[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 152 (2006), Part 7]
[House]
[Pages 9830-9834]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




            ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 4, 2005, the gentlewoman from Tennessee (Mrs. Blackburn) is 
recognized for half the time until midnight as the designee of the 
majority leader.
  Mrs. BLACKBURN. Mr. Speaker, I appreciate that you are yielding the 
time to us, and we are really pleased to be on the floor tonight to 
talk about some of the work that we have done over the past few weeks.
  Before we start, I do want to say that we are very mindful that this 
is Memorial Day weekend. We are all looking forward to going home and 
being with our constituents, and we are very respectful and 
appreciative of the families who have served our Nation who have given 
the ultimate sacrifice, and we want to express to those families our 
continued condolences for their losses, and we also want to express to 
them our thanks for how they have sacrificed and served and helped to 
further the cause of freedom.
  We would not have the opportunity to stand in this hall, this 
wonderful People's House tonight, if it were not for the brave men and 
women who serve in uniform to protect our freedom. Because they are so 
important to us, we have passed some legislation, the Respect For 
Fallen Heroes Act, which will preserve the dignity of the men and women 
who have lost their lives and show respect for those families. That 
passed this afternoon in this body, and we thank Mr. Rogers of Michigan 
and Mr. Buyer, who chairs our Veterans Affairs Committee, for their 
work on those efforts.
  Mr. Simmons, the gentleman from Connecticut, and I have filed a bill 
this week which is the Veterans Identity Theft Protection Act. It is 
H.R. 5464. This was done in response to the egregious, egregious leak 
and actions from the Veterans Affairs Department and the employee there 
who lost the identity information of 26.5 million of our veterans.
  We are going to be moving forward on that legislation to protect and 
try to make right that situation with our veterans when we return. This 
is something that should not have occurred. It is a failure of the 
bureaucracy, and it is something that the Members of this House are 
moving forward to address.
  Before we get into talking about our successes in this body, the 
bills that we have passed, the legislation that we are working hard on 
for the American people, I want to say a little bit about the 
immigration legislation. And after we finish our conversation this 
evening, we are going to finish up with more conversation on the 
immigration legislation that our friends across the dome in the Senate 
passed.
  Mr. Speaker, I am going to have to tell you that the legislation that 
the

[[Page 9831]]

other body passed, in my opinion, is a form of amnesty. I have been and 
remain solidly opposed to amnesty, and I do stand opposed to that 
legislation that they have passed.
  I do continue to support the bill that we passed in the House last 
fall and sent to the Senate. We know that the Members of this body are 
going to continue to stand solid that we need to secure our Nation's 
border first, first and foremost, and regain the trust and confidence 
of the American people, and make certain that they know that we value, 
we value, what this Nation stands for and that the sovereignty of this 
Nation indeed is worth fighting for.
  As we talk about where we have concentrated our efforts through the 
first part of this year, I want to draw attention to a couple of 
things. We have passed tax relief. We have taken actions and the 
President signed into law last week the tax reconciliation bill which 
addressed some of the tax issues, extensions that we had passed 
previously. We know that there is a second bill that will come within 
the next few weeks as we address other extensions of tax reductions.
  We know that these work. We know that tax reductions work, and we 
know that this has helped to fuel the economic growth that we are 
seeing in this country.
  We know that the 18 quarters of sustained economic growth are because 
this economy is robust. We know that the Federal Government doesn't 
create jobs, it is the free enterprise system that creates these jobs. 
So, knowing this and realizing this, is the reason that we had the tax 
relief signed into law last week.
  We have also passed a budget, a budget bill that for the second year 
in a row will put us on the path to deficit reduction. This is so 
important, Mr. Speaker. It is important for a couple of different 
reasons, because when we work toward reducing what the Federal 
Government spends, when we work toward reining in the size of the 
Federal Government, we know that that helps with our economy. We know 
that that is a step in the right direction.
  You know, one of the things on our economy I do want to mention is 
that our first quarter growth has been revised up from 4.8 percent to 
5.3 percent, and our unemployment rate is at near historic lows. This 
is the result of our economic policies and the fiscal policies that we 
have in this House.
  We have taken other action too. Our energy situation in this country, 
we took action today in this body with looking at where we drill, where 
we explore, and doing this domestically, looking at the oil supply for 
this Nation.
  I stood here earlier today and said, you know, we can't have it both 
ways. The liberals can't have it both ways. You can't oppose anything 
that is to be done on alternative fuels and you can't oppose drilling 
in ANWR and you can't oppose other forms of power generation and then 
complain about high gas prices. It just doesn't ring true, and the 
people know it doesn't ring true.
  But we passed legislation in this body to increase our oil supply, to 
do it domestically, and we are sending it over to the Senate. We know 
they are going to be on the spot, and we will encourage them to take 
action. They have to recognize that this is a problem, and we certainly 
are looking forward to their moving forward on that legislation.
  Mr. Speaker, at this time I will yield to the gentleman from Texas, 
Judge Carter, who has done such a wonderful job being a part of our 
team that we have as we move forward with the agenda that the American 
people want to see us working on, working on prosperity, working on our 
security, being sure that this Nation is productive, that it is safe, 
and it is secure.
  At this time I yield to the gentleman from Texas.

                              {time}  2245

  Mr. CARTER. I thank the gentlewoman from Tennessee for yielding me 
the time.
  Mr. Speaker, you know, we are mighty proud that we serve in the 
people's House. And what we try to do and we endeavor every day to meet 
is what the people of the United States care about and need.
  Mr. Speaker, I am very proud of the accomplishments of the Republican 
majority over the period of time that I have served in this Congress, 
because the efforts that we have made have been for the lives of the 
people of the United States and to a lesser extent people around the 
world
  Mr. Speaker, as my colleagues has just told you, we have had one of 
the longest continued periods of prosperity in the history of the 
Republic. But let's relate this to people, real people. Let me share a 
story with you about a young man that lives in Round Rock, Texas.
  He got laid off. It has been about almost 3 years now. He got laid 
off on a job. He had a good job. He had a college education. He got 
laid off and it was a bad time for that young man at that time because 
he had a brand now baby girl.
  Life looked a little bleak for him and for his family. But he, being 
a typical American, who would never say no, he went out and got two 
part-time jobs to keep the wolf away from the door at his house as he 
looked for another job.
  But about the same time within that neighborhood, we started to see 
what happens when you give the American people their tax money back and 
let them spend and invest their tax money, based upon a tax bill passed 
by this Congress for the people of the United States.
  For those taxpayers who pay taxes, we reduced their taxes. And that 
money was starting to work on behalf of this young man in Round Rock, 
Texas. The other day I ran into that kid with his almost 4-year-old 
daughter now coming back from one of her little dance recitals, on 
their way to their new home.
  He was real proud of his new job, which is directly associated with 
providing a satellite industry that services the new Toyota plant that 
is opening in San Antonio, Texas. All of this, Mr. Speaker, is the 
result of the good tax policy of this House which encourages 
investment, employs people, and brings our unemployment to a record of 
all time, consistent low unemployment.
  But it is really about that little girl and her daddy and her mamma 
and how life is better for them in Texas today. These stories, those 
untold stories are everywhere in this Nation as a result of the actions 
of this House.
  I am very honored and privileged and humbled by the fact that I now 
in my direct represent the largest military facility on earth, Ft. Hood 
Texas. 50,000 solders have marched to war on multiple occasions on 
behalf of this Nation in the very recent past, and currently we have 
almost 19,000 solders over there now doing their duty for the United 
States.
  And this House remembers these people in uniform who are serving our 
Nation. And we have remembered them by the greatest increase in 
spending on behalf of our veterans, overwhelming what was done in the 
past few decades.
  We gave our military retirees and our veterans the opportunity to 
have better health care, and we strengthened TRICARE. We strengthened 
veterans benefits. We have increased benefits for veterans every year. 
And the veterans life is better than it was 4 years ago.
  And they know it and they are grateful for it. And we solved a 
concurrent receipt problem that they had for 100 years. Mr. Speaker, 
why do we do it? Because those are the people of the United States. And 
this House is about the people.
  As we face an immigration debate, an immigration debate that harms 
our Nation, the fact that we have got an invasion coming across our 
border, it was the House, the people's House that recognized it, not 
only the strain and stress upon the American people, but the harm being 
done to those foreign invaders.
  They came in unlawfully into this country. Let us not forget these 
human beings that come across this border who suffer and hide in the 
shadows. But this House stepped up and said we are going to stop the 
bleeding. And we passed, what has it been, almost 8 months ago, passed 
a bill that said

[[Page 9832]]

enough is enough. We are putting resources on the border and we are 
going to put a stop to it.
  And this House is going to stand firm to hold the border secure of 
the United States for who? For the American people.
  Mr. Speaker, I am very proud and very humbled that I have colleagues 
such as my colleagues that are here tonight that are going to speak to 
you to tell you that we have done our duty for the people of America. 
And when we see that we have given them the extra income, we have given 
them the freedom of their time, we have allowed people to invest, and 
maybe they can give up that second job, so they can go to the ball 
park, take vacations, have a life with their families, which we 
treasure so greatly in this country.
  Mr. Speaker, that is what it is all about. It is all about the people 
of the United States. And it is all about the people's House 
remembering the people. As Mrs. Blackburn said, tomorrow we are going 
to go home. I get home every weekend, and most of the Members of the 
House do that, because we want to be with the folks that sent us up 
here.
  We want to know where they are shopping, what they are spending, how 
much their milk costs, not the milk in Washington. We want to be able 
to say they are our neighbors, because that is what we are up here for, 
to represent our neighbors. And I think we have a proud record that we 
can go back to our neighbors on and say we have given you a better 
life.
  Life is better today as the result of the people's House, the House 
of Representatives. I am honored that I have the opportunity to serve 
that House. I am honored to be with the colleagues that are here 
tonight, and all of my colleagues, especially my Republican colleague 
on this side of the aisle who never throw up the obstructions that we 
face from the other side, but always try to do what is right for the 
people.
  Energy, the other issues that the people are so concerned about, we 
have got a solution not rhetoric. And we are moving forward as Mrs. 
Blackburn said.
  Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the gentlewoman from Tennessee, my 
mother's home State, and say that I am very, very pleased to tell and 
report to you today that the people's House still firmly stands for the 
people of the United States. With that I yield back.
  Mrs. BLACKBURN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Texas. As he 
said, tax relief works and the actions taken by this body in 2001 and 
in 2003 going ahead and moving forward again and addressing and 
extending those tax reductions, finding AMT relief, looking at 
dividends for our senior citizens, all of that works. America works 
well when Americans are in charge.
  The free enterprise system works well when small businesses and 
individuals who have the dream of owning and running that business have 
the capital to invest and get out there and work very hard to make 
those dreams come true for them, for their families.
  As I said earlier, our budget that we have passed puts us on the path 
to deficit reduction. This is the second year in a row that we have 
passed a budget that reduces what we are spending. You know, Mr. 
Speaker, there are some on the left that prefer to talk about something 
called PAYGO. And they like to say, well, we need to enact PAYGO.
  And as our citizens hear this over the weekend, I hope they will know 
that that means that they are going to raise your taxes as needed to 
cover Government spending.
  Now, in Tennessee, we feel like that government is never going to get 
enough of your money. Their appetite for your money always grows. 
Government is never going to get enough money to cover everything that 
they would like to spend, because the bureaucracy, this huge great big 
out-of-control bureaucracy that is a monument, a monument built by the 
Democrats, a monument to them here in this town.
  They like to keep the control. They like to keep your cash. They 
think they have the first right of refusal on your paycheck. And we 
think that the citizens have that right of first refusal. You know, 
Ronald Reagan said that we do not have a revenue problem, we have a 
spending problem. And that is exactly right.
  And that is why we have taken the actions we have taken in our 
budget. I commend Chairman Nussle and the Budget Committee for the work 
that they have done on those efforts.
  You know I have mentioned that bureaucracy. We all know that we have 
three branches of Government. We have the legislative, the executive, 
and the judicial branch. But, Mr. Speaker, it should come as no 
surprise what we have seen happen over the past 2 or 3 decades is this 
great big bureaucracy.
  That is very difficult when they have to respond to you. All of us 
get frustrated when you call, you dial a number, and you get put on 
hold. They tell you to push a button and wait. You have nameless, 
faceless, unidentified bureaucrats that are making decisions for our 
constituents and our citizens.
  They feel as if they know best, because they feel like they are in 
control, that they are outside of the oversight, that they do not need 
to answer the questions that we ask on behalf of the citizens. A lot of 
us have gotten really frustrated. We have watched that bureaucracy. We 
watched it during Katrina. We have been watching it for years. And as 
some of my constituents say, whether it is the IRS, the EPA, or OSHA, 
sometimes you just cannot get them to respond to you.
  So one of the things that we are focusing on is working to be certain 
that that bureaucracy gets right-sized. We have heard of it in the 
corporate world for years. Right-sizing, retooling, reorganizing, 
looking for efficiencies.
  It seems like it is done the world over. We see corporations do it. 
We see small business do it. We see families do it. We see local and 
state governments do it but not the Federal Government. That 
bureaucracy thinks it can just grow on auto pilot.
  Why? Because they think they can come in and get first right of 
refusal on your paycheck. We have decided that it is time to tackle 
that. We have worked on this through the past couple of budgets. We 
have worked diligently. And when we come back from our Memorial Day 
break, Mr. Speaker, we are going to put some attention on spring-
cleaning week.
  We have got some CPAs in this body. And they are going to be leading 
this effort. At this time, I would like to yield to one of those CPAs, 
Representative Conaway from Texas who is going to be helping to lead 
this effort.
  He has a bill which I will have to tell you, Mr. Speaker, it is just 
one of my favorite bills that has been filed here in this House this 
year. In his legislation, he says that if you want to start a new 
program, you have got to find one to take off the books, one that has 
outlived its usefulness.
  As I have led the effort for our task force on waste, fraud and 
abuse, it has been a joy to work with Mr. Conaway and hear his ideas on 
how we can get Government to develop those best practices and go 
through the process of reducing its size and becoming more efficient 
and more responsive to the taxpayer.
  At this time I yield to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Conaway).

                              {time}  2300

  Mr. CONAWAY. I thank the gentlewoman for the opportunity to talk 
tonight. I thank her for hosting this time and my other colleagues who 
have spoken.
  Let me set the framework for why it is important that we are doing 
what we are doing. I have six grandchildren and a seventh one on the 
way. And you look at a CBO study, a Congressional Budget Office study, 
you look at an Office of Management and Budget study, you look at the 
GAO, Government Accountability Office study, every single one of those 
studies shows a pretty frightening picture for the next 50 years.
  My oldest grandson will be, in 2050, 45 years from now, he will be 
where we are. It will be his responsibility and his world to live, kind 
of where we are right now. And if you believe these three sets of 
estimates, which they are very credible, it would show that left 
unchecked this Federal Government

[[Page 9833]]

will consume half the gross domestic product of this country.
  There has never been a free market enterprise anywhere in history 
where the central government can take half and you and I can take the 
other half and continue to prosper, continue to grow, continue to have 
a standard of living that grows with the other half. It just does not 
work.
  We are currently at about 20 percent of GDP, and in my way of 
thinking, that is the gag threshold. We are about where we can be and 
still maintain healthy opportunities for the rest of the world. I want 
those opportunities for my grandchildren. It is incumbent upon us. We 
received those from our parents and grandparents, and I think to do 
anything less is particularly unworthy of us.
  David Walker who heads up the GAO told us this morning in a meeting 
that the financial statements of the Federal Government this year will 
show unfunded liabilities of some $50 trillion. That is a combination 
of hard debt that gets talked a lot about in this body with Treasury 
bills and notes and a few bonds that are out there and the debt that is 
owed to Social Security. But the unfunded promises to Social Security, 
the unfunded promises to Medicare and Medicaid, the various unfunded 
responsibilities that we add up, add to constantly in this body, 
represent about $50 trillion. And that is a staggering amount of money.
  We are going to have to hit this on a lot of fronts in order to 
adjust our way of doing things and to trim this growth in this Federal 
Government. It is going to require some budgetary reform: things like 
sunset review process; things like line item veto or enhanced 
rescission powers for the President. That will be helpful. We also have 
to address the automatic programs, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. 
Those programs continue to grow automatically every year unless we do 
something, take some positive action.
  We took a little bit of positive action last year with the Deficit 
Reduction Act in which we trimmed about $37 billion out of that growth. 
It was a Herculean effort. If you listen to the rhetoric on both sides, 
quite frankly we bragged a little bit too much and in contrast the 
other side screamed and hollered and predicted gloom and doom way too 
much because that $36 billion if you look at the growth rates and you 
put it on a line chart, you could barely distinguish the before and 
after lines on that chart. It was $36 billion, and we bragged about it; 
but it was a very modest, at best, attempt at doing what we all 
collectively know that we have got to do, to make some hard choices.
  My bill would help us begin to make priority choices for new 
programs. We do a very terrible job of setting priorities with existing 
spending. Katrina relief versus food stamps. The war fight versus 
whatever. We just don't do that very well. Have a hard time saying no. 
But it seems like we ought to begin to practice saying no or practice 
setting priorities on new programs. And I appreciate you bragging on 
that bill.
  You mentioned spring cleaning. We are also going to start a thing 
called Project Dave. Project Dave comes from the movie ``Dave'' in 
which a surrogate President is brought in because the President has had 
some sort of stroke of some sort and he is a look alike, somebody who 
looks exactly like the President. He comes in and he is a rookie. He 
does not know all the things that you cannot do in the Federal 
Government. And he begins to kind of grow into his job. He is in a 
budget meeting or hearing and he brings some commonsense kind of 
background to the table and begins to whack programs. Of course the 
bureaucrats, the executive branch folks are saying, you cannot do that. 
He said, why not? I am the President. So he begins to cut spending all 
over the place.
  So we have got a list, the President has given us a list of about 150 
programs that he wants to see cut that have out lived their usefulness. 
One of them that comes to mind is the job bank that the Labor 
Department continues to run, an Internet job bank. We spend about $15 
million a year on maintaining an Internet job bank. Anybody who has 
looked for a job knows that there are huge resources, private sector 
resources for there for Internet job banks. Why would we continue to 
run one ourselves?
  Let's take that $15 million and leave it with the taxpayers or reduce 
the deficit. All the kinds of good things that will happen.
  I am looking forward to working with the gentlewoman in this spring 
cleaning that ought to go about helping to shine some spotlights on 
things that we should not be doing, things that really are not the role 
of this Federal Government. It is going to be difficult, as I mentioned 
how hard it was to pass the Deficit Reduction Act, but that is the kind 
of hard work this Republican group can do.
  Let me finish off by saying that I am not a doom and gloom person. 
The glass is always half full. I drive my staff and family crazy 
because I am so optimistic. We can fix these problems. These are not 
beyond us. This is not rocket science. It is straight-up budgeting. If 
you have a revenue problem and a spending problem causing the deficit, 
we are fixing the revenue side. It is just fine. It is percolating 
along just fine.
  We simply have a spending problem. We have to begin to say no. So I 
am very optimistic that this Republican-led House, this Republican-led 
Senate and a President in the White House that we can make major 
strides in addressing this very critical issue. That is not an over-
statement. This body takes over-statement and hyperbole and puffing to 
an art form.
  I tell people that the single greatest threat that we face to our way 
of life is not al Qaeda. It is not the terrorists. They will not change 
our way of life. They may hurt some of us. But we will get them in the 
end. The single biggest threat to our way of life, to my 
grandchildren's way of life, is the growth in Federal Government, the 
growth in spending. That does have the capacity to change our way of 
life. And it will take some tough decisions on our part to get this 
done, and we owe it to my grandkids and your grandchildren if you have 
them to get that work done.
  I appreciate being able to pitch in on this tonight.
  Mrs. BLACKBURN. I thank the gentleman from Texas for his wisdom and 
expertise and he is so right. We are doing this and we are taking these 
steps. And you know, as the gentleman said, there are going to be some 
things that are not rocket science. It is just that, you know, it is 
like Ronald Reagan said, when you have a Federal Government program, 
there is nothing so close to eternal life on Earth as a Federal 
Government program. And it is very difficult to get those programs cut 
down, but we are up to this task. We have been working on this. We are 
ready to move full steam ahead. And we want to invite the American 
people to work with us when they know where there is waste, fraud, and 
abuse where we should be rooting something out. They should contact us, 
talk to us, let us know what their suggestions are.
  This is going to be not those glamorous big front-page bills that you 
see passed. This is working on the process of government. This is 
working on the operations of government. It is time for us to roll our 
sleeves up and get to work. And we are looking forward to our summer of 
spring cleaning and working on making certain that people are aware 
where programs have out-lived their usefulness, where there are 
redundancies.
  We have 342 different economic programs in this country in this 
Federal Government, and it is time to begin to streamline that, so that 
our local governments do a better job of utilizing those resources. And 
we are doing this, addressing all the programs, addressing our 
entitlement spending because we want to be certain that America stays 
free.
  We are trustees of a wonderful, wonderful legacy. It is a legacy of 
sacrifice. It is a legacy of service. It is a legacy that the men and 
women in uniform have fought for and the freedom in this Nation is 
worth preserving. And we are looking forward to beginning to work on 
those processes of government and reducing the size of the Federal 
Government.

[[Page 9834]]

  I want to turn our attention this evening now back toward the 
immigration issue where we began our conversation, and spend a little 
bit of time as we focus this and the concern that this body has, 
because of our love for this Nation, because of our respect for the men 
and women who are fighting to keep us free, because of our concern for 
what we see happening on our southern border and, yes, on our northern 
border too, and because of what we know takes place every day with 
illegal entry as individuals break the law, as they enter this country.
  Mr. Speaker, you know, it is so interesting, there are laws on the 
books for prosecution, for penalty, for those that illegally enter your 
car, your home, your business, and your country. And how interesting, 
how interesting that we are choosing to say to those that illegally 
enter the country, we are going to consider to let you stay. How very 
interesting that we have some that support that.
  As I said earlier, amnesty is something I do not support. I have 
never supported it, and I continue to stand solidly against it. I have 
two of my colleagues with me for this discussion, the gentleman from 
Texas (Mr. Carter) and the gentleman from California (Mr. Rohrabacher); 
and I am going to yield to the gentleman from Texas Mr. Carter for a 
couple of more comments on immigration and then, Mr. Speaker, I will 
yield the balance of the time to Mr. Rohrabacher from California.
  The gentleman from Texas.
  Mr. CARTER. Mr. Speaker, we have an old saying around the courthouse, 
the definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing and expect 
different results. We have tried a bill just like the one that the 
Senate sent over to us. It is headed our way that they just passed back 
in 1986. And President Reagan, a man who never lacked in the courage to 
speak the truth, called it what it was, an amnesty bill. That amnesty 
bill resulted in 15 million additional illegal immigrants coming into 
the United States. It was a plum that said, come on up here, boys, the 
water is fine.
  Now, why in the world would we ever think that the same exact program 
would bring any different results? I join my colleagues, both of my 
colleagues here in totally opposing amnesty. Amnesty is not a solution 
to this problem. It is the problem. I take the position and I think 
most of the Members of this House take the position as I mentioned that 
we have got to stop the bleeding at the American border.
  The other night I went into detail about the criminal activity that 
is going on on our southern border. I am sure we got problems on our 
northern border too, but I only live about 130 miles from our southern 
border so I have firsthand knowledge of what is going on on the 
southern border.
  I have visited that border. I have seen the drug dealers that are 
crossing in waves, bringing evil that I spent 20 years on the bench 
fighting. The biggest drug pipeline in the world runs up I-35 right 
through the middle of my district. I have seen the night vision 
pictures of troops of drug dealers hauling large satchels of illegal 
substances across our southern border. These are not folks coming over 
here for work. These are folks coming over here for evil.
  We have got to secure that southern border and all of our borders. If 
we cannot protect our own sovereignty, Mr. Speaker, we are having a 
hard time arguing we are a sovereign Nation. So our sovereignty is 
important enough for us to take our time and plug the hole and make our 
life safe for the American citizens. And then my position is at that 
point in time these other issues that we are discussing is, address 
them sensibly, take the time to examine all the options and fix all 
that is broken in our immigration policy from top to bottom; and 
believe me, Mr. Speaker, in my district, background checks on people 
wanting to come into this country legally, we are now working on those 
backgrounds checks from 1999 and 2000.
  We are going to have a real interesting crisis when we dump 15 
million people into a background check program. That is just one of the 
little things we need to take our time and figure out.
  So I am going to join, I guess the colloquy with my friends here and 
we will talk about all of this. Mr. Rohrabacher, I have heard him. He 
is passionate on this subject, and I am looking forward to his passion. 
But most importantly the thing we want to say is to the American 
people, we haven't forgotten you. We hear you. We hear you.
  I just got off the phone less than an hour ago to one of my folks 
back in Williamson County and the other counties I have in the 31st 
Congressional District of Texas.

                              {time}  2315

  They are united like a solid front for border security only. Our 
people that live on the battle line know where the battle is.
  One individual, out of his own pocket, has sent out the phone number 
of every senator in the United States Senate to every voter in my 
district, paid for it himself, just to tell them to call the Senate and 
tell them what they thought of the Senate bill. That is passion for 
this war that we are fighting to protect the sovereignty of our Nation.
  So, as we are getting passionate, we are passionate because the 
people are passionate, and I am just glad to be able to step up here 
with my colleagues and tell you that we have not forgotten you. We know 
the American citizens' concern is from Maine to California, from Texas 
to Minnesota. You have told us, we listen.
  Mrs. BLACKBURN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Texas, and we 
always have such interesting conversations because within my 7th 
District of Tennessee I have Williamson County, Tennessee, and it is so 
interesting because my constituents, whether they are in Shelby County 
or Chester County or Henderson County or Montgomery County or 
Williamson County, they are saying secure the border first, secure the 
border; no amnesty at all whatsoever in any way, shape or form.
  Mr. CARTER. Exactly.
  Mrs. BLACKBURN. Enforcement must be dealt with, and employer 
responsibilities must be addressed, but the first thing first and 
foremost is securing that border.
  What I hear from them is, let us do it right the first time, let us 
go in here and let us do this right.
  Mr. Speaker, I love the fact that my constituents love this country 
and really take seriously the responsibility of protecting this 
country, of embracing the freedoms and the opportunity that this 
country holds. That is a blessing in my life, and I am so grateful that 
they have that love of this country.

                          ____________________