone river, rhode island.--The Secretary shall 
     carry out the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
     Blackstone River, Rhode Island, referred to in subsection 
     (a)(40) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     appropriate.
       (4) College lake, lynchburg, virginia.--The Secretary shall 
     carry out the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
     College Lake, Lynchburg, Virginia, referred to in subsection 
     (a)(43) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     appropriate.

     SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
     following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
     project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
     3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
     participation in the cost of protecting the shores of 
     publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
     U.S.C. 426g):
       (1) Nelson lagoon, alaska.--Project for shoreline 
     protection, Nelson Lagoon, Alaska.
       (2) Nicholas canyon, los angeles, california.--Project for 
     shoreline protection, Nicholas Canyon, Los Angeles, 
     California.
       (3) Sanibel island, florida.--Project for shoreline 
     protection, Sanibel Island, Florida.
       (4) Apra harbor, guam.--Project for shoreline protection, 
     Apra Harbor, Guam.
       (5) Piti, cabras island, guam.--Project for shoreline 
     protection, Piti, Cabras Island, Guam.
       (6) Narrows and gravesend bay, upper new york bay, 
     brooklyn, new york.--Project for shoreline protection in the 
     vicinity of the confluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, 
     Upper New York Bay, Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New 
     York.
       (7) Delaware river, philadelphia naval shipyard, 
     pennsylvania.--Project for shoreline protection, Delaware 
     River in the vicinity of the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 
     Pennsylvania.
       (8) Port aransas, texas.--Project for shoreline protection, 
     Port Aransas, Texas.

     SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following 
     project and, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project under 
     section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 (33 
     U.S.C. 701g): Project for removal of snags and clearing and 
     straightening of channels for flood control, Kowawese Unique 
     Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.

     SEC. 1009. SMALL PROJECTS TO PREVENT OR MITIGATE DAMAGE 
                   CAUSED BY NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
     following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
     project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
     111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i):
       (1) Tybee Island, Georgia.
       (2) Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana.

     SEC. 1010. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a 
     project for aquatic nuisance plant control in the Republican 
     River Basin, Nebraska, under section 104 of the River and 
     Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610).
       (b) Special Rule.--In carrying out the project under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary may control and eradicate 
     riverine nuisance plants.
                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

     SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.

       Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(n) Non-Federal Contributions.--
       ``(1) Prohibition on solicitation of excess 
     contributions.--The Secretary may not--
       ``(A) solicit contributions from non-Federal interests for 
     costs of constructing authorized water resources projects or 
     measures in excess of the non-Federal share assigned to the 
     appropriate project purposes listed in subsections (a), (b), 
     and (c); or
       ``(B) condition Federal participation in such projects or 
     measures on the receipt of such contributions.

[[Page 21762]]

       ``(2) Limitation on statutory construction.--Nothing in 
     this subsection shall be construed to affect the Secretary's 
     authority under section 903(c).''.

     SEC. 2002. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

       Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     2000 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 119 Stat. 2169; 
     120 Stat. 318; 120 Stat. 3197) is amended by striking 
     ``2008'' and inserting ``2009''.

     SEC. 2003. WRITTEN AGREEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

       (a) In General.--Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``sec. 221.'' and inserting the following:

     ``SEC. 221. WRITTEN AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES 
                   PROJECTS.'';

       (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
       ``(a) Cooperation of Non-Federal Interest.--
       ``(1) In general.--After December 31, 1970, the 
     construction of any water resources project, or an acceptable 
     separable element thereof, by the Secretary of the Army, 
     acting through the Chief of Engineers, or by a non-Federal 
     interest where such interest will be reimbursed for such 
     construction under any provision of law, shall not be 
     commenced until each non-Federal interest has entered into a 
     written partnership agreement with the Secretary (or, where 
     appropriate, the district engineer for the district in which 
     the project will be carried out) under which each party 
     agrees to carry out its responsibilities and requirements for 
     implementation or construction of the project or the 
     appropriate element of the project, as the case may be; 
     except that no such agreement shall be required if the 
     Secretary determines that the administrative costs associated 
     with negotiating, executing, or administering the agreement 
     would exceed the amount of the contribution required from the 
     non-Federal interest and are less than $25,000.
       ``(2) Liquidated damages.--A partnership agreement 
     described in paragraph (1) may include a provision for 
     liquidated damages in the event of a failure of one or more 
     parties to perform.
       ``(3) Obligation of future appropriations.--In any 
     partnership agreement described in paragraph (1) and entered 
     into by a State, or a body politic of the State which derives 
     its powers from the State constitution, or a governmental 
     entity created by the State legislature, the agreement may 
     reflect that it does not obligate future appropriations for 
     such performance and payment when obligating future 
     appropriations would be inconsistent with constitutional or 
     statutory limitations of the State or a political subdivision 
     of the State.
       ``(4) Credit for in-kind contributions.--
       ``(A) In general.--A partnership agreement described in 
     paragraph (1) may provide with respect to a project that the 
     Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project, including a project implemented without 
     specific authorization in law, the value of in-kind 
     contributions made by the non-Federal interest, including--
       ``(i) the costs of planning (including data collection), 
     design, management, mitigation, construction, and 
     construction services that are provided by the non-Federal 
     interest for implementation of the project;
       ``(ii) the value of materials or services provided before 
     execution of the partnership agreement, including efforts on 
     constructed elements incorporated into the project; and
       ``(iii) the value of materials and services provided after 
     execution of the partnership agreement.
       ``(B) Condition.--The Secretary may credit an in-kind 
     contribution under subparagraph (A) only if the Secretary 
     determines that the material or service provided as an in-
     kind contribution is integral to the project.
       ``(C) Work performed before partnership agreement.--In any 
     case in which the non-Federal interest is to receive credit 
     under subparagraph (A)(ii) for the cost of work carried out 
     by the non-Federal interest and such work has not been 
     carried out as of the date of enactment of this subparagraph, 
     the Secretary and the non-Federal interest shall enter into 
     an agreement under which the non-Federal interest shall carry 
     out such work, and only work carried out following the 
     execution of the agreement shall be eligible for credit.
       ``(D) Limitations.--Credit authorized under this paragraph 
     for a project--
       ``(i) shall not exceed the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     the project;
       ``(ii) shall not alter any other requirement that a non-
     Federal interest provide lands, easements, relocations, 
     rights-of-way, or areas for disposal of dredged material for 
     the project;
       ``(iii) shall not alter any requirement that a non-Federal 
     interest pay a portion of the costs of construction of the 
     project under sections 101 and 103 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211; 33 U.S.C. 2213); and
       ``(iv) shall not exceed the actual and reasonable costs of 
     the materials, services, or other things provided by the non-
     Federal interest, as determined by the Secretary.
       ``(E) Applicability.--
       ``(i) In general.--This paragraph shall apply to water 
     resources projects authorized after November 16, 1986, 
     including projects initiated after November 16, 1986, without 
     specific authorization in law.
       ``(ii) Limitation.--In any case in which a specific 
     provision of law provides for a non-Federal interest to 
     receive credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a 
     study for, or construction or operation and maintenance of, a 
     water resources project, the specific provision of law shall 
     apply instead of this paragraph.''.
       (b) Non-Federal Interest.--Section 221(b) of such Act is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(b) Definition of Non-Federal Interest.--The term `non-
     Federal interest' means--
       ``(1) a legally constituted public body (including a 
     federally recognized Indian tribe); or
       ``(2) a nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected 
     local government,
     that has full authority and capability to perform the terms 
     of its agreement and to pay damages, if necessary, in the 
     event of failure to perform.''.
       (c) Program Administration.--Section 221 of such Act is 
     further amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (h); and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
       ``(e) Delegation of Authority.--Not later than June 30, 
     2008, the Secretary shall issue policies and guidelines for 
     partnership agreements that delegate to the district 
     engineers, at a minimum--
       ``(1) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
     agreement that has appeared in an agreement previously 
     approved by the Secretary;
       ``(2) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
     agreement the specific terms of which are dictated by law or 
     by a final feasibility study, final environmental impact 
     statement, or other final decision document for a water 
     resources project;
       ``(3) the authority to approve any partnership agreement 
     that complies with the policies and guidelines issued by the 
     Secretary; and
       ``(4) the authority to sign any partnership agreement for 
     any water resources project unless, within 30 days of the 
     date of authorization of the project, the Secretary notifies 
     the district engineer in which the project will be carried 
     out that the Secretary wishes to retain the prerogative to 
     sign the partnership agreement for that project.
       ``(f) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
     date of enactment of this subsection, and every year 
     thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 
     detailing the following:
       ``(1) The number of partnership agreements signed by 
     district engineers and the number of partnership agreements 
     signed by the Secretary.
       ``(2) For any partnership agreement signed by the 
     Secretary, an explanation of why delegation to the district 
     engineer was not appropriate.
       ``(g) Public Availability.--Not later than 120 days after 
     the date of enactment of this subsection, the Chief of 
     Engineers shall--
       ``(1) ensure that each district engineer has made available 
     to the public, including on the Internet, all partnership 
     agreements entered into under this section within the 
     preceding 10 years and all partnership agreements for water 
     resources projects currently being carried out in that 
     district; and
       ``(2) make each partnership agreement entered into after 
     such date of enactment available to the public, including on 
     the Internet, not later than 7 days after the date on which 
     such agreement is entered into.''.
       (d) Local Cooperation.--Section 912(b) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (101 Stat. 4190) is 
     amended--
       (1) in paragraph (2)--
       (A) by striking ``shall'' the first place it appears and 
     inserting ``may''; and
       (B) by striking the last sentence; and
       (2) in paragraph (4)--
       (A) by inserting after ``injunction, for'' the following: 
     ``payment of damages or, for'';
       (B) by striking ``to collect a civil penalty imposed under 
     this section,''; and
       (C) by striking ``any civil penalty imposed under this 
     section,'' and inserting ``any damages,''.
       (e) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a), 
     (b), and (d) only apply to partnership agreements entered 
     into after the date of enactment of this Act; except that, at 
     the request of a non-Federal interest for a project, the 
     district engineer for the district in which the project is 
     located may amend a project partnership agreement entered 
     into on or before such date and under which construction on 
     the project has not been initiated as of such date of 
     enactment for the purpose of incorporating such amendments.
       (f) Agreements and References.--
       (1) In general.--A goal of agreements entered into under 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b) shall be to further partnership and cooperation, 
     and the agreements shall be referred to as ``partnership 
     agreements''.
       (2) References to cooperation agreements.--Any reference in 
     a law, regulation, document, or other paper of the United 
     States to a ``cooperation agreement'' or ``project 
     cooperation agreement'' shall be deemed to be a reference to 
     a ``partnership agreement'' or a ``project partnership 
     agreement'', respectively.
       (3) References to partnership agreements.--Any reference to 
     a ``partnership agreement'' or ``project partnership 
     agreement'' in this Act (other than this section) shall be 
     deemed to be a reference to a ``cooperation agreement'' or a 
     ``project cooperation agreement'', respectively.

     SEC. 2004. COMPILATION OF LAWS.

       (a) Compilation of Laws Enacted After November 8, 1966.--
     The Secretary and the Chief of Engineers shall prepare a 
     compilation

[[Page 21763]]

     of the laws of the United States relating to the improvement 
     of rivers and harbors, flood damage reduction, beach and 
     shoreline erosion, hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
     ecosystem and environmental restoration, and other water 
     resources development enacted after November 8, 1966, and 
     before January 1, 2008, and have such compilation printed for 
     the use of the Department of the Army, Congress, and the 
     general public.
       (b) Reprint of Laws Enacted Before November 8, 1966.--The 
     Secretary shall have the volumes containing the laws referred 
     to in subsection (a) enacted before November 8, 1966, 
     reprinted.
       (c) Index.--The Secretary shall include an index in each 
     volume compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this 
     section.
       (d) Congressional Copies.--Not later than April 1, 2008, 
     the Secretary shall transmit at least 25 copies of each 
     volume compiled, and of each volume reprinted, pursuant to 
     this section to each of the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate.
       (e) Availability.--The Secretary shall ensure that each 
     volume compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this 
     section are available through electronic means, including on 
     the Internet.

     SEC. 2005. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.

       Section 217 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2326a) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d);
       (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
       ``(c) Dredged Material Facility.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may enter into a 
     partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with one or more non-Federal 
     interests with respect to a water resources project, or group 
     of water resources projects within a geographic region, if 
     appropriate, for the acquisition, design, construction, 
     management, or operation of a dredged material processing, 
     treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal facility 
     (including any facility used to demonstrate potential 
     beneficial uses of dredged material, which may include 
     effective sediment contaminant reduction technologies) using 
     funds provided in whole or in part by the Federal Government.
       ``(2) Performance.--One or more of the parties to a 
     partnership agreement under this subsection may perform the 
     acquisition, design, construction, management, or operation 
     of a dredged material processing, treatment, contaminant 
     reduction, or disposal facility.
       ``(3) Multiple projects.--If appropriate, the Secretary may 
     combine portions of separate water resources projects with 
     appropriate combined cost-sharing among the various water 
     resources projects in a partnership agreement for a facility 
     under this subsection if the facility serves to manage 
     dredged material from multiple water resources projects 
     located in the geographic region of the facility.
       ``(4) Specified federal funding sources and cost sharing.--
       ``(A) Specified federal funding.--A partnership agreement 
     with respect to a facility under this subsection shall 
     specify--
       ``(i) the Federal funding sources and combined cost-sharing 
     when applicable to multiple water resources projects; and
       ``(ii) the responsibilities and risks of each of the 
     parties relating to present and future dredged material 
     managed by the facility.
       ``(B) Management of sediments.--
       ``(i) In general.--A partnership agreement under this 
     subsection may include the management of sediments from the 
     maintenance dredging of Federal water resources projects that 
     do not have partnership agreements.
       ``(ii) Payments.--A partnership agreement under this 
     subsection may allow the non-Federal interest to receive 
     reimbursable payments from the Federal Government for 
     commitments made by the non-Federal interest for disposal or 
     placement capacity at dredged material processing, treatment, 
     contaminant reduction, or disposal facilities.
       ``(C) Credit.--A partnership agreement under this 
     subsection may allow costs incurred by the non-Federal 
     interest before execution of the partnership agreement to be 
     credited in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
       ``(5) Credit.--
       ``(A) Effect on existing agreements.--Nothing in this 
     subsection supersedes or modifies an agreement in effect on 
     the date of enactment of this paragraph between the Federal 
     Government and any non-Federal interest for the cost-sharing, 
     construction, and operation and maintenance of a water 
     resources project.
       ``(B) Credit for funds.--Subject to the approval of the 
     Secretary and in accordance with law (including regulations 
     and policies) in effect on the date of enactment of this 
     paragraph, a non-Federal interest for a water resources 
     project may receive credit for funds provided for the 
     acquisition, design, construction, management, or operation 
     of a dredged material processing, treatment, contaminant 
     reduction, or disposal facility to the extent the facility is 
     used to manage dredged material from the project.
       ``(C) Non-federal interest responsibilities.--A non-Federal 
     interest entering into a partnership agreement under this 
     subsection for a facility shall--
       ``(i) be responsible for providing all necessary lands, 
     easements, relocations, and rights-of-way associated with the 
     facility; and
       ``(ii) receive credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project with respect to which the agreement is 
     being entered into for those items.''; and
       (3) in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of subsection (d) (as 
     redesignated by paragraph (1))--
       (A) by inserting ``and maintenance'' after ``operation'' 
     each place it appears; and
       (B) by inserting ``processing, treatment, contaminant 
     reduction, or'' after ``dredged material'' the first place it 
     appears in each of those paragraphs.

     SEC. 2006. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS.

       (a) In General.--In conducting a study of harbor and 
     navigation improvements, the Secretary may recommend a 
     project without the need to demonstrate that the project is 
     justified solely by national economic development benefits if 
     the Secretary determines that--
       (1)(A) the community to be served by the project is at 
     least 70 miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial 
     port and has no direct rail or highway link to another 
     community served by a surface accessible port or harbor; or
       (B) the project would be located in the State of Hawaii, 
     the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of 
     the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin 
     Islands, or American Samoa;
       (2) the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 
     percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be 
     consumed within the community served by the harbor and 
     navigation improvement; and
       (3) the long-term viability of the community would be 
     threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.
       (b) Justification.--In considering whether to recommend a 
     project under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider 
     the benefits of the project to--
       (1) public health and safety of the local community, 
     including access to facilities designed to protect public 
     health and safety;
       (2) access to natural resources for subsistence purposes;
       (3) local and regional economic opportunities;
       (4) welfare of the local population; and
       (5) social and cultural value to the community.

     SEC. 2007. USE OF OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS.

       The non-Federal interest for a water resources study or 
     project may use, and the Secretary shall accept, funds 
     provided by a Federal agency under any other Federal program, 
     to satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the study or project if the Federal agency that 
     provides the funds determines that the funds are authorized 
     to be used to carry out the study or project.

     SEC. 2008. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT; COST 
                   SHARING.

       (a) Federal Allocation.--Upon authorization by law of an 
     increase in the maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
     allocated for a water resources project or an increase in the 
     total cost of a water resources project authorized to be 
     carried out by the Secretary, the Secretary shall enter into 
     a revised partnership agreement for the project to take into 
     account the change in Federal participation in the project.
       (b)  Cost Sharing.--An increase in the maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be allocated for a water resources 
     project, or an increase in the total cost of a water 
     resources project, authorized to be carried out by the 
     Secretary shall not affect any cost-sharing requirement 
     applicable to the project.
       (c) Cost Estimates.--The estimated Federal and non-Federal 
     costs of water resources projects authorized to be carried 
     out by the Secretary before, on, or after the date of 
     enactment of this Act are for informational purposes only and 
     shall not be interpreted as affecting the cost-sharing 
     responsibilities established by law.

     SEC. 2009. EXPEDITED ACTIONS FOR EMERGENCY FLOOD DAMAGE 
                   REDUCTION.

       The Secretary shall expedite any authorized planning, 
     design, and construction of any project for flood damage 
     reduction for an area that, within the preceding 5 years, has 
     been subject to flooding that resulted in the loss of life 
     and caused damage of sufficient severity and magnitude to 
     warrant a declaration of a major disaster by the President 
     under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
     Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

     SEC. 2010. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

       Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 2267a; 114 Stat. 2587-2588; 100 Stat. 4164) is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (d)--
       (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (4);
       (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (5) and 
     inserting a semicolon; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(6) Tuscarawas River Basin, Ohio;
       ``(7) Sauk River Basin, Snohomish and Skagit Counties, 
     Washington;
       ``(8) Niagara River Basin, New York;
       ``(9) Genesee River Basin, New York; and
       ``(10) White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.'';
       (2) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (f) and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the 
     costs of an assessment carried out under this section on or 
     after December 11, 2000, shall be 25 percent.''; and
       (3) by striking subsection (g).

     SEC. 2011. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

       (a) Program.--Section 203(b) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269(b); 114 Stat. 2589) 
     is amended--

[[Page 21764]]

       (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ``carry out water-related 
     planning activities and'' after ``the Secretary may'';
       (2) in paragraph (1)(B) by inserting after ``Code'' the 
     following: ``, and including lands that are within the 
     jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian tribe, as 
     determined by the Secretary of the Interior, and are 
     recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as eligible for 
     trust land status under part 151 of title 25, Code of Federal 
     Regulations''; and
       (3) in paragraph (2)--
       (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A);
       (B) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); 
     and
       (C) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
       ``(B) watershed assessments and planning activities; and''.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 203(e) of 
     such Act is amended by striking ``2006'' and inserting 
     ``2012''.

     SEC. 2012. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING.

       Section 309 of Public Law 102-154 (42 U.S.C. 1856a-1; 105 
     Stat. 1034) is amended by inserting ``the Secretary of the 
     Army,'' after ``the Secretary of Energy,''.

     SEC. 2013. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

       Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``The Secretary'' and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(a) Federal State Cooperation.--
       ``(1) Comprehensive plans.--The Secretary'';
       (2) by inserting after the last sentence in subsection (a) 
     the following:
       ``(2) Technical assistance.--
       ``(A) In general.--At the request of a governmental agency 
     or non-Federal interest, the Secretary may provide, at 
     Federal expense, technical assistance to such agency or non-
     Federal interest in managing water resources.
       ``(B) Types of assistance.--Technical assistance under this 
     paragraph may include provision and integration of 
     hydrologic, economic, and environmental data and analyses.'';
       (3) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``this section'' each 
     place it appears and inserting ``subsection (a)(1)'';
       (4) in subsection (b)(2) by striking ``Up to \1/2\ of the'' 
     and inserting ``The'';
       (5) in subsection (c) by striking ``(c) There is'' and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
       ``(1) Federal and state cooperation.--There is'';
       (6) in subsection (c)(1) (as designated by paragraph (5))--
       (A) by striking ``the provisions of this section'' and 
     inserting ``subsection (a)(1),''; and
       (B) by striking ``$500,000'' and inserting ``$2,000,000'';
       (7) by inserting at the end of subsection (c) the 
     following:
       ``(2) Technical assistance.--There is authorized to be 
     appropriated $5,000,000 annually to carry out subsection 
     (a)(2), of which not more than $2,000,000 annually may be 
     used by the Secretary to enter into cooperative agreements 
     with nonprofit organizations to provide assistance to rural 
     and small communities.'';
       (8) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
       (9) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
       ``(d) Annual Submission of Proposed Activities.--Concurrent 
     with the President's submission to Congress of the 
     President's request for appropriations for the Civil Works 
     Program for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
     of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works of the Senate a report describing the individual 
     activities proposed for funding under subsection (a)(1) for 
     that fiscal year.''.

     SEC. 2014. LAKES PROGRAM.

       Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (100 Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``and'' at end of paragraph (18);
       (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (19) and 
     inserting a semicolon; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(20) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois, removal of 
     silt and aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
     sedimentation;
       ``(21) McCarter Pond, Borough of Fairhaven, New Jersey, 
     removal of silt and measures to address water quality;
       ``(22) Rogers Pond, Franklin Township, New Jersey, removal 
     of silt and restoration of structural integrity;
       ``(23) Greenwood Lake, New York and New Jersey, removal of 
     silt and aquatic growth;
       ``(24) Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina, removal of 
     silt and excessive nutrients and restoration of structural 
     integrity;
       ``(25) Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota, removal of silt and 
     aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
     sedimentation;
       ``(26) Lake Luxembourg, Pennsylvania;
       ``(27) Lake Fairlee, Vermont, removal of silt and aquatic 
     growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation; and
       ``(28) Lake Morley, Vermont, removal of silt and aquatic 
     growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation.''.

     SEC. 2015. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.

       (a) In General.--For the purpose of expediting the cost-
     effective design and construction of wetlands restoration 
     that is part of an authorized water resources project, the 
     Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements under section 
     6305 of title 31, United States Code, with nonprofit 
     organizations with expertise in wetlands restoration to carry 
     out such design and construction on behalf of the Secretary.
       (b) Limitations.--
       (1) Per project limit.--A cooperative agreement under this 
     section may not obligate the Secretary to pay the nonprofit 
     organization more than $1,000,000 for any single wetlands 
     restoration project.
       (2) Annual limit.--The total value of work carried out 
     under cooperative agreements under this section may not 
     exceed $5,000,000 in any fiscal year.

     SEC. 2016. TRAINING FUNDS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may include individuals not 
     employed by the Department of the Army in training classes 
     and courses offered by the Corps of Engineers in any case in 
     which the Secretary determines that it is in the best 
     interest of the Federal Government to include those 
     individuals as participants.
       (b) Expenses.--
       (1) In general.--An individual not employed by the 
     Department of the Army attending a training class or course 
     described in subsection (a) shall pay the full cost of the 
     training provided to the individual.
       (2) Payments.--Payments made by an individual for training 
     received under paragraph (1), up to the actual cost of the 
     training--
       (A) may be retained by the Secretary;
       (B) shall be credited to an appropriations account used for 
     paying training costs; and
       (C) shall be available for use by the Secretary, without 
     further appropriation, for training purposes.
       (3) Excess amounts.--Any payments received under paragraph 
     (2) that are in excess of the actual cost of training 
     provided shall be credited as miscellaneous receipts to the 
     Treasury of the United States.

     SEC. 2017. ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCE DATA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a program to 
     provide public access to water resources and related water 
     quality data in the custody of the Corps of Engineers.
       (b) Data.--Public access under subsection (a) shall--
       (1) include, at a minimum, access to data generated in 
     water resources project development and regulation under 
     section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
     U.S.C. 1344); and
       (2) appropriately employ geographic information system 
     technology and linkages to water resource models and 
     analytical techniques.
       (c) Partnerships.--To the maximum extent practicable, in 
     carrying out activities under this section, the Secretary 
     shall develop partnerships, including cooperative agreements, 
     with State, tribal, and local governments and other Federal 
     agencies.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000 for 
     each fiscal year.

     SEC. 2018. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

       (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act of July 3, 1930 
     (33 U.S.C. 426), and notwithstanding administrative actions, 
     it is the policy of the United States to promote beach 
     nourishment for the purposes of flood damage reduction and 
     hurricane and storm damage reduction and related research 
     that encourage the protection, restoration, and enhancement 
     of sandy beaches, including beach restoration and periodic 
     beach renourishment for a period of 50 years, on a 
     comprehensive and coordinated basis by the Federal 
     Government, States, localities, and private enterprises.
       (b) Preference.--In carrying out the policy under 
     subsection (a), preference shall be given to--
       (1) areas in which there has been a Federal investment of 
     funds for the purposes described in subsection (a); and
       (2) areas with respect to which the need for prevention or 
     mitigation of damage to shores and beaches is attributable to 
     Federal navigation projects or other Federal activities.
       (c) Applicability.--The Secretary shall apply the policy 
     under subsection (a) to each shore protection and beach 
     renourishment project (including shore protection and beach 
     renourishment projects constructed before the date of 
     enactment of this Act).

     SEC. 2019. ABILITY TO PAY.

       (a) Criteria and Procedures.--Section 103(m)(2) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
     2213(m)(2)) is amended by striking ``180 days after such date 
     of enactment'' and inserting ``December 31, 2007''.
       (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall apply the criteria and 
     procedures referred to in section 103(m) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) to the 
     following projects:
       (1) St. johns bayou and new madrid floodway, missouri.--The 
     project for flood control, St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid 
     Floodway, Missouri, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118).
       (2) Lower rio grande basin, texas.--The project for flood 
     control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, authorized by section 
     401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
     Stat. 4125).
       (3) West virginia and pennsylvania projects.--The projects 
     for flood control authorized by section 581 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790-3791).

     SEC. 2020. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY RESTORATION.

       Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2330; 110 Stat. 3679) is amended--

[[Page 21765]]

       (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
       ``(a) General Authority.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a project to 
     restore and protect an aquatic ecosystem or estuary if the 
     Secretary determines that the project--
       ``(A)(i) will improve the quality of the environment and is 
     in the public interest; or
       ``(ii) will improve the elements and features of an estuary 
     (as defined in section 103 of the Estuaries and Clean Waters 
     Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2902)); and
       ``(B) is cost-effective.
       ``(2) Dam removal.--A project under this section may 
     include removal of a dam.''; and
       (2) in subsection (e) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$50,000,000''.

     SEC. 2021. SMALL FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

       Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
     701s) is amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$55,000,000''.

     SEC. 2022. SMALL RIVER AND HARBOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.

       Section 107(b) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
     U.S.C. 577(b)) is amended by striking ``$4,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$7,000,000''.

     SEC. 2023. PROTECTION OF HIGHWAYS, BRIDGE APPROACHES, PUBLIC 
                   WORKS, AND NONPROFIT PUBLIC SERVICES.

       Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
     701r) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$1,500,000''.

     SEC. 2024. MODIFICATION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE 
                   QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

       Section 1135(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(h)) is amended by striking 
     ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$40,000,000''.

     SEC. 2025. REMEDIATION OF ABANDONED MINE SITES.

       Section 560(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (33 U.S.C. 2336(f)) is amended by striking 
     ``$7,500,000'' and inserting ``$20,000,000''.

     SEC. 2026. LEASING AUTHORITY.

       Section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
     construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors 
     for flood control, and other purposes'', approved December 
     22, 1944 (16 U.S.C. 460d), is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian tribes and'' 
     before ``Federal'' the first place it appears;
       (2) by inserting ``Indian tribes or'' after 
     ``considerations, to such''; and
       (3) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian tribe'' 
     after ``That in any such lease or license to a''.

     SEC. 2027. FISCAL TRANSPARENCY REPORT.

       (a) In General.--On the third Tuesday of January of each 
     year beginning January 2008, the Chief of Engineers shall 
     submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
     the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on--
       (1) the expenditures by the Corps for the preceding fiscal 
     year and estimated expenditures by the Corps for the current 
     fiscal year; and
       (2) for projects and activities that are not scheduled for 
     completion in the current fiscal year, the estimated 
     expenditures by the Corps necessary in the following fiscal 
     year for each project or activity to maintain the same level 
     of effort being achieved in the current fiscal year.
       (b) Contents.--In addition to the information described in 
     subsection (a), the report shall contain a detailed 
     accounting of the following information:
       (1) With respect to activities carried out with funding 
     provided under the Construction appropriations account for 
     the Secretary, information on--
       (A) projects currently under construction, including--
       (i) allocations to date;
       (ii) the number of years remaining to complete 
     construction;
       (iii) the estimated annual Federal cost to maintain that 
     construction schedule; and
       (iv) a list of projects the Corps of Engineers expects to 
     complete during the current fiscal year; and
       (B) projects for which there is a signed partnership 
     agreement and completed planning, engineering, and design, 
     including--
       (i) the number of years the project is expected to require 
     for completion; and
       (ii) estimated annual Federal cost to maintain that 
     construction schedule.
       (2) With respect to operation and maintenance of the inland 
     and intracoastal waterways identified by section 206 of the 
     Inland Waterways Revenue Act of 1978 (33 U.S.C. 1804)--
       (A) the estimated annual cost to maintain each waterway for 
     the authorized reach and at the authorized depth;
       (B) the estimated annual cost of operation and maintenance 
     of locks and dams to ensure navigation without interruption; 
     and
       (C) the actual expenditures to maintain each waterway.
       (3) With respect to activities carried out with funding 
     provided under the Investigations appropriations account for 
     the Secretary--
       (A) the number of active studies;
       (B) the number of completed studies not yet authorized for 
     construction;
       (C) the number of initiated studies; and
       (D) the number of studies expected to be completed during 
     the fiscal year.
       (4) Funding received and estimates of funds to be received 
     for interagency and international support activities under 
     section 234 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2323a).
       (5) Recreation fees and lease payments.
       (6) Hydropower and water storage receipts.
       (7) Deposits into the Inland Waterways Trust Fund and the 
     Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
       (8) Other revenues and fees collected by the Corps of 
     Engineers.
       (9) With respect to permit applications and notifications, 
     a list of individual permit applications and nationwide 
     permit notifications, including--
       (A) the date on which each permit application is filed;
       (B) the date on which each permit application is determined 
     to be complete;
       (C) the date on which any permit application is withdrawn; 
     and
       (D) the date on which the Corps of Engineers grants or 
     denies each permit.
       (10) With respect to projects that are authorized but for 
     which construction is not complete, a list of such projects 
     for which no funds have been allocated for the 5 preceding 
     fiscal years, including, for each project--
       (A) the authorization date;
       (B) the last allocation date;
       (C) the percentage of construction completed;
       (D) the estimated cost remaining until completion of the 
     project; and
       (E) a brief explanation of the reasons for the delay.

     SEC. 2028. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 2361 of title 10, 
     United States Code, the Secretary may provide assistance 
     through contracts, cooperative agreements, and grants to--
       (1) the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, for 
     establishment and operation of the Southeastern Water 
     Resources Institute to study sustainable development and 
     utilization of water resources in the southeastern United 
     States;
       (2) Lewis and Clark Community College, Illinois, for the 
     Great Rivers National Research and Education Center 
     (including facilities that have been or will be constructed 
     at one or more locations in the vicinity of the confluence of 
     the Illinois River, the Missouri River, and the Mississippi 
     River), a collaborative effort of Lewis and Clark Community 
     College, the University of Illinois, the Illinois Department 
     of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, and other 
     entities, for the study of river ecology, developing 
     watershed and river management strategies, and educating 
     students and the public on river issues; and
       (3) the University of Texas at Dallas for support and 
     operation of the International Center for Decision and Risk 
     Analysis to study risk analysis and control methods for 
     transboundary water resources management in the southwestern 
     United States and other international water resources 
     management problems.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
     to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out subsection 
     (a)(1) $2,000,000, to carry out subsection (a)(2) $2,000,000, 
     and to carry out subsection (a)(3) $5,000,000.

     SEC. 2029. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON CRITERIA FOR OPERATION AND 
                   MAINTENANCE OF HARBOR DREDGING PROJECTS.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
       (1) Insufficient maintenance dredging results in 
     inefficient water transportation and harmful economic 
     consequences.
       (2) The estimated dredging backlog at commercial harbors in 
     the Great Lakes alone is 16,000,000 cubic yards.
       (3) Approximately two-thirds of all shipping in the United 
     States either starts or finishes at small harbors.
       (4) Small harbors often have a greater proportional impact 
     on local economies than do larger harbors.
       (5) Performance metrics can be valuable tools in the budget 
     process for water resources projects.
       (6) The use of a single performance metric for water 
     resources projects can result in a budget biased against 
     small and rural communities.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     the operations and maintenance budget of the Corps of 
     Engineers should reflect the use of all available economic 
     data, rather than a single performance metric.

     SEC. 2030. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.

       Section 234 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2323a) is amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
       ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities 
     (including contracting) in support of other Federal agencies, 
     international organizations, or foreign governments to 
     address problems of national significance to the United 
     States.'';
       (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``Secretary of State'' 
     and inserting ``Department of State''; and
       (3) in subsection (d)--
       (A) by striking ``$250,000 for fiscal year 2001'' and 
     inserting ``$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2008''; and
       (B) by striking ``or international organizations'' and 
     inserting ``, international organizations, or foreign 
     governments''.

     SEC. 2031. WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES.

       (a) National Water Resources Planning Policy.--It is the 
     policy of the United States that all water resources projects 
     should reflect

[[Page 21766]]

     national priorities, encourage economic development, and 
     protect the environment by--
       (1) seeking to maximize sustainable economic development;
       (2) seeking to avoid the unwise use of floodplains and 
     flood-prone areas and minimizing adverse impacts and 
     vulnerabilities in any case in which a floodplain or flood-
     prone area must be used; and
       (3) protecting and restoring the functions of natural 
     systems and mitigating any unavoidable damage to natural 
     systems.
       (b) Principles and Guidelines.--
       (1) Principles and guidelines defined.--In this subsection, 
     the term ``principles and guidelines'' means the principles 
     and guidelines contained in the document prepared by the 
     Water Resources Council pursuant to section 103 of the Water 
     Resources Planning Act (42 U.S.C. 1962a-2), entitled 
     ``Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for 
     Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies'', 
     and dated March 10, 1983.
       (2) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue revisions, 
     consistent with paragraph (3), to the principles and 
     guidelines for use by the Secretary in the formulation, 
     evaluation, and implementation of water resources projects.
       (3) Considerations.--In developing revisions to the 
     principles and guidelines under paragraph (2), the Secretary 
     shall evaluate the consistency of the principles and 
     guidelines with, and ensure that the principles and 
     guidelines address, the following:
       (A) The use of best available economic principles and 
     analytical techniques, including techniques in risk and 
     uncertainty analysis.
       (B) The assessment and incorporation of public safety in 
     the formulation of alternatives and recommended plans.
       (C) Assessment methods that reflect the value of projects 
     for low-income communities and projects that use 
     nonstructural approaches to water resources development and 
     management.
       (D) The assessment and evaluation of the interaction of a 
     project with other water resources projects and programs 
     within a region or watershed.
       (E) The use of contemporary water resources paradigms, 
     including integrated water resources management and adaptive 
     management.
       (F) Evaluation methods that ensure that water resources 
     projects are justified by public benefits.
       (4) Consultation and public participation.--In carrying out 
     paragraph (2), the Secretary shall--
       (A) consult with the Secretary of the Interior, the 
     Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the 
     Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of 
     Transportation, the Administrator of the Environmental 
     Protection Agency, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of 
     Homeland Security, the National Academy of Sciences, and the 
     Council on Environmental Quality; and
       (B) solicit and consider public and expert comments.
       (5) Publication.--The Secretary shall--
       (A) submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
     of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives copies of--
       (i) the revisions to the principles and guidelines for use 
     by the Secretary; and
       (ii) an explanation of the intent of each revision, how 
     each revision is consistent with this section, and the 
     probable impact of each revision on water resources projects 
     carried out by the Secretary; and
       (B) make the revisions to the principles and guidelines for 
     use by the Secretary available to the public, including on 
     the Internet.
       (6) Effect.--Subject to the requirements of this 
     subsection, the principles and guidelines as revised under 
     this subsection shall apply to water resources projects 
     carried out by the Secretary instead of the principles and 
     guidelines for such projects in effect on the day before date 
     of enactment of this Act.
       (7) Applicability.--After the date of issuance of the 
     revisions to the principles and guidelines, the revisions 
     shall apply--
       (A) to all water resources projects carried out by the 
     Secretary, other than projects for which the Secretary has 
     commenced a feasibility study before the date of such 
     issuance;
       (B) at the request of a non-Federal interest, to a water 
     resources project for which the Secretary has commenced a 
     feasibility study before the date of such issuance; and
       (C) to the reevaluation or modification of a water 
     resources project, other than a reevaluation or modification 
     that has been commenced by the Secretary before the date of 
     such issuance.
       (8) Existing studies.--Revisions to the principles and 
     guidelines issued under paragraph (2) shall not affect the 
     validity of any completed study of a water resources project.
       (9) Recommendation.--Upon completion of the revisions to 
     the principles and guidelines for use by the Secretary, the 
     Secretary shall make a recommendation to Congress as to the 
     advisability of repealing subsections (a) and (b) of section 
     80 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-17).

     SEC. 2032. WATER RESOURCE PRIORITIES REPORT.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress 
     a report describing the vulnerability of the United States to 
     damage from flooding, including--
       (1) the risk to human life;
       (2) the risk to property; and
       (3) the comparative risks faced by different regions of the 
     United States.
       (b) Inclusions.--The report under subsection (a) shall 
     include--
       (1) an assessment of the extent to which programs in the 
     United States relating to flooding address flood risk 
     reduction priorities;
       (2) the extent to which those programs may be encouraging 
     development and economic activity in flood-prone areas;
       (3) recommendations for improving those programs with 
     respect to reducing and responding to flood risks; and
       (4) proposals for implementing the recommendations.

     SEC. 2033. PLANNING.

       (a) Matters to Be Addressed in Planning.--Section 904 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281) 
     is amended--
       (1) by striking ``Enhancing'' and inserting the following:
       ``(a) In General.--Enhancing''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(b) Assessments.--For all feasibility reports for water 
     resources projects completed after December 31, 2007, the 
     Secretary shall assess whether--
       ``(1) the water resources project and each separable 
     element is cost-effective; and
       ``(2) the water resources project complies with Federal, 
     State, and local laws (including regulations) and public 
     policies.''.
       (b) Planning Process Improvements.--The Chief of 
     Engineers--
       (1) shall adopt a risk analysis approach to project cost 
     estimates for water resources projects; and
       (2) not later than one year after the date of enactment of 
     this Act, shall--
       (A) issue procedures for risk analysis for cost estimation 
     for water resources projects; and
       (B) submit to Congress a report that includes any 
     recommended amendments to section 902 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280).
       (c) Benchmarks.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 12 months after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Chief of Engineers shall establish 
     benchmarks for determining the length of time it should take 
     to conduct a feasibility study for a water resources project 
     and its associated review process under the National 
     Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 
     The Chief of Engineers shall use such benchmarks as a 
     management tool to make the feasibility study process more 
     efficient in all districts of the Corps of Engineers.
       (2) Benchmark goals.--The Chief of Engineers shall 
     establish, to the extent practicable, under paragraph (1) 
     benchmark goals for completion of feasibility studies for 
     water resources projects generally within 2 years. In the 
     case of feasibility studies that the Chief of Engineers 
     determines may require additional time based on the project 
     type, size, cost, or complexity, the benchmark goal for 
     completion shall be generally within 4 years.
        (d) Calculation of Benefits and Costs for Flood Damage 
     Reduction Projects.--A feasibility study for a project for 
     flood damage reduction shall include, as part of the 
     calculation of benefits and costs--
       (1) a calculation of the residual risk of flooding 
     following completion of the proposed project;
       (2) a calculation of the residual risk of loss of human 
     life and residual risk to human safety following completion 
     of the proposed project;
       (3) a calculation of any upstream or downstream impacts of 
     the proposed project; and
       (4) calculations to ensure that the benefits and costs 
     associated with structural and nonstructural alternatives are 
     evaluated in an equitable manner.
       (e) Centers of Specialized Planning Expertise.--
       (1) Establishment.--The Secretary may establish centers of 
     expertise to provide specialized planning expertise for water 
     resources projects to be carried out by the Secretary in 
     order to enhance and supplement the capabilities of the 
     districts of the Corps of Engineers.
       (2) Duties.--A center of expertise established under this 
     subsection shall--
       (A) provide technical and managerial assistance to district 
     commanders of the Corps of Engineers for project planning, 
     development, and implementation;
       (B) provide agency peer reviews of new major scientific, 
     engineering, or economic methods, models, or analyses that 
     will be used to support decisions of the Secretary with 
     respect to feasibility studies for water resources projects;
       (C) provide support for independent peer review panels 
     under section 2034; and
       (D) carry out such other duties as are prescribed by the 
     Secretary.
       (f) Completion of Corps of Engineers Reports.--
       (1) Alternatives.--
       (A) In general.--Feasibility and other studies and 
     assessments for a water resources project shall include 
     recommendations for alternatives--
       (i) that, as determined in coordination with the non-
     Federal interest for the project, promote integrated water 
     resources management; and
       (ii) for which the non-Federal interest is willing to 
     provide the non-Federal share for the studies or assessments.
       (B) Constraints.--The alternatives contained in studies and 
     assessments described in subparagraph (A) shall not be 
     constrained by budgetary or other policy.
       (C) Reports of chief of engineers.--The reports of the 
     Chief of Engineers shall identify

[[Page 21767]]

     any recommendation that is not the best technical solution to 
     water resource needs and problems and the reason for the 
     deviation.
       (2) Report completion.--The completion of a report of the 
     Chief of Engineers for a water resources project--
       (A) shall not be delayed while consideration is being given 
     to potential changes in policy or priority for project 
     consideration; and
       (B) shall be submitted, on completion, to--
       (i) the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
     Senate; and
       (ii) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
     the House of Representatives.
       (g) Completion Review.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), not 
     later than 120 days after the date of completion of a report 
     of the Chief of Engineers that recommends to Congress a water 
     resources project, the Secretary shall--
       (A) review the report; and
       (B) provide any recommendations of the Secretary regarding 
     the water resources project to Congress.
       (2) Prior reports.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
     of enactment of this Act, with respect to any report of the 
     Chief of Engineers recommending a water resources project 
     that is complete prior to the date of enactment of this Act, 
     the Secretary shall complete review of, and provide 
     recommendations to Congress for, the report in accordance 
     with paragraph (1).

     SEC. 2034. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.

       (a) Project Studies Subject to Independent Peer Review.--
       (1) In general.--Project studies shall be subject to a peer 
     review by an independent panel of experts as determined under 
     this section.
       (2) Scope.--The peer review may include a review of the 
     economic and environmental assumptions and projections, 
     project evaluation data, economic analyses, environmental 
     analyses, engineering analyses, formulation of alternative 
     plans, methods for integrating risk and uncertainty, models 
     used in evaluation of economic or environmental impacts of 
     proposed projects, and any biological opinions of the project 
     study.
       (3) Project studies subject to peer review.--
       (A) Mandatory.--A project study shall be subject to peer 
     review under paragraph (1) if--
       (i) the project has an estimated total cost of more than 
     $45,000,000, including mitigation costs, and is not 
     determined by the Chief of Engineers to be exempt from peer 
     review under paragraph (6);
       (ii) the Governor of an affected State requests a peer 
     review by an independent panel of experts; or
       (iii) the Chief of Engineers determines that the project 
     study is controversial considering the factors set forth in 
     paragraph (4).
       (B) Discretionary.--
       (i) Agency request.--A project study shall be considered by 
     the Chief of Engineers for peer review under this section if 
     the head of a Federal or State agency charged with reviewing 
     the project study determines that the project is likely to 
     have a significant adverse impact on environmental, cultural, 
     or other resources under the jurisdiction of the agency after 
     implementation of proposed mitigation plans and requests a 
     peer review by an independent panel of experts.
       (ii) Deadline for decision.--A decision of the Chief of 
     Engineers under this subparagraph whether to conduct a peer 
     review shall be made within 21 days of the date of receipt of 
     the request by the head of the Federal or State agency under 
     clause (i).
       (iii) Reasons for not conducting peer review.--If the Chief 
     of Engineers decides not to conduct a peer review following a 
     request under clause (i), the Chief shall make publicly 
     available, including on the Internet, the reasons for not 
     conducting the peer review.
       (iv) Appeal to chairman of council on environmental 
     quality.--A decision by the Chief of Engineers not to conduct 
     a peer review following a request under clause (i) shall be 
     subject to appeal by a person referred to in clause (i) to 
     the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality if such 
     appeal is made within the 30-day period following the date of 
     the decision being made available under clause (iii). A 
     decision of the Chairman on an appeal under this clause shall 
     be made within 30 days of the date of the appeal.
       (4) Factors to consider.--In determining whether a project 
     study is controversial under paragraph (3)(A)(iii), the Chief 
     of Engineers shall consider if--
       (A) there is a significant public dispute as to the size, 
     nature, or effects of the project; or
       (B) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
     economic or environmental costs or benefits of the project.
       (5) Project studies excluded from peer review.--The Chief 
     of Engineers may exclude a project study from peer review 
     under paragraph (1)--
       (A) if the project study does not include an environmental 
     impact statement and is a project study subject to peer 
     review under paragraph (3)(A)(i) that the Chief of Engineers 
     determines--
       (i) is not controversial;
       (ii) has no more than negligible adverse impacts on scarce 
     or unique cultural, historic, or tribal resources;
       (iii) has no substantial adverse impacts on fish and 
     wildlife species and their habitat prior to the 
     implementation of mitigation measures; and
       (iv) has, before implementation of mitigation measures, no 
     more than a negligible adverse impact on a species listed as 
     endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species 
     Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) or the critical habitat 
     of such species designated under such Act;
       (B) if the project study--
       (i) involves only the rehabilitation or replacement of 
     existing hydropower turbines, lock structures, or flood 
     control gates within the same footprint and for the same 
     purpose as an existing water resources project;
       (ii) is for an activity for which there is ample experience 
     within the Corps of Engineers and industry to treat the 
     activity as being routine; and
       (iii) has minimal life safety risk; or
       (C) if the project study does not include an environmental 
     impact statement and is a project study pursued under section 
     205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), 
     section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 (33 
     U.S.C. 701g), section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 
     U.S.C. 701r), section 107(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(a)), section 3 of the Act entitled ``An 
     Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of 
     protecting the shores of publicly owned property'', approved 
     August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), section 111 of the River 
     and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i), section 3 of the Act 
     entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
     preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
     and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 
     603a), section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), or section 206 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
       (6) Determination of total cost.--For purposes of 
     determining the estimated total cost of a project under 
     paragraph (3)(A), the total cost shall be based upon the 
     reasonable estimates of the Chief of Engineers at the 
     completion of the reconnaissance study for the project. If 
     the reasonable estimate of total costs is subsequently 
     determined to be in excess of the amount in paragraph (3)(A), 
     the Chief of Engineers shall make a determination whether a 
     project study is required to be reviewed under this section.
       (b) Timing of Peer Review.--
       (1) In general.--The Chief of Engineers shall determine the 
     timing of a peer review of a project study under subsection 
     (a). In all cases, the peer review shall occur during the 
     period beginning on the date of the signing of the 
     feasibility cost-sharing agreement for the study and ending 
     on the date established under subsection (e)(1)(A) for the 
     peer review and shall be accomplished concurrent with the 
     conducting of the project study.
       (2) Factors to consider.--In any case in which the Chief of 
     Engineers has not initiated a peer review of a project study, 
     the Chief of Engineers shall consider, at a minimum, whether 
     to initiate a peer review at the time that--
       (A) the without-project conditions are identified;
       (B) the array of alternatives to be considered are 
     identified; and
       (C) the preferred alternative is identified.
       (3) Limitation on multiple peer review.--Nothing in this 
     subsection shall be construed to require the Chief of 
     Engineers to conduct multiple peer reviews for a project 
     study.
       (c) Establishment of Panels.--
       (1) In general.--For each project study subject to peer 
     review under subsection (a), as soon as practicable after the 
     Chief of Engineers determines that a project study will be 
     subject to peer review, the Chief of Engineers shall contract 
     with the National Academy of Sciences or a similar 
     independent scientific and technical advisory organization or 
     an eligible organization to establish a panel of experts to 
     conduct a peer review for the project study.
       (2) Membership.--A panel of experts established for a 
     project study under this section shall be composed of 
     independent experts who represent a balance of areas of 
     expertise suitable for the review being conducted.
       (3) Limitation on appointments.--The National Academy of 
     Sciences or any other organization the Chief of Engineers 
     contracts with under paragraph (1) to establish a panel of 
     experts shall apply the National Academy of Science's policy 
     for selecting committee members to ensure that members 
     selected for the panel of experts have no conflict with the 
     project being reviewed.
       (4) Congressional notification.--Upon identification of a 
     project study for peer review under this section, but prior 
     to initiation of the review, the Chief of Engineers shall 
     notify the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
     Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
     of the House of Representatives of the review.
       (d) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for a 
     peer review for a project study under this section shall--
       (1) conduct the peer review for the project study;
       (2) assess the adequacy and acceptability of the economic, 
     engineering, and environmental methods, models, and analyses 
     used by the Chief of Engineers;
       (3) receive from the Chief of Engineers the public written 
     and oral comments provided to the Chief of Engineers;
       (4) provide timely written and oral comments to the Chief 
     of Engineers throughout the development of the project study, 
     as requested; and
       (5) submit to the Chief of Engineers a final report 
     containing the panel's economic, engineering, and 
     environmental analysis of the project study, including the 
     panel's assessment of the

[[Page 21768]]

     adequacy and acceptability of the economic, engineering, and 
     environmental methods, models, and analyses used by the Chief 
     of Engineers, to accompany the publication of the report of 
     the Chief of Engineers for the project.
       (e) Duration of Project Study Peer Reviews.--
       (1) Deadline.--A panel of experts established under this 
     section shall--
       (A) complete its peer review under this section for a 
     project study and submit a report to the Chief of Engineers 
     under subsection (d)(5) not more than 60 days after the last 
     day of the public comment period for the draft project study, 
     or, if the Chief of Engineers determines that a longer period 
     of time is necessary, such period of time determined 
     necessary by the Chief of Engineers; and
       (B) terminate on the date of initiation of the State and 
     agency review required by the first section of the Flood 
     Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887).
       (2) Failure to meet deadline.--If a panel of experts does 
     not complete its peer review of a project study under this 
     section and submit a report to the Chief of Engineers under 
     subsection (d)(5) on or before the deadline established by 
     paragraph (1) for the peer review, the Chief of Engineers 
     shall complete the project study without delay.
       (f) Recommendations of Panel.--
       (1) Consideration by the chief of engineers.--After 
     receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts 
     under this section and before entering a final record of 
     decision for the project, the Chief of Engineers shall 
     consider any recommendations contained in the report and 
     prepare a written response for any recommendations adopted or 
     not adopted.
       (2) Public availability and transmittal to congress.--After 
     receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts 
     under this section, the Chief of Engineers shall--
       (A) make a copy of the report and any written response of 
     the Chief of Engineers on recommendations contained in the 
     report available to the public by electronic means, including 
     the Internet; and
       (B) transmit to the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a copy of the 
     report, together with any such written response, on the date 
     of a final report of the Chief of Engineers or other final 
     decision document for the project study.
       (g) Costs.--
       (1) In general.--The costs of a panel of experts 
     established for a peer review under this section--
       (A) shall be a Federal expense; and
       (B) shall not exceed $500,000.
       (2) Waiver.--The Chief of Engineers may waive the $500,000 
     limitation contained in paragraph (1)(B) in cases that the 
     Chief of Engineers determines appropriate.
       (h) Applicability.--This section shall apply to--
       (1) project studies initiated during the 2-year period 
     preceding the date of enactment of this Act and for which the 
     array of alternatives to be considered has not been 
     identified; and
       (2) project studies initiated during the period beginning 
     on such date of enactment and ending 7 years after such date 
     of enactment.
       (i) Reports.--
       (1) Initial report.--Not later than 3 years after the date 
     of enactment of this section, the Chief of Engineers shall 
     submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
     the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on 
     the implementation of this section.
       (2) Additional report.--Not later than 6 years after the 
     date of enactment of this section, the Chief of Engineers 
     shall update the report under paragraph (1) taking into 
     account any further information on implementation of this 
     section and submit such updated report to the Committee on 
     Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee 
     on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives.
       (j) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory 
     Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to a peer 
     review panel established under this section.
       (k) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed to affect any authority of the Chief of Engineers 
     to cause or conduct a peer review of a water resources 
     project existing on the date of enactment of this section.
       (l) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       (1) Project study.--The term ``project study'' means--
       (A) a feasibility study or reevaluation study for a water 
     resources project, including the environmental impact 
     statement prepared for the study; and
       (B) any other study associated with a modification of a 
     water resources project that includes an environmental impact 
     statement, including the environmental impact statement 
     prepared for the study.
       (2) Affected state.--The term ``affected State'', as used 
     with respect to a water resources project, means a State all 
     or a portion of which is within the drainage basin in which 
     the project is or would be located and would be economically 
     or environmentally affected as a consequence of the project.
       (3) Eligible organization.--The term ``eligible 
     organization'' means an organization that--
       (A) is described in section 501(c)(3), and exempt from 
     Federal tax under section 501(a), of the Internal Revenue 
     Code of 1986;
       (B) is independent;
       (C) is free from conflicts of interest;
       (D) does not carry out or advocate for or against Federal 
     water resources projects; and
       (E) has experience in establishing and administering peer 
     review panels.
       (4) Total cost.--The term ``total cost'', as used with 
     respect to a water resources project, means the cost of 
     construction (including planning and designing) of the 
     project. In the case of a project for hurricane and storm 
     damage reduction or flood damage reduction that includes 
     periodic nourishment over the life of the project, the term 
     includes the total cost of the nourishment.

     SEC. 2035. SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW.

       (a) Projects Subject to Safety Assurance Review.--The Chief 
     of Engineers shall ensure that the design and construction 
     activities for hurricane and storm damage reduction and flood 
     damage reduction projects are reviewed by independent experts 
     under this section if the Chief of Engineers determines that 
     a review by independent experts is necessary to assure public 
     health, safety, and welfare.
       (b) Factors.--In determining whether a review of design and 
     construction of a project is necessary under this section, 
     the Chief of Engineers shall consider whether--
       (1) the failure of the project would pose a significant 
     threat to human life;
       (2) the project involves the use of innovative materials or 
     techniques;
       (3) the project design lacks redundancy; or
       (4) the project has a unique construction sequencing or a 
     reduced or overlapping design construction schedule.
       (c) Safety Assurance Review.--
       (1) Initiation of review.--At the appropriate point in the 
     development of detailed engineering and design specifications 
     for each water resources project subject to review under this 
     section, the Chief of Engineers shall initiate a safety 
     assurance review by independent experts on the design and 
     construction activities for the project.
       (2) Selection of reviewers.--A safety assurance review 
     under this section shall include participation by experts 
     selected by the Chief of Engineers from among individuals who 
     are distinguished experts in engineering, hydrology, or other 
     appropriate disciplines. The Chief of Engineers shall apply 
     the National Academy of Science's policy for selecting 
     reviewers to ensure that reviewers have no conflict of 
     interest with the project being reviewed.
       (3) Compensation.--An individual serving as an independent 
     reviewer under this section shall be compensated at a rate of 
     pay to be determined by the Secretary and shall be allowed 
     travel expenses.
       (d) Scope of Safety Assurance Reviews.--A safety assurance 
     review under this section shall include a review of the 
     design and construction activities prior to the initiation of 
     physical construction and periodically thereafter until 
     construction activities are completed on a regular schedule 
     sufficient to inform the Chief of Engineers on the adequacy, 
     appropriateness, and acceptability of the design and 
     construction activities for the purpose of assuring public 
     health, safety, and welfare. The Chief of Engineers shall 
     ensure that reviews under this section do not create any 
     unnecessary delays in design and construction activities.
       (e) Safety Assurance Review Record.--The written 
     recommendations of a reviewer or panel of reviewers under 
     this section and the responses of the Chief of Engineers 
     shall be available to the public, including through 
     electronic means on the Internet.
       (f) Applicability.--This section shall apply to any project 
     in design or under construction on the date of enactment of 
     this Act and to any project with respect to which design or 
     construction is initiated during the period beginning on the 
     date of enactment of this Act and ending 7 years after such 
     date of enactment.

     SEC. 2036. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE AND WETLANDS 
                   LOSSES.

       (a) Mitigation for Fish and Wildlife Losses.--Section 
     906(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
     U.S.C. 2283(d)) is amended--
       (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (1) by striking ``to 
     the Congress'' and inserting ``to Congress in any report, and 
     shall not select a project alternative in any report,'';
       (2) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) by inserting 
     ``, and other habitat types are mitigated to not less than 
     in-kind conditions'' after ``mitigated in-kind''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(3) Mitigation requirements.--
       ``(A) In general.--To mitigate losses to flood damage 
     reduction capabilities and fish and wildlife resulting from a 
     water resources project, the Secretary shall ensure that the 
     mitigation plan for each water resources project complies 
     with the mitigation standards and policies established 
     pursuant to the regulatory programs administered by the 
     Secretary.
       ``(B) Inclusions.--A specific mitigation plan for a water 
     resources project under paragraph (1) shall include, at a 
     minimum--
       ``(i) a plan for monitoring the implementation and 
     ecological success of each mitigation measure, including the 
     cost and duration of any monitoring, and, to the extent 
     practicable, a designation of the entities that will be 
     responsible for the monitoring;
       ``(ii) the criteria for ecological success by which the 
     mitigation will be evaluated and determined to be successful 
     based on replacement of lost functions and values of the 
     habitat, including hydrologic and vegetative characteristics;

[[Page 21769]]

       ``(iii) a description of the land and interests in land to 
     be acquired for the mitigation plan and the basis for a 
     determination that the land and interests are available for 
     acquisition;
       ``(iv) a description of--

       ``(I) the types and amount of restoration activities to be 
     conducted;
       ``(II) the physical action to be undertaken to achieve the 
     mitigation objectives within the watershed in which such 
     losses occur and, in any case in which the mitigation will 
     occur outside the watershed, a detailed explanation for 
     undertaking the mitigation outside the watershed; and
       ``(III) the functions and values that will result from the 
     mitigation plan; and

       ``(v) a contingency plan for taking corrective actions in 
     cases in which monitoring demonstrates that mitigation 
     measures are not achieving ecological success in accordance 
     with criteria under clause (ii).
       ``(C) Responsibility for monitoring.--In any case in which 
     it is not practicable to identify in a mitigation plan for a 
     water resources project the entity responsible for monitoring 
     at the time of a final report of the Chief of Engineers or 
     other final decision document for the project, such entity 
     shall be identified in the partnership agreement entered into 
     with the non-Federal interest under section 221 of Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
       ``(4) Determination of success.--
       ``(A) In general.--A mitigation plan under this subsection 
     shall be considered to be successful at the time at which the 
     criteria under paragraph (3)(B)(ii) are achieved under the 
     plan, as determined by monitoring under paragraph (3)(B)(i).
       ``(B) Consultation.--In determining whether a mitigation 
     plan is successful under subparagraph (A), the Secretary 
     shall consult annually with appropriate Federal agencies and 
     each State in which the applicable project is located on at 
     least the following:
       ``(i) The ecological success of the mitigation as of the 
     date on which the report is submitted.
       ``(ii) The likelihood that the mitigation will achieve 
     ecological success, as defined in the mitigation plan.
       ``(iii) The projected timeline for achieving that success.
       ``(iv) Any recommendations for improving the likelihood of 
     success.
       ``(5) Monitoring.--Mitigation monitoring shall continue 
     until it has been demonstrated that the mitigation has met 
     the ecological success criteria.''.
       (b) Status Report.--
       (1) In general.--Concurrent with the President's submission 
     to Congress of the President's request for appropriations for 
     the Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, the Secretary 
     shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
     report on the status of construction of projects that require 
     mitigation under section 906 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283), the status of such 
     mitigation, and the results of the consultation under 
     subsection (d)(4)(B) of such section.
       (2) Projects included.--The status report shall include the 
     status of--
       (A) all projects that are under construction as of the date 
     of the report;
       (B) all projects for which the President requests funding 
     for the next fiscal year; and
       (C) all projects that have undergone or completed 
     construction, but have not completed the mitigation required 
     under section 906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986.
       (3) Availability of information.--The Secretary shall make 
     information contained in the status report available to the 
     public, including on the Internet.
       (c) Wetlands Mitigation.--
       (1) In general.--In carrying out a water resources project 
     that involves wetlands mitigation and that has impacts that 
     occur within the service area of a mitigation bank, the 
     Secretary, where appropriate, shall first consider the use of 
     the mitigation bank if the bank contains sufficient available 
     credits to offset the impact and the bank is approved in 
     accordance with the Federal Guidance for the Establishment, 
     Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks (60 Fed. Reg. 58605) or 
     other applicable Federal law (including regulations).
       (2) Service area.--To the maximum extent practicable, the 
     service area of the mitigation bank under paragraph (1) shall 
     be in the same watershed as the affected habitat.
       (3) Responsibility for monitoring.--
       (A) In general.--Purchase of credits from a mitigation bank 
     for a water resources project relieves the Secretary and the 
     non-Federal interest from responsibility for monitoring or 
     demonstrating mitigation success.
       (B) Applicability.--The relief of responsibility under 
     subparagraph (A) applies only in any case in which the 
     Secretary determines that monitoring of mitigation success is 
     being conducted by the Secretary or by the owner or operator 
     of the mitigation bank.

     SEC. 2037. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.

       (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended to read 
     as follows:

     ``SEC. 204. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.

       ``(a) In General.--
       ``(1) Sediment use.--For sediment obtained through the 
     construction, operation, or maintenance of an authorized 
     Federal water resources project, the Secretary shall develop, 
     at Federal expense, regional sediment management plans and 
     carry out projects at locations identified in plans developed 
     under this section, or identified jointly by the non-Federal 
     interest and the Secretary, for use in the construction, 
     repair, modification, or rehabilitation of projects 
     associated with Federal water resources projects for purposes 
     listed in paragraph (3).
       ``(2) Cooperation.--The Secretary shall develop plans under 
     this subsection in cooperation with the appropriate Federal, 
     State, regional, and local agencies.
       ``(3) Purposes for sediment use in projects.--The purposes 
     of using sediment for the construction, repair, modification, 
     or rehabilitation of Federal water resources projects are--
       ``(A) to reduce storm damage to property;
       ``(B) to protect, restore, and create aquatic and 
     ecologically related habitats, including wetlands; and
       ``(C) to transport and place suitable sediment.
       ``(b) Secretarial Findings.--Subject to subsection (c), 
     projects carried out under subsection (a) may be carried out 
     in any case in which the Secretary finds that--
       ``(1) the environmental, economic, and social benefits of 
     the project, both monetary and nonmonetary, justify the cost 
     of the project; and
       ``(2) the project will not result in environmental 
     degradation.
       ``(c) Determination of Project Costs.--
       ``(1) Costs of construction.--
       ``(A) In general.--Costs associated with construction of a 
     project under this section or identified in a regional 
     sediment management plan shall be limited solely to 
     construction costs that are in excess of the costs necessary 
     to carry out the dredging for construction, operation, or 
     maintenance of an authorized Federal water resources project 
     in the most cost-effective way, consistent with economic, 
     engineering, and environmental criteria.
       ``(B) Cost sharing.--
       ``(i) In general.--Except as provided in clause (ii), the 
     non-Federal share of the construction cost of a project under 
     this section shall be determined as provided in subsections 
     (a) through (d) of section 103 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
       ``(ii) Special rule.--Construction of a project under this 
     section for one or more of the purposes of protection, 
     restoration, or creation of aquatic and ecologically related 
     habitat, the cost of which does not exceed $750,000 and which 
     is located in a disadvantaged community as determined by the 
     Secretary, may be carried out at Federal expense.
       ``(C) Total cost.--The total Federal costs associated with 
     construction of a project under this section may not exceed 
     $5,000,000.
       ``(2) Operation, maintenance, replacement, and 
     rehabilitation costs.--Operation, maintenance, replacement, 
     and rehabilitation costs associated with a project under this 
     section are the responsibility of the non-Federal interest.
       ``(d) Selection of Dredged Material Disposal Method for 
     Environmental Purposes.--
       ``(1) In general.--In developing and carrying out a Federal 
     water resources project involving the disposal of dredged 
     material, the Secretary may select, with the consent of the 
     non-Federal interest, a disposal method that is not the least 
     cost option if the Secretary determines that the incremental 
     costs of the disposal method are reasonable in relation to 
     the environmental benefits, including the benefits to the 
     aquatic environment to be derived from the creation of 
     wetlands and control of shoreline erosion.
       ``(2) Federal share.--The Federal share of such incremental 
     costs shall be determined in accordance with subsection (c).
       ``(e) State and Regional Plans.--The Secretary may--
       ``(1) cooperate with any State in the preparation of a 
     comprehensive State or regional sediment management plan 
     within the boundaries of the State;
       ``(2) encourage State participation in the implementation 
     of the plan; and
       ``(3) submit to Congress reports and recommendations with 
     respect to appropriate Federal participation in carrying out 
     the plan.
       ``(f) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the 
     Secretary shall give priority to a regional sediment 
     management project in the vicinity of each of the following:
       ``(1) Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas.
       ``(2) Fletcher Cove, California.
       ``(3) Egmont Key, Florida.
       ``(4) Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
       ``(5) Delaware River Estuary, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
       ``(6) Fire Island Inlet, Suffolk County, New York.
       ``(7) Smith Point Park Pavilion and the TWA Flight 800 
     Memorial, Brookhaven, New York.
       ``(8) Morehead City, North Carolina.
       ``(9) Toledo Harbor, Lucas County, Ohio.
       ``(10) Galveston Bay, Texas.
       ``(11) Benson Beach, Washington.
       ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000 per 
     fiscal year, of which not more than $5,000,000 per fiscal 
     year may be used for the development of regional sediment 
     management plans authorized by subsection (e) and of which 
     not more than $3,000,000 per fiscal year may be used for 
     construction of projects to which subsection (c)(1)(B)(ii) 
     applies. Such funds shall remain available until expended.''.
       (b) Conforming Repeal.--
       (1) In general.--Section 145 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is repealed.
       (2) Existing projects.--The Secretary may complete any 
     project being carried out under

[[Page 21770]]

     section 145 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 on 
     the day before the date of enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 2038. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT 
                   PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--Section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
     authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting 
     the shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 
     1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), is amended to read as follows:

     ``SEC. 3. STORM AND HURRICANE RESTORATION AND IMPACT 
                   MINIMIZATION PROGRAM.

       ``(a) Construction of Small Shore and Beach Restoration and 
     Protection Projects.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a program 
     for the construction of small shore and beach restoration and 
     protection projects not specifically authorized by Congress 
     that otherwise comply with the first section of this Act if 
     the Secretary determines that such construction is advisable.
       ``(2) Local cooperation.--The local cooperation requirement 
     of the first section of this Act shall apply to a project 
     under this section.
       ``(3) Completeness.--A project under this subsection--
       ``(A) shall be complete; and
       ``(B) shall not commit the United States to any additional 
     improvement to ensure the successful operation of the 
     project; except for participation in periodic beach 
     nourishment in accordance with--
       ``(i) the first section of this Act; and
       ``(ii) the procedure for projects authorized after 
     submission of a survey report.
       ``(b) National Shoreline Erosion Control Development and 
     Demonstration Program.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct under the 
     program authorized by subsection (a) a national shoreline 
     erosion control development and demonstration program 
     (referred to in this section as the `demonstration program').
       ``(2) Requirements.--
       ``(A) In general.--The demonstration program shall include 
     provisions for--
       ``(i) projects consisting of planning, design, 
     construction, and monitoring of prototype engineered and 
     native and naturalized vegetative shoreline erosion control 
     devices and methods;
       ``(ii) monitoring of the applicable prototypes;
       ``(iii) detailed engineering and environmental reports on 
     the results of each project carried out under the 
     demonstraton program; and
       ``(iv) technology transfers, as appropriate, to private 
     property owners, State and local entities, nonprofit 
     educational institutions, and nongovernmental organizations.
       ``(B) Determination of feasibility.--A project under the 
     demonstration program shall not be carried out until the 
     Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
       ``(C) Emphasis.--A project under the demonstration program 
     shall emphasize, to the maximum extent practicable--
       ``(i) the development and demonstration of innovative 
     technologies;
       ``(ii) efficient designs to prevent erosion at a shoreline 
     site, taking into account the lifecycle cost of the design, 
     including cleanup, maintenance, and amortization;
       ``(iii) new and enhanced shore protection project design 
     and project formulation tools the purposes of which are to 
     improve the physical performance, and lower the lifecycle 
     costs, of the projects;
       ``(iv) natural designs, including the use of native and 
     naturalized vegetation or temporary structures that minimize 
     permanent structural alterations to the shoreline;
       ``(v) the avoidance of negative impacts to adjacent 
     shorefront communities;
       ``(vi) in areas with substantial residential or commercial 
     interests located adjacent to the shoreline, designs that do 
     not impair the aesthetic appeal of the interests;
       ``(vii) the potential for long-term protection afforded by 
     the technology; and
       ``(viii) recommendations developed from evaluations of the 
     program established under the Shoreline Erosion Control 
     Demonstration Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962-5 note), 
     including--

       ``(I) adequate consideration of the subgrade;
       ``(II) proper filtration;
       ``(III) durable components;
       ``(IV) adequate connection between units; and
       ``(V) consideration of additional relevant information.

       ``(D) Sites.--
       ``(i) In general.--Each project under the demonstration 
     program may be carried out at--

       ``(I) a privately owned site with substantial public 
     access; or
       ``(II) a publicly owned site on open coast or in tidal 
     waters.

       ``(ii) Selection.--The Secretary shall develop criteria for 
     the selection of sites for projects under the demonstration 
     program, including criteria based on--

       ``(I) a variety of geographic and climatic conditions;
       ``(II) the size of the population that is dependent on the 
     beaches for recreation or the protection of private property 
     or public infrastructure;
       ``(III) the rate of erosion;
       ``(IV) significant natural resources or habitats and 
     environmentally sensitive areas; and
       ``(V) significant threatened historic structures or 
     landmarks.

       ``(3) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
     demonstration program in consultation with--
       ``(A) the Secretary of Agriculture, particularly with 
     respect to native and naturalized vegetative means of 
     preventing and controlling shoreline erosion;
       ``(B) Federal, State, and local agencies;
       ``(C) private organizations;
       ``(D) the Coastal Engineering Research Center established 
     by the first section of Public Law 88-172 (33 U.S.C. 426-1); 
     and
       ``(E) applicable university research facilities.
       ``(4) Completion of demonstration.--After carrying out the 
     initial construction and evaluation of the performance and 
     cost of a project under the demonstration program, the 
     Secretary may--
       ``(A) amend, at the request of a non-Federal interest of 
     the project, the partnership agreement for a federally 
     authorized shore protection project in existence on the date 
     on which initial construction of the project under the 
     demonstration program is complete to incorporate the project 
     constructed under the demonstration program as a feature of 
     the shore protection project, with the future cost sharing of 
     the project constructed under the demonstration program to be 
     determined by the project purposes of the shore protection 
     project; or
       ``(B) transfer all interest in and responsibility for the 
     completed project constructed under the demonstration program 
     to a non-Federal interest or another Federal agency.
       ``(5) Agreements.--The Secretary may enter into a 
     partnership agreement with the non-Federal interest or a 
     cooperative agreement with the head of another Federal agency 
     under the demonstration program--
       ``(A) to share the costs of construction, operation, 
     maintenance, and monitoring of a project under the 
     demonstration program;
       ``(B) to share the costs of removing the project, or 
     element of the project if the Secretary determines that the 
     project or element of the project is detrimental to public or 
     private property, public infrastructure, or public safety; or
       ``(C) to specify ownership of the completed project if the 
     Secretary determines that the completed project will not be 
     part of a Corps of Engineers project.
       ``(6) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, and every 
     3 years thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to 
     the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
     and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives a report describing--
       ``(A) the activities carried out and accomplishments made 
     under the demonstration program since the previous report 
     under this paragraph; and
       ``(B) any recommendations of the Secretary relating to the 
     program.
       ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
       ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary 
     may expend, from any appropriations made available to the 
     Secretary for the purpose of carrying out civil works, not 
     more than $30,000,000 during any fiscal year to pay the 
     Federal share of the costs of construction of small shore and 
     beach restoration and protection projects or small projects 
     under this section.
       ``(2) Limitation.--The total amount expended for a project 
     under this section shall--
       ``(A) be sufficient to pay the cost of Federal 
     participation in the project (including periodic nourishment 
     as provided for under the first section of this Act), as 
     determined by the Secretary; and
       ``(B) be not more than $5,000,000.''.
       (b) Repeal.--Section 5 the Act entitled ``An Act 
     authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting 
     the shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 
     1946 (33 U.S.C. 426h), is repealed.

     SEC. 2039. MONITORING ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

       (a) In General.--In conducting a feasibility study for a 
     project (or a component of a project) for ecosystem 
     restoration, the Secretary shall ensure that the recommended 
     project includes, as an integral part of the project, a plan 
     for monitoring the success of the ecosystem restoration.
       (b) Monitoring Plan.--The monitoring plan shall--
       (1) include a description of the monitoring activities to 
     be carried out, the criteria for ecosystem restoration 
     success, and the estimated cost and duration of the 
     monitoring; and
       (2) specify that the monitoring shall continue until such 
     time as the Secretary determines that the criteria for 
     ecosystem restoration success will be met.
       (c) Cost Share.--For a period of 10 years from completion 
     of construction of a project (or a component of a project) 
     for ecosystem restoration, the Secretary shall consider the 
     cost of carrying out the monitoring as a project cost. If the 
     monitoring plan under subsection (b) requires monitoring 
     beyond the 10-year period, the cost of monitoring shall be a 
     non-Federal responsibility.

     SEC. 2040. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement a 
     program to allow electronic submission of permit applications 
     for permits under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.
       (b) Limitations.--This section does not preclude the 
     submission of a physical copy.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

     SEC. 2041. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.

       (a) Project Tracking.--The Secretary shall assign a unique 
     tracking number to each water resources project under the 
     jurisdiction of the Secretary to be used by each Federal 
     agency throughout the life of the project.

[[Page 21771]]

       (b) Report Repository.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide to the Library 
     of Congress a copy of each final feasibility study, final 
     environmental impact statement, final reevaluation report, 
     record of decision, and report to Congress prepared by the 
     Corps of Engineers.
       (2) Availability to public.--Each document described in 
     paragraph (1) shall be made available to the public, and an 
     electronic copy of each document shall be made permanently 
     available to the public through the Internet.

     SEC. 2042. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.

       Sections 101, 106, and 108 of the Energy and Water 
     Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 
     Stat. 2252-2254), are repealed.

     SEC. 2043. STUDIES AND REPORTS FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

       (a) Studies.--
       (1) Cost-sharing requirements.--Section 105(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(3) Detailed project reports.--The requirements of this 
     subsection that apply to a feasibility study also shall apply 
     to a study that results in a detailed project report, except 
     that--
       ``(A) the first $100,000 of the costs of a study that 
     results in a detailed project report shall be a Federal 
     expense; and
       ``(B) paragraph (1)(C)(ii) shall not apply to such a 
     study.''.
       (2) Planning and engineering.--Section 105(b) of such Act 
     (33 U.S.C. 2215(b)) is amended by striking ``authorized by 
     this Act''.
       (3) Definitions.--Section 105 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2215) 
     is amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(d) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       ``(1) Detailed project report.--The term `detailed project 
     report' means a report for a project not specifically 
     authorized by Congress in law or otherwise that determines 
     the feasibility of the project with a level of detail 
     appropriate to the scope and complexity of the recommended 
     solution and sufficient to proceed directly to the 
     preparation of contract plans and specifications. The term 
     includes any associated environmental impact statement and 
     mitigation plan. For a project for which the Federal cost 
     does not exceed $1,000,000, the term includes a planning and 
     design analysis document.
       ``(2) Feasibility study.--The term `feasibility study' 
     means a study that results in a feasibility report under 
     section 905, and any associated environmental impact 
     statement and mitigation plan, prepared by the Corps of 
     Engineers for a water resources project. The term includes a 
     study that results in a project implementation report 
     prepared under title VI of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), a general reevaluation 
     report, and a limited reevaluation report.''.
       (b) Reports.--
       (1) Preparation.--Section 905(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(a)) is amended--
       (A) by striking ``(a) In the case of any'' and inserting 
     the following:
       ``(a) Preparation of Reports.--
       ``(1) In general.--In the case of any'';
       (B) by striking ``the Secretary, the Secretary shall'' and 
     inserting ``the Secretary that results in recommendations 
     concerning a project or the operation of a project and that 
     requires specific authorization by Congress in law or 
     otherwise, the Secretary shall perform a reconnaissance study 
     and'';
       (C) by striking ``Such feasibility report'' and inserting 
     the following:
       ``(2) Contents of feasibility reports.--A feasibility 
     report'';
       (D) by striking ``The feasibility report'' and inserting 
     ``A feasibility report''; and
       (E) by striking the last sentence and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(3) Applicability.--This subsection shall not apply to--
       ``(A) any study with respect to which a report has been 
     submitted to Congress before the date of enactment of this 
     Act;
       ``(B) any study for a project, which project is authorized 
     for construction by this Act and is not subject to section 
     903(b);
       ``(C) any study for a project which does not require 
     specific authorization by Congress in law or otherwise; and
       ``(D) general studies not intended to lead to 
     recommendation of a specific water resources project.
       ``(4) Feasibility report defined.--In this subsection, the 
     term `feasibility report' means each feasibility report, and 
     any associated environmental impact statement and mitigation 
     plan, prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water 
     resources project. The term includes a project implementation 
     report prepared under title VI of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), a general 
     reevaluation report, and a limited reevaluation report.''.
       (2) Projects not specifically authorized by congress.--
     Section 905 of such Act is further amended--
       (A) in subsection (b) by inserting ``Reconnaissance 
     Studies.--'' before ``Before initiating'';
       (B) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as 
     subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
       (C) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
       ``(c) Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress.--In 
     the case of any water resources project-related study 
     authorized to be undertaken by the Secretary without specific 
     authorization by Congress in law or otherwise, the Secretary 
     shall prepare a detailed project report.'';
       (D) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated) by inserting 
     ``Indian Tribes.--'' before ``For purposes of''; and
       (E) in subsection (e) (as so redesignated) by inserting 
     ``Standard and Uniform Procedures and Practices.--'' before 
     ``The Secretary shall''.

     SEC. 2044. COORDINATION AND SCHEDULING OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND 
                   LOCAL ACTIONS.

       (a) Notice of Intent.--Upon request of the non-Federal 
     interest in the form of a written notice of intent to 
     construct or modify a non-Federal water supply, wastewater 
     infrastructure, flood damage reduction, storm damage 
     reduction, ecosystem restoration, or navigation project that 
     requires the approval of the Secretary, the Secretary shall 
     initiate, subject to subsection (c), procedures to establish 
     a schedule for consolidating Federal, State, and local agency 
     and Indian tribe environmental assessments, project reviews, 
     and issuance of all permits for the construction or 
     modification of the project. All States and Indian tribes 
     having jurisdiction over the proposed project shall be 
     invited by the Secretary, but shall not be required, to 
     participate in carrying out this section with respect to the 
     project.
       (b) Coordination.--The Secretary shall seek, to the extent 
     practicable, to consolidate hearing and comment periods, 
     procedures for data collection and report preparation, and 
     the environmental review and permitting processes associated 
     with the project and related activities. The Secretary shall 
     notify, to the extent possible, the non-Federal interest of 
     its responsibilities for data development and information 
     that may be necessary to process each permit required for the 
     project, including a schedule when the information and data 
     should be provided to the appropriate Federal, State, or 
     local agency or Indian tribe.
       (c) Costs of Coordination.--The costs incurred by the 
     Secretary to establish and carry out a schedule to 
     consolidate Federal, State, and local agency and Indian tribe 
     environmental assessments, project reviews, and permit 
     issuance for a project under this section shall be paid by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (d) Report on Timesavings Methods.--Not later than 3 years 
     after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary 
     shall prepare and transmit to Congress a report estimating 
     the time required for the issuance of all Federal, State, 
     local, and tribal permits for the construction of non-Federal 
     projects for water supply, wastewater infrastructure, flood 
     damage reduction, storm damage reduction, ecosystem 
     restoration, and navigation.

     SEC. 2045. PROJECT STREAMLINING.

       (a) Policy.--The benefits of water resources projects are 
     important to the Nation's economy and environment, and 
     recommendations to Congress regarding such projects should 
     not be delayed due to uncoordinated or inefficient reviews or 
     the failure to timely resolve disputes during the development 
     of water resources projects.
       (b) Scope.--This section shall apply to each study 
     initiated after the date of enactment of this Act to develop 
     a feasibility report under section 905 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282), or a reevaluation 
     report, for a water resources project if the Secretary 
     determines that such study requires an environmental impact 
     statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
     (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
       (c) Water Resources Project Review Process.--The Secretary 
     shall develop and implement a coordinated review process for 
     the development of water resources projects.
       (d) Coordinated Reviews.--The coordinated review process 
     under this section may provide that all reviews, analyses, 
     opinions, permits, licenses, and approvals that must be 
     issued or made by a Federal, State, or local government 
     agency or Indian tribe for the development of a water 
     resources project described in subsection (b) will be 
     conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, concurrently 
     and completed within a time period established by the 
     Secretary in cooperation with the agencies identified under 
     subsection (e) with respect to the project.
       (e) Identification of Jurisdictional Agencies.--With 
     respect to the development of each water resources project, 
     the Secretary shall identify, as soon as practicable, all 
     Federal, State, and local government agencies and Indian 
     tribes that may--
       (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
       (2) be required by law to conduct or issue a review, 
     analysis, or opinion for the project; or
       (3) be required to make a determination on issuing a 
     permit, license, or approval for the project.
       (f) State Authority.--If the coordinated review process is 
     being implemented under this section by the Secretary with 
     respect to the development of a water resources project 
     described in subsection (b) within the boundaries of a State, 
     the State, consistent with State law, may choose to 
     participate in the process and to make subject to the process 
     all State agencies that--
       (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
       (2) are required to conduct or issue a review, analysis, or 
     opinion for the project; or
       (3) are required to make a determination on issuing a 
     permit, license, or approval for the project.
       (g) Memorandum of Understanding.--The coordinated review 
     process developed under this section may be incorporated into 
     a memorandum of understanding for a water resources project

[[Page 21772]]

     between the Secretary, the heads of Federal, State, and local 
     government agencies, Indian tribes identified under 
     subsection (e), and the non-Federal interest for the project.
       (h) Effect of Failure to Meet Deadline.--
       (1) Notification.--If the Secretary determines that a 
     Federal, State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or 
     non-Federal interest that is participating in the coordinated 
     review process under this section with respect to the 
     development of a water resources project has not met a 
     deadline established under subsection (d) for the project, 
     the Secretary shall notify, within 30 days of the date of 
     such determination, the agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
     interest about the failure to meet the deadline.
       (2) Agency report.--Not later than 30 days after the date 
     of receipt of a notice under paragraph (1), the Federal, 
     State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-
     Federal interest involved may submit a report to the 
     Secretary, explaining why the agency, Indian tribe, or non-
     Federal interest did not meet the deadline and what actions 
     it intends to take to complete or issue the required review, 
     analysis, or opinion or determination on issuing a permit, 
     license, or approval.
       (3) Report to congress.--Not later than 30 days after the 
     date of receipt of a report under paragraph (2), the 
     Secretary shall compile and submit a report to the Committee 
     on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate, and the Council on Environmental 
     Quality, describing any deadlines identified in paragraph 
     (1), and any information provided to the Secretary by the 
     Federal, State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or 
     non-Federal interest involved under paragraph (2).
       (i) Limitations.--Nothing in this section shall preempt or 
     interfere with--
       (1) any statutory requirement for seeking public comment;
       (2) any power, jurisdiction, or authority that a Federal, 
     State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-
     Federal interest has with respect to carrying out a water 
     resources project; or
       (3) any obligation to comply with the provisions of the 
     National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the regulations 
     issued by the Council on Environmental Quality to carry out 
     such Act.

     SEC. 2046. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION.

       Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--
       (1) in the first sentence--
       (A) by striking ``two years'' and inserting ``year''; and
       (B) by striking ``7'' and inserting ``5'';
       (2) in the last sentence by striking ``30 months after the 
     date'' and inserting ``the last date of the fiscal year 
     following the fiscal year in which''; and
       (3) in the last sentence by striking ``such 30 month 
     period'' and inserting ``such period''.

     SEC. 2047. FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGES.

       (a) Hopper Dredge Mcfarland.--Section 563 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3784) is amended 
     to read as follows:

     ``SEC. 563. HOPPER DREDGE MCFARLAND.

       ``(a) Placement in Ready Reserve Status.--Not before 
     October 1, 2009, and not after December 31, 2009, the 
     Secretary shall--
       ``(1) place the Federal hopper dredge McFarland (referred 
     to in this section as the `vessel') in a ready reserve 
     status; and
       ``(2) use the vessel solely for urgent and emergency 
     purposes in accordance with existing emergency response 
     protocols.
       ``(b) Routine Tests and Maintenance.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall periodically perform 
     routine underway dredging tests of the equipment (not to 
     exceed 70 days per year) of the vessel in a ready reserve 
     status to ensure the ability of the vessel to perform urgent 
     and emergency work.
       ``(2) Maintenance.--The Secretary--
       ``(A) shall not assign any scheduled hopper dredging work 
     to the vessel other than dredging tests in the Delaware River 
     and Bay; but
       ``(B) shall perform any repairs, including any asbestos 
     abatement, necessary to maintain the vessel in a ready 
     reserve fully operational condition.
       ``(c) Active Status for Dredging.--The Secretary, in 
     consultation with affected stakeholders, shall place the 
     vessel in active status in order to perform dredging work if 
     the Secretary determines that private industry has failed--
       ``(1) to submit a responsive and responsible bid for work 
     advertised by the Secretary; or
       ``(2) to carry out a project as required pursuant to a 
     contract between the industry and the Secretary.''.
       (b) Hopper Dredges Essayons and Yaquina.--Section 
     3(c)(7)(B) of the Act of August 11, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 622; 25 
     Stat. 423), is amended by adding at the end the following: 
     ``This subparagraph shall not apply to the Federal hopper 
     dredges Essayons and Yaquina of the Corps of Engineers.''.
                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

     SEC. 3001. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.

       Section 111 of title I of division C of the Consolidated 
     Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944) is amended to read 
     as follows:

     ``SEC. 111. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.

       ``(a) Construction of New Facilities.--
       ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
     definitions apply:
       ``(A) Existing facility.--The term `existing facility' 
     means the administrative and maintenance facility for the 
     project for Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama, 
     authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
     Appropriations Act of July 5, 1884 (24 Stat. 141), in 
     existence on the date of enactment of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2007.
       ``(B) Parcel.--The term `Parcel' means the land owned by 
     the Corps of Engineers serving as the operations and 
     maintenance facility of the Corps of Engineers in the city of 
     Tuscaloosa, Alabama, in existence on the date of enactment of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
       ``(2) Authorization.--In carrying out the project for Black 
     Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama, the Secretary is 
     authorized, at Federal expense--
       ``(A) to purchase land on which the Secretary may construct 
     a new maintenance facility for the project, to be located--
       ``(i) at a different location from the existing facility; 
     and
       ``(ii) in the vicinity of the city of Tuscaloosa, Alabama;
       ``(B) at any time during or after the completion of (and 
     relocation to) the new maintenance facility, to demolish the 
     existing facility; and
       ``(C) to construct on the Parcel a new administrative 
     facility for the project.
       ``(b) Acquisition and Disposition of Property.--The 
     Secretary--
       ``(1) may acquire any real property necessary for the 
     construction of the new maintenance facility under subsection 
     (a)(2)(A); and
       ``(2) shall convey to the city of Tuscaloosa fee simple 
     title in and to any portion of the Parcel not required for 
     construction of the new administrative facility under 
     subsection (a)(2)(C) through--
       ``(A) sale at fair market value;
       ``(B) exchange for city of Tuscaloosa owned land on an 
     acre-for-acre basis; or
       ``(C) any combination of a sale under subparagraph (A) and 
     an exchange under subparagraph (B).
       ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $32,000,000.''.

     SEC. 3002. COOK INLET, ALASKA.

       Section 118(a)(3) of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 2005 (title I of division C of the 
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005; 118 Stat. 2945) is 
     amended by inserting ``as part of the operation and 
     maintenance of such project modification'' after ``by the 
     Secretary''.

     SEC. 3003. KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA.

       The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
     for the project for navigation, King Cove Harbor, Alaska, 
     being carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall be $8,000,000.

     SEC. 3004. SEWARD HARBOR, ALASKA.

       The project for navigation, Seward Harbor, Alaska, 
     authorized by section 101(a)(3) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 274), is modified to 
     authorize the Secretary to extend the existing breakwater by 
     approximately 215 feet, at a total cost of $3,333,000, with 
     an estimated Federal cost of $2,666,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $667,000.

     SEC. 3005. SITKA, ALASKA.

       The Sitka, Alaska, element of the project for navigation, 
     Southeast Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska, authorized by 
     section 101(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (106 Stat. 4801), is modified to direct the Secretary to take 
     such action as is necessary to correct design deficiencies in 
     the Sitka Harbor Breakwater at Federal expense. The estimated 
     cost is $6,300,000.

     SEC. 3006. TATITLEK, ALASKA.

       The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
     for the project for navigation, Tatitlek, Alaska, being 
     carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall be $10,000,000.

     SEC. 3007. RIO DE FLAG, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA.

       The project for flood damage reduction, Rio De Flag, 
     Flagstaff, Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
     at a total cost of $54,100,000, with an estimated Federal 
     cost of $35,000,000 and a non-Federal cost of $19,100,000.

     SEC. 3008. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL 
                   PROJECT, ARIZONA.

       The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and 
     tributaries, Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) and 
     modified by section 303 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711) and section 302 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2600), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
     at a total cost of $25,410,000, with an estimated Federal 
     cost of $22,930,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $2,480,000.

     SEC. 3009. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, ARIZONA.

       The project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
     restoration, and recreation, Tucson drainage area, Arizona, 
     authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 274), is modified to 
     authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total 
     cost of $66,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $43,350,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,350,000.

     SEC. 3010. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARKANSAS.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Osceola 
     Harbor, Arkansas, constructed under section 107 of the River 
     and Harbor Act of 1960

[[Page 21773]]

     (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to allow non-Federal interests 
     to construct a mooring facility within the existing 
     authorized harbor channel, subject to all necessary permits, 
     certifications, and other requirements.
       (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
     section shall be construed as affecting the responsibility of 
     the Secretary to maintain the general navigation features of 
     the project at a bottom width of 250 feet.

     SEC. 3011. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

       The project for flood control, St. Francis River Basin, 
     Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by the Act of June 15, 1936 
     (49 Stat. 1508), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
     undertake channel stabilization and sediment removal measures 
     on the St. Francis River and tributaries as a nonseparable 
     element of the original project.

     SEC. 3012. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, ARKANSAS.

       The Pine Mountain Dam feature of the project for flood 
     protection, Lee Creek, Arkansas and Oklahoma, authorized by 
     section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1078), 
     is modified--
       (1) to add environmental restoration as a project purpose; 
     and
       (2) to direct the Secretary to finance the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of the project, including treatment and 
     distributions components, over a 30-year period in accordance 
     with section 103(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(k)).

     SEC. 3013. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKANSAS AND 
                   LOUISIANA.

       (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1950 (64 Stat. 173) is amended in the matter under the 
     heading ``red-ouachita river basin'' by striking 
     ``improvements at Calion, Arkansas'' and inserting 
     ``improvements at Calion, Arkansas (including authorization 
     for the comprehensive flood-control project for Ouachita 
     River and tributaries, incorporating in the project all flood 
     control, drainage, and power improvements in the basin above 
     the lower end of the left bank Ouachita River levee)''.
       (b) Modification.--Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 
     August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 642), is amended in the second 
     sentence of subsection (a) in the matter under the heading 
     ``lower mississippi river'' by inserting before the period at 
     the end the following: ``; except that the Ouachita River 
     Levees, Louisiana, authorized by the first section of the 
     Mississippi River Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 
     534), shall remain as a component of the Mississippi River 
     and Tributaries Project and afforded operation and 
     maintenance responsibilities as provided under section 3 of 
     that Act (45 Stat. 535)''.

     SEC. 3014. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cache Creek 
     Basin, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to mitigate the impacts of 
     the new south levee of the Cache Creek settling basin on the 
     storm drainage system of the city of Woodland, including all 
     appurtenant features, erosion control measures, and 
     environmental protection features.
       (b) Objectives.--Mitigation under subsection (a) shall 
     restore the preproject capacity of the city of Woodland to 
     release 1,360 cubic feet per second of water to the Yolo 
     Bypass and shall include--
       (1) channel improvements;
       (2) an outlet work through the west levee of the Yolo 
     Bypass; and
       (3) a new low flow cross channel to handle city and county 
     storm drainage and settling basin flows (1,760 cubic feet per 
     second) when the Yolo Bypass is in a low flow condition.

     SEC. 3015. CALFED STABILITY PROGRAM, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Amendments.--Section 103(f)(3) of the Water Supply, 
     Reliability, and Environmental Improvement Act (118 Stat. 
     1695-1696) is amended--
       (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``within the Delta (as 
     defined in Cal. Water Code Sec. 12220)'';
       (2) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(C) Justification.--
       ``(i) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), in carrying out levee 
     stability programs and projects pursuant to this paragraph, 
     the Secretary of the Army may determine that the programs and 
     projects are justified by the benefits of the project 
     purposes described in subparagraph (A), and the programs and 
     projects shall require no additional economic justification 
     if the Secretary of the Army further determines that the 
     programs and projects are cost effective.
       ``(ii) Applicability.--Clause (i) shall not apply to any 
     separable element intended to produce benefits that are 
     predominantly unrelated to the project purposes described in 
     subparagraph (A).''; and
       (3) in subparagraph (D)(i) by inserting ``as described in 
     the Record of Decision'' after ``Public Law 84-99 
     standard)''.
       (b) Additional Authorization of Appropriations.--In 
     addition to funds made available pursuant to the Water 
     Supply, Reliability, and Environmental Improvement Act 
     (Public Law 108-361) to carry out section 103(f)(3)(D) of 
     that Act (118 Stat. 1696), there is authorized to be 
     appropriated to carry out projects described in that section 
     $106,000,000, to remain available until expended.

     SEC. 3016. COMPTON CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood control, Los Angeles Drainage Area, 
     California, authorized by section 101(b) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), is 
     modified to add environmental restoration and recreation as 
     project purposes.

     SEC. 3017. GRAYSON CREEK/MURDERER'S CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grayson 
     Creek/Murderer's Creek, California, being carried out under 
     section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified--
       (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
     agreement for the project; and
       (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national 
     ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal 
     interest in the project.

     SEC. 3018. HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for environmental restoration, Hamilton 
     Airfield, California, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to construct the project 
     substantially in accordance with the report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated July 19, 2004, at a total cost of 
     $228,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $171,100,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $57,000,000.

     SEC. 3019. JOHN F. BALDWIN SHIP CHANNEL AND STOCKTON SHIP 
                   CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for navigation, San Francisco to Stockton, 
     California, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091) is modified--
       (1) to provide that the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     the John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel 
     element of the project may be provided in the form of in-kind 
     services and materials; and
       (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of such 
     element the cost of planning and design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for such element before the date of 
     an agreement for such planning and design.

     SEC. 3020. KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood control, Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, 
     California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3658), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project, or provide reimbursement not to exceed $800,000, for 
     the costs of any work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
     for the project before the date of the project partnership 
     agreement.

     SEC. 3021. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, 
     Larkspur, California, authorized by section 601(d) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to determine whether 
     maintenance of the project is feasible, and if the Secretary 
     determines that maintenance of the project is feasible, to 
     carry out such maintenance.

     SEC. 3022. LLAGAS CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
     Llagas Creek, California, authorized by section 501(a) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 333), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to carry out the project at 
     a total cost of $105,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
     of $65,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $40,000,000.
       (b) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the 
     project, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest 
     to participate in the financing of the project in accordance 
     with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the detailed project report 
     evaluation indicates that applying such section is necessary 
     to implement the project.

     SEC. 3023. MAGPIE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The project for Magpie Creek, California, 
     authorized under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
     (33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
     apply the cost-sharing requirements of section 103(b) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4085) for 
     the portion of the project consisting of land acquisition to 
     preserve and enhance existing floodwater storage.
       (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of planning and design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.
       (c) Cost.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
     expended for the project referred to in subsection (a) shall 
     be $10,000,000.

     SEC. 3024. PACIFIC FLYWAY CENTER, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pacific 
     Flyway Center, Sacramento, California, being carried out 
     under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
     to expend $2,000,000 to enhance public access to the project.

[[Page 21774]]



     SEC. 3025. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood damage reduction, Petaluma River, 
     Petaluma, California, authorized by section 112 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2587), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
     at a total cost of $41,500,000, with an estimated Federal 
     cost of $26,975,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $14,525,000.

     SEC. 3026. PINOLE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for improvement of the quality of the 
     environment, Pinole Creek Phase I, California, being carried 
     out under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
     non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3027. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA.

       Upon completion of the modifications to the Prado Dam 
     element of the project for flood control, Santa Ana River 
     Mainstem, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113), the 
     Memorandum of Agreement for the Operation for Prado Dam for 
     Seasonal Additional Water Conservation between the Department 
     of the Army and the Orange County Water District (including 
     all the conditions and stipulations in the memorandum) shall 
     remain in effect for volumes of water made available prior to 
     such modifications.

     SEC. 3028. REDWOOD CITY NAVIGATION CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary may dredge the Redwood City Navigation 
     Channel, California, on an annual basis, to maintain the 
     authorized depth of -30 feet mean lower low water.

     SEC. 3029. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Natomas Levee Features.--
       (1) In general.--The project for flood control and 
     recreation, Sacramento and American Rivers, California 
     (Natomas Levee features), authorized by section 9159 of the 
     Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 
     1944), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
     $20,503,000 to the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency for 
     the nonreimbursed Federal share of costs incurred by the 
     Agency in connection with the project.
       (2) Allocation of credit.--The Secretary shall allocate the 
     amount to be credited pursuant to paragraph (1) toward the 
     non-Federal share of such projects as are requested by the 
     Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.
       (b) Joint Federal Project at Folsom Dam.--
       (1) In general.--The project for flood control, American 
     and Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 
     101(a)(6)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 274) and modified by section 128 of the Energy and 
     Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), 
     is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
     auxiliary spillway generally in accordance with the Post 
     Authorization Change Report, American River Watershed Project 
     (Folsom Dam Modification and Folsom Dam Raise Projects), 
     dated March 2007, at a total cost of $683,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $444,000,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $239,000,000.
       (2) Dam safety.--Nothing in this subsection limits the 
     authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out dam 
     safety activities in connection with the auxiliary spillway 
     in accordance with the Bureau of Reclamation safety of dams 
     program.
       (3) Transfer of funds.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary and the Secretary of the 
     Interior are authorized to transfer between the Department of 
     the Army and the Department of the Interior appropriated 
     amounts and other available funds (including funds 
     contributed by non-Federal interests) for the purpose of 
     planning, design, and construction of the auxiliary spillway.
       (B) Terms and conditions.--Any transfer made pursuant to 
     this subsection shall be subject to such terms and conditions 
     as may be agreed on by the Secretary and the Secretary of the 
     Interior.

     SEC. 3030. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship 
     Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of planning and design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3031. SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION, CALIFORNIA.

       Section 202 of the River Basin Monetary Authorization Act 
     of 1974 (88 Stat. 49) is amended by striking ``and the 
     monetary authorization'' and all that follows through the 
     period at the end and inserting ``; except that the lineal 
     feet in the second phase shall be increased from 405,000 
     lineal feet to 485,000 lineal feet.''.

     SEC. 3032. SALTON SEA RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       (1) Salton sea authority.--The term ``Salton Sea 
     Authority'' means the joint powers authority established 
     under the laws of the State by a joint power agreement signed 
     on June 2, 1993.
       (2) Salton sea science office.--The term ``Salton Sea 
     Science Office'' means the office established by the United 
     States Geological Survey and located on the date of enactment 
     of this Act in La Quinta, California.
       (3) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of 
     California.
       (b) Pilot Projects.--
       (1) In general.--
       (A) Review.--The Secretary shall review the plan approved 
     by the State, entitled the ``Salton Sea Ecosystem Restoration 
     Program Preferred Alternative Report and Funding Plan'', and 
     dated May 2007 to determine whether the pilot projects 
     described in the plan are feasible.
       (B) Implementation.--
       (i) In general.--Subject to clause (ii), if the Secretary 
     determines that the pilot projects referred to in 
     subparagraph (A) meet the requirements described in that 
     subparagraph, the Secretary may--

       (I) enter into an agreement with the State; and
       (II) in consultation with the Salton Sea Authority and the 
     Salton Sea Science Office, carry out pilot projects for 
     improvement of the environment in the area of the Salton Sea.

       (ii) Requirement.--The Secretary shall be a party to each 
     contract for construction entered into under this 
     subparagraph.
       (2) Local participation.--In prioritizing pilot projects 
     under this section, the Secretary shall--
       (A) consult with the State, the Salton Sea Authority, and 
     the Salton Sea Science Office; and
       (B) take into consideration the priorities of the State and 
     the Salton Sea Authority.
       (3) Cost sharing.--Before carrying out a pilot project 
     under this section, the Secretary shall enter into a written 
     agreement with the State that requires the non-Federal 
     interest for the pilot project to pay 35 percent of the total 
     costs of the pilot project.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out subsection (b) $30,000,000, 
     of which not more than $5,000,000 shall be used for any one 
     pilot project under this section.

     SEC. 3033. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem 
     (including Santiago Creek, California), authorized by section 
     401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
     Stat. 4113) and modified by section 104 of the Energy and 
     Water Development Appropriation Act, 1988 (101 Stat. 1329-
     111) and section 309 of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1996 (110 Stat. 3713), is further modified to authorize 
     the Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of 
     $1,800,000,000 and to clarify that the Santa Ana River 
     Interceptor Line is an element of the project.

     SEC. 3034. SANTA BARBARA STREAMS, LOWER MISSION CREEK, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood damage reduction, Santa Barbara 
     streams, Lower Mission Creek, California, authorized by 
     section 101(b)(8) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
     to construct the project at a total cost of $30,000,000, with 
     an estimated Federal cost of $15,000,000 and an estimated 
     non-Federal cost of $15,000,000.

     SEC. 3035. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for navigation, Santa Cruz Harbor, California, 
     authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
     (72 Stat. 300) and modified by section 809 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4168) and 
     section 526 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 346), is modified to direct the Secretary--
       (1) to renegotiate the memorandum of agreement with the 
     non-Federal interest to increase the annual payment to 
     reflect the updated cost of operation and maintenance that is 
     the Federal and non-Federal share as provided by law based on 
     the project purpose; and
       (2) to revise the memorandum of agreement to include terms 
     that revise such payments for inflation.

     SEC. 3036. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, 
     authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113) and modified by 
     section 104 of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 1988 (101 Stat. 1329-11), section 102(e) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 
     4611), and section 311 of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1996 (110 Stat. 3713), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary--
       (1) to include ecosystem restoration benefits in the 
     calculation of benefits for the Seven Oaks Dam, California, 
     portion of the project; and
       (2) to conduct a study of water conservation and water 
     quality at the Seven Oaks Dam.

     SEC. 3037. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, 
     Upper Guadalupe River, California, authorized by section 
     101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
     Stat. 275), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
     construct the project generally in accordance with the Upper 
     Guadalupe River Flood Damage Reduction, San Jose, California, 
     Limited Reevaluation Report, dated March 2004, at a total 
     cost of $256,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $136,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $119,300,000.

[[Page 21775]]



     SEC. 3038. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Walnut Creek 
     Channel, California, being carried out under section 206 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), 
     is modified--
       (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
     agreement for the project; and
       (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national 
     ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal 
     interest in the project.

     SEC. 3039. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for improvement of the quality of the 
     environment, Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California, 
     being carried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified to 
     direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
     221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
     toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
     cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
     project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project.

     SEC. 3040. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE II, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wildcat/San 
     Pablo Creek Phase II, California, being carried out under 
     section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
     credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
     by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
     of the partnership agreement for the project and to authorize 
     the Secretary to consider national ecosystem restoration 
     benefits in determining the Federal interest in the project.

     SEC. 3041. YUBA RIVER BASIN PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, 
     California, authorized by section 101(a)(10) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is 
     modified--
       (1) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
     a total cost of $107,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
     of $70,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $37,700,000; and
       (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
     agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3042. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, COLORADO.

       Section 808 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4168) is amended by striking ``agriculture,'' and 
     inserting ``agriculture, environmental restoration,''.

     SEC. 3043. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO 
                   CHESAPEAKE BAY, DELAWARE AND MARYLAND.

       The project for navigation, Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware 
     River to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by 
     the first section of the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 
     1935 (49 Stat. 1030), and section 101 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1249), is modified to add recreation as 
     a project purpose.

     SEC. 3044. ST. GEORGE'S BRIDGE, DELAWARE.

       Section 102(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1990 (104 Stat. 4612) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following: ``The Secretary shall assume ownership 
     responsibility for the replacement bridge not later than the 
     date on which the construction of the bridge is completed and 
     the contractors are released of their responsibility by the 
     State. In addition, the Secretary may not carry out any 
     action to close or remove the St. George's Bridge, Delaware, 
     without specific congressional authorization.''.

     SEC. 3045. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

       (a) Shoreline.--The project for shoreline protection, 
     Brevard County, Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(7) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), 
     is modified to authorize the Secretary to include the mid-
     reach as an element of the project from the Florida 
     department of environmental protection monuments 75.4 to 
     118.3, a distance of approximately 7.6 miles. The restoration 
     work shall only be undertaken upon a determination by the 
     Secretary, following completion of the general reevaluation 
     report authorized by section 418 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2637), that the shoreline 
     protection is feasible.
       (b) Credit.--Section 310 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301) is amended by adding at the end 
     the following:
       ``(d) Credit.--After completion of the study, the Secretary 
     may credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the project for shore protection 
     the cost of nourishment and renourishment associated with the 
     project for shore protection incurred by the non-Federal 
     interest to respond to damages to Brevard County beaches that 
     are the result of a Federal navigation project, as determined 
     in the final report for the study.''.

     SEC. 3046. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

       The project for shore protection, Broward County and 
     Hillsboro Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the 
     River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090), and modified by 
     section 311 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 301), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
     credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of the project the cost of mitigation 
     construction and derelict erosion control structure removal 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3047. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA.

       In carrying out the project for navigation, Canaveral 
     Harbor, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
     Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1174), the Secretary shall 
     construct a sediment trap if the Secretary determines 
     construction of the sediment trap is feasible.

     SEC. 3048. GASPARILLA AND ESTERO ISLANDS, FLORIDA.

       The project for shore protection, Gasparilla and Estero 
     Island segments, Lee County, Florida, authorized by section 
     201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1073), by 
     Senate Resolution dated December 17, 1970, and by House 
     Resolution dated December 15, 1970, and modified by section 
     309 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
     2602), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
     Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3049. LIDO KEY BEACH, SARASOTA, FLORIDA.

       (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lido Key 
     Beach, Sarasota, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the 
     River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819), deauthorized 
     under section 1001(b) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), and reauthorized by section 
     364(2)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
     Stat. 313), is modified to direct the Secretary to construct 
     the project substantially in accordance with the report of 
     the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total 
     cost of $15,190,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $9,320,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,870,000, 
     and at an estimated total cost of $65,000,000 for periodic 
     nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $30,550,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $34,450,000.
       (b) Construction of Shoreline Protection Projects by Non-
     Federal Interests.--The Secretary shall enter into a 
     partnership agreement with the non-Federal interest in 
     accordance with section 206 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-1) for the modified 
     project.

     SEC. 3050. PEANUT ISLAND, FLORIDA.

       The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
     for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
     environment, Peanut Island, Palm Beach County, Florida, being 
     carried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be 
     $9,750,000.

     SEC. 3051. PORT SUTTON, FLORIDA.

       The project for navigation, Port Sutton, Florida, 
     authorized by section 101(b)(12) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified to 
     authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at a total 
     cost of $12,900,000.

     SEC. 3052. TAMPA HARBOR-BIG BEND CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

       The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, 
     Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276) is modified 
     to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
     221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
     toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
     cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out 
     by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
     of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3053. TAMPA HARBOR CUT B, FLORIDA.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, 
     Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818), is modified to authorize the 
     Secretary to construct passing lanes in an area approximately 
     3.5 miles long and centered on Tampa Harbor Cut B if the 
     Secretary determines that such improvements are necessary for 
     navigation safety.
       (b) General Reevaluation Report.--The non-Federal share of 
     the cost of the general reevaluation report for Tampa Harbor, 
     Florida, being conducted on June 1, 2005, shall be the same 
     percentage as the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     construction of the project.
       (c) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new 
     partnership agreement with the non-Federal interest to 
     reflect the cost sharing required by subsection (b).

     SEC. 3054. ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA.

       (a) Land Exchange.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may exchange land above 863 
     feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in 
     the Real Estate Design Memorandum prepared by the Mobile 
     district engineer, April 5, 1996, and approved October 8, 
     1996, for land on the north side of Allatoona Lake that is 
     required for wildlife management and protection of the water 
     quality and overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
       (2) Terms and conditions.--The basis for all land exchanges 
     under this subsection shall be a

[[Page 21776]]

     fair market appraisal to ensure that land exchanged is of 
     equal value.
       (b) Disposal and Acquisition of Land, Allatoona Lake, 
     Georgia.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may--
       (A) sell land above 863 feet in elevation at Allatoona 
     Lake, Georgia, identified in the memorandum referred to in 
     subsection (a)(1); and
       (B) use the proceeds of the sale, without further 
     appropriation, to pay costs associated with the purchase of 
     land required for wildlife management and protection of the 
     water quality and overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
       (2) Terms and conditions.--
       (A) Willing sellers.--Land acquired under this subsection 
     shall be by negotiated purchase from willing sellers only.
       (B) Basis.--The basis for all transactions under this 
     subsection shall be a fair market value appraisal acceptable 
     to the Secretary.
       (C) Sharing of costs.--Each purchaser of land under this 
     subsection shall share in the associated costs of the 
     purchase, including surveys and associated fees in accordance 
     with the memorandum referred to in subsection (a)(1).
       (D) Other conditions.--The Secretary may impose on the sale 
     and purchase of land under this subsection such other 
     conditions as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
       (c) Repeal.--Section 325 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed.

     SEC. 3055. LATHAM RIVER, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA.

       The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
     for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
     environment, Latham River, Glynn County, Georgia, being 
     carried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be 
     $6,175,000.

     SEC. 3056. DWORSHAK RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS, IDAHO.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out additional 
     general construction measures to allow for operation at lower 
     pool levels to satisfy the recreation mission at Dworshak 
     Dam, Idaho.
       (b) Improvements.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
     Secretary shall provide for appropriate improvements to--
       (1) facilities that are operated by the Corps of Engineers; 
     and
       (2) facilities that, as of the date of enactment of this 
     Act, are leased, permitted, or licensed for use by others.
       (c) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary shall carry out this 
     section through a cost-sharing program with Idaho State parks 
     and recreation department at a total estimated project cost 
     of $5,300,000. Notwithstanding section 103 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2313), the 
     Federal share of such cost shall be 75 percent.

     SEC. 3057. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Gooding, 
     Idaho, constructed under the emergency conservation work 
     program established under the Act of March 31, 1933 (16 
     U.S.C. 585 et seq.), is modified--
       (1) to direct the Secretary to rehabilitate the Gooding 
     Channel project for the purposes of flood control and 
     ecosystem restoration if the Secretary determines that such 
     rehabilitation is not required as a result of improper 
     operation and maintenance of the project by the non-Federal 
     interest and that the rehabilitation and ecosystem 
     restoration is feasible; and
       (2) to direct the Secretary to plan, design, and construct 
     the project at a total cost of $9,000,000.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) In general.--Costs for reconstruction of a project 
     under this section shall be shared by the Secretary and the 
     non-Federal interest in the same percentages as the costs of 
     construction of the original project were shared.
       (2) Operation, maintenance, and repair costs.--The costs of 
     operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of a 
     project carried out under this section shall be a non-Federal 
     responsibility.
       (c) Economic Justification.--Reconstruction efforts and 
     activities carried out under this section shall not require 
     economic justification.

     SEC. 3058. BEARDSTOWN COMMUNITY BOAT HARBOR, BEARDSTOWN, 
                   ILLINOIS.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Muscooten Bay, 
     Illinois River, Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, 
     Illinois, constructed under section 107 of the River and 
     Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified--
       (1) to include the channel between the harbor and the 
     Illinois River; and
       (2) to direct the Secretary to enter into a partnership 
     agreement with the city of Beardstown to replace the local 
     cooperation agreement dated August 18, 1983, with the 
     Beardstown Community Park District.
       (b) Terms of Partnership Agreement.--The partnership 
     agreement referred to in subsection (a) shall include the 
     same rights and responsibilities as the local cooperation 
     agreement dated August 18, 1983, changing only the identity 
     of the non-Federal sponsor.
       (c) Maintenance.--Following execution of the partnership 
     agreement referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary may 
     carry out maintenance of the project referred to in 
     subsection (a) on an annual basis.

     SEC. 3059. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS.

       The Cache River Levee constructed for flood control at the 
     Cache River, Illinois, and authorized by the Act of June 28, 
     1938 (52 Stat. 1217), is modified to add environmental 
     restoration as a project purpose.

     SEC. 3060. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS.

       The Federal navigation channel for the North Branch Channel 
     portion of the Chicago River authorized by section 22 of the 
     Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1156), extending from 100 feet 
     downstream of the Halsted Street Bridge to 100 feet upstream 
     of the Division Street Bridge, Chicago, Illinois, shall be no 
     wider than 66 feet.

     SEC. 3061. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS 
                   PROJECT, ILLINOIS.

       (a) Treatment as Single Project.--The Chicago Sanitary and 
     Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier Project (in this section 
     referred to as ``Barrier I''), as in existence on the date of 
     enactment of this Act and constructed as a demonstration 
     project under section 1202(i)(3) of the Nonindigenous Aquatic 
     Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 
     4722(i)(3)), and the project relating to the Chicago Sanitary 
     and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, authorized by section 345 
     of the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public 
     Law 108-335; 118 Stat. 1352) (in this section referred to as 
     ``Barrier II'') shall be considered to constitute a single 
     project.
       (b) Authorization.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall--
       (A) upgrade and make permanent Barrier I;
       (B) construct Barrier II, notwithstanding the project 
     cooperation agreement with the State of Illinois dated June 
     14, 2005;
       (C) operate and maintain Barrier I and Barrier II as a 
     system to optimize effectiveness;
       (D) conduct, in consultation with appropriate Federal, 
     State, local, and nongovernmental entities, a study of a 
     range of options and technologies for reducing impacts of 
     hazards that may reduce the efficacy of the Barriers; and
       (E) provide to each State a credit in an amount equal to 
     the amount of funds contributed by the State toward Barrier 
     II.
       (2) Use of credit.--A State may apply a credit provided to 
     the State under paragraph (1)(E) to any cost sharing 
     responsibility for an existing or future Federal project 
     carried out by the Secretary in the State.
       (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 345 of the District of 
     Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 
     Stat. 1352) is amended to read as follows:

     ``SEC. 345. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL 
                   BARRIER, ILLINOIS.

       ``There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may 
     be necessary to carry out the Barrier II element of the 
     project for the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal 
     Barrier, Illinois, initiated pursuant to section 1135 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2294 note; 
     100 Stat. 4251).''.
       (d) Feasibility Study.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
     appropriate Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental 
     entities, shall conduct, at Federal expense, a feasibility 
     study of the range of options and technologies available to 
     prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species between the 
     Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins through the Chicago 
     Sanitary and Ship Canal and other aquatic pathways.

     SEC. 3062. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS.

       (a) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds 
     that may be expended for the project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Emiquon, Illinois, being carried out under 
     section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2330), shall be $7,500,000.
       (b) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
     eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance 
     under section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
     construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors 
     for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved August 
     18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

     SEC. 3063. LASALLE, ILLINOIS.

       In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639-4640), the Secretary 
     shall give priority to work in the vicinity of LaSalle, 
     Illinois, on the Illinois and Michigan Canal.

     SEC. 3064. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS.

       (a) Project Purpose.--The project for flood control, Spunky 
     Bottoms, Illinois, authorized by section 5 of the Flood 
     Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1583), is modified to 
     add environmental restoration as a project purpose.
       (b) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds 
     that may be expended for the project for improvement of the 
     quality of the environment, Spunky Bottoms, Illinois, being 
     carried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), shall be 
     $7,500,000.
       (c) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
     eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance 
     under section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
     construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors 
     for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved August 
     18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
       (d) Post Construction Monitoring and Management.--Of the 
     Federal funds expended under subsection (b), not less than 
     $500,000 shall remain available for a period of 5 years after 
     the date of completion of construction of the modifications 
     for use in carrying out post construction monitoring and 
     adaptive management.

     SEC. 3065. CEDAR LAKE, INDIANA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to plan, 
     design, and construct an aquatic ecosystem restoration 
     project at Cedar Lake, Indiana.
       (b) Complete Feasibility Report.--In planning the project 
     authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary shall expedite 
     completion of the feasibility report for the project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection, Cedar Lake,

[[Page 21777]]

     Indiana, initiated pursuant to section 206 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
       (c) Authorization.--
       (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
     $11,050,000 to carry out the activities authorized by this 
     section.
       (2) Other.--The Secretary is authorized to use funds 
     previously appropriated for the project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration and protection, Cedar Lake, Indiana, under 
     section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act 1996 (33 
     U.S.C. 2330) to carry out the activities authorized by this 
     section.

     SEC. 3066. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.

       The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Koontz Lake, 
     Indiana, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) and 
     modified by section 520 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2655), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary to seek to reduce the cost of the project by using 
     innovative technologies and cost reduction measures 
     determined from a review of non-Federal lake dredging 
     projects in the vicinity of Koontz Lake.

     SEC. 3067. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

       The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of 
     White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act 
     entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
     public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for 
     other purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1586), and 
     modified by section 323 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716) and section 322 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 303), is 
     modified--
       (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the ecosystem 
     restoration, recreation, and flood damage reduction 
     components described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront 
     Concept Plan, dated February 1994, and revised by the Master 
     Plan Revision Central Indianapolis Waterfront, dated April 
     2004, at a total cost of $28,545,000; and
       (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of planning, design, and construction work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3068. DES MOINES RIVER AND GREENBELT, IOWA.

       The project for the Des Moines Recreational River and 
     Greenbelt, Iowa, authorized by Public Law 99-88 and modified 
     by section 604 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4153), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
     carry out ecosystem restoration, recreation, and flood damage 
     reduction components of the project, at a Federal cost of 
     $10,000,000.

     SEC. 3069. PERRY CREEK, IOWA.

       (a) In General.--On making a determination described in 
     subsection (b), the Secretary shall increase the Federal 
     contribution by up to $4,000,000 for the project for flood 
     control, Perry Creek, Iowa, authorized by section 401(a) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4116) 
     and modified by section 151 of the Energy and Water 
     Development Appropriations Act, 2004 (117 Stat. 1844).
       (b) Determination.--A determination referred to in 
     subsection (a) is a determination that a modification to the 
     project described in subsection (a) is necessary for the 
     Federal Emergency Management Agency to certify that the 
     project provides flood damage reduction benefits to at least 
     a 100-year level of flood protection.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $4,000,000.

     SEC. 3070. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA.

       (a) Right of First Refusal.--The Secretary shall provide, 
     in accordance with the recommendations in the Rathbun Lake 
     Reallocation Report approved by the Chief of Engineers on 
     July 22, 1985, the Rathbun Regional Water Association with 
     the right of first refusal to contract for or purchase any 
     increment of the remaining allocation of 8,320 acre-feet of 
     water supply storage in Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
       (b) Payment of Cost.--The Rathbun Regional Water 
     Association shall pay the cost of any water supply storage 
     allocation provided under subsection (a).

     SEC. 3071. HICKMAN BLUFF STABILIZATION, KENTUCKY.

       The project for Hickman Bluff, Kentucky, authorized by 
     chapter II of title II of the Emergency Supplemental 
     Appropriations and Rescissions for the Department of Defense 
     to Preserve and Enhance Military Readiness Act of 1995 (109 
     Stat. 85), is modified to authorize the Secretary to repair 
     and restore the project, at Federal expense, with no further 
     economic studies or analyses, at a total cost of not more 
     than $250,000.

     SEC. 3072. MCALPINE LOCK AND DAM, KENTUCKY AND INDIANA.

       Section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) is amended by striking 
     ``$219,600,000'' each place it appears and inserting 
     ``$430,000,000''.

     SEC. 3073. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY.

       The Prestonsburg, Kentucky, element of the project for 
     flood control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and 
     Cumberland Rivers, West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, 
     authorized by section 202(a) of the Energy and Water 
     Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide 
     a 100-year level of flood protection for the city of 
     Prestonsburg.

     SEC. 3074. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON 
                   ROUGE PARISH WATERSHED.

       The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, 
     Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge 
     Parish Watershed, authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 277) and 
     modified by section 116 of division D of Public Law 108-7 
     (117 Stat. 140), is further modified--
       (1) to direct the Secretary to carry out the project with 
     the cost sharing for the project determined in accordance 
     with section 103(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in effect on October 11, 1996;
       (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
     a total cost of $187,000,000; and
       (3) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
     agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3075. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.

       (a) Acquisition of Additional Land.--The public access 
     feature of the project for flood control, Atchafalaya Basin 
     Floodway System, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142), 
     is modified to authorize the Secretary to acquire from 
     willing sellers the fee interest (exclusive of oil, gas, and 
     minerals) of an additional 20,000 acres of land in the Lower 
     Atchafalaya Basin Floodway for such feature.
       (b) Modification.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), effective 
     November 17, 1986, the $32,000,000 limitation on the maximum 
     Federal expenditure for the first costs of the public access 
     feature referred to in subsection (a) shall not apply.
       (2) Cost.--The modification under paragraph (1) shall not 
     increase the total authorized cost of the project referred to 
     in subsection (a).
       (c) Technical Amendment.--Section 315(a)(2) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2603) is amended 
     by inserting before the period at the end the following: 
     ``and shall consider Eagle Point Park, Jeanerette, Louisiana, 
     and the town of Melville, Louisiana, as site alternatives for 
     such recreation features''.

     SEC. 3076. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, REGIONAL 
                   VISITOR CENTER, LOUISIANA.

       (a) Project for Flood Control.--Notwithstanding paragraph 
     (3) of the report of the Chief of Engineers dated February 
     28, 1983 (relating to recreational development in the Lower 
     Atchafalaya Basin Floodway), the Secretary shall carry out 
     the project for flood control, Atchafalaya Basin Floodway 
     System, Louisiana, authorized by chapter IV of title I of the 
     Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 313) and 
     section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4142).
       (b) Visitors Center.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     State of Louisiana, shall study, design, and construct a type 
     A regional visitors center in the vicinity of Morgan City, 
     Louisiana.
       (2) Cost sharing.--
       (A) Cost of type b visitors center.--The cost of 
     construction of the visitors center up to the cost of 
     construction of a type B visitors center shall be shared in 
     accordance with the recreation cost-sharing requirement of 
     section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)).
       (B) Cost of upgrading.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of upgrading the visitors center from a type B to type A 
     regional visitors center shall be 100 percent.
       (C) Operation and maintenance.--The cost of operation and 
     maintenance of the visitors center shall be a Federal 
     responsibility.
       (3) Donations.--In carrying out the project under this 
     subsection, the Mississippi River Commission may accept the 
     donation of cash or other funds, land, materials, and 
     services from any non-Federal government entity or nonprofit 
     corporation, as the Commission determines to be appropriate.

     SEC. 3077. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND 
                   BLACK, LOUISIANA.

       The project for navigation, Atchafalaya River and Bayous 
     Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana, authorized by section 101 
     of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to deepen up to a 1000-
     foot section of the area on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 
     west of the Bayou Boeuf Lock and east of the intersection of 
     the Atchafalaya River, at a cost not to exceed $200,000, to 
     provide for ingress and egress to the port of Morgan City at 
     a depth not to exceed 20 feet.

     SEC. 3078. BAYOU PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA.

       The project for the improvement of the quality of the 
     environment, Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana, being carried out 
     under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified to direct the Secretary 
     to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3079. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LOUISIANA.

       The project for the Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana, 
     authorized by section 101 of the

[[Page 21778]]

     River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481), is modified to 
     authorize the Secretary to provide $3,000,000 for each fiscal 
     year, in a total amount of $15,000,000, for such rock bank 
     protection of the Calcasieu River from mile 5 to mile 16 as 
     the Secretary determines to be advisable to reduce 
     maintenance dredging needs and facilitate protection of 
     disposal areas for the Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana, 
     if the Secretary determines that the rock bank protection is 
     feasible.

     SEC. 3080. RED RIVER (J. BENNETT JOHNSTON) WATERWAY, 
                   LOUISIANA.

       The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, Red 
     River Waterway, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142) 
     and modified by section 4(h) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4016), section 102(p) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613), 
     section 301(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3710), and section 316 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2604), is modified--
       (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at 
     a total cost of $33,912,000;
       (2) to authorize the purchase and reforestation of lands 
     that have been cleared or converted to agricultural uses (in 
     addition to the purchase of bottomland hardwood); and
       (3) to incorporate wildlife and forestry management 
     practices to improve species diversity on mitigation land 
     that meets habitat goals and objectives of the United States 
     and the State of Louisiana.

     SEC. 3081. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA.

       The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, authorized 
     as part of the project for hurricane-flood protection on Lake 
     Pontchartrain, Louisiana, by section 204 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077) and modified by section 365 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3739), 
     is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the costs of relocating oyster beds in the Davis Pond 
     project area.

     SEC. 3082. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET RELOCATION 
                   ASSISTANCE, LOUISIANA.

       (a) Port Facilities Relocation.--
       (1) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to the Assistant Secretary for Economic 
     Development (referred to in this section as the ``Assistant 
     Secretary'') $75,000,000, to remain available until expended, 
     to support the relocation of Port of New Orleans deep draft 
     facilities from the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet (referred 
     to in this section as the ``Outlet''), the Gulf Intracoastal 
     Waterway, and the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to the 
     Mississippi River.
       (2) Administration.--
       (A) In general.--Amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph 
     (1) shall be administered by the Assistant Secretary pursuant 
     to sections 209(c)(2) and 703 of the Public Works and 
     Economic Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(c)(2), 
     3233).
       (B) Requirement.--The Assistant Secretary shall make 
     amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) available to 
     the Port of New Orleans to relocate to the Mississippi River 
     within the State of Louisiana the port-owned facilities that 
     are occupied by businesses in the vicinity that may be 
     impacted due to the treatment of the Outlet under title VII 
     of this Act.
       (b) Revolving Loan Fund Grants.--There is authorized to be 
     appropriated to the Assistant Secretary $85,000,000, to 
     remain available until expended, to provide assistance 
     pursuant to sections 209(c)(2) and 703 of the Public Works 
     and Economic Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(c)(2), 
     3233) to one or more eligible recipients under such Act to 
     establish revolving loan funds to make loans for terms up to 
     20 years at or below market interest rates (including 
     interest-free loans) to private businesses within the Port of 
     New Orleans that may need to relocate to the Mississippi 
     River within the State of Louisiana due to the treatment of 
     the Outlet under title VII of this Act.
       (c) Requirements.--In selecting one or more recipients 
     under subsection (b), the Assistant Secretary shall ensure 
     that each recipient has established procedures to target 
     lending to businesses that will be directly and substantially 
     impacted by the treatment of the Mississippi River-Gulf 
     Outlet under title VII of this Act.
       (d) Coordination With Secretary.--The Assistant Secretary 
     shall ensure that the programs described in subsections (a) 
     and (b) are coordinated with the Secretary to ensure that 
     facilities are relocated in a manner that is consistent with 
     the analysis and design of comprehensive hurricane protection 
     authorized by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).
       (e) Administrative Expenses.--The Assistant Secretary may 
     use up to 2 percent of the amounts made available under 
     subsections (a) and (b) for administrative expenses.

     SEC. 3083. VIOLET, LOUISIANA.

       (a) Violet Diversion Project.--The Secretary shall design 
     and implement a project for a diversion of freshwater at or 
     near Violet, Louisiana, for the purposes of reducing salinity 
     in the western Mississippi Sound, enhancing oyster 
     production, and promoting the sustainability of coastal 
     wetlands.
       (b) Salinity Levels.--The project shall be designed to 
     meet, or maximize the ability to meet, the salinity levels 
     identified in the feasibility study of the Corps of Engineers 
     entitled ``Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas: 
     Freshwater Diversion to Lake Pontchartrain Basin and 
     Mississippi Sound'' and dated 1984.
       (c) Additional Measures.--
       (1) Recommendations.--If the Secretary determines that the 
     diversion of freshwater at or near Violet, Louisiana, will 
     not restore salinity levels to meet the requirements of 
     subsection (b), the Secretary shall recommend additional 
     measures for freshwater diversions sufficient to meet those 
     levels.
       (2) Implementation.--The Secretary shall implement measures 
     included in the recommendations developed under paragraph (1) 
     beginning 60 days after the date on which a report containing 
     the recommendations is provided to the Committee on 
     Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee 
     on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives.
       (d) Non-Federal Financing Requirements.--
       (1) Estimates.--Before October 1 of each fiscal year, the 
     Secretary shall notify the States of Louisiana and 
     Mississippi of each State's respective estimated costs for 
     that fiscal year for the activities authorized under this 
     section.
       (2) Escrow.--The States of Louisiana and Mississippi shall 
     provide the funds described in paragraph (1) by making a 
     deposit into an escrow account, or such other account, of the 
     Treasury as the Secretary determines to be acceptable within 
     30 days after the date of receipt of the notification from 
     the Secretary under paragraph (1).
       (3) Deposits by louisiana.--
       (A) Use of certain funds.--The State of Louisiana may use 
     funds available to the State under the coastal impact 
     assistance program authorized under section 31 of the Outer 
     Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1356a) in meeting its 
     cost-sharing responsibilities under this section.
       (B) Failure to provide funds.--
       (i) In general.--If the State of Louisiana does not provide 
     the funds under paragraph (2), the Secretary of the Interior, 
     using funds to be disbursed to the State under the program 
     referred to in subparagraph (A) or under the Gulf of Mexico 
     Energy Security Act of 2006 (title I of Division C of Public 
     Law 109-432; (43 U.S.C. 1331 note; 120 Stat. 3000)), shall 
     deposit such funds as are necessary to meet the requirements 
     for the State under paragraph (2).
       (ii) Deadline for deposit.--Any deposit required under 
     clause (i) shall be made prior to any other disbursements 
     made to the State of Louisiana under the programs referred to 
     in clause (i).
       (C) Exception.--The State of Louisiana shall not be 
     required to make a deposit of its share in any fiscal year in 
     which the State of Mississippi does not make its deposit 
     following a notification under paragraph (1) or the State of 
     Mississippi notifies the Secretary that it does not intend to 
     make a deposit in that fiscal year.
       (4) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project for the costs of design work carried out by the non-
     Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.
       (5) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
     project authorized by subsection (a) shall be 75 percent.
       (e) Schedule.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to the availability of 
     appropriations, the Secretary shall complete the design of 
     the project not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act and shall complete the construction of 
     the project by not later than September 30, 2012.
       (2) Missed deadline.--If the Secretary does not complete 
     the design or construction of the project in accordance with 
     paragraph (1), the Secretary shall complete the design or 
     construction as expeditiously as possible.

     SEC. 3084. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY 
                   CANAL), LOUISIANA.

       Section 328 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 304-305) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) by striking ``operation and maintenance'' and inserting 
     ``operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, repair, and 
     replacement''; and
       (B) by striking ``Algiers Channel'' and inserting ``Algiers 
     Canal Levees''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     the project shall be 35 percent.''.

     SEC. 3085. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE.

       The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
     for the project being carried out under section 111 of the 
     River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) for the 
     mitigation of shore damages attributable to the project for 
     navigation, Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine, shall be $26,900,000.

     SEC. 3086. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND.

       Section 580(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 375) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$25,750,000'';
       (2) by striking ``$9,750,000'' and inserting 
     ``$16,738,000''; and
       (3) by striking ``$5,250,000'' and inserting 
     ``$9,012,000''.

     SEC. 3087. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND.

       The project for navigation and environmental restoration 
     through the beneficial use of dredged material, Poplar 
     Island, Maryland, authorized by section 537 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3776) and 
     modified by section 318 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2604), is

[[Page 21779]]

     modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
     expansion of the project in accordance with the report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 2006, at an additional 
     total cost of $260,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $195,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $65,000,000.

     SEC. 3088. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN.

       (a) In General.--The project for emergency streambank and 
     shoreline protection, Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, 
     Michigan, being carried out under section 14 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), is modified to include 
     measures to enhance public access.
       (b) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall be 
     $3,000,000.

     SEC. 3089. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

       Section 426 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 326) is amended to read as follows:

     ``SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

       ``(a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       ``(1) Management plan.--The term `management plan' means 
     the management plan for the St. Clair River and Lake St. 
     Clair, Michigan, that is in effect as of the date of 
     enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
       ``(2) Partnership.--The term `Partnership' means the 
     partnership established by the Secretary under subsection 
     (b)(1).
       ``(b) Partnership.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish and lead a 
     partnership of appropriate Federal agencies (including the 
     Environmental Protection Agency) and the State of Michigan 
     (including political subdivisions of the State)--
       ``(A) to promote cooperation among the Federal Government, 
     State and local governments, and other involved parties in 
     the management of the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
     watersheds; and
       ``(B) to develop and implement projects consistent with the 
     management plan.
       ``(2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
       ``(A) In general.--Actions taken under this section by the 
     Partnership shall be coordinated with actions to restore and 
     conserve the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair and 
     watersheds taken under other provisions of Federal and State 
     law.
       ``(B) No effect on other law.--Nothing in this section 
     alters, modifies, or affects any other provision of Federal 
     or State law.
       ``(c) Implementation of St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
     Management Plan.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
       ``(A) develop a St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
     strategic implementation plan in accordance with the 
     management plan;
       ``(B) provide technical, planning, and engineering 
     assistance to non-Federal interests for developing and 
     implementing activities consistent with the management plan;
       ``(C) plan, design, and implement projects consistent with 
     the management plan; and
       ``(D) provide, in coordination with the Administrator of 
     the Environmental Protection Agency, financial and technical 
     assistance, including grants, to the State of Michigan 
     (including political subdivisions of the State) and 
     interested nonprofit entities for the Federal share of the 
     cost of planning, design, and implementation of projects to 
     restore, conserve, manage, and sustain the St. Clair River, 
     Lake St. Clair, and associated watersheds.
       ``(2) Specific measures.--Financial and technical 
     assistance provided under subparagraphs (B) and (C) of 
     paragraph (1) may be used in support of non-Federal 
     activities consistent with the management plan.
       ``(d) Supplements to Management Plan and Strategic 
     Implementation Plan.--In consultation with the Partnership 
     and after providing an opportunity for public review and 
     comment, the Secretary shall develop information to 
     supplement--
       ``(1) the management plan; and
       ``(2) the strategic implementation plan developed under 
     subsection (c)(1)(A).
       ``(e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.''.

     SEC. 3090. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

       The Secretary shall expedite development of the dredged 
     material management plan for the project for navigation, St. 
     Joseph Harbor, Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the 
     River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 299).

     SEC. 3091. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN.

       (a) In General.--The text of section 1149 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) is amended 
     to read as follows:
       ``The Secretary shall construct, at Federal expense, a 
     second lock, of a width not less than 110 feet and a length 
     not less than 1,200 feet, adjacent to the existing lock at 
     Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, generally in accordance with 
     the report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, 
     dated May 19, 1986, and the limited reevaluation report dated 
     February 2004 at a total cost of $341,714,000.''.
       (b) Conforming Repeals.--The following provisions are 
     repealed:
       (1) Section 107(a)(8) of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4620).
       (2) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3717).
       (3) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 305).

     SEC. 3092. ADA, MINNESOTA.

       In carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, 
     Wild Rice River, Ada, Minnesota, under section 205 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the Secretary 
     shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
     financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) 
     if the detailed project report evaluation indicates that 
     applying such section is necessary to implement the project.

     SEC. 3093. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, 
     McQuade Road, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 
     of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and 
     modified by section 321 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary to provide public access and recreational 
     facilities as generally described in the Detailed Project 
     Report and Environmental Assessment, McQuade Road Harbor of 
     Refuge, Duluth, Minnesota, dated August 1999.
       (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project for the costs of design work carried out by the non-
     Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.
       (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall be 
     $9,000,000.

     SEC. 3094. GRAND MARAIS, MINNESOTA.

       The project for navigation, Grand Marais, Minnesota, 
     carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) is modified to direct the Secretary to 
     credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
     carried out for the project before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3095. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

       The Secretary shall provide credit in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) 
     toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the navigation 
     project for Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota, carried out 
     under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
     U.S.C. 577), for the costs of design work carried out for the 
     project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project.

     SEC. 3096. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is directed to implement the 
     locally preferred plan for flood damage reduction, Granite 
     Falls, Minnesota, at a total cost of $12,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $8,000,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $4,000,000. In carrying out the project, the 
     Secretary shall utilize, to the extent practicable, the 
     existing detailed project report dated 2002 for the project 
     prepared under the authority of section 205 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
       (b) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the 
     project under this section, the Secretary shall allow the 
     non-Federal interests to participate in the financing of the 
     project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the 
     detailed project report evaluation indicates that applying 
     such section is necessary to implement the project.
       (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the project the 
     cost of design and construction work carried out by the non-
     Federal interest for the project before the date of execution 
     of a partnership agreement for the project.
       (d) Maximum Funding.--The maximum amount of Federal funds 
     that may be expended for the flood damage reduction shall be 
     $8,000,000.

     SEC. 3097. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

       The project for navigation, Harbor at Knife River, 
     Minnesota, authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors 
     Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary to develop a final design and prepare plans and 
     specifications to correct the harbor entrance and mooring 
     conditions at the project.

     SEC. 3098. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

       The project for flood control, Red Lake River, Crookston, 
     Minnesota, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is 
     modified to include flood protection for the adjacent and 
     interconnected areas generally known as the Sampson and 
     Chase/Loring neighborhoods, in accordance with the 
     feasibility report supplement for local flood protection, 
     Crookston, Minnesota, at a total cost of $25,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $16,250,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $8,750,000.

     SEC. 3099. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA.

       The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, 
     authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 
     March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), is modified to include operation 
     and maintenance of the general navigation facilities as a 
     Federal responsibility.

     SEC. 3100. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

       The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Minnesota, 
     carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to include operation and 
     maintenance of the general navigation facilities as a Federal 
     responsibility.

[[Page 21780]]



     SEC. 3101. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the requirements of 
     section 107(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
     577(a)), the project for navigation, Two Harbors, Minnesota, 
     being carried out under such authority, is justified on the 
     basis of navigation safety.
       (b) Maximum Federal Expenditures.--The maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall be 
     $7,000,000.

     SEC. 3102. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

       The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, 
     Harrison County, Mississippi, being carried out under section 
     204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 
     2326), is modified to authorize the non-Federal interest to 
     provide, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), any portion of the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the project in the form of in-
     kind services and materials.

     SEC. 3103. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

       (a) Modification.--Section 331 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305) is amended by 
     striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting ``$9,000,000''.
       (b) Applicability of Credit.--The credit provided by 
     section 331 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 305) (as amended by subsection (a) of this 
     section) shall apply to costs incurred by the Jackson County 
     Board of Supervisors during the period beginning on February 
     8, 1994, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act for 
     projects authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 
     3757; 113 Stat. 1494).

     SEC. 3104. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
     Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, Mississippi, authorized 
     by section 401(e)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1986 (100 Stat. 4132), is modified to authorize the 
     Secretary, subject to subsection (c), to construct the 
     project generally in accordance with the plan described in 
     the ``Pearl River Watershed, Mississippi, Feasibility Study 
     Main Report, Preliminary Draft'', dated February 2007, at a 
     total cost of $205,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $133,770,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $72,030,000.
       (b) Comparison of Alternatives.--Before initiating 
     construction of the project, the Secretary shall compare the 
     level of flood damage reduction provided by the plan that 
     maximizes national economic development benefits of the 
     project and the locally preferred plan, referred to as the 
     LeFleur Lakes plan, to that portion of Jackson, Mississippi 
     and vicinity, located below the Ross Barnett Reservoir Dam.
       (c) Implementation of Plan.--
       (1) In general.--If the Secretary determines under 
     subsection (b) that the locally preferred plan provides a 
     level of flood damage reduction that is equal to or greater 
     than the level of flood damage reduction provided by the 
     national economic development plan and that the locally 
     preferred plan is environmentally acceptable and technically 
     feasible, the Secretary may construct the project identified 
     as the national economic development plan, or the locally 
     preferred plan, or some combination thereof.
       (2) Construction by non-federal interests.--The non-Federal 
     interest may carry out the project under section 211 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
       (d) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the 
     project under this section, the Secretary shall allow the 
     non-Federal interests to participate in the financing of the 
     project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the 
     detailed project report evaluation indicates that applying 
     such section is necessary to implement the project.
       (e) Non-Federal Cost Share.--If the locally preferred plan 
     is selected for construction of the project, the Federal 
     share of the cost of the project shall be limited to the 
     share as provided by law for the elements of the national 
     economic development plan.

     SEC. 3105. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI.

       Section 102(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 282) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' 
     and inserting ``$13,000,000''.

     SEC. 3106. L-15 LEVEE, MISSOURI.

       The portion of the L-15 levee system that is under the 
     jurisdiction of the Consolidated North County Levee District 
     and situated along the right descending bank of the 
     Mississippi River from the confluence of that river with the 
     Missouri River and running upstream approximately 14 miles 
     shall be considered to be a Federal levee for purposes of 
     cost sharing under section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 
     (33 U.S.C. 701n).

     SEC. 3107. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI.

       The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch-
     Chesterfield, Missouri, authorized by section 101(b)(18) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), 
     is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of the planning, design, and construction 
     work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3108. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI.

       The projects for flood control, River Des Peres, Missouri, 
     authorized by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and section 102(13) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
     3668), are each modified to direct the Secretary to credit, 
     in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of 
     the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the 
     non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3109. LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT, MONTANA.

       The Secretary may use funds appropriated to carry out the 
     Missouri River recovery and mitigation program to assist the 
     Bureau of Reclamation in the design and construction of the 
     Lower Yellowstone project of the Bureau, Intake, Montana, for 
     the purpose of ecosystem restoration.

     SEC. 3110. YELLOWSTONE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MONTANA AND 
                   NORTH DAKOTA.

       (a) Definition of Restoration Project.--In this section, 
     the term ``restoration project'' means a project that will 
     produce, in accordance with other Federal programs, projects, 
     and activities, substantial ecosystem restoration and related 
     benefits, as determined by the Secretary.
       (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out, in accordance 
     with other Federal programs, projects, and activities, 
     restoration projects in the watershed of the Yellowstone 
     River and tributaries in Montana, and in North Dakota, to 
     produce immediate and substantial ecosystem restoration and 
     recreation benefits.
       (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), 
     the Secretary shall--
       (1) consult with, and consider the activities being carried 
     out by--
       (A) other Federal agencies;
       (B) Indian tribes;
       (C) conservation districts; and
       (D) the Yellowstone River Conservation District Council; 
     and
       (2) seek the participation of the State of Montana.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.

     SEC. 3111. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA.

       The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, 
     Lincoln, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(19) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is 
     modified--
       (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of design and construction work carried out 
     by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
     of the partnership agreement for the project; and
       (2) to allow the non-Federal interest for the project to 
     use, and to direct the Secretary to accept, funds provided 
     under any other Federal program to satisfy, in whole or in 
     part, the non-Federal share of the project if the Federal 
     agency that provides such funds determines that the funds are 
     authorized to be used to carry out the project.

     SEC. 3112. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA.

       The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage 
     reduction, Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, authorized 
     by section 101(b)(20) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified--
       (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project or reimbursement for the costs of any work performed 
     by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
     approval of the project partnership agreement, including work 
     performed by the non-Federal interest in connection with the 
     design and construction of 7 upstream detention storage 
     structures;
       (2) to require that in-kind work to be credited under 
     paragraph (1) be subject to audit; and
       (3) to direct the Secretary to accept advance funds from 
     the non-Federal interest as needed to maintain the project 
     schedule.

     SEC. 3113. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA.

       The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage 
     reduction, Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska, 
     authorized by section 101(b)(21) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified to 
     authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total 
     cost of $21,664,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $14,082,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,582,000.

     SEC. 3114. LOWER TRUCKEE RIVER, MCCARRAN RANCH, NEVADA.

       The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
     for the project being carried out, as of the date of 
     enactment of this Act, under section 1135 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) for 
     environmental restoration of McCarran Ranch, Nevada, shall be 
     $5,775,000.

     SEC. 3115. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NEW 
                   JERSEY.

       The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem 
     restoration, shore protection, and hurricane and storm damage 
     reduction, Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New 
     Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is 
     modified to incorporate the project for shoreline erosion 
     control, Cape May Point, New Jersey, carried out under 
     section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
     participation in the cost of protecting the shores of 
     publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33

[[Page 21781]]

     U.S.C. 426h), if the Secretary determines that such 
     incorporation is feasible.

     SEC. 3116. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NEW JERSEY.

       The project for flood control, Passaic River, New Jersey 
     and New York, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and 
     modified by section 327 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2607), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary to include the benefits and costs of preserving 
     natural flood storage in any future economic analysis of the 
     project.

     SEC. 3117. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, NEW MEXICO.

       The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with 
     any Indian tribe any land of which is located in the State of 
     New Mexico and occupied by a flood control project that is 
     owned and operated by the Corps of Engineers to assist in 
     carrying out any operation or maintenance activity associated 
     with the flood control project.

     SEC. 3118. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NEW MEXICO.

       (a) Restoration Projects Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``restoration project'' means a project that will 
     produce, consistent with other Federal programs, projects, 
     and activities, immediate and substantial ecosystem 
     restoration and recreation benefits.
       (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary shall select and 
     shall carry out restoration projects in the Middle Rio Grande 
     from Cochiti Dam to the headwaters of Elephant Butte 
     Reservoir in the State of New Mexico.
       (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), 
     the Secretary shall consult with, and consider the activities 
     being carried out by--
       (1) the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act 
     Collaborative Program; and
       (2) the Bosque Improvement Group of the Middle Rio Grande 
     Bosque Initiative.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 3119. BUFFALO HARBOR, NEW YORK.

       The project for navigation, Buffalo Harbor, New York, 
     authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 
     (76 Stat. 1176), is modified to include measures to enhance 
     public access, at Federal cost of $500,000.

     SEC. 3120. LONG ISLAND SOUND OYSTER RESTORATION, NEW YORK AND 
                   CONNECTICUT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall plan, design, and 
     construct projects to increase aquatic habitats within Long 
     Island Sound and adjacent waters, including the construction 
     and restoration of oyster beds and related shellfish habitat.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     activities carried out under this section shall be 25 percent 
     and may be provided through in-kind services and materials.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 3121. MAMARONECK AND SHELDRAKE RIVERS WATERSHED 
                   MANAGEMENT, NEW YORK.

       (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     State of New York and local entities, shall develop watershed 
     management plans for the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake River 
     watershed for the purposes of evaluating existing and new 
     flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration.
       (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed management 
     plans, the Secretary shall use existing studies and plans, as 
     appropriate.
       (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any 
     eligible critical restoration project in the Mamaroneck and 
     Sheldrake Rivers watershed in accordance with the watershed 
     management plans developed under subsection (a).
       (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project 
     shall be eligible for assistance under this section if the 
     project--
       (A) meets the purposes described in the watershed 
     management plans developed under subsection (a); and
       (B) with respect to the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers 
     watershed in New York, consists of flood damage reduction or 
     ecosystem restoration through--
       (i) bank stabilization of the mainstem, tributaries, and 
     streams;
       (ii) wetland restoration;
       (iii) soil and water conservation;
       (iv) restoration of natural flows;
       (v) restoration of stream stability;
       (vi) structural and nonstructural flood damage reduction 
     measures; or
       (vii) any other project or activity the Secretary 
     determines to be appropriate.
       (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, 
     the Secretary may enter into one or more cooperative 
     agreements to provide financial assistance to appropriate 
     Federal, State, or local governments or nonprofit agencies, 
     including assistance for the implementation of projects to be 
     carried out under subsection (b).
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to 
     remain available until expended.

     SEC. 3122. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.

       Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``maximum Federal 
     cost of $5,200,000'' and inserting ``total cost of 
     $20,000,000''.

     SEC. 3123. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK AND NEW 
                   JERSEY.

       The navigation project, Port of New York and New Jersey, 
     New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(2) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), 
     is modified--
       (1) to authorize the Secretary to allow the non-Federal 
     interest to construct a temporary dredged material storage 
     facility to receive dredged material from the project if--
       (A) the non-Federal interest submits, in writing, a list of 
     potential sites for the temporary storage facility to the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
     of Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate, and the Secretary at least 180 days 
     before the selection of the final site; and
       (B) at least 70 percent of the dredged material generated 
     in connection with the project suitable for beneficial reuse 
     will be used at sites in the State of New Jersey to the 
     extent that there are sufficient sites available; and
       (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of construction of the temporary storage 
     facility for the project.

     SEC. 3124. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

       Section 553(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3781) is amended to read as follows:
       ``(c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this 
     section, the term `New York State Canal System' means the 524 
     miles of navigable canal that comprise the New York State 
     Canal System, including the Erie, Cayuga-Seneca, Oswego, and 
     Champlain Canals and the historic alignments of these canals, 
     including the cities of Albany, Rochester, and Buffalo.''.

     SEC. 3125. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER DELAWARE RIVER 
                   WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, NEW YORK.

       (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     State of New York, the Delaware or Susquehanna River Basin 
     Commission, as appropriate, and local entities, shall develop 
     watershed management plans for the Susquehanna River 
     watershed in New York State and the Upper Delaware River 
     watershed for the purposes of evaluating existing and new 
     flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration.
       (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed management 
     plans, the Secretary shall use existing studies and plans, as 
     appropriate.
       (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any 
     eligible critical restoration project in the Susquehanna 
     River or Upper Delaware Rivers in accordance with the 
     watershed management plans developed under subsection (a).
       (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project 
     shall be eligible for assistance under this section if the 
     project--
       (A) meets the purposes described in the watershed 
     management plans developed under subsection (a); and
       (B) with respect to the Susquehanna River or Upper Delaware 
     River watershed in New York, consists of flood damage 
     reduction or ecosystem restoration through--
       (i) bank stabilization of the mainstem, tributaries, and 
     streams;
       (ii) wetland restoration;
       (iii) soil and water conservation;
       (iv) restoration of natural flows;
       (v) restoration of stream stability;
       (vi) structural and nonstructural flood damage reduction 
     measures; or
       (vii) any other project or activity the Secretary 
     determines to be appropriate.
       (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, 
     the Secretary may enter into 1 or more cooperative agreements 
     to provide financial assistance to appropriate Federal, 
     State, or local governments or nonprofit agencies, including 
     assistance for the implementation of projects to be carried 
     out under subsection (b).
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to 
     remain available until expended.

     SEC. 3126. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, NORTH DAKOTA.

       Section 707(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     2000 (114 Stat. 2699) is amended in the first sentence by 
     striking ``$5,000,000'' and all that follows through ``2005'' 
     and inserting ``$25,000,000''.

     SEC. 3127. WAHPETON, NORTH DAKOTA.

       The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be allotted 
     for the project for flood damage reduction, Wahpeton, North 
     Dakota, being carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), shall be $12,000,000.

     SEC. 3128. OHIO.

       Section 594 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 381) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
     (g) and (h), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
       ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-
     Federal interest for any project carried out under this 
     section may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of 
     the affected local government.''.

     SEC. 3129. LOWER GIRARD LAKE DAM, GIRARD, OHIO.

       Section 507 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3758) is amended--

[[Page 21782]]

       (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
     Secretary'';
       (2) in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) (as designated by 
     paragraph (1) of this subsection)--
       (A) by striking ``Repair and rehabilitation'' and all that 
     follows through ``Ohio'' and inserting ``Correction of 
     structural deficiencies of the Lower Girard Lake Dam, Girard, 
     Ohio, and the appurtenant features to meet the dam safety 
     standards of the State of Ohio''; and
       (B) by striking ``$2,500,000'' and inserting 
     ``$16,000,000''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(b) Special Rules.--The project for Lower Girard Lake 
     Dam, Girard, Ohio, authorized by subsection (a)(1) is 
     justified on the basis of public safety.''.

     SEC. 3130. MAHONING RIVER, OHIO.

       In carrying out the project for environmental dredging, 
     authorized by section 312(f)(4) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 1272(f)(4)), the Secretary 
     is directed to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
     non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3131. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

       Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, to the 
     Secretary in October 1999 of all costs associated with 
     present and future water storage costs at Arcadia Lake, 
     Oklahoma, under Arcadia Lake Water Storage Contract Number 
     DACW56-79-C-0072 shall satisfy the obligations of the city 
     under that contract.

     SEC. 3132. ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OKLAHOMA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to participate 
     in the ecosystem restoration, recreation, and flood damage 
     reduction components of the Arkansas River Corridor Master 
     Plan dated October 2005. The Secretary shall coordinate with 
     appropriate representatives in the vicinity of Tulsa, 
     Oklahoma, including representatives of Tulsa County and 
     surrounding communities and the Indian Nations Council of 
     Governments.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 3133. LAKE EUFAULA, OKLAHOMA.

       (a) Project Goal.--
       (1) In general.--The goal for operation of Lake Eufaula, 
     Oklahoma, shall be to maximize the use of available storage 
     in a balanced approach that incorporates advice from 
     representatives from all the project purposes to ensure that 
     the full value of the reservoir is realized by the United 
     States.
       (2) Recognition of purpose.--To achieve the goal described 
     in paragraph (1), recreation is recognized as a project 
     purpose at Lake Eufaula, pursuant to section 4 of the Flood 
     Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 889).
       (b) Lake Eufaula Advisory Committee.--
       (1) In general.--In accordance with the Federal Advisory 
     Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), the Secretary shall establish 
     an advisory committee for the Lake Eufaula, Canadian River, 
     Oklahoma project authorized by the first section of the River 
     and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 635).
       (2) Purpose.--The purpose of the committee shall be 
     advisory only.
       (3) Duties.--The committee shall provide information and 
     recommendations to the Corps of Engineers regarding the 
     operations of Lake Eufaula for the project purposes for Lake 
     Eufaula.
       (4) Composition.--The Committee shall be composed of 
     members that equally represent the project purposes for Lake 
     Eufaula.
       (c) Reallocation Study.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to the appropriation of funds, the 
     Secretary shall perform a reallocation study, at Federal 
     expense, to develop and present recommendations concerning 
     the best value, while minimizing ecological damages, for 
     current and future use of the Lake Eufaula storage capacity 
     for the authorized project purposes of flood control, water 
     supply, hydroelectric power, navigation, fish and wildlife, 
     and recreation.
       (2) Factors for consideration.--The reallocation study 
     shall take into consideration the recommendations of the Lake 
     Eufaula Advisory Committee.
       (d) Pool Management Plan.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, to the extent feasible within 
     available project funds and subject to the completion and 
     approval of the reallocation study under subsection (c), the 
     Tulsa district engineer, taking into consideration 
     recommendations of the Lake Eufaula Advisory Committee, shall 
     develop an interim management plan that accommodates all 
     project purposes for Lake Eufaula.
       (2) Modifications.--A modification of the plan under 
     paragraph (1) shall not cause significant adverse impacts on 
     any existing permit, lease, license, contract, public law, or 
     project purpose, including flood control operation, relating 
     to Lake Eufaula.

     SEC. 3134. OKLAHOMA LAKES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, OKLAHOMA.

       (a) Implementation of Program.--Not later than one year 
     after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
     implement an innovative program at the lakes located 
     primarily in the State of Oklahoma that are a part of an 
     authorized civil works project under the administrative 
     jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers for the purpose of 
     demonstrating the benefits of enhanced recreation facilities 
     and activities at those lakes.
       (b) Requirements.--In implementing the program under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary, consistent with authorized 
     project purposes, shall--
       (1) pursue strategies that will enhance, to the maximum 
     extent practicable, recreation experiences at the lakes 
     included in the program;
       (2) use creative management strategies that optimize 
     recreational activities; and
       (3) ensure continued public access to recreation areas 
     located on or associated with the civil works project.
       (c) Guidelines.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidelines 
     for the implementation of this section, to be developed in 
     coordination with the State of Oklahoma.
       (d) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives a report describing the results of 
     the program under subsection (a).
       (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
     include a description of the projects undertaken under the 
     program, including--
       (A) an estimate of the change in any related recreational 
     opportunities;
       (B) a description of any leases entered into, including the 
     parties involved; and
       (C) the financial conditions that the Corps of Engineers 
     used to justify those leases.
       (3) Availability to public.--The Secretary shall make the 
     report available to the public in electronic and written 
     formats.
       (e) Termination.--The authority provided by this section 
     shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date 
     of enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 3135. OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.

       (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
     $30,000,000 for the purposes set forth in subsection (b).
       (b) Purposes.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
     funds appropriated under subsection (a) may be used for the 
     purpose of--
       (1) the buyout of properties and permanently relocating 
     residents and businesses in or near Picher, Cardin, and 
     Hockerville, Oklahoma, from areas determined by the State of 
     Oklahoma to be at risk of damage caused by land subsidence 
     and remaining properties; and
       (2) providing funding to the State of Oklahoma to buyout 
     properties and permanently relocate residents and businesses 
     of Picher, Cardin, and Hockerville, Oklahoma, from areas 
     determined by the State of Oklahoma to be at risk of damage 
     caused by land subsidence and remaining properties.
       (c) Limitation.--The use of funds in accordance with 
     subsection (b) shall not be considered to be part of a 
     federally assisted program or project for purposes of Public 
     Law 91-646 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), consistent with section 
     2301 of Public Law 109-234 (120 Stat. 455).
       (d) Consistency With State Program.--Any actions taken 
     under subsection (b) shall be consistent with the relocation 
     program in the State of Oklahoma under 27A O.S. Supp. 2006, 
     sections 2201 et seq.
       (e) Consideration of Remedial Action.--The Administrator of 
     the Environmental Protection Agency shall consider, without 
     delay, a remedial action under the Comprehensive 
     Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 
     1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) for the Tar Creek, Oklahoma, 
     National Priorities List site that includes permanent 
     relocation of residents consistent with the program currently 
     being administered by the State of Oklahoma. Such relocation 
     shall not be subject to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and 
     Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     4601 et seq.).
       (f) Estimating Costs.--In estimating and comparing the cost 
     of a remedial alternative for the Tar Creek Oklahoma, 
     National Priorities List site that includes the permanent 
     relocation of residents, the Administrator shall not include 
     the cost of compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance 
     and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     4601 et seq.).
       (g) Effect of Certain Remedies.--Inclusion of subsidence 
     remedies, such as permanent relocation within any remedial 
     action, shall not preempt, alter, or delay the right of any 
     sovereign entity, including any State or tribal government, 
     to seek remedies, including abatement, for land subsidence 
     and subsidence risks under State law.
       (h) Amendment.--Section 111 of Public Law 108-137 (117 
     Stat. 1835) is amended--
       (1) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following: 
     ``Such activities also may include the provision of financial 
     assistance to facilitate the buy out of properties located in 
     areas identified by the State as areas that are or will be at 
     risk of damage caused by land subsidence and associated 
     properties otherwise identified by the State. Any buyout of 
     such properties shall not be considered to be part of a 
     federally assisted program or project for purposes of Public 
     Law 91-646 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), consistent with section 
     2301 of Public Law 109-234 (120 Stat. 455-456).''; and
       (2) by striking the first sentence of subsection (d) and 
     inserting the following: ``Non-Federal interests shall be 
     responsible for operating and maintaining any restoration 
     alternatives constructed or carried out pursuant to this 
     section.''.

     SEC. 3136. RED RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL, OKLAHOMA AND TEXAS.

       The project for water quality control in the Arkansas and 
     Red River Basin, Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas, authorized by 
     section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420) 
     and

[[Page 21783]]

     modified by section 1107(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development A of 1986 (100 Stat. 4229) is further modified to 
     direct the Secretary to provide operation and maintenance for 
     the Red River Chloride Control project, Oklahoma and Texas, 
     at Federal expense.

     SEC. 3137. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

       The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project Master 
     Conservancy District payable to the United States Government 
     in the amounts, rates of interest, and payment schedules--
       (1) is set at the amounts, rates of interest, and payment 
     schedules that existed on June 3, 1986, with respect to the 
     project for Waurika Lake, Oklahoma; and
       (2) may not be adjusted, altered, or changed without a 
     specific, separate, and written agreement between the 
     District and the United States.

     SEC. 3138. UPPER WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED ECOSYSTEM 
                   RESTORATION, OREGON.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct studies and 
     ecosystem restoration projects for the upper Willamette River 
     watershed from Albany, Oregon, to the headwaters of the 
     Willamette River and tributaries.
       (b) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out ecosystem 
     restoration projects under this section for the Upper 
     Willamette River watershed in consultation with the Governor 
     of the State of Oregon, the heads of appropriate Indian 
     tribes, the Environmental Protection Agency, the United 
     States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine 
     Fisheries Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the Forest 
     Service, and local entities.
       (c) Authorized Activities.--In carrying out ecosystem 
     restoration projects under this section, the Secretary shall 
     undertake activities necessary to protect, monitor, and 
     restore fish and wildlife habitat.
       (d) Priority.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
     shall give priority to a project to restore the millrace in 
     Eugene, Oregon, and shall include noneconomic benefits 
     associated with the historical significance of the millrace 
     and associated with preservation and enhancement of resources 
     in evaluating the benefits of the project.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

     SEC. 3139. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA, NEW JERSEY, AND 
                   DELAWARE.

       The Secretary may remove debris from the project for 
     navigation, Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and 
     Delaware, Philadelphia to the Sea.

     SEC. 3140. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Secretary may take such action as may be necessary, 
     including construction of a breakwater, to prevent shoreline 
     erosion between .07 and 2.7 miles south of Pennsylvania State 
     Route 994 on the east shore of Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 3141. SHERADEN PARK STREAM AND CHARTIERS CREEK, 
                   ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sheraden 
     Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
     Pennsylvania, being carried out under section 206 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), up to $400,000 toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project for planning and design work carried out 
     by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
     of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3142. SOLOMON'S CREEK, WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, 
     Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is 
     modified to include as a project element the project for 
     flood control for Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, 
     Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 3143. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (106 Stat. 4845; 109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 
     310; 117 Stat. 142) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (g)(1) by striking ``$180,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$200,000,000''; and
       (2) in subsection (h)(2) by striking ``Allegheny, 
     Armstrong, Beford, Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, 
     Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, 
     Mifflin, Somerset, Snyder, Washington, and Westmoreland 
     Counties'' and inserting ``Allegheny, Armstrong, Bedford, 
     Blair, Cambria, Fayette, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, 
     Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Somerset, Washington, and 
     Westmoreland Counties''.

     SEC. 3144. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.

       In carrying out the project for flood control, Wyoming 
     Valley, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), the 
     Secretary shall coordinate with non-Federal interests to 
     review opportunities for increased public access.

     SEC. 3145. NARRAGANSETT BAY, RHODE ISLAND.

       The Secretary may use amounts in the Environmental 
     Restoration Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, under 
     section 2703(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, for the 
     removal of abandoned marine camels at any formerly used 
     defense site under the jurisdiction of the Department of 
     Defense that is undergoing (or is scheduled to undergo) 
     environmental remediation under chapter 160 of title 10, 
     United States Code (and other provisions of law), in 
     Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, in accordance with the Corps 
     of Engineers prioritization process under the Formerly Used 
     Defense Sites program.

     SEC. 3146. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.

       (a) Membership.--Section 904(b)(1)(B) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2708) is 
     amended--
       (1) in clause (vii) by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (2) by redesignating clause (viii) as clause (ix); and
       (3) by inserting after clause (vii) the following:
       ``(viii) rural water systems; and''.
       (b) Reauthorization.--Section 907(a) of such Act (114 Stat. 
     2712) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``2005'' 
     and inserting ``2010''.

     SEC. 3147. CEDAR BAYOU, TEXAS.

       (a) Credit for Planning and Design.--The project for 
     navigation, Cedar Bayou, Texas, reauthorized by section 
     349(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
     Stat. 2632), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, 
     in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of 
     the cost of the project the cost of planning and design work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for construction and 
     operation and maintenance of the project shall be determined 
     in accordance with section 101 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).
       (c) Project for Navigation.--Section 349(a)(2) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2632) is amended 
     by striking ``12 feet deep by 125 feet wide'' and inserting 
     ``that is 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide''.

     SEC. 3148. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Freeport 
     Harbor, Texas, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
     Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818), is modified to provide 
     that--
       (1) all project costs incurred as a result of the discovery 
     of the sunken vessel COMSTOCK of the Corps of Engineers are a 
     Federal responsibility; and
       (2) the Secretary shall not seek further obligation or 
     responsibility for removal of the vessel COMSTOCK, or costs 
     associated with a delay due to the discovery of the sunken 
     vessel COMSTOCK, from the Port of Freeport.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--This section does not affect the 
     authorized cost sharing for the balance of the project 
     described in subsection (a).

     SEC. 3149. LAKE KEMP, TEXAS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may not take any legal or 
     administrative action seeking to remove a Lake Kemp 
     improvement before the earlier of January 1, 2020, or the 
     date of any transfer of ownership of the improvement 
     occurring after the date of enactment of this Act.
       (b) Limitation on Liability.--The United States, or any of 
     its officers, agents, or assignees, shall not be liable for 
     any injury, loss, or damage accruing to the owners of a Lake 
     Kemp improvement, their lessees, or occupants as a result of 
     any flooding or inundation of such improvements by the waters 
     of the Lake Kemp reservoir, or for such injury, loss, or 
     damage as may occur through the operation and maintenance of 
     the Lake Kemp dam and reservoir in any manner.
       (c) Lake Kemp Improvement Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``Lake Kemp improvement'' means an improvement 
     (including dwellings) located within the flowage easement of 
     Lake Kemp, Texas, below elevation 1159 feet mean sea level.

     SEC. 3150. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS.

       The project for flood control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, 
     Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4125), is modified--
       (1) to include as part of the project flood protection 
     works to reroute drainage to Raymondville Drain constructed 
     by the non-Federal interests in Hidalgo County in the 
     vicinity of Edinburg, Texas, if the Secretary determines that 
     such work is feasible;
       (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of planning, design, and construction work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project; 
     and
       (3) to direct the Secretary in calculating the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of the project, to make a determination, 
     within 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
     under section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) on the non-Federal interest's 
     ability to pay.

     SEC. 3151. NORTH PADRE ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TEXAS.

       The project for ecosystem restoration and storm damage 
     reduction, North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, 
     authorized by section 556 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 353), is modified to include 
     recreation as a project purpose.

     SEC. 3152. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TEXAS.

       The Secretary is directed to accept from the city of Paris, 
     Texas, $3,461,432 as payment in full of monies owed to the 
     United States for water supply storage space in Pat Mayse 
     Lake, Texas, under contract number DA-34-066-CIVENG-65-1272, 
     including accrued interest.

     SEC. 3153. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS.

       The Secretary is authorized to purchase fee simple title to 
     all properties located within the

[[Page 21784]]

     boundaries, and necessary for the operation, of the Proctor 
     Lake project, Texas, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1259).

     SEC. 3154. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

       The project for flood control, San Antonio Channel, Texas, 
     authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 
     (68 Stat. 1259) as part of the comprehensive plan for flood 
     protection on the Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers in Texas 
     and modified by section 103 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921) and section 335 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2611), 
     is modified to authorize the Secretary to credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of design and construction work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project.

     SEC. 3155. CONNECTICUT RIVER RESTORATION, VERMONT.

       Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), as in effect on August 5, 2005, 
     with respect to the study entitled ``Connecticut River 
     Restoration Authority'', dated May 23, 2001, a nonprofit 
     entity may act as the non-Federal interest for purposes of 
     carrying out the activities described in the agreement 
     executed between The Nature Conservancy and the Department of 
     the Army on August 5, 2005.

     SEC. 3156. DAM REMEDIATION, VERMONT.

       Section 543 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
     (114 Stat. 2673) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (2) in subsection (a)(3) by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting ``; and'';
       (3) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following:
       ``(4) may carry out measures to restore, protect, and 
     preserve an ecosystem affected by a dam described in 
     subsection (b).''; and
       (4) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following:
       ``(11) Camp Wapanacki, Hardwick.
       ``(12) Star Lake Dam, Mt. Holly.
       ``(13) Curtis Pond, Calais.
       ``(14) Weathersfield Reservoir, Springfield.
       ``(15) Burr Pond, Sudbury.
       ``(16) Maidstone Lake, Guildhall.
       ``(17) Upper and Lower Hurricane Dam.
       ``(18) Lake Fairlee.
       ``(19) West Charleston Dam.
       ``(20) White River, Sharon.''.

     SEC. 3157. LAKE CHAMPLAIN EURASIAN MILFOIL, WATER CHESTNUT, 
                   AND OTHER NONNATIVE PLANT CONTROL, VERMONT.

       Under authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor Act 
     of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary may revise the 
     existing General Design Memorandum to permit the use of 
     chemical means of control, when appropriate, of Eurasian 
     milfoil, water chestnuts, and other nonnative plants in the 
     Lake Champlain basin, Vermont.

     SEC. 3158. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION, 
                   VERMONT AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     States of Vermont and New Hampshire, shall carry out a study 
     and develop a strategy for the use of wetland restoration, 
     soil and water conservation practices, and nonstructural 
     measures to reduce flood damage, improve water quality, and 
     create wildlife habitat in the Upper Connecticut River 
     watershed.
       (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In conducting the study and 
     developing the strategy under this section, the Secretary may 
     enter into one or more cooperative agreements to provide 
     technical assistance to appropriate Federal, State, and local 
     agencies and nonprofit organizations with wetland restoration 
     experience. Such assistance may include assistance for the 
     implementation of wetland restoration projects and soil and 
     water conservation measures.
       (c) Implementation.--The Secretary shall carry out 
     development and implementation of the strategy under this 
     section in cooperation with local landowners and local 
     government officials.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000, to 
     remain available until expended.

     SEC. 3159. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ECOSYSTEM 
                   RESTORATION, VERMONT AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

       (a) General Management Plan Development.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     Secretary of Agriculture and in consultation with the States 
     of Vermont and New Hampshire and the Connecticut River Joint 
     Commission, shall conduct a study and develop a general 
     management plan for ecosystem restoration of the Upper 
     Connecticut River ecosystem for the purposes of--
       (A) habitat protection and restoration;
       (B) streambank stabilization;
       (C) restoration of stream stability;
       (D) water quality improvement;
       (E) aquatic nuisance species control;
       (F) wetland restoration;
       (G) fish passage; and
       (H) natural flow restoration.
       (2) Existing plans.--In developing the general management 
     plan, the Secretary shall depend heavily on existing plans 
     for the restoration of the Upper Connecticut River.
       (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any 
     critical restoration project in the Upper Connecticut River 
     basin in accordance with the general management plan 
     developed under subsection (a).
       (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project 
     shall be eligible for assistance under this section if the 
     project--
       (A) meets the purposes described in the general management 
     plan developed under subsection (a); and
       (B) with respect to the Upper Connecticut River and Upper 
     Connecticut River watershed, consists of--
       (i) bank stabilization of the main stem, tributaries, and 
     streams;
       (ii) wetland restoration and migratory bird habitat 
     restoration;
       (iii) soil and water conservation;
       (iv) restoration of natural flows;
       (v) restoration of stream stability;
       (vi) implementation of an intergovernmental agreement for 
     coordinating ecosystem restoration, fish passage 
     installation, streambank stabilization, wetland restoration, 
     habitat protection and restoration, or natural flow 
     restoration;
       (vii) water quality improvement;
       (viii) aquatic nuisance species control;
       (ix) improvements in fish migration; and
       (x) conduct of any other project or activity determined to 
     be appropriate by the Secretary.
       (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, 
     the Secretary may enter into one or more cooperative 
     agreements to provide financial assistance to appropriate 
     Federal, State, or local governments or nonprofit agencies. 
     Such assistance may include assistance for the implementation 
     of projects to be carried out under subsection (b).
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000. 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.

     SEC. 3160. LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.

       Section 542 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
     (114 Stat. 2671) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)(2)--
       (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (D);
       (B) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (G); 
     and
       (C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
       ``(E) river corridor assessment, protection, management, 
     and restoration for the purposes of ecosystem restoration;
       ``(F) geographic mapping conducted by the Secretary using 
     existing technical capacity to produce a high-resolution, 
     multispectral satellite imagery-based land use and cover data 
     set; or'';
       (2) in subsection (e)(2)(A)--
       (A) by striking ``The non-Federal'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(i) In general.--The non-Federal''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(ii) Approval of district engineer.--Approval of credit 
     for design work of less than $100,000 shall be determined by 
     the appropriate district engineer.'';
       (3) in subsection (e)(2)(C) by striking ``up to 50 percent 
     of''; and
       (4) in subsection (g) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$32,000,000''.

     SEC. 3161. SANDBRIDGE BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

       The project for beach erosion control and hurricane 
     protection, Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia, 
     authorized by section 101(22) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4804) and modified by 
     section 338 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
     (114 Stat. 2612), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
     review the project to determine whether any additional 
     Federal interest exists with respect to the project, taking 
     into consideration conditions and development levels relating 
     to the project in existence on the date of enactment of this 
     Act.

     SEC. 3162. TANGIER ISLAND SEAWALL, VIRGINIA.

       Section 577(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3789) is amended by striking ``at a total 
     cost of $1,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $300,000.'' and 
     inserting ``at a total cost of $3,600,000.''.

     SEC. 3163. DUWAMISH/GREEN, WASHINGTON.

       The project for ecosystem restoration, Duwamish/Green, 
     Washington, authorized by section 101(b)(26) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2579), is 
     modified--
       (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
     agreement for the project; and
       (2) to authorize the non-Federal interest to provide any 
     portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
     in the form of in-kind services and materials.

     SEC. 3164. MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, MCNARY NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
                   REFUGE, WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.

       (a) Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction.--
     Administrative jurisdiction over the land acquired for the 
     McNary Lock and Dam project and managed by the United States 
     Fish and Wildlife Service under cooperative agreement number 
     DACW68-4-00-13 with the Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla 
     District, is transferred from the Secretary to the Secretary 
     of the Interior.
       (b) Easements.--The transfer of administrative jurisdiction 
     under paragraph (1) shall be subject to easements in 
     existence as of the date

[[Page 21785]]

     of enactment of this Act on land subject to the transfer.
       (c) Rights of Secretary.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (C), 
     the Secretary shall retain rights described in subparagraph 
     (B) with respect to the land for which administrative 
     jurisdiction is transferred under paragraph (1).
       (2) Rights.--The rights of the Secretary referred to in 
     paragraph (1) are the rights--
       (A) to flood land described in subsection (a) to the 
     standard project flood elevation;
       (B) to manipulate the level of the McNary project pool;
       (C) to access land described in subsection (a) as may be 
     required to install, maintain, and inspect sediment ranges 
     and carry out similar activities;
       (D) to construct and develop wetland, riparian habitat, or 
     other environmental restoration features authorized by 
     section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 2309a) and section 206 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330);
       (E) to dredge and deposit fill materials; and
       (F) to carry out management actions for the purpose of 
     reducing the take of juvenile salmonids by avian colonies 
     that inhabit, before, on, or after the date of enactment of 
     this Act, any island included in the land described in 
     subsection (a).
       (3) Coordination.--Before exercising a right described in 
     any of subparagraphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (2), the 
     Secretary shall coordinate the exercise with the Director of 
     the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
       (d) Management.--
       (1) In general.--The land described in subsection (a) shall 
     be managed by the Secretary of the Interior as part of the 
     McNary National Wildlife Refuge.
       (2) Cummins property.--
       (A) Retention of credits.--Habitat unit credits described 
     in the memorandum entitled ``Design Memorandum No. 6, LOWER 
     SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, Wildlife 
     Compensation and Fishing Access Site Selection, Letter 
     Supplement No. 15, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE WALLULA 
     HMU'' provided for the Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife 
     Compensation Plan through development of the parcel of land 
     formerly known as the ``Cummins property'' shall be retained 
     by the Secretary despite any changes in management of the 
     parcel on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
       (B) Site development plan.--The Director shall obtain prior 
     approval of the Washington State department of fish and 
     wildlife for any change to the previously approved site 
     development plan for the parcel of land formerly known as the 
     ``Cummins property''.
       (3) Madame dorian recreation area.--The Director shall 
     continue operation of the Madame Dorian Recreation Area for 
     public use and boater access.
       (e) Administrative Costs.--The Director shall be 
     responsible for all survey, environmental compliance, and 
     other administrative costs required to implement the transfer 
     of administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a).

     SEC. 3165. SNAKE RIVER PROJECT, WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.

       (a) In General.--The fish and wildlife compensation plan 
     for the Lower Snake River, Washington and Idaho, as 
     authorized by section 102 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921), is amended to authorize the 
     Secretary to conduct studies and implement aquatic and 
     riparian ecosystem restorations and improvements specifically 
     for fisheries and wildlife.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 3166. YAKIMA RIVER, PORT OF SUNNYSIDE, WASHINGTON.

       The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Yakima 
     River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington, being carried out under 
     section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
     credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
     by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
     of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 3167. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4810, 110 Stat. 3726, 113 Stat. 312) is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(ff) Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.--
       ``(1) In general.--The project for flood control, Bluestone 
     Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia, authorized by section 
     4 of the Flood Control Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1217) is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to implement Plan C/G, as 
     defined in the Evaluation Report of the District Engineer 
     dated December 1996, to prohibit the release of drift and 
     debris into waters downstream of the project (other than 
     organic matter necessary to maintain and enhance the 
     biological resources of such waters and such nonobtrusive 
     items of debris as may not be economically feasible to 
     prevent being released through such project), including 
     measures to prevent the accumulation of drift and debris at 
     the project, the collection and removal of drift and debris 
     on the segment of the New River upstream of the project, and 
     the removal (through use of temporary or permanent systems) 
     and disposal of accumulated drift and debris at Bluestone 
     Dam.
       ``(2) Cooperative agreement.--In carrying out the 
     downstream cleanup under the plan referred to in paragraph 
     (1), the Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement 
     with the West Virginia department of environmental protection 
     for the department to carry out the cleanup, including 
     contracting and procurement services, contract administration 
     and management, transportation and disposal of collected 
     materials, and disposal fees.
       ``(3) Initial cleanup.--The Secretary may provide the West 
     Virginia department of environmental protection up to 
     $150,000 from funds previously appropriated for this purpose 
     for the Federal share of the costs of the initial cleanup 
     under the plan.''.

     SEC. 3168. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 312) is amended by striking 
     ``$47,000,000'' and inserting ``$99,000,000''.

     SEC. 3169. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 30(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1988 (102 Stat. 4030; 114 Stat. 2678) is amended to read as 
     follows:
       ``(d) Historic Structure.--The Secretary shall ensure the 
     preservation and restoration of the structure known as the 
     `Jenkins House' and the reconstruction of associated 
     buildings and landscape features of such structure located 
     within the Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp in accordance with the 
     standards of the Department of the Interior for the treatment 
     of historic properties. Amounts made available for 
     expenditure for the project authorized by section 301(a) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110) 
     shall be available for the purposes of this subsection.''.

     SEC. 3170. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

       The project for flood control at Milton, West Virginia, 
     authorized by section 580 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790) and modified by section 340 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2612), 
     is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
     project substantially in accordance with the draft report of 
     the Corps of Engineers dated May 2004, at an estimated total 
     cost of $57,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $42,825,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,275,000.

     SEC. 3171. MCDOWELL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.

       The McDowell County nonstructural component of the project 
     for flood control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and 
     Cumberland Rivers, West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, 
     authorized by section 202(a) of the Energy and Water 
     Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide 
     protection, throughout McDowell County, West Virginia, from 
     the reoccurrence of the greater of--
       (1) the April 1977 flood;
       (2) the July 2001 flood;
       (3) the May 2002 flood; or
       (4) the 100-year frequency event.

     SEC. 3172. PARKERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA.

       The Secretary is authorized to carry out the ecosystem 
     restoration, recreation, and flood control components of the 
     report of the Corps of Engineers, entitled ``Parkersburg/
     Vienna Riverfront Park Feasibility Study'', dated June 1998, 
     as amended by the limited reevaluation report of the Corps of 
     Engineers, dated March 2004, at a total cost of $12,000,000, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $6,000,000, and an 
     estimated non-Federal cost of $6,000,000.

     SEC. 3173. GREEN BAY HARBOR, GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN.

       The portion of the inner harbor of the Federal navigation 
     channel of the Green Bay Harbor project, authorized by the 
     first section of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
     appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation 
     of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
     purposes'', approved July 5, 1884 (23 Stat. 136), from 
     Station 190+00 to Station 378+00 is authorized to a width of 
     75 feet and a depth of 6 feet.

     SEC. 3174. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

       The project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, 
     authorized by the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852 (10 
     Stat. 58), is modified to direct the Secretary to deepen the 
     upstream reach of the navigation channel from 12 feet to 18 
     feet, at a total cost of $405,000.

     SEC. 3175. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS.

       Section 21 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 
     (102 Stat. 4027) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) by striking ``1276.42'' and inserting ``1278.42'';
       (B) by striking ``1218.31'' and inserting ``1221.31''; and
       (C) by striking ``1234.82'' and inserting ``1235.30''; and
       (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
       ``(b) Exception.--The Secretary may operate the headwaters 
     reservoirs below the minimum or above the maximum water 
     levels established in subsection (a) in accordance with water 
     control regulation manuals (or revisions thereto) developed 
     by the Secretary, after consultation with the Governor of 
     Minnesota and affected tribal governments, landowners, and 
     commercial and recreational users. The water control 
     regulation manuals (and any revisions thereto) shall be 
     effective when the Secretary transmits them to Congress. The 
     Secretary shall report to Congress at least 14 days before 
     operating any such headwaters reservoir below the minimum or 
     above the maximum water level limits specified in subsection 
     (a); except that notification is not required for operations 
     necessary to prevent the

[[Page 21786]]

     loss of life or to ensure the safety of the dam or if the 
     drawdown of lake levels is in anticipation of flood control 
     operations.''.

     SEC. 3176. UPPER BASIN OF MISSOURI RIVER.

       (a) Use of Funds.--Notwithstanding the Energy and Water 
     Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103), 
     funds made available for recovery or mitigation activities in 
     the lower basin of the Missouri River may be used for 
     recovery or mitigation activities in the upper basin of the 
     Missouri River, including the States of Montana, Nebraska, 
     North Dakota, and South Dakota.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--The matter under the heading 
     ``Missouri River Mitigation, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and 
     Nebraska'' of section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143), as modified by 
     section 334 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 306), is amended by adding at the end the 
     following: ``The Secretary may carry out any recovery or 
     mitigation activities in the upper basin of the Missouri 
     River, including the States of Montana, Nebraska, North 
     Dakota, and South Dakota, using funds made available under 
     this paragraph in accordance with the Endangered Species Act 
     of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and consistent with the 
     project purposes of the Missouri River Mainstem System as 
     authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of December 
     22, 1944 (58 Stat. 897).''.

     SEC. 3177. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL 
                   MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

       Section 1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(1)(A)(ii)) is 
     amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
     following: ``, including research on water quality issues 
     affecting the Mississippi River (including elevated nutrient 
     levels) and the development of remediation strategies''.

     SEC. 3178. UPPER OHIO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES NAVIGATION SYSTEM 
                   NEW TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM.

       (a) Upper Ohio River and Tributaries Navigation System 
     Defined.--In this section, the term ``Upper Ohio River and 
     Tributaries navigation system'' means the Allegheny, Kanawha, 
     Monongahela, and Ohio Rivers.
       (b) Establishment.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a pilot 
     program to evaluate new technologies applicable to the Upper 
     Ohio River and Tributaries navigation system.
       (2) Inclusions.--The program may include the design, 
     construction, or implementation of innovative technologies 
     and solutions for the Upper Ohio River and Tributaries 
     navigation system, including projects for--
       (A) improved navigation;
       (B) environmental stewardship;
       (C) increased navigation reliability; and
       (D) reduced navigation costs.
       (3) Purposes.--The purposes of the program shall be--
       (A) to increase the reliability and availability of 
     federally owned and federally operated navigation facilities;
       (B) to decrease system operational risks; and
       (C) to improve--
       (i) vessel traffic management;
       (ii) access; and
       (iii) Federal asset management.
       (c) Federal Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
     provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
     the project is federally owned.
       (d) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into local 
     cooperation agreements with non-Federal interests to provide 
     for the design, construction, installation, and operation of 
     the projects to be carried out under the program.
       (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
     into under this subsection shall include the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a navigation 
     improvement project, including appropriate engineering plans 
     and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project.
       (3) Cost sharing.--Total project costs under each local 
     cooperation agreement shall be cost-shared in accordance with 
     the formula relating to the applicable original construction 
     project.
       (4) Expenditures.--
       (A) In general.--Expenditures under the program may 
     include, for establishment at federally owned property, such 
     as locks, dams, and bridges--
       (i) transmitters;
       (ii) responders;
       (iii) hardware;
       (iv) software; and
       (v) wireless networks.
       (B) Exclusions.--Transmitters, responders, hardware, 
     software, and wireless networks and other equipment installed 
     on privately owned vessels or equipment shall not be eligible 
     under the program.
       (e) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
     the pilot program carried out under this section, together 
     with recommendations concerning whether the program or any 
     component of the program should be implemented on a national 
     basis.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,100,000. Such 
     sums shall remain available until expended.

     SEC. 3179. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
     579a(b)(2)), the following projects shall remain authorized 
     to be carried out by the Secretary:
       (1) The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship 
     Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092).
       (2) The project for flood control, Agana River, Guam, 
     authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4127).
       (3) The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and 
     Channels, Maryland and Virginia, authorized by section 101 of 
     the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818).
       (4) The project for navigation, Fall River Harbor, 
     Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
     Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731); except that the authorized 
     depth of that portion of the project extending riverward of 
     the Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall River and 
     Somerset, Massachusetts, shall not exceed 35 feet.
       (5) The project for flood control, Ecorse Creek, Wayne 
     County, Michigan, authorized by section 101(a)(14) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607).
       (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) 
     shall not be authorized for construction after the last day 
     of the 5-year period beginning on the date of enactment of 
     this Act, unless, during such period, funds have been 
     obligated for the construction (including planning and 
     design) of the project.

     SEC. 3180. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

       Each of the following projects may be carried out by the 
     Secretary and no construction on any such project may be 
     initiated until the Secretary determines that the project is 
     feasible:
       (1) Menominee harbor and river, michigan and wisconsin.--
     The project for navigation, Menominee Harbor and River, 
     Michigan and Wisconsin, authorized by section 101 of the 
     River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482) and deauthorized 
     on April 15, 2002, in accordance with section 1001(b)(2) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
     579a(b)(2)).
       (2) Hearding island inlet, duluth harbor, minnesota.--The 
     project for dredging, Hearding Island Inlet, Duluth Harbor, 
     Minnesota, authorized by section 22 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4027).
       (3) Manitowoc harbor, wisconsin.--That portion of the 
     project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, 
     authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act 
     of August 30, 1852 (10 Stat. 58), consisting of the channel 
     in the south part of the outer harbor, deauthorized by 
     section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 
     1176).

     SEC. 3181. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

       (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized 
     after the date of enactment of this Act:
       (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
     authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act 
     of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 919), consisting of an 18-foot 
     channel in Yellow Mill River and described as follows: 
     Beginning at a point along the eastern limit of the existing 
     project, N123,649.75, E481,920.54, thence running 
     northwesterly about 52.64 feet to a point N123,683.03, 
     E481,879.75, thence running northeasterly about 1,442.21 feet 
     to a point N125,030.08, E482,394.96, thence running 
     northeasterly about 139.52 feet to a point along the eastern 
     limit of the existing channel, N125,133.87, E482,488.19, 
     thence running southwesterly about 1,588.98 feet to the point 
     of origin.
       (2) Mystic river, connecticut.--The portion of the project 
     for navigation, Mystic River, Connecticut, authorized by the 
     first section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of 
     September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 436) consisting of a 12-foot-
     deep channel, approximately 7,554 square feet in area, 
     starting at a point N193,086.51, E815,092.78, thence running 
     north 59 degrees 21 minutes 46.63 seconds west about 138.05 
     feet to a point N193,156.86, E814,974.00, thence running 
     north 51 degrees 04 minutes 39.00 seconds west about 166.57 
     feet to a point N193,261.51, E814,844.41, thence running 
     north 43 degrees 01 minutes 34.90 seconds west about 86.23 
     feet to a point N193,324.55, E814,785.57, thence running 
     north 06 degrees 42 minutes 03.86 seconds west about 156.57 
     feet to a point N193,480.05, E814,767.30, thence running 
     south 21 degrees 21 minutes 17.94 seconds east about 231.42 
     feet to a point N193,264.52, E814,851.57, thence running 
     south 53 degrees 34 minutes 23.28 seconds east about 299.78 
     feet to the point of origin.
       (3) Norwalk harbor, connecticut.--
       (A) In general.--The portions of a 10-foot channel of the 
     project for navigation, Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut, 
     authorized by the first section of the Act of March 2, 1919 
     (40 Stat. 1276) and described in subparagraph (B).
       (B) Description of portions.--The portions of the channel 
     referred to in subparagraph (A) are as follows:
       (i) Rectangular portion.--An approximately rectangular-
     shaped section along the northwesterly terminus of the 
     channel. The section is 35-feet wide and about 460-feet long 
     and is further described as commencing at a point 
     N104,165.85, E417,662.71, thence running south 24 degrees 06 
     minutes 55 seconds east 395.00 feet to a point N103,805.32, 
     E417,824.10, thence running south 00 degrees 38 minutes 06 
     seconds east 87.84 feet to a point N103,717.49, E417,825.07, 
     thence running north 24 degrees 06 minutes 55 seconds west

[[Page 21787]]

     480.00 feet, to a point N104,155.59, E417,628.96, thence 
     running north 73 degrees 05 minutes 25 seconds east 35.28 
     feet to the point of origin.
       (ii) Parallelogram-shaped portion.--An area having the 
     approximate shape of a parallelogram along the northeasterly 
     portion of the channel, southeast of the area described in 
     clause (i), approximately 20 feet wide and 260 feet long, and 
     further described as commencing at a point N103,855.48, 
     E417,849.99, thence running south 33 degrees 07 minutes 30 
     seconds east 133.40 feet to a point N103,743.76, E417,922.89, 
     thence running south 24 degrees 07 minutes 04 seconds east 
     127.75 feet to a point N103,627.16, E417,975.09, thence 
     running north 33 degrees 07 minutes 30 seconds west 190.00 
     feet to a point N103,786.28, E417,871.26, thence running 
     north 17 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds west 72.39 feet to the 
     point of origin.
       (C) Exclusion.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
     paragraph, the Secretary shall realign the 10-foot channel 
     potion of the project referred to in subparagraph (A) to 
     include, immediately north of the area described in 
     subparagraph (B)(ii), a triangular section described as 
     commencing at a point N103,968.35, E417,815.29, thence 
     running south 17 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds east 118.09 
     feet to a point N103,855.48, E417,849.99, thence running 
     north 33 degrees 07 minutes 30 seconds west 36.76 feet to a 
     point N103,886.27, E417,829.90, thence running north 10 
     degrees 05 minutes 26 seconds west 83.37 feet to the point of 
     origin.
       (4) Rockland harbor, maine.--The portion of the project for 
     navigation, Rockland Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of 
     June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 202), consisting of a 14-foot channel 
     located in Lermond Cove and beginning at a point with 
     coordinates N99,977.37, E340,290.02, thence running easterly 
     about 200.00 feet to a point with coordinates N99,978.49, 
     E340,490.02, thence running northerly about 138.00 feet to a 
     point with coordinates N100,116.49, E340,289.25, thence 
     running westerly about 200.00 feet to a point with 
     coordinates N100,115.37, E340,289.25, thence running 
     southerly about 138.00 feet to the point of origin.
       (5) Rockport harbor, maine.--
       (A) In general.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
     Rockport Harbor, Maine, authorized by the first section of 
     the Act of August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 400), located within the 
     12-foot anchorage described in subparagraph (B).
       (B) Description of anchorage.--The anchorage referred to in 
     subparagraph (A) is more particularly described as--
       (i) beginning at the westernmost point of the anchorage at 
     N128800.00, E349311.00;
       (ii) thence running north 12 degrees, 52 minutes, 37.2 
     seconds east 127.08 feet to a point N128923.88, E349339.32;
       (iii) thence running north 17 degrees, 40 minutes, 13.0 
     seconds east 338.61 feet to a point N129246.51, E349442.10;
       (iv) thence running south 89 degrees, 21 minutes, 21.0 
     seconds east 45.36 feet to a point N129246.00, E349487.46;
       (v) thence running south 44 degrees, 13 minutes, 32.6 
     seconds east 18.85 feet to a point N129232.49, E349500.61;
       (vi) thence running south 17 degrees, 40 minutes 13.0 
     seconds west 340.50 feet to a point N128908.06, E349397.25;
       (vii) thence running south 12 degrees, 52 minutes, 37.2 
     seconds west 235.41 feet to a point at N128678.57, 
     E349344.79; and
       (viii) thence running north 15 degrees, 32 minutes, 59.3 
     seconds west 126.04 feet to the point of origin.
       (6) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, 
     authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 
     (62 Stat. 1172), beginning at a point along the eastern side 
     of the inner harbor N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running 
     north 25 degrees 48 minutes 54.3 seconds east 160.24 feet to 
     a point N200,559.20, E845,377.76, thence running north 22 
     degrees 7 minutes 52.4 seconds east 596.82 feet to a point 
     N201,112.15, E845,602.60, thence running north 60 degrees 1 
     minute 0.3 seconds east 83.18 feet to a point N201,153.72, 
     E845,674.65, thence running south 24 degrees 56 minutes 43.4 
     seconds west 665.01 feet to a point N200,550.75, E845,394.18, 
     thence running south 32 degrees 25 minutes 29.0 seconds west 
     160.76 feet to the point of origin.
       (7) Island end river, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Island End River, Massachusetts, 
     carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), described as follows: Beginning at a 
     point along the eastern limit of the existing project, 
     N507,348.98, E721,180.01, thence running northeast about 35 
     feet to a point N507,384.17, E721,183.36, thence running 
     northeast about 324 feet to a point N507,590.51, E721,433.17, 
     thence running northeast about 345 feet to a point along the 
     northern limit of the existing project, N507,927.29, 
     E721,510.29, thence running southeast about 25 feet to a 
     point N507,921.71, E721,534.66, thence running southwest 
     about 354 feet to a point N507,576.65, E721,455.64, thence 
     running southwest about 357 feet to the point of origin.
       (8) City waterway, tacoma, washington.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, City Waterway, Tacoma, Washington, 
     authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
     Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 347), 
     consisting of the last 1,000 linear feet of the inner portion 
     of the waterway beginning at station 70+00 and ending at 
     station 80+00.
       (9) Aunt lydia's cove, massachusetts.--
       (A) In general.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
     Aunt Lydia's Cove, Massachusetts, constructed under section 
     107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
     consisting of the 8-foot deep anchorage in the cove described 
     in subparagraph (B).
       (B) Description of portion.--The portion of the project 
     described in subparagraph (A) is more particularly described 
     as the portion beginning at a point along the southern limit 
     of the existing project, N254,332.00, E1,023,103.96, thence 
     running northwesterly about 761.60 feet to a point along the 
     western limit of the existing project N255,076.84, 
     E1,022,945.07, thence running southwesterly about 38.11 feet 
     to a point N255,038.99, E1,022,940.60, thence running 
     southeasterly about 267.07 feet to a point N254,772.00, 
     E1,022,947.00, thence running southeasterly about 462.41 feet 
     to a point N254,320.06, E1,023,044.84, thence running 
     northeasterly about 60.31 feet to the point of origin.
       (10) Whatcom creek waterway, bellingham, washington.--The 
     portion of the project for navigation, Whatcom Creek 
     Waterway, Bellingham, Washington, authorized by the River and 
     Harbor Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 664), and section 101 
     of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 299), 
     consisting of the last 2,900 linear feet of the inner portion 
     of the waterway and beginning at station 29+00 to station 
     0+00.
       (11) Oconto harbor, wisconsin.--
       (A) In general.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
     Oconto Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized by the Act of August 2, 
     1882 (22 Stat. 196), and the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 
     664) (commonly known as the ``River and Harbor Act of 
     1910''), consisting of a 15-foot-deep turning basin in the 
     Oconto River, as described in subparagraph (B).
       (B) Project description.--The project referred to in 
     subparagraph (B) is more particularly described as--
       (i) beginning at a point along the western limit of the 
     existing project, N394,086.71, E2,530,202.71;
       (ii) thence northeasterly about 619.93 feet to a point 
     N394,459.10, E2,530,698.33;
       (iii) thence southeasterly about 186.06 feet to a point 
     N394,299.20, E2,530,793.47;
       (iv) thence southwesterly about 355.07 feet to a point 
     N393,967.13, E2,530,667.76;
       (v) thence southwesterly about 304.10 feet to a point 
     N393,826.90, E2,530,397.92; and
       (vi) thence northwesterly about 324.97 feet to the point of 
     origin.
       (b) Anchorage Area, New London Harbor, Connecticut.--The 
     portion of the project for navigation, New London Harbor, 
     Connecticut, authorized by the River and Harbor 
     Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 333), that 
     consists of a 23-foot waterfront channel and that is further 
     described as beginning at a point along the western limit of 
     the existing project, N188, 802.75, E779, 462.81, thence 
     running northeasterly about 1,373.88 feet to a point N189, 
     554.87, E780, 612.53, thence running southeasterly about 
     439.54 feet to a point N189, 319.88, E780, 983.98, thence 
     running southwesterly about 831.58 feet to a point N188, 
     864.63, E780, 288.08, thence running southeasterly about 
     567.39 feet to a point N188, 301.88, E780, 360.49, thence 
     running northwesterly about 1,027.96 feet to the point of 
     origin, is redesignated as an anchorage area.
       (c) Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut.--The project 
     for navigation, Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut, 
     authorized by section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of March 
     2, 1829, and by the first section of the River and Harbor Act 
     of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1029), and section 364 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3733-
     3734), is modified to redesignate a portion of the 9-foot-
     deep channel to an anchorage area, approximately 900 feet in 
     length and 90,000 square feet in area, and lying generally 
     north of a line with points at coordinates N108,043.45, 
     E452,252.04 and N107,938.74, E452,265.74.
       (d) Saco River, Maine.--The portion of the project for 
     navigation, Saco River, Maine, constructed under section 107 
     of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and 
     described as a 6-foot deep, 10-acre maneuvering basin located 
     at the head of navigation, is redesignated as an anchorage 
     area.
       (e) Union River, Maine.--The project for navigation, Union 
     River, Maine, authorized by the first section of the Act of 
     June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 215), is modified by redesignating as 
     an anchorage area that portion of the project consisting of a 
     6-foot turning basin and lying northerly of a line commencing 
     at a point N315,975.13, E1,004,424.86, thence running north 
     61 degrees 27 minutes 20.71 seconds west about 132.34 feet to 
     a point N316,038.37, E1,004,308.61.
       (f) Mystic River, Massachusetts.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Mystic River, Massachusetts, 
     authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
     Appropriations Act of July 13, 1892 (27 Stat. 96), between a 
     line starting at a point N515,683.77, E707,035.45 and ending 
     at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85 and a line starting at a 
     point N514,595.15, E707,746.15 and ending at a point 
     N514,732.94, E707,658.38 shall be relocated and reduced from 
     a 100-foot wide channel to a 50-foot wide channel after the 
     date of enactment of this Act described as follows: Beginning 
     at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85, thence running 
     southeasterly about 840.50 feet to a point N515,070.16, 
     E707,601.27, thence running southeasterly about 177.54 feet 
     to a point N514,904.84, E707,665.98, thence running 
     southeasterly about 319.90 feet to a point with coordinates 
     N514,595.15, E707,746.15, thence running northwesterly about 
     163.37 feet to a point N514,732.94, E707,658.38, thence 
     running northwesterly about 161.58 feet to a point 
     N514.889.47,

[[Page 21788]]

     E707,618.30, thence running northwesterly about 166.61 feet 
     to a point N515.044.62, E707,557.58, thence running 
     northwesterly about 825.31 feet to a point N515,683.77, 
     E707,035.45, thence running northeasterly about 50.90 feet 
     returning to a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85.
       (g) Rivercenter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.--Section 38(c) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 
     59j-1; 102 Stat. 4038) is amended by striking ``subsection 
     (a) of this section'' and inserting ``subsection (a) (except 
     30 years from such date of enactment, in the case of the area 
     or any part thereof described in subsection (a)(5))''.
       (h) Additional Deauthorizations.--The following projects 
     are not authorized after the date of enactment of this Act, 
     except with respect to any portion of such a project which 
     portion has been completed before such date or is under 
     construction on such date:
       (1) The project for flood protection on Atascadero Creek 
     and its tributaries of Goleta, California, authorized by 
     section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1826).
       (2) The project for the construction of bridge fenders for 
     the Summit and St. Georges Bridge for the Inland Waterway of 
     the Delaware River to the C & D Canal of the Chesapeake Bay, 
     Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the River and Harbor Act 
     of 1954 (68 Stat. 1249).
       (3) The project for flood control, central and southern 
     Florida, Shingle Creek basin, Florida, authorized by section 
     203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1182).
       (4) The project for flood control, Brevoort, Indiana, 
     authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 
     1936 (49 Stat. 1587).
       (5) The project for flood control, Middle Wabash, 
     Greenfield Bayou, Indiana, authorized by section 10 of the 
     Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 649).
       (6) The project for flood damage reduction, Lake George, 
     Hobart, Indiana, authorized by section 602(a)(2) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148).
       (7) The project for navigation at the Muscatine Harbor on 
     the Mississippi River at Muscatine, Iowa, authorized by 
     section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 
     166).
       (8) The project for flood control and water supply, Eagle 
     Creek Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1188).
       (9) The project for flood control, Hazard, Kentucky, 
     authorized by section 3(a)(7) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1988 (100 Stat. 4014) and section 108 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4621).
       (10) The project for flood control, western Kentucky 
     tributaries, Kentucky, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1076) and modified by section 
     210 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1829).
       (11) The project for flood damage reduction, Tensas-
     Cocodrie area, Louisiana, authorized by section 3 of the 
     Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 643).
       (12) The uncompleted portions of the project for navigation 
     improvement for Bayou LaFourche and LaFourche Jump, 
     Louisiana, authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 
     1033), and the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481).
       (13) The project for flood control, Eastern Rapides and 
     South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, Louisiana, authorized by 
     section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825).
       (14) The project for erosion protection and recreation, 
     Fort Livingston, Grande Terre Island, Louisiana, authorized 
     by the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426e et seq).
       (15) The project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine, 
     authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 
     12).
       (16) The project for navigation, Tenants Harbor, Maine, 
     authorized by the first section of the Act of March 2, 1919 
     (40 Stat. 1275).
       (17) The project for navigation, New York Harbor and 
     adjacent channels, Claremont Terminal, Jersey City, New 
     Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098).
       (18) The project for navigation, Olcott Harbor, Lake 
     Ontario, New York, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143).
       (19) The project for navigation, Outer Harbor, Buffalo, New 
     York, authorized by section 110 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4817).
       (20) The project for the Columbia River, Seafarers 
     Memorial, Hammond, Oregon, authorized by title I of the 
     Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1991 (104 
     Stat. 2078).
       (21) The project for navigation, Narragansett Town Beach, 
     Narragansett, Rhode Island, authorized by section 361 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4861).
       (22) The project for bulkhead repairs, Quonset Point-
     Davisville, Rhode Island, authorized by section 571 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3788).
       (23) The structural portion of the project for flood 
     control, Cypress Creek, Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 
     4014).
       (24) The project for flood protection, East Fork Channel 
     Improvement, Increment 2, East Fork of the Trinity River, 
     Texas, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1962 (76 Stat. 1185).
       (25) The project for flood control, Falfurrias, Texas, 
     authorized by section 3(a)(14) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).
       (26) The project for flood control, Pecan Bayou Lake, 
     Texas, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1968 (82 Stat. 742).
       (27) The project for navigation improvements affecting Lake 
     of the Pines, Texas, for the portion of the Red River below 
     Fulton, Arkansas, authorized by the Act of July 13, 1892 (27 
     Stat. 103) and modified by the Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 
     635), the Act of May 17, 1950 (64 Stat. 163), and the River 
     and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731).
       (28) The project for navigation, Tennessee Colony Lake, 
     Trinity River, Texas, authorized by section 204 of the River 
     and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091).
       (29) The project for streambank erosion, Kanawha River, 
     Charleston, West Virginia, authorized by section 603(f)(13) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
     4153).

     SEC. 3182. LAND CONVEYANCES.

       (a) St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
     Arkansas, without monetary consideration and subject to 
     paragraph (2), all right, title, and interest in and to real 
     property within the State acquired by the Federal Government 
     as mitigation land for the project for flood control, St. 
     Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri Project, authorized by 
     the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702a et 
     seq.).
       (2) Terms and conditions.--
       (A) In general.--The conveyance by the United States under 
     this subsection shall be subject to--
       (i) the condition that the State of Arkansas agree to 
     operate, maintain, and manage the real property for fish and 
     wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes at no cost 
     or expense to the United States; and
       (ii) such other terms and conditions as the Secretary 
     determines to be in the interest of the United States.
       (B) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the real 
     property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
     public ownership or the State ceases to operate, maintain, 
     and manage the real property in accordance with this 
     subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
     property shall revert to the United States, at the option of 
     the Secretary.
       (3) Mitigation.--Nothing in this subsection extinguishes 
     the responsibility of the Federal Government or the non-
     Federal interest for the project referred to in paragraph (1) 
     from the obligation to implement mitigation for such project 
     that existed on the day prior to the transfer authorized by 
     this subsection.
       (b) Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, California.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may convey, by separate 
     quitclaim deeds, as soon as the conveyance of each individual 
     portion is practicable, the title of the United States in and 
     to all or portions of the approximately 86 acres of upland, 
     tideland, and submerged land, commonly referred to as the 
     ``Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal'', California (referred to 
     in this section as the ``Canal Property''), as follows:
       (A) To the city of Oakland, without consideration, the 
     title of the United States in and to all or portions of that 
     part of the Canal Property that are located within the 
     boundaries of the City of Oakland.
       (B) To the city of Alameda, or to a public entity created 
     by or designated by the city of Alameda that is eligible to 
     hold title to real property, without consideration, the title 
     of the United States in and to all or portions of that part 
     of the Canal Property that are located within the boundaries 
     of the city of Alameda.
       (C) To the owners of lands adjacent to the Canal Property, 
     or to a public entity created by or designated by one or more 
     of the adjacent land owners that are eligible to hold title 
     to real property, at fair market value, the title of the 
     United States in and to all or portions of that part of the 
     Canal Property that are located within the boundaries of the 
     city in which the adjacent land is located.
       (2) Requirement.--The Secretary may reserve and retain from 
     any conveyance under this subsection a right-of-way or other 
     rights as the Secretary determines to be necessary for the 
     operation and maintenance of the authorized Federal channel 
     in the Canal Property.
       (3) Annual reports.--Until the date on which each 
     conveyance described in paragraph (1) is complete, the 
     Secretary shall submit, by not later than November 30 of each 
     year, to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
     Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
     the House of Representatives an annual report that describes 
     the efforts of the Secretary to complete that conveyance 
     during the preceding fiscal year.
       (4) Form.--A conveyance made under this subsection may be, 
     in whole or in part, in the form of an easement.
       (5) Right of first refusal.--For any property on which an 
     easement is granted under this subsection, should the 
     Secretary seek to dispose of the property, the holder of the 
     easement shall have the right of first refusal to the 
     property without cost or consideration.
       (6) Repeal.--Section 205 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4633; 110 Stat. 3748) is repealed.
       (c) Milford, Kansas.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
     deed without consideration to the Geary County Fire 
     Department, Milford, Kansas, all right, title, and interest 
     of the United States in and to real property consisting of 
     approximately 7.4 acres located in Geary County, Kansas, for 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of a fire station.

[[Page 21789]]

       (2) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the real 
     property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
     public ownership or ceases to be operated and maintained as a 
     fire station, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
     property shall revert to the United States, at the option of 
     the United States.
       (d) Strawn Cemetery, John Redmond Lake, Kansas.--
       (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting through the 
     Tulsa District of the Corps of Engineers, shall transfer to 
     Pleasant Township, Coffey County, Kansas, for use as the New 
     Strawn Cemetery, all right, title, and interest of the United 
     States in and to the land described in paragraph (3).
       (2) Reversion.--If the land transferred under this 
     subsection ceases at any time to be used as a nonprofit 
     cemetery or for another public purpose, the land shall revert 
     to the United States.
       (3) Description.--The land to be conveyed under this 
     subsection is a tract of land near John Redmond Lake, Kansas, 
     containing approximately 3 acres and lying adjacent to the 
     west line of the Strawn Cemetery located in the SE corner of 
     the NE\1/4\ of section 32, township 20 south, range 14 east, 
     Coffey County, Kansas.
       (e) Pike County, Missouri.--
       (1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
     definitions apply:
       (A) Federal land.--The term ``Federal land'' means the 2 
     parcels of Corps of Engineers land totaling approximately 42 
     acres, located on Buffalo Island in Pike County, Missouri, 
     and consisting of Government Tract Numbers MIS-7 and a 
     portion of FM-46.
       (B) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' means 
     the approximately 42 acres of land, subject to any existing 
     flowage easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, upstream 
     and northwest, about 200 feet from Drake Island (also known 
     as Grimes Island).
       (2) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraph (3), on conveyance 
     by S.S.S., Inc., to the United States of all right, title, 
     and interest in and to the non-Federal land, the Secretary 
     shall convey to S.S.S., Inc., all right, title, and interest 
     of the United States in and to the Federal land.
       (3) Conditions.--
       (A) Deeds.--
       (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of the non-Federal 
     land to the Secretary shall be by a warranty deed acceptable 
     to the Secretary.
       (ii) Federal land.--The conveyance of the Federal land to 
     S.S.S., Inc., shall be--

       (I) by quitclaim deed; and
       (II) subject to any reservations, terms, and conditions 
     that the Secretary determines to be necessary to allow the 
     United States to operate and maintain the Mississippi River 
     9-Foot Navigation Project.

       (iii) Legal descriptions.--The Secretary shall provide a 
     legal description of the Federal land, and S.S.S., Inc., 
     shall provide a legal description of the non-Federal land, 
     for inclusion in the deeds referred to in clauses (i) and 
     (ii).
       (B) Removal of improvements.--
       (i) In general.--The Secretary may require the removal of, 
     or S.S.S., Inc., may voluntarily remove, any improvements to 
     the non-Federal land before the completion of the exchange or 
     as a condition of the exchange.
       (ii) No liability.--If S.S.S., Inc., removes any 
     improvements to the non-Federal land under clause (i)--

       (I) S.S.S., Inc., shall have no claim against the United 
     States relating to the removal; and
       (II) the United States shall not incur or be liable for any 
     cost associated with the removal or relocation of the 
     improvements.

       (C) Administrative costs.--The Secretary shall require 
     S.S.S., Inc. to pay reasonable administrative costs 
     associated with the exchange.
       (D) Cash equalization payment.--If the appraised fair 
     market value, as determined by the Secretary, of the Federal 
     land exceeds the appraised fair market value, as determined 
     by the Secretary, of the non-Federal land, S.S.S., Inc., 
     shall make a cash equalization payment to the United States.
       (E) Deadline.--The land exchange under subparagraph (B) 
     shall be completed not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act.
       (f) Union Lake, Missouri.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall offer to convey to the 
     State of Missouri, before June 30, 2007, all right, title, 
     and interest in and to approximately 205.50 acres of land 
     described in paragraph (2) purchased for the Union Lake 
     Project that was deauthorized as of January 1, 1990 (55 Fed. 
     Reg. 40906), in accordance with section 1001(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)).
       (2) Land description.--The land referred to in paragraph 
     (1) is described as follows:
       (A) Tract 500.--A tract of land situated in Franklin 
     County, Missouri, being part of the SW\1/4\ of section 7, and 
     the NW\1/4\ of the SW\1/4\ of section 8, township 42 north, 
     range 2 west of the fifth principal meridian, consisting of 
     approximately 112.50 acres.
       (B) Tract 605.--A tract of land situated in Franklin 
     County, Missouri, being part of the N\1/2\ of the NE, and 
     part of the SE of the NE of section 18, township 42 north, 
     range 2 west of the fifth principal meridian, consisting of 
     approximately 93.00 acres.
       (3) Conveyance.--On acceptance by the State of Missouri of 
     the offer by the Secretary under paragraph (1), the land 
     described in paragraph (2) shall immediately be conveyed, in 
     its current condition, by Secretary to the State of Missouri.
       (g) Boardman, Oregon.--Section 501(g)(1) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3751) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``city of Boardman,'' and inserting ``the 
     Boardman Park and Recreation District, Boardman,''; and
       (2) by striking ``such city'' and inserting ``the city of 
     Boardman''.
       (h) Lookout Point Project, Lowell, Oregon.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may convey without 
     consideration to Lowell School District, by quitclaim deed, 
     all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
     land and buildings thereon, known as Tract A-82, located in 
     Lowell, Oregon, and described in paragraph (2).
       (2) Description of property.--The parcel of land authorized 
     to be conveyed under paragraph (1) is as follows: Commencing 
     at the point of intersection of the west line of Pioneer 
     Street with the westerly extension of the north line of 
     Summit Street, in Meadows Addition to Lowell, as platted and 
     recorded at page 56 of Volume 4, Lane County Oregon Plat 
     Records; thence north on the west line of Pioneer Street a 
     distance of 176.0 feet to the true point of beginning of this 
     description; thence north on the west line of Pioneer Street 
     a distance of 170.0 feet; thence west at right angles to the 
     west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 250.0 feet; thence 
     south and parallel to the west line of Pioneer Street a 
     distance of 170.0 feet; thence east 250.0 feet to the true 
     point of beginning of this description in Section 14, 
     Township 19 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, 
     Lane County, Oregon.
       (3) Terms and conditions.--Before conveying the parcel to 
     the school district, the Secretary shall ensure that the 
     conditions of buildings and facilities meet the requirements 
     of applicable Federal law.
       (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
     property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
     public ownership, all right, title, and interest in and to 
     the property shall revert to the United States, at the option 
     of the United States.
       (i) Richard B. Russell Lake, South Carolina.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey, at fair market 
     value, to the State of South Carolina, by quitclaim deed, all 
     right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
     parcels of land described in paragraph (2)(A) that are 
     managed, as of the date of enactment of this Act, by the 
     South Carolina department of commerce for public recreation 
     purposes for the Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South 
     Carolina, project authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420).
       (2) Land description.--
       (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), the 
     parcels of land referred to in paragraph (1) are the parcels 
     contained in the portion of land described in Army Lease 
     Number DACW21-1-92-0500.
       (B) Retention of interests.--The United States shall 
     retain--
       (i) ownership of all land included in the lease referred to 
     in subparagraph (A) that would have been acquired for 
     operational purposes in accordance with the 1971 
     implementation of the 1962 Army/Interior Joint Acquisition 
     Policy; and
       (ii) such other land as is determined by the Secretary to 
     be required for authorized project purposes, including 
     easement rights-of-way to remaining Federal land.
       (C) Survey.--The cost of the survey shall be paid by the 
     State.
       (3) Costs of conveyance.--
       (A) In general.--The State shall be responsible for all 
     costs, including real estate transaction and environmental 
     costs, associated with the conveyance under this subsection.
       (B) Form of contribution.--As determined appropriate by the 
     Secretary, in lieu of payment of compensation to the United 
     States under subparagraph (A), the State may perform certain 
     environmental or real estate actions associated with the 
     conveyance under this subsection if those actions are 
     performed in close coordination with, to the satisfaction of, 
     and in compliance with the laws of the United States.
       (4) Additional terms and conditions.--
       (A) No effect on shore management policy.--The Shoreline 
     Management Policy (ER-1130-2-406) of the Corps of Engineers 
     may not be changed or altered for any proposed development of 
     land conveyed under this subsection.
       (B) Cost sharing.--In carrying out the conveyance under 
     this subsection, the Secretary and the State shall comply 
     with all obligations of any cost sharing agreement between 
     the Secretary and the State in effect as of the date of the 
     conveyance.
       (C) Land not conveyed.--The State shall continue to manage 
     the land that is subject to Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-
     0500 and that is not conveyed under this subsection in 
     accordance with the terms and conditions of Army Lease Number 
     DACW21-1-92-0500.
       (j) Denison, Texas.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall offer to convey at 
     fair market value to the city of Denison, Texas, all right, 
     title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
     approximately 900 acres of land located in Grayson County, 
     Texas, which is currently subject to an application for lease 
     for public park and recreational purposes made by the city of 
     Denison, dated August 17, 2005.
       (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
     and description of the real property referred to in paragraph 
     (1) shall be determined by a survey paid for by the city of 
     Denison, Texas, that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
       (3) Conveyance.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     acceptance by the city of Denison,

[[Page 21790]]

     Texas, of an offer under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 
     convey the land surveyed under paragraph (2) by quitclaim 
     deed to the city of Denison, Texas.
       (k) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
       (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
     and the legal description of any real property to be conveyed 
     under this section shall be determined by a survey that is 
     satisfactory to the Secretary.
       (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
     Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
     to any conveyance under this section.
       (3) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
     require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
     such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary 
     considers appropriate and necessary to protect the interests 
     of the United States.
       (4) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance 
     is made under this section shall be responsible for all 
     reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate 
     transaction and environmental documentation costs, associated 
     with the conveyance.
       (5) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made 
     under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
     any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or 
     after the date of the conveyance, on the real property 
     conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any 
     liability with respect to activities carried out, before such 
     date, on the real property conveyed.

     SEC. 3183. EXTINGUISHMENT OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AND USE 
                   RESTRICTIONS.

       (a) Idaho.--
       (1) In general.--With respect to the property covered by 
     each deed in paragraph (2)--
       (A) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
     relating to port and industrial use purposes are 
     extinguished;
       (B) the restriction that no activity shall be permitted 
     that will compete with services and facilities offered by 
     public marinas is extinguished; and
       (C) the human habitation or other building structure use 
     restriction is extinguished if the elevation of the property 
     is above the standard project flood elevation.
       (2) Affected deeds.--The deeds with the following county 
     auditor's file numbers are referred to in paragraph (1):
       (A) Auditor's Instrument No. 399218 of Nez Perce County, 
     Idaho--2.07 acres.
       (B) Auditor's Instrument No. 487437 of Nez Perce County, 
     Idaho--7.32 acres.
       (b) Lake Texoma, Oklahoma.--
       (1) Release.--Any reversionary interest relating to public 
     parks and recreation on the land conveyed by the Secretary to 
     the State of Oklahoma at Lake Texoma pursuant to the Act 
     entitled ``An Act to authorize the sale of certain lands to 
     the State of Oklahoma'' (67 Stat. 63), shall terminate on the 
     date of enactment of this Act.
       (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable after 
     the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
     execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, 
     an amended deed, or any other appropriate instrument to 
     release each reversionary interest to which paragraph (1) 
     applies.
       (3) Preservation of reserved rights.--A release of a 
     reversionary interest under this subsection shall not affect 
     any other right of the United States in any deed of 
     conveyance pursuant to the Act referred to in paragraph (1).
       (c) Lowell, Oregon.--
       (1) Release and extinguishment of deed reservations.--
       (A) Release and extinguishment of deed reservations.--The 
     Secretary may release and extinguish the deed reservations 
     for access and communication cables contained in the 
     quitclaim deed, dated January 26, 1965, and recorded February 
     15, 1965, in the records of Lane County, Oregon; except that 
     such reservations may only be released and extinguished for 
     the lands owned by the city of Lowell as described in the 
     quitclaim deed, dated April 11, 1991, in such records.
       (B) Additional release and extinguishment of deed 
     reservations.--The Secretary may also release and extinguish 
     the same deed reservations referred to in subparagraph (A) 
     over land owned by Lane County, Oregon, within the city 
     limits of Lowell, Oregon, to accommodate the development 
     proposals of the city of Lowell/St. Vincent de Paul, Lane 
     County, affordable housing project; except that the Secretary 
     may require, at no cost to the United States--
       (i) the alteration or relocation of any existing 
     facilities, utilities, roads, or similar improvements on such 
     lands; and
       (ii) the right-of-way for such facilities, utilities, 
     roads, or improvements as a precondition of any release or 
     extinguishment of the deed reservations.
       (2) Conveyance.--The Secretary may convey to the city of 
     Lowell, Oregon, the parcel of land situated in the city of 
     Lowell, Oregon, at fair market value consisting of the strip 
     of federally owned lands located northeast of West Boundary 
     Road between Hyland Lane and the city of Lowell's eastward 
     city limits.
       (3) Administrative cost.--Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) 
     and (2), the city of Lowell, Oregon, shall pay the 
     administrative costs incurred by the United States to execute 
     the release and extinguishment of the deed reservations under 
     paragraph (1) and the conveyance under paragraph (2).
       (d) Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, 
     Tennessee.--
       (1) Release of retained rights, interests, reservations.--
     With respect to land conveyed by the Secretary to the 
     Tennessee Society of Crippled Children and Adults, 
     Incorporated (commonly known as ``Easter Seals Tennessee'') 
     at Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee, 
     under section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
     1087), the reversionary interests and the use restrictions 
     relating to recreation and camping purposes are extinguished.
       (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable after 
     the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
     execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, 
     amended deed, or other appropriate instrument effectuating 
     the release of interests required by paragraph (1).
       (e) Lower Granite Pool, Washington.--
       (1) Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
     restrictions.--With respect to property covered by each deed 
     described in paragraph (2)--
       (A) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
     relating to port or industrial purposes are extinguished; and
       (B) the human habitation or other building structure use 
     restriction is extinguished in each area in which the 
     elevation is above the standard project flood elevation.
       (2) Deeds.--The deeds referred to in paragraph (1) are as 
     follows:
       (A) Auditor's File Numbers 432576, 443411, 499988, and 
     579771 of Whitman County, Washington.
       (B) Auditor's File Numbers 125806, 138801, 147888, 154511, 
     156928, and 176360 of Asotin County, Washington.
       (f) Port of Pasco, Washington.--
       (1) Extinguishment of use restrictions and flowage 
     easement.--With respect to the property covered by the deed 
     in paragraph (3)(A)--
       (A) the flowage easement and human habitation or other 
     building structure use restriction is extinguished if the 
     elevation of the property is above the standard project flood 
     elevation; and
       (B) the use of fill material to raise areas of the property 
     above the standard project flood elevation is authorized, 
     except in any area for which a permit under section 404 of 
     the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) is 
     required.
       (2) Extinguishment of flowage easement.--With respect to 
     the property covered by each deed in paragraph (3)(B), the 
     flowage easement is extinguished if the elevation of the 
     property is above the standard project flood elevation.
       (3) Affected deeds.--The deeds referred to in paragraphs 
     (1) and (2) are as follows:
       (A) Auditor's File Number 262980 of Franklin County, 
     Washington.
       (B) Auditor's File Numbers 263334 and 404398 of Franklin 
     County, Washington.
       (g) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section 
     affects the remaining rights and interests of the Corps of 
     Engineers for authorized project purposes.
                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

     SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

       Section 455 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-21) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(g) In-Kind Contributions for Study.--The non-Federal 
     interest may provide up to 100 percent of the non-Federal 
     share required under subsection (f) in the form of in-kind 
     services and materials.''.

     SEC. 4002. LAKE ERIE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the nature 
     and frequency of avian botulism problems in the vicinity of 
     Lake Erie associated with dredged material disposal sites and 
     shall make recommendations to eliminate the conditions that 
     result in such problems.

     SEC. 4003. SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES DROUGHT STUDY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
     Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the 
     Secretary of Commerce, and other appropriate agencies, shall 
     conduct, at Federal expense, a comprehensive study of drought 
     conditions in the southwestern United States, with particular 
     emphasis on the Colorado River basin, the Rio Grande River 
     basin, and the Great Basin.
       (b) Inventory of Actions.--In conducting the study, the 
     Secretary shall assemble an inventory of actions taken or 
     planned to be taken to address drought-related situations in 
     the southwestern United States.
       (c) Purpose.--The purpose of the study shall be to develop 
     recommendations to more effectively address current and 
     future drought conditions in the southwestern United States.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
     to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section 
     $7,000,000. Such funds shall remain available until expended.

     SEC. 4004. DELAWARE RIVER.

       The Secretary shall review, in consultation with the 
     Delaware River Basin Commission and the States of Delaware, 
     Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, the report of the 
     Chief of Engineers on the Delaware River, published as House 
     Document Numbered 522, 87th Congress, Second Session, as it 
     relates to the Mid-Delaware River Basin from Wilmington to 
     Port Jervis, and any other pertinent reports (including the 
     strategy for resolution of interstate flow management issues 
     in the Delaware River Basin dated August 2004 and the 
     National Park Service Lower Delaware River Management Plan

[[Page 21791]]

     (1997-1999)), with a view to determining whether any 
     modifications of recommendations contained in the first 
     report referred to are advisable at the present time, in the 
     interest of flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, 
     and other related problems.

     SEC. 4005. EURASIAN MILFOIL.

       Under the authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary shall conduct a 
     study, at Federal expense, to develop national protocols for 
     the use of the Euhrychiopsis lecontei weevil for biological 
     control of Eurasian milfoil in the lakes of Vermont and other 
     northeastern States.

     SEC. 4006. FIRE ISLAND, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for navigational 
     improvements, including a barge landing facility, Fire 
     Island, Alaska.

     SEC. 4007. KNIK ARM, COOK INLET, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     potential impacts on navigation of construction of a bridge 
     across Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.

     SEC. 4008. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation, 
     Kuskokwim River, Alaska, in the vicinity of the village of 
     Crooked Creek.

     SEC. 4009. NOME HARBOR, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall review the project for navigation, Nome 
     Harbor improvements, Alaska, authorized by section 101(a)(1) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
     273), to determine whether the project cost increases, 
     including the cost of rebuilding the entrance channel damaged 
     in a September 2005 storm, resulted from a design deficiency.

     SEC. 4010. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of providing navigation improvements at St. 
     George Harbor, Alaska.

     SEC. 4011. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for hydropower, 
     recreation, and related purposes on the Susitna River, 
     Alaska.

     SEC. 4012. VALDEZ, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation, Valdez, 
     Alaska, and if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     feasible, shall carry out the project at a total cost of 
     $20,000,000.

     SEC. 4013. GILA BEND, MARICOPA, ARIZONA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
     damage reduction, Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
       (b) Review of Plans.--In conducting the study, the 
     Secretary shall review plans and designs developed by non-
     Federal interests and shall incorporate such plans and 
     designs into the Federal study if the Secretary determines 
     that such plans and designs are consistent with Federal 
     standards.

     SEC. 4014. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of using Greers Ferry Lake as a water supply 
     source for Searcy County, Arkansas.

     SEC. 4015. ALISO CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for streambank 
     protection and environmental restoration along Aliso Creek, 
     California.

     SEC. 4016. FRESNO, KINGS, AND KERN COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for 
     Fresno, Kings, and Kern Counties, California.

     SEC. 4017. FRUITVALE AVENUE RAILROAD BRIDGE, ALAMEDA, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall prepare a 
     comprehensive report that examines the condition of the 
     existing Fruitvale Avenue Railroad Bridge, Alameda County, 
     California (referred to in this section as the ``Railroad 
     Bridge''), and determines the most economic means to maintain 
     that rail link by either repairing or replacing the Railroad 
     Bridge.
       (b) Requirements.--The report under this section shall 
     include--
       (1) a determination of whether the Railroad Bridge is in 
     immediate danger of failing or collapsing;
       (2) the annual costs to maintain the Railroad Bridge;
       (3) the costs to place the Railroad Bridge in a safe, ``no-
     collapse'' condition, such that the Railroad Bridge will not 
     endanger maritime traffic;
       (4) the costs to retrofit the Railroad Bridge such that the 
     Railroad Bridge may continue to serve as a rail link between 
     the Island of Alameda and the mainland; and
       (5) the costs to construct a replacement for the Railroad 
     Bridge capable of serving the current and future rail, light 
     rail, and homeland security needs of the region.
       (c) Submission of Report.--The Secretary shall--
       (1) complete the Railroad Bridge report under subsection 
     (a) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 
     this Act; and
       (2) submit the report to the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works of the Senate and Committee on Transportation 
     and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
       (d) Limitations.--The Secretary shall not--
       (1) demolish the Railroad Bridge or otherwise render the 
     Railroad Bridge unavailable or unusable for rail traffic; or
       (2) reduce maintenance of the Railroad Bridge.
       (e) Easement.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide to the city of 
     Alameda, California, a nonexclusive access easement over the 
     Oakland Estuary that comprises the subsurface land and 
     surface approaches for the Railroad Bridge that--
       (A) is consistent with the Bay Trail Proposal of the city 
     of Oakland; and
       (B) is otherwise suitable for the improvement, operation, 
     and maintenance of the Railroad Bridge or construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of a suitable replacement bridge.
       (2) Cost.--The easement under paragraph (1) shall be 
     provided to the city of Alameda without consideration and at 
     no cost to the United States.

     SEC. 4018. LOS ANGELES RIVER REVITALIZATION STUDY, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
     city of Los Angeles, shall--
       (1) prepare a feasibility study for environmental ecosystem 
     restoration, flood control, recreation, and other aspects of 
     Los Angeles River revitalization that is consistent with the 
     goals of the Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan 
     published by the city of Los Angeles; and
       (2) consider any locally-preferred project alternatives 
     developed through a full and open evaluation process for 
     inclusion in the study.
       (b) Use of Existing Information and Measures.--In preparing 
     the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall use, to 
     the maximum extent practicable--
       (1) information obtained from the Los Angeles River 
     Revitalization Master Plan; and
       (2) the development process of that plan.
       (c) Demonstration Projects.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to construct 
     demonstration projects in order to provide information to 
     develop the study under subsection (a)(1).
       (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 
     project under this subsection shall be not more than 65 
     percent.
       (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $25,000,000.

     SEC. 4019. LYTLE CREEK, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction and groundwater recharge, Lytle Creek, Rialto, 
     California.

     SEC. 4020. MOKELUMNE RIVER, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for water 
     supply along the Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, 
     California.
       (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
     section shall be construed to invalidate, preempt, or create 
     any exception to State water law, State water rights, or 
     Federal or State permitted activities or agreements.

     SEC. 4021. ORICK, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
     damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Orick, 
     California.
       (b) Feasibility of Restoring or Rehabilitating Redwook 
     Creek Levees.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
     determine the feasibility of restoring or rehabilitating the 
     Redwood Creek Levees, Humboldt County, California.

     SEC. 4022. SHORELINE STUDY, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

       Section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
     (114 Stat. 2636) is amended by striking ``32 months'' and 
     inserting ``44 months''.

     SEC. 4023. RIALTO, FONTANA, AND COLTON, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for 
     Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California.

     SEC. 4024. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study to 
     determine the feasibility of, and alternatives for, measures 
     to protect water diversion facilities and fish protective 
     screen facilities in the vicinity of river mile 178 on the 
     Sacramento River, California.

     SEC. 4025. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, San 
     Diego County, California, including a review of the 
     feasibility of connecting 4 existing reservoirs to increase 
     usable storage capacity.

     SEC. 4026. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of the beneficial use of dredged 
     material from the San Francisco Bay in the Sacramento-San 
     Joaquin Delta, California, including the benefits and impacts 
     of salinity in the Delta and the benefits to navigation, 
     flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, water quality, 
     salinity control, water supply reliability, and recreation.
       (b) Cooperation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
     shall cooperate with the California department of water 
     resources and appropriate Federal and State entities in 
     developing options for the beneficial use of dredged material 
     from San Francisco Bay for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta 
     area.
       (c) Review.--The study shall include a review of the 
     feasibility of using Sherman Island as a

[[Page 21792]]

     rehandling site for levee maintenance material, as well as 
     for ecosystem restoration. The review may include carrying 
     out and monitoring a pilot project using up to 150,000 cubic 
     yards of dredged material and being carried out at the 
     Sherman Island site, examining larger scale use of dredged 
     materials from the San Francisco Bay and Suisun Bay Channel, 
     and analyzing the feasibility of the potential use of saline 
     materials from the San Francisco Bay for both rehandling and 
     ecosystem restoration purposes.

     SEC. 4027. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with non-
     Federal interests, shall conduct a study of the feasibility 
     of carrying out a project for--
       (1) flood damage reduction along the South San Francisco 
     Bay shoreline, California;
       (2) restoration of the South San Francisco Bay salt ponds 
     (including on land owned by other Federal agencies); and
       (3) other related purposes, as the Secretary determines to 
     be appropriate.
       (b) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
     a report describing the results of the study under subsection 
     (a).
       (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
     include recommendations of the Secretary with respect to the 
     project described in subsection (a) based on planning, 
     design, and land acquisition documents prepared by--
       (A) the California State Coastal Conservancy;
       (B) the Santa Clara Valley Water District; and
       (C) other local interests.
       (c) Credit.--
       (1) In general.--In accordance with section 221 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), and subject 
     to paragraph (2), the Secretary shall credit toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of any project authorized by law as 
     a result of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline study--
       (A) the cost of work performed by the non-Federal interest 
     in preparation of the feasibility study that is conducted 
     before the date of the feasibility cost sharing agreement; 
     and
       (B) the funds expended by the non-Federal interest for 
     acquisition costs of land that constitutes a part of such a 
     project and that is owned by the United States Fish and 
     Wildlife Service.
       (2) Conditions.--The Secretary may provide credit under 
     paragraph (1) if--
       (A) the value of all or any portion of land referred to in 
     paragraph (1)(B) that would be subject to the credit has not 
     previously been credited to the non-Federal interest for a 
     project; and
       (B) the land was not acquired to meet any mitigation 
     requirement of the non-Federal interest.

     SEC. 4028. TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
     reduction in the vicinity of Twentynine Palms, California.

     SEC. 4029. YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction, Burnt Mountain basin, in the vicinity of Yucca 
     Valley, California.

     SEC. 4030. SELENIUM STUDIES, COLORADO.

       (a) In General.--The Director of the United States 
     Geological Survey, in consultation with State water quality 
     and resource and conservation agencies, shall conduct 
     regional and watershed-wide studies to address selenium 
     concentrations in the State of Colorado, including studies--
       (1) to measure selenium on specific sites; and
       (2) to determine whether specific selenium measures studied 
     should be recommended for use in demonstration projects.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

     SEC. 4031. DELAWARE AND CHRISTINA RIVERS AND SHELLPOT CREEK, 
                   WILMINGTON, DELAWARE.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction and related purposes along the Delaware and 
     Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, Delaware.

     SEC. 4032. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS AND TRIBUTARIES AND ATLANTIC 
                   COAST, DELAWARE.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of modifying the project for 
     navigation, Indian River Inlet and Bay, Delaware.
       (b) Factors for Consideration and Priority.--In carrying 
     out the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
       (1) take into consideration all necessary activities to 
     stabilize the scour holes threatening the Inlet and Bay 
     shorelines; and
       (2) give priority to stabilizing and restoring the Inlet 
     channel and scour holes adjacent to the United States Coast 
     Guard pier and helipad and the adjacent State-owned 
     properties.

     SEC. 4033. COLLIER COUNTY BEACHES, FLORIDA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for hurricane and storm 
     damage reduction and flood damage reduction in the vicinity 
     of Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and Naples beaches, Collier 
     County, Florida.

     SEC. 4034. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
     restoration, including improved water quality, and related 
     purposes, Lower St. Johns River, Florida.

     SEC. 4035. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL MAJOR 
                   REHABILITATION REPORT, FLORIDA.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall publish a 
     supplemental report to the major rehabilitation report for 
     the Herbert Hoover Dike system approved by the Chief of 
     Engineers in November 2000.
       (b) Inclusions.--The supplemental report under subsection 
     (a) shall include--
       (1) an evaluation of existing conditions at the Herbert 
     Hoover Dike system;
       (2) an identification of additional risks associated with 
     flood events at the system that are equal to or greater than 
     the standard projected flood risks;
       (3) an evaluation of the potential to integrate projects of 
     the Corps of Engineers into an enhanced flood protection 
     system for Lake Okeechobee, including--
       (A) the potential for additional water storage north of 
     Lake Okeechobee; and
       (B) an analysis of other project features included in the 
     Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan; and
       (4) a review of the report prepared for the South Florida 
     Water Management District dated April 2006.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,500,000.

     SEC. 4036. VANDERBILT BEACH LAGOON, FLORIDA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
     restoration, water supply, and improvement of water quality 
     at Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.

     SEC. 4037. MERIWETHER COUNTY, GEORGIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, 
     Meriwether County, Georgia.

     SEC. 4038. BOISE RIVER, IDAHO.

       The study for flood control, Boise River, Idaho, authorized 
     by section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 324), is modified--
       (1) to add ecosystem restoration and water supply as 
     project purposes to be studied; and
       (2) to require the Secretary to credit toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the study the cost, not to 
     exceed $500,000, of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
     to the project.

     SEC. 4039. BALLARD'S ISLAND SIDE CHANNEL, ILLINOIS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for ecosystem 
     restoration, Ballard's Island side channel, Illinois.

     SEC. 4040. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

       Section 425(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     2000 (114 Stat. 2638) is amended by inserting ``Lake Michigan 
     and'' before ``the Chicago River''.

     SEC. 4041. SALEM, INDIANA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project to provide an 
     additional water supply source for Salem, Indiana.

     SEC. 4042. BUCKHORN LAKE, KENTUCKY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of modifying the project for flood 
     damage reduction, Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky, authorized by 
     section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 
     1217), to add ecosystem restoration and recreation as project 
     purposes.
       (b) In-Kind Contributions.--The non-Federal interest may 
     provide the non-Federal share of the cost of the study in the 
     form of in-kind services and materials.

     SEC. 4043. DEWEY LAKE, KENTUCKY.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of modifying the project for Dewey Lake, 
     Kentucky, to add water supply as a project purpose.

     SEC. 4044. LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for 
     flood control, Louisville, Kentucky, authorized by section 4 
     of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to 
     investigate measures to address the rehabilitation of the 
     project.

     SEC. 4045. VIDALIA PORT, LOUISIANA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation 
     improvement at Vidalia, Louisiana.

     SEC. 4046. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of deepening that portion of the navigation 
     channel of the navigation project for Fall River Harbor, 
     Massachusetts and Rhode Island, authorized by section 101 of 
     the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), seaward of 
     the Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall River and 
     Somerset, Massachusetts.

     SEC. 4047. CLINTON RIVER, MICHIGAN.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
     restoration, Clinton River, Michigan.

     SEC. 4048. HAMBURG AND GREEN OAK TOWNSHIPS, MICHIGAN.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction on Ore Lake and the

[[Page 21793]]

     Huron River for Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.

     SEC. 4049. LAKE ERIE AT LUNA PIER, MICHIGAN.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for storm damage 
     reduction and other related purposes along Lake Erie at Luna 
     Pier, Michigan.

     SEC. 4050. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study and 
     prepare a report to evaluate the integrity of the bulkhead 
     system located on and in the vicinity of Duluth-Superior 
     Harbor, Duluth, Minnesota, and Superior, Wisconsin.
       (b) Contents.--The report shall include--
       (1) a determination of causes of corrosion of the bulkhead 
     system;
       (2) recommendations to reduce corrosion of the bulkhead 
     system;
       (3) a description of the necessary repairs to the bulkhead 
     system; and
       (4) an estimate of the cost of addressing the causes of the 
     corrosion and carrying out necessary repairs.

     SEC. 4051. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, 
     Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama and Mississippi, to 
     provide water supply for northeast Mississippi.

     SEC. 4052. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, NEW JERSEY.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project in the vicinity of the 
     Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, New Jersey, for the 
     construction of a dredged material disposal transfer facility 
     to make dredged material available for beneficial reuse.

     SEC. 4053. BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
     restoration, including improved water quality, enhanced 
     public access, and recreation, on the Kill Van Kull, Bayonne, 
     New Jersey.

     SEC. 4054. CARTERET, NEW JERSEY.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
     restoration, including improved water quality, enhanced 
     public access, and recreation, on the Raritan River, 
     Carteret, New Jersey.

     SEC. 4055. GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction, Gloucester County, New Jersey, including the 
     feasibility of restoring the flood protection dikes in 
     Gibbstown, New Jersey, and the associated tidegates in 
     Gloucester County, New Jersey.

     SEC. 4056. PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
     restoration and recreation on the Arthur Kill, Perth Amboy, 
     New Jersey.

     SEC. 4057. BATAVIA, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for hydropower and 
     related purposes in the vicinity of Batavia, New York.

     SEC. 4058. BIG SISTER CREEK, EVANS, NEW YORK.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
     damage reduction, Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
       (b) Evaluation of Potential Solutions.--In conducting the 
     study, the Secretary shall evaluate potential solutions to 
     flooding from all sources, including flooding that results 
     from ice jams.

     SEC. 4059. FINGER LAKES, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration and protection, Finger Lakes, New York, to 
     address water quality and aquatic nuisance species.

     SEC. 4060. LAKE ERIE SHORELINE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for storm damage 
     reduction and shoreline protection in the vicinity of 
     Gallagher Beach, Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York.

     SEC. 4061. NEWTOWN CREEK, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out ecosystem restoration 
     improvements on Newtown Creek, Brooklyn and Queens, New York.

     SEC. 4062. NIAGARA RIVER, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for a low-head 
     hydroelectric generating facility in the Niagara River, New 
     York.

     SEC. 4063. SHORE PARKWAY GREENWAY, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of 
     carrying out a project for shoreline protection in the 
     vicinity of the confluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, 
     Upper New York Bay, Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New 
     York.

     SEC. 4064. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NEW YORK.

       In accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a nonprofit organization may 
     serve, with the consent of the affected local government, as 
     the non-Federal interest for a study for the Upper Delaware 
     River watershed, New York, being carried out under Committee 
     Resolution 2495 of the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, adopted May 
     9, 1996.

     SEC. 4065. LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of existing water and 
     water quality-related infrastructure in Lincoln County, North 
     Carolina, to assist local interests in determining the most 
     efficient and effective way to connect county infrastructure.

     SEC. 4066. WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, 
     Wilkes County, North Carolina.

     SEC. 4067. YADKINVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, 
     Yadkinville, North Carolina.

     SEC. 4068. FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, OHIO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
     reduction in Cuyahoga, Lake, Ashtabula, Geauga, Erie, Lucas, 
     Sandusky, Huron, and Stark Counties, Ohio.

     SEC. 4069. LAKE ERIE, OHIO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out projects for power generation at 
     confined disposal facilities along Lake Erie, Ohio.

     SEC. 4070. OHIO RIVER, OHIO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
     reduction on the Ohio River in Mahoning, Columbiana, 
     Jefferson, Belmont, Noble, Monroe, Washington, Athens, Meigs, 
     Gallia, Lawrence, and Scioto Counties, Ohio.

     SEC. 4071. TOLEDO HARBOR DREDGED MATERIAL PLACEMENT, TOLEDO, 
                   OHIO.

       The Secretary shall study the feasibility of removing 
     previously dredged and placed materials from the Toledo 
     Harbor confined disposal facility, transporting the 
     materials, and disposing of the materials in or at abandoned 
     mine sites in southeastern Ohio.

     SEC. 4072. TOLEDO HARBOR, MAUMEE RIVER, AND LAKE CHANNEL 
                   PROJECT, TOLEDO, OHIO.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of constructing a project for 
     navigation, Toledo, Ohio.
       (b) Factors for Consideration.--In conducting the study 
     under subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into 
     consideration--
       (1) realigning the existing Toledo Harbor channel widening 
     occurring where the River Channel meets the Lake Channel from 
     the northwest to the southeast side of the River Channel;
       (2) realigning the entire 200-foot wide channel located at 
     the upper river terminus of the River Channel southern river 
     embankment towards the northern river embankment; and
       (3) adjusting the existing turning basin to accommodate 
     those changes.

     SEC. 4073. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE 
                   IMPROVEMENTS, OREGON.

       (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem 
     restoration and fish passage improvements on rivers 
     throughout the State of Oregon.
       (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
     shall--
       (1) work in coordination with the State of Oregon, local 
     governments, and other Federal agencies; and
       (2) place emphasis on--
       (A) fish passage and conservation and restoration 
     strategies to benefit species that are listed or proposed for 
     listing as threatened or endangered species under the 
     Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
       (B) other watershed restoration objectives.
       (c) Pilot Program.--
       (1) In general.--In conjunction with conducting the study 
     under subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out pilot 
     projects to demonstrate the effectiveness of ecosystem 
     restoration and fish passages.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this subsection.

     SEC. 4074. WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

       In conducting the study of determine the feasibility of 
     carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration, Walla Walla 
     River basin, Oregon, the Secretary shall--
       (1) credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     study the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
     to the project; and
       (2) allow the non-Federal interest to provide the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the study in the form of in-kind 
     services and materials.

     SEC. 4075. CHARTIERS CREEK WATERSHED, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction, Chartiers Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 4076. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for 
     flood control, Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Warren, 
     Pennsylvania, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control 
     Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570), and modified by section 
     2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1215), 
     section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941 (55 
     Stat. 646), and section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 
     December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887), to review operations of and 
     identify modifications to the project to expand recreational 
     opportunities.

     SEC. 4077. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of 
     structural and nonstructural flood

[[Page 21794]]

     damage reduction, stream bank protection, storm water 
     management, channel clearing and modification, and watershed 
     coordination measures in the Mahoning River basin, 
     Pennsylvania, the Allegheny River basin, Pennsylvania, and 
     the Upper Ohio River basin, Pennsylvania, to provide a level 
     of flood protection sufficient to prevent future losses to 
     communities located in such basins from flooding such as 
     occurred in September 2004, but not less than a 100-year 
     level of flood protection.
       (b) Priority Communities.--In carrying out this section, 
     the Secretary shall give priority to the following 
     Pennsylvania communities: Marshall Township, Ross Township, 
     Shaler Township, Jackson Township, Harmony, Zelienople, 
     Darlington Township, Houston Borough, Chartiers Township, 
     Washington, Canton Township, Tarentum Borough, and East Deer 
     Township.

     SEC. 4078. WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for 
     flood control, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, authorized by 
     section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 
     1570), to investigate measures to rehabilitate the project.

     SEC. 4079. YARDLEY BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction, at Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania, including the 
     alternative of raising River Road.

     SEC. 4080. RIO VALENCIANO, JUNCOS, PUERTO RICO.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     reevaluate the project for flood damage reduction and water 
     supply, Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico, authorized by 
     section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1197) 
     and section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 
     1828), to determine the feasibility of carrying out the 
     project.
       (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the study the cost of work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
     determines that the work is integral to the project.

     SEC. 4081. WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, BLACKSTONE 
                   RIVER BASIN, RHODE ISLAND.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study, and, not later than 
     June 30, 2008, submit to Congress a report that describes the 
     results of the study, on the flood damage reduction project, 
     Woonsocket, Blackstone River basin, Rhode Island, authorized 
     by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 
     (58 Stat. 892), to determine the measures necessary to 
     restore the level of protection of the project as originally 
     designed and constructed.

     SEC. 4082. CROOKED CREEK, BENNETTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, 
     Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina.

     SEC. 4083. BROAD RIVER, YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, Broad 
     River, York County, South Carolina.

     SEC. 4084. SAVANNAH RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out projects--
       (1) to improve the Savannah River for navigation and 
     related purposes that may be necessary to support the 
     location of container cargo and other port facilities to be 
     located in Jasper County, South Carolina, in the vicinity of 
     Mile 6 of the Savannah Harbor entrance channel; and
       (2) to remove from the proposed Jasper County port site the 
     easements used by the Corps of Engineers for placement of 
     dredged fill materials for the Savannah Harbor Federal 
     navigation project.
       (b) Factors for Consideration.--In making a determination 
     under subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into 
     consideration--
       (1) landside infrastructure;
       (2) the provision of any additional dredged material 
     disposal area as a consequence of removing from the proposed 
     Jasper County port site the easements used by the Corps of 
     Engineers for placement of dredged fill materials for the 
     Savannah Harbor Federal navigation project; and
       (3) the results of the proposed bistate compact between the 
     State of Georgia and the State of South Carolina to own, 
     develop, and operate port facilities at the proposed Jasper 
     County port site, as described in the term sheet executed by 
     the Governor of the State of Georgia and the Governor of the 
     State of South Carolina on March 12, 2007.

     SEC. 4085. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction, Chattanooga Creek, Dobbs Branch, Chattanooga, 
     Tennessee.

     SEC. 4086. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction, Cleveland, Tennessee.

     SEC. 4087. CUMBERLAND RIVER, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for recreation on, 
     riverbank protection for, and environmental protection of, 
     the Cumberland River and riparian habitats in the city of 
     Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee.

     SEC. 4088. LEWIS, LAWRENCE, AND WAYNE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for 
     Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee.

     SEC. 4089. WOLF RIVER AND NONCONNAH CREEK, MEMPHIS, 
                   TENNESSEE.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, in the 
     vicinity of Memphis, Tennessee, to include the repair, 
     replacement, rehabilitation, and restoration of the following 
     pumping stations: Cypress Creek, Nonconnah Creek, Ensley, 
     Marble Bayou, and Bayou Gayoso.

     SEC. 4090. ABILENE, TEXAS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, 
     Abilene, Texas.

     SEC. 4091. COASTAL TEXAS ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND 
                   RESTORATION, TEXAS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop a 
     comprehensive plan to determine the feasibility of carrying 
     out projects for flood damage reduction, hurricane and storm 
     damage reduction, and ecosystem restoration in the coastal 
     areas of the State of Texas.
       (b) Scope.--The comprehensive plan shall provide for the 
     protection, conservation, and restoration of wetlands, 
     barrier islands, shorelines, and related lands and features 
     that protect critical resources, habitat, and infrastructure 
     from the impacts of coastal storms, hurricanes, erosion, and 
     subsidence.
       (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term 
     ``coastal areas in the State of Texas'' means the coastal 
     areas of the State of Texas from the Sabine River on the east 
     to the Rio Grande River on the west and includes tidal 
     waters, barrier islands, marshes, coastal wetlands, rivers 
     and streams, and adjacent areas.

     SEC. 4092. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of 
     carrying out a project for dredged material disposal in the 
     vicinity of the project for navigation and environmental 
     restoration, Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas, 
     authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666).

     SEC. 4093. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for 
     Grand County and the city of Moab, Utah, including a review 
     of the impact of current and future demands on the Spanish 
     Valley Aquifer.

     SEC. 4094. SOUTHWESTERN UTAH.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction, Santa Clara River, Washington, Iron, and Kane 
     Counties, Utah.

     SEC. 4095. ECOSYSTEM AND HYDROPOWER GENERATION DAMS, VERMONT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
     potential to carry out ecosystem restoration and hydropower 
     generation at dams in the State of Vermont, including a 
     review of the report of the Secretary on the land and water 
     resources of the New England-New York region submitted to the 
     President on April 27, 1956 (published as Senate Document 
     Number 14, 85th Congress), and other relevant reports.
       (b) Purpose.--The purpose of the study under subsection (a) 
     shall be to determine the feasibility of providing water 
     resource improvements and small-scale hydropower generation 
     in the State of Vermont, including, as appropriate, options 
     for dam restoration, hydropower, dam removal, and fish 
     passage enhancement.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to carry out this section $500,000. Such sums shall remain 
     available until expended.

     SEC. 4096. ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON.

       (a) In General.--The study for rehabilitation of the 
     Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington, being carried out 
     under Committee Resolution 2704 of the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives adopted September 25, 2002, is modified to 
     include a determination of the feasibility of reducing future 
     damage to the seawall from seismic activity.
       (b) Acceptance of Contributions.--In carrying out the 
     study, the Secretary may accept contributions in excess of 
     the non-Federal share of the cost of the study from the non-
     Federal interest to the extent that the Secretary determines 
     that the contributions will facilitate completion of the 
     study.
       (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of any project authorized by law as 
     a result of the study the value of contributions accepted by 
     the Secretary under subsection (b).

     SEC. 4097. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
     protection projects in the watersheds of the Monongahela 
     River Basin lying within the counties of Hancock, Ohio, 
     Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, 
     Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, 
     Tucker, Mineral, Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, and Rithchie, West 
     Virginia.

     SEC. 4098. KENOSHA HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for

[[Page 21795]]

     navigation, Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin, including the 
     extension of existing piers.

     SEC. 4099. JOHNSONVILLE DAM, JOHNSONVILLE, WISCONSIN.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Johnsonville 
     Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin, to determine if the structure 
     prevents ice jams on the Sheboygan River.

     SEC. 4100. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction and environmental restoration, Menomonee River and 
     Underwood Creek, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, and greater Milwaukee 
     watersheds, Wisconsin.

     SEC. 4101. DEBRIS REMOVAL.

       (a) Evaluation.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 
     States, in coordination with the Secretary and the 
     Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and in 
     consultation with affected communities, shall conduct a 
     complete evaluation of Federal and non-Federal demolition, 
     debris removal, segregation, transportation, and disposal 
     practices relating to disaster areas designated in response 
     to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (including regulated and 
     nonregulated materials and debris).
       (2) Inclusions.--The evaluation under paragraph (1) shall 
     include a review of--
       (A) compliance with all applicable environmental laws;
       (B) permits issued or required to be issued with respect to 
     debris handling, transportation, storage, or disposal; and
       (C) administrative actions relating to debris removal and 
     disposal in the disaster areas described in paragraph (1).
       (b) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General, in 
     consultation with the Secretary and the Administrator, shall 
     submit to the Committee on the Environment and Public Works 
     of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report 
     that--
       (1) describes the findings of the Comptroller General with 
     respect to the evaluation under subsection (a);
       (2)(A) certifies compliance with all applicable 
     environmental laws; and
       (B) identifies any area in which a violation of such a law 
     has occurred or is occurring;
       (3) includes recommendations to ensure--
       (A) the protection of the environment;
       (B) sustainable practices; and
       (C) the integrity of hurricane and flood protection 
     infrastructure relating to debris disposal practices;
       (4) contains an enforcement plan that is designed to 
     prevent illegal dumping of hurricane debris in a disaster 
     area; and
       (5) contains plans of the Secretary and the Administrator 
     to involve the public and non-Federal interests, including 
     through the formation of a Federal advisory committee, as 
     necessary, to seek public comment relating to the removal, 
     disposal, and planning for the handling of post-hurricane 
     debris.
       (c) Restriction.--
       (1) In general.--No Federal funds may be used to pay for or 
     reimburse any State or local entity in Louisiana for the 
     disposal of construction and demolition debris generated as a 
     result of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 in a landfill designated 
     for construction and demolition debris as described in 
     section 257.2 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, 
     unless that waste meets the definition of construction and 
     demolition debris, as specified under Federal law and 
     described in that section on the date of enactment of this 
     Act.
       (2) Applicability.--The restriction in paragraph (1) shall 
     apply only to any disposal that occurs after the date of 
     enactment of this Act.
                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

     SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

       (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, 
     the Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the 
     following navigation channels and breakwaters constructed or 
     improved by the non-Federal interest if the Secretary 
     determines that such maintenance is economically justified 
     and environmentally acceptable and that the channel or 
     breakwater was constructed in accordance with applicable 
     permits and appropriate engineering and design standards:
       (1) Manatee Harbor basin, Florida.
       (2) Tampa Harbor, Sparkman Channel and Davis Island, 
     Florida.
       (3) West turning basin, Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
       (4) Bayou LaFourche Channel, Port Fourchon, Louisiana.
       (5) Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, Louisiana.
       (6) Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Industrial Park, 
     Memphis Harbor, Tennessee.
       (7) Houston Ship Channel, Bayport Cruise Channel and 
     Bayport Cruise turning basin, as part of the existing Bayport 
     Channel, Texas.
       (8) Pix Bayou Navigation Channel, Chambers County, Texas.
       (9) Jacintoport Channel at Houston Ship Channel, Texas.
       (10) Racine Harbor, Wisconsin.
       (b) Completion of Assessment.--Not later than 6 months 
     after the date of receipt of a request from a non-Federal 
     interest for Federal assumption of maintenance of a channel 
     listed in subsection (a), the Secretary shall make a 
     determination as provided in subsection (a) and advise the 
     non-Federal interest of the Secretary's determination.

     SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, 
     planning, and design assistance to non-Federal interests for 
     carrying out watershed management, restoration, and 
     development projects at the locations described in subsection 
     (d).
       (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under 
     subsection (a) may be in support of non-Federal projects for 
     the following purposes:
       (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
       (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
       (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, wetlands, and 
     other water bodies to their natural condition as a means to 
     control flooding, excessive erosion, and sedimentation.
       (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, including 
     urban watersheds.
       (5) Demonstration of technologies for nonstructural 
     measures to reduce destructive impacts of flooding.
       (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 25 
     percent.
       (d) Project Locations.--The locations referred to in 
     subsection (a) are the following:
       (1) Charlotte Harbor watershed, Florida.
       (2) Those portions of the watersheds of the Chattahoochee, 
     Etowah, Flint, Ocmulgee, and Oconee Rivers lying within the 
     counties of Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, 
     Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Forsyth, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, 
     Paulding, Rockdale, and Walton, Georgia.
       (3) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois.
       (4) Amite River basin, Louisiana.
       (5) East Atchafalaya River basin, Iberville Parish and 
     Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.
       (6) Red River watershed, Louisiana.
       (7) Taunton River basin, Massachusetts.
       (8) Marlboro Township, New Jersey.
       (9) Esopus, Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks, Greene, 
     Sullivan, and Ulster Counties, New York.
       (10) Greenwood Lake watershed, New York and New Jersey.
       (11) Long Island Sound watershed, New York.
       (12) Ramapo River watershed, New York.
       (13) Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio.
       (14) Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio.
       (15) Those portions of the watersheds of the Beaver, Upper 
     Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Allegheny, Kiskiminetas, Lower 
     Monongahela, Youghiogheny, Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers 
     lying within the counties of Beaver, Butler, Lawrence, and 
     Mercer, Pennsylvania.
       (16) Otter Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
       (17) Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township, Pennsylvania.
       (18) Sauk River basin, Washington.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

     SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY.

       (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to 
     enhance dam safety at the following locations:
       (1) Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho.
       (2) Keith Creek, Rockford, Illinois.
       (3) Mount Zion Mill Pond Dam, Fulton County, Indiana.
       (4) Hamilton Dam, Flint River, Flint, Michigan.
       (5) Congers Lake Dam, Rockland County, New York.
       (6) Lake Lucille Dam, New City, New York.
       (7) Peconic River Dams, town of Riverhead, Suffolk, Long 
     Island, New York.
       (8) Pine Grove Lakes Dam, Sloatsburg, New York.
       (9) State Dam, Auburn, New York.
       (10) Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New York.
       (11) Brightwood Dam, Concord Township, Ohio.
       (12) Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, Pennsylvania.
       (13) Leaser Lake Dam, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
       (14) Stillwater Dam, Monroe County, Pennsylvania.
       (15) Wissahickon Creek Dam, Montgomery County, 
     Pennsylvania.
       (b) Special Rule.--The assistance provided under subsection 
     (a) for State Dam, Auburn, New York, shall be for a project 
     for rehabilitation in accordance with the report on State Dam 
     Rehabilitation, Owasco Lake Outlet, New York, dated March 
     1999, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     feasible.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out subsection (a) $12,000,000.

     SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS.

       (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, 
     the Secretary shall evaluate the structural integrity and 
     effectiveness of a project for flood damage reduction and, if 
     the Secretary determines that the project does not meet such 
     minimum standards as the Secretary may establish and absent 
     action by the Secretary the project will fail, the Secretary 
     may take such action as may be necessary to restore the 
     integrity and effectiveness of the project.
       (b) Priority.--The Secretary shall carry out an evaluation 
     and take such actions as may be necessary under subsection 
     (a) for the project for flood damage reduction, Arkansas 
     River Levees, Arkansas.

     SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS.

       (a) In General.--Section 212(e) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332(e); 114 Stat. 2599) 
     is amended--
       (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraphs (23) and 
     (27);

[[Page 21796]]

       (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (28) and 
     inserting a semicolon; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(29) Ascension Parish, Louisiana;
       ``(30) East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana;
       ``(31) Iberville Parish, Louisiana;
       ``(32) Livingston Parish, Louisiana; and
       ``(33) Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.''.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 212(i)(1) of 
     such Act (33 U.S.C. 2332(i)(1)) is amended by striking 
     ``section--'' and all that follows before the period at the 
     end and inserting ``section $20,000,000''.

     SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.

       (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 
     Stat. 334) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (7);
       (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (8) and 
     inserting a semicolon; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(9) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(18);
       ``(10) $27,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(19);
       ``(11) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(20);
       ``(12) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(23);
       ``(13) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(25);
       ``(14) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(26);
       ``(15) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(27);
       ``(16) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(28); and
       ``(17) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(40).''.
       (b) East Arkansas Enterprise Community, Arkansas.--Federal 
     assistance made available under the rural enterprise zone 
     program of the Department of Agriculture may be used toward 
     payment of the non-Federal share of the costs of the project 
     described in section 219(c)(20) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-219) if such 
     assistance is authorized to be used for such purposes.

     SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CONSTRUCTION 
                   FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.

       The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports and, 
     if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
     shall expedite completion of construction for the following 
     projects:
       (1) Project for navigation, Whittier, Alaska.
       (2) Laguna Creek watershed flood damage reduction project, 
     California.
       (3) Daytona Beach shore protection project, Florida.
       (4) Flagler Beach shore protection project, Florida.
       (5) St. Johns County shore protection project, Florida.
       (6) Chenier Plain environmental restoration project, 
     Louisiana.
       (7) False River, Louisiana, being carried out under section 
     206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
     2330).
       (8) North River, Peabody, Massachusetts, being carried out 
     under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
     701s).
       (9) Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York, being 
     carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
       (10) Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York, being 
     carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
       (11) Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York, being 
     carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
       (12) Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, New York, 
     being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
       (13) Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney Point, New 
     York, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).
       (14) Chenango Lake, Chenango County, New York, being 
     carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).

     SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN 
                   PROJECTS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of 
     the reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary 
     determines that a project is justified in the completed 
     report, proceed directly to project preconstruction, 
     engineering, and design:
       (1) Project for water supply, Little Red River, Arkansas.
       (2) Watershed study, Fountain Creek, north of Pueblo, 
     Colorado.
       (3) Project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, 
     Florida.
       (4) Project for navigation, Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas 
     and Louisiana.
       (5) Project for ecosystem restoration, University Lake, 
     Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
       (b) Special Rule for Egmont Key, Florida.--In carrying out 
     the project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, 
     Florida, referred to in subsection (a)(3), the Secretary 
     shall waive any cost share to be provided by non-Federal 
     interests for any portion of the project that benefits 
     federally owned property.

     SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal 
     expense, an assessment of the water resources needs of the 
     river basins and watersheds of the southeastern United 
     States.
       (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out the 
     assessment, the Secretary may enter into cooperative 
     agreements with State and local agencies, non-Federal and 
     nonprofit entities, and regional researchers.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $7,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5010. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT 
                   PROJECT.

       Section 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 343; 117 Stat. 142) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)(2)(A) by adding at the end the 
     following: ``The Secretary shall ensure that such activities 
     are carried out throughout the geographic area that is 
     subject to the plan.'';
       (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
     (g) and (h), respectively;
       (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
       ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
     221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
     5b(b)), for any project or activity carried out under this 
     section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
     entity with the consent of the affected local government.'';
       (4) in subsection (g) (as redesignated by paragraph (2) of 
     this section) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(4) Non-federal share.--
       ``(A) In general.--The non-Federal share of the costs of 
     activities carried out under the plan may be provided--
       ``(i) in cash;
       ``(ii) by the provision of land, easements, rights-of-way, 
     relocations, or disposal areas;
       ``(iii) by in-kind services to implement the project; or
       ``(iv) by any combination thereof.
       ``(B) Private ownership.--Land needed for activities 
     carried out under the plan and credited toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of an activity may remain in 
     private ownership subject to easements that are--
       ``(i) satisfactory to the Secretary; and
       ``(ii) necessary to ensure achievement of the project 
     purposes.''; and
       (5) in subsection (h) (as redesignated by paragraph (2) of 
     this section) by striking ``for the period of fiscal years 
     2003 and 2004.'' and inserting ``per fiscal year through 
     fiscal year 2015.''.

     SEC. 5011. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 
                   PROGRAM.

       (a) Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration.--Section 
     506(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (42 
     U.S.C. 1962d-22(c)) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs 
     (3) and (4), respectively;
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
       ``(2) Reconnaissance studies.--Before planning, designing, 
     or constructing a project under paragraph (3), the Secretary 
     shall carry out a reconnaissance study--
       ``(A) to identify methods of restoring the fishery, 
     ecosystem, and beneficial uses of the Great Lakes; and
       ``(B) to determine whether planning of a project under 
     paragraph (3) should proceed.''; and
       (3) in paragraph (4)(A) (as redesignated by paragraph (1) 
     of this subsection) by striking ``paragraph (2)'' and 
     inserting ``paragraph (3)''.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--Section 506(f) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-22(f)) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (2)--
       (A) by striking ``The Federal share'' and inserting 
     ``Except for reconnaissance studies, the Federal share''; and
       (B) by striking ``(2) or (3)'' and inserting ``(3) or 
     (4)'';
       (2) in paragraph (3)--
       (A) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``subsection (c)(2)'' 
     and inserting ``subsection (c)(3)''; and
       (B) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``50 percent'' and 
     inserting ``100 percent''; and
       (3) in paragraph (5) by striking ``Notwithstanding'' and 
     inserting ``In accordance with''.

     SEC. 5012. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT 
                   REMEDIATION.

       Section 401(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1990 (33 U.S.C. 1268 note; 104 Stat. 4644; 114 Stat. 2613) is 
     amended by striking ``through 2006'' and inserting ``through 
     2012''.

     SEC. 5013. GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODELS.

       Section 516(g)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (33 U.S.C. 2326b(g)(2)) is amended by striking ``through 
     2006'' and inserting ``through 2012''.

     SEC. 5014. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION AND PROTECTION.

       (a) Great Lakes Navigation.--Using available funds, the 
     Secretary shall expedite the operation and maintenance, 
     including dredging, of the navigation features of the Great 
     Lakes and Connecting Channels for the purpose of supporting 
     commercial navigation to authorized project depths.
       (b) Great Lakes Pilot Project.--Using available funds, the 
     Director of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 
     in coordination with the Secretary, the Administrator of the 
     Environmental Protection Agency, the Commandant of the Coast 
     Guard, and the Director of the United States Fish and 
     Wildlife Service, shall carry out a pilot project, on an 
     emergency basis, to control and prevent further spreading of 
     viral hemorrhagic septicemia in the Great Lakes and 
     Connecting Channels.
       (c) Great Lakes and Connecting Channels Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``Great

[[Page 21797]]

     Lakes and Connecting Channels'' includes Lakes Superior, 
     Huron, Michigan, Erie, and Ontario, all connecting waters 
     between and among such lakes used for commercial navigation, 
     any navigation features in such lakes or waters that are a 
     Federal operation or maintenance responsibility, and areas of 
     the Saint Lawrence River that are operated or maintained by 
     the Federal Government for commercial navigation.

     SEC. 5015. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized, using amounts 
     contributed by the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 
     Corporation under subsection (b), to carry out projects for 
     operations, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation, 
     including associated maintenance dredging, of the Eisenhower 
     and Snell lock facilities and related navigational 
     infrastructure for the Saint Lawrence Seaway, at a total cost 
     of $134,650,000.
       (b) Source of Funds.--The Secretary is authorized to accept 
     funds from the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation 
     to carry out projects under this section. Such funds may 
     include amounts made available to the Corporation from the 
     Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund and the general fund of the 
     Treasury of the United States pursuant to section 210 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238).
       (c) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
     section authorizes the construction of any project to 
     increase the depth or width of the navigation channel to a 
     level greater than that previously authorized and existing on 
     the date of enactment of this Act or to increase the 
     dimensions of the Eisenhower and Snell lock facilities.

     SEC. 5016. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER DISPERSAL BARRIER PROJECT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
     appropriate Federal and State agencies, shall study, design, 
     and carry out a project to delay, deter, impede, or restrict 
     the dispersal of aquatic nuisance species into the northern 
     reaches of the Upper Mississippi River system. The Secretary 
     shall complete the study, design, and construction of the 
     project not later than 6 months after the date of enactment 
     of this Act.
       (b) Dispersal Barrier.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
     Secretary, at Federal expense, shall--
       (1) investigate and identify environmentally sound methods 
     for preventing and reducing the dispersal of aquatic nuisance 
     species through the northern reaches of the Upper Mississippi 
     River system;
       (2) use available technologies and measures;
       (3) monitor and evaluate, in cooperation with the Director 
     of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the 
     effectiveness of the project in preventing and reducing the 
     dispersal of aquatic nuisance species through the northern 
     reaches of the Upper Mississippi River system;
       (4) submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
     report on the results of the evaluation conducted under 
     paragraph (3); and
       (5) operate and maintain the project.
       (c) Requirement.--In conducting the study under subsection 
     (a), the Secretary shall take into consideration the 
     feasibility of locating the dispersal barrier at the lock 
     portion of the project at Lock and Dam 11 in the Upper 
     Mississippi River basin.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $4,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5017. ESTUARY RESTORATION.

       (a) Purposes.--Section 102 of the Estuary Restoration Act 
     of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2901) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting before the semicolon at 
     the end the following: ``by implementing a coordinated 
     Federal approach to estuary habitat restoration activities, 
     including the use of common monitoring standards and a common 
     system for tracking restoration acreage'';
       (2) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and implement'' after 
     ``to develop''; and
       (3) in paragraph (3) by inserting ``through cooperative 
     agreements'' after ``restoration projects''.
       (b) Definition of Estuary Habitat Restoration Plan.--
     Section 103(6)(A) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 
     U.S.C. 2902(6)(A)) is amended by striking ``Federal or 
     State'' and inserting ``Federal, State, or regional''.
       (c) Estuary Habitat Restoration Program.--Section 104 of 
     the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2903) is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``through the award of 
     contracts and cooperative agreements'' after ``assistance'';
       (2) in subsection (c)--
       (A) in paragraph (3)(A) by inserting ``or State'' after 
     ``Federal''; and
       (B) in paragraph (4)(B) by inserting ``or approach'' after 
     ``technology'';
       (3) in subsection (d)--
       (A) in paragraph (1)--
       (i) by striking ``Except'' and inserting the following:
       ``(A) In general.--Except''; and
       (ii) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(B) Monitoring.--
       ``(i) Costs.--The costs of monitoring an estuary habitat 
     restoration project funded under this title may be included 
     in the total cost of the estuary habitat restoration project.
       ``(ii) Goals.--The goals of the monitoring shall be--

       ``(I) to measure the effectiveness of the restoration 
     project; and

       ``(II) to allow adaptive management to ensure project 
     success.'';

       (B) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``or approach'' after 
     ``technology''; and
       (C) in paragraph (3) by inserting ``(including 
     monitoring)'' after ``services'';
       (4) in subsection (f)(1)(B) by inserting ``long-term'' 
     before ``maintenance''; and
       (5) in subsection (g)--
       (A) by striking ``In carrying'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) In general.--In carrying''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Small projects.--
       ``(A) Small project defined.--In this paragraph, the term 
     `small project' means a project carried out under this title 
     with an estimated Federal cost of less than $1,000,000.
       ``(B) Delegation of project implementation.--In carrying 
     out this section, the Secretary, on recommendation of the 
     Council, may delegate implementation of a small project to--
       ``(i) the Secretary of the Interior (acting through the 
     Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service);
       ``(ii) the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere of the 
     Department of Commerce;
       ``(iii) the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
     Agency; or
       ``(iv) the Secretary of Agriculture.
       ``(C) Funding.--A small project delegated to the head of a 
     Federal department or agency under this paragraph may be 
     carried out using funds appropriated to the department or 
     agency under section 109(a)(1) or other funds available to 
     the department or agency.
       ``(D) Agreements.--The head of a Federal department or 
     agency to which a small project is delegated under this 
     paragraph shall enter into an agreement with the non-Federal 
     interest for the project generally in conformance with the 
     criteria in subsections (d) and (e). Cooperative agreements 
     may be used for any delegated project to allow the non-
     Federal interest to carry out the project on behalf of the 
     Federal agency.''.
       (d) Establishment of Estuary Habitat Restoration Council.--
     Section 105(b) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 
     U.S.C. 2904(b)) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (4) by striking ``and'' after the 
     semicolon;
       (2) in paragraph (5) by striking the period at the end and 
     inserting a semicolon; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(6) cooperating in the implementation of the strategy 
     developed under section 106;
       ``(7) recommending standards for monitoring for restoration 
     projects and contribution of project information to the 
     database developed under section 107; and
       ``(8) otherwise using the respective authorities of the 
     Council members to carry out this title.''.
       (e) Monitoring of Estuary Habitat Restoration Projects.--
     Section 107(d) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 
     U.S.C. 2906(d)) is amended by striking ``compile'' and 
     inserting ``have general data compilation, coordination, and 
     analysis responsibilities to carry out this title and in 
     support of the strategy developed under this section, 
     including compilation of''.
       (f) Reporting.--Section 108(a) of the Estuary Restoration 
     Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2907(a)) is amended by striking ``At 
     the end of the third and fifth fiscal years following the 
     date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``Not later 
     than September 30, 2008, and every 2 years thereafter''.
       (g) Funding.--Section 109(a) of the Estuary Restoration Act 
     of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2908(a)) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1)--
       (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking 
     ``to the Secretary''; and
       (B) by striking subparagraphs (A) through (D) and inserting 
     the following:
       ``(A) to the Secretary, $25,000,000 for each of fiscal 
     years 2008 through 2012;
       ``(B) to the Secretary of the Interior (acting through the 
     Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service), 
     $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012;
       ``(C) to the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere of 
     the Department of Commerce, $2,500,000 for each of fiscal 
     years 2008 through 2012;
       ``(D) to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
     Agency, $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 
     2012; and
       ``(E) to the Secretary of Agriculture, $2,500,000 for each 
     of fiscal years 2008 through 2012.''; and
       (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (2)--
       (A) by inserting ``and other information compiled under 
     section 107'' after ``this title''; and
       (B) by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2012''.
       (h) General Provisions.--Section 110 of the Estuary 
     Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2909) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)(1)--
       (A) by inserting ``or contracts'' after ``agreements''; and
       (B) by inserting ``, nongovernmental organizations,'' after 
     ``agencies''; and
       (2) by striking subsections (d) and (e).

     SEC. 5018. MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MITIGATION, 
                   RECOVERY, AND RESTORATION, IOWA, KANSAS, 
                   MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, 
                   SOUTH DAKOTA, AND WYOMING.

       (a) Study.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee to be 
     established under subsection (b)(1), shall conduct a study of 
     the

[[Page 21798]]

     Missouri River and its tributaries to determine actions 
     required--
       (A) to mitigate losses of aquatic and terrestrial habitat;
       (B) to recover federally listed species under the 
     Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
       (C) to restore the ecosystem to prevent further declines 
     among other native species.
       (2) Funding.--The study to be conducted under paragraph (1) 
     shall be funded using amounts made available to carry out the 
     Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan authorized by 
     section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4143).
       (b) Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee.--
       (1) Establishment.--Not later than 6 months after the date 
     of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a 
     committee to be known as the Missouri River Recovery 
     Implementation Committee (in this section referred to as the 
     ``Committee'').
       (2) Membership.--The Committee shall include 
     representatives from--
       (A) Federal agencies;
       (B) States located near the Missouri River basin; and
       (C) other appropriate entities, as determined by the 
     Secretary, including--
       (i) water management and fish and wildlife agencies;
       (ii) Indian tribes located near the Missouri River basin; 
     and
       (iii) nongovernmental stakeholders, which may include--

       (I) navigation interests;
       (II) irrigation interests;
       (III) flood control interests;
       (IV) fish, wildlife, and conservation organizations;
       (V) recreation interests; and
       (VI) power supply interests.

       (3) Duties.--The Committee shall--
       (A) with respect to the study to be conducted under 
     subsection (a)(1), provide guidance to the Secretary and any 
     affected Federal agency, State agency, or Indian tribe; and
       (B) provide guidance to the Secretary with respect to the 
     Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan in existence on 
     the date of enactment of this Act, including recommendations 
     relating to--
       (i) changes to the implementation strategy from the use of 
     adaptive management;
       (ii) coordination of the development of consistent 
     policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, activities, 
     and priorities for the Missouri River recovery and mitigation 
     plan;
       (iii) exchange of information regarding programs, projects, 
     and activities of the agencies and entities represented on 
     the Committee to promote the goals of the Missouri River 
     recovery and mitigation plan;
       (iv) establishment of such working groups as the Committee 
     determines to be necessary to assist in carrying out the 
     duties of the Committee, including duties relating to public 
     policy and scientific issues;
       (v) facilitating the resolution of interagency and 
     intergovernmental conflicts between entities represented on 
     the Committee associated with the Missouri River recovery and 
     mitigation plan;
       (vi) coordination of scientific and other research 
     associated with the Missouri River recovery and mitigation 
     plan; and
       (vii) annual preparation of a work plan and associated 
     budget requests.
       (4) Recommendations and guidance.--In providing 
     recommendations and guidance from the Committee, the members 
     of the Committee may include dissenting opinions.
       (5) Compensation; travel expenses.--
       (A) Compensation.--Members of the Committee shall not 
     receive compensation from the Secretary in carrying out the 
     duties of the Committee under this section.
       (B) Travel expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by a member 
     of the Committee in carrying out the duties of the Committee 
     under this section shall not be eligible for Federal 
     reimbursement.
       (c) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory 
     Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the 
     Committee.

     SEC. 5019. SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC RIVER BASINS, 
                   DELAWARE, MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA.

       (a) Ex Officio Member.--Notwithstanding section 3001(a) of 
     the 1997 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for 
     Recovery From Natural Disasters, and for Overseas 
     Peacekeeping Efforts, Including Those in Bosnia (Public Law 
     105-18; 111 Stat. 176), section 2.2 of the Susquehanna River 
     Basin Compact to which consent was given by Public Law 91-575 
     (84 Stat. 1512), and section 2.2 of the Delaware River Basin 
     Compact to which consent was given by Public Law 87-328 (75 
     Stat. 691), beginning in fiscal year 2002, and each fiscal 
     year thereafter, the Division Engineer, North Atlantic 
     Division, Corps of Engineers--
       (1) shall be--
       (A) the ex officio United States member of the Susquehanna 
     River Basin Compact and the Delaware River Basin Compact; and
       (B) one of the 3 members appointed by the President under 
     the Potomac River Basin Compact to which consent was given by 
     Public Law 91-407 (84 Stat. 856);
       (2) shall serve without additional compensation; and
       (3) may designate an alternate member in accordance with 
     the terms of those compacts.
       (b) Authorization To Allocate.--The Secretary shall 
     allocate funds to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 
     Delaware River Basin Commission, and the Interstate 
     Commission on the Potomac River Basin to fulfill the 
     equitable funding requirements of the respective interstate 
     compacts.
       (c) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Delaware River 
     Basin.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
     agreement with the Delaware River Basin Commission to provide 
     temporary water supply and conservation storage at the 
     Francis E. Walter Dam, Pennsylvania, for any period during 
     which the Commission has determined that a drought warning or 
     drought emergency exists.
       (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
     for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
     shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated 
     with providing the storage.
       (d) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Susquehanna 
     River Basin.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
     agreement with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission to 
     provide temporary water supply and conservation storage at 
     Federal facilities operated by the Corps of Engineers in the 
     Susquehanna River basin for any period for which the 
     Commission has determined that a drought warning or drought 
     emergency exists.
       (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
     for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
     shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated 
     with providing the storage.
       (e) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Potomac River 
     Basin.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
     agreement with the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River 
     Basin to provide temporary water supply and conservation 
     storage at Federal facilities operated by the Corps of 
     Engineers in the Potomac River basin for any period for which 
     the Commission has determined that a drought warning or 
     drought emergency exists.
       (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
     for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
     shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated 
     with providing the storage.

     SEC. 5020. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND 
                   PROTECTION PROGRAM.

       (a) Form of Assistance.--Section 510(a)(2) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759) is amended 
     by striking ``, and beneficial uses of dredged material'' and 
     inserting ``, beneficial uses of dredged material, and 
     restoration of submerged aquatic vegetation''.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 510(i) of 
     such Act (110 Stat. 3761) is amended by striking 
     ``$10,000,000'' and inserting ``$40,000,000''.

     SEC. 5021. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RESTORATION, VIRGINIA AND 
                   MARYLAND.

       Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2263(b)) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4);
       (2) in paragraph (1)--
       (A) in the second sentence by striking ``$30,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$50,000,000''; and
       (B) in the third sentence by striking ``Such projects'' and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(2) Inclusions.--Such projects'';
       (3) by striking paragraph (2)(D) (as redesignated by 
     paragraph (2)(B) of this subsection) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(D) the restoration and rehabilitation of habitat for 
     fish, including native oysters, in the Chesapeake Bay and its 
     tributaries in Virginia and Maryland, including--
       ``(i) the construction of oyster bars and reefs;
       ``(ii) the rehabilitation of existing marginal habitat;
       ``(iii) the use of appropriate alternative substrate 
     material in oyster bar and reef construction;
       ``(iv) the construction and upgrading of oyster hatcheries; 
     and
       ``(v) activities relating to increasing the output of 
     native oyster broodstock for seeding and monitoring of 
     restored sites to ensure ecological success.
       ``(3) Restoration and rehabilitation activities.--The 
     restoration and rehabilitation activities described in 
     paragraph (2)(D) shall be--
       ``(A) for the purpose of establishing permanent sanctuaries 
     and harvest management areas; and
       ``(B) consistent with plans and strategies for guiding the 
     restoration of the Chesapeake Bay oyster resource and 
     fishery.''; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(5) Definition of ecological success.--In this 
     subsection, the term `ecological success' means--
       ``(A) achieving a tenfold increase in native oyster biomass 
     by the year 2010, from a 1994 baseline; and
       ``(B) the establishment of a sustainable fishery as 
     determined by a broad scientific and economic consensus.''.

     SEC. 5022. HYPOXIA ASSESSMENT.

       The Secretary may participate with Federal, State, and 
     local agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, regional 
     researchers, and other interested parties to assess hypoxia 
     in the Gulf of Mexico.

[[Page 21799]]



     SEC. 5023. POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AND TRIBUTARY 
                   STRATEGY EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM.

       The Secretary may participate in the Potomac River 
     watershed assessment and tributary strategy evaluation and 
     monitoring program to identify a series of resource 
     management indicators to accurately monitor the effectiveness 
     of the implementation of the agreed upon tributary strategies 
     and other public policies that pertain to natural resource 
     protection of the Potomac River watershed.

     SEC. 5024. LOCK AND DAM SECURITY.

       (a) Standards.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Tennessee Valley 
     Authority, and the Coast Guard, shall develop standards for 
     the security of locks and dams, including the testing and 
     certification of vessel exclusion barriers.
       (b) Site Surveys.--At the request of a lock or dam owner, 
     the Secretary shall provide technical assistance, on a 
     reimbursable basis, to improve lock or dam security.
       (c) Cooperative Agreement.--The Secretary may enter into a 
     cooperative agreement with a nonprofit alliance of public and 
     private organizations that has the mission of promoting safe 
     waterways and seaports to carry out testing and certification 
     activities, and to perform site surveys, under this section.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5025. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND 
                   SNAKE RIVER SALMON SURVIVAL.

       Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (16 U.S.C. 3301 note; 110 Stat. 3761; 113 Stat. 375) is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)(6) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$25,000,000''; and
       (2) in subsection (c)(2) by striking ``$1,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$10,000,000''.

     SEC. 5026. WAGE SURVEYS.

       Employees of the Corps of Engineers who are paid wages 
     determined under the last undesignated paragraph under the 
     heading ``Administrative Provisions'' of chapter V of the 
     Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1982 (5 U.S.C. 5343 note; 96 
     Stat. 832) shall be allowed, through appropriate employee 
     organization representatives, to participate in wage surveys 
     under such paragraph to the same extent as are prevailing 
     rate employees under subsection (c)(2) of section 5343 of 
     title 5, United States Code. Nothing in such section 5343 
     shall be construed to affect which agencies are to be 
     surveyed under such paragraph.

     SEC. 5027. REHABILITATION.

       The Secretary, at Federal expense and in an amount not to 
     exceed $1,000,000, shall rehabilitate and improve the water-
     related infrastructure and the transportation infrastructure 
     for the historic property in the Anacostia River watershed 
     located in the District of Columbia, including measures to 
     address wet weather conditions. To carry out this section, 
     the Secretary shall accept funds provided for such project 
     under any other Federal program.

     SEC. 5028. AUBURN, ALABAMA.

       The Secretary may provide technical assistance relating to 
     water supply to Auburn, Alabama. There is authorized to be 
     appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5029. PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA.

       (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall design and 
     construct the locally preferred plan for flood protection at 
     Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama. In carrying out the 
     project, the Secretary shall utilize, to the extent 
     practicable, the existing detailed project report for the 
     project prepared under the authority of section 205 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
       (b) Participation by Non-Federal Interest.--The Secretary 
     shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
     financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) 
     if the detailed project report evaluation indicates that 
     applying such section is necessary to implement the project.
       (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project.

     SEC. 5030. ALASKA.

       Section 570 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 369) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (c) by inserting ``environmental 
     restoration,'' after ``water supply and related 
     facilities,'';
       (2) in subsection (e)(3)(B) by striking the last sentence;
       (3) in subsection (h) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$45,000,000''; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
     221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
     5b(b)), for any project carried out under this section, a 
     non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity with the 
     consent of the affected local government.
       ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 
     percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section 
     may be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to 
     administer projects under this section at Federal expense.''.

     SEC. 5031. BARROW, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall carry out, under section 117 of the 
     Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 
     Stat. 2944), a nonstructural project for coastal erosion and 
     storm damage prevention and reduction at Barrow, Alaska, 
     including relocation of infrastructure.

     SEC. 5032. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA.

       (a) Long-Term Maintenance and Repair.--
       (1) Maintenance and repair.--The Secretary shall assume 
     responsibility for the long-term maintenance and repair of 
     the Lowell Creek tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
       (2) Duration of responsibilities.--The responsibility of 
     the Secretary for long-term maintenance and repair of the 
     tunnel shall continue until an alternative method of flood 
     diversion is constructed and operational under this section, 
     or 15 years after the date of enactment of this Act, 
     whichever is earlier.
       (b) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine whether an alternative method of flood diversion in 
     Lowell Canyon is feasible.
       (c) Construction.--
       (1) Alternative methods.--If the Secretary determines under 
     the study conducted under subsection (b) that an alternative 
     method of flood diversion in Lowell Canyon is feasible, the 
     Secretary shall carry out the alternative method.
       (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     carrying out an alternative method under paragraph (1) shall 
     be the same as the Federal share of the cost of the 
     construction of the Lowell Creek tunnel.

     SEC. 5033. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, 
     necessary removal of rubble, sediment, and rock impeding the 
     entrance to the St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, 
     Alaska, at a Federal cost of $2,000,000.

     SEC. 5034. TANANA RIVER, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, the 
     removal of the hazard to navigation on the Tanana River, 
     Alaska, near the mouth of the Chena River, as described in 
     the January 3, 2005, memorandum from the Commander, 
     Seventeenth Coast Guard District, to the Corps of Engineers, 
     Alaska District, Anchorage, Alaska.

     SEC. 5035. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA.

       (a) General Navigation Features.--In carrying out the 
     project for navigation, Wrangell Harbor, Alaska, authorized 
     by section 101(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), the Secretary shall consider the 
     dredging of the mooring basin and construction of the inner 
     harbor facilities to be general navigation features for 
     purposes of estimating the non-Federal share of project 
     costs.
       (b) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
     revise the partnership agreement for the project to reflect 
     the change required by subsection (a).

     SEC. 5036. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out rehabilitation 
     of authorized and completed levees on the White River between 
     Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas, at a total estimated cost of 
     $8,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,200,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,800,000.
       (b) Reimbursement.--After performing the rehabilitation 
     under subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek reimbursement 
     from the Secretary of the Interior of an amount equal to the 
     costs allocated to benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of 
     such rehabilitation.

     SEC. 5037. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS.

       The Secretary shall review the project for flood control, 
     Des Arc, Arkansas, to determine whether bank and channel 
     scour along the White River threaten the existing project and 
     whether the scour is a result of a design deficiency. If the 
     Secretary determines that such conditions exist as a result 
     of a deficiency, the Secretary shall carry out measures to 
     eliminate the deficiency.

     SEC. 5038. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the 
     vicinity of Loomis Landing, Arkansas, to determine if the 
     damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if 
     the Secretary determines that the damage is the result of a 
     Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a 
     project to mitigate the damage under section 111 of the River 
     and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i).

     SEC. 5039. CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in California.
       (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of design and construction 
     assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development projects in California, 
     including projects for wastewater treatment and related 
     facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
     environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
     protection and development.
       (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (d) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.

[[Page 21800]]

       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
     under this section--
       (i) shall be 75 percent; and
       (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
     reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is 
     the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest 
     incurred in providing the non-Federal share.
       (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project costs (including all reasonable 
     costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of the project on 
     publicly owned or controlled land), but the credit may not 
     exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity.
       (g) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
     of amounts made available to carry out this section may be 
     used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

     SEC. 5040. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND 
                   TRIBUTARIES, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--Unless the Secretary determines, by not 
     later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
     that the relocation of the portion of the project described 
     in subsection (b)(2) would be injurious to the public 
     interest, a non-Federal interest may reconstruct and relocate 
     that portion of the project approximately 300 feet in a 
     westerly direction.
       (b) Project Description.--
       (1) In general.--The project referred to in subsection (a) 
     is the project for flood control, Calaveras River and 
     Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, California, authorized by 
     section 10 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 
     Stat. 902).
       (2) Specific description.--The portion of the project to be 
     reconstructed and relocated is that portion consisting of 
     approximately 5.34 acres of dry land levee beginning at a 
     point N. 2203542.3167, E. 6310930.1385, thence running west 
     about 59.99 feet to a point N. 2203544.6562, E. 6310870.1468, 
     thence running south about 3,874.99 feet to a point N. 
     2199669.8760, E. 6310861.7956, thence running east about 
     60.00 feet to a point N. 2199668.8026, E. 6310921.7900, 
     thence running north about 3,873.73 feet to the point of 
     origin.
       (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     reconstructing and relocating the portion of the project 
     described in subsection (b)(2) shall be 100 percent.

     SEC. 5041. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA.

       Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``$10,300,000'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(A) In general.--$10,300,000'';
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project not to exceed $3,000,000 for the cost of planning and 
     design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
     project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project.''; and
       (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
     (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
     subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

     SEC. 5042. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, 
                   CALIFORNIA; MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 2000 (114 Stat. 2650) are each amended by adding at the 
     end the following: ``All planning, study, design, and 
     construction on the project shall be carried out by the 
     office of the district engineer, San Francisco, 
     California.''.

     SEC. 5043. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of the causes of water 
     quality degradation within Dana Point Harbor, California, to 
     determine if the degradation is the result of a Federal 
     navigation project, and, if the Secretary determines that the 
     degradation is the result of a Federal navigation project, 
     the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate the 
     degradation at Federal expense.

     SEC. 5044. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       Section 219(f)(22) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (113 Stat. 336) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(A) In general.--$25,000,000'';
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of design and construction work carried out 
     by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
     of the partnership agreement for the project.
       ``(C) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal interest may 
     provide any portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     the project in the form of in-kind services and materials.''; 
     and
       (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
     (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
     subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

     SEC. 5045. EASTERN SANTA CLARA BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

       Section 111(c) of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 
     2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106-554; 114 Stat. 
     2763A-224) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$28,000,000''; and
       (2) by striking ``$7,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$10,000,000''.

     SEC. 5046. LA-3 DREDGED MATERIAL OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE 
                   DESIGNATION, CALIFORNIA.

       The third sentence of section 102(c)(4) of the Marine 
     Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 
     1412(c)(4)) is amended by striking ``January 1, 2003'' and 
     inserting ``January 1, 2011''.

     SEC. 5047. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA.

       Section 219(f)(50) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
       (1) by inserting after ``water'' the following: ``and 
     wastewater''; and
       (2) by striking ``$14,500,000'' and inserting 
     ``$24,500,000''.

     SEC. 5048. LOS OSOS, CALIFORNIA.

       Section 219(c)(27) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-219) is amended to read as follows:
       ``(27) Los osos, california.--Wastewater infrastructure, 
     Los Osos, California.''.

     SEC. 5049. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Cooperative Program.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall participate with 
     appropriate State and local agencies in the implementation of 
     a cooperative program to improve and manage fisheries and 
     aquatic habitat conditions in Pine Flat Reservoir and in the 
     14-mile reach of the Kings River immediately below Pine Flat 
     Dam, California, in a manner that--
       (A) provides for long-term aquatic resource enhancement; 
     and
       (B) avoids adverse effects on water storage and water 
     rights holders.
       (2) Goals and principles.--The cooperative program 
     described in paragraph (1) shall be carried out--
       (A) substantially in accordance with the goals and 
     principles of the document entitled ``Kings River Fisheries 
     Management Program Framework Agreement'' and dated May 29, 
     1999, between the California department of fish and game and 
     the Kings River Water Association and the Kings River 
     Conservation District; and
       (B) in cooperation with the parties to that agreement.
       (b) Participation by Secretary.--
       (1) In general.--In furtherance of the goals of the 
     agreement described in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall 
     participate in the planning, design, and construction of 
     projects and pilot projects on the Kings River and its 
     tributaries to enhance aquatic habitat and water availability 
     for fisheries purposes (including maintenance of a trout 
     fishery) in accordance with flood control operations, water 
     rights, and beneficial uses in existence as of the date of 
     enactment of this Act.
       (2) Projects.--Projects referred to in paragraph (1) may 
     include--
       (A) projects to construct or improve pumping, conveyance, 
     and storage facilities to enhance water transfers; and
       (B) projects to carry out water exchanges and create 
     opportunities to use floodwater within and downstream of Pine 
     Flat Reservoir.
       (c) No Authorization of Certain Dam-Related Projects.--
     Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize any 
     project for the raising of Pine Flat Dam or the construction 
     of a multilevel intake structure at Pine Flat Dam.
       (d) Use of Existing Studies.--In carrying out this section, 
     the Secretary shall use, to the

[[Page 21801]]

     maximum extent practicable, studies in existence on the date 
     of enactment of this Act, including data and environmental 
     documentation in the document entitled ``Final Feasibility 
     Report and Report of the Chief of Engineers for Pine Flat Dam 
     Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration'' and dated July 19, 
     2002.
       (e) Credit for Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--The 
     Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of construction of any project under subsection (b) the 
     value, regardless of the date of acquisition, of any land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, or 
     relocations provided by the non-Federal interest for use in 
     carrying out the project.
       (f) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation, maintenance, 
     repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of projects carried 
     out under this section shall be a non-Federal responsibility.
       (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000. 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.

     SEC. 5050. RAYMOND BASIN, SIX BASINS, CHINO BASIN, AND SAN 
                   GABRIEL BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation and 
     coordination with appropriate Federal, State, and local 
     entities, shall develop a comprehensive plan for the 
     management of water resources in the Raymond Basin, Six 
     Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel Basin, California. The 
     Secretary may carry out activities identified in the 
     comprehensive plan to demonstrate practicable alternatives 
     for water resources management.
       (b) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     the cost of operation and maintenance of any measures 
     constructed under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

     SEC. 5051. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     Port of San Francisco, California, may carry out the project 
     for repair and removal, as appropriate, of Piers 30-32, 35, 
     36, 70 (including Wharves 7 and 8), and 80 in San Francisco, 
     California, substantially in accordance with the Port's 
     redevelopment plan.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to 
     be appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5052. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA.

       (a) Area to Be Declared Nonnavigable; Public Interest.--
     Unless the Secretary finds, after consultation with local and 
     regional public officials (including local and regional 
     public planning organizations), that the proposed projects to 
     be undertaken within the boundaries of the portion of the San 
     Francisco, California, waterfront area described in 
     subsection (b) are not in the public interest, such portion 
     is declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States.
       (b) Northern Embarcadero South of Bryant Street.--The 
     portion of the San Francisco, California, waterfront area 
     referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Beginning at the 
     intersection of the northeasterly prolongation of that 
     portion of the northwesterly line of Bryant Street lying 
     between Beale Street and Main Street with the southwesterly 
     line of Spear Street, which intersection lies on the line of 
     jurisdiction of the San Francisco Port Commission; following 
     thence southerly along said line of jurisdiction as described 
     in the State of California Harbor and Navigation Code Section 
     1770, as amended in 1961, to its intersection with the 
     southeasterly line of Townsend Street; thence northeasterly 
     along said southeasterly line of Townsend Street, to its 
     intersection with a line that is parallel and distant 10 feet 
     southerly from the existing southern boundary of Pier 40 
     produced; thence easterly along said parallel line, to its 
     point of intersection with the United States Government 
     Pierhead line; thence northerly along said Pierhead line to 
     its intersection with a line parallel with, and distant 10 
     feet easterly from, the existing easterly boundary line of 
     Pier 30-32; thence northerly along said parallel line and its 
     northerly prolongation, to a point of intersection with a 
     line parallel with, and distant 10 feet northerly from, the 
     existing northerly boundary of Pier 30-32; thence westerly 
     along last said parallel line to its intersection with the 
     United States Government Pierhead line; thence northerly 
     along said Pierhead line, to its intersection aforementioned 
     northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced northeasterly; 
     thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line of Bryant 
     Street produced to the point of beginning.
       (c) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--The declaration of 
     nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies only to those 
     parts of the area described in subsection (b) that are or 
     will be bulkheaded, filled, or otherwise occupied by 
     permanent structures and does not affect the applicability of 
     any Federal statute or regulation applicable to such parts 
     the day before the date of enactment of this Act, including 
     sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 
     and 403; 30 Stat. 1151), commonly known as the Rivers and 
     Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899, section 404 of the Federal 
     Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and the 
     National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
     seq.).
       (d) Expiration Date.--If, 20 years from the date of 
     enactment of this Act, any area or part thereof described in 
     subsection (b) is not bulkheaded or filled or occupied by 
     permanent structures, including marina facilities, in 
     accordance with the requirements set out in subsection (c), 
     or if work in connection with any activity permitted in 
     subsection (c) is not commenced within 5 years after issuance 
     of such permits, then the declaration of nonnavigability for 
     such area or part thereof shall expire.

     SEC. 5053. SAN PABLO BAY, CALIFORNIA, WATERSHED AND SUISUN 
                   MARSH ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

       (a) San Pablo Bay Watershed, California.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall complete work, as 
     expeditiously as possible, on the ongoing San Pablo Bay 
     watershed, California, study to determine the feasibility of 
     opportunities for restoring, preserving, and protecting the 
     San Pablo Bay watershed.
       (2) Report.--Not later than March 31, 2008, the Secretary 
     shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
     study.
       (b) Suisun Marsh, California.--The Secretary shall conduct 
     a comprehensive study to determine the feasibility of 
     opportunities for restoring, preserving, and protecting the 
     Suisun Marsh, California.
       (c) San Pablo and Suisun Bay Marsh Watershed Critical 
     Restoration Projects.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in critical 
     restoration projects that will produce, consistent with 
     Federal programs, projects, and activities, immediate and 
     substantial ecosystem restoration, preservation, and 
     protection benefits in the following sub-watersheds of the 
     San Pablo and Suisun Bay Marsh watersheds:
       (A) The tidal areas of the Petaluma River, Napa-Sonoma 
     Marsh.
       (B) The shoreline of West Contra Costa County.
       (C) Novato Creek.
       (D) Suisun Marsh.
       (E) Gallinas-Miller Creek.
       (2) Types of assistance.--Participation in critical 
     restoration projects under this subsection may include 
     assistance for planning, design, or construction.
       (d) Credit.--In accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the Secretary shall 
     credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     construction of a project under this section--
       (1) the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
     dredged material disposal areas, or relocations provided by 
     the non-Federal interest for carrying out the project, 
     regardless of the date of acquisition;
       (2) funds received from the CALFED Bay-Delta program; and
       (3) the cost of the studies, design, and construction work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

     SEC. 5054. ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may construct a project for 
     flood control and environmental restoration, St. Helena, 
     California, substantially in accordance with the plan for the 
     St. Helena comprehensive flood protection project dated 2006 
     and described in the addendum dated June 27, 2006, to the 
     report prepared by the city of St. Helena entitled ``City of 
     St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Protection Project, Final 
     Environmental Impact Report'', and dated January 2004, if the 
     Secretary determines that the plans and designs for the 
     project are feasible.
       (b) Cost.--The total cost of the project to be constructed 
     pursuant to subsection (a) shall be $30,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $10,500,000.
       (c) Reimbursement.--The non-Federal interest shall be 
     reimbursed for any work performed by the non-Federal interest 
     for the project described in subsection (a) that is in excess 
     of the required non-Federal contribution toward the total 
     cost of the project, if the Secretary determines that the 
     work is integral to the project.

     SEC. 5055. UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Reevaluation.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the 
     feasibility of the Lower Mosher Slough element and the levee 
     extensions on the Upper Calaveras River element of the 
     project for flood control, Stockton Metropolitan Area, 
     California, carried out under section 211(f)(3) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3683), to 
     determine the eligibility of such elements for reimbursement 
     under section 211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
       (b) Special Rules for Reevaluation.--In conducting the 
     reevaluation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall not 
     reject a feasibility determination based on one or more of 
     the policies of the Corps of Engineers concerning the 
     frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and the amount of 
     runoff.
       (c) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary determines that the 
     elements referred to subsection (a) are feasible, the 
     Secretary shall reimburse, subject to appropriations, the 
     non-Federal interest under section 211 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 for the Federal share of the cost of 
     such elements.

     SEC. 5056. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, 
                   COLORADO, NEW MEXICO, AND TEXAS.

       (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       (1) Rio grande compact.--The term ``Rio Grande Compact'' 
     means the compact approved by Congress under the Act of May 
     31, 1939 (53 Stat. 785), and ratified by the States.

[[Page 21802]]

       (2) Rio grande basin.--The term ``Rio Grande Basin'' means 
     the Rio Grande (including all tributaries and their 
     headwaters) located--
       (A) in the State of Colorado, from the Rio Grande 
     Reservoir, near Creede, Colorado, to the New Mexico State 
     border;
       (B) in the State of New Mexico, from the Colorado State 
     border downstream to the Texas State border; and
       (C) in the State of Texas, from the New Mexico State border 
     to the southern terminus of the Rio Grande at the Gulf of 
     Mexico.
       (3) States.--The term ``States'' means the States of 
     Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas.
       (b) Program Authority.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, in the Rio 
     Grande Basin--
       (A) a program for the planning, construction, and 
     evaluation of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
     rehabilitation and enhancement; and
       (B) implementation of a long-term monitoring, computerized 
     data inventory and analysis, applied research, and adaptive 
     management program.
       (2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2008, and not 
     later than December 31 of every sixth year thereafter, the 
     Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior 
     and the States, shall submit to Congress a report that--
       (A) contains an evaluation of the programs described in 
     paragraph (1);
       (B) describes the accomplishments of each program;
       (C) provides updates of a systemic habitat needs 
     assessment; and
       (D) identifies any needed adjustments in the authorization 
     of the programs.
       (c) State and Local Consultation and Cooperative Effort.--
     For the purpose of ensuring the coordinated planning and 
     implementation of the programs described in subsection (b), 
     the Secretary shall--
       (1) consult with the States, and other appropriate entities 
     in the States, the rights and interests of which might be 
     affected by specific program activities; and
       (2) enter into an interagency agreement with the Secretary 
     of the Interior to provide for the direct participation of, 
     and transfer of funds to, the United States Fish and Wildlife 
     Service and any other agency or bureau of the Department of 
     the Interior for the planning, design, implementation, and 
     evaluation of those programs.
       (d) Operation and Maintenance.--The costs of operation and 
     maintenance of a project located on Federal land, or land 
     owned or operated by a State or local government, shall be 
     borne by the Federal, State, or local agency that has 
     jurisdiction over fish and wildlife activities on the land.
       (e) Effect on Other Law.--
       (1) Water law.--Nothing in this section shall be construed 
     to preempt any State water law.
       (2) Compacts and decrees.--In carrying out this section, 
     the Secretary shall comply with the Rio Grande Compact, and 
     any applicable court decrees or Federal and State laws, 
     affecting water or water rights in the Rio Grande Basin.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section 
     $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2011.

     SEC. 5057. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, NEW HAVEN 
                   HARBOR, CONNECTICUT.

       The western breakwater for the project for navigation, New 
     Haven Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of 
     the Act of September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 428), shall be known 
     and designated as the ``Charles Hervey Townshend 
     Breakwater''.

     SEC. 5058. STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
     ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, 
     and recreation components of the Mill River and Long Island 
     Sound revitalization project, Stamford, Connecticut.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5059. DELMARVA CONSERVATION CORRIDOR, DELAWARE, 
                   MARYLAND, AND VIRGINIA.

       (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical 
     assistance to the Secretary of Agriculture for use in 
     carrying out the Conservation Corridor Demonstration Program 
     established under subtitle G of title II of the Farm Security 
     and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 note; 116 
     Stat. 275).
       (b) Coordination and Integration.--In carrying out water 
     resources projects in the States on the Delmarva Peninsula, 
     the Secretary shall coordinate and integrate those projects, 
     to the maximum extent practicable, with any activities 
     carried out to implement a conservation corridor plan 
     approved by the Secretary of Agriculture under section 2602 
     of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (16 
     U.S.C. 3801 note; 116 Stat. 275).

     SEC. 5060. ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND 
                   MARYLAND.

       (a) Comprehensive Action Plan.--Not later than one year 
     after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in 
     coordination with the Mayor of the District of Columbia, the 
     Governor of Maryland, the county executives of Montgomery 
     County and Prince George's County, Maryland, and other 
     interested entities, shall develop and make available to the 
     public a 10-year comprehensive action plan to provide for the 
     restoration and protection of the ecological integrity of the 
     Anacostia River and its tributaries.
       (b) Public Availability.--On completion of the 
     comprehensive action plan under subsection (a), the Secretary 
     shall make the plan available to the public, including on the 
     Internet.

     SEC. 5061. EAST CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST FLORIDA.

       (a) East Central and Northeast Florida Region Defined.--In 
     this section, the term ``East Central and Northeast Florida 
     Region'' means Flagler County, St. Johns County, Putman 
     County (east of the St. Johns River), Seminole County, 
     Volusia County, the towns of Winter Park, Maitland, and 
     Palatka, Florida.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in the East Central and Northeast Florida Region.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of design and construction 
     assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development projects in the East 
     Central and Northeast Florida Region, including projects for 
     wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and 
     related facilities, environmental restoration, and surface 
     water resource protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
     under this section--
       (i) shall be 75 percent; and
       (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
     reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is 
     the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest 
     incurred in providing the non-Federal share.
       (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project costs (including all reasonable 
     costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of the project on 
     publicly owned or controlled land), but the credit may not 
     exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of 
     the affected local government.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
     of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
     used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

     SEC. 5062. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS.

       Section 109 of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 
     (enacted into law by Public Law 106-554) (114 Stat. 2763A-
     222) is amended--
       (1) by adding at the end of subsection (e)(2) the 
     following:
       ``(C) Credit for work prior to execution of the partnership 
     agreement.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of the project--
       ``(i) in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the cost of construction 
     work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project; 
     and
       ``(ii) the cost of land acquisition carried out by the non-
     Federal interest for projects to be carried out under this 
     section.''; and
       (2) in subsection (f) by striking ``$100,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$100,000,000, of which not more than $15,000,000 
     may be used to provide planning, design, and construction 
     assistance to the

[[Page 21803]]

     Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority for a water treatment plant, 
     Florida City, Florida''.

     SEC. 5063. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA.

       The Secretary may carry out necessary repairs for the Lake 
     Worth bulkhead replacement project, West Palm Beach, Florida, 
     at an estimated total cost of $9,000,000.

     SEC. 5064. BIG CREEK, GEORGIA, WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND 
                   RESTORATION PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with, by 
     providing technical, planning, and construction assistance 
     to, the city of Roswell, Georgia, as the non-Federal interest 
     and coordinator with other local governments in the Big Creek 
     watershed, Georgia, to assess the quality and quantity of 
     water resources, conduct comprehensive watershed management 
     planning, develop and implement water efficiency technologies 
     and programs, and plan, design, and construct water resource 
     facilities to restore the watershed.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to the Secretary $5,000,000 to carry out 
     this section.

     SEC. 5065. METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING 
                   DISTRICT.

       (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall 
     establish a program to provide environmental assistance to 
     non-Federal interests in the Metropolitan North Georgia Water 
     Planning District.
       (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of design and construction 
     assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development projects in north 
     Georgia, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
     related facilities, elimination or control of combined sewer 
     overflows, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
     restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
     development.
       (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (d) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
     under this section--
       (i) shall be 75 percent; and
       (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
     reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of a project under this section, in an amount not to 
     exceed 6 percent of the total construction costs of the 
     project, the cost of design work carried out by the non-
     Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is 
     the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest 
     incurred in providing the non-Federal share.
       (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project costs (including all reasonable 
     costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of the project on 
     publicly owned or controlled land), but the credit may not 
     exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.

     SEC. 5066. SAVANNAH, GEORGIA.

       (a) In General.--After completion of a Savannah Riverfront 
     plan, the Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
     restoration, recreation, navigation, and flood damage 
     reduction components of the plan.
       (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the 
     Secretary shall coordinate with appropriate representatives 
     in the vicinity of Savannah, Georgia, including the Georgia 
     Ports Authority, the city of Savannah, and Camden County.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL 
                   UTAH, AND WYOMING.

       Section 595 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 
     118 Stat. 440) is amended--
       (1) in the section heading by striking ``AND RURAL UTAH'' 
     and inserting ``RURAL UTAH, AND WYOMING'';
       (2) in subsections (b) and (c) by striking ``and rural 
     Utah'' each place it appears and inserting ``rural Utah, and 
     Wyoming''; and
       (3) by striking subsection (h) and inserting the following:
       ``(h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section for the period 
     beginning with fiscal year 2001 $150,000,000 for rural 
     Nevada, $25,000,000 for each of Montana and New Mexico, 
     $55,000,000 for Idaho, $50,000,000 for rural Utah, and 
     $30,000,000 for Wyoming. Such sums shall remain available 
     until expended.''.

     SEC. 5068. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO.

       The Secretary is authorized to carry out the Riley Creek 
     Recreation Area Operation Plan of the Albeni Falls Management 
     Plan, dated October 2001, for the Riley Creek Recreation 
     Area, Albeni Falls Dam, Bonner County, Idaho.

     SEC. 5069. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, CHICAGO, 
                   ILLINOIS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for 
     a project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood 
     inundation areas along the Little Calumet River, Chicago, 
     Illinois.
       (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall 
     include hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall 
     accurately show the flood inundation of each property by 
     flood risk in the floodplain. The maps shall be produced in a 
     high resolution format and shall be made available to all 
     flood prone areas along the Little Calumet River, Chicago, 
     Illinois, in an electronic format.
       (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-
     Federal interests for the project shall work with the 
     Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 
     ensure the validity of the maps developed under the project 
     for flood insurance purposes.
       (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
     Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements 
     with the non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of 
     project costs.
       (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
     project shall be 50 percent.
       (f) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
     section shall be construed to modify the prioritization of 
     map updates or the substantive requirements of the Federal 
     Emergency Management Agency flood map modernization program 
     authorized by section 1360 of the National Flood Insurance 
     Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101).
       (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000.

     SEC. 5070. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI FLOOD 
                   PROTECTION PROJECTS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
     reconstruction of an eligible flood control project if the 
     Secretary determines that such reconstruction is not required 
     as a result of improper operation and maintenance of the 
     project by the non-Federal interest.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the costs for 
     the reconstruction of a flood control project authorized by 
     this section shall be the same non-Federal share that was 
     applicable to construction of the project. The non-Federal 
     interest shall be responsible for operation and maintenance 
     and repair of a project for which reconstruction is 
     undertaken under this section.
       (c) Reconstruction Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``reconstruction'', as used with respect to a project, means 
     addressing major project deficiencies caused by long-term 
     degradation of the foundation, construction materials, or 
     engineering systems or components of the project, the results 
     of which render the project at risk of not performing in 
     compliance with its authorized project purposes. In 
     addressing such deficiencies, the Secretary may incorporate 
     current design standards and efficiency improvements, 
     including the replacement of obsolete mechanical and 
     electrical components at pumping stations, if such 
     incorporation does not significantly change the scope, 
     function, and purpose of the project as authorized.
       (d) Eligible Projects.--The following flood control 
     projects are eligible for reconstruction under this section:
       (1) Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
       (2) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District, 
     Illinois.
       (3) Prairie Du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, including 
     Fish Lake Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
       (4) Cairo, Illinois Mainline Levee, Cairo, Illinois.
       (5) Goose Pond Pump Station, Cairo, Illinois.
       (6) Cottonwood Slough Pump Station, Alexander County, 
     Illinois.
       (7) 10th and 28th Street Pump Stations, Cairo, Illinois.
       (8) Flood control levee projects in Brookport, Shawneetown, 
     Old Shawneetown, Golconda, Rosiclare, Harrisburg, and 
     Reevesville, Illinois.
       (9) City of St. Louis, Missouri.
       (10) Missouri River Levee Drainage District, Missouri.

[[Page 21804]]

       (e) Justification.--The reconstruction of a project 
     authorized by this section shall not be considered a 
     separable element of the project.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5071. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.

       (a) Extension of Authorization.--Section 519(c)(2) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2654) is 
     amended by striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2010''.
       (b) Maximum Federal Share.--Section 519(c)(3) of such Act 
     (114 Stat. 2654) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$20,000,000''.
       (c) In-Kind Services.--Section 519(g)(3) of such Act (114 
     Stat. 2655) is amended by inserting before the period at the 
     end of the first sentence ``if such services are provided not 
     more than 5 years before the date of initiation of the 
     project or activity''.
       (d) Monitoring.--Section 519 of such Act (114 Stat. 2654) 
     is amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(h) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall develop an Illinois 
     River basin monitoring program to support the plan developed 
     under subsection (b). Data collected under the monitoring 
     program shall incorporate data provided by the State of 
     Illinois and shall be publicly accessible through electronic 
     means, including on the Internet.''.

     SEC. 5072. PROMONTORY POINT THIRD-PARTY REVIEW, CHICAGO 
                   SHORELINE, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

       (a) Review.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a third-party 
     review of the Promontory Point feature of the project for 
     storm damage reduction and shoreline erosion protection, Lake 
     Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois-
     Indiana State line, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), at 
     a cost not to exceed $450,000.
       (2) Joint review.--The Buffalo and Seattle Districts of the 
     Corps of Engineers shall jointly conduct the review under 
     paragraph (1).
       (3) Standards.--The review under paragraph (1) shall be 
     based on the standards under part 68 of title 36, Code of 
     Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).
       (b) Contributions.--The Secretary may accept funds from a 
     State or political subdivision of a State to conduct the 
     review under paragraph (1).
       (c) Treatment.--The review under paragraph (1) shall not be 
     considered to be an element of the project referred to in 
     paragraph (1).
       (d) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section shall be 
     construed to affect the authorization for the project 
     referred to in paragraph (1).

     SEC. 5073. KASKASKIA RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, RESTORATION.

       (a) Kaskaskia River Basin Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``Kaskaskia River Basin'' means the Kaskaskia River, 
     Illinois, its backwaters, its side channels, and all 
     tributaries, including their watersheds, draining into the 
     Kaskaskia River.
       (b) Comprehensive Plan.--
       (1) Development.--The Secretary shall develop, as 
     expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan for the 
     purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the 
     Kaskaskia River Basin.
       (2) Technologies and innovative approaches.--The 
     comprehensive plan shall provide for the development of new 
     technologies and innovative approaches--
       (A) to enhance the Kaskaskia River as a transportation 
     corridor;
       (B) to improve water quality within the entire Kaskaskia 
     River Basin;
       (C) to restore, enhance, and preserve habitat for plants 
     and wildlife;
       (D) to ensure aquatic integrity of side channels and 
     backwaters and their connectivity with the mainstem river;
       (E) to increase economic opportunity for agriculture and 
     business communities; and
       (F) to reduce the impacts of flooding to communities and 
     landowners.
       (3) Specific components.--The comprehensive plan shall 
     include such features as are necessary to provide for--
       (A) the development and implementation of a program for 
     sediment removal technology, sediment characterization, 
     sediment transport, and beneficial uses of sediment;
       (B) the development and implementation of a program for the 
     planning, conservation, evaluation, and construction of 
     measures for fish and wildlife habitat conservation and 
     rehabilitation, and stabilization and enhancement of land and 
     water resources in the Kaskaskia River Basin;
       (C) the development and implementation of a long-term 
     resource monitoring program for the Basin;
       (D) a conveyance study of the Kaskaskia River floodplain 
     from Vandalia, Illinois, to Carlyle Lake to determine the 
     impacts of existing and future waterfowl improvements on 
     flood stages, including detailed surveys and mapping 
     information to ensure proper hydraulic and hydrological 
     analysis;
       (E) the development and implementation of a computerized 
     inventory and analysis system for the Basin;
       (F) the development and implementation of a systemic plan 
     for the Basin to reduce flood impacts by means of ecosystem 
     restoration projects; and
       (G) the study and design of necessary measures to reduce 
     ongoing headcutting and restore the aquatic environment of 
     the Basin that has been degraded by the headcutting that has 
     occurred above the existing grade control structure.
       (4) Consultation.--The comprehensive plan shall be 
     developed by the Secretary in consultation with appropriate 
     Federal agencies, the State of Illinois, and the Kaskaskia 
     River Watershed Association.
       (5) Report to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
     date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
     the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works of the Senate a report containing the 
     comprehensive plan.
       (6) Additional studies and analyses.--After submission of a 
     report under paragraph (5), the Secretary shall conduct 
     studies and analyses of projects related to the comprehensive 
     plan that are appropriate and consistent with this 
     subsection.
       (c) General Provisions.--
       (1) Water quality.--In carrying out activities under this 
     section, the Secretary's recommendations shall be consistent 
     with applicable State water quality standards.
       (2) Public participation.--In developing the comprehensive 
     plan under subsection (b), the Secretary shall implement 
     procedures to facilitate public participation, including 
     providing advance notice of meetings, providing adequate 
     opportunity for public input and comment, maintaining 
     appropriate records, and making a record of the proceedings 
     of meetings available for public inspection.
       (d) Critical Projects and Initiatives.--If the Secretary, 
     in cooperation with appropriate Federal agencies and the 
     State of Illinois, determines that a project or initiative 
     for the Kaskaskia River Basin will produce independent, 
     immediate, and substantial benefits, the Secretary may 
     proceed with the implementation of the project.
       (e) Coordination.--The Secretary shall integrate activities 
     carried out under this section with ongoing Federal and State 
     programs, projects, and activities, including the following:
       (1) Farm programs of the Department of Agriculture.
       (2) Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (State of 
     Illinois) and Conservation 2000 Ecosystem Program of the 
     Illinois department of natural resources.
       (3) Conservation 2000 Conservation Practices Program and 
     the Livestock Management Facilities Act administered by the 
     Illinois department of agriculture.
       (4) National Buffer Initiative of the Natural Resources 
     Conservation Service.
       (5) Nonpoint source grant program administered by the 
     Illinois environmental protection agency.
       (6) Other programs that may be developed by the State of 
     Illinois or the Federal Government, or that are carried out 
     by nonprofit organizations, to carry out the objectives of 
     the Kaskaskia River Basin Comprehensive Plan.
       (f) In-Kind Services.--The Secretary may credit the cost of 
     in-kind services provided by the non-Federal interest for an 
     activity carried out under this section toward not more than 
     80 percent of the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     activity. In-kind services shall include all State funds 
     expended on programs that accomplish the goals of this 
     section, as determined by the Secretary. The programs may 
     include the Kaskaskia River Conservation Reserve Program, the 
     Illinois Conservation 2000 Program, the Open Lands Trust 
     Fund, and other appropriate programs carried out in the 
     Kaskaskia River Basin.
       (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $20,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5074. SOUTHWEST ILLINOIS.

       (a) Southwest Illinois Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``Southwest Illinois'' means the counties of Madison, St. 
     Clair, Monroe, Randolph, Perry, Franklin, Jackson, Union, 
     Alexander, Pulaski, and Williamson, Illinois.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in Southwest Illinois.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of design and construction 
     assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development projects in Southwest 
     Illinois, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
     related facilities, water supply and related facilities, and 
     surface water resource protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
     under this section--

[[Page 21805]]

       (i) shall be 75 percent; and
       (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
     reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share.
       (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project costs (including all reasonable 
     costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of the project on 
     publicly owned or controlled land), but the credit may not 
     exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of 
     the affected local government.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
     of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
     used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

     SEC. 5075. CALUMET REGION, INDIANA.

       Section 219(f)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (113 Stat. 335; 117 Stat. 1843) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(A) In general.--$100,000,000'';
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of planning and design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.''; and
       (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
     (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
     subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

     SEC. 5076. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for 
     a project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood 
     inundation areas in the State of Iowa, along the Missouri 
     River.
       (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall 
     include hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall 
     accurately portray the flood hazard areas in the floodplain. 
     The maps shall be produced in a high resolution format and 
     shall be made available to the State of Iowa in an electronic 
     format.
       (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-
     Federal interests for the project shall work with the 
     Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 
     ensure the validity of the maps developed under the project 
     for flood insurance purposes.
       (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
     Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements 
     with the non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of 
     project costs.
       (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
     project shall be 50 percent.
       (f) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this 
     section shall be construed to modify the prioritization of 
     map updates or the substantive requirements of the Federal 
     Emergency Management Agency flood map modernization program 
     authorized by section 1360 of the National Flood Insurance 
     Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101).
       (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

     SEC. 5077. PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.

       The Secretary shall complete a feasibility report for 
     rehabilitation of the project for flood damage reduction, 
     Paducah, Kentucky, authorized by section 4 of the Flood 
     Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), and, if the 
     Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the 
     Secretary may carry out the project at a total cost of 
     $3,000,000.

     SEC. 5078. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

       Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3773; 113 Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by 
     adding at the end the following:
       ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 
     percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section 
     may be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to 
     administer projects under this section at Federal expense.''.

     SEC. 5079. WINCHESTER, KENTUCKY.

       Section 219(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 114 Stat. 2763A-219) is amended by 
     adding at the end the following:
       ``(41) Winchester, kentucky.--Wastewater infrastructure, 
     Winchester, Kentucky.''.

     SEC. 5080. BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.

       Section 219(f)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by 
     striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$35,000,000''.

     SEC. 5081. CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL, LOUISIANA.

       The Secretary shall expedite completion of a dredged 
     material management plan for the Calcasieu Ship Channel, 
     Louisiana, and may take interim measures to increase the 
     capacity of existing disposal areas, or to construct new 
     confined or beneficial use disposal areas, for the channel.

     SEC. 5082. EAST ATCHAFALAYA BASIN AND AMITE RIVER BASIN 
                   REGION, LOUISIANA.

       (a) East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region 
     Defined.--In this section, the term ``East Atchafalaya Basin 
     and Amite River Basin Region'' means the following parishes 
     and municipalities in the State of Louisiana: Ascension, East 
     Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, Iberville, Livingston, Pointe 
     Coupee, St. Helena, West Baton Rouge, and West Feliciana.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in the East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin 
     Region.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of design and construction 
     assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development projects in the East 
     Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region, including 
     projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, 
     water supply and related facilities, environmental 
     restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
     development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement of a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
     under this section--
       (i) shall be 75 percent; and
       (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
     reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share.
       (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project costs (including all reasonable 
     costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of the project on 
     publicly owned or controlled land), but the credit may not 
     exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of 
     the affected local government.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
     of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
     used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

[[Page 21806]]



     SEC. 5083. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK PROJECT, 
                   LOUISIANA.

       Not later than July 1, 2008, the Secretary shall--
       (1) issue a final environmental impact statement relating 
     to the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project, Louisiana; 
     and
       (2) develop and maintain a transportation mitigation 
     program relating to that project in coordination with--
       (A) St. Bernard Parish;
       (B) Orleans Parish;
       (C) the Old Arabi Neighborhood Association; and
       (D) other interested parties.

     SEC. 5084. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.

       For purposes of carrying out section 121 of the Federal 
     Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273), the Lake 
     Pontchartrain, Louisiana, basin stakeholders conference 
     convened by the Environmental Protection Agency, National 
     Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and United States 
     Geological Survey on February 25, 2002, shall be treated as 
     being a management conference convened under section 320 of 
     such Act (33 U.S.C. 1330).

     SEC. 5085. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA REGION, LOUISIANA.

       (a) Definition of Southeast Louisiana Region.--In this 
     section, the term ``Southeast Louisiana Region'' means any of 
     the following parishes and municipalities in the State of 
     Louisiana:
       (1) Orleans.
       (2) Jefferson.
       (3) St. Tammany.
       (4) Tangipahoa.
       (5) St. Bernard.
       (6) St. Charles.
       (7) St. John.
       (8) Plaquemines.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in the Southeast Louisiana Region.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of design and construction 
     assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development projects in the Southeast 
     Louisiana Region, including projects for wastewater treatment 
     and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
     environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
     protection and development (including projects to improve 
     water quality in the Lake Pontchartrain basin).
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
     under this section--
       (i) shall be 75 percent; and
       (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
     reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is 
     the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest 
     incurred in providing the non-Federal share.
       (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project costs (including all reasonable 
     costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of the project on 
     publicly owned or controlled land), but the credit may not 
     exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of 
     the affected local government.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
     of amounts made available to carry out this section may be 
     used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $17,000,000.

     SEC. 5086. WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA.

       (a) Modification of Study.--The study for the project for 
     waterfront and riverine preservation, restoration, and 
     enhancement, Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge Parish, 
     Louisiana, being carried out under Committee Resolution 2570 
     of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives adopted July 23, 1998, is modified 
     to add West Feliciana Parish and East Baton Rouge Parish to 
     the geographic scope of the study.
       (b) Construction.--The Secretary may, upon completion of 
     the study, participate in the ecosystem restoration, 
     navigation, flood damage reduction, and recreation components 
     of the project.
       (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of design work carried out by the non-
     Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.
       (d) Expedited Consideration.--Section 517(5) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 345) is amended 
     to read as follows:
       ``(5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge, West Feliciana, 
     and East Baton Rouge Parishes, Louisiana, project for 
     waterfront and riverine preservation, restoration, and 
     enhancement modifications.''.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

     SEC. 5087. CHARLESTOWN, MARYLAND.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for 
     nonstructural flood damage reduction and ecosystem 
     restoration at Charlestown, Maryland.
       (b) Land Acquisition.--The flood damage reduction component 
     of the project may include the acquisition of private 
     property from willing sellers.
       (c) Justification.--Any nonstructural flood damage 
     reduction project to be carried out under this section that 
     will result in the conversion of property to use for 
     ecosystem restoration and wildlife habitat shall be justified 
     based on national ecosystem restoration benefits.
       (d) Use of Acquired Property.--Property acquired under this 
     section shall be maintained in public ownership for ecosystem 
     restoration and wildlife habitat.
       (e) Ability to Pay.--In determining the appropriate non-
     Federal cost share for the project, the Secretary shall 
     determine the ability of Cecil County, Maryland, to 
     participate as a cost-sharing non-Federal interest in 
     accordance with section 103(m) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $2,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5088. ST. MARY'S RIVER, MARYLAND.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out the project 
     for shoreline protection, St. Mary's River, Maryland, under 
     section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
     participation in the cost of protecting the shores of 
     publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
     U.S.C. 426g).
       (b) Use of Funds.--In carrying out the project under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary shall use funds made available 
     for such project under Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103).

     SEC. 5089. MASSACHUSETTS DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.

       The Secretary may cooperate with Massachusetts in the 
     management and long-term monitoring of aquatic dredged 
     material disposal sites within the State and is authorized to 
     accept funds from the State to carry out such activities.

     SEC. 5090. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the 
     vicinity of the project for navigation, Ontonagon Harbor, 
     Ontonagon County, Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the 
     Rivers and Harbors Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176) and 
     reauthorized by section 363 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3730), to determine if the 
     damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if 
     the Secretary determines that the damage is the result of a 
     Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a 
     project to mitigate the damage under section 111 of the River 
     and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i).

     SEC. 5091. CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for 
     emergency streambank protection along the Red Lake River in 
     Crookston, Minnesota, and, if the Secretary determines that 
     the project is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the 
     project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 
     U.S.C. 701r); except that the maximum amount of Federal funds 
     that may be expended for the project shall be $6,500,000.

     SEC. 5092. GARRISON AND KATHIO TOWNSHIP, MINNESOTA.

       (a) Project Description.--Section 219(f)(61) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is 
     amended--
       (1) in the paragraph heading by striking ``and kathio 
     township'' and inserting ``, crow wing county, mille lacs 
     county, mille lacs indian reservation, and kathio township'';

[[Page 21807]]

       (2) by striking ``$11,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$17,000,000'';
       (3) by inserting ``, Crow Wing County, Mille Lacs County, 
     Mille Lacs Indian Reservation established by the treaty of 
     February 22, 1855 (10 Stat. 1165),'' after ``Garrison''; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following: ``Such assistance 
     shall be provided directly to the Garrison-Kathio-West Mille 
     Lacs Lake Sanitary District, Minnesota, except for assistance 
     provided directly to the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe at the 
     discretion of the Secretary.''.
       (b) Procedures.--In carrying out the project authorized by 
     such section 219(f)(61), the Secretary may use the cost 
     sharing and contracting procedures available to the Secretary 
     under section 569 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 368).

     SEC. 5093. ITASCA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.

       The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage 
     reduction, Trout Lake and Canisteo Pit, Itasca County, 
     Minnesota, without regard to normal policy considerations.

     SEC. 5094. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.

       (a) Conveyance.--The Secretary shall convey to the city of 
     Minneapolis by quitclaim deed and without consideration all 
     right, title, and interest of the United States to the 
     property known as the War Department (Fort Snelling 
     Interceptor) Tunnel in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
       (b) Applicability of Property Screening Provisions.--
     Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
     to the conveyance under this section.

     SEC. 5095. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.

       (a) In General.--Section 569 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``Benton, Sherburne,'' 
     and inserting ``Beltrami, Hubbard, Wadena,'';
       (2) by striking the last sentence of subsection (e)(3)(B);
       (3) by striking subsection (g) and inserting the following:
       ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
     221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
     5b(b)), for any project carried out under this section, a 
     non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity with the 
     consent of the affected local government.'';
       (4) in subsection (h) by striking ``$40,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$54,000,000''; and
       (5) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 
     percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section 
     may be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to 
     administer projects under this section at Federal expense.''.
       (b) Biwabik, Minnesota.--The Secretary shall reimburse the 
     non-Federal interest for the project for environmental 
     infrastructure, Biwabik, Minnesota, carried out under section 
     569 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
     368), for planning, design, and construction costs that were 
     incurred by the non-Federal interest with respect to the 
     project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project and that were in excess of the non-Federal share of 
     the cost of the project if the Secretary determines that the 
     costs are appropriate.

     SEC. 5096. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

       The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the general 
     reevaluation report, authorized by section 438 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2640), for the 
     project for flood protection, Wild Rice River, Minnesota, 
     authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (84 Stat. 1825), to develop alternatives to the Twin Valley 
     Lake feature, and upon the completion of such report, shall 
     construct the project at a total cost of $20,000,000.

     SEC. 5097. MISSISSIPPI.

       Section 592(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 380; 117 Stat. 1837) is amended by striking 
     ``$100,000,000'' and inserting ``$110,000,000''.

     SEC. 5098. HARRISON, HANCOCK, AND JACKSON COUNTIES, 
                   MISSISSIPPI.

       In carrying out projects for the protection, restoration, 
     and creation of aquatic and ecologically related habitats 
     located in Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, 
     Mississippi, under section 204 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the Secretary shall 
     accept any portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     the projects in the form of in-kind services and materials.

     SEC. 5099. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS.

       As a part of the operation and maintenance of the project 
     for the Mississippi River (Regulating Works), between the 
     Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Missouri and Illinois, authorized 
     by the first section of an Act entitled ``Making 
     appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation 
     of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
     purposes'', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 630), the 
     Secretary may carry out activities necessary to restore and 
     protect fish and wildlife habitat in the middle Mississippi 
     River system. Such activities may include modification of 
     navigation training structures, modification and creation of 
     side channels, modification and creation of islands, and 
     studies and analysis necessary to apply adaptive management 
     principles in design of future work.

     SEC. 5100. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

       Section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (113 Stat. 337) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``a project'' and inserting ``projects'';
       (2) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$35,000,000''; and
       (3) by inserting ``and St. Louis County'' before ``, 
     Missouri''.

     SEC. 5101. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL GREENWAYS, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
     ecosystem restoration, recreation, and flood damage reduction 
     components of the St. Louis Regional Greenways Proposal of 
     the Metropolitan Park and Recreation District, St. Louis, 
     Missouri, dated March 31, 2004.
       (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the 
     Secretary shall coordinate with appropriate representatives 
     in the vicinity of St. Louis, Missouri, including the 
     Metropolitan Park and Recreation District, the city of St. 
     Louis, St. Louis County, and St. Charles County.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5102. MISSOULA, MONTANA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
     ecosystem restoration, flood damage reduction, and recreation 
     components of the Clark Fork River Revitalization Project, 
     Missoula, Montana.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5103. ST. MARY PROJECT, GLACIER COUNTY, MONTANA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     Bureau of Reclamation, shall conduct all necessary studies, 
     develop an emergency response plan, provide technical and 
     planning and design assistance, and rehabilitate and 
     construct the St. Mary Diversion and Conveyance Works project 
     located within the exterior boundaries of the Blackfeet 
     Reservation in the State of Montana, at a total cost of 
     $153,000,000.
       (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the total cost of 
     the project under this section shall be 75 percent.
       (c) Participation by Blackfeet Tribe and Fort Belknap 
     Indian Community.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), no 
     construction shall be carried out under this section until 
     the earlier of--
       (A) the date on which Congress approves the reserved water 
     rights settlements of the Blackfeet Tribe and the Fort 
     Belknap Indian Community; and
       (B) January 1, 2011.
       (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect 
     to construction relating to--
       (A) standard operation and maintenance; or
       (B) emergency repairs to ensure water transportation or the 
     protection of life and property.
       (3) Requirement.--The Blackfeet Tribe shall be a 
     participant in all phases of the project authorized by this 
     section.

     SEC. 5104. LOWER PLATTE RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, 
                   NEBRASKA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with and 
     provide assistance to the Lower Platte River natural 
     resources districts in the State of Nebraska to serve as non-
     Federal interests with respect to--
       (1) conducting comprehensive watershed planning in the 
     natural resource districts;
       (2) assessing water resources in the natural resource 
     districts; and
       (3) providing project feasibility planning, design, and 
     construction assistance for water resource and watershed 
     management in the natural resource districts, including 
     projects for environmental restoration and flood damage 
     reduction.
       (b) Funding.--
       (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     carrying out an activity described in subsection (a)(1) shall 
     be 75 percent.
       (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of carrying out an activity described in subsection (a) may 
     be provided in cash or in kind.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section 
     $12,000,000.

     SEC. 5105. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY.

       Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (106 Stat. 4849; 110 Stat. 3779) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) by striking ``design'' and inserting ``planning, 
     design,''; and
       (B) by striking ``Hackensack Meadowlands Development'' and 
     all that follows through ``Plan for'' and inserting ``New 
     Jersey Meadowlands Commission for the development of an 
     environmental improvement program for'';
       (2) in subsection (b)--
       (A) in the subsection heading by striking ``Required'';
       (B) by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may'';
       (C) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
       ``(1) Restoration and acquisitions of significant wetlands 
     and aquatic habitat that contribute to the Meadowlands 
     ecosystem.'';
       (D) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and aquatic habitat'' 
     before the period at the end; and
       (E) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the following:
       ``(7) Research, development, and implementation for a water 
     quality improvement program, including restoration of 
     hydrology and tidal flows and remediation of hot spots and 
     other sources of contaminants that degrade existing or 
     planned sites.'';
       (3) in subsection (c)--

[[Page 21808]]

       (A) by striking ``non-Federal sponsor'' and inserting 
     ``non-Federal interest''; and
       (B) by inserting before the last sentence the following: 
     ``The non-Federal interest may also provide in-kind services 
     not to exceed the non-Federal share of the total project 
     cost.'';
       (4) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e);
       (5) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
       ``(d) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a 
     project to be carried out under the program developed under 
     subsection (a) the cost of design work carried out by the 
     non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.''; and
       (6) in subsection (e) (as redesignated by paragraph (4) of 
     this subsection) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$20,000,000''.

     SEC. 5106. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

       (a) Development of Program.--Section 404(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``processes'' and inserting ``and related 
     environmental processes'';
       (2) by inserting after ``Atlantic Coast'' the following: 
     ``(and associated back bays)'';
       (3) by inserting after ``actions'' the following: ``, 
     environmental restoration or conservation measures for 
     coastal and back bays,''; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following: ``The plan for 
     collecting data and monitoring information included in such 
     annual report shall be coordinated with and agreed to by 
     appropriate agencies of the State of New York.''.
       (b) Annual Reports.--Section 404(b) of such Act is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``Initial Plan.--Not later than 12 months 
     after the date of the enactment of this Act, the'' and 
     inserting ``Annual Reports.--The'';
       (2) by striking ``initial plan for data collection and 
     monitoring'' and inserting ``annual report of data collection 
     and monitoring activities''; and
       (3) by striking the last sentence.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 404(c) of 
     such Act (113 Stat. 341) is amended by striking ``and an 
     additional total of $2,500,000 for fiscal years thereafter'' 
     and inserting ``$2,500,000 for fiscal years 2000 through 
     2004, and $7,500,000 for fiscal years beginning after 
     September 30, 2004,''.
       (d) Tsunami Warning System.--Section 404 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended 
     by adding at the end the following:
       ``(d) Tsunami Warning System.--There is authorized to be 
     appropriated $800,000 for the Secretary to carry out a 
     project for a tsunami warning system, Atlantic Coast of New 
     York.''.

     SEC. 5107. COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

       In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639), the Secretary shall 
     give priority to work in College Point, New York City, New 
     York.

     SEC. 5108. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 221 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward 
     the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
     ecosystem restoration, Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, 
     New York, the cost of design and construction work carried 
     out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 5109. HUDSON RIVER, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary may participate with the State of New York, 
     New York City, and the Hudson River Park Trust in carrying 
     out activities to restore critical marine habitat, improve 
     safety, and protect and rehabilitate critical infrastructure 
     with respect to the Hudson River. There is authorized to be 
     appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5110. MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NEW YORK.

       As part of the operation and maintenance of the Mount 
     Morris Dam, New York, the Secretary may make improvements to 
     the access road for the dam to provide safe access to a 
     Federal visitor's center.

     SEC. 5111. NORTH HEMPSTEAD AND GLEN COVE NORTH SHORE 
                   WATERSHED RESTORATION, NEW YORK.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
     ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, 
     and recreation components of the North Hempstead and Glen 
     Cove North Shore watershed restoration, New York.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5112. ROCHESTER, NEW YORK.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
     ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, 
     and recreation components of the Port of Rochester waterfront 
     revitalization project, Rochester, New York.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5113. NORTH CAROLINA.

       (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall 
     establish a program to provide environmental assistance to 
     non-Federal interests in the State of North Carolina.
       (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of design and construction 
     assistance for environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in North Carolina, 
     including projects for--
       (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
       (2) combined sewer overflow, water supply, storage, 
     treatment, and related facilities;
       (3) drinking water infrastructure including treatment and 
     related facilities;
       (4) environmental restoration;
       (5) stormwater infrastructure; and
       (6) surface water resource protection and development.
       (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (d) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     development plan or resource protection plan, including 
     appropriate plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
     under this section--
       (i) shall be 75 percent; and
       (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
     reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project, in an amount not to exceed 6 percent of 
     the total construction costs of the project, the cost of 
     design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
     project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is 
     the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest 
     incurred in providing the non-Federal share.
       (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project costs (including all reasonable 
     costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of the project on 
     publicly owned or controlled land).
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $13,000,000.

     SEC. 5114. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

       Section 219(f)(64) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended by inserting ``water 
     and'' before ``wastewater''.

     SEC. 5115. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, NORTH CAROLINA.

       The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the 
     calculations necessary to negotiate and execute a revised, 
     permanent contract for water supply storage at John H. Kerr 
     Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina, among the Secretary and 
     the Kerr Lake Regional Water System and the city of 
     Henderson, North Carolina.

     SEC. 5116. CINCINNATI, OHIO.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may undertake the ecosystem 
     restoration and recreation components of the Central 
     Riverfront Park Master Plan, dated December 1999, at a total 
     cost of $30,000,000.
       (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of planning, design, and construction work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 5117. OHIO RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.

       (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       (1) Ohio river basin.--The term ``Ohio River Basin'' means 
     the Ohio River, its backwaters, its side channels, and all 
     tributaries (including their watersheds) that drain into the 
     Ohio River and encompassing areas of any of the States of 
     Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, 
     Illinois, New York, and Virginia.
       (2) Compact.--The term ``Compact'' means the Ohio River 
     Watershed Sanitation Commission flood and pollution control 
     compact between the States of Indiana, West Virginia, Ohio, 
     Kentucky, Pennsylvania, New York, Illinois, and Virginia, to 
     which consent was given by Congress pursuant to the Act of 
     July 11, 1940 (54 Stat. 752) and that was chartered in 1948.
       (b) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide planning, 
     design, and construction assistance to

[[Page 21809]]

     the Compact for the improvement of the quality of the 
     environment in and along the Ohio River Basin.
       (c) Priorities.--In providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall give priority to reducing or 
     eliminating the presence of organic pollutants in the Ohio 
     River Basin through the renovation and technological 
     improvement of the organic detection system monitoring 
     stations along the Ohio River in the States of Indiana, Ohio, 
     West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.

     SEC. 5118. TOUSSAINT RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, CARROLL 
                   TOWNSHIP, OHIO.

       (a) In General.--The costs of operation and maintenance 
     activities for the Toussaint River Federal navigation 
     project, Carroll Township, Ohio, that are carried out in 
     accordance with section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and relate directly to the presence of 
     unexploded ordnance, shall be carried out at Federal expense.
       (b) Calculation of Total Costs.--The Secretary shall not 
     consider the additional costs of dredging due to the presence 
     of unexploded ordnance when calculating the costs of the 
     project referred to in subsection (a) for the purposes of 
     section 107(b) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 577(b)).

     SEC. 5119. STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLANNING, OKLAHOMA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide technical 
     assistance for the development of updates of the Oklahoma 
     comprehensive water plan.
       (b) Technical Assistance.--Technical assistance provided 
     under subsection (a) may include--
       (1) acquisition of hydrologic data, groundwater 
     characterization, database development, and data 
     distribution;
       (2) expansion of surface water and groundwater monitoring 
     networks;
       (3) assessment of existing water resources, surface water 
     storage, and groundwater storage potential;
       (4) numerical analysis and modeling necessary to provide an 
     integrated understanding of water resources and water 
     management options;
       (5) participation in State planning forums and planning 
     groups;
       (6) coordination of Federal water management planning 
     efforts; and
       (7) technical review of data, models, planning scenarios, 
     and water plans developed by the State.
       (c) Allocation.--The Secretary shall allocate, subject to 
     the availability of appropriations, $6,500,000 to provide 
     technical assistance and for the development of updates of 
     the Oklahoma comprehensive water plan.
       (d) Cost Sharing Requirement.--The non-Federal share of the 
     total cost of any activity carried out under this section--
       (1) shall be 25 percent; and
       (2) may be in the form of cash or any in-kind services that 
     the Secretary determines would contribute substantially 
     toward the conduct and completion of the activity assisted.

     SEC. 5120. FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON.

       The Secretary may treat all work carried out for emergency 
     corrective actions to repair the embankment dam at the Fern 
     Ridge Lake project, Oregon, as a dam safety project. The cost 
     of work carried out may be recovered in accordance with 
     section 1203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 467n; 100 Stat. 4263).

     SEC. 5121. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 219(f)(66) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000'';
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
     agreement for the project.''; and
       (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
     (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
     subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

     SEC. 5122. CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 219(f)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' 
     and inserting ``$2,000,000''.

     SEC. 5123. KEHLY RUN DAMS, PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 504(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 338; 117 Stat. 1842) is amended by striking 
     ``Dams'' and inserting ``Dams No. 1-5''.

     SEC. 5124. LEHIGH RIVER, LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Secretary shall use existing water quality data to 
     model the effects of the Francis E. Walter Dam, at different 
     water levels, to determine its impact on water and related 
     resources in and along the Lehigh River in Lehigh County, 
     Pennsylvania. There is authorized to be appropriated $500,000 
     to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5125. NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 219(f)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``and Monroe'' 
     and inserting ``Northumberland, Union, Snyder, Luzerne, and 
     Monroe''.

     SEC. 5126. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND 
                   NEW YORK.

       (a) Study and Strategy Development.--Section 567(a) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3787; 114 
     Stat. 2662) is amended--
       (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting 
     ``and carry out'' after ``develop''; and
       (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``$10,000,000.'' and 
     inserting ``$20,000,000, of which the Secretary may utilize 
     not more than $5,000,000 to design and construct feasible 
     pilot projects during the development of the strategy to 
     demonstrate alternative approaches for the strategy. The 
     total cost for any single pilot project may not exceed 
     $500,000. The Secretary shall evaluate the results of the 
     pilot projects and consider the results in the development of 
     the strategy.''.
       (b) Partnership Agreements.--Section 567(c) of such Act 
     (114 Stat. 2662) is amended--
       (1) in the subsection heading by striking ``Cooperation'' 
     and inserting ``Partnership''; and
       (2) in the first sentence--
       (A) by inserting ``and carrying out'' after ``developing''; 
     and
       (B) by striking ``cooperation'' and inserting ``cost-
     sharing and partnership''.
       (c) Implementation of Strategy.--Section 567(d) of such Act 
     (114 Stat. 2663) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary'';
       (2) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) (as so 
     designated)--
       (A) by striking ``implement'' and inserting ``carry out''; 
     and
       (B) by striking ``implementing'' and inserting ``carrying 
     out'';
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Priority project.--In carrying out projects to 
     implement the strategy, the Secretary shall give priority to 
     the project for ecosystem restoration, Cooperstown, New York, 
     described in the Upper Susquehanna River Basin--Cooperstown 
     Area Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study, dated December 
     2004, prepared by the Corps of Engineers and the New York 
     State department of environmental conservation.''; and
       (4) by aligning the remainder of the text of paragraph (1) 
     (as designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection) with 
     paragraph (2) (as added by paragraph (3) of this subsection).
       (d) Credit.--Section 567 of such Act (110 Stat. 3787; 114 
     Stat. 2662) is amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(e) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of a project under this section--
       ``(1) in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
     Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the cost of design and 
     construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
     the project before the date of the partnership agreement for 
     the project; and
       ``(2) the cost of in-kind services and materials provided 
     for the project by the non-Federal interest.''.

     SEC. 5127. CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO.

       The Secretary shall review a report prepared by the non-
     Federal interest concerning flood protection and 
     environmental restoration for Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, 
     Puerto Rico, and, if the Secretary determines that the report 
     meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps of 
     Engineers and that the project is feasible, the Secretary may 
     carry out the project at a total cost of $150,000,000.

     SEC. 5128. LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

       Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838) 
     is amended by striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$60,000,000''.

     SEC. 5129. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX 
                   TRIBE, AND TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT 
                   RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.

       (a) Disbursement Provisions of State of South Dakota and 
     Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
     Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.--
     Section 602(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 386) is amended--
       (1) in subparagraph (A)--
       (A) in clause (i) by inserting ``and the Secretary of the 
     Treasury'' after ``Secretary''; and
       (B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
       ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On notification in 
     accordance with clause (i), the Secretary of the Treasury 
     shall make available to the State of South Dakota funds from 
     the State of South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
     Restoration Trust Fund established under section 603 to be 
     used to carry out the plan for terrestrial wildlife habitat 
     restoration submitted by the State of South Dakota after the 
     State certifies to the Secretary of the Treasury that the 
     funds to be disbursed will be used in accordance with section 
     603(d)(3) and only after the Trust Fund is fully 
     capitalized.''; and
       (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking clause (ii) and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On notification in 
     accordance with clause (i), the Secretary of the Treasury 
     shall make available to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
     the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe funds from the Cheyenne River 
     Sioux Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund and 
     the Lower Brule Sioux Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
     Restoration Trust Fund, respectively, established under 
     section 604, to be used to carry out the plans for 
     terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the 
     Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower

[[Page 21810]]

     Brule Sioux Tribe, respectively, to after the respective 
     tribe certifies to the Secretary of the Treasury that the 
     funds to be disbursed will be used in accordance with section 
     604(d)(3) and only after the Trust Fund is fully 
     capitalized.''.
       (b) Investment Provisions of the State of South Dakota 
     Terrestrial Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund.--Section 603 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 388; 
     114 Stat. 2664) is amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
       ``(c) Investments.--
       ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
     the amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest 
     earned on those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations 
     of the United States issued directly to the Fund.
       ``(2) Investment requirements.--
       ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
     invest the amounts in the Fund in accordance with the 
     requirements of this paragraph.
       ``(B) Separate investments of principal and interest.--
       ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts deposited in the Fund 
     under subsection (b) shall be credited to an account within 
     the Fund (referred to in this paragraph as the `principal 
     account') and invested as provided in subparagraph (C).
       ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest earned from 
     investing amounts in the principal account of the Fund shall 
     be transferred to a separate account within the Fund 
     (referred to in this paragraph as the `interest account') and 
     invested as provided in subparagraph (D).
       ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned from investing 
     amounts in the interest account of the Fund shall be credited 
     to the interest account.
       ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
       ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount deposited in the 
     principal account of the Fund shall be invested initially in 
     eligible obligations having the shortest maturity then 
     available until the date on which the amount is divided into 
     3 substantially equal portions and those portions are 
     invested in eligible obligations that are identical (except 
     for transferability) to the next-issued publicly issued 
     Treasury obligations having a 2-year maturity, a 5-year 
     maturity, and a 10-year maturity, respectively.
       ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-year, 5-year, and 
     10-year eligible obligation matures, the principal of the 
     maturing eligible obligation shall also be invested initially 
     in the shortest-maturity eligible obligation then available 
     until the principal is reinvested substantially equally in 
     the eligible obligations that are identical (except for 
     transferability) to the next-issued publicly issued Treasury 
     obligations having 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year maturities.
       ``(iii) Discontinuance of issuance of obligations.--If the 
     Department of the Treasury discontinues issuing to the public 
     obligations having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year maturities, the 
     principal of any maturing eligible obligation shall be 
     reinvested substantially equally in eligible obligations that 
     are identical (except for transferability) to the next-issued 
     publicly issued Treasury obligations of the maturities longer 
     than 1 year then available.
       ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
       ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until the date on which 
     the Fund is fully capitalized, amounts in the interest 
     account of the Fund shall be invested in eligible obligations 
     that are identical (except for transferability) to publicly 
     issued Treasury obligations that have maturities that 
     coincide, to the maximum extent practicable, with the date on 
     which the Fund is expected to be fully capitalized.
       ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and after the date on 
     which the Fund is fully capitalized, amounts in the interest 
     account of the Fund shall be invested and reinvested in 
     eligible obligations having the shortest maturity then 
     available until the amounts are withdrawn and transferred to 
     fund the activities authorized under subsection (d)(3).
       ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
     eligible obligations purchased as investments of the 
     principal account shall not exceed the par value of the 
     obligations so that the amount of the principal account shall 
     be preserved in perpetuity.
       ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations having the 
     same maturity and purchase price, the obligation to be 
     purchased shall be the obligation having the highest yield.
       ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations purchased 
     shall generally be held to their maturities.
       ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
     frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
     Treasury shall review with the State of South Dakota the 
     results of the investment activities and financial status of 
     the Fund during the preceding 12-month period.
       ``(4) Audits.--
       ``(A) In general.--The activities of the State of South 
     Dakota (referred to in this subsection as the `State') in 
     carrying out the plan of the State for terrestrial wildlife 
     habitat restoration under section 602(a) shall be audited as 
     part of the annual audit that the State is required to 
     prepare under the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-
     133 (or a successor circulation).
       ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that conducts 
     an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
       ``(i) determine whether funds received by the State under 
     this section during the period covered by the audit were used 
     to carry out the plan of the State in accordance with this 
     section; and
       ``(ii) include the determination under clause (i) in the 
     written findings of the audit.
       ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
       ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
     determines that meeting the requirements under paragraph (2) 
     with respect to the investment of a Fund is not practicable, 
     or would result in adverse consequences for the Fund, the 
     Secretary shall modify the requirements, as the Secretary 
     determines to be necessary.
       ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement under 
     subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury shall consult 
     with the State regarding the proposed modification.'';
       (2) in subsection (d)(2) by inserting ``of the Treasury'' 
     after ``Secretary''; and
       (3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
       ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
     appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses 
     associated with investing the Fund and auditing the uses of 
     amounts withdrawn from the Fund--
       ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007; and
       ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
     year.''.
       (c) Investment Provisions for Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 
     and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Trust Funds.--Section 604 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 389; 114 
     Stat. 2665) is amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
       ``(c) Investments.--
       ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
     the amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest 
     earned on those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations 
     of the United States issued directly to the Funds.
       ``(2) Investment requirements.--
       ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
     invest the amounts in each of the Funds in accordance with 
     the requirements of this paragraph.
       ``(B) Separate investments of principal and interest.--
       ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts deposited in each 
     Fund under subsection (b) shall be credited to an account 
     within the Fund (referred to in this paragraph as the 
     `principal account') and invested as provided in subparagraph 
     (C).
       ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest earned from 
     investing amounts in the principal account of each Fund shall 
     be transferred to a separate account within the Fund 
     (referred to in this paragraph as the `interest account') and 
     invested as provided in subparagraph (D).
       ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned from investing 
     amounts in the interest account of each Fund shall be 
     credited to the interest account.
       ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
       ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount deposited in the 
     principal account of each Fund shall be invested initially in 
     eligible obligations having the shortest maturity then 
     available until the date on which the amount is divided into 
     3 substantially equal portions and those portions are 
     invested in eligible obligations that are identical (except 
     for transferability) to the next-issued publicly issued 
     Treasury obligations having a 2-year maturity, a 5-year 
     maturity, and a 10-year maturity, respectively.
       ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-year, 5-year, and 
     10-year eligible obligation matures, the principal of the 
     maturing eligible obligation shall also be invested initially 
     in the shortest-maturity eligible obligation then available 
     until the principal is reinvested substantially equally in 
     the eligible obligations that are identical (except for 
     transferability) to the next-issued publicly issued Treasury 
     obligations having 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year maturities.
       ``(iii) Discontinuation of issuance of obligations.--If the 
     Department of the Treasury discontinues issuing to the public 
     obligations having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year maturities, the 
     principal of any maturing eligible obligation shall be 
     reinvested substantially equally in eligible obligations that 
     are identical (except for transferability) to the next-issued 
     publicly issued Treasury obligations of the maturities longer 
     than 1 year then available.
       ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
       ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until the date on which 
     each Fund is fully capitalized, amounts in the interest 
     account of the Fund shall be invested in eligible obligations 
     that are identical (except for transferability) to publicly 
     issued Treasury obligations that have maturities that 
     coincide, to the maximum extent practicable, with the date on 
     which the Fund is expected to be fully capitalized.
       ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and after the date on 
     which each Fund is fully capitalized, amounts in the interest 
     account of the Fund shall be invested and reinvested in 
     eligible obligations having the shortest maturity then 
     available until the amounts are withdrawn and transferred to 
     fund the activities authorized under subsection (d)(3).
       ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
     eligible obligations purchased as investments of the 
     principal account shall not exceed the par value of the 
     obligations so that the amount of the principal account shall 
     be preserved in perpetuity.

[[Page 21811]]

       ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations having the 
     same maturity and purchase price, the obligation to be 
     purchased shall be the obligation having the highest yield.
       ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations purchased 
     shall generally be held to their maturities.
       ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
     frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
     Treasury shall review with the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
     the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe (referred to in this subsection 
     as the `Tribes') the results of the investment activities and 
     financial status of the Funds during the preceding 12-month 
     period.
       ``(4) Audits.--
       ``(A) In general.--The activities of the Tribes in carrying 
     out the plans of the Tribes for terrestrial wildlife habitat 
     restoration under section 602(a) shall be audited as part of 
     the annual audit that the Tribes are required to prepare 
     under the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133 (or 
     a successor circulation).
       ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that conducts 
     an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
       ``(i) determine whether funds received by the Tribes under 
     this section during the period covered by the audit were used 
     to carry out the plan of the appropriate Tribe in accordance 
     with this section; and
       ``(ii) include the determination under clause (i) in the 
     written findings of the audit.
       ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
       ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
     determines that meeting the requirements under paragraph (2) 
     with respect to the investment of a Fund is not practicable, 
     or would result in adverse consequences for the Fund, the 
     Secretary shall modify the requirements, as the Secretary 
     determines to be necessary.
       ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement under 
     subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury shall consult 
     with the Tribes regarding the proposed modification.''; and
       (2) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
       ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
     appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses 
     associated with investing the Funds and auditing the uses of 
     amounts withdrawn from the Funds--
       ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007; and
       ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
     year.''.

     SEC. 5130. EAST TENNESSEE.

       (a) East Tennessee Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``East Tennessee'' means the counties of Blount, Knox, 
     Loudon, McMinn, Monroe, and Sevier, Tennessee.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in East Tennessee.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of design and construction 
     assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development projects in East 
     Tennessee, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
     related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
     environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
     protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
     under this section--
       (i) shall be 75 percent; and
       (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
     reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share of the project cost.
       (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project cost (including all reasonable costs 
     associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of the project on 
     publicly owned or controlled land), but the credit may not 
     exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of 
     the affected local government.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
     of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
     used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

     SEC. 5131. FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE.

       The Secretary shall--
       (1) conduct a study of the Fritz Landing Agricultural Spur 
     Levee, Tennessee, to determine the extent of levee 
     modifications that would be required to make the levee and 
     associated drainage structures consistent with Federal 
     standards;
       (2) design and construct such modifications; and
       (3) after completion of such modifications, incorporate the 
     levee into the project for flood control, Mississippi River 
     and Tributaries, authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act for 
     the control of floods on the Mississippi River and its 
     tributaries, and for other purposes'', approved May 15, 1928 
     (45 Stat. 534-539).

     SEC. 5132. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE.

       The Secretary shall plan, design, and construct a trail 
     system at the J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee, 
     authorized by section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
     authorizing the construction of certain public works on 
     rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
     purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), and 
     adjacent public property, including design and construction 
     of support facilities. In carrying out such improvements, the 
     Secretary is authorized to use funds made available by the 
     State of Tennessee from any Federal or State source, or both.

     SEC. 5133. NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
     ecosystem restoration, recreation, navigation, and flood 
     damage reduction components of the Nashville Riverfront 
     Concept Plan, dated February 2007.
       (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the 
     Secretary shall coordinate with appropriate representatives 
     in the vicinity of Nashville, Tennessee, including the 
     Nashville Parks and Recreation Department, the city of 
     Nashville, and Davidson County.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 5134. NONCONNAH WEIR, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.

       The project for flood control, Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee 
     and Mississippi, authorized by section 401 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124) and 
     modified by the section 334 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2611), is modified to 
     authorize the Secretary--
       (1) to reconstruct, at Federal expense, the weir originally 
     constructed in the vicinity of the mouth of Nonconnah Creek; 
     and
       (2) to make repairs and maintain the weir in the future so 
     that the weir functions properly.

     SEC. 5135. TENNESSEE RIVER PARTNERSHIP.

       (a) In General.--As part of the operation and maintenance 
     of the project for navigation, Tennessee River, Tennessee, 
     Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky, authorized by the first 
     section of the River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 
     927), the Secretary may enter into a partnership with a 
     nonprofit entity to remove debris from the Tennessee River in 
     the vicinity of Knoxville, Tennessee, by providing a vessel 
     to such entity, at Federal expense, for such debris removal 
     purposes.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $500,000.

     SEC. 5136. TOWN CREEK, LENOIR CITY, TENNESSEE.

       The Secretary shall design and construct the project for 
     flood damage reduction designated as Alternative 4 in the 
     Town Creek, Lenoir City, Loudon County, Tennessee, 
     feasibility report of the Nashville district engineer, dated 
     November 2000, under the authority of section 205 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), notwithstanding 
     section 1 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 
     U.S.C. 701a; 49 Stat. 1570). The non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project shall be subject to section 103(m) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).

     SEC. 5137. UPPER MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT, TENNESSEE, ARKANSAS, 
                   AND MISSISSIPPI.

       The Secretary may participate with non-Federal and 
     nonprofit entities to address issues concerning managing 
     groundwater as a sustainable

[[Page 21812]]

     resource through the Upper Mississippi Embayment, Tennessee, 
     Arkansas, and Mississippi, and to coordinate the protection 
     of groundwater supply and groundwater quality of the 
     Embayment with local surface water protection programs. There 
     is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this 
     section.

     SEC. 5138. TEXAS.

       (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall 
     establish a program to provide environmental assistance to 
     non-Federal interests in the State of Texas.
       (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of planning, design, and 
     construction assistance for water-related environmental 
     infrastructure and resource protection and development 
     projects in Texas, including projects for water supply, 
     storage, treatment, and related facilities, water quality 
     protection, wastewater treatment, and related facilities, 
     environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
     protection, and development, as identified by the Texas Water 
     Development Board.
       (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (d) Partnership Agreements.--Before providing assistance 
     under this section, the Secretary shall enter into a 
     partnership agreement with a non-Federal interest.
       (e) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
     project under this section--
       (A) shall be 75 percent; and
       (B) may be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements 
     of project costs.
       (2) In-kind services.--The non-Federal share may be 
     provided in the form of materials and in-kind services, 
     including planning, design, construction, and management 
     services, as the Secretary determines to be compatible with, 
     and necessary for, the project.
       (3) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of design work carried out by 
     the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
     the partnership agreement for the project.
       (4) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project costs.
       (5) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

     SEC. 5139. BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED, TEXAS.

       (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal, State, and local entities, shall 
     develop, as expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive 
     plan for development of new technologies and innovative 
     approaches for restoring, preserving, and protecting the 
     Bosque River watershed within Bosque, Hamilton, McLennan, and 
     Erath Counties, Texas. The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     Secretary of Agriculture, may carry out activities identified 
     in the comprehensive plan to demonstrate practicable 
     alternatives for stabilization and enhancement of land and 
     water resources in the basin.
       (b) Services of Nonprofit Institutions and Other 
     Entities.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary may 
     utilize, through contracts or other means, the services of 
     nonprofit institutions and such other entities as the 
     Secretary considers appropriate.
       (c) Non-Federal Share.--
       (1) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of planning, design, and construction work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
       (2) Development of comprehensive plan.--The non-Federal 
     share of the cost of development of the plan under subsection 
     (a) shall be 25 percent.
       (3) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     the cost of operation and maintenance for measures 
     constructed with assistance provided under this section shall 
     be 100 percent.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

     SEC. 5140. DALLAS COUNTY REGION, TEXAS.

       (a) Dallas County Region Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``Dallas County region'' means the city of Dallas, and 
     the municipalities of DeSoto, Duncanville, Lancaster, Wilmer, 
     Hutchins, Balch Springs, Cedar Hill, Glenn Heights, and 
     Ferris, Texas.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in the Dallas County region.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this 
     section may be in the form of design and construction 
     assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development projects in the Dallas 
     County region, including projects for wastewater treatment 
     and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
     environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
     protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
     under this section--
       (i) shall be 75 percent; and
       (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
     reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost design work carried out by the 
     non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
     partnership agreement for the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share.
       (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-
     Federal share of project costs (including all reasonable 
     costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
     construction, operation, and maintenance of the project on 
     publicly owned or controlled land), but the credit may not 
     exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section shall be construed to waive, limit, or 
     otherwise affect the applicability of any provision of 
     Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
     to be carried out with assistance provided under this 
     section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of 
     the affected local government.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent 
     of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
     used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

     SEC. 5141. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Trinity 
     River and tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 2 of the 
     Act entitled, ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, 
     and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
     harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (59 
     Stat. 18), is modified to--
       (1) direct the Secretary to review the Balanced Vision Plan 
     for the Trinity River Corridor, Dallas, Texas, dated December 
     2003 and amended in March 2004, prepared by the non-Federal 
     interest for the project;
       (2) direct the Secretary to review the Interior Levee 
     Drainage Study Phase-I report, Dallas, Texas, dated September 
     2006, prepared by the non-Federal interest; and
       (3) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     technically sound and environmentally acceptable, authorize 
     the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
     $459,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $298,000,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $161,000,000.
       (b) Credit.--
       (1) In-kind contributions.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
     accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of the project the cost of planning, design, and 
     construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
     the project before the date of the partnership agreement for 
     the project.
       (2) Cash contributions.--The Secretary shall accept funds 
     provided by the non-Federal interest for use in carrying out 
     planning, engineering, and design for the project. The 
     Federal share of such planning, engineering, and design 
     carried out with non-Federal contributions shall be credited 
     against the non-Federal share of the cost of the project.

     SEC. 5142. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

       Section 575(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3789; 113 Stat. 311) is amended--

[[Page 21813]]

       (1) in paragraph (3) by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (2) in paragraph (4) by striking the period at the end and 
     inserting ``; and''; and
       (3) by adding the following:
       ``(5) the project for flood control, Upper White Oak Bayou, 
     Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4125).''.

     SEC. 5143. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
     environmental restoration, and recreation, Johnson Creek, 
     Arlington, Texas, authorized by section 101(b)(14) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat 280), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
     substantially in accordance with the report entitled 
     ``Johnson Creek: A Vision of Conservation'', dated March 30, 
     2006, at a total cost of $80,000,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $52,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $28,000,000, if the Secretary determines that the project 
     is feasible.
       (b) Non-Federal Share.--
       (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project may be provided in cash or in the form of in-kind 
     services or materials.
       (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of planning, design, and construction work 
     carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
     before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
       (c) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the 
     project, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest 
     to participate in the financing of the project in accordance 
     with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (100 Stat. 4184).
       (d) Conforming Amendment.--Section 134 of the Energy and 
     Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2263) 
     is repealed.

     SEC. 5144. ONION CREEK, TEXAS.

       (a) Inclusion of Costs and Benefits of Relocation of Flood-
     Prone Residences.--In carrying out the study for the project 
     for flood damage reduction, recreation, and ecosystem 
     restoration, Onion Creek, Texas, the Secretary shall include 
     the costs and benefits associated with the relocation of 
     flood-prone residences in the study area for the project in 
     the period beginning 2 years before the date of initiation of 
     the study and ending on the date of execution of the 
     partnership agreement for construction of the project to the 
     extent the Secretary determines such relocations are 
     compatible with the project.
       (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project referred to in subsection (a) the cost of relocation 
     of those flood-prone residences described in subsection (a) 
     that are incurred by the non-Federal interest before the date 
     of the partnership agreement for the project.

     SEC. 5145. CONNECTICUT RIVER DAMS, VERMONT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate, design, and 
     carry out structural modifications at Federal cost to the 
     Union Village Dam (Ompompanoosuc River), North Hartland Dam 
     (Ottauquechee River), North Springfield Dam (Black River), 
     Ball Mountain Dam (West River), and Townshend Dam (West 
     River), Vermont, to regulate flow and temperature to mitigate 
     downstream impacts on aquatic habitat and fisheries.
       (b) Inclusion.--During the evaluation and design portion of 
     the modifications authorized by this section, the Secretary 
     shall ensure that a sustainable flow analysis is conducted 
     for each dam.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.

     SEC. 5146. LAKE CHAMPLAIN CANAL, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.

       (a) Dispersal Barrier Project.--The Secretary shall 
     determine, at Federal expense, the feasibility of a dispersal 
     barrier project at the Lake Champlain Canal, Vermont and New 
     York, to prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species.
       (b) Construction, Maintenance, and Operation.--If the 
     Secretary determines that the project described in subsection 
     (a) is feasible, the Secretary shall construct, maintain, and 
     operate a dispersal barrier at the Lake Champlain Canal at 
     Federal expense.

     SEC. 5147. DYKE MARSH, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA.

       The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park 
     Service to restore Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.

     SEC. 5148. EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 219(f)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``$20,000,000 for water supply and 
     wastewater infrastructure'' and inserting the following:
       ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000 for water supply, wastewater 
     infrastructure, and environmental restoration'';
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
     with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
     agreement for the project.''; and
       (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
     (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
     subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

     SEC. 5149. JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA.

       The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park 
     Service to provide technical and project management 
     assistance for the James River, Virginia, with a particular 
     emphasis on locations along the shoreline adversely impacted 
     by Hurricane Isabel.

     SEC. 5150. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASHINGTON.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation 
     in Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, to determine if 
     the siltation is the result of a Federal navigation project 
     (including diverted flows from the Columbia River) and, if 
     the Secretary determines that the siltation is the result of 
     a Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a 
     project to mitigate the siltation as part of maintenance of 
     the Federal navigation project.

     SEC. 5151. HAMILTON ISLAND CAMPGROUND, WASHINGTON.

       The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and construct 
     a campground for Bonneville Lock and Dam at Hamilton Island 
     (also known as ``Strawberry Island'') in Skamania County, 
     Washington.

     SEC. 5152. EROSION CONTROL, PUGET ISLAND, WAHKIAKUM COUNTY, 
                   WASHINGTON.

       (a) In General.--The Lower Columbia River levees and bank 
     protection works authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 178) is modified with regard to 
     the Wahkiakum County diking districts No. 1 and 3, but 
     without regard to any cost ceiling authorized before the date 
     of enactment of this Act, to direct the Secretary to provide 
     a one-time placement of dredged material along portions of 
     the Columbia River shoreline of Puget Island, Washington, 
     between river miles 38 to 47, and the shoreline of Westport 
     Beach, Clatsop County, Oregon, between river miles 43 to 45, 
     to protect economic and environmental resources in the area 
     from further erosion.
       (b) Coordination and Cost-Sharing Requirements.--The 
     Secretary shall carry out subsection (a)--
       (1) in coordination with appropriate resource agencies; and
       (2) at Federal expense.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000.

     SEC. 5153. WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON.

       Section 545 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
     (114 Stat. 2675) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``may construct'' and 
     inserting ``shall construct''; and
       (2) by inserting ``and ecosystem restoration'' after 
     ``erosion protection'' each place it appears.

     SEC. 5154. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

       (a) Cheat and Tygart River Basins, West Virginia.--Section 
     581(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
     Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 313) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``flood control measures'' and inserting 
     ``structural and nonstructural flood control, streambank 
     protection, stormwater management, and channel clearing and 
     modification measures''; and
       (2) by inserting ``with respect to measures that 
     incorporate levees or floodwalls'' before the semicolon.
       (b) Priority Communities.--Section 581(b) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (5);
       (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and 
     inserting a semicolon; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(7) Etna, Pennsylvania, in the Pine Creek watershed; and
       ``(8) Millvale, Pennsylvania, in the Girty's Run River 
     basin.''.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 581(c) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is 
     amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$90,000,000''.

     SEC. 5155. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 571 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 371) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) by striking ``Nicholas,''; and
       (B) by striking ``Gilmer,'';
       (2) in subsection (h) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$20,000,000''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
     221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
     5b(b)), for any project undertaken under this section, a non-
     Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity with the 
     consent of the affected local government.
       ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 
     percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out this section 
     may be used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to 
     administer projects under this section at Federal expense.''.

     SEC. 5156. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

       (a) Corps of Engineers.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 113 Stat. 320) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(h) Corps of Engineers.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
     amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by 
     the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.''.
       (b) Southern West Virginia Defined.--Section 340(f) of such 
     Act is amended by inserting ``Nicholas,'' after 
     ``Greenbrier,''.

[[Page 21814]]

       (c) Nonprofit Entities.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is further amended 
     by adding at the end the following:
       ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 
     221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
     5b(b)), for any project carried out under this section, a 
     non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity with the 
     consent of the affected local government.''.

     SEC. 5157. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-
                   FEDERAL INTERESTS.

       Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(12) Perris, california.--The project for flood control, 
     Perris, California.
       ``(13) Thornton reservoir, cook county, illinois.--An 
     element of the project for flood control, Chicagoland 
     Underflow Plan, Illinois.
       ``(14) Larose to golden meadow, louisiana.--The project for 
     flood control, Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
       ``(15) Buffalo bayou, texas.--A project for flood control, 
     Buffalo Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative to the 
     project authorized by the first section of the River and 
     Harbor Act of June 20, 1938 (52 Stat. 804) and modified by 
     section 3a of the Flood Control Act of August 11, 1939 (53 
     Stat. 1414).
       ``(16) Halls bayou, texas.--A project for flood control, 
     Halls Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative to the project 
     for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and tributaries, Texas, 
     authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610).
       ``(17) Menomonee river watershed, wisconsin.--The project 
     for the Menomonee River Watershed, Wisconsin, including--
       ``(A) the Underwood Creek diversion facility project 
     (Milwaukee County Grounds); and
       ``(B) the Greater Milwaukee Rivers watershed project.''.

     SEC. 5158. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

       Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 113 Stat. 
     1494; 114 Stat. 2763A-219; 119 Stat. 2255) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (c)(5) by striking ``a project for the 
     elimination or control of combined sewer overflows'' and 
     inserting ``projects for the design, installation, 
     enhancement, or repair of sewer systems'';
       (2) in subsection (e)(1) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$32,500,000''; and
       (3) in subsection (f)--
       (A) by striking the undesignated paragraph relating to 
     Charleston, South Carolina, and inserting the following:
       ``(72) Charleston, south carolina.--$10,000,000 for 
     wastewater infrastructure, including wastewater collection 
     systems, and stormwater system improvements, Charleston, 
     South Carolina.'';
       (B) by redesignating the paragraph (71) relating to Placer 
     and El Dorado Counties, California, as paragraph (73);
       (C) by redesignating the paragraph (72) relating to Lassen, 
     Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and Nevada Counties, California, as 
     paragraph (74);
       (D) by striking the paragraph (71) relating to 
     Indianapolis, Indiana, and inserting the following:
       ``(75) Indianapolis, indiana.--$6,430,000 for environmental 
     infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indiana.'';
       (E) by redesignating the paragraph (73) relating to St. 
     Croix Falls, Wisconsin, as paragraph (76);
       (F) by redesignating paragraph (72), relating to Alpine, 
     California, as paragraph (77); and
       (G) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(78) St. clair county, alabama.--$5,000,000 for water 
     related infrastructure, St. Clair County, Alabama.
       ``(79) Crawford county, arkansas.--$35,000,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure, Crawford County, Arkansas.
       ``(80) Alameda and contra costa counties, california.--
     $25,000,000 for recycled water treatment facilities within 
     the East Bay Municipal Utility District service area, Alameda 
     and Contra Costa Counties, California.
       ``(81) Aliso creek, orange county, california.--$5,000,000 
     for water related infrastructure, Aliso Creek, Orange County, 
     California.
       ``(82) Amador county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
     wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure, Amador 
     County, California.
       ``(83) Arcadia, sierra madre, and upland, california.--
     $33,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Arcadia, 
     Sierra Madre, and Upland, California, including $13,000,000 
     for stormwater infrastructure for Upland, California.
       ``(84) Big bear area regional wastewater agency, 
     california.--$15,000,000 for water reclamation and 
     distribution infrastructure, Big Bear Area Regional 
     Wastewater Agency, California.
       ``(85) Brawley colonia, imperial county, california.--
     $1,400,000 for water infrastructure to improve water quality 
     in the Brawley Colonia Water District, Imperial County, 
     California.
       ``(86) Calaveras county, california.--$3,000,000 for water 
     supply and wastewater infrastructure improvement projects in 
     Calaveras County, California, including wastewater 
     reclamation, recycling, and conjunctive use projects.
       ``(87) Contra costa water district, california.--
     $23,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure for the 
     Contra Costa Water District, California.
       ``(88) East bay, san francisco, and santa clara areas, 
     california.--$4,000,000 for a desalination project to serve 
     the East Bay, San Francisco, and Santa Clara areas, 
     California.
       ``(89) East palo alto, california.--$4,000,000 for a new 
     pump station and stormwater management and drainage system, 
     East Palo Alto, California.
       ``(90) Imperial county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
     wastewater infrastructure, including a wastewater 
     disinfection facility and polishing system, to improve water 
     quality in the vicinity of Calexico, California, on the 
     southern New River, Imperial County, California.
       ``(91) La habra, california.--$5,000,000 for wastewater and 
     water related infrastructure, city of La Habra, California.
       ``(92) La mirada, california.--$4,000,000 for the planning, 
     design, and construction of a stormwater program in La 
     Mirada, California.
       ``(93) Los angeles county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
     wastewater and water related infrastructure, Diamond Bar, La 
     Habra Heights, and Rowland Heights, Los Angeles County, 
     California.
       ``(94) Los angeles county, california.--$20,000,000 for the 
     planning, design, and construction of water related 
     infrastructure for Santa Monica Bay and the coastal zone of 
     Los Angeles County, California.
       ``(95) Malibu, california.--$3,000,000 for municipal 
     wastewater and recycled water infrastructure, Malibu Creek 
     Watershed Protection Project, Malibu, California.
       ``(96) Montebello, california.--$4,000,000 for water 
     infrastructure improvements in south Montebello, California.
       ``(97) New river, california.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure to improve water quality in the New River, 
     California.
       ``(98) Orange county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
     wastewater and water related infrastructure, Anaheim, Brea, 
     Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, and Yorba Linda, 
     Orange County, California.
       ``(99) Port of stockton, stockton, california.--$3,000,000 
     for water and wastewater infrastructure projects for Rough 
     and Ready Island and vicinity, Stockton, California.
       ``(100) Perris, california.--$3,000,000 for recycled water 
     transmission infrastructure, Eastern Municipal Water 
     District, Perris, California.
       ``(101) San bernardino county, california.--$9,000,000 for 
     wastewater and water related infrastructure, Chino and Chino 
     Hills, San Bernardino County, California.
       ``(102) Santa clara county, california.--$5,500,000 for an 
     advanced recycling water treatment plant in Santa Clara 
     County, California.
       ``(103) Santa monica, california.--$3,000,000 for improving 
     water system reliability, Santa Monica, California.
       ``(104) Southern los angeles county, california.--
     $15,000,000 for environmental infrastructure for the 
     groundwater basin optimization pipeline, Southern Los Angeles 
     County, California.
       ``(105) Stockton, california.--$33,000,000 for water 
     treatment and distribution infrastructure, Stockton, 
     California.
       ``(106) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, 
     california.--$375,000 to improve water quality and remove 
     nonnative aquatic nuisance species from the Sweetwater 
     Reservoir, San Diego County, California.
       ``(107) Whittier, california.--$8,000,000 for water, 
     wastewater, and water related infrastructure, Whittier, 
     California.
       ``(108) Arkansas valley conduit, colorado.--$10,000,000 for 
     the Arkansas Valley Conduit, Colorado.
       ``(109) Boulder county, colorado.--$10,000,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure, Boulder County, Colorado.
       ``(110) Montezuma and la plata counties, colorado.--
     $1,000,000 for water and wastewater related infrastructure 
     for the Ute Mountain project, Montezuma and La Plata 
     Counties, Colorado.
       ``(111) Otero, bent, crowley, kiowa, and prowers counties, 
     colorado.--$35,000,000 for water transmission infrastructure, 
     Otero, Bent, Crowley, Kiowa, and Prowers Counties, Colorado.
       ``(112) Pueblo and otero counties, colorado.--$34,000,000 
     for water transmission infrastructure, Pueblo and Otero 
     Counties, Colorado.
       ``(113) Enfield, connecticut.--$1,000,000 for infiltration 
     and inflow correction, Enfield, Connecticut.
       ``(114) Ledyard and montville, connecticut.--$7,113,000 for 
     water infrastructure, Ledyard and Montville, Connecticut.
       ``(115) New haven, connecticut.--$300,000 for stormwater 
     system improvements, New Haven, Connecticut.
       ``(116) Norwalk, connecticut.--$3,000,000 for the Keeler 
     Brook Storm Water Improvement Project, Norwalk, Connecticut.
       ``(117) Plainville, connecticut.--$6,280,000 for wastewater 
     treatment, Plainville, Connecticut.
       ``(118) Southington, connecticut.--$9,420,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure, Southington, Connecticut.
       ``(119) Anacostia river, district of columbia and 
     maryland.--$20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development to enhance water quality 
     and living resources in the Anacostia River watershed, 
     District of Columbia and Maryland.
       ``(120) District of columbia.--$35,000,000 for 
     implementation of a combined sewer overflow

[[Page 21815]]

     long-term control plan in the District of Columbia.
       ``(121) Charlotte county, florida.--$3,000,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure, Charlotte County, Florida.
       ``(122) Charlotte, lee, and collier counties, florida.--
     $20,000,000 for water supply interconnectivity 
     infrastructure, Charlotte, Lee, and Collier Counties, 
     Florida.
       ``(123) Collier county, florida.--$5,000,000 for water 
     infrastructure to improve water quality in the vicinity of 
     the Gordon River, Collier County, Florida.
       ``(124) Hillsborough county, florida.--$6,250,000 for water 
     infrastructure and supply enhancement, Hillsborough County, 
     Florida.
       ``(125) Jacksonville, florida.--$25,000,000 for wastewater 
     related infrastructure, including septic tank replacements, 
     Jacksonville, Florida.
       ``(126) Sarasota county, florida.--$10,000,000 for water 
     and wastewater infrastructure in Sarasota County, Florida.
       ``(127) South seminole and north orange county, florida.--
     $30,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the South 
     Seminole and North Orange Wastewater Transmission Authority, 
     Florida.
       ``(128) Miami-dade county, florida.--$6,250,000 for water 
     reuse supply and a water transmission pipeline, Miami-Dade 
     County, Florida.
       ``(129) Palm beach county, florida.--$7,500,000 for water 
     infrastructure, Palm Beach County, Florida.
       ``(130) Albany, georgia.--$4,000,000 for a storm drainage 
     system, Albany, Georgia.
       ``(131) Banks county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
     infrastructure improvements, Banks County, Georgia.
       ``(132) Berrien county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
     infrastructure improvements, Berrien County, Georgia.
       ``(133) Chattooga county, georgia.--$8,000,000 for 
     wastewater and drinking water infrastructure improvement, 
     Chattooga County, Georgia.
       ``(134) Chattooga, floyd, gordon, walker, and whitifield 
     counties, georgia.--$10,000,000 for water infrastructure 
     improvements, Armuchee Valley, Chattooga, Floyd, Gordon, 
     Walker, and Whitifield Counties, Georgia.
       ``(135) Dahlonega, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
     infrastructure improvements, Dahlonega, Georgia.
       ``(136) East point, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
     infrastructure improvements, city of East Point, Georgia.
       ``(137) Fayetteville, grantville, lagrange, pine mountain 
     (harris county), douglasville, and carrollton, georgia.--
     $24,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
     Fayetteville, Grantville, LaGrange, Pine Mountain (Harris 
     County), Douglasville, and Carrollton, Georgia.
       ``(138) Meriwether and spalding counties, georgia.--
     $7,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
     Meriwether and Spalding Counties, Georgia.
       ``(139) Moultrie, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
     infrastructure, Moultrie, Georgia.
       ``(140) Stephens county/city of toccoa, georgia.--
     $8,000,000 water infrastructure improvements, Stephens 
     County/city of Toccoa, Georgia.
       ``(141) North vernon and butlerville, indiana.--$1,700,000 
     for wastewater infrastructure, North Vernon and Butlerville, 
     Indiana.
       ``(142) Salem, washington county, indiana.--$3,200,000 for 
     water supply infrastructure, Salem, Washington County, 
     Indiana.
       ``(143) Atchison, kansas.--$20,000,000 to address combined 
     sewer overflows, Atchison, Kansas.
       ``(144) Central kentucky.--$10,000,000 for water related 
     infrastructure and resource protection and development, 
     Scott, Franklin, Woodford, Anderson, Fayette, Mercer, 
     Jessamine, Boyle, Lincoln, Garrard, Madison, Estill, Powell, 
     Clark, Montgomery, and Bourbon Counties, Kentucky.
       ``(145) Lafayette, louisiana.--$1,200,000 for water and 
     wastewater improvements, Lafayette, Louisiana.
       ``(146) Lafourche parish, louisiana.--$2,300,000 for 
     measures to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into the 
     freshwater system, Lafourche Parish, Louisiana.
       ``(147) Lake charles, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater improvements, Lake Charles, Louisiana.
       ``(148) Northwest louisiana council of governments, 
     louisiana.--$2,000,000 for water and wastewater improvements, 
     Northwest Louisiana Council of Governments, Louisiana.
       ``(149) Ouachita parish, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for water 
     and wastewater improvements, Ouachita Parish, Louisiana.
       ``(150) Plaquemine, louisiana.--$7,000,000 for sanitary 
     sewer and wastewater infrastructure, Plaquemine, Louisiana.
       ``(151) Rapides area planning commission, louisiana.--
     $1,000,000 for water and wastewater improvements, Rapides, 
     Louisiana.
       ``(152) Shreveport, louisiana.--$20,000,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure in Shreveport, Louisiana.
       ``(153) South central planning and development commission, 
     louisiana.--$2,500,000 for water and wastewater improvements, 
     South Central Planning and Development Commission, Louisiana.
       ``(154) Union-lincoln regional water supply project, 
     louisiana.--$2,000,000 for the Union-Lincoln Regional Water 
     Supply project, Louisiana.
       ``(155) Chesapeake bay improvements, maryland, virginia, 
     and district of columbia.--$30,000,000 for environmental 
     infrastructure projects to benefit the Chesapeake Bay, 
     including the nutrient removal project at the Blue Plains 
     Wastewater Treatment facility in the District of Columbia.
       ``(156) Chesapeake bay region, maryland and virginia.--
     $40,000,000 for water pollution control, Chesapeake Bay 
     Region, Maryland and Virginia.
       ``(157) Michigan combined sewer overflows.--$35,000,000 for 
     correction of combined sewer overflows, Michigan.
       ``(158) Central iron range sanitary sewer district, 
     minnesota.--$12,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the 
     Central Iron Range Sanitary Sewer District to serve the 
     cities of Hibbing, Chisholm, Buhl, and Kinney, and Balkan and 
     Great Scott Townships, Minnesota.
       ``(159) Central lake region sanitary district, minnesota.--
     $2,000,000 for sanitary sewer and wastewater infrastructure 
     for the Central Lake Region Sanitary District, Minnesota, to 
     serve Le Grande and Moe Townships, Minnesota.
       ``(160) Goodview, minnesota.--$3,000,000 for water quality 
     infrastructure, Goodview, Minnesota.
       ``(161) Grand rapids, minnesota.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Grand Rapids, Minnesota.
       ``(162) Willmar, minnesota.--$15,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Willmar, Minnesota.
       ``(163) Biloxi, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater related infrastructure, city of Biloxi, 
     Mississippi.
       ``(164) Corinth, mississippi.--$7,500,000 for a surface 
     water program, city of Corinth, Mississippi.
       ``(165) Gulfport, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater related infrastructure, city of Gulfport, 
     Mississippi.
       ``(166) Harrison county, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water 
     and wastewater related infrastructure, Harrison County, 
     Mississippi.
       ``(167) Jackson, mississippi.--$25,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure, Jackson, Mississippi.
       ``(168) Clark county, nevada.--$30,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Clark County, Nevada.
       ``(169) Clean water coalition, nevada.--$50,000,000 for the 
     Systems Conveyance and Operations Program, Clark County, 
     Henderson, Las Vegas, and North Las Vegas, Nevada.
       ``(170) Glendale dam diversion structure, nevada.--
     $10,000,000 for water system improvements to the Glendale Dam 
     Diversion Structure for the Truckee Meadows Water Authority, 
     Nevada.
       ``(171) Henderson, nevada.--$13,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Henderson, Nevada.
       ``(172) Indian springs, nevada.--$12,000,000 for 
     construction of wastewater system improvements for the Indian 
     Springs community, Nevada.
       ``(173) Reno, nevada.--$13,000,000 for construction of a 
     water conservation project for the Highland Canal, Mogul 
     Bypass in Reno, Nevada.
       ``(174) Washoe county, nevada.--$14,000,000 for 
     construction of water infrastructure improvements to the 
     Huffaker Hills Reservoir Conservation Project, Washoe County, 
     Nevada.
       ``(175) Cranford township, new jersey.--$6,000,000 for 
     storm sewer improvements, Cranford Township, New Jersey.
       ``(176) Middletown township, new jersey.--$1,100,000 for 
     storm sewer improvements, Middletown Township, New Jersey.
       ``(177) Paterson, new jersey.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Paterson, New Jersey.
       ``(178) Rahway valley, new jersey.--$25,000,000 for 
     sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements in the service 
     area of the Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority, New Jersey.
       ``(179) Babylon, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Town of Babylon, New York.
       ``(180) Ellicottville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
     supply, water, and wastewater infrastructure in 
     Ellicottville, New York.
       ``(181) Elmira, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Elmira, New York.
       ``(182) Essex hamlet, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Essex Hamlet, New York.
       ``(183) Fleming, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking water 
     infrastructure, Fleming, New York.
       ``(184) Kiryas joel, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking 
     water infrastructure, village of Kiryas Joel, New York.
       ``(185) Niagara falls, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Niagara Falls Water Board, New York.
       ``(186) Patchogue, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, village of Patchogue, New York.
       ``(187) Sennett, new york.--$1,500,000 for water 
     infrastructure, town of Sennett, New York.
       ``(188) Springport and fleming, new york.--$10,000,000 for 
     water related infrastructure, including water mains, pump 
     stations, and water storage tanks, Springport and Fleming, 
     New York.
       ``(189) Wellsville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water supply, 
     water, and wastewater infrastructure in Wellsville, New York.
       ``(190) Yates county, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking 
     water infrastructure, Yates County, New York.
       ``(191) Cabarrus county, north carolina.--$4,500,000 for 
     water related infrastructure, Cabarrus County, North 
     Carolina.
       ``(192) Cary, wake county, north carolina.--$4,000,000 for 
     a water reclamation facility, Cary, Wake County, North 
     Carolina.

[[Page 21816]]

       ``(193) Charlotte, north carolina.--$14,000,000 for the 
     Briar Creek Relief Sewer project, city of Charlotte, North 
     Carolina.
       ``(194) Fayetteville, cumberland county, north carolina.--
     $6,000,000 for water and sewer upgrades, city of 
     Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina.
       ``(195) Mooresville, north carolina.--$4,000,000 for water 
     and wastewater infrastructure improvements, town of 
     Mooresville, North Carolina.
       ``(196) Neuse regional water and sewer authority, north 
     carolina.--$4,000,000 for the Neuse regional drinking water 
     facility, Kinston, North Carolina.
       ``(197) Richmond county, north carolina.--$13,500,000 for 
     water related infrastructure, Richmond County, North 
     Carolina.
       ``(198) Union county, north carolina.--$6,000,000 for water 
     related infrastructure, Union County, North Carolina.
       ``(199) Washington county, north carolina.--$1,000,000 for 
     water and wastewater infrastructure, Washington County, North 
     Carolina.
       ``(200) Winston-salem, north carolina.--$3,000,000 for 
     stormwater upgrades, city of Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
       ``(201) North dakota.--$15,000,000 for water-related 
     infrastructure, North Dakota.
       ``(202) Devils lake, north dakota.--$15,000,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure, Devils Lake, North Dakota.
       ``(203) Saipan, northern mariana islands.--$20,000,000 for 
     water related infrastructure, Saipan, Northern Mariana 
     Islands.
       ``(204) Akron, ohio.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Akron, Ohio
       ``(205) Burr oak regional water district, ohio.--$4,000,000 
     for construction of a water line to extend from a well field 
     near Chauncey, Ohio, to a water treatment plant near 
     Millfield, Ohio.
       ``(206) Cincinnati, ohio.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Cincinnati, Ohio.
       ``(207) Cleveland, ohio.--$2,500,000 for Flats East Bank 
     water and wastewater infrastructure, city of Cleveland, Ohio.
       ``(208) Columbus, ohio.--$4,500,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Columbus, Ohio.
       ``(209) Dayton, ohio.--$1,000,000 for water and wastewater 
     infrastructure, Dayton, Ohio.
       ``(210) Defiance county, ohio.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Defiance County, Ohio.
       ``(211) Fostoria, ohio.--$2,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Fostoria, Ohio.
       ``(212) Fremont, ohio.--$2,000,000 for construction of off-
     stream water supply reservoir, Fremont, Ohio.
       ``(213) Lake county, ohio.--$1,500,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Lake County, Ohio.
       ``(214) Lawrence county, ohio.--$5,000,000 for Union Rome 
     wastewater infrastructure, Lawrence County, Ohio.
       ``(215) Meigs county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to extend the 
     Tupper Plains Regional Water District water line to Meigs 
     County, Ohio.
       ``(216) Mentor-on-lake, ohio.--$625,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure, Mentor-on-Lake, Ohio.
       ``(217) Vinton county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to construct water 
     lines in Vinton and Brown Townships, Ohio.
       ``(218) Willowick, ohio.--$665,000 for water and wastewater 
     infrastructure, Willowick, Ohio.
       ``(219) Ada, oklahoma.--$1,700,000 for sewer improvements 
     and other water infrastructure, city of Ada, Oklahoma.
       ``(220) Alva, oklahoma.--$250,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure improvements, city of Alva, Oklahoma.
       ``(221) Ardmore, oklahoma.--$1,900,000 for water and sewer 
     infrastructure improvements, city of Ardmore, Oklahoma.
       ``(222) Bartlesville, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure, city of Bartlesville, Oklahoma.
       ``(223) Bethany, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
     improvements and water related infrastructure, city of 
     Bethany, Oklahoma.
       ``(224) Chickasha, oklahoma.--$650,000 for industrial park 
     sewer infrastructure, city of Chickasha, Oklahoma.
       ``(225) Disney and langley, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for water 
     and sewer improvements and water related infrastructure, 
     cities of Disney and Langley, Oklahoma.
       ``(226) Durant, oklahoma.--$3,300,000 for bayou restoration 
     and water related infrastructure, city of Durant, Oklahoma.
       ``(227) Eastern oklahoma state university, wilberton, 
     oklahoma.--$1,000,000 for sewer and utility upgrades and 
     water related infrastructure, Eastern Oklahoma State 
     University, Wilberton, Oklahoma.
       ``(228) Guymon, oklahoma.--$16,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater related infrastructure, city of Guymon, Oklahoma.
       ``(229) Konawa, oklahoma.--$500,000 for water treatment 
     infrastructure improvements, city of Konawa, Oklahoma.
       ``(230) Lugert-altus irrigation district, altus, 
     oklahoma.--$5,000,000 for water related infrastructure 
     improvements, Lugert-Altus Irrigation District, Altus, 
     Oklahoma.
       ``(231) Midwest city, oklahoma.--$2,000,000 for 
     improvements to water related infrastructure, the City of 
     Midwest City, Oklahoma.
       ``(232) Mustang, oklahoma.--$3,325,000 for water 
     improvements and water related infrastructure, city of 
     Mustang, Oklahoma.
       ``(233) Norman, oklahoma.--$10,000,000 for water related 
     infrastructure, Norman, Oklahoma.
       ``(234) Oklahoma panhandle state university, guymon, 
     oklahoma.--$275,000 for water testing facility and water 
     related infrastructure development, Oklahoma Panhandle State 
     University, Guymon, Oklahoma.
       ``(235) Weatherford, oklahoma.--$500,000 for arsenic 
     program and water related infrastructure, city of 
     Weatherford, Oklahoma.
       ``(236) Woodward, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
     improvements and water related infrastructure, Woodward, 
     Oklahoma.
       ``(237) Albany, oregon.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure to improve habitat restoration, Albany, 
     Oregon.
       ``(238) Beaver creek reservoir, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 
     for projects for water supply and related activities, Beaver 
     Creek Reservoir, Clarion County, Beaver and Salem Townships, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(239) Hatfield borough, pennsylvania.--$310,000 for 
     wastewater related infrastructure for Hatfield Borough, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(240) Lehigh county, pennsylvania.--$5,000,000 for 
     stormwater control measures and storm sewer improvements, 
     Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
       ``(241) North wales borough, pennsylvania.--$1,516,584 for 
     wastewater related infrastructure for North Wales Borough, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(242) Pen argyl, pennsylvania.--$5,250,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania.
       ``(243) Philadelphia, pennsylvania.--$1,600,000 for 
     wastewater related infrastructure for Philadelphia, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(244) Stockerton borough, tatamy borough, and palmer 
     township, pennsylvania.--$10,000,000 for stormwater control 
     measures, particularly to address sinkholes, in the vicinity 
     of Stockerton Borough, Tatamy Borough, and Palmer Township, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(245) Vera cruz, pennsylvania.--$5,500,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Vera Cruz, Pennsylvania.
       ``(246) Commonwealth of puerto rico.--$35,000,000 for water 
     and wastewater infrastructure in the Commonwealth of Puerto 
     Rico.
       ``(247) Charleston, south carolina.--$4,000,000 for 
     stormwater control measures and storm sewer improvements, 
     Spring Street/Fishburne Street drainage project, Charleston, 
     South Carolina.
       ``(248) Charleston and west ashley, south carolina.--
     $6,000,000 for wastewater tunnel replacement, Charleston and 
     West Ashley, South Carolina.
       ``(249) Crooked creek, marlboro county, south carolina.--
     $25,000,000 for a project for water storage and water supply 
     infrastructure on Crooked Creek, Marlboro County, South 
     Carolina.
       ``(250) Myrtle beach, south carolina.--$18,000,000 for 
     environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, 
     Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
       ``(251) North myrtle beach, south carolina.--$11,000,000 
     for environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, 
     North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
       ``(252) Surfside, south carolina.--$11,000,000 for 
     environmental infrastructure, including stormwater system 
     improvements and ocean outfalls, Surfside, South Carolina.
       ``(253) Cheyenne river sioux reservation (dewey and ziebach 
     counties) and perkins and meade counties, south dakota.--
     $65,000,000 for water related infrastructure, Cheyenne River 
     Sioux Reservation (Dewey and Ziebach counties) and Perkins 
     and Meade Counties, South Dakota.
       ``(254) Athens, tennessee.--$16,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee.
       ``(255) Blaine, tennessee.--$500,000 for water supply and 
     wastewater infrastructure, Blaine, Tennessee.
       ``(256) Claiborne county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for water 
     supply and wastewater infrastructure, Claiborne County, 
     Tennessee.
       ``(257) Giles county, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water 
     supply and wastewater infrastructure, county of Giles, 
     Tennessee.
       ``(258) Grainger county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for water 
     supply and wastewater infrastructure, Grainger County, 
     Tennessee.
       ``(259) Hamilton county, tennessee.--$500,000 for water 
     supply and wastewater infrastructure, Hamilton County, 
     Tennessee.
       ``(260) Harrogate, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water supply 
     and wastewater infrastructure, city of Harrogate, Tennessee.
       ``(261) Johnson county, tennessee.--$600,000 for water 
     supply and wastewater infrastructure, Johnson County, 
     Tennessee.
       ``(262) Knoxville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
     and wastewater infrastructure, city of Knoxville, Tennessee.
       ``(263) Nashville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
     and wastewater infrastructure, Nashville, Tennessee.
       ``(264) Lewis, lawrence, and wayne counties, tennessee.--
     $2,000,000 for water supply and wastewater infrastructure, 
     counties of Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne, Tennessee.
       ``(265) Oak ridge, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water supply 
     and wastewater infrastructure, city of Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
       ``(266) Plateau utility district, morgan county, 
     tennessee.--$1,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
     infrastructure, Morgan County, Tennessee.
       ``(267) Shelby county, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water 
     related environmental infrastructure, county of Shelby, 
     Tennessee.
       ``(268) Central texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure in Bosque, Brazos, Burleson, 
     Grimes, Hill, Hood, Johnson, Madison, McLennan, Limestone, 
     Robertson, and Somervell Counties, Texas.

[[Page 21817]]

       ``(269) El paso county, texas.--$25,000,000 for water 
     related infrastructure and resource protection, including 
     stormwater management, and development, El Paso County, 
     Texas.
       ``(270) Ft. bend county, texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure, Ft. Bend County, Texas.
       ``(271) Duchesne, iron, and uintah counties, utah.--
     $10,800,000 for water related infrastructure, Duchesne, Iron, 
     and Uintah Counties, Utah.
       ``(272) Northern west virginia.--$20,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure in Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, 
     Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, Monongalia, Marion, 
     Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Mineral, Grant, 
     Gilmer, Brooke, and Ritchie Counties, West Virginia.
       ``(273) United states virgin islands.--$25,000,000 for 
     wastewater infrastructure for the St. Croix Anguilla 
     wastewater treatment plant and the St. Thomas Charlotte 
     Amalie wastewater treatment plant, United States Virgin 
     Islands.''.
                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

     SEC. 6001. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLORIDA.

       (a) Modification.--The project for Hillsboro and Okeechobee 
     Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(16) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project 
     at a total cost of $42,500,000.
       (b) Treatment.--Section 601(b)(2)(A) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
       (1) in clause (i) by adding at the end the following: ``The 
     project for aquifer storage and recovery, Hillsboro and 
     Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(16) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
     276), shall be treated for purposes of this section as being 
     in the Plan, except that operation and maintenance costs of 
     the project shall remain a non-Federal responsibility.''; and
       (2) in clause (iii) by inserting after ``subparagraph (B)'' 
     the following: ``and the project for aquifer storage and 
     recovery, Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer''.

     SEC. 6002. PILOT PROJECTS.

       Section 601(b)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
       (1) in the matter preceding clause (i)--
       (A) by striking ``$69,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$71,200,000''; and
       (B) by striking ``$34,500,000'' each place it appears and 
     inserting ``$35,600,000''; and
       (2) in clause (i)--
       (A) by striking ``$6,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$8,200,000''; and
       (B) by striking ``$3,000,000'' each place it appears and 
     inserting ``$4,100,000''.

     SEC. 6003. MAXIMUM COSTS.

       (a) Maximum Cost of Projects.--Section 601(b)(2)(E) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2683) is 
     amended by inserting ``and section (d)'' before the period at 
     the end.
       (b) Maximum Cost of Program Authority.--Section 601(c)(3) 
     of such Act (114 Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the end 
     the following:
       ``(C) Maximum cost of program authority.--Section 902 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280) 
     shall apply to the individual project funding limits in 
     subparagraph (A) and the aggregate cost limits in 
     subparagraph (B).''.

     SEC. 6004. CREDIT.

       Section 601(e)(5)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 2000 (114 Stat. 2685) is amended--
       (1) in clause (i)--
       (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of subclause (I);
       (B) by adding ``or'' at the end of subclause (II); and
       (C) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(III) the credit is provided for work carried out before 
     the date of the partnership agreement between the Secretary 
     and the non-Federal sponsor, as defined in an agreement 
     between the Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor providing 
     for such credit;''; and
       (2) in clause (ii)--
       (A) by striking ``design agreement or the project 
     cooperation''; and
       (B) by inserting before the semicolon the following: ``, 
     including in the case of credit provided under clause 
     (i)(III) conditions relating to design and construction''.

     SEC. 6005. OUTREACH AND ASSISTANCE.

       Section 601(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     2000 (114 Stat. 2691) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(3) Maximum expenditures.--The Secretary may expend up to 
     $3,000,000 per fiscal year for fiscal years beginning after 
     September 30, 2004, to carry out this subsection.''.

     SEC. 6006. CRITICAL RESTORATION PROJECTS.

       Section 528(b)(3)(C) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1996 (110 Stat. 3769) is amended--
       (1) in clause (i) by striking ``$75,000,000'' and all that 
     follows and inserting ``$95,000,000''; and
       (2) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
       ``(ii) Federal share.--

       ``(I) In general.--Except as provided in subclause (II), 
     the Federal share of the cost of carrying out a project under 
     subparagraph (A) shall not exceed $25,000,000.
       ``(II) Seminole water conservation plan.--The Federal share 
     of the cost of carrying out the Seminole water conservation 
     plan shall not exceed $30,000,000.''.

     SEC. 6007. REGIONAL ENGINEERING MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 
                   RESTORATION.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete the 
     development and testing of the regional engineering model for 
     environmental restoration as expeditiously as practicable.
       (b) Usage.--The Secretary shall consider using, as 
     appropriate, the regional engineering model for environmental 
     restoration in the development of future water resource 
     projects, including projects developed pursuant to section 
     601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
     2680).
                   TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

     SEC. 7001. DEFINITIONS.

       In this title, the following definitions apply:
       (1) Coastal louisiana ecosystem.--The term ``coastal 
     Louisiana ecosystem'' means the coastal area of Louisiana 
     from the Sabine River on the west to the Pearl River on the 
     east, including those parts of the Atchafalaya River Basin 
     and the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain below the Old River 
     Control Structure and the Chenier Plain included within the 
     study area of the restoration plan.
       (2) Governor.--The term ``Governor'' means the Governor of 
     the State of Louisiana.
       (3) Restoration plan.--The term ``restoration plan'' means 
     the report of the Chief of Engineers for ecosystem 
     restoration for the Louisiana Coastal Area dated January 31, 
     2005.
       (4) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the Coastal 
     Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force 
     established by section 7003.
       (5) Comprehensive plan.--The term ``comprehensive plan'' 
     means the plan developed under section 7002 and any revisions 
     thereto.

     SEC. 7002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
     Governor, shall develop a comprehensive plan for protecting, 
     preserving, and restoring the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
       (b) Integration of Plan Into Comprehensive Hurricane 
     Protection Study.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the 
     Secretary shall integrate the restoration plan into the 
     analysis and design of the comprehensive hurricane protection 
     study authorized by title I of the Energy and Water 
     Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).
       (c) Consistency With Comprehensive Coastal Protection 
     Master Plan.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the 
     Secretary shall ensure that the plan is not inconsistent with 
     the goals, analysis, and design of the comprehensive coastal 
     protection master plan authorized and defined pursuant to Act 
     8 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Louisiana State 
     Legislature, 2005.
       (d) Inclusions.--The comprehensive plan shall include a 
     description of--
       (1) the framework of a long-term program integrated with 
     hurricane and storm damage reduction, flood damage reduction, 
     and navigation activities that provide for the comprehensive 
     protection, conservation, and restoration of the wetlands, 
     estuaries, barrier islands, shorelines, and related land and 
     features of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including 
     protection of critical resources, habitat, and infrastructure 
     from the effects of a coastal storm, a hurricane, erosion, or 
     subsidence;
       (2) the means by which a new technology, or an improved 
     technique, can be integrated into the program referred to in 
     paragraph (1);
       (3) the role of other Federal and State agencies and 
     programs in carrying out such program;
       (4) specific, measurable success criteria (including 
     ecological criteria) by which success of the plan will be 
     measured;
       (5) proposed projects in order of priority as determined by 
     their respective potential to contribute to--
       (A) creation of coastal wetlands; and
       (B) flood protection of communities ranked by population 
     density and level of protection; and
       (6) efforts by Federal, State, and local interests to 
     address sociological, economic, and related fields of law.
       (e) Considerations.--In developing the comprehensive plan, 
     the Secretary shall consider the advisability of integrating 
     into the program referred to in subsection (d)(1)--
       (1) an investigation and study of the maximum effective use 
     of the water and sediment of the Mississippi and Atchafalaya 
     Rivers for coastal restoration purposes consistent with flood 
     control and navigation;
       (2) a schedule for the design and implementation of large-
     scale water and sediment reintroduction projects and an 
     assessment of funding needs from any source;
       (3) an investigation and assessment of alterations in the 
     operation of the Old River Control Structure, consistent with 
     flood control and navigation purposes;
       (4) any related Federal or State project being carried out 
     on the date on which the plan is developed;
       (5) any activity in the restoration plan; and
       (6) any other project or activity identified in one or more 
     of--
       (A) the Mississippi River and Tributaries program;
       (B) the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation Plan;
       (C) the Louisiana Coastal Zone Management Plan;
       (D) the plan of the State of Louisiana entitled 
     ``Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and Hurricane Protection--
     Louisiana's Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable 
     Coast''; and
       (E) other relevant reports as determined by the Secretary.

[[Page 21818]]

       (f) Reports to Congress.--
       (1) Initial report.--Not later than 1 year after the date 
     of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
     Congress a report containing the comprehensive plan.
       (2) Updates.--Not later than 5 years after the date of 
     submission of a report under paragraph (1), and at least once 
     every 5 years thereafter until implementation of the 
     comprehensive plan is complete, the Secretary shall submit to 
     Congress a report containing an update of the plan and an 
     assessment of the progress made in implementing the plan.

     SEC. 7003. LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a program for 
     ecosystem restoration, Louisiana Coastal Area, Louisiana, 
     substantially in accordance with the report of the Chief of 
     Engineers, dated January 31, 2005.
       (b) Priorities.--
       (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under 
     subsection (a), the Secretary shall give priority to--
       (A) any portion of the program identified in the report 
     described in subsection (a) as a critical restoration 
     feature;
       (B) any Mississippi River diversion project that--
       (i) will protect a major population area of the 
     Pontchartrain, Pearl, Breton Sound, Barataria, or Terrebonne 
     basins; and
       (ii) will produce an environmental benefit to the coastal 
     Louisiana ecosystem;
       (C) any barrier island, or barrier shoreline, project 
     that--
       (i) will be carried out in conjunction with a Mississippi 
     River diversion project; and
       (ii) will protect a major population area;
       (D) any project that will reduce storm surge and prevent or 
     reduce the risk of loss of human life and the risk to public 
     safety; and
       (E) a project to physically modify the Mississippi River-
     Gulf Outlet and to restore the areas affected by the 
     Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet in accordance with the 
     comprehensive plan to be developed under section 7002(a) and 
     consistent with sections 7006(c)(1)(A) and 7013.

     SEC. 7004. COASTAL LOUISIANA ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND 
                   RESTORATION TASK FORCE.

       (a) Establishment.--There is established a task force to be 
     known as the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and 
     Restoration Task Force (in this section referred to as the 
     ``Task Force'').
       (b) Membership.--The Task Force shall consist of the 
     following members (or, in the case of the head of a Federal 
     agency, a designee of the head of the agency at the level of 
     Assistant Secretary or an equivalent level):
       (1) The Secretary.
       (2) The Secretary of the Interior.
       (3) The Secretary of Commerce.
       (4) The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
     Agency.
       (5) The Secretary of Agriculture.
       (6) The Secretary of Transportation.
       (7) The Secretary of Energy.
       (8) The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
     Agency.
       (9) The Commandant of the Coast Guard.
       (10) The Chair of the Coastal Protection and Restoration 
     Authority of Louisiana.
       (11) Two representatives of the State of Louisiana selected 
     by the Governor.
       (c) Duties.--The Task Force shall make recommendations to 
     the Secretary regarding--
       (1) policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, and 
     activities for addressing conservation, protection, 
     restoration, and maintenance of the coastal Louisiana 
     ecosystem;
       (2) financial participation by each agency represented on 
     the Task Force in conserving, protecting, restoring, and 
     maintaining the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including 
     recommendations--
       (A) that identify funds from current agency missions and 
     budgets; and
       (B) for coordinating individual agency budget requests; and
       (3) the comprehensive plan to be developed under section 
     7002(a).
       (d) Report.-- The Task Force shall submit to Congress a 
     biennial report that summarizes the activities and 
     recommendations of the Task Force.
       (e) Working Groups.--
       (1) General authority.--The Task Force may establish such 
     working groups as the Task Force determines to be necessary 
     to assist the Task Force in carrying out this section.
       (2) Hurricanes katrina and rita.--
       (A) Integration team.--The Task Force shall establish a 
     working group for the purpose of advising the Task Force of 
     opportunities to integrate the planning, engineering, design, 
     implementation, and performance of Corps of Engineers 
     projects for hurricane and storm damage reduction, flood 
     damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and navigation in 
     those areas in Louisiana for which a major disaster has been 
     declared by the President as a result of Hurricane Katrina or 
     Rita.
       (B) Expertise; representation.--In establishing the working 
     group under subparagraph (A), the Task Force shall ensure 
     that the group--
       (i) has expertise in coastal estuaries, diversions, coastal 
     restoration and wetlands protection, ecosystem restoration, 
     hurricane protection, storm damage reduction systems, 
     navigation, and ports; and
       (ii) represents the State of Louisiana and local 
     governments in southern Louisiana.
       (C) Duties.--In developing its recommendations under this 
     subsection, the working group shall--
       (i) review reports relating to the performance of, and 
     recommendations relating to the future performance of, the 
     hurricane, coastal, and flood protection systems in southern 
     Louisiana, including the reports issued by the Interagency 
     Performance Evaluation Team, the National Academy of 
     Sciences, the National Science Foundation, the American 
     Society of Civil Engineers, and Team Louisiana for the 
     purpose of advising the Task Force and the Secretary on 
     opportunities to improve the performance of the protection 
     systems;
       (ii) assist in providing reviews under section 2035; and
       (iii) carry out such other duties as the Task Force or the 
     Secretary determines to be appropriate.
       (f) Compensation.--Members of the Task Force and members of 
     a working group established by the Task Force may not receive 
     compensation for their services as members of the Task Force 
     or working group, as the case may be.
       (g) Travel Expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by members 
     of the Task Force and members of a working group established 
     by the Task Force, in the performance of their service on the 
     Task Force or working group, as the case may be, shall be 
     paid by the agency or entity that the member represents.
       (h) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory 
     Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Task 
     Force or any working group established by the Task Force.

     SEC. 7005. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.

       (a) Review.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the non-
     Federal interest of the project involved, shall review each 
     Federally-authorized water resources project in the coastal 
     Louisiana ecosystem being carried out or completed as of the 
     date of enactment of this Act to determine whether the 
     project needs to be modified--
       (1) to take into account the program authorized by section 
     7003 and the projects authorized by sections 7006(e) and 
     7013; or
       (2) to contribute to ecosystem restoration under section 
     7003, 7006(e), or 7013.
       (b) Modifications.--Subject to subsections (c) and (d), the 
     Secretary may carry out the modifications described in 
     subsection (a).
       (c) Public Notice and Comment.--Before completing the 
     report required under subsection (d), the Secretary shall 
     provide an opportunity for public notice and comment.
       (d) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Before modifying an operation or feature 
     of a project under subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit 
     to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works of the Senate a report describing the 
     modification.
       (2) Inclusion.--A report describing a modification under 
     paragraph (1) shall include such information relating to the 
     timeline for and cost of the modification, as the Secretary 
     determines to be relevant.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

     SEC. 7006. CONSTRUCTION.

       (a) Science and Technology.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out a coastal 
     Louisiana ecosystem science and technology program 
     substantially in accordance with the restoration plan at a 
     total cost of $100,000,000.
       (2) Purposes.--The purposes of the program shall be--
       (A) to identify any uncertainty relating to the physical, 
     chemical, geological, biological, and cultural baseline 
     conditions in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
       (B) to improve knowledge of the physical, chemical, 
     geological, biological, and cultural baseline conditions in 
     the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
       (C) to identify and develop technologies, models, and 
     methods to carry out this subsection; and
       (D) to advance and expedite the implementation of the 
     comprehensive plan.
       (3) Working groups.--The Secretary may establish such 
     working groups as the Secretary determines to be necessary to 
     assist the Secretary in carrying out this subsection.
       (4) Contracts and cooperative agreements.--In carrying out 
     this subsection, the Secretary may enter into a contract or 
     cooperative agreement with a consortium of academic 
     institutions in Louisiana with scientific or engineering 
     expertise in the restoration of aquatic and marine ecosystems 
     for coastal restoration and enhancement through science and 
     technology.
       (5) Applicability of the federal advisory committee act.--
     The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not 
     apply to a working group established under this subsection.
       (b) Demonstration Projects.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary 
     may carry out demonstration projects substantially in 
     accordance with the restoration plan and within the coastal 
     Louisiana ecosystem for the purpose of resolving critical 
     areas of scientific or technological uncertainty related to 
     the implementation of the comprehensive plan.
       (2) Maximum cost.--
       (A) Total cost.--The total cost for planning, design, and 
     construction of all projects under this subsection shall not 
     exceed $100,000,000.
       (B) Individual project.--The total cost of any single 
     project under this subsection shall not exceed $25,000,000.

[[Page 21819]]

       (c) Initial Projects.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
     the following projects substantially in accordance with the 
     restoration plan:
       (A) Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet environmental restoration 
     at a total cost of $105,300,000, but not including those 
     elements of the project that produce navigation benefits.
       (B) Small diversion at Hope Canal at a total cost of 
     $68,600,000.
       (C) Barataria basin barrier shoreline restoration at a 
     total cost of $242,600,000.
       (D) Small Bayou Lafourche reintroduction at a total cost of 
     $133,500,000.
       (E) Medium diversion at Myrtle Grove with dedicated 
     dredging at a total cost of $278,300,000.
       (2) Modifications.--
       (A) In general.--In carrying out each project under 
     paragraph (1), the Secretary shall carry out such 
     modifications as may be necessary to the ecosystem 
     restoration features identified in the restoration plan--
       (i) to address the impacts of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita 
     on the areas of the project; and
       (ii) to ensure consistency with the project authorized by 
     section 7013 (including work in and around the vicinity of 
     the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet).
       (B) Integration.--The Secretary shall ensure that each 
     modification under subparagraph (A) is taken into account in 
     conducting the study of comprehensive hurricane protection 
     authorized by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).
       (C) Mississippi river-gulf outlet.--In carrying out the 
     project under paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall carry out 
     such modifications as may be necessary to make the project 
     consistent with and complementary to the closure and 
     restoration of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet authorized 
     by section 7013.
       (3) Construction reports.--Before the Secretary may begin 
     construction of any project under this subsection, the 
     Secretary shall submit a report documenting any modifications 
     to the project, including cost changes, to the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate.
       (4) Applicability of other provisions.--Notwithstanding 
     section 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 2280), the cost of a project under this 
     subsection, including any modifications to the project, shall 
     not exceed 150 percent of the cost of such project set forth 
     in paragraph (1).
       (d) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, substantially in accordance 
     with the restoration plan, shall implement in the coastal 
     Louisiana ecosystem a program for the beneficial use of 
     material dredged from federally maintained waterways at a 
     total cost of $100,000,000.
       (2) Consideration.--In carrying out the program under 
     paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider the beneficial 
     use of sediment from the Illinois River System for wetlands 
     restoration in wetlands-depleted watersheds of the coastal 
     Louisiana ecosystem .
       (e) Additional Projects.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
     the following projects referred to in the restoration plan if 
     the Secretary determines such projects are feasible:
       (A) Land Bridge between Caillou Lake and the Gulf of Mexico 
     at a total cost of $56,300,000.
       (B) Gulf Shoreline at Point Au Fer Island at a total cost 
     of $43,400,000.
       (C) Modification of Caernarvon Diversion at a total cost of 
     $20,700,000.
       (D) Modification of Davis Pond Diversion at a total cost of 
     $64,200,000.
       (2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2009, the 
     Secretary shall submit feasibility reports on the projects 
     described in paragraph (1) to the Committee on Transportation 
     and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate.
       (3) Projects subject to reports.--
       (A) Feasibility reports.--Not later than December 31, 2008, 
     the Secretary shall submit to Congress feasibility reports on 
     the following projects referred to in the restoration plan:
       (i) Multipurpose Operation of Houma Navigation Lock at a 
     total cost of $18,100,000.
       (ii) Terrebonne Basin Barrier Shoreline Restoration at a 
     total cost of $124,600,000.
       (iii) Small Diversion at Convent/Blind River at a total 
     cost of $88,000,000.
       (iv) Amite River Diversion Canal Modification at a total 
     cost of $5,600,000.
       (v) Medium Diversion at White's Ditch at a total cost of 
     $86,100,000.
       (vi) Convey Atchafalaya River Water to Northern Terrebonne 
     Marshes at a total cost of $221,200,000.
       (B) Construction.--The Secretary may carry out the projects 
     under subparagraph (A) substantially in accordance with the 
     plans and subject to the conditions, recommended in a final 
     report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of the 
     Chief is completed by not later than December 31, 2010.
       (4) Construction.--No appropriations shall be made to 
     construct any project under this subsection if the report 
     under paragraph (2) or paragraph (3), as the case may be, has 
     not been approved by resolutions adopted by the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate.

     SEC. 7007. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.

       (a) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
     5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a study or 
     project under this title the cost of work carried out in the 
     coastal Louisiana ecosystem by the non-Federal interest for 
     the project before the date of the execution of the 
     partnership agreement for the study or project.
       (b) Sources of Funds.--The non-Federal interest may use, 
     and the Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a Federal 
     agency under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole 
     or in part, the non-Federal share of the cost of the study or 
     project if the Federal agency that provides the funds 
     determines that the funds are authorized to be used to carry 
     out the study or project.
       (c) Nongovernmental Organizations.--A nongovernmental 
     organization shall be eligible to contribute all or a portion 
     of the non-Federal share of the cost of a project under this 
     title.
       (d) Treatment of Credit Between Projects.--Any credit 
     provided under this section toward the non-Federal share of 
     the cost of a study or project under this title may be 
     applied toward the non-Federal share of the cost of any other 
     study or project under this title.
       (e) Periodic Monitoring.--
       (1) In general.--To ensure that the contributions of the 
     non-Federal interest equal the non-Federal share of the cost 
     of a study or project under this title during each 5-year 
     period beginning after the date of commencement of the first 
     study or project under this title, the Secretary shall--
       (A) monitor for each study or project under this title the 
     non-Federal provision of cash, in-kind services and 
     materials, and land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, 
     and disposal areas; and
       (B) manage the requirement of the non-Federal interest to 
     provide for each such study or project cash, in-kind services 
     and materials, and land, easements, rights-of-way, 
     relocations, and disposal areas.
       (2) Other monitoring.--The Secretary shall conduct 
     monitoring separately for the study phase, construction 
     phase, preconstruction engineering and design phase, and 
     planning phase for each project authorized on or after the 
     date of enactment of this Act for all or any portion of the 
     coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
       (f) Audits.--Credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, 
     relocations, and disposal areas (including land value and 
     incidental costs) provided under this section, and the cost 
     of work provided under this section, shall be subject to 
     audit by the Secretary.

     SEC. 7008. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision 
     of law, in carrying out any project or activity under this 
     title or any other provision of law to protect, conserve, and 
     restore the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, the Secretary may 
     determine that--
       (1) the project or activity is justified by the 
     environmental benefits derived by the coastal Louisiana 
     ecosystem; and
       (2) no further economic justification for the project or 
     activity shall be required if the Secretary determines that 
     the project or activity is cost effective.
       (b) Limitation on Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall not 
     apply to any separable element of a project intended to 
     produce benefits that are predominantly unrelated to the 
     protection, preservation, and restoration of the coastal 
     Louisiana ecosystem.

     SEC. 7009. INDEPENDENT REVIEW.

       The Secretary shall establish a council, to be known as the 
     ``Louisiana Water Resources Council'', which shall serve as 
     the exclusive peer review panel for activities conducted by 
     the Corps of Engineers in the areas in the State of Louisiana 
     declared as major disaster areas in accordance with section 
     401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
     Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) in response to Hurricane 
     Katrina or Rita of 2005, in accordance with the requirements 
     of section 2034.

     SEC. 7010. EXPEDITED REPORTS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of 
     the reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary 
     determines that a project is feasible, proceed directly to 
     project preconstruction engineering and design:
       (1) The projects identified in the study of comprehensive 
     hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy and 
     Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2447).
       (2) The projects identified in the Southwest Coastal 
     Louisiana hurricane and storm damage reduction study 
     authorized by the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives on December 7, 
     2005.
       (b) Submission of Reports.--Upon completion of the reports 
     identified in subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit the 
     reports to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
     the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

     SEC. 7011. REPORTING.

       Not later than 6 years after the date of enactment of this 
     Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate a report, including a description of--
       (1) the projects authorized and undertaken under this 
     title;
       (2) the construction status of the projects;
       (3) the cost to date and the expected final cost of each 
     project undertaken under this title; and

[[Page 21820]]

       (4) the benefits and environmental impacts of the projects.

     SEC. 7012. NEW ORLEANS AND VICINITY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to--
       (1) raise levee heights where necessary and otherwise 
     enhance the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity project and the 
     West Bank and Vicinity project to provide the level of 
     protection necessary to achieve the certification required 
     for a 100-year level of flood protection in accordance with 
     the national flood insurance program under the base flood 
     elevations current at the time of construction of the levee;
       (2) modify the 17th Street, Orleans Avenue, and London 
     Avenue drainage canals in the city of New Orleans and install 
     pumps and closure structures at or near the lakefront at Lake 
     Pontchartrain;
       (3) armor critical elements of the New Orleans hurricane 
     and storm damage reduction system;
       (4) modify the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to increase 
     the reliability of the flood protection system for the city 
     of New Orleans;
       (5) replace or modify certain non-Federal levees in 
     Plaquemines Parish to incorporate the levees into the New 
     Orleans to Venice Hurricane Protection project;
       (6) reinforce or replace flood walls in the existing Lake 
     Pontchartrain and Vicinity project and the existing West Bank 
     and Vicinity project to improve performance of the flood and 
     storm damage reduction systems;
       (7) perform one time stormproofing of interior pump 
     stations to ensure the operability of the stations during 
     hurricanes, storms, and high water events;
       (8) repair, replace, modify and improve non-Federal levees 
     and associated protection measures in Terrebonne Parish; and
       (9) reduce the risk of storm damage to the greater New 
     Orleans metropolitan area by restoring the surrounding 
     wetlands through measures to begin to reverse wetland losses 
     in areas affected by navigation, oil and gas, and other 
     channels and through modification of the Caernarvon 
     Freshwater Diversion structure or its operations.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--Activities authorized by subsection (a) 
     and section 7013 shall be carried out in a manner that is 
     consistent with the cost-sharing requirements specified in 
     the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, 
     the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 
     (Public Law 109-234).
       (c) Conditions.--The Secretary shall notify the Committee 
     on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate if estimates for the expenditure of funds 
     on any single project or activity identified in subsection 
     (a) exceeds the amount specified for that project or activity 
     in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, 
     the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006. No 
     appropriation in excess of 25 percent above the amount 
     specified for a project or activity in such Act may be made 
     until an increase in the level of expenditure has been 
     approved by resolutions adopted by the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate.

     SEC. 7013. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET.

       (a) Deauthorization.--
       (1) In general.--Effective beginning on the date of 
     submission of the plan required under paragraph (3), the 
     navigation channel portion of the Mississippi River-Gulf 
     Outlet element of the project for navigation, Mississippi 
     River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, authorized by the 
     Act entitled ``An Act to authorize construction of the 
     Mississippi River-Gulf outlet'', approved March 29, 1956 (70 
     Stat. 65) and modified by section 844 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4177) and section 326 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717), 
     which extends from the Gulf of Mexico to Mile 60 at the 
     southern bank of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is not 
     authorized.
       (2) Scope.--Nothing in this paragraph modifies or 
     deauthorizes the Inner Harbor navigation canal replacement 
     project authorized by that Act of March 29, 1956.
       (3) Closure and restoration plan.--
       (A) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives a final report on the 
     deauthorization of the Mississippi River-Gulf outlet, as 
     described under the heading ``Investigations'' under chapter 
     3 of title II of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations 
     Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane 
     Recovery, 2006 (120 Stat. 453).
       (B) Inclusions.--At a minimum, the report under 
     subparagraph (A) shall include--
       (i) a plan to physically modify the Mississippi River-Gulf 
     Outlet and restore the areas affected by the navigation 
     channel;
       (ii) a plan to restore natural features of the ecosystem 
     that will reduce or prevent damage from storm surge;
       (iii) a plan to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into the 
     waterway;
       (iv) efforts to integrate the recommendations of the report 
     with the program authorized under section 7003 and the 
     analysis and design authorized by title I of the Energy and 
     Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247); 
     and
       (v) consideration of--

       (I) use of native vegetation; and
       (II) diversions of fresh water to restore the Lake Borgne 
     ecosystem.

       (4) Construction.--The Secretary shall carry out a plan to 
     close the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and restore and 
     protect the ecosystem substantially in accordance with the 
     plan required under paragraph (3), if the Secretary 
     determines that the project is cost-effective, 
     environmentally acceptable, and technically feasible.

     SEC. 7014. HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION.

       (a) Reports.--With respect to the projects identified in 
     the analysis and design of comprehensive hurricane protection 
     authorized by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247), the Secretary 
     shall submit, to the maximum extent practicable, specific 
     project recommendations in a report developed under that 
     title.
       (b) Emergency Procedures.--
       (1) In general.--If the President determines that a project 
     recommended in the analysis and design of comprehensive 
     hurricane protection under title I of the Energy and Water 
     Development Appropriations Act, 2006 could--
       (A) address an imminent threat to life and property;
       (B) prevent a dangerous storm surge from reaching a 
     populated area;
       (C) prevent the loss of coastal areas that reduce the 
     impact of storm surge;
       (D) benefit national energy security;
       (E) protect emergency hurricane evacuation routes or 
     shelters; or
       (F) address inconsistencies in hurricane protection 
     standards,
     the President may submit to the President pro tempore of the 
     Senate for authorization a legislative proposal relating to 
     the project, as the President determines to be appropriate.
       (2) Prioritization.--In submitting legislative proposals 
     under paragraph (1), the President shall give priority to any 
     project that, as determined by the President, would--
       (A) to the maximum extent practicable, reduce the risk--
       (i) of loss of human life;
       (ii) to public safety; and
       (iii) of damage to property; and
       (B) minimize costs and environmental impacts.
       (3) Expedited consideration.--
       (A) In general.--Beginning after December 31, 2008, any 
     legislative proposal submitted by the President under 
     paragraph (1) shall be eligible for expedited consideration 
     in accordance with this paragraph.
       (B) Introduction.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
     receipt of a legislative proposal under paragraph (1), the 
     Chairman of the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
     the Senate shall introduce the proposal as a bill, by 
     request, in the Senate.
       (C) Referral.--A bill introduced under subparagraph (B) 
     shall be referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate.
       (D) Committee consideration.--
       (i) In general.--Not later than 45 legislative days after a 
     bill under subparagraph (B) is referred to the committee in 
     accordance with subparagraph (C), the committee shall act on 
     the bill.
       (ii) Failure to act.--If the committee fails to act on a 
     bill by the date specified in clause (i), the bill shall be 
     discharged from the committee and placed on the calendar of 
     the Senate.
       (4) Effective date.--The requirements of, and authorities 
     under, this subsection shall expire on December 31, 2010.

     SEC. 7015. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW.

       (a) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
     the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives a report describing any modification 
     required to the project for flood damage reduction, Larose to 
     Golden Meadow, Louisiana, to provide the level of protection 
     necessary to achieve the certification required for a 100-
     year level of flood protection in accordance with the 
     national flood insurance program.
       (b) Modifications.--The Secretary is authorized to carry 
     out a modification described in subsection (a) if--
       (1) the Secretary determines that the modification in the 
     report under subsection (a) is feasible; and
       (2) the total cost of the modification does not exceed 
     $90,000,000.
       (c) Requirement.--No appropriation shall be made to 
     construct any modification under this section if the report 
     under subsection (a) has not been approved by resolutions 
     adopted by the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
     the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

     SEC. 7016. LOWER JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for 
     flood damage reduction in Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.
       (b) Existing Studies.--In carrying out the project, the 
     Secretary shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, 
     existing studies for projects for flood damage reduction in 
     the vicinity of Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, prepared 
     under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
     701s).
       (c) Construction.--The Secretary may proceed to 
     construction or complete the construction of projects in 
     Lower Jefferson Parish if the projects are being developed or 
     carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
     1948 as of the date of enactment of this Act.

[[Page 21821]]

       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $100,000,000 to carry out this section.
   TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

     SEC. 8001. DEFINITIONS.

       In this title, the following definitions apply:
       (1) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the project for 
     navigation and ecosystem improvements for the Upper 
     Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers, dated December 15, 2004.
       (2) Upper mississippi river and illinois waterway system.--
     The term ``Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
     System'' means the projects for navigation and ecosystem 
     restoration authorized by Congress for--
       (A) the segment of the Mississippi River from the 
     confluence with the Ohio River, River Mile 0.0, to Upper St. 
     Anthony Falls Lock in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, River 
     Mile 854.0; and
       (B) the Illinois Waterway from its confluence with the 
     Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, River Mile 0.0, to 
     T.J. O'Brien Lock in Chicago, Illinois, River Mile 327.0.

     SEC. 8002. NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS AND RESTORATION.

       Except as modified by this title, the Secretary shall 
     undertake navigation improvements and restoration of the 
     ecosystem for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois 
     Waterway System substantially in accordance with the Plan and 
     subject to the conditions described therein.

     SEC. 8003. AUTHORIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF NAVIGATION 
                   IMPROVEMENTS.

       (a) Small Scale and Nonstructural Measures.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
       (A) construct mooring facilities at Locks 12, 14, 18, 20, 
     22, 24, and LaGrange Lock or other alternative locations that 
     are economically and environmentally feasible;
       (B) provide switchboats at Locks 20 through 25; and
       (C) conduct development and testing of an appointment 
     scheduling system.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total cost of 
     projects authorized under this subsection shall be 
     $256,000,000. Such costs are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
     appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
     from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust 
     Fund. Such sums shall remain available until expended.
       (b) New Locks.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall construct new 1,200-
     foot locks at Locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on the Upper 
     Mississippi River and at LaGrange Lock and Peoria Lock on the 
     Illinois Waterway.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total cost of 
     projects authorized under this subsection shall be 
     $1,948,000,000. Such costs are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
     appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
     from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust 
     Fund. Such sums shall remain available until expended.
       (c) Concurrence.--The mitigation required for the projects 
     authorized under subsections (a) and (b), including any 
     acquisition of lands or interests in lands, shall be 
     undertaken or acquired concurrently with lands and interests 
     in lands for the projects authorized under subsections (a) 
     and (b), and physical construction required for the purposes 
     of mitigation shall be undertaken concurrently with the 
     physical construction of such projects.

     SEC. 8004. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AUTHORIZATION.

       (a) Operation.--To ensure the environmental sustainability 
     of the existing Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
     System, the Secretary shall modify, consistent with 
     requirements to avoid adverse effects on navigation, the 
     operation of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois 
     Waterway System to address the cumulative environmental 
     impacts of operation of the system and improve the ecological 
     integrity of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River.
       (b) Ecosystem Restoration Projects.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, consistent 
     with requirements to avoid adverse effects on navigation, 
     ecosystem restoration projects to attain and maintain the 
     sustainability of the ecosystem of the Upper Mississippi 
     River and Illinois River in accordance with the general 
     framework outlined in the Plan.
       (2) Projects included.--Ecosystem restoration projects may 
     include--
       (A) island building;
       (B) construction of fish passages;
       (C) floodplain restoration;
       (D) water level management (including water drawdown);
       (E) backwater restoration;
       (F) side channel restoration;
       (G) wing dam and dike restoration and modification;
       (H) island and shoreline protection;
       (I) topographical diversity;
       (J) dam point control;
       (K) use of dredged material for environmental purposes;
       (L) tributary confluence restoration;
       (M) spillway, dam, and levee modification to benefit the 
     environment; and
       (N) land and easement acquisition.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) 
     and (C), the Federal share of the cost of carrying out an 
     ecosystem restoration project under this subsection shall be 
     65 percent.
       (B) Exception for certain restoration projects.--In the 
     case of a project under this section for ecosystem 
     restoration, the Federal share of the cost of carrying out 
     the project shall be 100 percent if the project--
       (i) is located below the ordinary high water mark or in a 
     connected backwater;
       (ii) modifies the operation of structures for navigation; 
     or
       (iii) is located on federally owned land.
       (C) Savings clause.--Nothing in this subsection affects the 
     applicability of section 906(e) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(e)).
       (D) Nongovernmental organizations.--In accordance with 
     section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
     1962d-5b), for any project carried out under this title, a 
     non-Federal sponsor may include a nonprofit entity, with the 
     consent of the affected local government.
       (4) Land acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire land or an 
     interest in land for an ecosystem restoration project from a 
     willing seller through conveyance of--
       (A) fee title to the land; or
       (B) a flood plain conservation easement.
       (c) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall carry out a long term 
     resource monitoring, computerized data inventory and 
     analysis, and applied research program for the Upper 
     Mississippi River and Illinois River to determine trends in 
     ecosystem health, to understand systemic changes, and to help 
     identify restoration needs. The program shall consider and 
     adopt the monitoring program established under section 
     1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(1)(A)(ii)).
       (d) Ecosystem Restoration Preconstruction Engineering and 
     Design.--
       (1) Restoration design.--Before initiating the construction 
     of any individual ecosystem restoration project, the 
     Secretary shall--
       (A) establish ecosystem restoration goals and identify 
     specific performance measures designed to demonstrate 
     ecosystem restoration;
       (B) establish the without-project condition or baseline for 
     each performance indicator; and
       (C) for each separable element of the ecosystem 
     restoration, identify specific target goals for each 
     performance indicator.
       (2) Outcomes.--Performance measures identified under 
     paragraph (1)(A) shall include specific measurable 
     environmental outcomes, such as changes in water quality, 
     hydrology, or the well-being of indicator species the 
     population and distribution of which are representative of 
     the abundance and diversity of ecosystem-dependent aquatic 
     and terrestrial species.
       (3) Restoration design.--Restoration design carried out as 
     part of ecosystem restoration shall include a monitoring plan 
     for the performance measures identified under paragraph 
     (1)(A), including--
       (A) a timeline to achieve the identified target goals; and
       (B) a timeline for the demonstration of project completion.
       (e) Consultation and Funding Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--In carrying out the environmental 
     sustainability, ecosystem restoration, and monitoring 
     activities authorized in this section, the Secretary shall 
     consult with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of 
     Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.
       (2) Funding agreements.--The Secretary is authorized to 
     enter into agreements with the Secretary of the Interior, the 
     Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, and natural 
     resource and conservation agencies of the States of Illinois, 
     Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin to provide for the 
     direct participation of and transfer of funds to such 
     entities for the planning, implementation, and evaluation of 
     projects and programs established by this section.
       (f) Specific Projects Authorization.--
       (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
     carry out this subsection $1,717,000,000, of which not more 
     than $245,000,000 shall be available for projects described 
     in subsection (b)(2)(B) and not more than $48,000,000 shall 
     be available for projects described in subsection (b)(2)(J). 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.
       (2) Limitation on available funds.--Of the amounts made 
     available under paragraph (1), not more than $35,000,000 in 
     any fiscal year may be used for land acquisition under 
     subsection (b)(4).
       (3) Individual project limit.--Other than for projects 
     described in subparagraphs (B) and (J) of subsection (b)(2), 
     the total cost of any single project carried out under this 
     subsection shall not exceed $25,000,000.
       (4) Monitoring.--In addition to amounts authorized under 
     paragraph (1), there are authorized $10,420,000 per fiscal 
     year to carry out the monitoring program under subsection (c) 
     if such sums are not appropriated pursuant to section 
     1103(e)(4) the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
     U.S.C. 652(e)(4)).
       (g) Implementation Reports.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than June 30, 2009, and every 4 
     years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 
     on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
     of Representatives an implementation report that--
       (A) includes baselines, milestones, goals, and priorities 
     for ecosystem restoration projects; and
       (B) measures the progress in meeting the goals.
       (2) Advisory panel.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary shall appoint and convene an 
     advisory panel to provide independent guidance in the 
     development of each implementation report under paragraph 
     (1).

[[Page 21822]]

       (B) Panel members.--Panel members shall include--
       (i) one representative of each of the State resource 
     agencies (or a designee of the Governor of the State) from 
     each of the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, 
     and Wisconsin;
       (ii) one representative of the Department of Agriculture;
       (iii) one representative of the Department of 
     Transportation;
       (iv) one representative of the United States Geological 
     Survey;
       (v) one representative of the United States Fish and 
     Wildlife Service;
       (vi) one representative of the Environmental Protection 
     Agency;
       (vii) one representative of affected landowners;
       (viii) two representatives of conservation and 
     environmental advocacy groups; and
       (ix) two representatives of agriculture and industry 
     advocacy groups.
       (C) Chairperson.--The Secretary shall serve as chairperson 
     of the advisory panel.
       (D) Application of federal advisory committee act.--The 
     Advisory Panel and any working group established by the 
     Advisory Panel shall not be considered an advisory committee 
     under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
       (h) Ranking System.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     Advisory Panel, shall develop a system to rank proposed 
     projects.
       (2) Priority.--The ranking system shall give greater weight 
     to projects that restore natural river processes, including 
     those projects listed in subsection (b)(2).

     SEC. 8005. COMPARABLE PROGRESS.

       (a) In General.--As the Secretary conducts pre-engineering, 
     design, and construction for projects authorized under this 
     title, the Secretary shall--
       (1) select appropriate milestones;
       (2) determine, at the time of such selection, whether the 
     projects are being carried out at comparable rates; and
       (3) make an annual report to Congress, beginning in fiscal 
     year 2009, regarding whether the projects are being carried 
     out at a comparable rate.
       (b) No Comparable Rate.--If the Secretary or Congress 
     determines under subsection (a)(2) that projects authorized 
     under this title are not moving toward completion at a 
     comparable rate, annual funding requests for the projects 
     shall be adjusted to ensure that the projects move toward 
     completion at a comparable rate in the future.
                TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM

     SEC. 9001. SHORT TITLE.

       This title may be cited as the ``National Levee Safety Act 
     of 2007''.

     SEC. 9002. DEFINITIONS.

       In this title, the following definitions apply:
       (1) Committee.--The term ``committee'' means the Committee 
     on Levee Safety established by section 9003(a).
       (2) Inspection.--The term ``inspection'' means an actual 
     inspection of a levee--
       (A) to establish the global information system location of 
     the levee;
       (B) to determine the general condition of the levee; and
       (C) to estimate the number of structures and population at 
     risk and protected by the levee that would be adversely 
     impacted if the levee fails or water levels exceed the height 
     of the levee.
       (3) Levee.--
       (A) In general.--The term ``levee'' means an embankment, 
     including floodwalls--
       (i) the primary purpose of which is to provide hurricane, 
     storm, and flood protection relating to seasonal high water, 
     storm surges, precipitation, and other weather events; and
       (ii) that normally is subject to water loading for only a 
     few days or weeks during a year.
       (B) Inclusion.--The term includes structures along canals 
     that constrain water flows and are subject to more frequent 
     water loadings but that do not constitute a barrier across a 
     watercourse.
       (4) State.--The term ``State'' means--
       (A) a State;
       (B) the District of Columbia;
       (C) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and
       (D) any other territory or possession of the United States.
       (5) State levee safety agency.--The term ``State levee 
     safety agency'' means the agency of a State that has 
     regulatory authority over the safety of any non-Federal levee 
     in the State.
       (6) United states.--The term ``United States'', when used 
     in a geographical sense, means all of the States.

     SEC. 9003. COMMITTEE ON LEVEE SAFETY.

       (a) Establishment.--There is established a committee to be 
     known as the ``Committee on Levee Safety''.
       (b) Membership.--The committee shall be composed of 16 
     members as follows:
       (1) The Secretary (or the Secretary's designee), who shall 
     serve as the chairperson of the Committee.
       (2) The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
     Agency (or the Administrator's designee).
       (3) The following 14 members appointed by the Secretary:
       (A) 8 representatives of State levee safety agencies, one 
     from each of the 8 civil works divisions of the Corps of 
     Engineers.
       (B) 2 representatives of the private sector who have 
     expertise in levee safety.
       (C) 2 representatives of local and regional governmental 
     agencies who have expertise in levee safety.
       (D) 2 representatives of Indian tribes who have expertise 
     in levee safety.
       (c) Duties.--
       (1) Development of recommendations for national levee 
     safety program.--The committee shall develop recomendations 
     for a national levee safety program, including a strategic 
     plan for implementation of the program.
       (2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the committee shall submit to the 
     Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
     of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on 
     Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
     containing the recommendations developed under paragraph (1).
       (d) Purposes.--In developing recommendations under 
     subsection (c)(1), the committee shall ensure that the 
     national levee safety program meets the following goals:
       (1) Ensuring the protection of human life and property by 
     levees through the development of technologically, 
     economically, socially, and environmentally feasible programs 
     and procedures for hazard reduction and mitigation relating 
     to levees.
       (2) Encouraging use of the best available engineering 
     policies and procedures for levee site investigation, design, 
     construction, operation and maintenance, and emergency 
     preparedness.
       (3) Encouraging the establishment and implementation of an 
     effective national levee safety program that may be delegated 
     to qualified States for implementation, including 
     identification of incentives and disincentives for State 
     levee safety programs.
       (4) Ensuring that levees are operated and maintained in 
     accordance with appropriate and protective standards by 
     conducting an inventory and inspection of levees.
       (5) Developing and supporting public education and 
     awareness projects to increase public acceptance and support 
     of State and national levee safety programs.
       (6) Building public awareness of the residual risks 
     associated with living in levee protected areas.
       (7) Developing technical assistance materials for State and 
     national levee safety programs.
       (8) Developing methods to provide technical assistance 
     relating to levee safety to non-Federal entities.
       (9) Developing technical assistance materials, seminars, 
     and guidelines relating to the physical integrity of levees 
     in the United States.
       (e) Compensation of Members.--A member of the committee 
     shall serve without compensation.
       (f) Travel Expenses.--To the extent amounts are made 
     available in advance in appropriations Acts, the Secretary 
     shall reimburse a member of the committee for travel 
     expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates 
     authorized for an employee of a Federal agency under 
     subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, 
     while away from the home or regular place of business of the 
     member in performance of services for the committee.
       (g) Applicability of Federal Advisory Committee Act.--The 
     Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not 
     apply to the committee.

     SEC. 9004. INVENTORY AND INSPECTION OF LEVEES.

       (a) Levee Database.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish and 
     maintain a database with an inventory of the Nation's levees.
       (2) Contents.--The database shall include--
       (A) location information of all Federal levees in the 
     Nation (including global information system information) and, 
     for non-Federal levees, such information on levee location as 
     is provided to the Secretary by State and local governmental 
     agencies;
       (B) utilizing such information as is available, the general 
     condition of each levee; and
       (C) an estimate of the number of structures and population 
     at risk and protected by each levee that would be adversely 
     impacted if the levee fails or water levels exceed the height 
     of the levee.
       (3) Availability of information.--
       (A) Availability to federal, state, and local governmental 
     agencies.--The Secretary shall make all of the information in 
     the database available to appropriate Federal, State, and 
     local governmental agencies.
       (B) Availability to the public.--The Secretary shall make 
     the information in the database described in paragraph 
     (2)(A), and such other information in the database as the 
     Secretary determines appropriate, available to the public.
       (b) Inventory and Inspection of Levees.--
       (1) Federal levees.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, 
     shall establish an inventory and conduct an inspection of all 
     federally owned and operated levees.
       (2) Federally constructed, nonfederally operated and 
     maintained levees.--The Secretary shall establish an 
     inventory and conduct an inspection of all federally 
     constructed, non-federally operated and maintained levees, at 
     the original cost share for the project.
       (3) Participating levees.--For non-Federal levees the 
     owners of which are participating in the emergency response 
     to natural disasters program established under section 5 of 
     the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of 
     certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, 
     and for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 
     701n), the Secretary shall establish an inventory and conduct 
     an inspection of each such levee if the owner of the

[[Page 21823]]

     levee requests such inspection. The Federal share of the cost 
     of an inspection under this paragraph shall be 65 percent.

     SEC. 9005. LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.

       Nothing in this title shall be construed as--
       (1) creating any liability of the United States or its 
     officers or employees for the recovery of damages caused by 
     an action or failure to act; or
       (2) relieving an owner or operator of a levee of a legal 
     duty, obligation, or liability incident to the ownership or 
     operation of a levee.

     SEC. 9006. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

       There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to 
     carry out this title $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
     2008 through 2013.
       And the Senate agree to the same.

     From the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for 
     consideration of the House bill and the Senate amendment, and 
     modifications committed to conference:
     James L. Oberstar,
     Eddie Bernice Johnson,
     Ellen O. Tauscher,
     Brian Baird,
     Brian Higgins,
     Harry E. Mitchell,
     Steve Kagen,
     Jerry McNerney,
     John L. Mica,
     John J. Duncan, Jr.,
     Vernon J. Ehlers,
     R.H. Baker,
     Henry E. Brown, Jr.,
     John Boozman,
     From the Committee on Natural Resources, for consideration of 
     secs. 2014, 2023, and 6009 of the House bill and secs. 3023, 
     5008, and 5016 of the Senate amendment, and modifications 
     committed to conference:
     Nick Rahall,
     Grace F. Napolitano,
     Cathy McMorris Rodgers,
                                Managers on the Part of the House.

     Barbara Boxer,
     Max Baucus,
     Joe Lieberman,
     Tom Carper,
     Hillary Rodham Clinton,
     Frank R. Lautenberg,
     James M. Inhofe,
     John Warner,
     George V. Voinovich,
     Johnny Isakson,
     David Vitter,
                               Managers on the Part of the Senate.

       JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE

       The managers on the part of the House and the Senate at the 
     conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the 
     amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 1495) to provide 
     for the conservation and development of water and related 
     resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to 
     construct various projects for improvements to rivers and 
     harbors of the United States, and for other purposes, submit 
     the following joint statement to the House and the Senate in 
     explanation of the effect of the action agreed upon by the 
     managers and recommended in the accompanying conference 
     report:
       The Senate amendment struck all of the House bill after the 
     enacting clause and inserted a substitute text.
       The House recedes from its disagreement to the amendment of 
     the Senate with an amendment that is a substitute for the 
     House bill and the Senate amendment. The differences between 
     the House bill, the Senate amendment, and the substitute 
     agreed to in conference are noted below, except for clerical 
     corrections, conforming changes made necessary by agreements 
     reached by the conferees, and minor drafting and clarifying 
     changes.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS


                  SECTION 1001--PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS

       1001(1). Haines, Alaska. House Sec. 1001(1), Senate 
     Sec. 1001(1).--Senate recedes.
       1001(2). Port Lions, Alaska. House Sec. 1001(2). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1001(3). Santa Cruz River, Paseo de Las Iglesias, Arizona. 
     House Sec. 1001(4). No comparable Senate Section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1001(4). Tanque Verde Creek, Pima County, Arizona. House 
     Sec. 1001(5), Senate Sec. 1001(2).--House recedes.
       1001(5). Salt River (Rio Salado Oeste), Maricopa County, 
     Arizona. House Sec. 1001(3). No comparable Senate section.--
     Senate recedes.
       1001(6). Salt River (Va Shly'ay Akimel), Maricopa County, 
     Arizona. House Sec. 1001(6), Senate Sec. 1001(3).--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       1001(7). May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas. House 
     Sec. 1001(7), Senate Sec. 1001(4).--House recedes.
       1001(8). Hamilton City, Glenn County, California. House 
     Sec. 1001(8), Senate Sec. 1001(5).--House recedes.
       1001(9). Silver Strand Shoreline, Imperial Beach, 
     California. House Sec. 1001(9), Senate 1001(6).--House 
     recedes.
       1001(10). Matilija Dam, Ventura County, California. House 
     Sec. 1001(10), Senate 1001(7).--House recedes.
       1001(11). Middle Creek, Lake County, California. House 
     Sec. 1001(11), Senate 1001 Sec. 1001(8).--House recedes.
       1001(12). Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration, California. 
     House Sec. 1001(12), Senate Sec. 1001(9).--Senate recedes.
       1001(13). Denver County Reach, South Platte River, Denver, 
     Colorado. House Sec. 1001(13), Senate Sec. 1001(10).--Senate 
     recedes.
       1001(14). Central and Southern Florida, Indian River 
     Lagoon. House Sec. 6005, Senate Sec. 1001 (12).--House 
     recedes.
       1001(15). Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, 
     Central and Southern Florida, Picayune Strand Restoration 
     Project, Collier County, Florida. House Sec. 6005, Senate 
     Sec. 1001(14).--House recedes.
       1001(16). Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, 
     Central and Southern Florida, Site 1 Impoundment Project, 
     Palm Beach County, Florida. House Sec. 6005, Senate 
     Sec. 1001(11).--House recedes.
       1001(17). Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida. House 
     Sec. 1001(14), Senate Sec. 1001(13).--Senate recedes.
       1001(18). East St. Louis and Vicinity, Illinois. House 
     Sec. 1001(15), Senate Sec. 1001(15).--Senate recedes.
       1001(19). Peoria Riverfront Development, Illinois. House 
     Sec. 1001(16), Senate Sec. 1001(16).--House recedes.
       1001(20). Wood River Levee System Reconstruction, Madison 
     County, Illinois. House Sec. 1001(17), Senate 1001(17).--
     House recedes.
       1001(21). Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa. 
     House Sec. 1001(18), Senate 1001(18).--Senate recedes.
       1001(22). Licking River Basin, Cynthiana, Kentucky. House 
     Sec. 1001(19). No comparable Senate Section.--Senate recedes.
       1001(23). Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana. House 
     Sec. 1001(20), Senate 1001(19).--House recedes.
       1001(24). Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana. House 
     Sec. 1001(21), Senate Sec. 1001(20).--House recedes.
       1001(25). Port of Iberia, Louisiana. House Sec. 1001(22), 
     Senate Sec. 1001(21).--House recedes, with an amendment.
       1001(26). Smith Island, Somerset County, Maryland. House 
     Sec. 1001(23), Senate Sec. 1001(23).--House recedes.
       1001(27). Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota. House 
     Sec. 1001(24), Senate Sec. 1001(24).--Senate recedes.
       1001(28). Argentine, East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, 
     and North Kansas Levees Units, Missouri River and Tributaries 
     at Kansas Cities, Missouri and Kansas. House Sec. 1001(26), 
     Senate Sec. 1001(26).--House recedes.
       1001(29). Swope Park Industrial Area, Blue River, Kansas 
     City, Missouri. House Sec. 1001(27), Senate Sec. 1001(27).--
     Senate recedes.
       1001(30). Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Townsends Inlet, New 
     Jersey. House Sec. 1001(28), Senate 1001(28).--House recedes.
       1001(31). Hudson Raritan Estuary, Liberty State Park, New 
     Jersey. House Sec. 1001(29), Senate Sec. 1001(29).--Senate 
     recedes.
       1001(32). New Jersey Shore Protection Study, Manasquan 
     Inlet to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey. House Sec. 1001(30), 
     Senate Sec. 1001(30).--Senate recedes.
       1001(33). Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Union Beach, New 
     Jersey. House Sec. 1001(31), Senate Sec. 1001(31).--House 
     recedes.
       1001(34). South River, Raritan River Basin, New Jersey. 
     House Sec. 1001(32), Senate Sec. 1001(32).--House recedes.
       1001(35). Southwest Valley, Bernalillo County, New Mexico. 
     House Sec. 1001(33), Senate Sec. 1001(33).--House recedes.
       1001(36). Montauk Point, New York. House Sec. 1001(34), 
     Senate Sec. 1001(34).--Senate recedes.
       1001(37). Hocking River Basin, Monday Creek, Ohio. House 
     Sec. 1001(35), Senate Sec. 1001(35).--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       1001(38). Town of Bloomsburg, Columbia County, 
     Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1001(36), Senate Sec. 1001(36).--
     Senate recedes.
       1001(39). Pawleys Island, South Carolina. House 
     Sec. 1001(37), Senate Sec. 1001(37).--Senate recedes.
       1001(40). Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, 
     Texas. House Sec. 1001(38), Senate 1001(38).--Senate recedes, 
     with an amendment.
       1001(41). Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to Port 
     O'Connor, Matagorda Bay Re-Route, Texas. House Sec. 1001(39), 
     Senate Sec. 1001(39).--House recedes.
       1001(42). Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, High Island to Brazos 
     River, Texas. House Sec. 1001(40), Senate Sec. 1001(40).--
     House recedes.
       1001(43). Lower Colorado River Basin Phase I, Texas. House 
     Sec. 1001(41), Senate Sec. 1001(41).--Senate recedes.
       1001(44). Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge 
     Replacement, Deep Creek, Chesapeake, Virginia. House 
     Sec. 1001(43), Senate Sec. 1001(43).--Senate recedes.
       1001(45). Craney Island Eastward Expansion, Norfolk Harbor 
     and Channels, Hampton Roads, Virginia. House Sec. 1001(44), 
     Senate Sec. 1001(42).--House recedes, with an amendment.
       1001(46). Centralia, Chehalis River, Lewis County, 
     Washington. Senate Sec. 1001(44). No comparable House 
     section.--House recedes.


          SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION

       1002(a)(1). Haleyville, Alabama. House Sec. 1002(a)(1). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(2). Weiss Lake, Alabama. House Sec. 1002(a)(2). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(3). Fort Yukon, Alaska. House Sec. 5032. No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.

[[Page 21824]]

       1002(a)(4). Little Colorado River Levee, Arizona. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(3). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(5). Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(4), Senate Sec. 1004(1).--Same.
       1002(a)(6). Barrel Springs Wash, Palmdale, California. 
     House Sec. 1002(a)(5). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(7). Borrego Springs, California. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(6). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(8). Colton, California. House Sec. 1002(a)(7). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(9). Dunlap Stream, Yucaipa, California. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(8). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(10). Hunts Canyon Wash, Palmdale, California. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(9). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(11). Ontario and Chino, California. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(10). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(12). Santa Venetia, California. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(11). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(13). Whittier, California. House Sec. 1002(a)(12). 
     No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(14). Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, California. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(13). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(15). Bibb County and City of Macon Levee, Georgia. 
     Senate Sec. 1004(2). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(16). Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana. Senate 
     Sec. 1004(3). House Sec. 3051.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       1002(a)(17). St. Francisville, Louisiana. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(14). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(18). Salem, Massachusetts. House Sec. 1002(a)(15), 
     Senate 1004(4).--Same.
       1002(a)(19). Cass River, Michigan. House Sec. 1002(a)(16). 
     No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(20). Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(17), Senate Sec. 1004(5).--Same.
       1002(a)(21). Marsh Creek, Minnesota. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(18). No comparable Senate Section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(22). South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, 
     Minnesota. House Sec. 1002(a)(19), Senate Sec. 1004(6).--
     Same.
       1002(a)(23). Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(20). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(24). Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(21). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(25). Canisteo River, Addison, New York. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(22). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(26). Cohocton River, Campbell, New York. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(23). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(27). Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland, New York. 
     House Sec. 1002(a)(24). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(28). East River, Silver Beach, New York City, New 
     York. House Sec. 1002(a)(25). No comparable Senate section.--
     Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(29). East Valley Creek, Andover, New York. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(26). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(30). Sunnyside Brook, Westchester County, New York. 
     House Sec. 1002(a)(27). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(31). Little Yankee and Mud Run, Trumbull County, 
     Ohio. House Sec. 1002(a)(28). No comparable Senate section.--
     Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(32). Little Neshaminy Creek, Warrington, 
     Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1002(a)(29). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(33). Southampton Creek Watershed, Southampton, 
     Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1002(a)(30). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(34). Spring Creek, Lower Macungie Township, 
     Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1002(a)(31). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(35). Yardley Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, 
     Yardley, Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1002(a)(32). No comparable 
     Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(36). Surfside Beach, South Carolina. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(33). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(37). Sandy Creek, Jackson County, Tennessee. Senate 
     Sec. 3113. No comparable House section.--House recedes, with 
     an amendment.
       1002(a)(38). Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, Texas. House 
     Sec. 1002(a)(34). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1002(a)(39). Dilley, Texas. House Sec. 1002(a)(35). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1002(a)(40). Cheyenne, Wyoming. Senate Sec. 1004(7). No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.


     SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION

       1003(1). Aliso Creek, California. House Sec. 1003(1). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(2). St. Johns Bluff Training Wall, Duval County, 
     Florida. House Sec. 1003(2). No comparable Senate section.--
     Senate recedes.
       1003(3). Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Iberville Parish, 
     Louisiana. House Sec. 1003(3). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(4). Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana. 
     House Sec. 1003(4). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1003(5). Piney Point Lighthouse, St. Mary's County, 
     Maryland. House Sec. 1003(5). No comparable Senate section.--
     Senate recedes.
       1003(6). Pug Hole Lake, Minnesota. House Sec. 1003(6). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(7). Middle Fork Grand River, Gentry County, Missouri. 
     House Sec. 1003(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1003(8). Platte River, Platte City, Missouri. House 
     Sec. 1003(8). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(9). Rush Creek, Parkville, Missouri. House 
     Sec. 1003(9). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(10). Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland County, New York. 
     House Sec. 1003(10). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1003(11). Keuka Lake, Hammondsport, New York. House 
     Sec. 1003(11). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(12). Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson River, New 
     Windsor, New York. House Sec. 1003(12). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(13). Owego Creek, Tioga County, New York. House 
     Sec. 1003(13). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(14). Howard Road Outfall, Shelby County, Tennessee. 
     House Sec. 1003(14). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1003(15). Mitch Farm Ditch and Lateral D, Shelby County, 
     Tennessee. House Sec. 1003(15). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(16). Wolf River Tributaries, Shelby County, Tennessee. 
     House Sec. 1003(16). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1003(17). Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas. House 
     Sec. 1003(17). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1003(18). Wells River, Newbury, Vermont. House 
     Sec. 1003(18). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.


                SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION

       1004(a)(1). Barrow Harbor, Alaska. Senate Sec. 1005(1). No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1004(a)(2). Coffman Cove, Alaska. House Sec. 5030. No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       1004(a)(3). Kotzebue Harbor, Alaska. House Sec. 5033. No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       1004(a)(4). Nome Harbor, Alaska. Senate Sec. 1005(2). No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1004(a)(5). Old Harbor, Alaska. Senate Sec. 1005(3). No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1004(a)(6). Little Rock Port, Arkansas. Senate 
     Sec. 1005(4). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1004(a)(7). Mississippi River Ship Channel, Louisiana. 
     House Sec. 1004(a)(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1004(a)(8). East Basin, Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, 
     Massachusetts. House Sec. 1004(a)(2), Senate 1005(5).--Same.
       1004(a)(9). Lynn Harbor, Lynn, Massachusetts. House 
     Sec. 1004(a)(3), Senate Sec. 1005(6).--Same.
       1004(a)(10). Merrimack River, Haverhill, Massachusetts. 
     House Sec. 1004(a)(4), Senate Sec. 1005(7).--Same.
       1004(a)(11). Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts. 
     House Sec. 1004(a)(5), Senate Sec. 1005(8).--Same.
       1004(a)(12). Woods Hole Great Harbor, Falmouth, 
     Massachusetts. House Sec. 1004(a)(6), Senate Sec. 1005(9).--
     Same.
       1004(a)(13). Au Sable River, Michigan. House 
     Sec. 1004(a)(7), Senate Sec. 1005(10).--Same.
       1004(a)(14). Clinton River, Michigan. Senate Sec. 1005(11). 
     No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1004(a)(15). Ontonagon River, Michigan. Senate 
     Sec. 1005(12). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1004(a)(16). Outer Channel and Inner Harbor, Menominee 
     Harbor, Michigan and Wisconsin. Senate Sec. 1005(16). No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1004(a)(17). Sebewaing River, Michigan. Senate 
     Sec. 1005(14). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1004(a)(18). Traverse City Harbor, Traverse City, Michigan. 
     House Sec. 1004(a)(8), Senate Sec. 1005(13).--Same.
       1004(a)(19). Tower Harbor, Tower Minnesota. House 
     Sec. 1004(a)(9), Senate Sec. 1005(15).--Same.
       1004(a)(20). Olcott Harbor, Olcott, New York. House 
     Sec. 1004(a)(10). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1004(a)(21). Milwaukee Harbor, Wisconsin. Senate 
     Sec. 1005(18). No comparable House section.--House recedes.


    SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
                              ENVIRONMENT

       1005(1). Ballona Creek, Los Angeles County, California. 
     House Sec. 1005(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1005(2). Ballona Lagoon Tide Gates, Marina Del Ray, 
     California. House Sec. 1005(2). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1005(3). Ft. George Inlet, Duval County, Florida. House 
     Sec. 1005(3). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1005(4). Rathbun Lake, Iowa. House Sec. 1005(4). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.

[[Page 21825]]

       1005(5). Smithville Lake, Missouri. House Sec. 1005(5). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1005(6). Delaware Bay, New Jersey and Delaware. House 
     Sec. 1005(6). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1005(7). Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pennsylvania. House 
     Sec. 1005(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.


      SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

       1006(a)(1). Cypress Creek, Montgomery, Alabama. House 
     Sec. 1006(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(2). Black Lake, Alaska. House Sec. 1006(2), Senate 
     Sec. 1006(1).--Same.
       1006(a)(3). Ben Lomond Dam, Santa Cruz, California. House 
     Sec. 1006(4). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(4). Dockweiler Bluffs, Los Angeles County, 
     California. House Sec. 1006(5). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(5). Salt River, California. House Sec. 1006(6). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(6). San Diego River, California. Senate 
     Sec. 1006(2). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1006(a)(7). Santa Rosa Creek, Santa Rosa, California. House 
     Sec. 1006(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(8). Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel and Lower San 
     Joaquin River, California. House Sec. 1006(8). No comparable 
     Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(9). Suisun Marsh, San Pablo Bay, California. Senate 
     Sec. 1006(3). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1006(a)(10). Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, 
     California. House Sec. 1006(9). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(11). Biscayne Bay, Florida. House Sec. 1006(10). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(12). Clam Bayou and Dinkins Bayou, Sanibel Island, 
     Florida. House Sec. 1006(11). No comparable Senate section.--
     Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(13). Mountain Park, Georgia. Senate 
     Sec. 2037(a)(2)(A). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.
       1006(a)(14). Chattahoochee Fall Line, Georgia and Alabama. 
     House Sec. 1006(12), Senate Sec. 1006(4).--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(15). Longwood Cove, Gainesville, Georgia. House 
     Sec. 1006(13). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(16). City Park, University Lakes, Louisiana. House 
     Sec. 1006(15). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(17). Lawrence Gateway, Massachusetts. Senate 
     Sec. 1006(5). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1006(a)(18). Milford Pond, Milford, Massachusetts. Senate 
     Sec. 1006(7). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1006(a)(19). Mill Pond, Littleton, Massachusetts. House 
     Sec. 1006(16), Senate Sec. 1006(6).--Same.
       1006(a)(20). Pine Tree Brook, Milton, Massachusetts. House 
     Sec. 1006(17), Senate Sec. 1006(8).--Same.
       1006(a)(21). Clinton River, Michigan. Senate Sec. 1006(9). 
     No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1006(a)(22). Kalamazoo River Watershed, Battle Creek, 
     Michigan. House Sec. 1006(18). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(23). Rush Lake, Minnesota. House Sec. 1006(19). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(24). South Fork of the Crow River, Hutchinson, 
     Minnesota. House Sec. 1006(20). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(25). St. Louis, Missouri. House Sec. 1006(21). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(26). Mobley Dam, Tongue River, Montana. No 
     comparable House or Senate section.
       1006(a)(27). S and H Dam, Tongue River, Montana. No 
     comparable House or Senate section.
       1006(a)(28). Vandalia Dam, Milk River, Montana. No 
     comparable House or Senate section.
       1006(a)(29). Truckee River, Reno, Nevada. House 
     Sec. 1006(22). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(30). Grover's Mill Pond, New Jersey. House 
     Sec. 1006(23). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(31). Caldwell County, North Carolina. Senate 
     Sec. 1006(10). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1006(a)(32). Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Senate 
     Sec. 1006(11). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1006(a)(33). Dugway Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio. House 
     Sec. 1006(24). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(34). Johnson Creek, Gresham, Oregon. House 
     Sec. 1006(25), Senate Sec. 1006(12).--Same.
       1006(a)(35). Beaver Creek, Beaver and Salem, Pennsylvania. 
     House Sec. 1006(26). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1006(a)(36). Cementon Dam, Lehigh River, Pennsylvania. 
     House Sec. 1006(27). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       1006(a)(37). Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, 
     Pennsylvania. House Sec. 5003(a)(5). Senate 
     Sec. 2037(a)(2)(E).--House recedes.
       1006(a)(38). Saucon Creek, Northampton County, 
     Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1006(28). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(39). Stillwater Lake Dam, Monroe County, 
     Pennsylvania. Senate Sec. 2037(a)(2)(F), House 
     Sec. 5003(a)(7).--House recedes.
       1006(a)(40). Blackstone River, Rhode Island. House 
     Sec. 1006(29), Senate Sec. 1006(13).--Same.
       1006(a)(41). Wilson Branch, Cheraw, South Carolina. House 
     Sec. 1006(30). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(42). White River, Bethel, Vermont. House 
     Sec. 1006(31). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1006(a)(43). College Lake, Lynchburg, Virginia. Senate 
     Sec. 1006(14). No comparable Senate section.--House recedes.


           SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION

       1007(1). Nelson Lagoon, Alaska. House Sec. 1007(1). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1007(2). Nicholas Canyon, Los Angeles, California. Senate 
     Sec. 4006. No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       1007(3). Sanibel Island, Florida. House Sec. 1007(2). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1007(4). Apra Harbor, Guam. House Sec. 1007(3). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1007(5). Piti, Cabras Island, Guam. House Sec. 1007(4). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       1007(6). Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New York Bay, 
     Brooklyn, New York. House Sec. 1007(5). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1007(7). Delaware River, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 
     Pennsylvania. House Sec. 1007(7). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       1007(8). Port Aransas, Texas. House Sec. 1007(8). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.


      SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL

       1008. Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, 
     New York. House Sec. 1008. No comparable Senate section.--
     Senate recedes.


   SEC. 1009. SMALL PROJECTS TO PREVENT OR MITIGATE DAMAGE CAUSED BY 
                          NAVIGATION PROJECTS

       1009(1). Tybee Island, Georgia. Senate Sec. 1007(1). House 
     Sec. 4032. House recedes.
       1009(2). Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana. Senate 
     Sec. 1007(2). House Sec. 5069. House recedes.


          SEC. 1010. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL

       1010. Republican River Basin, Nebraska. Senate Sec. 1008. 
     No comparable House section.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.

                      TITLE 2--GENERAL PROVISIONS


                  SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS

       House Sec. 2001, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 2002. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS

       House Sec. 2003, Senate Sec. 2017. Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       The Managers recognize the importance of efficient and 
     effective processing of permits by the Corps of Engineers for 
     activities affecting federally regulated waters, including 
     wetlands, in compliance with the Federal Water Pollution 
     Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et. seq.). Congress included a 
     provision in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
     (Pub. L. 106-541, Sec. 214) to expedite the permit processing 
     time for nonfederal public entities.
       The Managers also recognize the findings and 
     recommendations of the May 2007 report of the United States 
     Government Accountability Office (``GAO''), entitled ``Corps 
     of Engineers Needs to Ensure That Permit Decisions Made Using 
     Funds from Nonfederal Public Entities Are Transparent and 
     Impartial'' (GAO-07-478). In this report, GAO emphasized the 
     importance of transparency and impartiality in permit reviews 
     and decisionmaking, and ensuring that all of the Corps' 
     District offices follow internal Corps' Headquarters guidance 
     on maintaining impartial decisionmaking, including, at a 
     minimum, that all Corps District offices provide that permits 
     decisions under section 214 are reviewed at least by one 
     level above the decisionmaker, that all final permit 
     decisions are made available electronically, that the Corps 
     not eliminate any procedures or decisions that would 
     otherwise be required for the type of project under 
     consideration, and that the Corps comply with all applicable 
     laws and regulations. The GAO report also expressed concern 
     that certain Corps districts have allowed private companies 
     to submit permit applications under section 214, in 
     contravention to the intent of this authority.
       Although GAO was not able to conclude definitively whether 
     permitting processing times have decreased under the section 
     214 program, the report does recognize some benefits reported 
     by participating non-Federal public entities, including the 
     potential for reduced cost and time for permit processing for 
     those entities that have contributed funds to the program, 
     and improved communication between participating entities and 
     the Corps.
       The Managers intend to conduct additional oversight on the 
     implementation of this program before the authority for this 
     program expires in 2009.


       SEC. 2003. WRITTEN AGREEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

       House Sec. 2009, Senate Sec. 2001, 2023, and 2039.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     SEC. 2004. COMPILATION OF LAWS

       House Sec. 2011, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.

[[Page 21826]]




                  SEC. 2005. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL

       House Sec. 2012, Senate Sec. 3089.--Senate recedes.


               SEC. 2006. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS

       House Sec. 2015, Senate Sec. 2038.--Senate recedes.


                 SEC. 2007. USE OF OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS

       House Sec. 2018, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


   SEC. 2008. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT; COST SHARING

       House Sec. 2019, 2020, 2035. No comparable Senate 
     sections.--Senate recedes, with an amendment.


   SEC. 2009. EXPEDITED ACTIONS FOR EMERGENCY FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION

       House Sec. 2021, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


            SEC. 2010. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS

       House Sec. 2022, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                 SEC. 2011. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM

       House Sec. 2023, Senate Sec. 2027.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                    SEC. 2012. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING

       House Sec. 2024, Senate Sec. 2022.--Same.


                    SEC. 2013. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

       House Sec. 2025, Senate Sec. 2009.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                        SEC. 2014. LAKES PROGRAM

       House Sec. 2026, Senate Sec. 5001.--House and Senate with 
     comparable sections, combine list of House and Senate 
     projects.
       This section amends section 602(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 to add the following locations to the 
     Lakes Program: Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois; 
     McCarter Pond, Borough of Fairhaven, New Jersey; Rogers Pond, 
     Franklin Township, New Jersey; Greenwood Lake, New York and 
     New Jersey; Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina; Lake 
     Sakakawea, North Dakota; Lake Luxembourg, Pennsylvania; Lake 
     Fairlee, Vermont; and Lake Morley, Vermont.


                   SEC. 2015. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS

       House Sec. 2029, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                       SEC. 2016. TRAINING FUNDS

       House Sec. 2030, Senate Sec. 2003.--Same.


                SEC. 2017. ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCE DATA

       House Sec. 2031, Senate Sec. 2010.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                  SEC. 2018. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS

       House Sec. 2032, Senate Sec. 2014.--Senate recedes.


                       SEC. 2019. ABILITY TO PAY

       House Sec. 2033, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 2020. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY RESTORATION

       House Sec. 2006, Senate Sec. 2033, 2035, and 2037.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       The Managers recognize the importance of projects for the 
     restoration of salt-water estuaries and for the 
     rehabilitation and removal of dams in improving aquatic 
     ecosystems and the environment. The Managers recognize that 
     such projects are typically eligible under section 206 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
       This section amends section 206 to explicitly authorize 
     projects that improve elements and features of an estuary (as 
     defined in section 103 of the Estuaries and Clean Waters Act 
     of 2000 (33 U.S.S. 2902)) and projects for the removal of 
     dams, that otherwise meet the requirements of section 206.


            SEC. 2021. SMALL FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS

       House Sec. 2007, Senate Sec. 2040.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


         SEC. 2022. SMALL RIVER AND HARBOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

       Senate Sec. 2031, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


SEC. 2023. PROTECTION OF HIGHWAYS, BRIDGE APPROACHES, PUBLIC WORKS, AND 
                       NONPROFIT PUBLIC SERVICES

       Senate Sec. 2032, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


 SEC. 2024. MODIFICATION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 
                            THE ENVIRONMENT

       House Sec. 2008, Senate Sec. 2034.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


             SEC. 2025. REMEDIATION OF ABANDONED MINE SITES

       Senate Sec. 2036, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall give 
     priority to the Mt. Diablo Mercury Mine Clean-up project in 
     Contra Costa County, California.


                      SEC. 2026. LEASING AUTHORITY

       House Sec. 2034, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 Sec. 2027. FISCAL TRANSPARENCY REPORT

       Senate Sec. 2004, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


             SEC. 2028. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM

       House Sec. 2041, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


SEC. 2029. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON CRITERIA FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
                      OF HARBOR DREDGING PROJECTS

       House Sec. 2043, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


       SEC. 2030. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY

       Senate Sec. 2002, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


          SEC. 2028. WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES

       House Sec. 2036, Senate Sec. 2006.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


              SEC. 2032. WATER RESOURCE PRIORITIES REPORT

       Senate Sec. 2006(d), No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                          SEC. 2033. PLANNING

       Senate Sec. 2005, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                   SEC. 2034. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW

       Senate Sec. 2007, House Sec. 2037.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       Section 2034 provides that project studies shall be subject 
     to peer review by an independent panel of experts, as 
     provided in this section. The conference agreement is a 
     combination of independent peer review proposals passed by 
     the Senate and the House of Representatives. The managers 
     believe that the conference agreement improves upon both the 
     House and Senate proposals to create a strong, workable, and 
     independent process for review of project studies carried out 
     by the Corps of Engineers. For example, the conference 
     agreement authorizes the independent peer review to run 
     concurrent with the project study period, and requires that 
     the peer review panel remain beyond the release of the 
     independent peer review report to allow the expertise gained 
     during the review period to be utilized by the Corps up to 
     the release of the draft report of the Chief of Engineers.
       This section establishes two categories for independent 
     peer review--project studies for which independent peer 
     review is mandatory, and project studies for which such 
     review is discretionary. This section provides for mandatory 
     review of project studies that have an estimated total cost 
     of more than $45 million, project studies for which the 
     Governor of an affected state requests an independent peer 
     review, and project studies that the Chief of Engineers 
     determines are controversial. In determining whether a 
     project is controversial, the Chief of Engineers must 
     consider whether there is significant public dispute as to 
     the size, nature, or effects of the proposed project, and 
     whether there is significant public dispute as to the 
     economic or environmental costs or benefits of the proposed 
     project.
       Section 2034(a)(3)(B) provides for discretionary 
     independent peer review of project studies for which the head 
     of a Federal or state agency charged with reviewing the 
     project study determines that the proposed project is likely 
     to have a significant adverse impact on environmental, 
     cultural, or other natural resources under the jurisdiction 
     of the agency after implementation of the proposed mitigation 
     plans. This section provides that the Chief of Engineers must 
     reach a decision whether to conduct an independent peer 
     review of such project studies within 21 days of a receipt of 
     a request by the head of the Federal or state agency. In the 
     event that the Chief of Engineers decides not to conduct a 
     discretionary independent peer review, the head of the 
     Federal or state agency that requested the review may appeal 
     this decision to the Chairman of the Council on Environmental 
     Quality (``CEQ''). The Chairman of CEQ must reach a decision 
     on whether an independent peer review must be conducted for 
     the project study within 30 days of receipt of an appeal. In 
     the event that the Chief of Engineers decides not to conduct 
     an independent peer review, the Chief of Engineers must make 
     the reasons for not conducting the review publicly available, 
     including on the Internet.
       Section 2034 permits the Chief of Engineers to exclude a 
     very limited number of project studies from independent peer 
     review. The managers expect that project studies that could 
     be excluded from independent peer review are so limited in 
     scope or impact, that they would not significantly benefit 
     from an independent peer review.
       Sections 2034(a)(5)(A) and (B) establish criteria for the 
     Chief of Engineers to exclude a project study that is subject 
     to independent peer review because its estimated total costs 
     exceed $45 million. The managers expect that these criteria 
     allow the Chief of Engineers to exclude from independent peer 
     review only those project studies for which there is no 
     controversy, a lack of significant impact to cultural, 
     historical, or tribal resources, a lack of substantial 
     adverse impacts to fish and wildlife species or habitat, and 
     a lack of an impact on endangered or threatened species under 
     the Endangered Species Act, or involve projects that, in 
     essence, replace existing components of ongoing projects 
     within the same footprint as the original project, or have 
     minimal risk to life or public safety.
       Project studies subject to independent peer review based on 
     the request of the Governor of an affected State may not be 
     excluded from review.
       Section 2034(a)(5)(C) authorizes the Chief of Engineers to 
     exclude the small project studies developed under certain of 
     the Corps of Engineers continuing authorities programs; 
     however, such project studies could be subject to independent 
     peer review under the

[[Page 21827]]

     factors established under section 2034(a)(3)(A).
       Sections 2034(a)(2) and 2034(d) establish the duties of the 
     independent peer review panel and the scope of review for a 
     project study. The managers have defined the scope of review 
     broadly to allow the independent review panel to examine all 
     of the economic and environmental assumptions and 
     projections, project evaluation data, economic analyses, 
     environmental analyses, engineering analyses, formulation of 
     alternative plans, methods for integrating risk and 
     uncertainty, models used in evaluation of economic or 
     environmental impacts of proposed projects, and any 
     biological opinions of the project study. The managers expect 
     the independent peer review panel to review those components 
     of a project study for which the panel believes there is a 
     reason for review. The managers do not expect the independent 
     peer review panel to review components of the project study 
     where the panel determines there is no controversy, 
     disagreement, or concern.
       Sections 2034(b) and 2034(e)(1)(A) establish the timing of 
     the independent peer review. The managers expect that, in all 
     cases, the independent peer review will occur during the 
     period beginning on the date of the signing of the 
     feasibility cost-sharing agreement, and will be conducted 
     concurrent with the development of the project study by the 
     Corps of Engineers. The managers believe that having the 
     independent peer review carried out concurrently with the 
     development of the project study will allow the independent 
     peer review panel to receive relevant information from the 
     Corps, on a timely basis, and allow the independent peer 
     review panel to provide ongoing input into the development of 
     the project study. The managers expect that this process will 
     provide the independent peer review panel with sufficient 
     information to conduct its review, as well as allow the peer 
     review panel to recommend mid-course corrections to the 
     ongoing project study, and avoid the potential for 
     significant issues or delay to arise at the end of the 
     project study period. The managers recognize that the 
     recommendations of the independent peer review panel are 
     advisory; however, the managers expect the Corps to give full 
     consideration to the findings of the independent peer review 
     panel.
       Section 2034(e)(1)(A) provides that the independent peer 
     review panel conclude its peer review, and submit a report to 
     the Chief of Engineers, not more than 60 days after the close 
     of the public comment period for the draft project study. The 
     Chief of Engineers may extend the period for the peer review 
     panel to conclude its peer review if the Chief of Engineers 
     determines that additional time is necessary. The managers 
     have included language to terminate the peer review panel on 
     the date of the initiation of the State and agency review, 
     which is conterminous with the release of the draft Report of 
     the Chief of Engineers for the project, and which is after 
     the issuance of the peer review report. The managers 
     recognize that the Corps of Engineers intends to allow a 
     member or members of the peer review panel to participate on 
     the Civil Works Review Board, which requires District 
     Commanders to present their final reports and recommendations 
     for review. The managers have included language to keep the 
     independent peer review impaneled beyond the issuance of the 
     peer review report to allow a member of the peer review panel 
     to participate on the Civil Works Review Board, and to be 
     available as experts, if needed, for additional consultation 
     with the Corps of Engineers on the project study.


                   SEC. 2035. SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW

       Senate Sec. 2007(d), No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


    SEC. 2036. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE AND WETLANDS LOSSES

       House Sec. 2013 and 2014, Senate Sec. 2008.--House recedes, 
     with an amendment.
       Section 2036 amends section 906(d) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 with more explicit mitigation 
     requirements and to specify the elements that must be 
     identified in a mitigation plan required under that section.
       This section requires the Secretary to mitigate losses to 
     flood damage reduction capabilities and losses to fish and 
     wildlife of the project area. The specific mitigation plan 
     must include a description of the physical action to be 
     undertaken. The plan also must include a description of the 
     lands or interests in lands to be acquired for mitigation, 
     and the basis for a determination that such lands are 
     available. This description is not intended to be a 
     description of the specific property interests, but the plan 
     must describe how the mitigation will be implemented.
       The managers expect the mitigation plan to identify the 
     quantity and type of lands needed, and include a 
     determination that lands of such quantity and type are 
     available for acquisition. The plan also must include the 
     type, amount, and characteristics of the habitat to be 
     restored. The plan must include success criteria based on 
     replacement of lost functions and values of the habitat, 
     including hydrologic and vegetative characteristics. Finally, 
     if monitoring is necessary to determine success of the 
     mitigation, the plan must include a plan for monitoring and 
     to the extent practicable, identification of the entities 
     responsible for monitoring. As monitoring is part of 
     operation and maintenance of a project, in most cases the 
     entity responsible for any monitoring will be the non-Federal 
     sponsor. If such person is not identifiable at the time the 
     mitigation plan is prepared under this section, such person 
     must be identified in the partnership agreement entered into 
     with the non-Federal interest.
       The managers support more specificity in Corps reporting 
     documents concerning expected mitigation efforts. Such 
     increased specificity will better inform the Congress, the 
     non-Federal sponsor, and the public as to planned mitigation 
     efforts and the likely success of these efforts. This section 
     also directs the Secretary to submit to Congress a report on 
     the status of mitigation concurrent with the submission of 
     reports on the status of project construction, as part of the 
     President's budget submission.
       Section 2036(c) directs the Secretary, when carrying out 
     water resources projects, to first consider the use of a 
     mitigation bank if the bank has sufficient and appropriate 
     (including ecologically appropriate) credit to offset the 
     impact, and the mitigation bank meets certain criteria. To 
     the maximum extent practicable, the service area of the 
     mitigation bank shall be in the same watershed as the project 
     activity for which mitigation is required.
       Nothing in this section affects the responsibility of the 
     Corps of Engineers to apply the regulatory guidelines 
     developed under section 404(b)(1) of the Federal Water 
     Pollution Control Act (40 CFR Part 230) related to mitigation 
     sequencing.


                SEC. 2037. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT

       House Sec. 2016, Senate Sec. 2012.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       This section amends section 204 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), and includes a new 
     subsection (f) that directs the Secretary to give priority to 
     regional sediment management projects in the following 
     locations: Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas; Fletcher 
     Cove, California; Egmont Key, Florida; Calcasieu Ship 
     Channel, Louisiana; Delaware River Estuary, New Jersey and 
     Pennsylvania; Fire Island Inlet, Suffolk County, New York; 
     Smith Point Park Pavilion and the TWA Flight 800 Memorial, 
     Brookhaven, New York; Morehead City, North Carolina; Toledo 
     Harbor, Lucas County, Ohio; Galveston Bay, Texas; and Benson 
     Beach, Washington.


   SEC. 2038. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

       House Sec. 2005 and 2004, Senate Sec. 2013.--House recedes, 
     with an amendment.


              SEC. 2039. MONITORING ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

       Senate Sec. 2015, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


        SEC. 2040. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS

       Senate Sec. 2018, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 2041. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

       Senate Sec. 2024, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 2042. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

       Senate Sec. 2025, No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


      SEC. 2043. STUDIES AND REPORTS FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

       House Sec. 2038, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  SEC. 2044. COORDINATION AND SCHEDULING OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL 
                                ACTIONS

       House Sec. 2027, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                    SEC. 2045. PROJECT STREAMLINING

       House Sec. 2028, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                   SEC. 2046. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION

       Senate Sec. 2028, House Sec. 3123(f).--House recedes, with 
     an amendment.


                   SEC. 2047. FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGES

       House Sec. 2042, Senate Sec. 2020.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS


           SEC. 3001. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA

       Senate Sec. 3003. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                     SEC. 3002. COOK INLET, ALASKA

       House Sec. 3001. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 3003. KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA

       House Sec. 3002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 3004. SEWARD HARBOR, ALASKA

       Senate Sec. 4001. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                        SEC. 3005. SITKA, ALASKA

       House Sec. 3003, Senate Sec. 3002.--Same.


                      SEC. 3006. TATITLEK, ALASKA

       House Sec. 3004. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               SEC. 3007. RIO DE FLAG, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA

       House Sec. 3005, Senate Sec. 3005.--Same.


 SEC. 3008. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, ARIZONA

       Senate Sec. 3004. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.

[[Page 21828]]




                SEC. 3009. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, ARIZONA

       Senate Sec. 3006. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                  SEC. 3010. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARKANSAS

       House Sec. 3006. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       SEC. 3011. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI

       Senate Sec. 3010. House Sec. 5043.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                 SEC. 3012. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, ARKANSAS

       House Sec. 3007. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


   SEC. 3013. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA

       Senate Sec. 3009. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                SEC. 3014. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 3013. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


            SEC. 3015. CALFED STABILITY PROGRAM, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 3014. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                  SEC. 3016. COMPTON CREEK, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3009. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


         SEC. 3017. GRAYSON CREEK/MURDERER'S CREEK, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3010, Senate Sec. 2016(1).--Senate recedes.


                SEC. 3018. HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3011, Senate Sec. 3015.--Senate recedes.


  SEC. 3019. JOHN F. BALDWIN SHIP CHANNEL AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNEL, 
                               CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3012. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       The managers recommend that the Secretary and the Chief of 
     Engineers expedite the completion of the ongoing General 
     Reevaluation Report for the San Francisco Bay to Stockton 
     project.


                  SEC. 3020. KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3013. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


        SEC. 3021. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3014, Senate Sec. 3017.--Senate recedes.


                  SEC. 3022. LLAGAS CREEK, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3015, Senate Sec. 3018.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                  SEC. 3023. MAGPIE CREEK, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3016, Senate Sec. 3019.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


        SEC. 3024. PACIFIC FLYWAY CENTER, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3017. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


            SEC. 3025. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 3020. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 3026. PINOLE CREEK, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3018. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 3027. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3019. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


         SEC. 3028. REDWOOD CITY NAVIGATION CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 3029. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.
       The managers recognize the importance of annual operation 
     and maintenance of navigation channels and note that the work 
     addressed in this section can be addressed under existing 
     statutory authorities. The managers do not intend to address 
     the operation and maintenance of every navigation project 
     through the enactment of additional statutory language, but 
     expect the Corps to address the maintenance dredging needs of 
     authorized projects under existing statutory authorities.


  SEC. 3029. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3008 and 3020, Senate Sec. 3023.--House recedes, 
     with an amendment.


       SEC. 3030. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3019. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


        SEC. 3031. SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 3024. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


             SEC. 3032. SALTON SEA RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 3026. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


            SEC. 3033. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CALIFORNIA

       No comparable Senate or House section.


   SEC. 3034. SANTA BARBARA STREAMS, LOWER MISSION CREEK, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 3027. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                SEC. 3035. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3022. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 3036. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3023, Senate Sec. 2016(2).--Senate recedes, with 
     an amendment.


              SEC. 3037. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3025, Senate Sec. 3028.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


              SEC. 3038. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3025, Senate Sec. 2016(3).--Senate recedes.


         SEC. 3039. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3026. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


        SEC. 3040. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE II, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3027, Senate Sec. 2016(5).--Senate recedes.


            SEC. 3041. YUBA RIVER BASIN PROJECT, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 3028, Senate Sec. 3029.--Senate recedes.


             SEC. 3042. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, COLORADO

       House Sec. 3029. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  SEC. 3043. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, 
                         DELAWARE AND MARYLAND

       House Sec. 3030. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 3044. ST. GEORGE'S BRIDGE, DELAWARE

       Senate Sec. 3033. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 3045. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 3031, Senate Sec. 3035.--Senate recedes.


         SEC. 3046. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 3032. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 3047. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 3033. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


           SEC. 3048. GASPARILLA AND ESTERO ISLANDS, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 3034. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              SEC. 3049. LIDO KEY BEACH, SARASOTA, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 3036, Senate Sec. 3038.--Senate recedes.


                   SEC. 3050. PEANUT ISLAND, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 3038. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 3051. PORT SUTTON, FLORIDA

       Senate Sec. 3039. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


           SEC. 3052. TAMPA HARBOR-BIG BEND CHANNEL, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 3039. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 3053. TAMPA HARBOR CUT B, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 3040, Senate Sec. 3040.--Senate recedes.


                   SEC. 3054. ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA

       House Sec. 3041, Senate Sec. 3041.--House recedes.


             SEC. 3055. LATHAM RIVER, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA

       House Sec. 3042. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 3056. DWORSHAK RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS, IDAHO

       Senate Sec. 3042, House Sec. 3043.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


              SEC. 3057. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO

       Senate Sec. 3043. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


   SEC. 3058. BEARDSTOWN COMMUNITY BOAT HARBOR, BEARDSTOWN, ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 3044. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 3059. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 3045, Senate Sec. 3045.--Same.


                   SEC. 3060. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 3046, Senate Sec. 3046.--Same.


SEC. 3061. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS PROJECT, 
                                ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 3047, Senate Sec. 5015.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                      SEC. 3062. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 3048. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                      SEC. 3063. LASALLE, ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 3049. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 3064. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 3050, Senate Sec. 3050.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                     SEC. 3065. CEDAR LAKE, INDIANA

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                    SEC. 3066. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA

       House Sec. 3052. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 3067. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA

       House Sec. 3053. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront

[[Page 21829]]

     and riverfront development projects, the managers do not 
     intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


            SEC. 3068. DES MOINES RIVER AND GREENBELT, IOWA

       House Sec. 3054. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


                      SEC. 3069. PERRY CREEK, IOWA

       Senate Sec. 3145. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                     SEC. 3070. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA

       House Sec. 3055, Senate Sec. 3146.--Same.


            SEC. 3071. HICKMAN BLUFF STABILIZATION, KENTUCKY

       Senate Sec. 3054. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


         SEC. 3072. MCALPINE LOCK AND DAM, KENTUCKY AND INDIANA

       Senate Sec. 3055. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 3073. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY

       House Sec. 3056. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  SEC. 3074. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON ROUGE 
                            PARISH WATERSHED

       House Sec. 3057, Senate Sec. 3059.--Senate recedes.


        SEC. 3075. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 3059 and 3062, Senate Sec. 3056.--House recedes, 
     with an amendment.


SEC. 3076. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, REGIONAL VISITOR CENTER, 
                               LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 3058, Senate Sec. 3057.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


   SEC. 3077. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, 
                               LOUISIANA

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                 SEC. 3078. BAYOU PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 3056. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             SEC. 3079. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LOUISIANA

       Senate Sec. 3058. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


     SEC. 3080. RED RIVER (J. BENNETT JOHNSTON) WATERWAY, LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 3061, Senate Sec. 3061.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


             SEC. 3081. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 3063. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


    SEC. 3082. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET RELOCATION ASSISTANCE, 
                               LOUISIANA

       Senate Sec. 3060. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an mendment.


                      SEC. 3083. VIOLET, LOUISIANA

       Senate Sec. 3076. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


 SEC. 3084. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), 
                               LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 3065. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 3085. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE

       House Sec. 3066, Senate Sec. 3062.--Senate recedes.


                    SEC. 3086. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND

       Senate Sec. 3069. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 3087. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND

       Senate Sec. 1001(22). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


         SEC. 3088. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN

       House Sec. 3067. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


        SEC. 3089. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN

       House Sec. 3067, Senate Sec. 3074.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                 SEC. 3090. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN

       House Sec. 3065. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 3091. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN

       House Sec. 3070, No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       The Managers recognize the importance of constructing a 
     second lock at Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, to enhance 
     overall national security by avoiding any potential 
     disruption to Great Lakes, national, and international 
     shipping that would occur in the event of a shutdown or 
     terrorist attack at the existing lock. The Secretary is 
     directed to carry out the project, as expeditiously as 
     practicable, without regard to normal policy considerations.


                       SEC. 3092. ADA, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3071. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


           SEC. 3093. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3072, Senate Sec. 3075.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                   SEC. 3094. GRAND MARAIS, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3073. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               SEC. 3095. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3074. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 3096. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3073. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                SEC. 3097. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3076. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 3098. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3077. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 3099. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 3100. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3079. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 3101. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 3078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


          SEC. 3102. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

       House Sec. 3078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 3103. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

       Senate Sec. 3147. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


               SEC. 3104. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI

       House Sec. 3082. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


              SEC. 3105. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI

       House Sec. 3083. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 3106. L-15 LEVEE, MISSOURI

       House Sec. 3084, Senate Sec. 3078.--Same.


               SEC. 3107. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI

       House Sec. 3085. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 3108. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI

       House Sec. 3086. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             SEC. 3109. LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT, MONTANA

       Senate Sec. 3080. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


 SEC. 3110. YELLOWSTONE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MONTANA AND NORTH DAKOTA

       Senate Sec. 3081. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


              SEC. 3111. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA

       House Sec. 3087. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


            SEC. 3112. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA

       House Sec. 3088. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 3113. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA

       House Sec. 3089, Senate Sec. 3082.--Same.


         sec. 3114. lower truckee river, mccarran ranch, nevada

       Senate Sec. 3083. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


     sec. 3115. lower cape may meadows, cape may point, new jersey

       House Sec. 3090. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


      sec. 3116. passaic river basin flood management, new jersey

       House Sec. 3091. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             sec. 3117. cooperative agreements, new mexico

       Senate Sec. 3084. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


          sec. 3118. middle rio grande restoration, new mexico

       Senate Sec. 3085. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                  sec. 3119. buffalo harbor, new york.

       House Sec. 3092. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


     sec. 3120. long island sound oyster restoration, new york and 
                              connecticut

       Senate Sec. 3086. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.
       The Managers recognize that oyster restoration activities 
     are consistent with the

[[Page 21830]]

      Corps environmental protection and restoration mission, and 
     are appropriately cost shared at a non-Federal cost of 35 
     percent, consistent with section 103 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213). This section does 
     not create a new cost share for oyster restoration 
     activities.


 sec. 3121. mamaroneck and sheldrake rivers watershed management, new 
                                  york

       Senate Sec. 3087. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


               sec. 3122. orchard beach, bronx, new york

       House Sec. 3093, Senate Sec. 3088.--Senate recedes.


  sec. 3123. port of new york and new jersey, new york and new jersey

       House Sec. 3094. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 sec. 3124. new york state canal system

       House Sec. 3095, Senate Sec. 3090.--Same.


    sec. 3125. susquehanna river and upper delaware river watershed 
                          management, new york

       Senate Sec. 3091. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


          sec. 3126. missouri river restoration, north dakota

       Senate Sec. 3092. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   sec. 3127. wahpeton, north dakota

       No comparable Senate or House section.


                            sec. 3128. ohio

       Senate Sec. 3093. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


             sec. 3129. lower girard lake dam, girard, ohio

       House Sec. 3096, Senate Sec. 3094.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                    sec. 3130. mahoning river, ohio

       House Sec. 3074. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   sec. 3131. arcadia lake, oklahoma

       Senate Sec. 3096. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


              sec. 3132. arkansas river corridor, oklahoma

       Senate Sec. 3012. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                   sec. 3133. lake eufaula, oklahoma

       Senate Sec. 3097. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


       sec. 3134. oklahoma lakes demonstration program, oklahoma

       Senate Sec. 3099. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   sec. 3135. ottawa county, oklahoma

       Senate Sec. 3100. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       Section 3135 provides general authorization to complete the 
     current buyout of residences and businesses in the 
     communities of Picher, Cardin, and Hockerville, Oklahoma for 
     those applicants that wish to participate in the program 
     being administered by the State of Oklahoma. The funds 
     authorized in this section may be appropriated through any 
     Act of appropriation.
       Section 3135 directs the Administrator of the Environmental 
     Protection Agency to consider a remedial action for the Tar 
     Creek, Oklahoma, National Priorities List site that includes 
     permanent relocation of residents consistent with the program 
     and costs of the program being administered by the State of 
     Oklahoma. The Administrator should make appropriate use of 
     the expertise and experience of the State of Oklahoma Lead-
     Impacted Communities Relocation Assistance Trust in 
     developing such a remedy.
       Section 3135 also provides that the inclusion of subsidence 
     remedies, such as relocation, as part of the remedial action 
     does not preempt or in any way delay or interfere with the 
     right of any sovereign entity, including any state or tribal 
     government, to utilize state laws to seek additional or other 
     remedies, such as abatement, for the land subsidence and 
     subsidence risks. This section does not supersede state or 
     tribal authority to seek remedies for land subsidence.


       sec. 3136. red river chloride control, oklahoma and texas

       Senate Sec. 3101. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   sec. 3137. waurika lake, oklahoma

       Senate Sec. 3102. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


  sec. 3138. upper willamette river watershed ecosystem restoration, 
                                 oregon

       Senate Sec. 3104. House Sec. 5103.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


   sec. 3139. delaware river, pennsylvania, new jersey, and delaware

       House Sec. 3098. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 sec. 3140. raystown lake, pennsylvania

       House Sec. 3099. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


sec. 3141. sheraden park stream and chartiers creek, allegheny county, 
                              pennsylvania

       House Sec. 3100. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


         sec. 3142. solomon's creek, wilkes-barre, pennsylvania

       House Sec. 3101. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 sec. 3143. south central pennsylvania

       House Sec. 3102. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                sec. 3144. wyoming valley, pennsylvania

       House Sec. 3103. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               sec. 3145. narragansett bay, rhode island

       Senate Sec. 3106. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


          sec. 3146. missouri river restoration, south dakota

       Senate Sec. 3108. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                     sec. 3147. cedar bayou, texas

       House Sec. 3104, Senate Sec. 3113.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                   sec. 3148. freeport harbor, texas.

       House Sec. 3105, Senate Sec. 3116.--House recedes.


                      sec. 3149. lake kemp, texas

       House Sec. 3106. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                sec. 3150. lower rio grande basin, texas

       House Sec. 3107. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


        sec. 3151. north padre island, corpus christi bay, texas

       House Sec. 3108. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    sec. 3152. pat mayse lake, texas

       House Sec. 3109. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       The managers recognize the need to review Federal policy 
     concerning water supply at Corps of Engineers reservoirs, and 
     to determine whether changes are warranted. At many existing 
     Corps of Engineers reservoirs, there is the possibility of 
     expanding the storage space that is dedicated to municipal 
     and industrial water supply (drinking water) as an 
     alternative to alleviate local water supply shortages. This 
     is particularly true throughout the Southwest and Southeast. 
     The current policy of the Corps of Engineers is to maximize 
     the return to the Treasury for the right to utilize storage 
     at these existing reservoirs. This often makes the cost of 
     storage too high for many communities.
       The managers have included section 3152 in the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2007 to address this issue at 
     Pat Mayse Lake, Texas; however, the managers do not expect to 
     address additional water supply agreements on a case-by-case 
     basis in future water resources bills, but rather to review 
     the overall Federal policy concerning the operation of Corps 
     of Engineers facilities.


                     sec. 3153. proctor lake, texas

       House Sec. 3110. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           sec. 3154. san antonio channel, san antonio, texas

       House Sec. 3111. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           sec. 3155. connecticut river restoration, vermont

       Senate Sec. 3118. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                  sec. 3156. dam remediation, vermont

       Senate Sec. 3118. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.
       This provision adds the following dams to section 543 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 2000; Camp Wapanacki, 
     Hardwick; Star Lake Dam, Mt. Holly; Curtis Pond, Calais; 
     Weathersfield Reservoir, Springfield; Burr Pond, Sudbury; 
     Maidstone Lake, Guildhall; Upper and Lower Hurricane Dam; 
     Lake Fairlee; West Charleston Dam; White River, Sharon.


 sec. 3157. lake champlain eurasian milfoil, water chestnut, and other 
                    nonnative plant control, vermont

       Senate Sec. 3120. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


 sec. 3158. upper connecticut river basin wetland restoration, vermont 
                           and new hampshire

       Senate Sec. 3121. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


sec. 3159. upper connecticut river basin ecosystem restoration, vermont 
                           and new hampshire

       Senate Sec. 3122. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.

[[Page 21831]]




       sec. 3160. lake champlain watershed, vermont and new york

       Senate Sec. 3123. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


         sec. 3161. sandbridge beach, virginia beach, virginia

       Senate Sec. 3148. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


              sec. 3162. tangier island seawall, virginia

       House Sec. 3112, Senate Sec. 3126.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                 sec. 3163. duwanish/green, washington

       House Sec. 3113. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


   sec. 3164. mcnary lock and dam, mcnary national wildlife refuge, 
                          washington and idaho

       Senate Sec. 3128. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


          sec. 3165. snake river project, washington and idaho

       Senate Sec. 3130. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


         sec. 3166. yakima river, port of sunnyside, washington

       House Sec. 3114. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       SEC. 3167. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 3115. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


            SEC. 3168. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 3116. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 3169. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 3117. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 3170. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA

       Senate Sec. 3132. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


               SEC. 3171. MCDOWELL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

       Senate Sec. 3133. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 3172. PARKERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 3118. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


           SEC. 3173. GREEN BAY HARBOR, GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN

       Senate Sec. 3134. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 3174. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN

       House Sec. 3119. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 3175. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS

       House Sec. 3120, Senate Sec. 3137.--Senate recedes.


              SEC. 3176. UPPER BASIN OF THE MISSOURI RIVER

       Senate Sec. 3140. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


  SEC. 3177. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
                                PROGRAM

       Senate Sec. 3139. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


   SEC. 3178. UPPER OHIO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES NAVIGATION SYSTEM NEW 
                        TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM

       Senate Sec. 3144. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


           SEC. 3179. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS

       (1) Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California. House 
     Sec. 3121(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       (2) Agana River, Guam. House Sec. 3121(2). No comparable 
     Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       (3) Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland and Virginia. 
     House Sec. 3121(3), Senate Sec. 3067. Senate recedes.
       (4) Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts. House Sec. 3121(4), 
     Senate Sec. 3071.--Senate recedes.
       (5) Ecorse Creek, Wayne County, Michigan. Senate Sec. 3073, 
     No comparable House section.--House recedes.


                  SEC. 3180. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS

       (1) Menominee Harbor and River, Michigan and Wisconsin. 
     House Sec. 3122(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       (2) Hearding Island Inlet, Duluth Harbor, Minnesota. House 
     Sec. 3122(3). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       (3) Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin. House Sec. 3122(2), Senate 
     Sec. 3135.--Senate recedes.


                  SEC. 3181. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS

       (a)(1) Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut. House 
     Sec. 3123(a)(1), Senate Sec. 6003.--Senate recedes.
       (a)(2) Mystic River, Connecticut. House Sec. 3123(a)(2). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       (a)(3) Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut. Senate Sec. 3031. No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       (a)(4) Rockland Harbor, Maine. House Sec. 3123(a)(4), 
     Senate Sec. 3036.--House recedes.
       (a)(5) Rockport Harbor, Maine. Senate Sec. 3064. No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       (a)(6) Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts. House 
     Sec. 3123(a)(5), Senate Sec. 6027.--Senate recedes.
       (a)(7) Island End River, Massachusetts. House 
     Sec. 3123(a)(5), Senate Sec. 6028.--Senate recedes.
        (a)(8) City Waterway, Tacoma, Washington. House 
     Sec. 3123(a)(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
        (a)(9) Aunt Lydia's Cove, Massachusetts. House 
     Sec. 3123(a)(8), Senate Sec. 3070.--Senate recedes.
        (a)(10) Whatcom Creek Waterway, Bellingham, Washington. 
     Senate Sec. 3131. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.
        (a)(11) Oconto Harbor, Wisconsin. Senate Sec. 3136. No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       (b) Anchorage Area, New London Harbor, Connecticut. Senate 
     Sec. 3031, House Sec. 3142(a)(3).--House recedes.
       (c) Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut. House 
     Sec. 3123(b). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       (d) Saco River, Maine. House Sec. 3123(c), Senate 
     Sec. 3065.--Same.
       (e) Union River, Maine. House Sec. 3123(d), Senate 
     Sec. 3066.--Senate recedes.
       (f) Mystic River, Massachusetts. House Sec. 3123(e), Senate 
     Sec. 6029.--Senate recedes.
       (g) Rivercenter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. No comparable 
     House or Senate section.
       (h) Additional Deauthorizations. Senate Sec. Sec. 6002, 
     6004, 6005, 6007, 6008, 6009, 6011, 6013, 6014, 6015, 6016, 
     6017, 6018, 6019, 6022, 6023, 6026, 6033, 6034, 6036, 6037, 
     6042, 6045, 6046, 6048, 6049, 6050, 6051, 6052, 6053, and 
     6055. No comparable House sections.--House recedes.


                      SEC. 3182. LAND CONVEYANCES

       (a) St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri. House 
     Sec. 3124(a), Senate Sec. 3011.--Senate recedes.
       (b) Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, California. Senate 
     Sec. 5006. No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       (c) Milford, Kansas. House Sec. 3124(b), Senate 
     Sec. 3052.--Senate recedes.
       (d) Strawn Cemetery, John Redmond Lake, Kansas. Senate 
     Sec. 3051. No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       (e) Pike County, Missouri. House Sec. 3124(c), Senate 
     Sec. 3077.--House recedes.
       (f) Union Lake, Missouri. Senate Sec. 3079, No comparable 
     House section.--House recedes.
       (g) Boardman, Oregon. House Sec. 3124(d). No comparable 
     Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       (h) Lookout Point Project, Lowell, Oregon. House 
     Sec. 3124(e), Senate Sec. 3103. Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       (i) Richard B. Russell Lake, South Carolina. House 
     Sec. 3124(g), Senate Sec. 3107.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       (j) Denison, Texas. House Sec. 3124(h), Senate Sec. 3114.--
     House recedes, with an amendment.
       (k) Generally Applicable Provisions. House Sec. 3124(i). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.


      SEC. 3183. EXTINGUISHMENT OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AND USE 
                              RESTRICTIONS

       (a) Idaho. House Sec. 3125(a), Senate Sec. 3044.--House 
     recedes.
       (b) Lake Texoma, Oklahoma. House Sec. 3125(b), Senate 
     Sec. 3098. House recedes, with an amendment.
       (c) Lowell, Oregon. House Sec. 3124(f). No comparable 
     Senate provision.--Senate recedes.
       (d) Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee. 
     House Sec. 3125(c), Senate Sec. 3111.--House recedes.
       (e) Lower Granite Pool, Washington. Senate Sec. 3128. No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       (f) Port of Pasco, Washington. House Sec. 3125(d). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES


            SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM

       House Sec. 4001. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 4002. LAKE ERIE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES

       House Sec. 4002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 4003. SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES DROUGHT STUDY

       House Sec. 4003. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                       SEC. 4004. DELAWARE RIVER

       House Sec. 4004. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                      SEC. 4005. EURASIAN MILFOIL

       Senate Sec. 4031. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.

[[Page 21832]]




                     SEC. 4006. FIRE ISLAND, ALASKA

       House Sec. 5031. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                SEC. 4007. KNIK ARM, COOK INLET, ALASKA

       House Sec. 4005. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4008. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, ALASKA

       House Sec. 4006. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              SEC. 4009. NOME HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS, ALASKA

       Senate Sec. 4002. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 4010. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA

       House Sec. 4007. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 4011. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA

       House Sec. 4008. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                       SEC. 4012. VALDEZ, ALASKA

       House Sec. 5037. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                SEC. 4013. GILA BEND, MARICOPA, ARIZONA

       House Sec. 4009. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4014. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS

       House Sec. 4010. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4015. ALISO CREEK, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4011. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


        SEC. 4016. FRESNO, KINGS, AND KERN COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4013. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


    SEC. 4017. FRUITVALE AVENUE RAILROAD BRIDGE, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 4004. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


     SEC. 4018. LOS ANGELES RIVER REVITALIZATION STUDY, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4014, Senate Sec. 4005.--Senate recedes.


               SEC. 4019. LYTLE CREEK, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4015. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       SEC. 4020. MOKELUMNE RIVER, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4016. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                      SEC. 4021. ORICK, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4018. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 4022. SHORELINE STUDY, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 4007. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


           SEC. 4023. RIALTO, FONTANA, AND COLTON, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4019. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 4024. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4020. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 4025. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4021. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 SEC. 4026. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4022, Senate Sec. 4009.--Senate recedes.


        SEC. 4027. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4023, Senate Sec. 4010.--House recedes.


                SEC. 4028. TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4024. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                  SEC. 4029. YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 4025. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                  SEC. 4030. SELENIUM STUDY, COLORADO

       Senate Sec. 4013. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


     SEC. 4031. DELAWARE AND CHRISTINA RIVERS AND SHELLPOT CREEK, 
                          WILMINGTON, DELAWARE

       House Sec. 4027. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  SEC. 4032. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS AND TRIBUTARIES AND ATLANTIC COAST, 
                                DELAWARE

       Senate Sec. 4014. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


               SEC. 4033. COLLIER COUNTY BEACHES, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 4028. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               SEC. 4034. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 4029. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


   SEC. 4035. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL MAJOR REHABILITATION 
                            REPORT, FLORIDA

       Senate Sec. 4015. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


              SEC. 4036. VANDERBILT BEACH LAGOON, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 4030. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 4037. MERIWETHER COUNTY, GEORGIA

       House Sec. 4031. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     SEC. 4038. BOISE RIVER, IDAHO

       House Sec. 4033, Senate Sec. 4016.--Senate recedes.


           SEC. 4039. BALLARD'S ISLAND SIDE CHANNEL, ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 4034. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                      SEC. 4040. CHICAGO, ILLINIOS

       Senate Sec. 3046. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                       SEC. 4041. SALEM, INDIANA

       House Sec. 4035. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4042. BUCKHORN LAKE, KENTUCKY

       House Sec. 4036. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 4043. DEWEY LAKE, KENTUCKY

       House Sec. 4037. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 4044. LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY

       House Sec. 4038. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4045. VIDALIA PORT, LOUISIANA

       Senate Sec. 4018. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


      SEC. 4046. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND

       Senate Sec. 3071(b). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4047. CLINTON RIVER, MICHIGAN

       House Sec. 4039. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 4048. HAMBURG AND GREEN OAK TOWNSHIPS, MICHIGAN

       House Sec. 4040. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              SEC. 4049. LAKE ERIE AT LUNA PIER, MICHIGAN

       Senate Sec. 4019. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


       SEC. 4050. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN

       House Sec. 4041. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 4051. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI

       House Sec. 4042. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


            SEC. 4052. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, NEW JERSEY

       House Sec. 4044. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     SEC. 4053. BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY

       House Sec. 4045. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 4054. CARTERET, NEW JERSEY

       House Sec. 4046. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 4055. GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

       House Sec. 4047. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4056. PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY

       House Sec. 4048. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                      SEC. 4057. BATAVIA, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 4049. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              SEC. 4058. BIG SISTER CREEK, EVANS, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 4050. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4059. FINGER LAKES, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 4051. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 4060. LAKE ERIE SHORELINE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 4052. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4061. NEWTOWN CREEK, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 4053. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4062. NIAGARA RIVER, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 4054. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


         SEC. 4063. SHORE PARKWAY GREENWAY, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 4055. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 4064. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 4056. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               SEC. 4065. LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

       House Sec. 4057. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 4066. WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

       House Sec. 4058. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 4067. YADKINVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

       House Sec. 4059. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 4068. FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, OHIO

       Senate Sec. 4022. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                       SEC. 4069. LAKE ERIE, OHIO

       House Sec. 4060. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                      SEC. 4070. OHIO RIVER, OHIO

       House Sec. 4061, Senate Sec. 4024.--Same.


   SEC. 4071. TOLEDO HARBOR DREDGED MATERIAL PLACEMENT, TOLEDO, OHIO

       Senate Sec. 4025. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


   SEC. 4072. TOLEDO HARBOR, MAUMEE RIVER, AND LAKE CHANNEL PROJECT, 
                              TOLEDO, OHIO

       Senate Sec. 4026. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


 SEC. 4073. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENTS, OREGON

       House Sec. 4062. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               SEC. 4074. WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN, OREGON

       House Sec. 4063, Senate Sec. 4038.--Senate recedes.

[[Page 21833]]




           SEC. 4075. CHARTIERS CREEK WATERSHED, PENNSYLVANIA

       House Sec. 4064. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


      SEC. 4076. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PENNSYLVANIA

       House Sec. 4065. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


         SEC. 4077. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION

       House Sec. 4066. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 4078. WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA

       House Sec. 4067. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 4079. YARDLEY BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA

       House Sec. 4068. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             SEC. 4080. RIO VALENCIANO, JUNCOS, PUERTO RICO

       House Sec. 4069. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


SEC. 4081. WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, 
                              RHODE ISLAND

       Senate Sec. 4027. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


        SEC. 4082. CROOKED CREEK, BENNETTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA

       House Sec. 4070. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 4083. BROAD RIVER, YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

       House Sec. 4071. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


         SEC. 4084. SAVANNAH RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA

       Senate Sec. 4028. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 4085. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE

       House Sec. 4072. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 4086. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE

       House Sec. 4073. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 4087. CUMBERLAND RIVER, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

       House Sec. 4074. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       SEC. 4088. LEWIS, LAWRENCE, AND WAYNE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE

       House Sec. 4075. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


     SEC. 4089. WOLF RIVER AND NONCONNAH CREEK, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

       House Sec. 4076. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                       SEC. 4090. ABILENE, TEXAS

       House Sec. 4077. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  SEC. 4091. COASTAL TEXAS ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION, TEXAS

       House Sec. 4078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 4092. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS

       House Sec. 4079. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 4093. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH

       House Sec. 4080. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                      SEC. 4094. SOUTHWESTERN UTAH

       House Sec. 4081. No comparable Senate Section.--Senate 
     Recedes.


      SEC. 4095. ECOSYSTEM AND HYDROPOWER GENERATION DAMS, VERMONT

       Senate Sec. 4030. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


          SEC. 4096. ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

       House Sec. 4083, Senate Sec. 4034.--Senate recedes.


       SEC. 4097. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 4084. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 4098. KENOSHA HARBOR, WISCONSIN

       House Sec. 4085. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 4099. JOHNSONVILLE DAM, JOHNSONVILLE, WISCONSIN

       House Sec. 4087, Senate Sec. 4035.--Same.


                    SEC. 4100. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN

       House Sec. 4086. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                       SEC. 4101. DEBRIS REMOVAL

       Senate Sec. 4036. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS


             SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS

       5001(a)(1). Manatee Harbor Basin, Florida. House 
     Sec. 5001(a)(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       5001(a)(2). Tampa Harbor, Sparkman Channel and Davis 
     Island, Florida. No comparable Senate or House section.
       5001(a)(3). West turning basin, Canaveral Harbor, Florida. 
     House Sec. 5001(a)(2). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       5001(a)(4). Bayou LaFourche Channel, Port Fourchon, 
     Louisiana. House Sec. 5001(a)(3). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       5001(a)(5). Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, Louisiana. 
     House Sec. 5001(a)(4). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       5001(a)(6). Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Industrial 
     Park, Memphis Harbor, Tennessee. House Sec. 5001(a)(5). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       5001(a)(7). Houston Ship Channel, Bayport Cruise Channel 
     and Bayport Cruise turning basin, as part of the existing 
     Bayport Channel, Texas. No comparable Senate or House 
     section.
       5001(a)(8). Pix Bayou Navigation Channel, Chambers County, 
     Texas. House Sec. 5001(a)(6). No comparable Senate section.--
     Senate recedes.
       5001(a)(9). Jacintoport Channel at Houston Ship Channel, 
     Texas. No comparable Senate or House section.
       5001(a)(10). Racine Harbor, Wisconsin. House 
     Sec. 5001(a)(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT

       House Sec. 5002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       Subsection (d) of Sec. 5002 authorizes the Secretary to 
     provide technical assistance to non-federal interests for 
     carrying out watershed management, restoration and 
     development projects in the following locations: Charlotte 
     Harbor watershed, Florida; Those portions of the watersheds 
     of the Chattahoochee, Etowah, Flint, Ocmulgee, and Oconee 
     Rivers lying within the counties of Bartow, Cherokee, 
     Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, 
     Forsyth, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Paulding, Rockdale, and 
     Walton, Georgia; Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois; 
     Amite River basin, Louisiana; East Atchafalaya River basin, 
     Iberville Parish and Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana; Red 
     River watershed, Louisiana; Taunton River basin, 
     Massachusetts; Marlboro Township, New Jersey; Esopus, 
     Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks, Greene, Sullivan, and Ulster 
     Counties, New York; Greenwood Lake watershed, New York and 
     New Jersey; Long Island Sound watershed, New York; Ramapo 
     River watershed, New York; Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio; 
     Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio; Those portions of the 
     watersheds of the Beaver, Upper Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower 
     Allegheny, Kiskiminetas, Lower Monongahela, Youghiogheny, 
     Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers lying within the counties of 
     Beaver, Butler, Lawrence, and Mercer, Pennsylvania; Otter 
     Creek watershed, Pennsylvania; Unami Creek watershed, Milford 
     Township, Pennsylvania; and Sauk River basin, Washington.


                         SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY

       House Sec. 5003. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       Section 5003(a) authorizes the Secretary to provide 
     assistance to enhance dam safety at the following locations: 
     Keith Creek, Rockford, Illinois; Mount Zion Mill Pond Dam, 
     Fulton County, Indiana; Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho; 
     Hamilton Dam, Flint River, Flint, Michigan; Congers Lake Dam, 
     Rockland County, New York; Lake Lucille Dam, New City, New 
     York; Peconic River Dams, town of Riverhead, Suffolk, Long 
     Island, New York; Pine Grove Lakes Dam, Sloatsburg, New York; 
     State Dam, Auburn, New York; Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New 
     York; Brightwood Dam, Concord Township, Ohio; Ingham Spring 
     Dam, Solebury Township, Pennsylvania; Leaser Lake Dam, Lehigh 
     County, Pennsylvania; Stillwater Dam, Monroe County, 
     Pennsylvania; Wissahickon Creek Dam, Montgomery County, 
     Pennsylvania.


              SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS

       House Sec. 5004. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


               SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS

       House Sec. 5005. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       Section 5005(a)(3) adds the following locations to Section 
     212(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 
     U.S.C. 2332(e)): Ascension Parish, Louisiana; East Baton 
     Rouge Parish, Louisiana; Iberville Parish, Louisiana; 
     Livingston Parish, Louisiana; and Pointe Coupee Parish, 
     Louisiana.


        SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS

       House Sec. 5006, Senate Sec. 3008.--Senate recedes.
       The managers recognize that in carrying out the project for 
     the Colonias along the United States-Mexico border, the 
     Secretary may provide assistance to projects in Webb, Zapata, 
     Starr, and Hidalgo counties, Texas.


SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR CERTAIN 
                                PROJECTS

       House Sec. 5007, 5038, and 7010(2). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes, with an amendment.
       Section 5007 directs the Secretary to expedite completion 
     of the reports, and if the Secretary finds that the project 
     is feasible, to expedite completion of construction of 
     following projects: Project for navigation, Whittier, Alaska; 
     Laguna Creek watershed flood damage reduction project, 
     California; Daytona Beach shore protection project, Florida; 
     Flagler Beach shore protection project, Florida; St. Johns 
     County shore protection project, Florida; Chenier Plain 
     environmental restoration project, Louisiana; False River, 
     Louisiana; Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York; Moyer 
     Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York; Steele Creek, Village 
     of Ilion, New York; Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, 
     New York; Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney Point, 
     New York; North River, Peabody, Massachusetts; and Chenango 
     Lake, Chenango County, New York.

[[Page 21834]]

       The managers request that a timetable for the execution and 
     completion of a feasibility cost-sharing agreement and 
     initiation of construction of the Laguna Creek watershed 
     flood damage reduction project, Fremont, California, be 
     provided to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
     the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives within 90 days 
     of the enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     2007.


    SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS

       House Sec. 5008(a), Senate Sec. 4012.--Senate recedes, with 
     an amendment.
       Section 5008(a) directs the Secretary to expedite 
     completion of the following reports, and, if the Secretary 
     determines that the project is justified, authorizes the 
     Secretary to proceed to project preconstruction, engineering 
     and design: Project for water supply, Little Red River, 
     Arkansas; Watershed study, Fountain Creek, north of Pueblo, 
     Colorado; Project for shoreline stabilization, Egmont Key, 
     Florida; Project for navigation, Sabine-Neches Waterway, 
     Texas and Louisiana; and Project for ecosystem restoration, 
     University Lake, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
       In carrying out the review of the project for navigation, 
     Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas and Louisiana, referred to in 
     subsection (a)(3), the Secretary is directed to utilize all 
     current available data, models, and analyses to facilitate 
     the scheduled completion of the Chief of Engineers report.
       House Sec. 5008(b). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

       House Sec. 5009. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 SEC. 5010. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT

       House Sec. 5011, Senate Sec. 3109.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


    SEC. 5011. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROGRAM

       House Sec. 5012, Senate Sec. 3141.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


 SEC. 5012. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION

       House Sec. 5013, Senate Sec. 3142.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                SEC. 5013. GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODELS

       House Sec. 5014, Senate Sec. 3143.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


            SEC. 5014. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION AND PROTECTION

       House Sec. 5015 and 5016, Senate Sec. 5029.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       The Great Lakes contain 134 deep-draft harbors and six 
     connecting channels within the Corps of Engineers' dredging 
     responsibility, including 25 of the nation's largest ports. 
     The total waterborne commerce on the Great Lakes equals 
     nearly 7 percent of the nation's maritime commerce. Recent 
     shortfalls in the Corps' dredging appropriation have delayed 
     dredging at many Great Lakes ports and waterways. The low 
     water levels that have plagued the Lakes since the late 1990s 
     have only exacerbated the problem. As a result, the largest 
     vessels in the Great Lakes fleet must forfeit nearly 270 tons 
     of cargo for each 1-inch reduction in loaded draft. Ocean-
     going vessels in the international trade lose roughly 100 
     tons of cargo for each 1-inch loss of draft.
       Section 5014(a) directs the Secretary, using available 
     appropriated funds, to expedite the operation and 
     maintenance, including dredging, of the navigation features 
     of the Great Lakes and Connecting Channels for the purpose of 
     supporting commercial navigation to authorized project 
     depths.


                    SEC. 5015. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY

       House Sec. 5017. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


      SEC. 5016. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER DISPERSAL BARRIER PROJECT

       House Sec. 5018, Senate Sec. 4021.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                     SEC. 5017. ESTUARY RESTORATION

       Senate Sec. 5002. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


 SEC. 5018. MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MITIGATION, RECOVERY, AND 
 RESTORATION, IOWA, KANSAS, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, 
                       SOUTH DAKOTA, AND WYOMING

       Senate Sec. 5016. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


 SEC. 5019. SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC RIVER BASINS, DELAWARE, 
                  MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 5019, Senate Sec. 5010.--House recedes.


  SEC. 5020. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
                                PROGRAM

       House Sec. 5020, Senate Sec. 3068.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


  SEC. 5021. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RESTORATION, VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND

       Senate Sec. 3124. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                     SEC. 5022. HYPOXIA ASSESSMENT

       House Sec. 5021. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 SEC. 5023. POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AND TRIBUTARY STRATEGY 
                   EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM

       House Sec. 5022. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5024. LOCK AND DAM SECURITY

       House Sec. 5023. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  SEC. 5025. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE 
                         RIVER SALMON SURVIVAL

       House Sec. 5025. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                        SEC. 5026. WAGE SURVEYS

       House Sec. 5135. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                       SEC. 5027. REHABILITATION

       House Sec. 5024. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                       SEC. 5028. AUBURN, ALABAMA

       House Sec. 5026. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             SEC. 5029. PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA

       House Sec. 5027. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                           SEC. 5030. ALASKA

       House Sec. 5028, Senate Sec. 5004.--Senate recedes.


                       SEC. 5031. BARROW, ALASKA

       House Sec. 5029. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             SEC. 5032. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA

       House Sec. 5034. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


       SEC. 5033. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA

       House Sec. 5035, Senate Sec. 3001.--Same.


                    SEC. 5034. TANANA RIVER, ALASKA

       House Sec. 5036. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 5035. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA

       House Sec. 5039. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               SEC. 5036. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS

       House Sec. 5040, Senate Sec. 3007.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


             SEC. 5037. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS

       House Sec. 5041. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 5038. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS

       House Sec. 5042. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                         SEC. 5039. CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 5005. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


   SEC. 5040. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, 
                          STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 5007. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                     SEC. 5041. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5044. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


   SEC. 5042. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; 
                 MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5045. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 5043. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5046. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             SEC. 5044. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5047. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


            SEC. 5045. EASTERN SANTA CLARA BASIN, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5048. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


   SEC. 5046. LA-3 DREDGED MATERIAL OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION, 
                               CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 3016. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5047. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5049. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5048. LOS OSOS, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5050. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


     SEC. 5049. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5051, Senate Sec. 3021.--House recedes.


  SEC. 5050. RAYMOND BASIN, SIX BASINS, CHINO BASIN, AND SAN GABRIEL 
                           BASIN, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5052. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                  SEC. 5051. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5053. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


         SEC. 5052. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA

       House Sec. 5054, Senate Sec. 3025.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


   SEC. 5053. SAN PABLO BAY, CALIFORNIA, WATERSHED AND SUISUN MARSH 
                         ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

       House Sec. 5055, Senate Sec. 4011.--Senate recedes.


                   SEC. 5054. ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA

       Senate Sec. 4008. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.

[[Page 21835]]




         SEC. 5055. UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA

       House Sec. 5056. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 SEC. 5056. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW 
                           MEXICO, AND TEXAS

       Senate Sec. 5008, House Sec. 5002(d)(9).--House recedes, 
     with an amendment.


   SEC. 5057. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, 
                              CONNECTICUT

       House Sec. 5057, Senate Sec. 3030.--Senate recedes.


                    SEC. 5058. STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT

       No comparable Senate or House section.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


  SEC. 5059. DELMARVA CONSERVATION CORRIDOR, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND 
                                VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 5081, Senate Sec. 5009.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


     SEC. 5060. ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND

       House Sec. 5080, Senate Sec. 5011.--Senate recedes.


             SEC. 5061. EAST CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST FLORIDA

       House Sec. 5060. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 5062. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS

       House Sec. 5058. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     SEC. 5063. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 5059. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  SEC. 5064. BIG CREEK, GEORGIA, WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION 
                                PROGRAM

       Senate Sec. 5012. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


     SEC. 5065. METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT

       Senate Sec. 5013. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                      SEC. 5066. SAVANNAH, GEORGIA

       No comparable Senate or House section.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


 SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL UTAH, AND 
                                WYOMING

       Senate Sec. 5014. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


             SEC. 5068. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO

       House Sec. 5062. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 SEC. 5069. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 5066. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


  SEC. 5070. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI FLOOD PROTECTION 
                                PROJECTS

       House Sec. 5063, Senate Sec. 3049.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


              SEC. 5071. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION

       House Sec. 5064, Senate Sec. 3048.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


  SEC. 5072. PROMONTORY POINT THIRD-PARTY REVIEW, CHICAGO SHORELINE, 
                           CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 5067, Senate Sec. 4017. House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


        SEC. 5073. KASKASKIA RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, RESTORATION

       House Sec. 5065. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                     SEC. 5074. SOUTHWEST ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 5068. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 5075. CALUMET REGION, INDIANA

       House Sec. 5070. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 5076. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA

       House Sec. 5071. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                      SEC. 5077. PADUCAH, KENTUCKY

       House Sec. 5072. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 5078. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY

       House Sec. 5073. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5079. WINCHESTER, KENTUCKY

       House Sec. 5074. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 5080. BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 5075. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              SEC. 5081. CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL, LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 5076. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


    SEC. 5082. EAST ATCHAFALAYA BASIN AND AMITE RIVER BASIN REGION, 
                               LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 5077. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


    SEC. 5083. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK PROJECT, LOUISIANA

       Senate Sec. 5028. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                SEC. 5084. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA

       No comparable Senate or House section.


            SEC. 5085. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA REGION, LOUISIANA

       Senate Sec. 5017. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


             SEC. 5086. WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA

       House Sec. 5078. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                    SEC. 5087. CHARLESTOWN, MARYLAND

       House Sec. 5079. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 5088. ST. MARY'S RIVER, MARYLAND

       No comparable House or Senate section.


        SEC. 5089. MASSACHUSETTS DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES

       House Sec. 5082. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 5090. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICHIGAN

       House Sec. 5083. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5091. CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 5084. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 5092. GARRISON AND KATHIO TOWNSHIP, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 5085. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 5093. ITASCA COUNTY, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 5086. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 5094. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 5087. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 5095. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 5088. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 5096. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA

       House Sec. 5089, Senate Sec. 4020.--Senate recedes.


                         SEC. 5097. MISSISSIPPI

       Senate Sec. 5018. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


    SEC. 5098. HARRISON, HANCOCK, AND JACKSON COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI

       House Sec. 5090. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 5099. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS

       House Sec. 5091. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     SEC. 5100. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

       House Sec. 5092. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


      SEC. 5101. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL GREENWAYS, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

       No comparable Senate or House section.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to

[[Page 21836]]

     the traditional Corps mission areas that are being built as 
     an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


                      SEC. 5102. MISSOULA, MONTANA

       No comparable Senate or House section.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


          SEC. 5103. ST. MARY PROJECT, GLACIER COUNTY, MONTANA

       Senate Sec. 5019. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       In carrying out this section, the managers expect the 
     Secretary to conduct all hiring and contracting in accordance 
     with the requirements set forth in the Indian Self 
     Determination Act.


     SEC. 5104. LOWER PLATTE RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, NEBRASKA

       Senate Sec. 5020, House Sec. 5002(d)(8).--House recedes, 
     with an amendment.


           SEC. 5105. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY

       House Sec. 5093. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 5106. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK

       House Sec. 5094. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           SEC. 5107. COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 5095. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       SEC. 5108. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 5096. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 5109. HUDSON RIVER, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 5097. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


                 SEC. 5110. MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NEW YORK

       House Sec. 5098. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


     SEC. 5111. NORTH HEMPSTED AND GLEN COVE NORTH SHORE WATERSHED 
                         RESTORATION, NEW YORK

       No comparable Senate or House section.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


                     SEC. 5112. ROCHESTER, NEW YORK

       No comparable Senate or House section.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


                       SEC. 5113. NORTH CAROLINA

       Senate Sec. 5021. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                SEC. 5114. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

       House Sec. 5100. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       SEC. 5115. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, NORTH CAROLINA

       House Sec. 5099. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                      SEC. 5116. CINCINNATI, OHIO

       House Sec. 5101. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


          SEC. 5117. OHIO RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

       Senate Sec. 5022. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


 SEC. 5118. TOUSSAINT RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OHIO

       House Sec. 5102, Senate Sec. 3095.--House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


      SEC. 5119. STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLANNING, OKLAHOMA

       Senate Sec. 5023. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 5120. FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON

       House Sec. 5104. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               SEC. 5121. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

       House Sec. 5105. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 5122. CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

       House Sec. 5106. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 5123. KEHLY RUN DAMS, PENNSYLVANIA

       House Sec. 5107. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


          SEC. 5124. LEHIGH RIVER, LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

       House Sec. 5108. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 5125. NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA

       House Sec. 5109. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  SEC. 5126. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK

       House Sec. 5110, Senate Sec. 3105.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


           SEC. 5127. CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

       House Sec. 5111. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


          SEC. 5128. LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA

       No comparable House or Senate section.


  SEC. 5129. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
        TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.

       House Sec. 5112, Senate Sec. 5024.--Same.


                       SEC. 5130. EAST TENNESSEE

       House Sec. 5113. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 5131. FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE

       House Sec. 5114. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.

[[Page 21837]]




        SEC. 5132. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE

       House Sec. 5115. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5133. NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

       No comparable Senate or House section.
       The managers recognize the importance of waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects to local communities and 
     that, in some instances, waterfront and riverfront 
     development plans contain elements that fall within 
     traditional Corps mission areas of navigation, flood damage 
     reduction, and environmental restoration, and associated 
     recreation. However, the managers believe that waterfront and 
     riverfront development projects, in and of themselves, are 
     not a Corps mission and Corps participation in these 
     development projects must be limited to traditional Corps 
     missions. While recreation is frequently an element of 
     waterfront and riverfront development projects, the managers 
     do not intend for the Corps to carry out purely recreational 
     elements of the project, unrelated to the traditional 
     missions of the Corps. The managers direct the Corps to limit 
     its work on recreation features to only those elements that 
     relate to the traditional Corps mission areas that are being 
     built as an element of the larger waterfront and riverfront 
     development project plan.


             SEC. 5134. NONCONNAH WEIR, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

       Senate Sec. 3110. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 5135. TENNESSEE RIVER PARTNERSHIP

       House Sec. 5117. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             SEC. 5136. TOWN CREEK, LENOIR CITY, TENNESSEE

       House Sec. 5116. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


   SEC. 5137. UPPER MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT, TENNESSEE, ARKANSAS, AND 
                              MISSISSIPPI

       House Sec. 5118. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                            SEC. 5138. TEXAS

       Senate Sec. 5025. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                SEC. 5139. BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED, TEXAS

       House Sec. 5119. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 SEC. 5140. DALLAS COUNTY REGION, TEXAS

       House Sec. 5120. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               SEC. 5141. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS

       House Sec. 5121. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5142. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

       House Sec. 5122, Senate Sec. 3117.--House recedes.


               SEC. 5143. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS

       House Sec. 5123, Senate Sec. 4029.--Senate recedes.


                     SEC. 5144. ONION CREEK, TEXAS

       House Sec. 5124. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               SEC. 5145. CONNECTICUT RIVER DAMS, VERMONT

       Senate Sec. 5026. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


         SEC. 5146. LAKE CHAMPLAIN CANAL, VERMONT AND NEW YORK

       Senate Sec. 4032. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


            SEC. 5147. DYKE MARSH, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 5126. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


            SEC. 5148. EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 5125. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5149. JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA

       Senate Sec. 3125. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


           SEC. 5150. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASHINGTON

       House Sec. 5127, Senate Sec. 4033.--Senate recedes.


           SEC. 5151. HAMILTON ISLAND CAMPGROUND, WASHINGTON

       House Sec. 5128. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 SEC. 5152. EROSION CONTROL, PUGET ISLAND, WAHKIAKUM COUNTY, WASHINGTON

       House Sec. 5129, Senate Sec. 3127.--House recedes.


                   SEC. 5153. WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON

       House Sec. 5130. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


        SEC. 5154. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL

       House Sec. 5131. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    SEC. 5155. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 5132. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   SEC. 5156. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA

       House Sec. 5133. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


   SEC. 5157. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
                               INTERESTS

       House Sec. 5134, Senate Sec. 2011.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.
       (12) Perris, California
       (13) Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, Illinois.
       (14) Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
       (15) Buffalo Bayou, Texas.
       (16) Halls Bayou, Texas.
       (17) Menomonee River Watershed, Wisconsin.


         SEC. 5158. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS

       House Sec. 5136, Senate Sec. 5003. House recedes, with an 
     amendment.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES


          SEC. 6001. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLORIDA

       House Sec. 6001, Senate Sec. 3037.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                       SEC. 6002. PILOT PROJECTS

       House Sec. 6002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                        SEC. 6003. MAXIMUM COSTS

       House Sec. 6004, Senate Sec. 3034.--Senate recedes, with an 
     amendment.


                           SEC. 6004. CREDIT

       House Sec. 6006. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       The managers are concerned about the practice of the non-
     Federal sponsor performing work on the project without a 
     written agreement with the Corps, and then relying upon 
     legislation to receive credit against the non-Federal share. 
     Consistent with section 2003 of this bill, for future work to 
     be considered eligible for credit, it must be performed under 
     a written agreement with the Secretary.


                   SEC. 6005. OUTREACH AND ASSISTANCE

       House Sec. 6007. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                SEC. 6006. CRITICAL RESTORATION PROJECTS

       House Sec. 6008, Senate Sec. 3036. House recedes, with an 
     amendment.


  SEC. 6007. REGIONAL ENGINEERING MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION

       House Sec. 6011. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  INITIAL PROJECTS, COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN, FLORIDA

       The managers have agreed to delete House section 6003 that 
     would have increased the maximum cost for three initial 
     projects of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan 
     (CERP)--Water Conservation Areas 3A/3B Levee Seepage 
     Management, C-11 Impoundment and Stormwater Treatment Area, 
     and C-9 Impoundment and Stormwater Treatment Area. These 
     projects are still undergoing study and final cost estimates 
     are not available. Project components of CERP have seen their 
     cost estimates vary widely during the project formulation and 
     design phases. The managers support the completion of the 
     studies on these projects prior to taking action on their 
     cost estimates. Until the final project implementation report 
     recommends final cost estimates, the managers believe that it 
     is premature to enact new cost figures.
       The project implementation reports for the three projects 
     are projected to be completed in 2008. The managers expect to 
     consider the correct authorization levels for these projects 
     in a water resources bill next year.


               MODIFIED WATER DELIVERIES PROJECT, FLORIDA

       The Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act 
     of 1989, Public Law 101-229, (1989 Act), authorized the 
     expansion of Everglades National Park (Park), a change to 
     more natural water deliveries to the Park, and flood damage 
     reduction measures for the area known as the eight and one-
     half square mile area. Of the three activities, there still 
     has been no change in water deliveries to the Park. Without a 
     change in water delivery to the Park, restoration of the 
     Everglades, and many of the projects authorized as components 
     of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) in 
     2000, will not succeed.
       To achieve more natural water deliveries to the Park, it is 
     necessary to modify the way water crosses under the Tamiami 
     Trail Highway. The managers of the bill are concerned that 
     nearly 18 years have passed since the 1989 Act, and the 
     restoration of more natural water flows has not occurred. 
     While the House bill contained language directing a 
     particular option toward restoring flows, the Corps of 
     Engineers and other interested parties have indicated that 
     the ``two-bridge'' option may not be the preferred solution. 
     However, the managers are concerned that continuing re-
     analysis of options for modifying water deliveries will only 
     delay benefits to the Everglades.
       The managers have observed proposals related to improved 
     water deliveries to the Park come and go over the years, yet 
     the more natural flows to the Park do not occur. It is time 
     for the Chief of Engineers to implement measures to improve 
     water deliveries and adopt an adaptive management approach 
     toward restoring flows.
       The managers have agreed to delete the House language on 
     the two-bridge option. The managers direct the Chief of 
     Engineers to re-examine options to modify the water delivery 
     to the Park. However, the managers also direct the Chief of 
     Engineer to pursue immediate steps to increase flows to the 
     Park of at least 1400 cubic feet per second, without 
     significantly increasing the risk of roadbed failure. Flows 
     less than 1400 cubic feet per second will not produce 
     measurable benefits to the Park.
       The managers direct the Chief of Engineers to proceed with 
     increasing flows to the Park upon the completion of the eight 
     and one-half square mile area construction this fall.

[[Page 21838]]

     Completing that construction removes the current constraint 
     on water levels within the Northeast Shark River Slough area 
     of the Park.
       The managers direct the Chief of Engineers to re-examine 
     the prior reports and environmental documentation associated 
     with modifying water deliveries to the Park prepared under 
     the 1989 Act, and to evaluate the practicable alternatives 
     for increasing the flow of water under the highway and into 
     the Park. The recommendations resulting from this re-
     examination are to be for improving flows in a manner that is 
     consistent with the direction in the 1989 Act that the 
     Secretary of the Army construct modifications ``to improve 
     water deliveries into the park and shall, to the extent 
     practicable, take steps to restore the natural hydrological 
     conditions within the Park.'' The managers direct that the 
     flows to the Park have a minimum target of 4000 cubic feet 
     per second so as to address the restoration envisioned in the 
     1989 Act.
       The Chief of Engineers is to develop the recommendations in 
     consultation with the Department of the Interior, the 
     Department of Transportation, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians 
     of Florida, the Seminole Tribe of Florida, and the State of 
     Florida, and shall consider environmental benefits produced, 
     cost, related CERP improvements, and other relevant factors.
       The recommendations of the Chief of Engineers shall 
     identify a plan for increasing and distributing water flows 
     to the Park through project components that take into account 
     the fact that a subsequent project involving modifications to 
     the Tamiami Trail Highway may be accomplished under the 
     authority of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000. 
     Modifications that are not compatible with that project or 
     are duplicative should be avoided.
       The recommendations of the Chief of Engineers shall be 
     available for public review and comment consistent with 
     applicable law, and shall be submitted to Congress not later 
     than July 1, 2008.
       Concurrent with the preparation of recommendations for 
     modifying water deliveries under the 1989 Act, the managers 
     direct the Chief of Engineers to initiate an evaluation of 
     the Tamiami Trail project component of the Comprehensive 
     Everglades Restoration Plan authorized by section 
     601(b)(2)(C)(viii) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     2000, or other appropriate authorities, as soon as 
     practicable. The recommendations shall include an evaluation 
     of modifying Tamiami Trail from Krome Avenue to the boundary 
     of the Big Cypress National Park to restore natural flows and 
     ecological connectivity through the Park to Florida Bay. Upon 
     completion of these recommendations the Chief of Engineers 
     shall submit the recommendations to the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate.
       The House language in section 6009 also addressed cost 
     allocations between the Secretary and the Secretary of the 
     Interior. The managers direct that any arrangements for 
     sharing of costs between the Secretaries be prospective only. 
     The mangers do not support any arrangement where the 
     Secretary of the Interior is credited with expenditures for 
     land acquisition toward the costs of modifying the water 
     delivery to the Park. These costs represent separate 
     responsibilities within the missions of the Department of the 
     Army and the Department of the Interior, and the costs of one 
     should not be used to offset the costs of the other.

                   TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA


                         SEC. 7001. DEFINITIONS

       House Sec. 7001. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                     SEC. 7002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

       House Sec. 7002, Senate Sec. 1003(h).--Senate recedes, with 
     an amendment.


                   SEC. 7003. LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

       House Sec. 7003, Senate Sec. 1003(a) and (b).--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


SEC. 7004. COASTAL LOUISIANA ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION TASK 
                                 FORCE

       House Sec. 7004, Senate Sec. 1003(i).--House recedes, with 
     an amendment.


                    SEC. 7005. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS

       House Sec. 7005, Senate Sec. 1003(m).--Senate recedes, with 
     an amendment.


                        SEC. 7006. CONSTRUCTION

       House Sec. 7006, Senate Sec. 1003(c), (d), (e), (f) and 
     (j).--House recedes, with an amendment.
       For the benefit of the Louisiana coastal area, the managers 
     have authorized a number of projects and programs. In the 
     case of the Additional Projects authorized in section 
     7006(e), the managers have authorized 4 projects for 
     construction and have authorized 6 other projects contingent 
     upon a Chief's Report being completed no later than December 
     31, 2010. The managers understand that the 4 projects 
     authorized for construction are closer to having a completed 
     study than are the other 6 projects. The managers expect the 
     Secretary to plan and construct all of these projects on a 
     priority and a schedule that maximizes the efficient and 
     timely delivery of benefits.


                   SEC. 7007. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE

       House Sec. 7007, Senate Sec. 1003(g).--Senate recedes, with 
     an amendment.


                    SEC. 7008. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

       House Sec. 7008, Senate Sec. 1003(k).--Senate recedes.


                     SEC. 7009. INDEPENDENT REVIEW

       House Sec. 7009, Senate Sec. 1003(n).--House recedes, with 
     an amendment.


                      SEC. 7010. EXPEDITED REPORTS

       House Sec. 7010, Senate Sec. 1003(t).--House recedes, with 
     an amendment.


                          SEC. 7011. REPORTING

       House Sec. 7011. No comparable Senate provision.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  SEC. 7012. NEW ORLEANS AND VICINITY

       House Sec. 7012, Senate Sec. 1003(p).--House recedes, with 
     an amendment.


                SEC. 7013. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET

       House Sec. 7013, Senate Sec. 1003(s).--House recedes, with 
     an amendment.


            SEC. 7014. HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION

       Senate Sec. 1003(u). No comparable House provision.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


                   SEC. 7015. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW

       Senate Sec. 1003(q). No comparable House provision.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.


              SEC. 7016. LOWER JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

       Senate Sec. 1003(r). No comparable House provision.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment.

    TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATERWAY SYSTEM


                         SEC. 8001. DEFINITIONS

       House Sec. 8001, Senate Sec. 1002(a).--Same.


          SEC. 8002. NAVIGATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS AND RESTORATION

       House Sec. 8002. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 SEC. 8003. AUTHORIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF NAVIGATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

       House Sec. 8003, Senate Sec. 1002(b).--House recedes, with 
     an amendment.


             SEC. 8004. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AUTHORIZATION

       House Sec. 8004, Senate Sec. 1002(c).--Senate recedes, with 
     an amendment.


                     SEC. 8005. COMPARABLE PROGRESS

       House Sec. 8005, Senate Sec. 1002(d).--Senate recedes.

                TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM


                         SEC. 9001. SHORT TITLE

       Senate Sec. 2051. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment. 


                        SEC. 9002. DEFINITIONS 

       Senate Sec. 2052. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment. 


                 SEC. 9003. COMMITTEE ON LEVEE SAFETY 

       Senate Sec. 2053 and 2054. No comparable House section.--
     House recedes, with an amendment. 


             SEC. 9004. INVENTORY AND INSPECTION OF LEVEES 

       Senate Sec. 2054. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment. 


           SEC. 9005. LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION 

       No comparable House or Senate section. 


              SEC. 9006. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS 

       Senate Sec. 2055. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes, with an amendment. 

                           ADDITIONAL MATTERS

       The managers request the Secretary make it a priority to 
     reimburse non-federal project sponsors for carrying out 
     federal projects in accordance with cooperative agreements. 
     These projects provide benefits to the federal taxpayer and 
     the Corps of Engineers should make every effort to reimburse 
     non-federal project sponsors the appropriate amount in a 
     timely manner. In one instance, Manatee County, Florida 
     carried out the Anna Maria Island beach re-nourishment under 
     a cooperative agreement with the Army Corps of Engineers for 
     construction of the Manatee County Shore Protection Project 
     in 2002. For Fiscal Year 2002, Congress appropriated $1 
     million for the project, and in Fiscal Year 2003, Congress 
     appropriated $3.5 million for the project. Yet, Manatee 
     County has received only $2.3 million in reimbursement from 
     the Army Corps of Engineers and is still owed over $1.7 
     million for work that was completed in 2002. Many local 
     communities and other non-federal project sponsors that 
     undertake federal projects put their financial security at 
     stake and timely reimbursement by the Corps of Engineers is 
     critical to their economic prosperity.
       The Corps recently determined that the stability of Wolf 
     Creek Dam is threatened by seepage under and around the dam, 
     increasing the risk of catastrophic failure. The managers 
     recognize that the Corps has cited an extreme concern for 
     safety and lowered the level of Lake Cumberland dramatically 
     to mitigate the risk of failure. The managers recognize that 
     the Nashville District of the Corps has recommended that this 
     project be classified as a dam safety project and therefore 
     subject to reimbursement rates in accordance with the Dam 
     Safety Act. Given the threat to safety as cited by the Corps 
     and the recommendation by the Corps district office, the 
     managers urge the administration to accept the recommendation 
     of the Corps to classify this project as dam safety, and to 
     finalize such a decision as soon as possible.

[[Page 21839]]

       The managers have increasingly heard concerns from Members 
     of Congress regarding the backlog in the processing of 
     permits under section 404 of the Clean Water Act. In 
     particular, the Jacksonville District of the Corps of 
     Engineers processes 1/8 of all the permits nationwide. The 
     managers direct the Chief of Engineers to examine the 
     permitting workload and consider alternatives for better 
     distribution of the workload. The managers also direct the 
     Chief of Engineers to work with States using current 
     authorities to minimize the time required for the Corps to 
     respond to permit applications. 

                     COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XXI

       Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House 
     of Representatives, the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure is required to include a list of congressional 
     earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits 
     (as defined in clause 9(d), 9(e), or 9(f) of rule XXI of the 
     Rules of the House of Representatives) in the Conference 
     Report. The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
     requires Members of Congress to comply with all requirements 
     of clause 9(d), 9(e), or 9(f) of rule XXI. The following 
     table provides the list of such provisions included in the 
     Conference Report:

[[Page 21840]]

     TH31JY07.001
     


[[Page 21841]]

     TH31JY07.002
     


[[Page 21842]]

     TH31JY07.003
     


[[Page 21843]]

     TH31JY07.004
     


[[Page 21844]]

     TH31JY07.005
     


[[Page 21845]]

     TH31JY07.006
     


[[Page 21846]]

     TH31JY07.007
     


[[Page 21847]]

     TH31JY07.008
     


[[Page 21848]]

     TH31JY07.009
     


[[Page 21849]]

     TH31JY07.010
     


[[Page 21850]]

     TH31JY07.011
     


[[Page 21851]]

     TH31JY07.012
     


[[Page 21852]]

     TH31JY07.013
     


[[Page 21853]]

     TH31JY07.014
     


[[Page 21854]]

     TH31JY07.015
     


[[Page 21855]]

     TH31JY07.016
     


[[Page 21856]]

     TH31JY07.017
     


[[Page 21857]]

     TH31JY07.018
     


[[Page 21858]]

     TH31JY07.019
     


[[Page 21859]]

     TH31JY07.020
     


[[Page 21860]]

     TH31JY07.021
     


[[Page 21861]]

     TH31JY07.022
     


[[Page 21862]]

     TH31JY07.023
     


[[Page 21863]]

     TH31JY07.024
     


[[Page 21864]]

     TH31JY07.025
     


[[Page 21865]]

     TH31JY07.026
     


[[Page 21866]]

     TH31JY07.027
     


[[Page 21867]]

     TH31JY07.028
     


[[Page 21868]]

     TH31JY07.029
     


[[Page 21869]]

     TH31JY07.030
     


[[Page 21870]]

     TH31JY07.031
     


[[Page 21871]]

     TH31JY07.032
     


[[Page 21872]]

     TH31JY07.033
     


[[Page 21873]]

     TH31JY07.034
     


[[Page 21874]]

     TH31JY07.035
     


[[Page 21875]]

     TH31JY07.036
     


[[Page 21876]]

     TH31JY07.037
     


[[Page 21877]]

     TH31JY07.038
     


[[Page 21878]]

     TH31JY07.039
     


[[Page 21879]]

     TH31JY07.040
     


[[Page 21880]]

     TH31JY07.041
     


[[Page 21881]]

     TH31JY07.042
     


[[Page 21882]]

     TH31JY07.043
     


[[Page 21883]]

     TH31JY07.044
     


[[Page 21884]]

     TH31JY07.045
     


[[Page 21885]]

     TH31JY07.046
     


[[Page 21886]]

     TH31JY07.047
     


[[Page 21887]]

     From the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for 
     consideration of the House bill and the Senate amendment, and 
     modifications committed to conference:
     James L. Oberstar,
     Eddie Bernice Johnson,
     Ellen O. Tauscher,
     Brian Baird,
     Brian Higgins,
     Harry E. Mitchell,
     Steve Kagen,
     Jerry McNerney,
     John L. Mica,
     John J. Duncan, Jr.,
     Vernon J. Ehlers,
     R.H. Baker,
     Henry E. Brown, Jr.,
     John Boozman,
     From the Committee on Natural Resources, for consideration of 
     secs. 2014, 2023, and 6009 of the House bill, and secs. 3023, 
     5008, and 5016 of the Senate amendment, and modifications 
     committed to conference:
     Nick Rahall,
     Grace F. Napolitano,
     Cathy McMorris Rodgers,
                                Managers on the Part of the House.

     Barbara Boxer,
     Max Baucus,
     Joe Lieberman,
     Tom Carper,
     Hillary Rodham Clinton,
     Frank R. Lautenberg,
     James M. Inhofe,
     John Warner,
     George V. Voinovich,
     Johnny Isakson,
     David Vitter,
     Managers on the Part of the Senate.

                          ____________________