[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 150 (2004), Part 5]
[Senate]
[Pages 6934-6935]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                                OAK HILL

  Mr. DeWINE. Mr. President, I will take a few minutes today to report 
on the very shocking and troubling situation right here in our Nation's 
Capitol. I am speaking of the situation of the District of Columbia's 
juvenile detention center known as Oak Hill.
  Right before the Easter recess I visited the center. Also, as 
chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on the District of 
Columbia, I held a hearing to review the operations of Oak Hill. 
Actually we held the hearing first. As a result of that hearing, I then 
made a point to personally visit Oak Hill. Based on what I saw at this 
juvenile facility and the testimony we heard at a hearing, it is clear 
to me Oak Hill is not meeting the needs of the children it serves, that 
the conditions there are abysmal to say the least, and this place 
simply needs to be shut down once and for all.
  At our hearing the inspector general for the District of Columbia 
released a comprehensive report about the situation at Oak Hill. Let me 
mention some of the more egregious deficiencies outlined in that 
report. First, illegal drugs such as marijuana and PCP were regularly 
smuggled into Oak Hill in the past. In some cases, youth correction 
officers in the past were the source of some of the illegal substances. 
That is a rather shocking thought, that the correctional officers were 
the sources of some of these illegal drugs actually coming into this 
juvenile detention facility. Substance abuse treatment contractors 
actually refused to renew contracts because Oak Hill was unable to stop 
the influx of drugs.
  They also found some youths entering Oak Hill drug free actually 
started taking drugs once they were inside the facility because they 
had easy access to drugs there.
  They also found the Youth Services Administration, which runs Oak 
Hill, wasted millions of dollars on contractors who did not provide any 
meaningful services or deliverables.
  During this hearing Senator Landrieu and I held, the director of the 
Public Defender Service of the District of Columbia testified the Youth 
Services Administration has failed to protect youths from harm while 
under its care. For example--this is a very sad story--last year a 12-
year-old held at Oak Hill overnight, not accused of any crime, was 
placed in a room with two other children. This 12-year-old was sexually 
assaulted by one of the other youths.
  Several months later a 13-year-old was arrested and held at Oak Hill 
waiting for shelter space to be available. The 13-year-old was placed 
in a room with the same child who had committed the sexual assault 
before on the 12-year-old. Not surprisingly, another sexual incident 
occurred and there was another victim; this sexual predator had another 
victim.
  Furthermore, I understand this practice of assigning more than one 
child to a room has led to the commingling of status offenders, kids 
who are runaways or truants--commingling them with delinquent youth as 
well as detained committed youths. For example, these practices led to 
a child detained as a truant and a runaway being housed in the same 
room as a youth detained on charges of negligent homicide. That simply 
is not right. It is not good practice. It is not permitted and should 
not have been allowed. Amazingly, these are only the latest in a long 
list of deficiencies with the Youth Services Administration that 
stretches back at least 19 years. Indeed, it was 19 years ago this 
month the Public Defender Service filed a complaint against the 
District for failure to protect youth under its custody. Year after 
year, the city has fallen short of the court's ``Jerry M. Decree,'' 
which is the name of the court decree, and is now facing the prospect 
of being taken over by a court receiver. Equally amazing, some 
estimates are it costs nearly $90,000 a year to house a child at Oak 
Hill. But even more astounding than that is when I visited this 
facility a little over a week ago and asked the interim administrator 
and the interim special counsel from the Youth Services Administration 
who gave me the tour how much it cost to house a child there, they 
simply could not give me an answer. Their answer was they did not break 
out how much it cost to run Oak Hill from a total cost of the whole 
Youth Services Administration.
  I find that to be astounding frankly. They did not know. They could 
not give me a breakout so they couldn't tell us what Oak Hill cost to 
run a year and therefore obviously they couldn't tell us whether the 
$90,000-a-year figure, which is what we believe it costs to house a 
child there for a year, is an accurate figure.
  I visited many youth detention facilities in Ohio in my public 
career. I was Lieutenant Governor of the State of Ohio and had the 
opportunity to visit, I think, all of our juvenile facilities during 
the 4 years when I was Lieutenant Governor. I was a county prosecuting 
attorney. I learned a lot about these types of centers. I know what 
they do well and what they do not do well. I can tell you with 
certainty there are several things they are not doing very well at Oak 
Hill right now.
  The buildings are decrepit. They are falling apart. Important 
services such as substance abuse treatment programs are certainly 
piecemeal at best. Children who are detained and awaiting trial are 
commingled with those who are committed offenders. In fact, I

[[Page 6935]]

learned one girl who was committed merely because she is a truant has 
been housed with committed delinquents since October. This, I 
understand, is in violation of the D.C. Code.
  What is particularly troubling is what happens sometimes is the 
teenagers who are in foster care or group homes run away because they 
are being victimized by other youths in the same home or they run away 
for other reasons. Once these children run away or are truant from 
school, for example, they are labeled delinquents and they are often 
picked up and sent to Oak Hill. So neglected youths who are failed by a 
broken foster care system now find themselves locked up and labeled 
juvenile delinquents and then are commingled in Oak Hill with dangerous 
delinquents at a place where they are currently able to get ready 
access to illicit drugs. What a horrible situation.
  The Federal Government contributes about $15 million annually to the 
District's Youth Services Administration, which administers Oak Hill. 
The YSA would be eligible for even more Federal funding if it had a 
qualified drug treatment program in place. A large number of the 
children at Oak Hill have a substance abuse problem. That should not 
surprise us. It is what I would expect. What I did not expect is to go 
to Oak Hill and find very little, if any, substance abuse treatment in 
place.
  In all fairness, when we went out there we were told substance abuse 
treatment was on the way, that a program was going to be started. But 
there was not much going on at all when we were there and there was a 
promise of something happening in the future. But that is what it was, 
a promise.
  Clearly, Congress has a vested interest in assuring the proper use of 
the money we provide. We have, more importantly, a moral interest in 
ensuring the proper treatment of youths at Oak Hill.
  After touring the facility and after hearing from expert witnesses 
and after reading the November 6, 2001, recommendation of the Blue 
Ribbon Commission on Youth Safety and Juvenile Justice Reform in the 
District, I believe Oak Hill should be closed. The children of the 
District of Columbia deserve better. The communities to which these 
youths will one day be returned deserve better. It is our duty to work 
hard to rehabilitate these young offenders who have, frankly, often 
been failed by their parents and, yes, overlooked by their communities.
  Not only do I recommend that Oak Hill be demolished, but I expect to 
see the Mayor develop a comprehensive plan afterward so the problems at 
Oak Hill are not repeated elsewhere. Just this past Thursday, Judge 
Dixon of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia found that the 
District is in contempt of court regarding Oak Hill having violated 
numerous provisions of the ``Jerry M. Decree.'' Because of this 
contempt finding, the city will be fined $1,000 per day and may be 
subject to additional sanctions.
  It is our hope these sanctions and this court order will push the 
city towards addressing the intractable problems at Oak Hill. As I have 
already stated, trying to fix this broken facility is, in my opinion, a 
waste of time and a waste of money and is futile. We have waited 19 
years for improvements. Yet no one has stepped up to take the lead. If 
no one does, the problems at Oak Hill will continue.
  The blue ribbon commission recommended that Oak Hill be shut down. 
Judges have recommended that it be shut down. And now it is time for 
the District to step to the plate, take the lead, and shut this place 
down once and for all.
  Let me make one final comment in conclusion. When I was the Governor 
of Ohio, I visited every juvenile facility and every adult facility in 
Ohio. I don't pretend to be an expert in this area, but I think I know 
something about it. What has happened at Oak Hill over the last few 
years is that the District knows the place eventually is going to be 
closed. So every problem they see, they look at it and they say, Well, 
there is no reason to put money into fixing this problem or to fix that 
problem. So it keeps getting worse and worse. It is sort of like a 
house you know you are going to bulldoze down in a few months, and you 
are not going to fix anything. Yet the District, for some inexplicable 
reason, does not have the will to shut this place down--to pull the 
plug and say enough is enough.
  After touring this facility, I am saying enough is enough. It is not 
fair to the kids who are being sent out there. It is not fair to the 
employees who have to work out there. And it is not fair to the 
taxpayers to continue to put money into this facility. This facility 
has to be shut down. The District has to move forward. It is in the 
best interests of the children of the District of Columbia to do so.
  I thank the Chair. I yield the floor.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Utah.
  Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be permitted 
to speak for as long as I need.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so 
ordered.

                          ____________________