[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 147 (2001), Part 5]
[Senate]
[Pages 6692-6693]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]



             THE BUDGET RESOLUTION AND UNINSURED AMERICANS

  Mr. SMITH of Oregon. Madam President, I have come to this Chamber in 
the past to express my frustration when things have not seemed to be 
proceeding and we seemed to have been stuck in gridlock. Today is a 
very real exception to that feeling. I rejoice that we have a budget 
agreement, and that we are working on education reform that puts 
serious resources behind serious reform in our educational system.
  I am here as well to thank the leaders of the conference committee on 
the Budget, specifically Senator Domenici and Senator Lott on our side, 
and others in the House and Senate who have, I am told, preserved the 
one thing I wanted most in this budget, which was a $28 billion 
authorization for 3 years to expand health care to the uninsured.
  I came to this issue not this year, but from the first year I entered 
public life as an Oregon State senator and won membership on our health 
care committee. I was not around when we created the Oregon Health 
Plan, but I did play a role in obtaining funding for it. The Oregon's 
Medicaid program, known as the Oregon Health Plan, has dramatically 
reduced the number of the working uninsured in the State of Oregon.
  We have a tradition in our State of trying to take care of those who 
cannot take care of themselves. I express gratitude to my colleagues on 
the Democrat and Republican side for this budget agreement that will 
help our State and others do just that.
  I believe we need tax reduction and tax reform. I think we are going 
to do something very significant in our generation with what we will 
likely adopt very soon in this body and the other, and that President 
Bush will sign. It will put real dollars into the pockets of working 
Americans.
  But I must say how grateful I am that this budget item has been 
preserved--$28 billion for the uninsured--because while we cut taxes 
for Americans, it is also appropriate that we care for those who cannot 
care for themselves.

[[Page 6693]]

  Madam President, I ask unanimous consent an editorial from the 
Washington Post of this morning entitled ``Timeout for the Uninsured'' 
be printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in 
the Record, as follows:

                [From the Washington Post, May 2, 2001]

                       Timeout for the Uninsured

       House conferees have been fighting with their Senate 
     counterparts to reduce the spending levels in the 
     congressional budget resolution. No doubt some cuts can be 
     made in the Senate totals without the country's suffering 
     harm. But at least one relatively minor Senate proposal 
     deserves to remain.
       Oregon Sens. Gordon Smith and Ron Wyden won inclusion in 
     the budget of an additional $28 billion over three years to 
     reduce the number of Americans without health insurance. The 
     money would mainly be spent on lower-income people. Exactly 
     how would be up to the authorizing committees, but an add-on 
     of some kind to Medicaid and/or the children's health 
     insurance program that Congress enacted several years ago 
     seems most likely. The modest expansion would hardly solve 
     the un-insurance problem, but it would push in the right 
     direction.
       About a seventh of the population remains uninsured. Most 
     are poor or near poor. They lack insurance mainly because 
     they can't afford it. The administration has proposed a tax 
     credit to help those whose employers don't offer insurance. 
     But the credit would cover only part of the cost of an 
     average policy, and most uninsured families still would find 
     such a policy beyond their means. Some people think the 
     industry might respond by offering only partial policies, but 
     it's not clear that would be a good result, either.
       The administration proposal has some interesting features 
     and would do limited good, but limited is the operative word. 
     The spending programs for the lower-income uninsured have 
     shown themselves to be efficient ways of increasing coverage. 
     Whatever the fate of the tax credit, they should be expanded. 
     Much attention has lately been paid to the health care 
     problems of the already insured. The elderly lack a drug 
     benefit; people enrolled in managed care complain that care 
     is sometimes sacrificed to cost. But at least these people 
     have insurance. More than 40 million don't. The budget 
     argument this year has been mainly about how large a tax cut 
     to give the better-off. What about a timeout to pay a little 
     heed to those who can't afford to get sick?

  Mr. SMITH of Oregon. The Washington Post editorial states:

       House conferees have been fighting with their Senate 
     counterparts to reduce the spending levels in the 
     congressional budget resolution. No doubt some cuts can be 
     made in the Senate totals without the country's suffering 
     harm. But at least one relatively minor Senate proposal 
     deserves to remain.

  They are referring to this $28 billion that we can use to reduce the 
ranks of the uninsured. Currently that is about 17 percent of our 
fellow citizens, over 43 million Americans.
  Senator Wyden and I, when we came up with this idea, hoped we could 
cut this number in half. It is now up to the Finance Committee to 
achieve that. They have the money now authorized to accomplish that.
  Good programs do exist for providing health care to the uninsured. 
Medicaid, as we all know, is working. It needs more resources. There is 
also the Children's Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, which has also 
reduced the number of uninsured children in this country.
  One of the things I was most grateful to have been a part of when I 
first came to the Senate was a compromise between Senator Hatch and 
Senator Kennedy for the CHIP program, which became the pivot point for 
the balanced budget agreement. Oregon's Children's Health Insurance 
Assistance Program has enrolled 13,000 children in our State. But there 
are more than 61,000 eligible children without coverage because of the 
limited amount of money budgeted for this purpose. Senator Wyden and I 
hope the Finance Committee will expand this program to include their 
parents.
  What we are doing is providing access to health care for low-income 
Americans. This is the No. 1 bipartisan agenda item we have. We have 
started on that plan and will build on its past successes.
  I believe expanding coverage can be done in a way that will promote 
State flexibility, avoid new bureaucracies, and protect the employer-
based coverage system, while providing a meaningful, affordable benefit 
to millions of Americans.
  Our first component that we will propose to the Finance Committee 
will be to give businesses incentives to make quality health insurance 
more affordable for their low-income workers. Our plan will give 
businesses a tax credit if they chip in more to offer quality health 
care to their low-income employees. Many low-wage employees are working 
hard but are having trouble paying the full amount for health 
insurance.
  Second, our plan will extend Medicaid coverage to more low-income 
Americans. Many low-income adults who cannot afford or are not offered 
health insurance will be eligible for Medicaid coverage. As I 
indicated, we want to expand the CHIP program.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Bunning). The Senator's time has expired.
  Mr. SMITH of Oregon. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent for 1 
more minute.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. SMITH of Oregon. We believe that expanding health insurance to 
millions of hard working low-income Americans will relieve the 
uncertainty and fear many people face, knowing that they are one 
illness away from losing their life savings or their home. It is the 
right thing to do. It is the right time to do it.
  As the editorial in the Washington Post says:

       What about a timeout to pay a little heed to those who 
     can't afford to get sick?

  I thank my colleagues on the budget conference committee for 
preserving this critical line item for the uninsured. I urge all my 
colleagues to vote for it when it comes out of this conference and then 
later when it is crafted into final form by the Finance Committee.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Roberts). The distinguished Senator from 
Massachusetts is recognized.
  Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak as in 
morning business.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________