[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 146 (2000), Part 8]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page 11361]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]



                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. ZOE LOFGREN

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Monday, June 19, 2000

  Ms. LOFGREN. Mr. Speaker, on Thrusday June 15 I had the privilege to 
attend the high school graduation of my daughter in California and so I 
was unable to cast the following votes during consideration of H.R. 
4578, The Department of Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations 
bill.
  On Rollcall No. 278 (Rule on VA/HUD Approps) I would have voted: 
``No''.


                            Interior Approps

  On Rollcall No. 279 (Nethercutt amendment to Dicks amendment) I would 
have voted: ``no'';
  On Rollcall No. 280 (Hansen amendment to Dicks amendment) I would 
have voted: ``no'';
  On Rollcall No. 281 (Dicks amendment Columbia River Basin) I would 
have voted: ``aye'';
  On Rollcall No. 282 (Stearns amendment to cut NEA funding) I would 
have voted: ``no'';
  On Rollcall No. 283 (Slaughter amendment Re Clean Coal Funding) I 
would have voted: ``aye'';
  On Rollcall No. 284 (Obey motion that the Committee Rise) I would 
have voted: ``aye'';
  On Rollcall No. 285 (Quorum Call);
  On Rollcall No. 286 (Sanders amendment to create a Home Heating Oil 
Reserve) I would have voted: ``aye'';
  On Rollcall No. 287 (Doggett motion that the Committee Rise) I would 
have voted: ``aye'';
  On Rollcall No. 288 (Nethercutt amendment Re national monuments) I 
would have voted: ``no'''';
  On Rollcall No. 289 (Dave Weldon amendment Re Indian Gaming in 
Florida) I would have voted: ``no'';
  On Rollcall No. 290 (Motion to recommit with instructions) I would 
have voted: ``aye'';
  On Rollcall No. 291 (Final Passage Interior Approps--passed 204--172) 
I would have voted: ``no''.

                          ____________________