[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 151 (2005), Part 4]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages 5705-5706]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




THE INTRODUCTION OF THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES WITH DISABILITIES PROTECTION 
                                  ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                         HON. CHRIS VAN HOLLEN

                              of maryland

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, April 5, 2005

  Mr. VAN HOLLEN. Mr. Speaker, I am proud today to introduce the 
Federal Employees with Disabilities Protection Act.
  The Federal Employees with Disabilities Protection Act (FEDPA) simply 
states that in cases where federal jobs are contracted out, a federal 
employee should not lose his or her job if that employee is an 
individual with a significant physical or developmental disability and 
had been hired under a program designed for individuals with such 
disabilities.
  The FEDPA was drafted to respond to a particular situation that 
occurred at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. In 
the fall of 2003 I visited the Hospital, which has developed an 
innovative and successful program hiring developmentally disabled 
individuals from our local community to work in its kitchen and 
cafeteria. Many of these individuals have worked there for more than 
twenty years. They are hard-working, reliable, and beloved by the naval 
officers and staff. I was shocked to learn that the Administration had 
selected these positions to be subject to competitive sourcing. In 
other words, these hard-working disabled employees, who had been hired 
under a federal program designed specifically to hire the severely 
disabled, would be forced to compete for their own jobs against people 
who were not disabled, leaving them on the verge of losing their jobs. 
I wrote the President about this injustice and am pleased that as a 
result of our timely intervention, plans to compete these jobs have 
been withdrawn and these individuals have been able to keep their jobs 
and the sense of dignity that comes with them.
  But it is unconscionable that other severely disabled federal workers 
might have to suffer through the same thing. The FEDPA will protect 
federal employees with severe disabilities from losing their federal 
jobs as a result of contracting out. The bill does allow for jobs to 
continue to be contracted out to organizations like NISH (formerly 
known as the National Institute for the Severely Handicapped) and the 
National Industries for the Blind covered under the Javits-Wagner-O'Day 
Act (JWOD). JWOD established specific programs to hire the severely 
disabled; it is not the intention of the FEDPA to interfere with JWOD.
  The FEDPA is supported by many advocates for the disabled, including 
ANCOR (The American Network of Community Options and Resources), The 
Public Policy Collaboration of United Cerebral Palsy and the Arc of the 
United States. Federal employee unions supporting FEDPA include the 
National Association of Government Employees (NAGE) and the Service 
Employees International Union (SEIU). The FEDPA also has the support of 
the Professional Services Council, one of the principal organizations 
representing government contractors, because they agree that supporting 
employment opportunities for the disabled is important.
  Mr. Speaker, I believe that everyone in this body wants to protect 
employment opportunities for the severely disabled. I urge my 
colleagues to support and cosponsor the Federal Employees with 
Disabilities Protection Act.
  I am submitting for the Record an article that was published by The 
Washington Post on October 14, 2003 that describes the situation 
involving the scullery workers at the National Naval Medical Center.

               [From the Washington Post, Oct. 14, 2003]

        In Bethesda, Hiring Policy, `Competitive Sourcing' Clash


       Naval Medical Center Considers Replacing Disabled Workers

                          (By Christopher Lee)

       President Bush's efforts to make government run more like a 
     business collided this month with the reality that, in many 
     ways, government is not a business.
       For the 2 two years, the Navy, as part of the Bush 
     administration's initiative, has been studying whether a 
     private contractor should take over the custodial and food 
     services provided by 21 federal employees at the National 
     Naval Medical Center in Bethesda.
       It is just one small example of Bush's ``competitive 
     sourcing'' initiative, which requires hundreds of thousands 
     of civil servants across the government to prove they can do 
     their work better and more cheaply than a private contractor, 
     or risk seeing the work outsourced.
       But in one important way the 21 workers in the hospital 
     scullery are different: All are mentally retarded, 
     beneficiaries of federal policies that promote the employment 
     of people with disabilities.
       To their supporters, the administration's requirement that 
     they compete for their jobs misses the point that government 
     employment has always been about more than the bottom line. 
     Through various policies and laws, federal agencies for 
     decades have gone out of their way to hire members of certain 
     populations, from veterans to disabled people to welfare 
     mothers and students.
       ``There are different goals of the federal government, and 
     one of those goals is to get different people into real 
     jobs,'' said Representative Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who met 
     last month with the scullery workers at the hospital, which 
     is in his district. ``And this [policy] will undercut that 
     goal.''
       Bush has strongly defended ``competitive sourcing,'' 
     calling it one of his most important management initiatives. 
     He says forcing government workers to compete with

[[Page 5706]]

     private contractors for their jobs promotes government 
     efficiency and saves taxpayer dollars--even if the jobs stay 
     in-house. An Oct. 3 report by the Office of Management and 
     Budget said federal agencies have identified 434,820 jobs 
     that are ripe for such competition, of which 103,412 are 
     being evaluated for possible contracting out.
       ``We are confident that the savings and service benefits 
     expected from this effort will soon follow,'' Clay Johnson 
     III, OMB's deputy director for management, said that day.
       That provides scant comfort to employees such as Devorah 
     Shapiro, 30, who has worked at the hospital scullery for 10 
     years and worries what will happen if she loses her job.
       ``I like working here,'' Shapiro said the other day while 
     taking a break from the first half of her eight-hour shift. 
     ``I work on the belt. I help push carts upstairs sometimes. I 
     wash plates, pick silverware--I do everything.''
       Shapiro landed the job after interning at the hospital 
     while a student at Rock Terrace School, a public campus in 
     Rockville that serves 112 special-needs children in grades 6 
     through 12. ``I live in a group home and I have to pay the 
     rent there,'' said Shapiro, her dark curls tucked neatly 
     under a hairnet. ``And I have to work, or else they'll ask me 
     to leave. I don't want to leave my friends. I don't want to 
     leave my house. It's too nice.''
       The work isn't easy. The employees, clad in blue uniforms 
     and white plastic aprons, remove trash and utensils from used 
     trays as they navigate across a water-slicked red tile floor. 
     Many wear earplugs to block out the drone of the industrial 
     dishwasher that cleans the dishes and trays that pass through 
     it on a conveyer belt before the workers retrieve and stack 
     them in neat piles. Shifts begin at 5:30 a.m. and finish as 
     late as 7 p.m.
       James Eastridge, 38, another former Rock Terrace student, 
     has worked in the kitchen for 22 years. That is long enough 
     for him to earn several promotions and enough money to buy a 
     house in Hagerstown, where he lives with his parents.
       ``I started out when I was 16 years old and just kept on 
     working; the years just flew by,'' he said. ``I hope we get 
     to keep the jobs. When I was in school, I was pretty wild. 
     They got me in the job . . . and I've been doing good ever 
     since I've been here.''
       Randy Severt, a teacher at Rock Terrace, said more than 300 
     students have interned or worked at the hospital since the 
     school formed a partnership with the institution in 1979. The 
     Navy got reliable, long-serving employees for hard-to-fill 
     positions. The students, who earn between $9.42 and $12.80 an 
     hour, were given an opportunity to work, learn about money 
     management and become more self-sufficient.
       Providing such opportunities is a long-standing goal of the 
     federal government. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 banned 
     discrimination against disabled people in federal hiring and 
     required agencies to develop affirmative action plans to hire 
     more people with disabilities.
       Most of the scullery workers joined the hospital under a 
     federal hiring authority that allows agencies to take on 
     people with mental retardation as provisional employees, then 
     convert them to permanent status after two years of 
     satisfactory service. The government employed 1,734 mentally 
     retarded workers in 2000, about one-tenth of 1 percent of the 
     1.8 million-strong federal civilian workforce, according to 
     the Office of Personnel Management. (Overall, more than 
     120,000 disabled people worked for the government that year, 
     more than 7 percent of the federal workforce. )
       If the hospital scullery work goes to a private contractor, 
     it will mean a big adjustment for a group of workers who, due 
     to circumstances and disability, do not cope well with 
     change, Severt said.
       ``They have problems finding jobs on their own. They don't 
     advocate well for themselves and they don't have a lot of 
     skills,'' Severt said. ``Some of them can speak well. Some of 
     them have very good social skills. But they are retarded, and 
     they need help every step of the way. They just don't 
     adapt.''
       Hospital officials say the quality of the work isn't at 
     issue. ``They're very loyal employees,'' said Cmdr. Martie 
     Slaughter, the hospital's nutrition manager. ``I've only been 
     here for two years and they are like my family.''
       In similar competitions across the government, the in-house 
     bid has triumphed more than half the time, according to the 
     OMB. Even in the cases where the private sector has won, the 
     employees often have gone to work for the contractor. But the 
     scullery employees are at a decided disadvantage.
       ``If you are special needs, you have a great need for 
     greater supervision,'' Slaughter said. ``And we all know that 
     supervision costs money.''
       Jerry Leener, whose son Mike, 27, has worked at the 
     hospital for eight years, said that even a White House 
     focused on the bottom line should realize there is little to 
     be gained by contracting out the work. Displaced employees 
     would turn to government entitlement programs, including 
     federal disability payments, Medicaid and food stamps.
       ``If our kids lose their jobs, the federal government is 
     still going to have to compensate them,'' Leener said. 
     ``Either way, it's going to be coming out of federal funds. 
     So we haven't had a cost saving as it relates to these kids. 
     What's more, we've displaced them from their passion. They 
     love working here. They love being a part of this.''
       Military officials have been sympathetic but unmoved. 
     Slaughter said that early on in the process she asked about 
     getting a waiver for the workers, but none was forthcoming. 
     Over the last year, parents of some workers have written to 
     Navy officials and members of Congress seeking help, but with 
     no concrete results.
       As recently as two weeks ago, Navy officials said they were 
     still studying the situation. Parents of the workers grew 
     nervous as a December deadline loomed for the hospital to 
     submit its bid to keep the scullery jobs in-house. They were 
     told that a decision on whether a contractor would take over 
     could come as soon as March.
       Then on Oct. 2, 10 days after Van Hollen's visit to the 
     scullery and after inquiries by The Washington Post, Navy 
     officials passed the word internally that they had been 
     directed to temporarily stop working on the job competition. 
     ``The study has not been cancelled, but postponed until 
     further notice,'' an internal e-mail said.
       Parents said they were given a vague explanation that the 
     job competition had gone on longer than current law permits. 
     A provision in the recently passed 2004 Defense 
     Appropriations bill blocks new funding for single-function 
     job competitions that have exceeded 24 months, and 
     multifunction competitions that have exceeded 30 months. Navy 
     officials at the hospital did not respond to two requests for 
     more information about the decision.
       ``I have a suspicion that they were starting to feel 
     political pressure and decided to put it on hold, and that 
     maybe this thing would blow over,'' said Leener, who added 
     that he remains uncertain about whether his son's job is 
     safe. ``We took it as a big victory, believe me, but it's a 
     temporary one.''
       Trent Duffy, an OMB spokesman, said agencies may cancel job 
     competitions that jeopardize protected workers, such as 
     veterans or disabled people. ``It is permissible for agencies 
     to make that determination and cancel a competition because 
     these protected populations, these certain people, could 
     potentially lose their livelihoods,'' Duffy said. ``They 
     absolutely have that discretion under the law.'' Van Hollen, 
     who wrote a letter to Bush urging him to halt the study, said 
     he viewed the Navy's decision as little more than political 
     expediency. He still believes competitive sourcing is ``a 
     one-size-fits-all contracting-out policy that does not take 
     into account other important goals of the federal 
     government,'' he said.
       ``I still think it's an example of their policy run amok,'' 
     Van Hollen said. ``There's no doubt what happened here. You 
     want to applaud the Navy for reversing its decision, but you 
     can't have a member of Congress or a member of the press 
     visit every site where you've got . . . contracting out going 
     on with model programs.''

                          ____________________