[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 152 (2006), Part 6]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages 7869-7870]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




         H.R. 4681, THE PALESTINIAN ANTI-TERRORISM ACT OF 2006

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. JIM McDERMOTT

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 10, 2006

  Mr. McDERMOTT. Mr. Speaker, it is not very often that Jim McDermott 
rises to support this President, but that is precisely what I am doing 
now. The President does not want his hands tied by H.R. 4681. I 
completely agree. It was taken off the calendar today, and it ought to 
stay off the calendar.
  H.R. 4681, the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006, will not make 
Israel safer, will not meet the urgent humanitarian needs of the 
Palestinian people, and will not give our diplomats the tools they need 
to help find a path to peace in the Mideast.
  For all of these reasons, I oppose it, and I urge my colleagues to 
reconsider. I believe in diplomacy as a means to correct injustice 
around the world. I believe gifted diplomats can accomplish as much 
with words and deeds as the military can with guns and soldiers.
  There is no question that the United States must take all appropriate 
steps to ensure that terrorists like Hamas are denied access to our 
financial aid. Hamas is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of 
innocent Israelis before coming to power.
  Since then, they have neither renounced violence nor recognized 
Israel. This is unacceptable.
  By all means, we must deny Hamas dollars that would buy hatred, but 
we must remember that Hamas and the Palestinian people are not one and 
the same.
  Even as we deny any and all assistance to Hamas, we must not hurt 
those Palestinians who are working for peace. If we fail to support 
them, I have no doubt that Israel will pay the ultimate price: more 
instability in the West Bank and Gaza, more desperation, and more 
terrorism.
  America's leadership is on the line in the Middle East, and more 
instability is something we need to avoid. We still have 130,000 
American soldiers in harm's way in Iraq; we can't afford to make any 
more poor choices related to that region. But, that's what we will do 
if we pass this bill.
  It doesn't make sense for the United States to limit political and 
economic aid to moderates, like Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud 
Abbas.
  He and others have met our requirements by recognizing Israel, 
renouncing violence and terrorism against Israel, and accepting all 
previously signed Israeli-Palestinian agreements. What happens if we 
turn our back on leaders trying to heal a millennium of hate?
  And what can we expect if we turn our backs on the real and growing 
humanitarian needs of the Palestinian people? It doesn't make sense to 
put restrictions on funding the NGOs that provide the Palestinian 
people with hospitals and schools.
  As a medical doctor, I am gravely concerned about the fate of 
millions of innocent Palestinians who rely on international aid for 
food, health care, and for developing their economy and businesses.
  Recent news reports say that international sanctions are preventing 
hospitals in Gaza from providing dialysis machines for patients, and 
they may not be able to supply immunizations to children.
  The World Health Organization sees a ``rapid decline of the public 
health system . . . towards a possible collapse.'' This bill will only 
make the already dire situation even worse. As a doctor I took an oath 
to heal. As a nation, we took an oath to lead.

[[Page 7870]]

  Allowing innocent Palestinians to go hungry, while denying them 
medical treatment cannot possibly correct injustice, or lead to peace.
  Passing this bill will be seen as anti-Palestinian, and the resulting 
chaos and animosity can only threaten the relative calm that Israel has 
seen in recent months.
  Many of the Israeli leaders I've spoken to, think this bill goes too 
far by punishing all Palestinians, not just Hamas. They understand that 
a radicalized population will show more support for Hamas, not less.
  During a recent trip to Israel and the Palestinian territories, I saw 
how both sides deeply yearn for peace. And I saw firsthand how they 
need the United States to do all it can to help them make peace.
  The Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act will make this task enormously 
difficult.
  The harsh restrictions, and cutting off contacts with moderate 
Palestinians, will severely complicate our ability to assume an active 
role in helping both sides resolve the conflict.
  If we cannot engage with moderates, and those trying to develop the 
Palestinian economy and build civil society, we forfeit our ability to 
nurture and strengthen the positive elements in Palestine.
  The President and State Department must have the utmost flexibility 
to help moderate Palestinians, to quickly get economic and humanitarian 
aid to places that need it, like hospitals and health clinics, and 
helps prevent the resumption of terrorism.
  We need to isolate and weaken Hamas, and hopefully their tenure at 
the head of the PA will be a short one. But if we cannot distinguish 
between Hamas and the majority of the Palestinian people, we cannot 
possibly expect to have a role in creating what comes next.
  Israelis and Palestinians realize that in the end, their fates are 
tied. It's time to help the majorities on both sides reach their mutual 
goal--a peaceful two-state solution--rather than standing in the way by 
punishing one side.
  While the bill has been pulled from the calendar, that's only 
temporary. I urge the majority to leave it off the table indefinitely.
  Give our State Department an opportunity to nurture peace, or we will 
surely have to ask our military to counter more terrorism.

                          ____________________