[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 150 (2004), Part 6]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages 7080-7081]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




             TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT: A LEGACY FOR USERS

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                             HON. JOE BACA

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, April 1, 2004

       The House in Committee of the Whole House on the State of 
     the Union had under consideration the bill (H.R. 3550) to 
     authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety 
     programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes.
  Mr. BACA. Mr. Chairman, I reluctantly support this transportation 
reauthorization.
  While this bill includes important projects for my district, it does 
not adequately fund our nation's transportation priorities.
  A population boom in the Inland Empire has created a desperate need 
for federal funding.
  Commuters and emergency vehicles must be able to access our highways 
safely and efficiently.
  In name of homeland security and economic vitality we, in the Inland 
Empire, must improve our infrastructure.
  The average commute time in our district is 30 minutes to an hour. 
This is outrageous for an exurb community.
  Last year my district grew by approximately 60,000 people.
  Sixth in the nation for population growth.
  These are thousands of Californians that deserve better investments 
in transportation infrastructure to correspond with the population 
growth.
  I am not happy that this legislation will further condemn 
Californians to subsidize the transportation spending of other states.
  I am not happy that this administration believes that deficit 
spending for millionaire tax cuts is necessary, but federal spending 
for job-creating transportation improvements is wasteful.
  By limiting funds well below the Senate highway bill, Republicans are 
missing a prime opportunity to begin job creation and recover some of 3 
million private-sector jobs lost under the Bush Administration.
  That is why I will enthusiastically support the Davis amendment. This 
alternative increases the funding in the bill to the Senate-passed 
level of $318 billion.
  This would create about 1.8 million more jobs than the House GOP 
leadership bill without adding to the deficit.

[[Page 7081]]

  This Democratic amendment would create about 1.8 million more jobs 
and $235 billion more economic activity than the House GOP leadership 
bill without adding to the deficit.
  The increase for highway and public transit over the House bill is 
fully paid for by cracking down on abusive corporate tax shelters and 
companies that move off-shore to avoid paying U.S. taxes.
  The Senate overwhelmingly passed a $318 billion compromise measure by 
a vote of 76 to 21 on February 12.
  Mr. Chairman, that is why I reluctantly support the reauthorization, 
but ask my colleagues to please enthusiastically support the Davis 
amendment to create jobs, fix our roads, and invest in the future.

                          ____________________