[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 152 (2006), Part 13]
[House]
[Pages 17371-17373]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                          LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM

  (Mr. HOYER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, I rise for the purpose of inquiring of the 
majority leader the schedule for the week to come, and I yield to my 
friend, Mr. Boehner, the majority leader.
  Mr. BOEHNER. I want to thank my colleague from Maryland for yielding.
  Mr. Speaker, next week the House will convene on Tuesday at 12:30 for 
morning hour and 2 p.m. for legislative business.
  We will consider a number of measures under the suspension of the 
rules next Tuesday. We expect to have a final list of those measures to 
Members' offices by tomorrow afternoon.
  For the balance of the week, the House will consider on Wednesday the 
5-year anniversary of 9/11, and we will have a resolution on the floor, 
and we will also begin consideration of H.R. 2965, the Federal Prison 
Industries Competition in Contracting Act.
  On Thursday and Friday, we will complete consideration of the Federal 
Prison Industries bill, and we will consider a House resolution 
amending the House rules on earmark reform. I would also note that 
conference reports may be brought up at any time, and hope to see H.R. 
5122, the Sonny Montgomery National Defense Authorization Act for 
fiscal year 2007 conference report and I hope to see it passed next 
week. At this point, Members should anticipate that we will have votes 
on Friday.
  I also have an announcement in terms of the schedule. Members have a 
schedule through September. It is expected that the House will not be 
back in session until the week of November 13. I do want Members to 
know that the House will be in session that week. I expect we will have 
votes on Monday the 13th and through that week. Anything further on the 
schedule beyond that time, I wish I could tell Members, but I don't 
know.
  Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentleman for bringing us up to date.
  Am I to take it that when the gentleman indicated that the 29th would 
be the last day prior to the election, Members can still rely on that 
representation?
  Mr. BOEHNER. That is correct.
  Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentleman for that comment because there has 
been some discussion there may be another week, and we are glad to 
advise Members.
  Mr. BOEHNER. Somebody else was having those discussions with 
themselves, not with me.
  Mr. HOYER. That happens, I have noticed.
  With respect to the schedule that you have just announced, would it 
be fair to conclude that if we do not have additional conference 
reports, and you indicate that you will take conference reports if they 
are available, which I understand, but if there were not additional 
conference reports beyond those which you have referenced in your 
announcement, that the probability of Friday is not as great as it 
otherwise would be? What I am saying, before you respond, is 
essentially it would appear to me that based upon what has been 
noticed, that that work would probably be accomplished within the 
Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday period.
  Mr. BOEHNER. If the gentleman will yield, it is possible that the 
House could complete its work by Thursday night. It is possible. But I 
don't want to mislead Members. At this point, I believe that Members 
should expect votes on Friday. If it becomes clear during the week that 
we will be able to complete our work, I will give Members as much 
notice as possible. But I don't want to promise something that we can't 
deliver.
  Mr. HOYER. I understand.
  On the following Friday, the 22nd, as the gentleman knows, Rosh 
Hashanah begins at sundown on that day. That is the first day of Rosh 
Hashanah. One of the problems, as you know, that we have is Members 
getting back to the West Coast in time to observe Rosh Hashanah 
appropriately. Friday the 22nd is currently on the schedule. Can you 
comment on that?
  Mr. BOEHNER. I will work with you to accommodate our Members who want 
to observe this religious holiday. I do understand the problem for 
Members on the West Coast. We will work with you to come to some 
resolution. We don't want to put any Members in a difficult travel 
position when it comes to observance of their religious holidays.
  Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentleman for that, and we look forward to 
discussing that with you.
  You note in the announcement of the 9/11 resolution, and I was asked 
by the press, were we going to do something on issues that appear to be 
partisan, and I said no. On September 11th, we will not be here; we 
will be in our home districts, and it should be a day of remembrance 
and resolve; remembrance of the heroism of that day and remembrance of 
the loss of life on that day, and resolve to defeat terrorism and to 
defeat those who would put our country at risk and put our people in 
harm's way and at risk. I believe we are united on that.
  I just saw the resolution, and I have not had a chance to read the 
resolution, nor as I understand it have we worked with your side on the 
resolution.
  Mr. Leader, I would hope perhaps we could come together before the 
resolution is finally introduced. We passed last year's resolution with 
over 400 votes, very few ``no'' votes. I ask if we could work on this 
together to ensure that we have that kind of unanimity which I think is 
appropriate and would help to bring us together.
  Mr. BOEHNER. I have not had a chance to read the resolution either, 
and you have not read the resolution. All I do know is that both 
Democrats and Republicans have worked closely together to develop the 
resolution. Again, I will be happy to take a look at it. And I would 
suggest to the gentleman, if you have any suggestions or concerns, let 
me know.

                              {time}  1530

  Mr. HOYER. I thank the leader for that. And I did not know whether 
our Democrats had worked with people on your side of the aisle. If that 
is the case, then when I read the resolution, I am sure I will be 
pleased. But if there are questions, I will bring them to the attention 
of the leader.

[[Page 17372]]

  Mr. Leader, of course we have next week's schedule. Next week's 
schedule does not include the only appropriation bill that we have not 
yet passed. As you know, we have passed 10 out of the 11 appropriations 
bills. The Labor-Health bill was passed through the House 
Appropriations Committee and ready to report in June. So it has now 
been pending for approximately 60, 75 days.
  Do you have any expectation that the Labor-Health bill will be 
brought to the floor within the foreseeable future?
  I yield to my friend.
  Mr. BOEHNER. The issue is under discussion. As the gentleman knows, 
there are a number of issues in that bill that have caused concern 
amongst Members. And while one of those appears to have been resolved, 
there are a number of other issues remaining there. There have been 
several discussions this week and I think there will be several more 
discussions next week about how to deal with that particular bill.
  Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentleman for that observation. He refers to 
one or two of the issues in the bill. Obviously, one of the issues is 
the so-called Hoyer amendment, the Miller bill, which raises the 
minimum wage. We would hope that that would be brought to the floor. As 
you well know, we considered it with another bill. A number of items 
included in it. It went to the Senate. It didn't pass. We believe that 
the 6.6 million people on the minimum wage are hopeful that we will act 
before we leave here for the election.
  I am very hopeful and I know our side is very hopeful that we could 
bring that bill to the floor with that amendment protected, voted up or 
down. If the Members think that we ought not to do it, fine. If the 
Members think we ought to do it, fine. And pass that bill to the Senate 
so we can complete the appropriations process.
  Mr. BOEHNER. I think the gentleman is well aware that in July before 
the House went on its August district work period, the House voted to 
raise the minimum wage, and this bill is pending in the Senate and I am 
hopeful that the Senate will see fit to deal with it.
  Mr. HOYER. Reclaiming my time, Mr. Leader, of course I appreciate 
your reiterating what we did and we all understand what we did. There 
are different perspectives on what we did. But I would reiterate this 
side's strong desire and hope that we would consider the issue of 
minimum wage on its own merits, as was done in the committee. As you 
know, it was passed in a bipartisan fashion in committee with one-
fourth, I think, or maybe one-fifth of the Republicans in the committee 
voting for it.
  Mr. BOEHNER. Will the gentleman yield?
  Mr. HOYER. I would be glad to yield to my friend.
  Mr. BOEHNER. We have rules in the House about legislating on an 
appropriations bill, and it is clear that the intent of the author was 
to legislate on an appropriations bill. I think the majority did the 
right thing by moving the authorizing language for the minimum wage 
through the Rules Committee and brought it to the House floor.
  So, again, the House has dealt with this. I am hopeful that the 
Senate will deal with it soon
  Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentleman for his comment. I understand what 
the rules are, and both sides have relatively regularly waived those 
rules when it wanted to do something. And if we want to raise the 
minimum wage for our workers, we can do it. That is our perspective. 
But I certainly appreciate the gentleman's further education on what 
the rules require.
  Let me ask you this. It is not on the schedule for next week. Do you 
anticipate any additional legislation prior to the 29th of September 
which would further implement the recommendations of the 9/11 
Commission? As you know, there are some 19 recommendations which 
Governor Kean and Congressman Hamilton have observed we have not acted 
on. Can you tell us whether there is any anticipation of scheduling 
action on those issues?
  I yield to my friend.
  Mr. BOEHNER. Over a year ago, the House worked to implement the 
recommendations of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission. And I believe that 
Members on both sides of the Capitol, on both sides of the aisle, 
decided to accept those recommendations that we thought would be 
helpful. Not all of the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission have, in 
fact, been adopted because, as I understand it, Members on both sides 
of the aisle and on both sides of the Capitol have rejected some of the 
ideas that they put forth.
  As we all know, some of these independent commissions get 
established. They can make recommendations, but the real decisions 
about what we should enact into law should be left to the Members, and 
I think the Members have made their decisions very clear.
  Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentleman for his observations, while I think 
we disagree on the substance of the reports and the merits of the 
recommendations that have not yet been passed. I know on our side, Mr. 
Thompson, who is our ranking member on the Homeland Security Committee, 
and others are very hopeful that we can move forward on those. But I 
understand what the gentleman has said.
  I will not ask the gentleman further questions. But, Mr. Speaker, 
under my reservation I would say that we on this side of the aisle are 
very hopeful that we can consider legislation before we break on the 
29th of September which would give the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services the authority to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for 
our seniors. We would hope that we would see legislation which would 
restore the deep cuts in college tuition assistance that were included 
in the deficit reduction bill that we passed some months ago and that 
we would reconsider the tax cuts that we gave, deep tax cuts, that we 
gave to oil companies apparently to spur further investment in 
exploration for new sources of oil. A worthy objective. But I think, 
happily or unhappily, depending upon your perspective, whether you are 
an oil company or whether you are a driver of automobiles and have to 
pay the gasoline prices, the companies are making great profits and 
could have great incentive because of those great profits to develop 
further sources of energy.
  I would conclude by saying that we would hope the majority would 
seriously consider bringing to the floor all of those issues prior to 
the 29th.
  Mr. BOEHNER. Will the gentleman yield?
  Mr. HOYER. I yield to my friend, the majority leader.
  Mr. BOEHNER. Just so the gentleman understands, and I appreciate his 
yielding, I am happy to come here and have this colloquy with you about 
what is going to be on the floor and give you as much information as I 
can.
  Now, I see that my friend from Maryland today has decided to employ a 
new tactic in bringing campaign themes to the floor during the 
colloquy. Now, I would be happy to engage in those, but it is not what 
the colloquy is for. And so I would be happy to engage the gentleman.
  The Medicare drug bill has produced premiums for seniors far below, 
far below, any number that anyone ever expected. And what got us those 
low drug premium prices was the competition that was created in the 
creation of the program.
  Secondly, when it comes to the college loan program that the 
gentleman referred to that there were cuts, if the gentleman would look 
at the bill, he will realize that we widened the ability of more 
students to get to college under this program than we have ever had. 
The fact is there are higher numbers for grant programs, higher numbers 
for what you can borrow from the program, and it could not be working 
any better. And as a result, the Deficit Reduction Act that we passed 
last year did, in fact, save $12.5 billion that came out of the hides 
of the lenders who were involved in the program.
  So, again, I would be happy to engage you in this conversation, but 
we could probably do it under a Special Order rather than during the 
colloquy.
  Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, reclaiming my time, I thank the gentleman for 
his

[[Page 17373]]

observations, and perhaps I will take him up on that offer. That might 
be instructive for both of us and perhaps for the American people as 
well. I understand the gentleman's perspective. We differ. That is not 
surprising, I am sure, to the viewers.
  But I will say this, Mr. Leader, if I can, that this is about 
discussing the schedule. We have a very short time frame. We have 14 
days left that are scheduled in this session before the election, and 
we are coming back for a lame duck session. I understand that. But I 
was simply inquiring of you whether or not those matters which we 
believe are important might be on the schedule. I am not debating their 
merits or demerits at this point in time. I can do that and, as a 
matter of fact, look forward to discussing that in a Special Order with 
you. But we do believe it was in the realm of a discussion about what 
might be scheduled.
  And I yield to my friend.
  Mr. BOEHNER. I thank my colleague. And while we may differ on whether 
the glass is half full or half empty, I do have great respect for my 
colleague from Maryland.
  Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentleman

                          ____________________