[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 152 (2006), Part 2]
[House]
[Page 1951]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                           OUR NEW 51ST STATE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Norwood) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. NORWOOD. Mr. Speaker, there was a very subtle illegal guestworker 
plan stuck in the budget the administration just submitted to Congress. 
That budget calls for the United States to allow over one million new 
illegal immigrants to infiltrate our borders during 2007.
  As a matter of fact, last year's budget is allowing one million 
illegal aliens to enter this year as well. That is how many immigrants 
enter our country illegally each year under our current enforcement 
plans.
  We know it will happen because it happens every year under current 
enforcement policy; and we are going right ahead with the same old 
plan, knowing in advance that it will be a near total failure.
  We continue talking about how we are adding 1,500 new border agents 
in 2007. That won't be in the field until 2009, letting another two 
million illegal aliens to walk across our border.
  We talk about how we are adding technology and fencing, but that 
won't be ready until 2010, allowing another million illegals in our 
country.
  Right now, with our current budget and reform plans, we are, by 
default, agreeing to allow an additional four million illegal aliens 
into our country. That is equivalent to the population of South 
Carolina or Oregon.
  Think about that. We are being asked to add a 51st state populated 
entirely by low-income illegal aliens.
  Mr. Speaker, I cannot find an excuse for this. We know right now how 
to bring this flood of illegal immigration to a virtual halt, and I 
think within the next 2 weeks. We need somewhere between 36 and 48,000 
troops immediately deployed to the southern border.
  Now, the Minuteman Project in April showed that with between 18 and 
24 additional enforcement personnel per mile, we can effectively secure 
our border for the first time. And it was not just the Minuteman 
Project that revealed these statistics. The U.S. Border Patrol 
conducted similar demonstration projects in 1993. Operation Blockade in 
El Paso and Operation Gatekeeper in San Diego produced the identical 
same results.
  We have a good idea on how much a deployment like this would cost. 
$2.5 billion a year. But, you know what? That is less than 4 percent of 
the minimum $70 billion a year we are currently spending covering the 
health care, education and the different costs for illegal immigrants.
  We already know how long it would take to get these troops on line 
and end this nightmare. One week. That is how long it took NORTHCOM to 
place 70,000 National Guard and regular Army troops on the Gulf Coast 
in response to Katrina, and we are still railing about how that took 
too long. One week.
  If the burden of the National Guard is too heavy, we can ask our 
governors to loan the Nation's 15,000 State defense forces to help. We 
can call up the Coast Guard Auxiliary and the U.S. Air Force Civil Air 
Patrol.
  We have laws in place, thanks to changes we made in the 108th 
Congress. Title 32, Section 9, U.S. Code now allows our governors to 
call out their National Guard for homeland security missions such as 
this at 100 percent Federal expense.

                              {time}  1215

  Governor Janet Napolitano of Arizona has supposedly made such a call 
on the Department of Defense. Her State legislature voted earlier this 
week to force her to follow up on that request.
  Mr. Speaker, we need every Member of the House to urge their Governor 
to deploy all necessary forces to combat this invasion. We need the 
President to order the Department of Defense to fund this mission at 
100 percent, and we need new legislation forcing the issue if action is 
not forthcoming. We can solve this problem if only Congress has the 
will.

                          ____________________