[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 147 (2001), Part 5]
[Senate]
[Page 6389]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]



                         SENATOR STROM THURMOND

  Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, this morning's Washington Post contained a 
front page story on our distinguished colleague, Senator Strom 
Thurmond.
  I am the Senator in this body who has served longest with Senator 
Thurmond. I served with Senator Thurmond when Senator Thurmond was a 
member of the party on this side of the aisle. So, having served with 
Senator Thurmond all of these long years, I began reading the story, 
thinking how nice it was that the paper would devote time and space to 
take notice of the longest serving U.S. Senator in American history, 
Senator Thurmond, who has cast more than 15,800 votes. He is a man who 
loved his country so much that he gave up his draft exemption status 
during World War II in order to enlist in the U.S. military and take 
part in the invasion of Normandy and the liberation of Europe. I salute 
Senator Thurmond for his patriotism. He didn't have to do that, but he 
did it.
  As I read the story, I was filled with dismay, then revulsion. 
Contrary to my expectation, what I was reading was a demeaning drivel 
filled with denigrating language and insensitive images.
  As I read, I kept asking myself, what is the point of this story? Is 
there any purpose to be served by it?
  This is certainly not a news story. Yet, it is on the front page of a 
major national newspaper--a newspaper that is read around the world 
everyday, a newspaper that is a great newspaper.
  I can see neither a point nor a purpose to the story other than a 
pathetic attempt to demean an outstanding man and a long serving, 
distinguished federal lawmaker.
  Every senior citizen in America ought to be offended by this orgy of 
pejorative blather which aims only to viciously exploit something as 
normal as the human aging process.
  We are all going to be old one day, if we live long enough. We ought 
to be conscious of that fact. We should be conscious of it every day 
regardless of what pursuit we follow in life.
  Is there no decency anymore?
  Is there no respect for anything anymore?
  The people of South Carolina continue to place their confidence and 
their trust in Senator Thurmond. They elected Senator Thurmond to 
represent their State in the U.S. Senate. And they have elected him and 
reelected him many times. That is their judgment to make, and I respect 
their judgment, and so should everybody else.
  The Senate is a collective body of 100 men and women who have been 
elected by the people of their various States to make the Nation's 
laws. We are a unique body. One-thousand, eight hundred and sixty-four 
men and women have served in the Senate since the first day it met in 
1789.
  We are a special body. While we may have our disagreements on this 
floor, I believe that the Members of this body for the most part 
respect each other off the Senate floor as well as on the Senate floor.
  However, midway through the story, the Post journalist quotes a 
Senator who ``agreed to speak candidly only if he was granted 
anonymity.''
  I am speaking candidly today, and I don't do so with anonymity.
  At any rate, the story quotes the unnamed Senator as saying, in 
talking about Senator Thurmond, ``At what point do you draw the line?''
  That is the question I kept asking myself as I read this 
inappropriate, tasteless, cheap-shot piece of journalism: At what point 
do you draw the line?
  That is the very question the Washington Post should have been asking 
before they chose to print their tabloid tripe: At what point do you 
draw the line?
  May I suggest that the real story here is not Senator Thurmond's age. 
The real story should be that he loves this institution so much and 
loves serving the people of South Carolina so much that he, at the age 
of 98, continues to serve and have the courage to carry on, and that he 
loves his country so much that he was willing to set aside his exempt 
status in World War II and participate in that dreadful landing on the 
beaches of Normandy and risk his life, as so many others risked their 
lives. And many of them never returned. Senator Thurmond continues to 
serve and have the courage to carry on, in spite of non-news, deeply 
offensive stories such as the one in today's Washington Post.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Louisiana is recognized.

                          ____________________