[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 148 (2002), Part 4]
[House]
[Page 4736]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]




                              {time}  1030
           PASSAGE OF H.R. 476, CHILD CUSTODY PROTECTION ACT

  (Mr. SHUSTER asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 476, the 
Child Custody Protection Act. H.R. 476 has two important functions. 
First, it works to make sure that valid parental notification laws will 
not be circumvented. Second, it secures the right of a parent to be 
involved in medical decisions regarding their minor daughters.
  I think it is important to note that even abortion rights advocates, 
such as Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation, all 
encourage minors to consult their parents before having an abortion. 
Not only can a parent provide the emotional and physical support that 
their daughter will need, but a parent also knows their daughter's 
medical history.
  There is also widespread support for parental notification among the 
American people. A 1998 CBS New York Times poll found that 78 percent 
of those polled favored requiring parental notification.
  I come from a State that requires parental notification. Yet, out-of-
State clinics try to circumvent this law. It is not uncommon practice 
for clinics in New Jersey, a State without parental notification law, 
to advertise in Pennsylvania phone books. These clinics often go as far 
as to highlight the fact that they will perform an abortion without 
parental notification.
  The passage of H.R. 476 effectively puts an end to this despicable 
practice. I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.

                          ____________________