[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 150 (2004), Part 7]
[Senate]
[Pages 8791-8792]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                       IRAQI PRISONER RESOLUTION

  Mr. GRAHAM of South Carolina. Mr. President, I would like to take a 
few minutes to discuss the vote that is coming up this afternoon, the 
resolution about the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal.
  No. 1, I would like to compliment Majority Leader Frist and Senator 
Daschle for bringing this matter up, and the committees and those who 
are involved in drafting the resolution, and allowing it to come to the 
floor. I think it is important for the Senate to be on record; but, 
more importantly, that this not just be used or seen as an opportunity 
for politicians to pile on and talk about the story that is hard to 
watch or view, that we are all on the right side here in making sure 
the world understands we condemn this, and it is more about us 
protecting ourselves politically. I think it is a symbolic gesture, but 
much of democracy is symbolism: The idea that an elected body--some say 
the most prestigious deliberative body in the world, and I can 
understand why people would say that about the Senate--would take some 
of its time to have a vote on something that goes to the core of who we 
are as a people.
  As I travel around and listen to constituents about this prisoner 
abuse scandal, a couple of points are reflected back to me.
  No. 1, the people there are probably not nice people; they are 
criminals; maybe terrorists; that other people do worse; let us not be 
so hard on ourselves; and people in a war environment where there is 
much stress sometimes overreact. That is all true. But that is not the 
point. The point is if we use as a standard to govern ourselves the 
shortcomings of a dictatorship, then the big loser is us.
  I spoke at a graduation this weekend. I said never use the standard 
of someone else's failures to be your benchmark as to how you would 
like to live your life.
  We know how bad people treat good people and others. We have seen it 
in history for thousands of years. It was a real part of Saddam 
Hussein's regime.
  The question is, Can we prove to the world and ourselves that good 
people treat bad people differently? Not only can we, I think we must.
  There are a lot of Iraqis who are probably not shocked by this 
prisoner abuse scandal nearly as much as we are. In their world, this 
is pretty much the way you do business. A lot worse happened in that 
prison under Saddam Hussein. But what happened there that we know about 
so far is very hard for Americans to understand and digest. That is the 
good thing. The fact a lot of Iraqis are willing to accept that this is 
usual is not a good thing.
  What will have to occur for Iraq to make it as a functioning 
democracy is people are going to have to change what to expect from 
their leaders and their government and those in authority.
  My question to our Nation is, If we show anything short of disgust 
and condemnation, would we not be reinforcing to those already 
disheartened Iraqis that you should not have high expectations? Even 
the Americans, whom we have all heard about and who tout themselves as 
the good guy, understand how these things can happen.
  This resolution is a small step forward to prove to the Iraqi people 
and others that you should have high expectations of those who are in 
your government--those who are given the authority to imprison, to make 
arrests and detain. If you start having those high expectations, you 
will be amazed at how things in Iraq change for the better.
  I have been waiting for a demonstration to occur in Iraq against the 
activities that led to the death of the four contractors. I am fully 
aware if you join us to stabilize Iraq, to be a judge, or a prosecutor, 
or a police chief or the army--any symbol of authority that would bring 
about a transfer of democracy in Iraq--the insurgents are likely to 
come after you and your family.
  It is easy for us to talk about demonstrating and showing disgust 
when we are not threatened. But in the history of our Nation, people 
have put their lives at risk to make us better. In my lifetime, people 
such as Dr. Martin Luther King risked their lives to try to make life 
better for us all. During the civil rights demonstrations of the 1950s 
and 1960s, the photos of police dogs attacking African-American men and 
women shocked us all and it made what segregation is about real.
  I hope these photos will shock us and make us understand when we fail 
as a people, when our institutions fail, it is OK to apologize. It 
doesn't make you smaller; it actually makes you larger. It is OK to 
say, I am sorry. There is a moral imperative, that when we assess 
accountability we do not take anybody off the list because of their 
rank or their status.
  This resolution today is a small step forward. There will be many 
more steps to be taken to overcome this prisoner abuse scandal and to 
transform Iraq into a functioning democracy. But there are voices in 
our country which are vilifying and undercutting the effort.
  I appeared on a show this Sunday with former NATO Commander General 
Wesley Clark, a man who served his country in a variety of roles and 
honorably served in Vietnam and was wounded. But he said something that 
disturbed me. It took a while for me to realize the depth of the 
statement. When asked, Will Iraq be democratic, or the effort to 
transform Iraq be successful, he said, Less than 50. I will give 2-to-1 
odds that this operation ends in a catastrophe, for a lack of a better 
word paraphrasing him. It is not good, I believe, to bet against 
ourselves, or to put 2-to-1 odds on the ending. People will take that 
wrong and think they are winning when they are really not. Whether Iraq 
becomes a functioning democracy or something akin to it is not only 
possible, it is a must.
  There will never be a Mideast without turmoil and hatred until some 
countries in that region embrace the idea that you can worship God more 
than one way, that there is a role for women, a meaningful role for 
women, and democracy ensures the two things I have mentioned. All 
people can participate and one's faith is expressed in many ways in a 
democracy. Not only is Iraq's transformation to a democracy a 
worthwhile objective, I think we have a moral imperative to accomplish 
that mission because it goes to the sense of whether we will ever win 
the war on terror. For every democracy that is formed in the Mideast, 
there is one less place for Osama bin Laden and his henchmen to be able 
to thrive; they know that. That is why they are fighting so hard and so 
fiercely. The people indigenous to Iraq who do not want a democracy 
understand their past association with Saddam Hussein will not be 
rewarded. They want it their way and no other way. They use this 
opportunity to attack us and run America and other people out as a way 
to create a vacuum which they will fill.
  If that occurs and we fail in Iraq, the big loser will be the next 
generation of freedom-loving people all over the world. The 
international community is not only essential to transforming Iraq, it 
must take an active part sooner rather than later.
  History tells us sometimes the international community is more 
worried

[[Page 8792]]

about appeasing the problem than solving the problem. Winston Churchill 
virtually stood alone because so many people before him believed Hitler 
would be OK if you gave him just one more country. People like Hitler 
are never OK with just a little more. They want all you have and then 
some.
  Osama bin Laden will never be appeased by having part of Iraq or all 
of it. People who think the way he does cannot be dealt with in terms 
that we understand and live by. That is not to say we need to throw our 
law and our values overboard. We need to understand the only thing that 
will control the Osama bin Ladens of the world is the same thing that 
controlled the Hitlers of the world: Good men and women from diverse 
backgrounds from all over the world coming together and saying, We will 
fight you. We will fight for freedom of religion, diversity in life. If 
you want to fight, that is the only way this can be resolved, you will 
get a fight.
  The international community needs to help us yesterday. President 
Bush is right: a democratic Iraq is necessary to transform the Middle 
East as a starting point. President Bush is right: Iraq is a frontline 
effort in the war on terror. It is a place in the past where terrorists 
felt at home; a place in the past with a leader, Saddam Hussein, who 
fueled money to the Middle East to reward those who wanted to destroy 
the State of Israel and prevent a two-state solution between Palestine 
and Israel.
  This resolution could not come at a better time. But it is only a 
small first step of many more steps to come. My bet is that it is not 2 
to 1, it is 100 percent; that if Americans can come together and stop 
the partisan fighting over this war, having differences of opinion is 
absolutely appropriate, and the only way a free people can live.
  The Iraqi prison abuse scandal is an opportunity for America to come 
together. Regardless of whether you are Republican or Democrat, we see 
this problem the same. If we work together, we can win. We will work, I 
am 100-percent certain of that. The only person who can defeat us is 
ourselves.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Utah.
  Mr. HATCH. What is the parliamentary situation?
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Morning business with a 10-minute time limit.

                          ____________________