[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 151 (2005), Part 2]
[Senate]
[Pages 1799-1800]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                           PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

  Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, yesterday, the Senate got the eye-popping 
news that prescription drug benefits will cost far more than anyone had 
ever anticipated. In fact, the early appraisal was that it would cost 
$400 billion, and then it shot up to over $500 billion. Yesterday, we 
learned that it would cost $720 billion over the next decade, and 
perhaps would even go to $1 trillion. A lot of us in the Senate, 
frankly, were not too surprised because the legislation doesn't allow 
for the use of cost containment strategies that are utilized in the 
private sector.
  To me, it is incomprehensible, for example, that Medicare, with all 
of its bargaining power, wouldn't use the same kind of clout that a 
timber company does in Alaska or Oregon or an auto company in the 
Midwest or any other big purchaser. Under this law as it is constituted 
today, what Medicare does is the equivalent of standing in the price 
club and buying toilet paper one roll at a time. There is absolutely 
nobody in the United States who goes out and purchases that way. What 
Medicare is going to be doing just defies common sense because we all 
know that if you buy more of something, whether in Oregon or in Alaska 
or anywhere else, you say, Let us try to negotiate a better deal. But 
Medicare is not allowed to do that under current circumstances.
  I have come today to say that in addition to the debate about how the 
numbers are crunched, what we ought to be doing is working on a 
bipartisan basis to ensure that we have real cost containment in this 
program that seems to grow in costs almost by the day. I have worked 
with Senator Snowe for more than 3 years on legislation to do that. We 
have introduced it. It has bipartisan support.
  On our side of the aisle, Senator Feinstein and Senator Feingold were 
original sponsors. Senator McCain joined Senator Snowe and me in this 
bipartisan effort. We simply believe that at a time when we are seeing 
so many Government programs cut and reduced and tremendous financial 
pressures for belt tightening, we shouldn't leave seniors without even 
the kind of private sector bargaining, the kind of private sector cost 
containment power that we see in communities all across the country.
  I will tell you, I can't for the life of me figure out why Medicare 
shouldn't have the power to be a smart shopper. As it stands today, 
everybody in the United States tries to be a smart shopper instead of 
Medicare.
  What I would like to do for a couple of moments is try to lay out the 
legislation that Senator Snowe and I have spent so much time working on 
and why I think it is particularly critical right now.
  For a senior who lives in rural America where there may be only one 
private plan serving that area--and maybe there is no private plan at 
all--that senior is likely to be part of what is called the fallback 
plan. As of now, all of those seniors in those small communities, many 
of them in Arkansas--I see our distinguished colleague has joined us; 
like me, she vetted for the law. We would like to see people in 
Arkansas and Oregon, in areas with large, rural populations, have some 
bargaining power the way smart shoppers would. Under the Snowe-Wyden 
legislation, we say that the seniors in those fallback plans could in 
effect be part of a group that could use private sector bargaining 
power in order to hold costs down.
  Many of us also represent the larger cities. I have Portland, but we 
want to hold down costs in Miami, New York, and Chicago. These people 
might have a choice of larger health programs to try to deal with their 
benefits. Maybe they are in a managed care organization or what is 
called a PPO, preferred provider organization. However, these private 
entities ought to have some bargaining power to hold down the cost for 
all of their members. Our bipartisan legislation that I have with 
Senator Snowe and Senator McCain stipulates we can have bargaining 
power for seniors in those metropolitan areas as well.
  This legislation is going to save taxpayers money as well, not just 
seniors but taxpayers because, as the Senate knows, we put out a 
substantial amount of money to offer assistance to employers to not 
drop their coverage. When the Medicare plans save seniors money on 
medicine, that means less cost for the retiree plan to make up. 
Containing costs on the Medicare side, in our view, will help keep 
costs down for employers insuring retirees as well.
  We have an opportunity to get beyond the debate about the numbers 
that came out in the last day or so, these shocking numbers that 
Medicare prescription drug care will cost $720 billion. We can get 
beyond those numbers and go to a comprehensive, bipartisan, market-
based cost-containment strategy, a bipartisan plan that will contain 
costs for rural and urban seniors in plans across the country, in plans 
in rural and urban areas, and a plan that will also provide cost 
containment for employers insuring retirees as well.
  It is our view we desperately need some common sense as it relates to 
cost containment for prescription drugs in our country. It is my view 
that giving bargaining power to millions of seniors through the private 
sector is essentially Economics 101. There is no sense waiting when the 
costs of this program go up almost daily. It started at $400 billion, 
then $500 billion, now we are at $720 billion, and we are still 
counting. With these costs continuing to go through the stratosphere, 
the choice for the Senate, in my view, is to either sit around and say 
we will just wait and see what happens--and maybe the next report will 
put this at $1 trillion--or we can take

[[Page 1800]]

the opportunity in a thoughtful, bipartisan way to do what is being 
done in communities all across the country.
  Virtually everyone who buys in quantity says: Excuse me, wouldn't you 
be willing to give me a break given the fact I am making additional 
purchases? Medicare is not doing it. It defies common sense. We have a 
bipartisan opportunity to reign in these costs that continue to soar. I 
hope the Senate will do this as soon as possible.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Vitter). The Senator from Hawaii.
  Mr. AKAKA. I thank the Chair.
  (The remarks of Mr. Akaka pertaining to the introduction of S. 324 
are located in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced Bills 
and Joint Resolutions.'')
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Arkansas is recognized.

                          ____________________