[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 151 (2005), Part 19]
[House]
[Pages 25351-25358]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                              NATURAL GAS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Fortenberry). Under the Speaker's 
announced policy of January 4, 2005, the gentleman from Pennsylvania 
(Mr. Peterson) is recognized for 60 minutes.
  Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to talk about 
what I think is really the issue of the day, and that is energy. Energy 
runs this country. Energy is what we use to get to work. Energy is what 
we use to run our homes. Energy is what we use to manufacture and 
process things.
  Yes, it all started 5 miles from where I live many years ago when 
Drake Well discovered oil. That is about 150 years ago. Energy then 
became the major component of the industrial revolution in this country 
and the world, and oil was king. Oil still plays a major role. I am not 
so sure it is king, but Drake Well was the beginning.
  Then we got into the World War I and World War II era, and coal was 
king. America is probably the Saudi Arabia of coal. We have coal in the 
West and coal in the East. The eastern part of the country furnished 
both soft and hard coal that fueled the Industrial Revolution.
  In recent years, we have had a shift from coal to natural gas. Now 
natural gas has always played a role. The major share of American homes 
are heated with natural gas. The majority of small businesses are 
heated with natural gas. Natural gas plays a huge role in 
manufacturing. I think that is the one that is least understood.
  This morning we had a hearing held by a group of American employers 
who employ millions of Americans. It was the American Chemical 
Association, American Forest and Paper Products Association, the 
National Association of Manufacturers, and 13 other agencies, 
Agriculture Energy Alliance,

[[Page 25352]]

American Plastics Council. It goes on and on, rubber manufacturers, 
Fertilizer Institute. All of these people today had one message for 
Congress: Solve the natural gas problem that is forcing us out of 
business.
  The use of natural gas has been skyrocketing. I can show Members a 
chart that shows it. The red is the growing use of natural gas. We are 
right about at this point here, and it is only going to get worse 
because we have expanded the use of natural gas in this country, 
particularly for the generation of electricity. One-fourth of our 
natural gas now generates electricity, and that figure continues to 
grow.
  We now have an inadequate supply because as we have simultaneously 
increased the use of natural gas, we simultaneously locked up the major 
areas of this country that are rich in natural gas.
  We only have about 3 percent of the world's oil at our access, and we 
import about 60 percent of our oil. That is a path we cannot follow. We 
need to be veering from the use of oil everywhere we can because it is 
not that we are buying it from friends at a fair price.
  Just a few years ago, natural gas was less than $2 a thousand and oil 
was $10 a barrel. That went on for decades and that prevented other 
types of energy from competing because those prices were so cheap that 
we just became complacent as a country, not realizing that somewhere 
down the road, the price of these energy fuels could really be harmful 
to this country. Well, we are there today.
  We recently passed an energy bill that does a lot of things for the 
future. It does a lot of things for wind and solar and biomass and 
ethanol and the list goes on and on, hydrogen fuel cells, but they are 
all long term. There are incentives in that bill for promoting it.

                              {time}  1700

  But it did little to promote natural gas. There were a couple of 
incentives for deep drilling, but in my view, natural gas is the crisis 
of the day.
  We have heard an awful lot on television about gasoline prices. Every 
newscast for weeks talked about the highest gasoline prices in history, 
and at one point after Katrina we were over $3, $3.25, unheard-of 
prices, and they have settled down now about a buck now. They are $2-
something or $2.30 or $2.25, depending on where one lives, but they had 
come back down.
  At one point gasoline prices had doubled over a 5-year period, and 
that was all the news. But at the same time natural gas prices had 
increased 700 percent. That is seven times, and there was just little 
discussion of that.
  There has been little warning for the American public that heating 
their homes was going to be so expensive this year. There was little 
warning to our businesses who use natural gas as heat, who use it to 
melt, smelt, bend products, use it as an ingredient to making products.
  I think one of the things that was pointed out today was that 96 
percent of things produced in some way use natural gas as an ingredient 
or as a heat to make them. So it is entwined in our whole manufacturing 
and production base that it really is the fuel that depends on where 
America goes. And the tragedy of natural gas prices when they have 
increased 700 percent is, we are the only country where that has 
happened.
  We are in a competitive world. We compete with the whole world in 
this global economy. And when we paid $65 and almost $70 for oil, all 
our competitors, all of the rest of the world, paid that high price. So 
it was painful, but it was equally painful to our competitors.
  Now, in natural gas, that is not the case. In natural gas, while we 
were paying $14.50, now about $11.50 or $12, but when we were paying 
$14.50, we were the only country in the world paying that. Canada was 
less. In Europe it is about half of what we pay for natural gas. And 
our big competitors like China, Japan, Taiwan, who manufacture a lot of 
products we buy in our stores, they are buying natural gas for a third 
of what we do. The rest of the world it is less than $2, and countries 
like North Africa and Russia are less than $1.
  So there is a huge cost differential for manufacturers and processors 
and people heating their homes in this country than the rest of the 
world, and that puts us at a huge disadvantage. And currently our 
schools and our hospitals and our YMCAs and YWCAs and our churches and 
colleges and universities and small businesses are buying gas at twice 
the price they paid last year, and most of them are purchasing on 
contract because they saved money on a contract basis in years in the 
past, but now it is costing them.
  And big producers, industries that are threatened, are the ones that 
met here today and talked to Congress saying, please do something to 
open up the supply of natural gas because the only thing that will make 
a difference on price is supply. So the steel companies and the 
aluminum countries and the brass makers and the petrochemical and the 
polymers and the plastics and the fertilizers, they all were pleading 
with Congress today in their hearing to open up supply, give us the 
chance to get fair prices for natural gas so we can compete.
  Mr. Speaker, this is an issue that we must deal with. If Congress 
does not step up to the plate and open up supply of natural gas, we 
will say good-bye to a million or more of the best manufacturing and 
processing jobs left in America.
  We have lost a lot of jobs in America to cheap labor and for lack of 
modern technology. But this is a crisis caused by government, caused by 
Congress, caused by the last three administrations who had Presidential 
moratoriums on natural gas production on the Outer Continental Shelf, 
and locked up millions of acres in the West also that are rich areas 
for natural gas and, at the same time, urged those who were producing 
electricity from coal to switch to natural gas.
  Florida is one of the States that have switched, and now 75 to 80 
percent of their electricity is produced by natural gas. California is 
another big coastal State that is a huge consumer of natural gas. And 
yet both of those States have been fighting tooth and nail that we must 
not open up the Outer Continental Shelf for production. They claim that 
it will destroy their beaches, it will destroy their tourism.
  Mr. Speaker, there is no evidence to prove that. There just 
absolutely is no evidence. I have asked at every forum for months, Show 
me a natural gas production well that has polluted a beach.
  Now, I believe that we should do it offshore far enough that it is 
not visible, so it is not something that people have to look at. And I 
love to go to the beaches. I love the beaches as much as anybody, and I 
want them to be clean and pristine and nice and full of fish. And the 
proof is that in the parts of the ocean where we produce both gas and 
oil, fishing is very good. It has not been a detriment to aquatic life. 
In fact, the least imprint by those who know this issue best, and I am 
not speaking about big companies, I am speaking about scientists who 
know this issue best, the least imprint for energy production is when 
they get 20 miles offshore. Nobody sees it. Nobody knows it is there. 
The distribution lines are all underground.
  One might say, how can I prove that? Well, it is interesting. Canada 
is known as a very green, sensitive country. They produce offshore on 
both coasts. Great Britain, Denmark, New Zealand, Australia, Norway, 
Sweden, all environmentally sensitive countries who produce huge 
amounts of natural gas and oil on their Outer Continental Shelves.
  What is the Outer Continental Shelf? The Outer Continental Shelf is 
the first 200 miles offshore. The first 3 miles are controlled by the 
States under current law, and the next 197 miles are controlled by the 
Federal Government.
  Some years ago, the Congress, about 25 years ago, started passing 
language in every Interior bill that said the Department of Interior 
could not spend dollars to lease land for oil and gas on the Outer 
Continental Shelf. So that has effectively locked it up. And then we 
have had three Presidents in a row who have a Presidential moratorium 
that we could not lease out land for production on the Outer 
Continental Shelf.

[[Page 25353]]

  So here where, in the land of plenty with natural gas to spare, we 
currently produce 84 percent of our natural gas, we import 14 percent 
from Canada, and we import 2 percent in liquefied natural gas, which 
can come from anywhere in the world. It is a very difficult process. We 
have to have the largest ships known to man. We have to have very 
controversial ports where we bring it and turn it back into gas after 
we have liquefied it.
  And I am not saying that is inappropriate, but it is not the answer 
to the looming shortage of natural gas that is going to be around for 
the next 15 to 20 years because every projection I have looked at shows 
the need for natural gas growing much faster than the ability to 
produce it.
  We are actually drilling twice as many oil wells today as we 
historically did, and yet we are not producing a lot more natural gas. 
And the reason for that is, for the bulk of it, we are producing most 
of those wells in old, tired fields that we have been producing out of 
for decades and the bloom is off. The flush wells are gone, and the 
wells we drill do not last as long and have not held up. So as we 
continue to add and add wells to production, we are just not gaining. 
We are just not closing the gap. We are increasing the shortfall. And 
we realize that just in the short span of time we went from gas that 
was less than $2 to just a couple of weeks ago we had gas at $14.50, 
prices the industry never dreamed possible.
  We had had the highest gas prices this summer. They were running 
$6.50 and $7 and then $7 and $8 and were edging up towards $9, and 
everybody was just stunned because last year the average price in the 
summer was $5.30. The year before that was about $4.50. The year before 
that they were about 3-something.
  This was summer prices when gas was the cheapest, and that is when we 
normally put about 20 percent of our gas underground in storage caverns 
so that we have enough supply in the winter when it gets very cold and 
we use huge amounts of natural gas, one, to run our industries, and, 
two, to heat our homes and our churches and our businesses.
  Well, the summer prices have shown us a tremendous increase, from 
less than $2 to 3-something, to 4-something to 5-something, and then 
this year we were running at $7, $8, and sometimes more than $8 when 
Katrina hit. And then we went up to $14; we doubled. It shows us the 
sensitivity.
  A lot of people ask, how do we bring prices down? We increase supply. 
When we increase supply, the market comes down. But we cannot increase 
supply if we do not open up drilling. And it is interesting that some 
people just have a real problem with the ``drill'' word, but a gas well 
is not something to fear. It is a 6-inch hole in the ground with a 
steel pipe. They cement the bottom. They cement the top, and they let 
gas out. Gas comes out under its own pressure into a collection system 
where it is cleaned and impurities are taken out; and then it comes to 
our homes, and we just turn on our gas burner and cook our meals. We 
turn on the gas burner and heat our homes. Industry uses it in so many 
ways.
  I vividly remember in the late 1970s and early 1980s, I was a retail 
supermarket operator, and we had high gas prices then, high oil prices 
then, and we had three extremely cold winters, the coldest we had had 
on record for a long time. And during that period of time, in the 
retail supermarket, it was always difficult to make a profit in January 
and February and sometimes March. Then when warm weather came and 
winter costs left, we then came back to where we made a profit.
  Well, I remember those years because people spent so much money to 
travel because of oil prices being high and spent so much to heat their 
homes because of gas prices that by spring they had backed up and owed 
their gas company and owed energy bills, and they were clear into 
April, May, and almost June before they had those paid off to where 
they were shopping normally.
  And 60-some percent of the economy in this country is people 
shopping. About 60 percent of Americans spend every dollar they make 
from payday to payday, and when they spend a huge amount more for 
travel, like they have this year, and this winter they will spend a lot 
more than usual, in some places double, for heating their homes, there 
is going to be a lot less spendable income.
  The poorest among us, the young couples and the seniors among us who 
are trying to stay in their homes are going to be the ones who pay the 
severe price. The upper middle class will feel pain, but they will not 
be endangered.
  I believe, with the energy prices this year, we are going to see 
seniors who cannot adequately heat their homes. I already hear of 
churches who are talking of not using the sanctuary, only meeting in 
the basement. That is not the kind of society I think we want, and it 
is not one we should have.
  The current prices of natural gas are only abnormally high because 
Congress has failed to act. The Presidents have failed to lift the 
moratoriums on the Outer Continental Shelf. Eighty-five percent of our 
coastline, we get 40 percent of our energy in this country from just a 
small portion of the gulf under the States of Texas, Louisiana, 
Mississippi, and a little bit of Alabama. That is the only place we 
produce on the OCS in great quantities. There are a few places on the 
West Coast, but not many, that we produce a little bit of energy, that 
were there existing.
  But the moratoriums have locked up everything. And like I said 
earlier, we are the only country who has done that, and it makes no 
sense.
  Natural gas production is not a threat to our coastlines. It is not a 
threat to tourism. In fact, I think States like Florida and California 
who receive most of their electricity that has been produced by natural 
gas, when those long-term contracts end, they are going to have huge 
increases in electric costs because they make their electricity from 
natural gas.
  And many of those big companies have long-term contracts. The long-
term contracts in my district that have been coming due, people are 
switching from $6 gas to $14 gas. I have had companies that even had to 
purchase $16 gas. Those are unheard-of prices, unthought-of prices.
  Monday I was at a celebration of a new lime kiln plant that is in my 
district, for a company, Graymont, a good company that spent $60 
million to bring in a new kiln to make lime. I said to them right away, 
``What energy do you use to make the lime?'' Because they have to heat 
it to 2,400 degrees. That is hot.
  They said, ``We use coal here. We are fortunate.'' But they said, 
``We have lime kiln plants that use natural gas.''
  I said, ``What are you are doing there?''
  They said, ``They are shut down.''
  We are going to find that people who make bricks, people who dry 
products, people who cook products, there are going to be companies 
that curtail production. Some are going to stop production.

                              {time}  1715

  Why? Because they cannot pay the current natural gas prices and sell 
those products in a marketplace where they are competing with people in 
other countries where natural gas prices are a fraction of what they 
are here.
  We have to realize we are not an island to ourselves. Unfortunately, 
there have been a lot of reasons besides cheap labor that companies 
have chosen to produce overseas in other countries. Some are the legal 
issues because of the multitude of lawsuits in this country that we 
have inadequately curtailed, and we are the most lawsuit-happy country 
in the world, and multimillion-dollar lawsuits that cause companies to 
lose their profitability and go out of business and leave this country 
have been one of the reasons we have lost a lot of jobs overseas.
  Cheap labor. I have always said companies who use the newest, most 
modern technology can compete; but, unfortunately, we have a lot of 
companies who did not modernize their technology and are still very 
labor intensive, and they got to where they could not compete, and so 
they went overseas. But there is no reason that this country should 
lose one job, let alone a

[[Page 25354]]

million jobs, and we could lose a million jobs, because of energy 
prices, because we have huge reserves on our Outer Continental Shelf. 
We have huge reserves in the Midwest; not as easily accessible to our 
coastlines where our populations are, but the Outer Continental Shelf 
is very accessible.
  I guess the tragedy is there is a piece in the gulf called Tract 181. 
It was not under moratorium, as the rest of our Outer Continental Shelf 
was; it just was not leased. It was there, ready to be leased. The 
Clinton administration had it listed to be leased. It was delisted for 
some reason. It is not in the current 5-year plan. There is movement to 
move it into the 5-year plan. I support that, but that is not enough. 
But that tract alone is the most quickly available to American 
consumers, because it is right next to where we produce gas and oil 
today; and the wells, as they would be produced, would be immediately 
hooked into the system that is there. The timely thing would be the 
process of leasing, and then all the paperwork and red tape companies 
have to go through to get those leases enacted and get the permits to 
drill the wells and located; and that would take maybe a year or a year 
and a half. But within 18 months, we could be producing out of that 
portion of the gulf that is called Tract 181, and I have yet to hear 
that anybody has a good reason why we have not opened up that tract.
  We know we have had protests from Florida. It is not their land. They 
should not have anything to say about it, in my view, except right at 
the top where it is close to the panhandle. They are currently talking 
about slicing that corner off and leasing about 70 percent of it, but 
we have to pass legislation to do that. Congress has to act. We have 
not acted. But, in my view, that is not enough. We have to open up the 
Outer Continental Shelf.
  Now, I have a bill that is cosponsored with Mr. Abercrombie from 
Hawaii, and he has helped me champion this bill. It would open up the 
Outer Continental Shelf all around this country, the 85 percent that is 
locked up. It would increase the States rights area from 3 miles to 20 
miles. Now, that guarantees that no one would ever see a rig, no one 
would ever see the production platforms because, after 12 miles, even 
on a clear day, you cannot see them. They are out of sight. They are 
just not visible.
  Also, I am still waiting for someone to show me a natural gas-
producing well that has caused pollution. Natural gas is a gas. In 
fact, the famous triangle down in the gulf had eruptions of natural gas 
that actually took planes out of the air. It was actually a crack that 
opened up a fissure in the ocean floor that allowed huge amounts of 
natural gas to escape into the atmosphere in a way that anybody who was 
in that area was endangered, and the ocean would just bubble because 
natural gas was coming up.
  Natural gas is everywhere underground. It is in lakes, in ponds, in 
our ocean floor. Natural gas normally seeps up and comes up as bubbles 
in the water, not harmful to our atmosphere, not harmful to our 
environment. Natural gas is the clean fuel. It is the one with no 
NoX, no SoX. If you are worried about 
CO2, only one-fourth of the CO2 comes from 
natural gas of all the other fossil fuels. It is almost the perfect 
fuel.
  I think the thing that many of us do not realize that was stated 
today in the news conference by all the production companies, and I 
have a picture here of everything from tires to cars to plastic 
objects, to paint, to makeup, face creams, skin softeners, shampoos, 
all are made from products developed out of natural gas. It is just a 
wonderful product that God has given us to use, and it is readily 
available.
  This country has no shortage of natural gas. We have a shortage 
because government has chosen not to allow us to harvest the rich 
bounty that is out there. We should be using natural gas as the bridge 
to the future. My vision is that if natural gas were more affordable, 
we could do like a college in my district that is now paying a premium 
that is using natural gas to power their bus fleet. All the buses 
there, many buses in cities in California use natural gas. Here in 
Washington, D.C. some of the buses use natural gas.
  Now, today, that is costing them more than if they were burning 
diesel; but we all know that diesel does not burn clean like natural 
gas; and for our cities, it would be environmentally advantageous to 
have all of our buses, all of our school buses, our transit systems, 
all of our taxi cabs, all of our short-haul vehicles, short delivery 
trucks, our air-conditioning and all the repair people that are out on 
the road and go home every night, they could all be powered with 
natural gas with a very inexpensive changeover.
  A gasoline engine can be altered to burn natural gas. The only 
problem with natural gas is storing enough of it so that you can do 
long-distance hauls. So all of our short-haul vehicles, all of our 
construction vehicles, all of our little engines that are running 
around in our airports, they could all be on natural gas; and we would 
benefit by clean air, we would save money if the prices were right. We 
could lessen our need for oil, foreign oil, from unstable parts of the 
world at prices set by cartels, groups who want to control us.
  There is no reason, there is no good argument why natural gas today, 
the price of it has become a barrier, but it should be the bridge. The 
first hydrogen vehicles have been run with natural gas as the fuel to 
make the hydrogen. Later that will change, but that is currently the 
easiest way to make hydrogen. So natural gas just feeds into our lives 
in so many ways, and it is so readily available in this country.
  The tragedy is that this country could lose a million or two jobs, 
because if we do not do something soon to open up supply, one fact that 
I can give you today is that there are 120 chemical plants, and these 
chemical plants are very capital intensive. That is one of the reasons 
they have not moved as quickly as they might have, because there are 
120 plants at a cost of $1 billion each that are under construction in 
the world today. Mr. Speaker, 119 of them are in other countries.
  That shows us that the chemical plants of the future, and we are the 
leader today in making chemicals. We will not be the leader down the 
road. With these natural gas prices, we are forcing chemical plants to 
leave. We have already lost over 40 percent of our fertilizer industry 
because nitrogen fertilizer, between 70 and 80 percent of the cost of 
making it is natural gas, polymers and plastics; and we use plastics 
and polymers in every part of our lives. We cannot buy anything that 
does not have plastic on it, in it, or a part of it. Again, they use an 
ingredient of natural gas and they use natural gas to melt it and bend 
it and shape it.
  The problem is, as I said earlier, the parts of the world that we 
compete with, such as Europe, half our price. Dow Chemical a few years 
ago moved 200 jobs to Germany, not a cheap labor market, a very 
sophisticated workforce there, a very capable country with technology; 
Japan, Taiwan and China, a third of our price. And then the rest of the 
world, under $2 in countries like Africa, and Russia, less than $1.
  Mr. Speaker, it is imperative that this country step up to the plate. 
If we do not wait any longer, if we do not wait months and years, if we 
let the employers of this country, we let the producers of this 
country, the manufacturers of this country know that this Congress is 
serious about increasing the supply of natural gas, the price will come 
down. The capital investment is huge. They do not want to build new 
plants if they do not have to; they do not want to move if they do not 
have to.
  But if we continue to not open up the Outer Continental Shelf, it is 
my prediction that we will lose a million or more jobs in just a few 
years ahead. To prevent that, we have to open up some in the Midwest. 
We have to open up the Outer Continental Shelf, and we have to follow 
the lead of environmentally sensitive countries like Canada, the United 
Kingdom, Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, New Zealand, Australia who 
produce out there every, every day.
  Now, why have we not done this? Well, there is really a couple of 
States

[[Page 25355]]

and a couple of Governors who have been steadfast opponents, California 
and Florida. They have argued vociferously that we must not do this. 
For some reason, they have been convinced that their beautiful 
coastlines will be ruined and that their tourism business, which is 
huge, will be ruined. Folks, there are no facts to prove that. There is 
no evidence to prove that. Those are just outrageous, outlandish 
statements that continue to be made and believed by many, but not true.
  I have asked repeatedly, come and debate me on how we will destroy 
our shorelines, how we will destroy our beaches by the production of 
natural gas offshore in the Outer Continental Shelf. That first 200 
miles, from 20 miles to 200, that is 180 miles of the Outer Continental 
Shelf that we would open up. The Peterson-Abercrombie plan, as I 
mentioned earlier, we will remove the moratorium on all of our 
shorelines for natural gas only, giving the States 20 miles to protect, 
and then from 20 to 200, we will produce. Then we will allow States to 
opt out for oil if they choose to, and they would also be rewarded for 
a portion of the royalty.
  This is on behalf of homeowners, businesses, employers, churches, 
schools that we need to do this. Florida, for one State, utilizes 233 
percent more natural gas than they produce, and they are surrounded by 
the richest natural gas reserves anywhere in America. I think that is 
unfair. I think as a State, they need to step up on the plate. They 
need to produce their fair share. Or they need to curtail their use.
  I remember just a few years ago when they were producing most of 
their electricity from coal. They have recently shifted, at the 
suggestion of the Federal Government, to natural gas production. Now 
their electricity is produced by natural gas, and I think, if you are 
going to be the biggest utilizers per capita of natural gas, and you 
sit in one of the richest areas of the world, you have to come in and 
help solve this problem.
  Because, Mr. Speaker, Florida and California are rich in tourism. 
Many of us love to go there and enjoy their beautiful beaches and enjoy 
their warm weather in the wintertime. But most of the people that I 
meet there are pretty successful. And as we lose the success in the 
northern parts of this country, as we lose the ability to manufacture 
and make products, as we lose those wonderful jobs that people can 
afford, nice homes, educate their children, have a nice vehicle, have a 
pension, those are the jobs that are produced by all of these 
industries that are being challenged by natural gas prices.
  And as we lose those, the number of customers, the number of people, 
I was a retailer for 26 years and I always speak of customers, those 
who will come to warm places like Florida and California to spend their 
vacation dollars will not have the money to do that. So they will lose 
in the end, and the cost of electricity there will sky- rocket when new 
contracts come in if these gas prices persist. They will pay horrendous 
prices.
  In fact, it is interesting. I have a letter here from the 
association, though the governments of Florida and California protest 
vociferously, the Associated Industries of Florida, and some said to 
minimize that that this was just a small organization. Well, it has 
10,000 members of all kinds of businesses and industry, from mom and 
pops to large companies in Florida.

                              {time}  1730

  And it says we appreciate the reviewing of all the current OCS areas, 
including the areas that have, until now, been off limits due to the 
moratorium, which included the Atlantic, Pacific and eastern Gulf of 
Mexico region. Research documents that these areas hold substantial 
undiscovered, but technically recoverable energy resources that will be 
absolutely critical to America's national security and to the continued 
growth of our economy and to securing jobs for virtually every sector 
of our economy.
  If America does not look to expanding exploration, this is Florida 
businesses speaking, drilling in those OCS areas, then America will 
unnecessarily pay a high price and incur a heavy burden.
  The U.S. Energy Information Administration forecasts that by 2025 
petroleum demand will increase by 39 percent and natural gas demand, by 
34 percent. Higher energy prices have exacted a toll on our economy by 
slowing our growth already. Natural gas costs for the chemical industry 
in America have increased by $10 billion since 2003.
  Of 120 chemical plants being built around the world with price tags 
of $1 billion or more each, only one is being built in the United 
States. As a result, Associated Industries of Florida recommends to the 
MNS, Mineral Management Agency, that expanded leases and sales are 
important to our country, to our citizens and to our way of life.
  To not utilize our available energy resources when it can be 
accomplished in an environmentally sensitive way would be a disservice 
to our country. We need to ensure that we have a brighter future by 
adopting the OCS leasing program.
  Now tomorrow I will be a part of a natural gas hearing that will be 
held by the Interior Committee and the Energy and Water Committee of 
Appropriations, and in those hearings we will bring in the users of 
natural gas and we will hear from them; and here is some testimony that 
I think will probably be there from the Illinois Farm Bureau.
  ``Whether it is gasoline, diesel, electricity or natural gas, farmers 
and ranchers must have access to reliable and affordable energy inputs. 
Unfortunately, our country's existing energy policies make it 
increasingly difficult for all of us to produce food and fiber for the 
United States and the world while providing for our own families. Based 
on USDA data, the American Farm Bureau estimates that increased energy 
input prices during the 2003 and 2004 growing season cost U.S. 
agriculture $6 billion in added expenses.''
  That comes right out of the farmers' profits. And we know farmers do 
not get rich. Farmers work hard to produce the milk and the grain and 
the food that we feed our families. Based on USDA data, ``the 2005 
growing season has been especially dismal from a business cost 
perspective for agriculture. Higher energy costs, and specifically 
natural gas costs, have come at a time when commodity prices are 
extremely depressed.''
  So on top of high energy prices they have had low commodity prices, 
so they have not gotten a good price for their products.
  Natural gas is critically important to agriculture, because it is 
used both directly and indirectly in nearly every aspect of farm 
operations.''
  Here we go, natural gas used again and again.
  ``Natural gas is used to produce nitrogen fertilizers and farm 
chemicals as well as electricity for lighting and irrigation. Natural 
gas and LP gas are also used in agriculture to dry grain as well as 
heat barns and confined facilities of livestock and poultry operations. 
Needless to say, it is vitally important that U.S. agriculture and 
associated industries have access to affordable supplies of natural 
gas.''
  Then they go on to say, ``There are several reasons why the price of 
natural gas has skyrocketed. First, our national energy policy has 
discouraged domestic exploration.'' It is actually prohibited, not just 
discouraged; it is prohibited, recovery of oil and natural gas, which 
has made us more dependent on foreign energy sources. ``Second, many 
power plants have been forced to use natural gas for generating 
electricity in order to comply with environmental regulation, even 
though we have huge reserves of coal and the technology for its safe, 
clean use. The Energy Information Administration estimates demand for 
natural gas will increase 54 percent by 2025, with electric power 
generation accounting for 33 percent of that consumption.''
  In closing, this is what the farm community said:
  ``The `perfect storm,' the combination of significantly higher energy 
and fertilizer cost, coupled with falling grain prices, spells serious 
trouble for rural America. For this reason, it is our hope Congress 
will act soon to further address the energy needs of our Nation and 
find solutions for this natural gas problem we face.''

[[Page 25356]]

  It was interesting, my staff was contacted by a Florida paper 
recently that said, Why is your boss so persistent on this issue? Why 
does he not just say his piece and go away? They said, We checked it 
out, and he is not highly financially supported by the oil industry or 
the natural gas industry, and so why is he doing this? And I guess I 
was a little disappointed in that, that we would only do something 
because somebody supported us.
  And my answer to that newspaper is, I am speaking on behalf of the 
citizens in my district and all of rural America and all of America for 
affordable energy prices to heat our homes, for affordable energy 
prices to conduct our businesses and our churches and our Ys and our 
hospitals because that is what makes it tick.
  And these energy prices are going to put a kink in every budget in 
America, from homeowners to hospitals to retailers to education; they 
are all going to pay a significantly higher price. And our service 
agencies that are out there helping people, volunteering for people, 
their heating bills are going to be doubling this year, and that is 
going to take money away from the ability to help people.
  An interesting thing, going back to chemicals, which people just do 
not realize. Chemicals and plastics are used in 96 percent of all U.S. 
manufactured goods including computers, cars, clothing and more. Since 
1998, the chemical industry has warned repeatedly that the U.S. is 
facing a natural gas crisis. And what have we done about it?
  I have been talking to the chemical companies for 5 years. They came 
to my office. They do not reside near me; they are not in my district. 
And I said to them, Why did you come to me? This was 3, 4 years ago. 
And they said, Well, someone said you were interested in the natural 
gas issue and you were stating that you saw natural gas as a problem.
  And I did many years ago. I attended breakfasts put on by the Edison 
Institute for Electricity. They kept showing this huge amount of 
natural gas that was going to be consumed for a 12-to-15-year period to 
make electricity until something else could take its place.
  And then I went to a breakfast briefing in the Senate and the speaker 
was Daniel Yergin, who wrote the book ``The Prize'' on oil, and he 
stated that this huge use and commitment of natural gas for electric 
generation, if it was not coupled with the opening up of reserves in 
this country in places we have not been allowed to drill, it would 
cause an escalation of prices. It would take a few years. And folks 
were here.
  I did not expect gas to be $14.50 this year. Many of us on the 
committee were talking that, you know, as it was $7, $8 and bumping 
around $9, approaching the fall that we would probably see $10 or $11 
gas this winter. Well, when Katrina came and shut off some supply, we 
were clear up to $14.50, an unheard-of price, from $2 to $14.50.
  If milk was that kind of an increase, we would have $28-a-gallon 
milk. Would we not be dealing with that? I think we would.
  As I said earlier here, since 1998, the chemical industry has warned 
repeatedly that the U.S. is facing a natural gas crisis. Now the impact 
is being felt by all Americans. With winter fast approaching, the 
government warns that home owners who rely on natural gas for heat, 
about 52 percent of the Nation's households can expect at a minimum a 
48 percent increase, and in some parts of the country, a 70 to 80 
percent increase.
  We, in industry, have been feeling the pressure of high-priced 
natural gas for years and have done everything we could to remain 
globally competitive. For example, Dow has improved its own energy 
efficiency by 42 percent in the last 15 years. Since 2002, we have 
raised product prices more than 50 percent, shut down 23 inefficient 
plants in North America and shifted some production overseas to regions 
of the world where energy prices are lower. So there is no doubt that 
our company and our industry will continue to grow and thrive. It is 
simply a question of where.
  Now, I do not know how clear they have to say it before this Congress 
decides to do something about it. We have been warned by industry after 
industry after industry that these current natural gas prices will 
prohibit them from being profitable and competitive in this country; 
and if that is not a clear message, I do not know what it is.
  I urge my colleagues, I urge this administration, I urge the States 
of Florida and California to become a part of the solution to get away 
from the old rhetoric that natural gas is a dirty commodity. Natural 
gas is the clean fuel. Natural gas is the fuel that can bring us clean 
air attainment in our cities if we use it in transportation. It is the 
bridge that will get us to where $60 oil is going to change a lot.
  A lot of things are going to be competitive. A lot of things are 
going to work. You are going to see increases in all kinds of 
alternatives, but it is going to be slow and gradual. There is no quick 
fix. There is no silver bullet.
  So I am urging the Members of this Congress, I am urging this 
administration, I am urging the governments of California and Florida 
prospectively, because they have been the opponents; they are the ones 
who speak out and say, We must stop this.
  A natural gas producing well on our outer continental coast is not an 
environmental hazard. It is the future of America. It is what will make 
us competitive. It will make our farmers profitable again. It will make 
our chemical companies want to stay here and grow here.
  They are going to grow. They just stated that. They are going to 
grow. They are going to prosper somewhere. But will our chemicals in 
our hardware stores and our supermarkets be American-made? They are 
today. But will they be in the future?
  Will our farmers be using fertilizer from foreign countries? Some of 
them are today. In a very short period of time, they will all be using 
fertilizer from foreign countries because the gas prices of today just 
do not make it affordable to produce fertilizer, chemicals, polymers, 
plastic, steel, aluminum in this country.
  I have been joined by the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. King) who 
requested this hour, who had other duties take him away, and I would 
like to welcome him to join me.
  Mr. KING of Iowa. I appreciate the gentleman picking up this 
responsibility that actually was mine. And as you know, even though the 
scheduling around this city does not reflect that you cannot be in two 
places at one time, in fact, we can only be in one place at a time.
  One would think that with all the work that you have done on the 
natural gas situation here, the need all across this country, that 
sometimes you are in two places at one time with the media that we have 
today. And it takes that kind of a voice.
  I want to lend my voice in support of the work that you have done, 
and I am glad that you stepped up to take the lead. I know it takes a 
lot of commitment and it takes a lot of research. It takes a lot of 
background and it costs a little sleep from time to time and a lot of 
energy.
  So that is what we are after here is energy in this country, and I 
want to see if I can add a little bit different perspective to this 
energy issue.
  Of course, we talked about fertilizer costs and we talked about the 
cost for manufacturing, the cost of heating homes and the list goes on 
and on. But I want to emphasize that Pennsylvania and Iowa run across 
about the same latitude. You can draw a line of latitude that will 
intersect both States, and we are tied together for a lot of other 
reasons. You are kind of the eastern end of the corn belt and we are 
kind of the heart of the corn belt where I am.
  But anybody that raises a crop uses nitrogen fertilizer. And if you 
are raising corn you are probably going to use more nitrogen fertilizer 
than any other crop. And 90 percent of the cost of that nitrogen 
fertilizer is the cost of natural gas. And we have seen in the last few 
years the price of natural gas go up 400 percent here in the United 
States. That means the cost of your nitrogen fertilizer goes up 90 
percent of 400 percent. And that would be 360 percent increase

[[Page 25357]]

in nitrogen fertilizer cost, just to do the quick math.
  Now it is not just the cost of that. And of course we are seeing our 
grain prices are not showing an increase. And so the overhead goes up 
and up, and the margin gets narrower and narrower, and the producers, I 
will say our corn producers, have to figure out a way to increase their 
yields to compensate for this.
  They do that. Of course, the landlord then sees that and raises the 
rent. It is a vicious circle that we are all involved in. It is free 
enterprise, I know. But a nation has to have a solid and sound natural 
gas and energy policy, and you cannot just wake up some morning and 
say, Gee, I wish I would have done this different 30 years ago, throw a 
switch and fix it. This is a long-term, down-range plan that we have to 
have; and we are paying a price for not acting for years and years. In 
fact, for a generation we have not been nearly aggressive enough in 
opening up the energy supplies here in the United States.
  And we can go down on this argument, this argument that says, Well, 
gee, if we would just conserve more energy, if we would drive cars that 
get 30 miles to the gallon instead of 26 miles to the gallon or even 40 
miles to the gallon, if we would use alternative energy sources and 
renewable energy sources, we can do that and we should do many of those 
things. I will not subscribe to all of those things. In fact, I will 
tell you that I support the expanded use of nuclear for electrical 
power. It is the safest and cleanest and the cheapest that we can 
produce. And the record in this country establishes that.
  But that is one part of it, and we are not likely to be able to build 
more hydroelectric so that we can generate more electricity with just 
the gravity of water flowing through there. Because of environmental 
barriers people want to take out dams rather than let us build them.
  And so coal is another difficulty. We had a little problem with air 
quality. We have done pretty well with that. But you cannot do 
everything with coal. And by the way, it takes, you have got to haul 
coal sometimes a long way. And I know that there is coal that is 
trained from Wyoming on down to my area in western Iowa. That is a long 
way to haul the coal.
  Now, but we need gas for a lot of reasons. We need to heat our 
houses, we need it for our businesses and we need it for our 
fertilizer. And by the way, you take a fall. Now this is a good fall, 
and there was not a lot of grain dried. If you have a wet fall, you 
will dry a lot of grain. And we will use not really exactly natural 
gas, but we will use LP. And the difference is this, that the LP comes 
out sometimes from often the same hole as the natural gas and you use a 
gas separator in there. The natural gas is the methane, and the LP is 
mostly propane, but it also can have butane in it, so you use the gas 
separator.
  Seventy-eight percent of the LP that we use to dry our grain comes 
right out of the natural gas well; 22 percent then is stripped out in 
the crude oil processing and the refinement process when you are making 
gas and diesel fuel and oil you get the balance of that LP out of 
there, merge that together, pipeline that up on LP to the Midwest and 
we put that in to dry our grain in the fall and to heat our houses 
outside and out in the countryside where we are we do not have natural 
gas connected to us.
  All those things are tied together. It comes out of the same hole. 
The cost of LP is linked to the cost of natural gas. Energy is all part 
of the whole equation, but there is a difference in natural gas energy 
because it is not a portable energy that is easy to put on a ship and 
bring it here, because by the time you compress it and liquify it, 
bring it here and convert it back to gas it costs money and costs time 
to do that, and we have got limited capacity.
  We are looking to build a couple more liquefied natural gas plants 
refining plants to convert from liquid into gas again. It takes time to 
do that. But we have a tremendous supply of natural gas on the Outer 
Continental Shelf in the United States. And God bless Ronald Reagan for 
drawing that dotted line out there at 200 miles offshore in the United 
States. I believe that was in about 1983. When he did that he opened up 
a tremendous amount for energy resources for the United States, not 
just natural gas, other minerals out there too that we have not even 
found yet, plus a lot of crude oil in the same areas where you will 
find natural gas in many cases. But that 200-mile limit that Reagan 
defined for us is a limit that lets us have an almost unlimited supply 
of natural gas.
  Now, I will give you some examples here on how that works. The North 
Slope of Alaska, where we went up there in 1972 to open that area up 
and drill for oil on the North Slope of Alaska, where we had to build 
the pipeline from up there down to Valdez in order to put that oil on 
tankers to get it down here to the lower 48 States so we could market 
it.
  But the provision was not in place at that time to build a natural 
gas pipeline because why would you pipe natural gas down to Valdez to 
compress it into liquid, put it on a ship, send it down to California, 
turn it back into a gas when you had a countryside that had all this 
natural gas in it, natural gas that was probably less than 2 bucks back 
there in 1972.
  So we did not develop the natural gas, but it is there. The wells are 
drilled. It is available. There is 38 trillion cubic feet of natural 
gas on the North Slope of Alaska sitting up there right now. It needs a 
pipeline down to the Lower 48. It is over 4,700 miles from Prudhoe Bay, 
mile post zero on the Alaska pipeline on down to Kansas City if you 
want to pick a place in the middle of the country, over 4,700 miles.
  If you go the other way and go south, where is there a lot of gas 
south? Well, we know offshore in Louisiana, offshore on the entire gulf 
coast.
  Go a little farther. Venezuela, there is gas that we are paying 
$14.50 for is $1.60 there. You know that is only 2,700 miles from the 
coast of Venezuela up to Kansas City and it is 4,700 miles from Kansas 
City to Prudhoe Bay and the North Slope of Alaska.
  But it is not just a measure of a pipeline from Alaska to Kansas City 
which, I do support that because I want more energy into the Lower 48 
States for a lot of different ways. But it is not the measure then of 
4,700 miles from Alaska to Kansas City versus Kansas City to Venezuela.
  It is because there is another measure, and that is the measure of 
406 cubic feet of natural gas that is on the Outer Continental Shelf 
that is right there next to already processing plants, pipelines, drill 
rigs. We have the network all there. All we need to do is expand that 
drilling.
  This country needs it. And these Americans deserve it. We need to 
drive this $14.50 price down. We have got to cut it by half at least. 
We can do it if we can open 406 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
  Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, I guess I want to conclude 
with the following, that there is no one who has a good argument that 
we do not need to open a supply of natural gas. There are those who 
think there are other ways to do it, that LNG is the big answer. I do 
not think that is the big answer. It can be a help. But we what we 
really need to do, the natural gas supply that is the most readily 
available to population centers of this country is the Outer 
Continental Shelf.
  All leading nations produce there, and they have clean beaches. They 
have great tourism. It does not have to be a detriment. And I urge 
those from Florida and California who keep decrying that this is going 
to be the demise of their beaches and their tourism to show me the 
facts. Do not give me rhetoric. Do not make brash statements. Give me 
the facts of where a natural gas producing well has polluted a beach.
  I am asking Florida and California, who are huge consumers of natural 
gas, to join with us and be a part of the solution. This is a problem 
facing America. We cannot afford to have two States holding up the 
energy policy of this country who are the largest consumers of natural 
gas in enormous amounts per capita compared to other States, who use 
most of their electricity that is made with natural gas.

[[Page 25358]]

And I urge them to come to the table as part of the solution. Show me 
where natural gas wells have polluted the beach, and I will be there.
  I have had no one take me up on that offer. Natural gas wells or 
natural gas flowing out of steel pipe into a collection system into our 
homes, into our factories. Natural gas will depend on whether America 
remains a competitive nation. It is so entwined in our economy and our 
lives that we cannot continue to have government curtail the production 
and expand the use.

                          ____________________