[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 151 (2005), Part 19]
[Senate]
[Pages 25932-25934]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                        PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLANS

  Mr. DURBIN. Today is the opening day for the new Medicare 
prescription drug plan D, and it is a day of great concern across 
America for millions of senior citizens who want to get it right. They 
believe, as I do, that Medicare should include a prescription drug 
benefit. It is almost hard to believe that a program that has been in 
existence for 40 years basically does not provide prescription drug 
coverage, but it started in a day when there were not that many 
prescription drugs and they were not as good. Today, we realize that 
often taking the right medication can make a person independent, 
strong, and living the life they want to live and avoiding doctors' 
care and hospital care.
  So it is certainly the thing to do. We have known it for a long time. 
We have talked about it for a long time. We debated it over 2 years ago 
and decided to pass this approach to Medicare prescription drug 
benefits. I do not think we could have dreamed up a more complicated 
approach for a benefit that is basically pretty straightforward. Many 
of us thought the plan we passed here in Congress was just a sop or a 
favor for the pharmaceutical industry. They wanted to be able to offer 
plans all across America and say to seniors: Come and figure out which 
one is best for you. Well, the problem, of course, is that there are 
hundreds and hundreds of plans across America. And now senior citizens, 
some of whom are not in the best shape physically, are forced to make a 
call.
  A fellow in Springfield, IL, told me about his 80-year-old mother who 
called him really concerned. She said: You know, I am supposed to pick 
a prescription drug plan, and they tell me to go to the Internet. What 
does that mean? You see, three-fourths of senior citizens have never 
logged on, they have never been on the Internet. They go to the 
traditional sources of information that you might expect--someone they 
trust. She went to her son and said: Can you help me through this? And 
her son came to me and said: Senator, what have you done to us? I just 
took a look at the Internet, and my mom has 40 choices. I now have to 
line up her prescription drugs and figure out which plan covers those 
drugs and how much they charge, and then I have to figure out which 
plan will work with the drugstore that she is comfortable with, the one 
she trusts. I have to put that all together and make a decision for 
her, and I better do it quickly. I have until May 16, and if I wait 
until after that, then I am going face a penalty.
  She is lucky. She had her son to call. Some seniors don't have 
anybody to call. But there are people calling them. Do you know who is 
calling them? The insurance companies that want to sell these plans, 
some of the pharmaceutical companies, some of the drug companies, they 
are calling the senior citizens and telling them: We have a deal for 
you. And many of these people, bewildered by what they are facing, 
really don't know where to turn. You can't walk into a drugstore in my 
hometown of Springfield, IL, without having somebody go up to a senior 
citizen and say: Let me talk to you about this prescription drug 
benefit.
  Think about that. Some people have knocks on the door and phone calls 
with folks saying: We have the best plan in the world for you. In fact, 
the Attorney General of Illinois, Lisa Madigan, had a press conference 
with us a few weeks ago. They are finding evidence of rampant fraud 
when it comes to companies that are sadly taking advantage of our 
seniors. They are calling them and saying: Incidentally, will you give 
us your Social Security number so we can log you into the system? These 
people unwittingly give their Social Security number that can open up 
so many elements of their personal life they should not be advertising 
and publicizing.
  How did we ever reach this point? Is this the best we can do? I don't 
think so. When it comes to helping our seniors with a real prescription 
drug benefit, America can do better--a lot better--than what we are 
asking the seniors to go through right now. American seniors are 
confused about this plan, and Congress needs to give them at least more 
time to figure it out.
  Let me show a chart that explains part of it. ``Understanding How the 
Benefit Will Be Administered.'' They asked seniors:

       To the best of your knowledge, do seniors in the 
     traditional Medicare Program have to sign up with a private 
     plan to get the new Medicare drug benefit or not?

  Yes, 35 percent; no, 32 percent; don't know, 33 percent.

       Do seniors have to enroll in a Medicare PPO or HMO to get 
     the new Medicare drug benefit or not?

  Yes, 17 percent; no, 40 percent; don't know, 42 percent.
  According to a poll released by the Kaiser Family Foundation last 
week, two-thirds of seniors don't even know they have to choose a 
private plan. One-third of seniors think they are going to get their 
drugs through Medicare, and that is wrong. That is the proposal we 
suggested on the Democratic side of the aisle to make this simple and 
straightforward, a Medicare plan where the Federal Government would 
bargain with the pharmaceutical companies to get bulk discounts and low 
prices, saving seniors money and saving taxpayers money. But the 
pharmaceutical companies wanted no part of it. They want to be able to 
charge the highest prices they can. They want the smallest bargaining 
units they can come up with: groups of seniors rather than all Medicare 
seniors.
  Let me show another chart which spells out some of the problems with 
the current approach seniors are facing. This chart--and this was part 
of a survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation, Harvard School of Public 
Health, on awareness and use of the Medicare Web site, medicare.gov. 
They asked seniors:

       Have you ever heard of the Web site medicare.gov?

  Two-thirds said no.

       Have you ever looked for information on medicare.gov?

  Three-fourths of them have never been online.
  Let me show some other statistics that show the gravity of this 
problem that faces seniors as they have to make literally life-and-
death decisions.
  The Kaiser Family Foundation asked in a survey, ``Seniors' Beliefs 
about Enrollment'':

       Do seniors generally need to sign up to get the new 
     Medicare prescription drug benefit or will coverage 
     automatically begin by January 1, 2006?

  Have to sign up, 64 percent; 10 percent said it will begin 
automatically; 25 percent, don't know. That was in October 2005.
  We are finding fewer and fewer seniors understand the obligation and 
responsibility they currently have. If a senior does not sign up for a 
Medicare drug plan in 2006 but wants to enroll in a future year, which 
of the following is true: He or she will face a financial penalty? 
Thirty-six percent said yes; 27 percent said don't know; 19 percent 
said no penalties; 17 percent said maybe.

[[Page 25933]]

  Most alarming, 63 percent of seniors don't know they will face 
financial penalties if they don't sign up by May of next year. If a 
senior decides in June of next year to go back and try to sign up, they 
will have to wait until November of that same year for the next open 
enrollment period. Boy, you have to read the fine print. And to think 
we are putting millions of seniors through this is hard to believe.
  I would say this: If you enjoy doing your tax returns, you are going 
to love signing up for this program because this is going to confront 
you with more choices and more new information and more fine print that 
can get you in trouble than most seniors could ever imagine. For every 
month a senior waits, they will pay a penalty of 1 percent on the 
national base premium. That penalty is added to their premium every 
month for the rest of their lives. So by May, if you haven't figured it 
out and you want to wait until October or November, you now have 
incurred a penalty of 1 percent a month which you now will have to pay 
as long as you are part of the program, and the penalty can increase 
each year as premiums increase. This is some punishment for not signing 
up.
  Let me talk about my State of Illinois. There are 17 insurance 
companies offering 84 different Medicare HMO or PPO plans. There are 16 
prescription drug organizations offering 52 different prescription drug 
benefits, for a total of 136 plans in my State of Illinois. In Cook 
County alone, there will be 64 different Medicare drug plans.
  I asked my staff to act as if they are a senior signing up for this 
plan and find out what they can. You won't be able to make much of this 
if you are following this debate. But if you think that is a big, long 
list of plans to choose from in the State of Illinois, that is half the 
story. Here is the whole story. This is what your mother and 
grandmother, your father and grandfather will have to sort through. 
They will have to figure out what the premium might be, what the 
deductible is, what is the copay, whether they are going to fill the 
donut, which is another problem with this plan, whether it covers your 
drug.
  Incidentally, you know what we found out, even if you get on their 
Web site, you can't find out if the most common drugs are going to be 
covered by these plans. We tried to find out if Zocor, a common drug 
for cholesterol, would be covered by these plans. Not in a single 
instance could we gather that information off the Web site. You have to 
call the plan. You are put into voice mail. You have to wait patiently 
until your turn comes to ask whether one of these plans is the best 
plan for you.
  This chart is what a Cook County senior who doesn't have any 
extenuating circumstances would have to evaluate. What I mean by 
``extenuating circumstances'' is whether they face factors that make 
the comparison of these plans even more difficult. This person I am 
talking about is not in a nursing home, not eligible for State 
assistance through Illinois Cares Rx or Medicaid, not eligible for 
Federal low-income assistance, nor is she on Social Security 
disability.
  We assume she is taking four drugs: Zocor for cholesterol, Nexium for 
chronic heartburn, Fosomax for osteoporosis, and Relafen for arthritis.
  Because the formularies--the list of drugs you can receive under each 
plan--are not listed in the ``Medicare and You'' handbook she received 
last week, she has to call every single plan to find out if her drugs 
are covered, or she can go out to the Web site, if she is one out of 
four seniors who have ever done that in their life, for companies.
  First, she has to find the Web site because they are not listed in 
the Medicare handbook sent to seniors. Once she knows which companies 
cover the drugs, she will have to add up the copays, deductibles, and 
premiums to determine the best deal. Is that the kind of assignment you 
want to give to your mother in a nursing home? Is that the kind of 
assignment you want to give to seniors perhaps dealing with their own 
challenges and problems in their life?
  Unfortunately, that is the assignment this bill does give. When the 
Kaiser Family Foundation told seniors they would have more than 40 
plans to choose from, 70 percent of seniors said more plans make the 
program confusing, and that is obvious.
  Sally Moss from Jacksonville, IL, wrote to me and said:

       On my kitchen bar sits material I have received in the mail 
     from Social Security, AARP, and companies advertising their 
     plans.

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Illinois has exceeded the 
time allotted in morning business.
  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent for 8 additional 
minutes.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, Sally Moss wrote:

       On my kitchen bar sits materials I received in the mail 
     from Social Security, AARP, and companies advertising their 
     plans.
       Periodically, I sit down to try to make sense of it, 
     knowing that I need to make a decision before long. This idea 
     of having to select a drug insurance plan from the private 
     sector is the most ludicrous thing. . . . I am only 66 years 
     old, with a major in business administration and a minor in 
     computer science, and have only been retired for 16 months. 
     If I am frustrated and confused, imagine those who are much 
     older and less educated.

  What can seniors do at this point if they don't have someone in their 
family they can turn to, whom they can trust, who will help them work 
through this morass of Government redtape to get to the plan for them? 
Turn to a group that doesn't have a financial interest in your 
situation. Never, ever give out your Social Security number. Go to 
Government agencies such as the Senior Health Insurance Program in my 
home State of Illinois, but be prepared for a long wait. We had our 
office call on behalf of some seniors to find out how long it would 
take to get information, and it turns out you are put in voice mail and 
you could wait for a long time.
  In Peoria, IL, there are 23 volunteers answering the phones. They 
tell us they need 100 to get the job done in that one town.
  It is not uncommon for seniors to attend two or three informational 
sessions because this benefit is so complicated. Some seniors get 
pretty emotional. They don't want to make the wrong decision.
  In DeKalb County, there are four counselors for the whole county. Bob 
Rosemier is so concerned about the lack of staff that he is trying to 
get the DeKalb County Board to put on counselors to explain this 
complicated Federal program.
  I am cosponsoring with Senator Nelson and Senator Schumer a bill 
called the Medicare Informed Choice Act of 2005. I ask any of my 
colleagues in the Senate who are receiving phone calls from seniors in 
their State facing the same problems I just described--finding it 
almost impossible to wade through this information and make the right 
choice, concerned they won't be able to do it even in the few months we 
have given them, worried over the penalties that could be assessed 
against them if they miss the next May 16 deadline--to help us pass 
this bill before we go home for Thanksgiving.
  This bill does three things. It delays the late enrollment penalties 
for an additional 6 months so people have an entire year to sign up 
without penalty. It gives every Medicare beneficiary the opportunity to 
make a one-time change in plan enrollment at any point in 2006, so if a 
senior makes a mistake and chooses the wrong plan, it can be remedied. 
It also protects employees from being dropped by their former 
employer's plan during the first year of implementation so that 
beneficiaries have time to correct enrollment mistakes.
  The Medicare Informed Choice Act is a modest, time-limited step we 
can take to ease the pressure on our senior citizens so that in the 
first year they get the decision made and made right, and if they make 
a mistake, they will not be penalized for it.
  I urge all my colleagues, if you believed passionately in this bill 
as it was passed--and I did not--at least be sensitive to the people 
back home who are struggling to make sense out of this

[[Page 25934]]

complicated measure. I urge all my colleagues to join me in the effort 
with Senator Nelson and others to help protect Medicare beneficiaries 
during the benefits implementation period.

                          ____________________