[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 147 (2001), Part 5]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages 6447-6448]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]



     INTRODUCTION OF THE REWARDING PERFORMANCE IN COMPENSATION ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. CASS BALLENGER

                           of north carolina

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, April 26, 2001

  Mr. BALLENGER. Mr. Speaker, today, I am reintroducing the ``The 
Rewarding Performance in Compensation Act'' which will help workers to 
share, financially, when their efforts help produce gains for their 
company in productivity, sales, fewer injuries, or other aspects of 
performance. The Rewarding Performance in Compensation Act would amend 
the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to specify that an hourly 
employee's regular rate of pay for the purposes of calculating overtime 
would not be affected by additional payments that reward or provide 
incentives to employees who meet productivity, quality, efficiency or 
sales goals. By eliminating disincentives in current law, this 
legislation will encourage employers to reward their employees and make 
it easier for employers to ``share the wealth'' with their employees.
  The pressures of worldwide competition and rapid technological change 
have forced most employers to seek continuous improvement in 
productivity, quality, and other aspects of company performance. 
Employers often seek to encourage and reward employee efforts to 
improve productivity, quality, etc. through what are called 
``gainsharing'' plans--linking additional compensation to measurable 
improvements in company, team, or individual performance. Employees are 
assigned individual

[[Page 6448]]

or group productivity goals and the savings achieved from improved 
productivity, or the gains, are then shared between the company and the 
employees. The payouts are based directly on factors under an 
employee's control, such as productivity or costs, rather than on the 
company's profits. Thus employees directly benefit from improvements 
that they help to produce by increasing their overall compensation.
  Unfortunately, employers who choose to implement such programs for 
their hourly employees can be burdened with unpredictable and complex 
requirements by the FLSA, which clearly did not envision these types of 
``pay based on performance'' plans.
  For example, if a bonus is based on production, performance, or other 
factors, the payment must be divided by the number of hours worked by 
the non-exempt employee during the time period that the bonus is meant 
to cover, and added to the employee's regular hourly pay rate. This 
adjusted hourly rate must then be used to recalculate the employee's 
overtime rate of pay. The employer is then responsible to pay the 
difference between the old overtime pay rate and the new recalculated 
overtime pay rate. For other types of employees, such as executive, 
administrative, or professional employees who are exempt from minimum 
wage and overtime, an employer can easily give financial rewards 
without having to recalculate rates of pay.
  Simply put, this legislation would amend the FLSA to allow employers 
to give nonexempt hourly employees gainsharing, or performance bonuses 
without making employers go through the cost of recalculating hourly 
and overtime pay. This would give hourly non-exempt employees the same 
access to bonuses and gainsharing programs that exempt employees 
receive.
  Performance bonuses and gainsharing programs are a way for employees 
to share in the success of the company they work for. Whether exempt or 
non-exempt, all employees should have the same opportunity to receive 
bonuses for their hard work.

                          ____________________