[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 149 (2003), Part 3]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages 4120-4121]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




           THE ARTISTS' CONTRIBUTION TO AMERICAN HERITAGE ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. AMO HOUGHTON

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, February 13, 2003

  Mr. HOUGHTON. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to join my colleague from 
Maryland, Mr. Cardin, together with a bipartisan group of our 
colleagues, in introducing the ``Artists' Contribution to American 
Heritage Act of 2003.'' The bill would alleviate an unfairness in the 
tax law as it applies to charitable donations of property by the 
taxpayer/creator and significantly enhance the ability of museums and 
public libraries to acquire important original works by artists, 
writers and composers, and ensure the preservation of these works for 
future generations. The proposed legislation is the same as we 
introduced in the 106th and 107th Congresses, except for advancing the 
effective date by a year.
  Since 1969, the law has provided that the creator of the artistic 
property is only allowed

[[Page 4121]]

a charitable deduction equal to the cost of materials that went into 
the property. For example, an established artist who donates a painting 
to the local museum is allowed a deduction for the cost of the canvas, 
brushes and paint, etc. used to produce the painting. Of course, these 
amounts are de minimus. There is no real tax incentive to contribute 
such works of art for the public to enjoy. In fact, the tax law works 
in the other direction. It makes more financial sense to the creator to 
sell his or her work. If a collector or art buff buys a painting that 
appreciates over time, because the artist becomes well established or 
was a known and collected artist when the painting was purchased, the 
collector is allowed a deduction for fair market value when the 
painting is contributed to the local museum. This is the fairness 
issue.
  Before 1969, the artists/taxpayers received the same treatment--the 
deduction was based on fair market value. The law was changed, 
primarily because of the perception that some taxpayers were taking 
advantage of the law through less than accurate valuations of their 
charitable gifts. After the law was changed in 1969, gifts of donor 
generated art work (paintings, manuscripts, compositions, artistic and 
historically significant correspondence and papers) to qualifying 
charitable organizations and governmental entities dropped 
significantly. Creators were more likely to sell their works than to 
contribute them. The situation has not improved over the years.
  There have been significant changes in the valuation process since 
1969. All taxpayers making charitable contributions of art work (other 
than donor generated art work) are required to: (a) provide and/or 
retain relevant information as to the value of the gift, (b) provide 
appraisals by qualified appraisers or, in some cases, (c) subject them 
to review by the IRS's Art Advisory Panel, depending on the dollar 
amount of the contribution. These changes would apply to creator-
donated property under our proposal.
  In addition to the valuation safeguards already in the law, our 
proposal would add additional protections to prevent abuse. These 
include the following: (a) limiting the value of the deduction to the 
amount of income the creator received from similar property and/or 
similar activities, (b) providing that the deduction can only be 
claimed in the year of contribution, i.e. the carry over rules do not 
apply, (c) limiting the deduction to property created at least 18 
months before the contribution, (d) limiting the deduction to gifts 
related to the purpose of the institution which receives it, and (e) 
excluding contributions of property (letters, memos, etc.) created by 
taxpayers in their role as employees or officers of an organization.
  The benefit to the nation when artists are encouraged to contribute 
their work during their lifetime cannot be overemphasized. It allows 
the public, historians, scholars and others to learn from the artist 
his/her aesthetic aims for the work; how it was intended to be 
displayed, performed or interpreted; and what influences affected the 
artist.
  Our proposal represents an important step in providing some tax 
incentive, with needed safeguards, for the creators and moves toward 
putting them on the same footing as collectors who contribute similar 
property. It could make the difference in a decision by the creator/
donor to contribute some of their created work to a museum or public 
library. That way important works are preserved and we all benefit. We 
urge our colleagues to join us in cosponsoring this legislation.

                          ____________________