[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 152 (2006), Part 5]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages 5783-5784]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




          INTRODUCTION OF BILL TO AMEND THE INDIAN GAMING ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                             HON. JIM COSTA

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, April 6, 2006

  Mr. COSTA. Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce this proposed legislation 
to require States to implement commonsense planning policy as it 
relates to the Class III Indian gaming within State borders.
  Too often, Indian tribes are at the mercy of the shifting political 
winds of State government. Negotiating a Tribal-State compact for the 
right to engage in Class III gaming on their tribal lands is a process 
complicated by elections, changing attitudes towards the tribe, as well 
as an understanding that tribal gaming can be a lucrative business for 
the State. This process is frequently understood as ``let's make a 
deal'' time.
  This proposed legislation directs the Secretary of the Interior to 
withhold approval of a Tribal-State compact until the State first 
develops a long-term plan to administer Class III gaming within its 
State boundaries. It employs

[[Page 5784]]

a process to incorporate opinion by both the local communities and 
tribes, and represents a process often recognized by State and Federal 
Government as necessary but missing from the present application 
process for Class III gaming. This legislation will not prevent tribes 
from engaging in the application process or affect already approved 
Tribal-State compacts.

                          ____________________