[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 146 (2000), Part 4]
[Senate]
[Pages 5045-5058]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]



               FISCAL YEAR 2001 BUDGET--H. CON. RES. 290

  On April 7, 2000, the Senate amended and passed H. Con. Res. 290, as 
follows:

       Resolved, That the resolution from the House of 
     Representatives (H. Con. Res. 290) entitled ``Concurrent 
     resolution establishing the congressional budget for the 
     United States Government for fiscal year 2001, revising the 
     congressional budget for the United States Government for 
     fiscal year 2000, and setting forth appropriate budgetary 
     levels for each of fiscal years 2002 through 2005.'', do pass 
     with the following amendment:
       Strike out all after the resolving clause and insert:

     SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL 
                   YEAR 2001.

       (a) Declaration.--Congress determines and declares that 
     this resolution is the concurrent resolution on the budget 
     for fiscal year 2001 including the appropriate budgetary 
     levels for fiscal years 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 as 
     authorized by section 301 of the Congressional Budget Act of 
     1974 and the revised budgetary levels for fiscal year 2000 as 
     authorized by section 304 of the Congressional Budget Act of 
     1974.
       (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this 
     concurrent resolution is as follows:

Sec. 1. Concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2001.

                      TITLE I--LEVELS AND AMOUNTS

Sec. 101. Recommended levels and amounts.
Sec. 102. Social Security.
Sec. 103. Major functional categories.
Sec. 104. Reconciliation of revenue reductions in the Senate.
Sec. 105. Appropriate levels for Function 920.
Sec. 106. Further appropriate levels for Function 920.

             TITLE II--BUDGETARY RESTRAINTS AND RULEMAKING

Sec. 201. Congressional lock box for Social Security surpluses.
Sec. 202. Reserve fund for prescription drugs.
Sec. 203. Reserve fund for stabilization of payments to counties in 
              support of education.
Sec. 204. Reserve fund for agriculture.
Sec. 205. Tax reduction reserve fund in the Senate.
Sec. 206. Mechanism for additional debt reduction.
Sec. 207. Emergency designation point of order in the Senate.
Sec. 208. Reserve fund pending increase of fiscal year 2001 
              discretionary spending limits.
Sec. 209. Congressional firewall for defense and nondefense spending.
Sec. 210. Mechanisms for strengthening budgetary integrity.
Sec. 211. Prohibition on use of Federal Reserve surpluses.
Sec. 212. Reaffirming the prohibition on the use of revenue offsets for 
              discretionary spending.
Sec. 213. Application and effect of changes in allocations and 
              aggregates.
Sec. 214. Reserve fund to foster the health of children with 
              disabilities and the employment and independence of their 
              families.
Sec. 215. Exercise of rulemaking powers.
Sec. 216. Reserve fund for military retiree health care.
Sec. 217. Reserve fund for early learning and parent support programs.

               TITLE III--SENSE OF THE SENATE PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Sense of the Senate on controlling and eliminating the 
              growing international problem of tuberculosis.
Sec. 302. Sense of the Senate on increased funding for the Child Care 
              and Development Block Grant.
Sec. 303. Sense of the Senate on tax relief for college tuition paid 
              and for interest paid on student loans.
Sec. 304. Sense of the Senate on increased funding for the National 
              Institutes of Health.
Sec. 305. Sense of the Senate supporting funding levels in Educational 
              Opportunities Act.
Sec. 306. Sense of the Senate on additional budgetary resources.
Sec. 307. Sense of the Senate on regarding the inadequacy of the 
              payments for skilled nursing care.
Sec. 308. Sense of the Senate on the CARA programs.
Sec. 309. Sense of the Senate on veterans' medical care.
Sec. 310. Sense of the Senate on Impact Aid.
Sec. 311. Sense of the Senate on funding for increased acreage under 
              the Conservation Reserve Program and the Wetlands Reserve 
              Program.
Sec. 312. Sense of the Senate on tax simplification.
Sec. 313. Sense of the Senate on antitrust enforcement by the 
              Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission 
              regarding agriculture mergers and anticompetitive 
              activity.
Sec. 314. Sense of the Senate regarding fair markets for American 
              farmers.
Sec. 315. Sense of the Senate on women and Social Security reform.
Sec. 316. Protection of battered women and children.
Sec. 317. Use of False Claims Act in combatting medicare fraud.
Sec. 318. Sense of the Senate regarding the National Guard.
Sec. 319. Sense of the Senate regarding military readiness.
Sec. 320. Sense of the Senate on compensation for the Chinese Embassy 
              bombing in Belgrade.
Sec. 321. Sense of the Senate supporting funding of digital opportunity 
              initiatives.
Sec. 322. Sense of the Senate regarding immunization funding.
Sec. 323. Sense of the Senate regarding tax credits for small 
              businesses providing health insurance to low-income 
              employees.
Sec. 324. Sense of the Senate on funding for criminal justice.
Sec. 325. Sense of the Senate regarding the Pell Grant.
Sec. 326. Sense of the Senate regarding comprehensive public education 
              reform.
Sec. 327. Sense of the Senate on providing adequate funding for United 
              States international leadership.
Sec. 328. Sense of the Senate concerning the HIV/AIDS crisis.
Sec. 329. Sense of the Senate regarding tribal colleges.
Sec. 330. Sense of the Senate to provide relief from the marriage 
              penalty.
Sec. 331. Sense of the Senate on the continued use of Federal fuel 
              taxes for the construction and rehabilitation of our 
              Nation's highways, bridges, and transit systems.
Sec. 332. Sense of the Senate on the internal combustion engine.
Sec. 333. Sense of the Senate regarding the establishment of a national 
              background check system for long-term care workers.
Sec. 334. Sense of the Senate concerning the price of prescription 
              drugs in the United States.
Sec. 335. Sense of the Senate against Federal funding of smoke shops.
Sec. 336. Sense of the Senate regarding the need to reduce gun violence 
              in America.
Sec. 337. Sense of the Senate supporting additional funding for fiscal 
              year 2001 for medical care for our Nation's veterans.
Sec. 338. Sense of the Senate regarding medical care for veterans.
Sec. 339. Sense of the Senate concerning investment of Social Security 
              trust funds.
Sec. 340. Sense of the Senate concerning digital opportunity.
Sec. 341. Sense of the Senate on medicare prescription drugs.

[[Page 5046]]

Sec. 342. Sense of the senate concerning funding for new education 
              programs.
Sec. 343. Sense of the Senate regarding enforcement of Federal firearms 
              laws.
Sec. 344. Sense of the Senate regarding the census.
Sec. 345. Sense of the Senate that any increase in the minimum wage 
              should be accompanied by tax relief for small businesses.
Sec. 346. Sense of the Senate concerning the minimum wage.
Sec. 347. Sense of Congress regarding funding for the participation of 
              members of the uniformed services in the Thrift Savings 
              Plan.
Sec. 348. Sense of the Senate concerning protecting the Social Security 
              trust funds.
Sec. 349. Sense of the Senate concerning regulation of tobacco 
              products.
Sec. 350. Sense of the Senate regarding after school programs.
Sec. 351. Sense of Senate regarding cash balance pension plan 
              conversions.
Sec. 352. Sense of the Senate concerning uninsured and low-income 
              individuals in medically underserved communities.
Sec. 353. Sense of the Senate concerning fiscal year 2001 funding for 
              the United States Coast Guard.

                      TITLE I--LEVELS AND AMOUNTS

     SEC. 101. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

       The following budgetary levels are the revised levels for 
     fiscal year 2000 and the appropriate levels for the fiscal 
     years 2001 through 2005:
       (1) Federal revenues.--For purposes of the enforcement of 
     this resolution--
       (A) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,464,604,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,501,903,341,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,547,229,399,000.
       Fiscal year 2003: $1,599,474,925,000.
       Fiscal year 2004: $1,655,748,225,000.
       Fiscal year 2005: $1,721,310,999,999.
       (B) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
     revenues should be changed are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2000: -$877,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: -$12,911,658,996.
       Fiscal year 2002: -$24,157,600,996.
       Fiscal year 2003: -$30,048,074,996.
       Fiscal year 2004: -$36,894,774,996
       Fiscal year 2005: -$42,790,999,997.
       (2) New budget authority.--For purposes of the enforcement 
     of this resolution, the appropriate levels of total new 
     budget authority are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,467,259,500,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,478,583,890,003.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,503,416,000,003.
       Fiscal year 2003: $1,614,843,200,003.
       Fiscal year 2004: $1,670,986,800,003.
       Fiscal year 2005: $1,731,182,000,003.
       (3) Budget outlays.--For purposes of the enforcement of 
     this resolution and the revised fiscal year 2000 resolution, 
     the appropriate levels of total budget outlays are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,441,461,500,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,451,702,341,003.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,470,727,399,003.
       Fiscal year 2003: $1,590,481,125,003.
       Fiscal year 2004: $1,644,813,025,003.
       Fiscal year 2005: $1,706,375,000,003.
       (4) Deficits.--For purposes of the enforcement of this 
     resolution, the amounts of the deficits are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2000: $23,147,500,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $53,473,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2002: $76,577,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2003: $9,076,200,001.
       Fiscal year 2004: $10,975,800,001.
       Fiscal year 2005: $14,958,000,001.
       (5) Public debt.--The appropriate levels of the public debt 
     are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2000: $5,625,962,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $5,667,144,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2002: $5,681,983,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2003: $5,768,762,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2004: $5,849,465,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2005: $5,923,674,000,001.
       (6) Debt held by the public.--The appropriate levels of the 
     debt held by the public are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2000: $3,455,362,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $3,248,659,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2002: $2,995,663,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2003: $2,802,939,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2004: $2,594,260,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2005: $2,364,124,000,001.

     SEC. 102. SOCIAL SECURITY.

       (a) Social Security Revenues.--For purposes of Senate 
     enforcement under section 311 of the Congressional Budget Act 
     of 1974, the amounts of revenues of the Federal Old-Age and 
     Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability 
     Insurance Trust Fund are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2000: $479,648,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $501,533,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $524,854,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003: $547,179,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004: $569,907,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005: $597,326,000,000.
       (b) Social Security Outlays.--For purposes of Senate 
     enforcement under section 311 of the Congressional Budget Act 
     of 1974, the amounts of outlays of the Federal Old-Age and 
     Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability 
     Insurance Trust Fund are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2000: $322,545,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $331,869,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $339,068,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003: $347,733,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004: $357,737,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005: $368,976,000,000.
       (c) Social Security Administrative Expenses.--In the 
     Senate, the amounts of new budget authority and budget 
     outlays of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust 
     Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund for 
     administrative expenses are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,160,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,187,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,429,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,378,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,471,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,438,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,505,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,473,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,541,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,507,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,576,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,543,000,000.

     SEC. 103. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

       Congress determines and declares that the appropriate 
     levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct 
     loan obligations, and new primary loan guarantee commitments 
     for fiscal year 2000 (as revised) and fiscal years 2001 
     through 2005 for each major functional category are:
       (1) National Defense (050):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $291,585,500,000.
       (B) Outlays, $288,114,500,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $309,843,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $296,074,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $309,091,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $302,278,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $315,489,200,000.
       (B) Outlays, $309,366,200,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $323,193,800,000.
       (B) Outlays, $317,463,800,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $331,534,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $327,950,000,000.
       (2) International Affairs (150):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,967,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,019,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,139,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $18,625,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,868,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,932,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,420,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,573,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,907,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,741,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,645,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,892,000,000.
       (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,267,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $18,418,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,703,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,245,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,877,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,593,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,806,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,515,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,069,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,655,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,337,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,900,000,000.
       (4) Energy (270):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,081,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$607,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,475,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $172,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$264,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$1,366,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,202,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$43,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,238,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$124,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,210,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$85,000,000.
       (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $24,487,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $24,245,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $24,936,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $24,905,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $25,023,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $25,045,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $25,019,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $25,203,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:

[[Page 5047]]

       (A) New budget authority, $25,066,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $25,065,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $25,059,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $24,876,000,000.
       (6) Agriculture (350):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $35,257,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $33,916,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,894,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $18,779,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,950,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,235,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,965,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,366,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,354,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,910,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,092,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,593,000,000.
       (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,594,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,141,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $6,117,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,977,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,608,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $4,864,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,356,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $4,677,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,413,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,391,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,368,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,331,000,000.
       (8) Transportation (400):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $54,352,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $46,656,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $59,247,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $50,822,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $57,536,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $53,486,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $59,101,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $55,516,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $59,135,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $56,138,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $59,174,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $56,418,000,000.
       (9) Community and Regional Development (450):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,336,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,725,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,271,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,438,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,822,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,878,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,665,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,823,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,657,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,290,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,744,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,904,000,000.
       (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services 
     (500):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $57,688,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $61,904,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $75,600,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $68,772,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $76,377,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $73,182,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $77,280,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $76,065,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $78,406,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $77,412,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $79,794,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $78,690,000,001.
       (11) Health (550):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $159,224,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $153,473,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $170,815,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $167,436,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $178,911,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $177,766,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $190,951,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $190,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $205,181,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $204,835,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $221,484,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $220,329,000,000.
       (12) Medicare (570):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $199,601,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $199,507,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $218,751,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $219,005,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $228,635,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $228,604,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $249,762,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $249,520,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $265,318,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $265,546,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $288,730,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $288,681,000,000.
       (13) Income Security (600):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $238,891,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $248,071,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $253,236,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $255,424,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $264,844,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $267,252,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $274,789,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $278,452,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $284,929,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $288,367,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $297,669,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $301,202,000,000.
       (14) Social Security (650):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,532,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,533,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,728,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,727,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,572,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,572,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,271,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,271,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,020,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,020,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,841,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,841,000,000.
       (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $46,010,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $45,130,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $48,568,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $48,071,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $49,323,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $49,189,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $51,338,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $51,010,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $52,619,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $52,340,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $56,017,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $55,692,000,000.
       (16) Administration of Justice (750):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $27,370,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $28,013,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $28,210,890,000.
       (B) Outlays, $28,345,341,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $28,520,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $28,782,399,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $29,157,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $29,191,925,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $31,283,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $31,021,225,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $32,124,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $31,863,000,000.
       (17) General Government (800):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,670,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,727,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,427,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,291,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,605,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,883,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,578,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,768,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,570,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,882,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,595,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,604,000,000.
       (18) Net Interest (900):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $284,491,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $284,493,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $286,920,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $286,920,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $285,291,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $285,290,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $279,465,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $279,465,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $275,502,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $275,502,000,001.
       Fiscal year 2005:

[[Page 5048]]

       (A) New budget authority, $270,951,000,001.
       (B) Outlays, $270,951,000,001.
       (19) Allowances (920):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$3,829,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$11,702,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$62,031,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$50,131,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$59,729,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$71,311,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $0.
       (B) Outlays, -$790,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $0.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,770,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $0.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,072,000,000.
       (20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$34,315,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$34,315,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$38,366,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$38,366,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$41,943,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$41,943,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, -$41,270,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$41,270,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, -$38,374,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$38,374,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, -$40,686,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$40,686,000,000.

     SEC. 104. RECONCILIATION OF REVENUE REDUCTIONS IN THE SENATE.

       Not later than September 22, 2000, the Senate Committee on 
     Finance shall report to the Senate a reconciliation bill 
     proposing changes in laws within its jurisdiction necessary 
     to reduce revenues by not more than $12,911,658,999 in fiscal 
     year 2001 and $146,803,109,999 for the period of fiscal years 
     2001 through 2005.

     SEC. 105. APPROPRIATE LEVELS FOR FUNCTION 920.

       Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution the 
     appropriate levels for function 920 are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$60,431,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$48,461,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$60,229,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$71,796,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, -$500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$5,287,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, -$500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$7,268,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, -$500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,570,000,000.

     SEC. 106. FURTHER APPROPRIATE LEVELS FOR FUNCTION 920.

       Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, the 
     appropriate levels for function 920 are as follows:
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$60,214,890,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$48,152,341,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$59,729,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$71,395,399,000.
       Fiscal year 2003:
       (A) New budget authority, $0.
       (B) Outlays, -$858,925,000.
       Fiscal year 2004:
       (A) New budget authority, $0.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,779,225,000.
       Fiscal year 2005:
       (A) New budget authority, $0.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,072,000,000.

             TITLE II--BUDGETARY RESTRAINTS AND RULEMAKING

     SEC. 201. CONGRESSIONAL LOCK BOX FOR SOCIAL SECURITY 
                   SURPLUSES.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
       (1) under the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990, the Social 
     Security trust funds are off-budget for purposes of the 
     President's budget submission and the concurrent resolution 
     on the budget;
       (2) the Social Security trust funds have been running 
     surpluses for 18 years;
       (3) these surpluses have been used to implicitly finance 
     the general operations of the Federal Government;
       (4) in fiscal year 2001, the Social Security surplus will 
     reach $166,000,000,000;
       (5) in fiscal year 1999, the Federal budget was balanced 
     without using Social Security;
       (6) the only way to ensure that Social Security surpluses 
     are not diverted for other purposes is to balance the budget 
     exclusive of such surpluses; and
       (7) Congress and the President should take such steps as 
     are necessary to ensure that future budgets continue to be 
     balanced excluding the surpluses generated by the Social 
     Security trust funds.
       (b) Point of Order.--
       (1) In general.--It shall not be in order in the House of 
     Representatives or the Senate to consider any revision to 
     this concurrent resolution, or any other concurrent 
     resolution on the budget, or any amendment thereto or 
     conference report thereon, that sets forth a deficit for any 
     fiscal year.
       (2) Deficit levels.--For purposes of this subsection, a 
     deficit shall be the level (if any) set forth in the most 
     recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget for 
     that fiscal year pursuant to section 301(a)(3) of the 
     Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
       (c) Budget Committee Determinations.--For purposes of this 
     section, the levels of new budget authority, outlays, direct 
     spending, new entitlement authority, revenues, deficits, and 
     surpluses for a fiscal year shall be determined on the basis 
     of estimates made by the Committee on the Budget of the House 
     of Representatives or the Senate, as applicable.
       (d) Exception.--Subsection (b) shall not apply if--
       (1) the most recent of the Department of Commerce's 
     advance, preliminary, or final reports of actual real 
     economic growth indicate that the rate of real economic 
     growth for each of the most recently reported quarter and the 
     immediately preceding quarter is less than 1 percent; or
       (2) a declaration of war is in effect.
       (e) Social Security Look-Back.--If in any fiscal year the 
     Social Security surplus is used to finance general operations 
     of the Federal Government, an amount equal to the amount used 
     shall be deducted from the available amount of discretionary 
     spending for the following fiscal year for purposes of any 
     concurrent resolution on the budget.
       (f) Waiver and Appeal.--Subsection (b) may be waived or 
     suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of three-
     fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative 
     vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly 
     chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain 
     an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order 
     raised under this section.

     SEC. 202. RESERVE FUND FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

       (a) Allocation.--In the Senate, spending aggregates and 
     other appropriate budgetary levels and limits may be adjusted 
     and allocations may be revised for legislation reported by 
     the Committee on Finance to provide a prescription drug 
     benefit for fiscal years 2001, 2002, and 2003, provided that 
     this legislation will not reduce the on-budget surplus by 
     more than $20,000,000,000 total during these 3 fiscal years, 
     and provided that the enactment of this legislation will not 
     cause an on-budget deficit in any of these 3 fiscal years.
       (b) Exception.--The adjustments provided in subsection (a) 
     shall be made for a bill or joint resolution, or an amendment 
     that is offered (in the Senate), that provides coverage for 
     prescription drugs, if the Senate Committee on Finance has 
     not reported such legislation on or before September 1, 2000.
       (c) Adjustment.--If legislation is reported by the Senate 
     Committee on Finance that extends the solvency of the 
     Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund without the use of 
     transfers of new subsidies from the general fund, without 
     decreasing beneficiaries' access to health care, and 
     excluding the cost of extending and modifying the 
     prescription drug benefit crafted pursuant to section (a) or 
     (b), then the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget may 
     change committee allocations and spending aggregates by no 
     more than $20,000,000,000 total for fiscal years 2004 and 
     2005 to fund the prescription drug benefit if such 
     legislation will not cause an on-budget deficit in either of 
     these 2 fiscal years.
       (d) Budgetary Enforcement.--The revision of allocations and 
     aggregates made under this section shall be considered for 
     the purposes of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as 
     allocations and aggregates contained in this resolution.

     SEC. 203. RESERVE FUND FOR STABILIZATION OF PAYMENTS TO 
                   COUNTIES IN SUPPORT OF EDUCATION.

       (a) Adjustment.--
       (1) In general.--Whenever the Committee on Energy and 
     Natural Resources of the Senate reports a bill, or an 
     amendment thereto is offered, or a conference report thereon 
     is submitted, that provides additional resources for counties 
     and complies with paragraph (2), the chairman of the 
     Committee on the Budget may increase the allocation of budget 
     authority and outlays to that committee by the amount of 
     budget authority (and the outlays resulting therefrom) 
     provided by that legislation for such purpose in accordance 
     with subsection (b).
       (2) Condition.--Legislation complies with this paragraph if 
     it provides for the stabilization of receipt-based payments 
     to counties that support school and road systems and also 
     provides that a portion of those payments would be dedicated 
     toward local investments in Federal lands within the 
     counties.
       (b) Limitations.--The adjustments to the allocations 
     required by subsection (a) shall not exceed $200,000,000 in 
     budget authority (and the outlays resulting therefrom) for 
     fiscal year 2001 and shall not exceed $1,100,000,000 in 
     budget authority (and the outlays resulting therefrom) for 
     the period of fiscal years 2001 through 2005.

     SEC. 204. RESERVE FUND FOR AGRICULTURE.

       (a) Adjustment.--
       (1) In general.--If the Committee on Agriculture, 
     Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate reports a bill on or 
     before June 29, 2000, or an amendment thereto is offered, or 
     a conference report thereon is submitted that provides 
     assistance for producers of program crops and specialty 
     crops, and enhancements for agriculture conservation programs 
     that complies with paragraph (2), the appropriate chairman of 
     the Committee on the Budget may increase the allocation of 
     budget authority and outlays to that committee by the amount 
     of budget authority (and the outlays resulting therefrom) 
     provided by that legislation for such purpose in accordance 
     with subsection (b).

[[Page 5049]]

       (2) Conditions.--Legislation complies with this paragraph 
     if it does not cause a net increase in budget authority and 
     outlays of greater than $1,640,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.
       (b) Limitations.--The adjustments to the allocations 
     required by subsection (a) shall not exceed $5,500,000,000 in 
     budget authority and outlays for fiscal year 2000, and 
     $3,000,000,000 in budget authority (and the outlays resulting 
     therefrom) for the period of fiscal years 2001 through 2005.

     SEC. 205. TAX REDUCTION RESERVE FUND IN THE SENATE.

       In the Senate, the chairman of the Committee on the Budget 
     may reduce the spending and revenue aggregates and may revise 
     committee allocations for legislation that reduces revenues 
     if such legislation will not increase the deficit or decrease 
     the surplus for--
       (1) fiscal year 2001; or
       (2) the period of fiscal years 2001 through 2005.

     SEC. 206. MECHANISM FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT REDUCTION.

       (a) In General.--If any of the legislation described in 
     subsection (b) does not become law on or before October 1, 
     2000, then the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the 
     Senate shall adjust the levels in this concurrent resolution 
     as provided in subsection (c).
       (b) Legislation.--The adjustment required by subsection (a) 
     shall be made with respect to--
       (1) the reconciliation legislation required by section 104; 
     or
       (2) the Medicare legislation provided for in section 202.
       (c) Adjustments To Be Made.--The adjustment required in 
     subsection (a) shall be--
       (1) with respect to the legislation required by section 
     104, to decrease the balance displayed on the Senate's pay-
     as-you-go scorecard and increase the revenue aggregate by the 
     amount set forth in section 104 (as adjusted, if adjusted, 
     pursuant to section 205) and to decrease the level of debt 
     held by the public as set forth in section 101(6) by that 
     same amount; or
       (2) with respect to the legislation provided for in section 
     202, to decrease the balance displayed on the Senate's pay-
     as-you-go scorecard by the amount set forth in section 202 
     and to decrease the level of debt held by the public as set 
     forth in section 101(6) by that same amount and make the 
     corresponding adjustments to the revenue and spending 
     aggregates and allocations (as adjusted by section 202).

     SEC. 207. EMERGENCY DESIGNATION POINT OF ORDER IN THE SENATE.

       (a) Designations.--
       (1) Guidance.--In making a designation of a provision of 
     legislation as an emergency requirement under section 
     251(b)(2)(A) or 252(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985, the committee report and any 
     statement of managers accompanying that legislation shall 
     analyze whether a proposed emergency requirement meets all 
     the criteria in paragraph (2).
       (2) Criteria.--
       (A) In general.--The criteria to be considered in 
     determining whether a proposed expenditure or tax change is 
     an emergency requirement are--
       (i) necessary, essential, or vital (not merely useful or 
     beneficial);
       (ii) sudden, quickly coming into being, and not building up 
     over time;
       (iii) an urgent, pressing, and compelling need requiring 
     immediate action;
       (iv) subject to subparagraph (B), unforeseen, 
     unpredictable, and unanticipated; and
       (v) not permanent, temporary in nature.
       (B) Unforeseen.--An emergency that is part of an aggregate 
     level of anticipated emergencies, particularly when normally 
     estimated in advance, is not unforeseen.
       (3) Justification for failure to meet criteria.--If the 
     proposed emergency requirement does not meet all the criteria 
     set forth in paragraph (2), the committee report or the 
     statement of managers, as the case may be, shall provide a 
     written justification of why the requirement should be 
     accorded emergency status.
       (b) Point of Order.--When the Senate is considering a bill, 
     resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report, a point 
     of order may be made by a Senator against an emergency 
     designation in that measure and if the Presiding Officer 
     sustains that point of order, that provision making such a 
     designation shall be stricken from the measure and may not be 
     offered as an amendment from the floor.
       (c) Waiver and Appeal.--This section may be waived or 
     suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of three-
     fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative 
     vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly 
     chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain 
     an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order 
     raised under this section.
       (d) Definition of an Emergency Requirement.--A provision 
     shall be considered an emergency designation if it designates 
     any item an emergency requirement pursuant to section 
     251(b)(2)(A) or 252(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985.
       (e) Form of the Point of Order.--A point of order under 
     this section may be raised by a Senator as provided in 
     section 313(e) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
       (f) Conference Reports.--If a point of order is sustained 
     under this section against a conference report the report 
     shall be disposed of as provided in section 313(d) of the 
     Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
       (g) Exception for Defense Spending.--Subsection (b) shall 
     not apply against an emergency designation for a provision 
     making discretionary appropriations in the defense category.

     SEC. 208. RESERVE FUND PENDING INCREASE OF FISCAL YEAR 2001 
                   DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
       (1) The functional totals with respect to discretionary 
     spending set forth in this concurrent resolution, if 
     implemented, would result in legislation which exceeds the 
     limit on discretionary spending for fiscal year 2001 set out 
     in section 251(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985. Nonetheless, the allocation 
     pursuant to section 302 of the Congressional Budget and 
     Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to the Committee on 
     Appropriations is in compliance with current law spending 
     limits.
       (2) Consequently unless and until the discretionary 
     spending limit for fiscal year 2001 is increased, aggregate 
     appropriations which exceed the current law limits would 
     still be out of order in the Senate and subject to a 
     supermajority vote.
       (3) The functional totals contained in this concurrent 
     resolution envision a level of discretionary spending for 
     fiscal year 2001 as follows:
       (A) For the discretionary category: $602,179,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $593,926,000,000 in outlays.
       (B) For the highway category: $26,920,000,000 in outlays.
       (C) For the mass transit category: $4,639,000,000 in 
     outlays.
       (4) To facilitate the Senate completing its legislative 
     responsibilities for the 106th Congress in a timely fashion, 
     it is imperative that the Senate consider legislation which 
     increases the discretionary spending limit for fiscal year 
     2001 as soon as possible.
       (b) Adjustment to Allocations.--Whenever a bill or joint 
     resolution becomes law that increases the discretionary 
     spending limit for fiscal year 2001 set out in section 251(c) 
     of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 
     1985, the appropriate chairman of the Committee on the Budget 
     shall increase the allocation called for in section 302(a) of 
     the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to the appropriate 
     Committee on Appropriations.
       (c) Limitation on Adjustment.--An adjustment made pursuant 
     to subsection (b) shall not result in an allocation under 
     section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 that 
     exceeds the total budget authority and outlays set forth in 
     subsection (a)(3).

     SEC. 209. CONGRESSIONAL FIREWALL FOR DEFENSE AND NONDEFENSE 
                   SPENDING.

       (a) Definition.--In this section, for fiscal year 2001 the 
     term ``discretionary spending limit'' means--
       (1) for the defense category, $310,819,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $297,050,000,000 in outlays; and
       (2) for the nondefense category, $291,360,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $329,183,000,000 in outlays.
       (b) Point of Order in the Senate.--
       (1) In general.--After the adjustment to the section 302(a) 
     allocation to the Appropriations Committee is made pursuant 
     to section 207 and except as provided in paragraph (2), it 
     shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any bill, 
     joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report 
     that exceeds any discretionary spending limit set forth in 
     this section.
       (2) Exception.--This subsection shall not apply if a 
     declaration of war by Congress is in effect.
       (c) Waiver and Appeal.--This section may be waived or 
     suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of three-
     fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative 
     vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly 
     chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain 
     an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order 
     raised under this section.

     SEC. 210. MECHANISMS FOR STRENGTHENING BUDGETARY INTEGRITY.

       (a) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term 
     ``budget year'' means with respect to a session of Congress, 
     the fiscal year of the Government that starts on October 1 of 
     the calendar year in which that session begins.
       (b) Point of Order With Respect to Advanced 
     Appropriations.--
       (1) In general.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to 
     consider any bill, resolution, amendment, motion or 
     conference report that--
       (A) provides an appropriation of new budget authority for 
     any fiscal year after the budget year that is in excess of 
     the amounts provided in paragraph (2); and
       (B) provides an appropriation of new budget authority for 
     any fiscal year subsequent to the year after the budget year.
       (2) Limitation on amounts.--The total amount, provided in 
     appropriations legislation for the budget year, of 
     appropriations for the subsequent fiscal year shall not 
     exceed $23,000,000,000.
       (c) Point of Order With Respect to Delayed Obligations.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), it 
     shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any bill, 
     resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report that 
     contains an appropriation of new budget authority for any 
     fiscal year which does not become available upon enactment of 
     such legislation or on the first day of that fiscal year 
     (whichever is later).

[[Page 5050]]

       (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect 
     to appropriations in the defense category; nor shall it apply 
     to appropriations reoccurring or customary or for the 
     following programs: Provided, That such appropriation is not 
     delayed beyond the specified date and does not exceed the 
     specified amount:
       (A) Department of the interior.--Operation of Indian 
     Programs School Operation Costs (Bureau of Indian Affairs 
     Funded Schools and Other Education Programs): July 1 not to 
     exceed $401,000,000.
       (B) Department of labor.--
       (i) Training and Employment Service: July 1 not to exceed 
     $1,650,000,000.
       (ii) State Unemployment Insurance: July 1 not to exceed 
     $902,000,000.
       (C) Department of education.--
       (i) Education Reform: July 1 not to exceed $512,000,000.
       (ii) Education for the Disadvantaged: July 1 not to exceed 
     $2,462,000,000.
       (iii) School Improvement Program: July 1 not to exceed 
     $975,000,000.
       (iv) Special Education: July 1 not to exceed 
     $2,048,000,000.
       (v) Vocational Education: July 1 not to exceed 
     $858,000,000.
       (D) Department of transportation.--Grants to the National 
     Railroad Passenger Corporation: September 30 not to exceed 
     $343,000,000.
       (E) Department of veterans' affairs.--Medical Care 
     (equipment-land-structures): August 1 not to exceed 
     $900,000,000.
       (F) Environmental protection agency.--Hazardous Substance 
     Superfund: September 1 not to exceed $100,000,000.
       (d) Waiver and Appeal.--Subsections (b) and (c) may be 
     waived or suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative vote 
     of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An 
     affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the 
     Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the 
     Senate to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a 
     point of order raised under this section.
       (e) Form of the Point of Order.--A point of order under 
     this section may be raised by a Senator as provided in 
     section 313(e) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment 
     Control Act of 1974.
       (f) Conference Reports.--If a point of order is sustained 
     under this section against a conference report, the report 
     shall be disposed of as provided in section 313(d) of the 
     Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974.
       (g) Precatory Amendments.--For purposes of interpreting 
     section 305(b)(2) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, an 
     amendment is not germane if it contains only precatory 
     language.
       (h) Sunset.--Except for subsection (g), this section shall 
     expire effective October 1, 2002.

     SEC. 211. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL RESERVE SURPLUSES.

       (a) Purpose.--The purpose of this section is to ensure that 
     transfers from nonbudgetary governmental entities such as the 
     Federal Reserve banks shall not be used to offset increased 
     on-budget spending when such transfers produce no real 
     budgetary or economic effects.
       (b) Budgetary Rule.--For purposes of points of order under 
     this resolution and the Congressional Budget and Impoundment 
     Control Act of 1974, provisions contained in any bill, 
     resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report that 
     affects any surplus funds of the Federal Reserve banks shall 
     not be scored with respect to the level of budget authority, 
     outlays, or revenues contained in such legislation.

     SEC. 212. REAFFIRMING THE PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF REVENUE 
                   OFFSETS FOR DISCRETIONARY SPENDING.

       (a) Purpose.--The purpose of this section is to reaffirm 
     Congress' belief that the discretionary spending limits 
     should be adhered to and not circumvented by increasing 
     taxes.
       (b) Restatement of Budgetary Rule.--For purposes of points 
     of order under this resolution and the Congressional Budget 
     and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, provisions contained in 
     an appropriations bill (or an amendment thereto or a 
     conference report thereon) resulting in increased revenues 
     shall continue not to be scored with respect to the level of 
     budget authority or outlays contained in such legislation.

     SEC. 213. APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF CHANGES IN ALLOCATIONS 
                   AND AGGREGATES.

       (a) Application.--Any adjustments of allocations and 
     aggregates made pursuant to this concurrent resolution for 
     any measure shall--
       (1) apply while that measure is under consideration;
       (2) take effect upon the enactment of that measure; and
       (3) be published in the Congressional Record as soon as 
     practicable.
       (b) Effect of Changed Allocations and Aggregates.--Revised 
     allocations and aggregates resulting from these adjustments 
     shall be considered for the purposes of the Congressional 
     Budget Act of 1974 as allocations and aggregates contained in 
     this concurrent resolution.

     SEC. 214. RESERVE FUND TO FOSTER THE HEALTH OF CHILDREN WITH 
                   DISABILITIES AND THE EMPLOYMENT AND 
                   INDEPENDENCE OF THEIR FAMILIES.

       (a) Adjustment.--
       (1) In general.--Whenever the Committee on Finance of the 
     Senate reports a bill, or an amendment thereto is offered, or 
     a conference report thereon is submitted, that facilitates 
     children with disabilities receiving needed health care at 
     home and complies with paragraph (2), the chairman of the 
     Committee on the Budget may increase the spending aggregate 
     and allocation of budget authority and outlays to that 
     committee by the amount of budget authority (and the outlays 
     resulting therefrom) provided by that legislation for such 
     purpose in accordance with subsection (b).
       (2) Condition.--Legislation complies with this paragraph if 
     it finances health programs designed to allow children with 
     disabilities to access the health services they need to 
     remain at home with their families while allowing their 
     families to become or remain employed.
       (b) Limitations.--The adjustments to the spending 
     aggregates and allocations required by subsection (a) shall 
     not exceed $50,000,000 in budget authority (and the outlays 
     resulting therefrom) for fiscal year 2001 and shall not 
     exceed $300,000,000 in budget authority (and the outlays 
     resulting therefrom) for the period of fiscal years 2001 
     through 2005.

     SEC. 215. EXERCISE OF RULEMAKING POWERS.

       Congress adopts the provisions of this title--
       (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate 
     and the House of Representatives, respectively, and as such 
     they shall be considered as part of the rules of each House, 
     or of that House to which they specifically apply, and such 
     rules shall supersede other rules only to the extent that 
     they are inconsistent therewith; and
       (2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of 
     either House to change those rules (so far as they relate to 
     that House) at any time, in the same manner, and to the same 
     extent as in the case of any other rule of that House.

     SEC. 216. RESERVE FUND FOR MILITARY RETIREE HEALTH CARE.

       (a) In General.--In the Senate, aggregates, allocations, 
     functional totals, and other budgetary levels and limits may 
     be revised for Department of Defense authorization 
     legislation reported by the Committee on Armed Services of 
     the Senate to fund improvements to health care programs for 
     military retirees and their dependents in order to fulfill 
     the promises made to them: Provided, That the enactment of 
     that legislation will not cause an on-budget deficit for--
       (1) fiscal year 2001; or
       (2) the period of fiscal years 2001 through 2005.
       (b) Revised Levels.--Upon the consideration of legislation 
     pursuant to subsection (a), the Chairman of the Committee on 
     the Budget of the Senate may file with the Senate 
     appropriately revised allocations under section 302(a) of the 
     Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and revised functional 
     levels and aggregates to carry out this section. These 
     revised allocations, functional levels, and aggregates shall 
     be considered for the purposes of the Congressional Budget 
     Act of 1974 as allocations, functional levels, and aggregates 
     contained in this resolution.

     SEC. 217. RESERVE FUND FOR EARLY LEARNING AND PARENT SUPPORT 
                   PROGRAMS.

       (a) Adjustment.--When the Committee on Education and 
     Workforce of the House of Representatives or the Committee on 
     Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate reports 
     a bill, an amendment is offered in the House of 
     Representatives or the Senate, or a conference report is 
     filed that improves opportunities at the local level for 
     early learning, brain development, and school readiness for 
     young children from birth to age 6 and offers support 
     programs for such families, particularly those with special 
     needs such as mental health issues and behavioral disorders, 
     the relevant chairman of the Committee on the Budget may 
     increase the allocation aggregates, functions, totals, and 
     other budgetary totals in the resolution by the amount of 
     budget authority (and the outlays resulting therefrom) 
     provided by the legislation for such purpose in accordance 
     with subsection (b) if the legislation does not cause an on-
     budget deficit.
       (b) Limitations.--The adjustments to the aggregates and 
     totals pursuant to subsection (a) shall not exceed 
     $8,500,000,000 on-budget authority (and the outlays resulting 
     therefrom) for the period fiscal year 2001 through 2005.

               TITLE III--SENSE OF THE SENATE PROVISIONS

     SEC. 301. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON CONTROLLING AND ELIMINATING 
                   THE GROWING INTERNATIONAL PROBLEM OF 
                   TUBERCULOSIS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
       (1) According to the World Health Organization--
       (A) nearly 2,000,000 people worldwide die each year of 
     tuberculosis-related illnesses;
       (B) one-third of the world's total population is infected 
     with tuberculosis; and
       (C) tuberculosis is the world's leading killer of women 
     between 15- and 44-years old and is a leading cause of 
     children becoming orphans.
       (2) Because of the ease of transmission of tuberculosis, 
     its international persistence and growth pose a direct public 
     health threat to those nations that had previously largely 
     controlled the disease. This is complicated in the United 
     States by the growth of the homeless population, the rate of 
     incarceration, international travel, immigration, and HIV/
     AIDS.
       (3) With nearly 40 percent of the tuberculosis cases in the 
     United States attributable to foreign-born persons, 
     tuberculosis will never be eliminated in the United States 
     until it is controlled abroad.
       (4) The means exist to control tuberculosis through 
     screening, diagnosis, treatment, patient compliance, 
     monitoring, and ongoing review of outcomes.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assumes that additional 
     resources should be provided to fund international 
     tuberculosis control

[[Page 5051]]

     efforts at $60,000,000 in fiscal year 2001, consistent with 
     authorizing legislation approved by the Committee on Foreign 
     Relations of the Senate.

     SEC. 302. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON INCREASED FUNDING FOR THE 
                   CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) in 1998, 33.2 percent of women in the labor force have 
     children under 14;
       (2) in 1998, 65.2 percent of women with children younger 
     than age 6, and 78.4 percent of women with children ages 6 
     through 17 were in the labor force, and 41.6 percent of women 
     with children younger than 3 were employed full-time;
       (3) 1,920,000 couples both working and with children under 
     18 had family incomes of under $30,000 (10.3 percent);
       (4)(A) in 1998, 11,700,000 children out of 21,300,000 (55.1 
     percent) under the age of 5 have employed mothers;
       (B) 18.4 percent of children under 6 are cared for by their 
     fathers at home;
       (C) another 5.5 percent (562,000) are looked after by their 
     mother either at home or away from home; and
       (D) in other words, less than a quarter (23.9 percent) of 
     these children are taken care of by 1 parent;
       (5) a 1997 General Accounting Office study found that the 
     increased work participation requirement of the welfare 
     reform law will cause the need for child care to exceed the 
     known supply;
       (6) a 1995 study by the Urban Institute of child care 
     prices in 6 cities found that the average cost of daycare for 
     a 2-year-old in a child care center ranged from $3,100 to 
     $8,100;
       (7) for an entry-level worker, the family's child care 
     costs at the average price of care for an infant in a child 
     care center would be at least 50 percent of family income in 
     5 of the 6 cities examined;
       (8) a large number of low- and middle-income families 
     sacrifice a second full-time income so that a parent may be 
     at home with the child;
       (9) the average income of 2-parent families with a single 
     income (a family with children, wife does not work) is 
     $13,566 less than the average income of 2-parent families 
     with 2 incomes;
       (10) a recent National Institute for Child Health and 
     Development study found that the greatest factor in the 
     development of a young child is ``what is happening at home 
     and in families''; and
       (11) increased tax relief directed at making child care 
     more affordable, and increased funding for the Child Care and 
     Development Block Grant, would take significant steps toward 
     bringing quality child care within the reach of many parents, 
     and would increase the options available to parents in 
     deciding how best to care for their children.
       (b) Sense of Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that 
     the levels in this resolution and legislation enacted 
     pursuant to this resolution assume--
       (1) that tax relief should be directed to parents who are 
     struggling to afford quality child care, including those who 
     wish to stay home to care for a child, and should be included 
     in any tax cut package; and
       (2) a total of $4,567,000,000 in funding for the Child Care 
     and Development Block Grant in fiscal year 2001.

     SEC. 303. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON TAX RELIEF FOR COLLEGE 
                   TUITION PAID AND FOR INTEREST PAID ON STUDENT 
                   LOANS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) in our increasingly competitive global economy, the 
     attainment of a higher education is critical to the economic 
     success of an individual, as evidenced by the fact that, in 
     1975, college graduates earned an average of 57 percent more 
     than those who just finished high school, compared to 76 
     percent more today;
       (2) the cost of attaining a higher education has outpaced 
     both inflation and median family incomes;
       (3) specifically, over the past 20 years, the cost of 
     college tuition has quadrupled (growing faster than any 
     consumer item, including health care and nearly twice as fast 
     as inflation) and 8 times as fast as median household 
     incomes;
       (4) despite recent increases passed by Congress, the value 
     of the maximum Pell Grant has declined 23 percent since 1975 
     in inflation-adjusted terms, forcing more students to rely on 
     student loans to finance the cost of a higher education;
       (5) from 1992 to 1998, the demand for student loans soared 
     82 percent and the average student loan increased 367 
     percent;
       (6) according to the Department of Education, there is 
     approximately $150,000,000,000 in outstanding student loan 
     debt, and students borrowed more during the 1990's than 
     during the 1960's, 1970's, and 1980's combined; and
       (7) in Congress, proposals have been made to address the 
     rising cost of tuition and mounting student debt, including a 
     bipartisan proposal to provide a deduction for tuition paid 
     and a credit for interest paid on student loans.
       (b) Sense of Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that 
     the levels in this resolution and legislation enacted 
     pursuant to this resolution assume that any tax cut package 
     reported by the Finance Committee and passed by Congress 
     during the fiscal year 2001 budget reconciliation process 
     include tax relief for college tuition paid and for interest 
     paid on student loans.

     SEC. 304. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON INCREASED FUNDING FOR THE 
                   NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) the National Institutes of Health is the Nation's 
     foremost research center;
       (2) the Nation's commitment to and investment in biomedical 
     research has resulted in better health and an improved 
     quality of life for all Americans;
       (3) continued biomedical research funding must be ensured 
     so that medical doctors and scientists have the security to 
     commit to conducting long-term research studies;
       (4) funding for the National Institutes of Health should 
     continue to increase in order to prevent the cessation of 
     biomedical research studies and the loss of medical doctors 
     and research scientists to private research organizations; 
     and
       (5) the National Institutes of Health conducts research 
     protocols without proprietary interests, thereby ensuring 
     that the best health care is researched and made available to 
     the Nation.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume increased funding 
     in function 550 (Health) for the National Institutes of 
     Health of $2,700,000,000, reflecting the commitment made in 
     the fiscal year 1998 Senate Budget Resolution to double the 
     National Institute of Health budget by 2003.

     SEC. 305. SENSE OF THE SENATE SUPPORTING FUNDING LEVELS IN 
                   EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES ACT.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the levels in this 
     resolution assume that of the amounts provided for elementary 
     and secondary education within the Budget Function 500 of 
     this resolution for fiscal years 2001 through 2005, such 
     funds shall be appropriated in proportion to and in 
     accordance with the levels authorized in the Educational 
     Opportunities Act, S. 2.

     SEC. 306. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON ADDITIONAL BUDGETARY 
                   RESOURCES.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
       (1) In its review of government operations, the General 
     Accounting Office noted that it was unable to determine the 
     extent of improper government payments, due to the poor 
     quality of agency accounting practices. In particular, the 
     General Accounting Office cited the Government's inability 
     to--
       (A) ``properly account for and report billions of dollars 
     of property, equipment, materials, and supplies and certain 
     stewardship assets''; and
       (B) ``properly prepare the Federal Government's financial 
     statements, including balancing the statements, accounting 
     for billions of dollars of transactions between governmental 
     entities, and properly and consistently compiling the 
     information in the financial statements.''.
       (2) Private economic forecasters are currently more 
     optimistic than the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Blue 
     Chip expects 2000 real GDP growth of 4.1 percent, whereas the 
     Congressional Budget Office expects 3.3 percent growth. From 
     1999 through 2005, Blue Chip expects real GDP to grow more 
     than 0.3 percentage points faster per year than the 
     Congressional Budget Office does. Using budgetary rules of 
     thumb, this latter difference translates into more than 
     $150,000,000,000 over the 5-year budget window.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels contained in this resolution assume that--
       (1) there are billions of dollars in wasted expenditures in 
     the Federal Government that should be eliminated; and
       (2) higher projected budget surpluses arising from 
     reductions in government waste and stronger revenue inflows 
     could be used in the future for additional tax relief or debt 
     reduction.

     SEC. 307. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON REGARDING THE INADEQUACY OF 
                   THE PAYMENTS FOR SKILLED NURSING CARE.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) Congress confronted and addressed the funding crisis 
     for medicare beneficiaries requiring skilled nursing care 
     through the Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999;
       (2) Congress recognized the need to address the inadequacy 
     of the prospective payment system for certain levels of care, 
     as well as the need to end arbitrary limits on rehabilitative 
     therapies. Congress restored $2,700,000,000 to reduce access 
     threats to skilled care for medicare beneficiaries; and
       (3) Currently, more than 1,600 skilled nursing facilities 
     caring for more than 175,000 frail and elderly Americans have 
     filed for bankruptcy protection.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that--
       (1) the Administration should identify areas where they 
     have the authority to make changes to improve quality, 
     including analyzing and fixing the labor component of the 
     skilled nursing facility market basket update factor; and
       (2) while Congress deliberates funding structural medicare 
     reform and the addition of a prescription drug benefit, it 
     must maintain the continued viability of the current skilled 
     nursing benefit. Therefore, the committees of jurisdiction 
     should ensure that medicare beneficiaries requiring skilled 
     nursing care have access to that care and that those 
     providers have the resources to meet the expectation for high 
     quality care.

     SEC. 308. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE CARA PROGRAMS.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the levels in this 
     resolution assume that, if the Congress and the President so 
     choose, the following programs can be fully funded as 
     discretionary programs in fiscal year 2001, including--
       (1) the Land and Water Conservation Fund programs;

[[Page 5052]]

       (2) the Federal aid to Wildlife Fund;
       (3) the Urban Parks and Recreation Recovery Grants;
       (4) the National Historic Preservation Fund;
       (5) the Payment in Lieu of Taxes; and
       (6) the North American Wetlands Conservation Act.

     SEC. 309. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON VETERANS' MEDICAL CARE.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) this budget addresses concerns about veterans' medical 
     care;
       (2) we successfully increased the appropriation for 
     veterans' medical care by $1,700,000,000 last year, although 
     the President had proposed no increase in funding in his 
     budget; and
       (3) this year's budget proposes to increase the veterans' 
     medical care appropriation by $1,400,000,000, the level of 
     funding in the President's budget.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume an increase of 
     $1,400,000,000 in veterans' medical care appropriations in 
     fiscal year 2001.

     SEC. 310. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON IMPACT AID.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) the Impact Aid, as created by Congress in 1950, 
     fulfills a Federal obligation to local educational agencies 
     impacted by a Federal presence;
       (2) the Impact Aid provides funds to these local 
     educational agencies to help them meet the basic educational 
     needs of all their children, particularly the needs of 
     transient military dependent students, Native American 
     children, and students from low-income housing projects; and
       (3) the Impact Aid is funded at a level less than what is 
     required to fully fund ``all'' federally connected local 
     educational agencies.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that the Impact Aid 
     Program strive to reach the goal that all local educational 
     agencies eligible for Impact Aid receive at a minimum, 40 
     percent of their maximum payment under sections 8002 and 
     8003.

     SEC. 311. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON FUNDING FOR INCREASED 
                   ACREAGE UNDER THE CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM 
                   AND THE WETLANDS RESERVE PROGRAM.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
       (1) The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and the Wetlands 
     Reserve Program (WRP) have been successful, voluntary, 
     incentive-based endeavors that over the last decade and a 
     half have turned millions of acres of marginal cropland into 
     reserves that protect wildlife in the United States, provide 
     meaningful income to farmers and ranchers (especially in 
     periods of collapsed commodity prices), and combat soil and 
     water erosion. CRP and WRP also provide increased 
     opportunities for hunting, fishing, and other recreational 
     activities.
       (2) CRP provides landowners with technical and financial 
     assistance, including annual rental payments, in exchange for 
     removing environmentally sensitive farmland from production 
     and implementing conservation practices. Currently, CRP 
     includes around 31,300,000 acres in the United States.
       (3) Similarly, WRP offers technical and financial 
     assistance to landowners who select to restore wetlands. 
     Currently, WRP includes 785,000 acres nationwide.
       (4) Furthermore, bipartisan legislation has been introduced 
     in the 106th Congress to increase the acreage permitted under 
     both CRP and WRP. The Administration also supports raising 
     the acreage limitations in both programs.
       (5) Unfortunately, both CRP and WRP may soon become victims 
     of their own success and their respective statutory acreage 
     limitations unless Congress acts. Given the popularity and 
     demand for these conservation programs, the statutory acreage 
     limitations will likely exhaust resources available to 
     producers who want to participate in CRP or WRP. As currently 
     authorized, CRP has an enrollment cap of 36,400,000 acres and 
     WRP is limited at 975,000 acres. As of October 1, 1999, 
     enrollment in CRP stood at approximately 31,300,000 acres and 
     enrollment in WRP at just over 785,000 acres.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that Congress and 
     the Administration should take steps to raise the acreage 
     limits of the CRP and WRP in order to make these programs 
     available to aid the preservation and conservation of 
     sensitive natural soil and water resources without negatively 
     effecting rural communities. Further, such actions should 
     help improve farm income for agricultural producers and 
     restore prosperity and growth to rural sectors of the United 
     States.

     SEC. 312. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON TAX SIMPLIFICATION.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
       (1) the tax code has become increasingly complex, 
     undermining confidence in the system, and often undermining 
     the principles of simplicity, efficiency, and equity;
       (2) some have estimated that the resources required to keep 
     records and file returns already cost American families an 
     additional 10 percent to 20 percent over what they actually 
     pay in income taxes; and
       (3) if it is to enact a greatly simplified tax code, 
     Congress should have a thorough understanding of the problem 
     as well as specific proposals to consider.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that the Joint 
     Committee on Taxation shall develop a report and alternative 
     proposals on tax simplification by the end of the year, and 
     the Department of the Treasury is requested to develop a 
     report and alternative proposals on tax simplification by the 
     end of the year.

     SEC. 313. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT BY THE 
                   DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND FEDERAL TRADE 
                   COMMISSION REGARDING AGRICULTURE MERGERS AND 
                   ANTICOMPETITIVE ACTIVITY.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
       (1) the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is 
     charged with the civil and criminal enforcement of the 
     antitrust laws, including the review of corporate mergers 
     likely to reduce competition in particular markets, with a 
     goal of protecting the competitive process;
       (2) the Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade 
     Commission is also charged with enforcement of the antitrust 
     laws, including the review of corporate mergers likely to 
     reduce competition;
       (3) the Antitrust Division and the Bureau of Competition 
     are also responsible for the prosecution of companies and 
     individuals who engage in anti-competitive behavior and 
     unfair trade practices;
       (4) the number of merger filings under the Hart-Scott-
     Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, which the 
     Department of Justice, in conjunction with the Federal Trade 
     Commission, is required to review, has increased 
     significantly in fiscal years 1998 and 1999;
       (5) large agri-businesses have constituted part of this 
     trend in mergers and acquisitions;
       (6) farmers and small agricultural producers are 
     experiencing one of the worst periods of economic downturn in 
     years;
       (7) farmers currently get less than a quarter of every 
     retail food dollar, down from nearly half of every retail 
     food dollar in 1952;
       (8) the top 4 beef packers presently control 80 percent of 
     the market, the top 4 pork producers control 57 percent of 
     the market, and the largest sheep processors and poultry 
     processors control 73 percent and 55 percent of the market, 
     respectively;
       (9) the 4 largest grain processing companies presently 
     account for approximately 62 percent of the Nation's flour 
     milling, and the 4 largest firms control approximately 75 
     percent of the wet corn milling and soybean crushing 
     industry;
       (10) farmers and small, independent producers are concerned 
     about the substantial increase in concentration in the 
     agriculture industry and significantly diminished 
     opportunities in the marketplace; and
       (11) farmers and small, independent producers are also 
     concerned about possible anticompetitive behavior and unfair 
     business practices in the agriculture industry.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that--
       (1) the Antitrust Division and the Bureau of Competition 
     will have adequate resources to enable them to meet their 
     statutory requirements, including those related to reviewing 
     increasingly numerous and complex mergers and investigating 
     and prosecuting anticompetitive business activity; and
       (2) these departments will--
       (A) dedicate considerable resources to matters and 
     transactions dealing with agri-business antitrust and 
     competition; and
       (B) ensure that all vertical and horizontal mergers 
     implicating agriculture and all complaints regarding possible 
     anticompetitive business practices in the agriculture 
     industry will receive extraordinary scrutiny.

     SEC. 314. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING FAIR MARKETS FOR 
                   AMERICAN FARMERS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) United States agricultural producers are the most 
     efficient and competitive in the world;
       (2) United States agricultural producers are at a 
     competitive disadvantage in the world market because the 
     European Union outspends the United States (on a dollar/acre 
     basis) by a ratio of 10:1 on domestic support and by a ratio 
     of 60:1 on export subsidies;
       (3) the support the European Union gives their producers 
     results in more prosperous rural communities in Europe than 
     in the United States;
       (4) the European Union blocked consensus at the World Trade 
     Organization ministerial meeting in Seattle because Europe 
     does not want to surrender its current advantage in world 
     markets;
       (5) despite the competitiveness of American farmers, the 
     European advantage has led to a declining United States share 
     of the world market for agricultural products;
       (6) the United States Department of Agriculture reports 
     that United States export growth has lagged behind that of 
     our major competitors, resulting in a loss of United States 
     market share, from 24 percent in 1981 to its current level of 
     18 percent;
       (7) the United States Department of Agriculture also 
     reports that United States market share of global 
     agricultural trade has eroded steadily over the past 2 
     decades, which could culminate in the United States losing 
     out to the European Union as the world's top agricultural 
     exporter sometime in 2000;
       (8) prices of agricultural commodities in the United States 
     are at 50-year lows in real terms, creating a serious 
     economic crisis in rural America; and
       (9) fundamental fairness requires that the playing field be 
     leveled so that United States farmers are no longer at a 
     competitive disadvantage.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that--

[[Page 5053]]

       (1) the United States should take steps to increase support 
     for American farmers in order to level the playing field for 
     United States agricultural producers and increase the 
     leverage of the United States in World Trade Organization 
     negotiations on agriculture as long as such support is not 
     trade distorting, and does not otherwise exceed or impair 
     existing Uruguay Round obligations; and
       (2) such actions should improve United States farm income 
     and restore the prosperity of rural communities.

     SEC. 315. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON WOMEN AND SOCIAL SECURITY 
                   REFORM.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) without Social Security benefits, the elderly poverty 
     rate among women would have been 52.2 percent, and among 
     widows would have been 60.6 percent;
       (2) women tend to live longer and tend to have lower 
     lifetime earnings than men do;
       (3) during their working years, women earn an average of 70 
     cents for every dollar men earn; and
       (4) women spend an average of 11.5 years out of their 
     careers to care for their families, and are more likely to 
     work part-time than full-time.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that--
       (1) women face unique obstacles in ensuring retirement 
     security and survivor and disability stability;
       (2) Social Security plays an essential role in guaranteeing 
     inflation-protected financial stability for women throughout 
     their old age;
       (3) the Congress and the Administration should act, as part 
     of Social Security reform, to ensure that widows and other 
     poor elderly women receive more adequate benefits that reduce 
     their poverty rates and that women, under whatever approach 
     is taken to reform Social Security, should receive no lesser 
     a share of overall federally funded retirement benefits than 
     they receive today; and
       (4) the sacrifice that women make to care for their family 
     should be recognized during reform of Social Security and 
     that women should not be penalized by taking an average of 
     11.5 years out of their careers to care for their family.

     SEC. 316. PROTECTION OF BATTERED WOMEN AND CHILDREN.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
       (1) Each year an estimated 1,000,000 women suffer nonfatal 
     violence by an intimate partner.
       (2) Nearly 1 out of 3 adult women can expect to experience 
     at least 1 physical assault by a partner during adulthood.
       (3) Domestic violence is statistically consistent across 
     racial and ethnic lines. It does not discriminate based on 
     race or economic status.
       (4) The chance of being victimized by an intimate partner 
     is 10 times greater for a woman than a man.
       (5) Past and current victims of domestic violence are over-
     represented in the welfare population. It is estimated that 
     at least 60 percent of current welfare beneficiaries have 
     experienced some form of domestic violence.
       (6) Abused women who do seek employment face barriers as a 
     result of domestic violence. Welfare studies show that 15 to 
     50 percent of abused women report interference from their 
     partner with education, training, or employment.
       (7) The programs established by the Violence Against Women 
     Act of 1994 have empowered communities to address the threat 
     caused by domestic violence.
       (8) Since 1995, Congress has appropriated close to 
     $1,800,000,000 to fund programs established by the Violence 
     Against Women Act of 1994, including the STOP program, 
     shelters for battered women and children, the domestic 
     violence hotline, and Centers for Disease Control and 
     Prevention injury control programs.
       (9) The programs established by the Violence Against Women 
     Act of 1994 have been and continue to comprise a successful 
     national strategy for addressing the needs of battered women 
     and the public health threat caused by this violence.
       (10) The Supreme Court could act during this session to 
     overturn a major protection and course of action provided for 
     in the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. In United States 
     v. Morrison/Brzonkala, the Supreme Court will address the 
     issue of the constitutionality of the Federal civil rights 
     remedy under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, and may 
     overturn congressional intent to elevate violence against 
     women to a category protected under Federal civil rights law.
       (11) The actions taken by the courts and the failure to 
     reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 has 
     generated a great deal of concern in communities nationwide.
       (12) Funding for the programs established by the Violence 
     Against Women Act of 1994 is the only lifeline for battered 
     women and Congress has a moral obligation to continue funding 
     and to strengthen key components of the Violence Against 
     Women Act of 1994.
       (13) Congress and the Administration should work to ensure 
     the continued funding of programs established by the Violence 
     Against Women Act of 1994.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that, in light of 
     the pending litigation challenging the constitutionality of 
     the Federal civil rights remedy in the Violence Against Women 
     Act of 1994 and the lack of action on legislation 
     reauthorizing and strengthening the provisions of that Act--
       (1) Congress, through reauthorization of the programs 
     established by the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, should 
     work to eliminate economic barriers that trap women and 
     children in violent homes and relationships; and
       (2) full funding for the programs established by the 
     Violence Against Women Act of 1994 will be provided from the 
     Violent Crime Reduction Fund.

     SEC. 317. USE OF FALSE CLAIMS ACT IN COMBATTING MEDICARE 
                   FRAUD.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) the solvency of the medicare trust funds is of vital 
     importance to the well-being of the Nation's seniors and 
     other vulnerable people in need of quality health care;
       (2) fraud against the medicare trust funds is a major 
     problem resulting in the depletion of the trust funds; and
       (3) chapter 37 of title 31, United States Code (commonly 
     referred to as the False Claims Act) and the qui tam 
     provisions of that chapter are vital tools in combatting 
     fraud against the medicare program.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that chapter 37 of 
     title 31, United States Code (commonly referred to as the 
     False Claims Act) and the qui tam provisions of that chapter 
     are essential tools in combatting medicare fraud and should 
     not be weakened in any way.

     SEC. 318. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE NATIONAL GUARD.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) the Army National Guard relies heavily upon thousands 
     of full-time employees, Military Technicians and Active 
     Guard/Reserves, to ensure unit readiness throughout the Army 
     National Guard;
       (2) these employees perform vital day-to-day functions, 
     ranging from equipment maintenance to leadership and staff 
     roles, that allow the drill weekends and annual active duty 
     training of the traditional Guardsmen to be dedicated to 
     preparation for the National Guard's warfighting and 
     peacetime missions;
       (3) when the ability to provide sufficient Active Guard/
     Reserves and Technicians end strength is reduced, unit 
     readiness, as well as quality of life for soldiers and 
     families is degraded;
       (4) the Army National Guard, with agreement from the 
     Department of Defense, requires a minimum essential 
     requirement of 23,500 Active Guard/Reserves and 25,500 
     Technicians; and
       (5) the fiscal year 2001 budget request for the Army 
     National Guard provides resources sufficient for 
     approximately 22,430 Active Guard/Reserves and 23,957 
     Technicians, end strength shortfalls of 1,052 and 1,543, 
     respectively.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.-- It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in the resolution assume that the Department 
     of Defense will give priority to funding the Active Guard/
     Reserves and Military Technicians at levels authorized by 
     Congress in the fiscal year 2000 Department of Defense 
     authorization bill.

     SEC. 319. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING MILITARY READINESS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) the Secretary of the Air Force stated that the United 
     States Air Force's top unfunded readiness priority for fiscal 
     year 2000 was its aircraft spares and repair parts account 
     and top Air Force officers have said that getting more spares 
     is a top priority to improve readiness rates;
       (2) the Chief of Naval Operations stated that the aircraft 
     spares and repair parts account for a top readiness priority 
     important to the long-term health of the Navy;
       (3) the General Accounting Office's study of personnel 
     retention problems in the armed services cited shortages of 
     spares and repair parts as a major reason why people are 
     leaving the services;
       (4) the fiscal year 2001 budget request decreases the Air 
     Force's spares and repair parts account by 13 percent from 
     fiscal year 2000 expected levels; and
       (5) the fiscal year 2001 budget request decreases the 
     Navy's spares and repair parts account by 6 percent from the 
     fiscal year 2000 expected levels.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the functional totals in the budget resolution assume 
     that Congress will protect the Department of Defense's 
     readiness accounts, including spares and repair parts, and 
     operations and maintenance, and use the requested levels as 
     the minimum baseline for fiscal year 2001 authorization and 
     appropriations.

     SEC. 320. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON COMPENSATION FOR THE CHINESE 
                   EMBASSY BOMBING IN BELGRADE.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the levels in this 
     resolution assume funds designated to compensate the People's 
     Republic of China for the damage inadvertently done to their 
     embassy in Belgrade by NATO forces in May 1999, should not be 
     appropriated from the international affairs budget.

     SEC. 321. SENSE OF THE SENATE SUPPORTING FUNDING OF DIGITAL 
                   OPPORTUNITY INITIATIVES.

       (a) The Senate finds that--
       (1) computers, the Internet, and information networks are 
     not luxury items but basic tools largely responsible for 
     driving the current economic expansions;
       (2) information technology utility relies on software 
     applications and online content;
       (3) access to computers and the Internet and the ability to 
     use this technology effectively is becoming increasingly 
     important for full participation in America's economic, 
     political, and social life; and

[[Page 5054]]

       (4) unequal access to technology and high-tech skills by 
     income, educational level, race, and geography could deepen 
     and reinforce the divisions that exist within American 
     society.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that the Committees 
     on Appropriations and Finance should support efforts that 
     address the digital divide, including tax incentives and 
     funding to--
       (1) broaden access to information technologies;
       (2) provide workers and teachers with information 
     technology training;
       (3) promote innovative online content and software 
     applications that will improve commerce, education, and 
     quality of life; and
       (4) help provide information and communications technology 
     to underserved communities.

     SEC. 322. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING IMMUNIZATION FUNDING.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) vaccines protect children and adults against serious 
     and potentially fatal diseases;
       (2) society saves up to $24 in medical and societal costs 
     for every dollar spent on vaccines;
       (3) every day, 11,000 babies are born--4,000,000 each 
     year--and each child needs up to 19 doses of vaccine by age 
     2;
       (4) approximately 1,000,000 2-year-olds have not received 
     all of the recommended vaccine doses;
       (5) the immunization program under section 317(j)(1) under 
     the Public Health Service Act, administered by the Centers 
     for Disease Control and Prevention, provides grants to States 
     and localities for critical activities including immunization 
     registries, outbreak control, provider education, outreach 
     efforts, and linkages with other public health and welfare 
     services;
       (6) Federal grants to States and localities for these 
     activities have declined from $271,000,000 in 1995 to 
     $139,000,000 in 2000;
       (7) because of these funding reductions States are 
     struggling to maintain immunization rates and have 
     implemented severe cuts to immunization delivery activities;
       (8) even with significant gains in national immunization 
     rates, underimmunized children still exist and there are a 
     number of subpopulations where coverage rates remain low and 
     are actually declining;
       (9) rates in many of the Nation's urban areas, including 
     Chicago and Houston, are unacceptably low; and
       (10) these pockets of need create pools of susceptible 
     children and increase the risk of dangerous disease 
     outbreaks.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in the resolution assume that Congress should 
     enact legislation that provides $214,000,000 in funding for 
     immunization grants under section 317 of the Public Health 
     Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247b) for infrastructure and delivery 
     activities, including targeted support for immunization 
     project areas with low or declining immunization rates or who 
     have subpopulations with special needs.

     SEC. 323. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING TAX CREDITS FOR SMALL 
                   BUSINESSES PROVIDING HEALTH INSURANCE TO LOW-
                   INCOME EMPLOYEES.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) 25,000,000 workers in the United States were uninsured 
     in 1997 and more than two-thirds of the uninsured workers 
     earn less than $20,000 annually, according to a Henry J. 
     Kaiser Family Foundation report;
       (2) the percentage of employees of small businesses who 
     have employer-sponsored health insurance coverage decreased 
     from 52 percent in 1996 to 47 percent in 1998; for the 
     smallest employers, those with 3 to 9 workers, the percentage 
     of employees covered by employer-sponsored health insurance 
     fell from 36 percent in 1996 to 31 percent in 1998;
       (3) between 1996 and 1998, health premiums for small 
     businesses increased 5.2 percent; premiums increased by 8 
     percent for the smallest employers, the highest increase 
     among all small businesses;
       (4) monthly family coverage for workers at firms with 3 to 
     9 employees cost $520 in 1998, compared to $462 for family 
     coverage for workers at large firms; and
       (5) only 39 percent of small businesses with a significant 
     percentage of low-income employees offer employer-provided 
     health insurance and such companies are half as likely to 
     offer health benefits to such employees as are companies that 
     have only a small percentage of low-income employees.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that Congress 
     should enact legislation that allows small businesses to 
     claim a tax credit when they provide health insurance to low-
     income employees.

     SEC. 324. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON FUNDING FOR CRIMINAL 
                   JUSTICE.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) our success in the fight against crime and improvements 
     in the administration of justice are the result of a 
     bipartisan effort; and
       (2) since 1993 the Congress and the President have 
     increased justice funding by 92 percent, and a strong 
     commitment to law enforcement and the administration of 
     justice remains appropriate.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that funds to 
     improve the justice system will be available as follows:
       (1) $665,000,000 for the expanded support of direct Federal 
     enforcement, adjudicative, and correctional-detention 
     activities.
       (2) $50,000,000 in additional funds to combat terrorism, 
     including cyber crime.
       (3) $41,000,000 in additional funds for construction costs 
     for the Federal Bureau of Prisons and the Federal Law 
     Enforcement Training Center.
       (4) $200,000,000 in support of Customs and Immigration and 
     Nationalization Service port of entry officers for the 
     development and implementation of the ACE computer system 
     designed to meet critical trade and border security needs.
       (5) Funding is available for the continuation of such 
     programs as: the Byrne Grant Program, Violence Against Women, 
     Juvenile Accountability Block Grants, First Responder 
     Training, Local Law Enforcement Block Grants, Weed and Seed, 
     Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth in Sentencing, State 
     Criminal Alien Assistance Program, Drug Courts, Residential 
     Substance Abuse Treatment, Crime Identification Technologies, 
     Bulletproof Vests, Counterterrorism, Interagency Law 
     Enforcement Coordination.

     SEC. 325. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE PELL GRANT.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) public investment in higher education yields a return 
     of several dollars for each dollar invested;
       (2) higher education promotes economic opportunity for 
     individuals; for example recipients of bachelor's degrees 
     earn an average of 75 percent per year more than those with 
     high school diplomas and experience half as much unemployment 
     as high school graduates;
       (3) access to a college education has become a hallmark of 
     American society, and is vital to upholding our belief in 
     equality of opportunity;
       (4) for a generation, the Federal Pell Grant has served as 
     an established and effective means of providing access to 
     higher education;
       (5) over the past decade, Pell Grant has failed to keep up 
     with inflation. Over the past 25 years, the value of the 
     average Pell Grant has decreased by 23 percent--it is now 
     worth only 77 percent of what Pell Grants were worth in 1975;
       (6) grant aid as a portion of student aid has fallen 
     significantly over the past 5 years. Grant aid used to 
     comprise 55 percent of total aid awarded and loans comprised 
     just over 40 percent. Now that trend has been reversed so 
     that loans comprise nearly 60 percent of total aid awarded 
     and grants only comprise 40 percent of total aid awarded;
       (7) the percentage of freshmen attending public and private 
     4-year institutions from families whose income is below the 
     national median has fallen since 1981.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that within the 
     discretionary allocation provided to the Committee on 
     Appropriations, the funding for the maximum Pell Grant award 
     should be at or above the level requested by the President.

     SEC. 326. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING COMPREHENSIVE PUBLIC 
                   EDUCATION REFORM.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
       (1) Recent scientific evidence demonstrates that enhancing 
     children's physical, social, emotional, and intellectual 
     development before the age of 6 results in tremendous 
     benefits throughout life.
       (2) Successful schools are led by well-trained, highly 
     qualified principals, but many principals do not get the 
     training in management skills that the principals need to 
     ensure their school provides an excellent education for every 
     child.
       (3) Good teachers are a crucial catalyst to quality 
     education, but 1 in 4 new teachers do not meet State 
     certification requirements; each year more than 50,000 
     underprepared teachers enter the classroom; and 12 percent of 
     new teachers have had no teacher training at all.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that the Federal 
     Government should support State and local educational 
     agencies engaged in comprehensive reform of their public 
     education system and that any public education reform should 
     include at least the following principles:
       (1) Every child should begin school ready to learn.
       (2) Training and development for principals and teachers 
     should be a priority.

     SEC. 327. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON PROVIDING ADEQUATE FUNDING 
                   FOR UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) United States international leadership is essential to 
     maintaining security and peace for all Americans;
       (2) such leadership depends on effective diplomacy as well 
     as a strong military;
       (3) effective diplomacy requires adequate resources both 
     for operations and security of United States embassies and 
     for international programs;
       (4) in addition to building peace, prosperity, and 
     democracy around the world, programs in the International 
     Affairs (150) budget serve United States interests by 
     ensuring better jobs and a higher standard of living, 
     promoting the health of our citizens and preserving our 
     natural environment, and protecting the rights and safety of 
     those who travel or do business overseas;
       (5) real spending for International Affairs has declined 
     more than 40 percent since the mid-1980's, at the same time 
     that major new challenges and opportunities have arisen from 
     the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the worldwide 
     trends toward democracy and free markets;

[[Page 5055]]

       (6) current ceilings on discretionary spending will impose 
     severe additional cuts in funding for International Affairs;
       (7) improved security for United States diplomatic missions 
     and personnel will place further strain on the International 
     Affairs budget absent significant additional resources;
       (8) the United States cannot reduce efforts to safeguard 
     nuclear materials in the former Soviet States or shortchange 
     initiatives aimed at maintaining stability on the Korean 
     peninsula, where 37,000 United States forces are deployed. We 
     cannot reduce support for peace in the Middle East or in 
     Northern Ireland or in the Balkans. We cannot stop fighting 
     terror or simply surrender to the spread of HIV/AIDS. We must 
     continue to support all of these things, which are difficult 
     to achieve without adequate and realistic funding levels; and
       (9) the President's request for funds for fiscal year 2001 
     would adequately finance our International Affairs programs 
     without detracting from our defense and domestic needs. It 
     would help keep America prosperous and secure. It would 
     enable us to leverage the contributions of allies and friends 
     on behalf of democracy and peace. It would allow us to 
     protect the interests of Americans who travel, study, or do 
     business overseas. It would do all these things and more for 
     about 1 penny of every dollar the Federal Government spends.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that additional 
     budgetary resources should be identified for function 150 to 
     enable successful United States international leadership.

     SEC. 328. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING THE HIV/AIDS CRISIS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
       (1) More than 16,000,000 people have been killed by 
     Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) since the epidemic 
     began.
       (2) 14,000,000 Africans have died as a result of the AIDS 
     epidemic. Eighty-four percent of the worldwide deaths from 
     AIDS have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa.
       (3) Each day, AIDS kills 5,500 Africans, and infects 11,000 
     more.
       (4) By the end of 2000, 10,400,000 children in sub-Saharan 
     Africa will have lost one or both parents, to AIDS.
       (5) Over 85 percent of the world's HIV-positive children 
     live in Africa.
       (6) Fewer than 5 percent of those living with AIDS in 
     Africa have access to even the most basic care.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that--
       (1) the functional totals underlying this resolution on the 
     budget assume that Congress has recognized the catastrophic 
     effects of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, particularly in sub-Saharan 
     Africa, and seeks to maximize the effectiveness of the United 
     States' efforts to combat the disease through any necessary 
     authorization or appropriations;
       (2) Congress should strengthen ongoing programs which 
     address education and prevention, testing, the care of AIDS 
     orphans, and improving home and community-based care options 
     for those living with AIDS; and
       (3) Congress should seek additional or new tools to combat 
     the epidemic, including initiatives to encourage vaccine 
     development and programs aimed at preventing mother-to-child 
     transmission of the disease.

     SEC. 329. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING TRIBAL COLLEGES.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
       (1) More than 26,500 students from 250 tribes nationwide 
     attend tribal colleges. The colleges serve students of all 
     ages, many of whom are moving from welfare to work. The vast 
     majority of tribal college students are first-generation 
     college students.
       (2) While annual appropriations for tribal colleges have 
     increased modestly in recent years, core operation funding 
     levels are still about half of the $6,000 per Indian student 
     level authorized by the Tribally Controlled College or 
     University Act.
       (3) Although tribal colleges received a $3,000,000 increase 
     in funding in fiscal year 2000, because of rising student 
     populations and other factors, these institutions may face an 
     actual per-student decrease in funding over fiscal year 1999.
       (4) Per-student funding for tribal colleges is roughly half 
     the amount given to mainstream community colleges.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that--
       (1) the Senate recognizes the funding difficulties faced by 
     tribal colleges and assumes that priority consideration will 
     be provided to them through funding for the Tribally 
     Controlled College and University Act, the 1994 Land Grant 
     Institutions, and title III of the Higher Education Act; and
       (2) such priority consideration reflects Congress' intent 
     to continue work toward current statutory Federal funding 
     goals for the tribal colleges.

     SEC. 330. SENSE OF THE SENATE TO PROVIDE RELIEF FROM THE 
                   MARRIAGE PENALTY.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) marriage is the foundation of the American society and 
     a key institution for preserving our values;
       (2) the tax code should not penalize those who choose to 
     marry;
       (3) a report to the Treasury Department's Office of Tax 
     Analysis estimates that in 1999, 48 percent of married 
     couples will pay a marriage penalty under the present tax 
     system;
       (4) the Congressional Budget Office found that the average 
     penalty amounts to $1,400 a year.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the level in this budget resolution assume that the 
     Congress shall--
       (1) pass marriage penalty tax relief legislation that 
     begins a phasedown of this penalty in 2001;
       (2) consider such legislation prior to April 15, 2000.

     SEC. 331. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE CONTINUED USE OF FEDERAL 
                   FUEL TAXES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND 
                   REHABILITATION OF OUR NATION'S HIGHWAYS, 
                   BRIDGES, AND TRANSIT SYSTEMS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) current law, as stipulated in the Transportation Equity 
     Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), requires all Federal 
     gasoline taxes be deposited into the Highway Trust Fund;
       (2) current law, as stipulated in TEA-21, guarantees that 
     all such deposits to the Highway Trust Fund are spent in full 
     on the construction and rehabilitation of our Nation's 
     highways, bridges, and transit systems;
       (3) the funding guarantees contained in TEA-21 are 
     essential to the ability of the Nation's Governors, highway 
     commissioners, and transit providers to address the growing 
     backlog of critical transportation investments in order to 
     stem the deterioration of our road and transit systems, 
     improve the safety of our highways, and reduce the growth of 
     congestion that is choking off economic growth in communities 
     across the Nation;
       (4) any effort to reduce the Federal gasoline tax or de-
     link the relationship between highway user fees and highway 
     spending pose a great danger to the integrity of the Highway 
     Trust Fund and the ability of the States to invest adequately 
     in our transportation infrastructure; and
       (5) proposals to reduce the Federal gasoline tax threaten 
     to endanger the spending levels guaranteed in TEA-21 while 
     providing no guarantee that consumers will experience any 
     reduction in price at the gas pump.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the functional totals in this budget resolution do not 
     assume the reduction of any Federal gasoline taxes on either 
     a temporary or permanent basis.

     SEC. 332. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION 
                   ENGINE.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the levels in this 
     resolution assume that the Senate will not, on behalf of Vice 
     President Al Gore, increase gasoline and diesel fuel taxes by 
     $1.50 per gallon effective July 1, 2000, and by an additional 
     $1.50 per gallon effective fiscal year 2005, as part of ``a 
     coordinated global program to accomplish the strategic goal 
     of completely eliminating the internal combustion engine 
     over, say, a twenty-five year period'' since ``their 
     cumulative impact on the global environment is posing a 
     mortal threat to the security of every nation that is more 
     deadly than that of any military enemy we are ever again 
     likely to confront''.

     SEC. 333. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF 
                   A NATIONAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM FOR LONG-
                   TERM CARE WORKERS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
       (1) The impending retirement of the baby boom generation 
     will greatly increase the demand and need for quality long-
     term care and it is incumbent on Congress and the President 
     to ensure that medicare and medicaid patients are protected 
     from abuse, neglect, and mistreatment.
       (2) Although the majority of long-term care facilities do 
     an excellent job in caring for elderly and disabled patients, 
     incidents of abuse and neglect and mistreatment do occur at 
     an unacceptable rate and are not limited to nursing homes 
     alone.
       (3) Current Federal and State safeguards are inadequate 
     because there is little or no information sharing between 
     States about known abusers and no common State procedures for 
     tracking abusers from State to State and facility to 
     facility.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the assumptions underlying the functional totals in this 
     concurrent resolution on the budget assume that a national 
     registry of abusive long-term care workers should be 
     established by building upon existing infrastructures at the 
     Federal and State levels that would enable long-term care 
     providers who participate in the medicare and medicaid 
     programs to conduct background checks on prospective 
     employees.

     SEC. 334. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING THE PRICE OF 
                   PRESCRIPTION DRUGS IN THE UNITED STATES.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
       (1) Today, two-thirds of senior citizens in the United 
     States have access to prescription drugs through health 
     insurance coverage.
       (2) However, it is difficult for many Americans, including 
     senior citizens, to afford the prescription drugs that they 
     need to stay healthy.
       (3) Many senior citizens in the United States leave the 
     country and go to Canada or Mexico to buy prescription drugs 
     that are developed, manufactured, and approved in the United 
     States in order to buy such drugs at lower prices than such 
     drugs are sold for in the United States.
       (4) According to the General Accounting Office, a consumer 
     in the United States pays on average \1/3\ more for a 
     prescription drug than a

[[Page 5056]]

     consumer pays for the same drug in another country.
       (5) The United States has made a strong commitment to 
     supporting the research and development of new drugs through 
     taxpayer-supported funding of the National Institutes of 
     Health, through the research and development tax credit, and 
     through other means.
       (6) The development of new drugs is important because the 
     use of such drugs enables people to live longer and lead 
     healthier, more productive lives.
       (7) Citizens of other countries should pay a portion of the 
     research and development costs for new drugs, or their fair 
     share of such costs, rather than just reap the benefits of 
     such drugs.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the budgetary levels in this resolution assume that the 
     cost disparity between identical prescription drugs sold in 
     the United States, Canada, and Mexico should be reduced or 
     eliminated.

     SEC. 335. SENSE OF THE SENATE AGAINST FEDERAL FUNDING OF 
                   SMOKE SHOPS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
       (1) Smoking begun by children during their teen years and 
     even earlier turns the lives of far too many Americans into 
     nightmares decades later, plagued by disease and premature 
     death.
       (2) The Federal Government should leave a legacy of more 
     healthy Americans and fewer victims of tobacco-related 
     illness.
       (3) Efforts by the Federal Government should seek to 
     protect young people from the dangers of smoking.
       (4) Discount tobacco stores, sometimes known as smoke 
     shops, operate to sell high volumes of cigarettes and other 
     tobacco products, often at significantly reduced prices, with 
     each tobacco outlet often selling millions of discount 
     cigarettes each year.
       (5) Studies by the Surgeon General and the Centers for 
     Disease Control and Prevention demonstrate that children are 
     particularly susceptible to price differentials in 
     cigarettes, such as those available through smoke shop 
     discounts.
       (6) The Department of Housing and Urban Development is 
     using Federal funds for grants to construct not less than 6 
     smoke shops or facilities that contain a smoke shop.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the budget levels in this resolution assume that no 
     Federal funds may be used by the Department of Housing and 
     Urban Development to provide any grant or other assistance to 
     construct, operate, or otherwise benefit a smoke shop or 
     other tobacco outlet.

     SEC. 336. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE NEED TO REDUCE 
                   GUN VIOLENCE IN AMERICA.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
       (1) On average, 12 children die from gun fire everyday in 
     America.
       (2) On May 20, 1999, the Senate passed the Violent and 
     Repeat Offender Accountability and Rehabilitation Act, by a 
     vote of 73 to 25, in part, to stem gun-related violence in 
     the United States.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in function 750 of this resolution assume 
     that Congress should--
       (1) pass the conference report to accompany H.R. 1501, the 
     Violent and Repeat Juvenile Offender Accountability and 
     Rehabilitation Act, including Senate-passed provisions, with 
     the purpose of limiting access to firearms by juveniles, 
     convicted felons, and other persons prohibited by law from 
     purchasing or possessing firearms; and
       (2) consider H.R. 1501 not later than April 20, 2000.

     SEC. 337. SENSE OF THE SENATE SUPPORTING ADDITIONAL FUNDING 
                   FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 FOR MEDICAL CARE FOR OUR 
                   NATION'S VETERANS.

       (a) It is the sense of the Senate that the provisions in 
     this resolution assume that if the Congressional Budget 
     Office determines there is an on-budget surplus for fiscal 
     year 2001, $500,000,000 of that surplus will be restored to 
     the programs cut in this amendment.
       (b) It is the sense of the Senate that the assumptions 
     underlying this budget resolution assume that none of these 
     offsets will come from defense or veterans, and to the extent 
     possible should come from administrative functions.

     SEC. 338. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING MEDICAL CARE FOR 
                   VETERANS.

       It is the sense of the Senate that--
       (1) the provisions of this resolution assume that if the 
     Congressional Budget Office determines there is an on-budget 
     surplus for fiscal year 2001, $500,000,000 of that surplus 
     will be restored to the programs cut by this amendment; and
       (2) the assumptions underlying this resolution assume that 
     none of the offsets made by this amendment will come from 
     defense or veterans and should, to the extent possible, come 
     from administrative functions.

     SEC. 339. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING INVESTMENT OF SOCIAL 
                   SECURITY TRUST FUNDS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) Government investment of the Social Security trust 
     funds in the stock market is a gamble Congress should be 
     unwilling to make on behalf of the millions who receive and 
     depend on Social Security to meet their retirement needs;
       (2) in 1999, the Senate voted 99-0 to oppose Government 
     investment of the Social Security trust funds in private 
     financial markets;
       (3) in addition to the unanimous opposition of the United 
     States Senate, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and 
     Securities and Exchange Commissioner Arthur Levitt also 
     oppose the idea; and
       (4) despite this opposition, and despite the dangers 
     inherent in having the Government invest Social Security 
     trust funds in private financial markets, President Clinton 
     has once again suggested, on page 37 of the Administration's 
     proposed fiscal year 2001 Federal budget, that the Government 
     invest part of the Social Security trust funds in corporate 
     equities.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the assumptions underlying the functional totals in this 
     resolution assume that the Federal Government should not 
     directly invest contributions made to the Federal Old-Age and 
     Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability 
     Insurance Trust Fund established under section 201 of the 
     Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401), or any interest derived 
     from those contributions, in private financial markets.

     SEC. 340. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING DIGITAL OPPORTUNITY.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
       (1) A digital divide exists in America. Low-income, urban 
     and rural families are less likely to have access to the 
     Internet and computers. African American and Hispanic 
     families are only \2/5\ as likely to have Internet access as 
     white families. Access by Native Americans to the Internet 
     and to computers is statistically negligible.
       (2) Regardless of income level, Americans living in rural 
     areas lag behind in Internet access. Individuals with lower 
     incomes who live in rural areas are half as likely to have 
     Internet access as individuals who live in urban areas.
       (3) The digital divide for the poorest Americans has grown 
     by 29 percent since 1997.
       (4) Access to computers and the Internet and the ability to 
     use this technology effectively is becoming increasingly 
     important for full participation in America's economic, 
     political and social life.
       (5) Unequal access to technology and high-tech skills by 
     income, educational level, race and geography could deepen 
     and reinforce the divisions that exist within American 
     society.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the functional totals underlying this resolution on the 
     budget assume that--
       (1) to ensure that all children are computer literate by 
     the time they finish the eighth grade, regardless of race, 
     ethnicity, gender, income, geography or disability, to 
     broaden access to information technologies, to provide 
     workers, teachers and students with information technology 
     training, and to promote innovative online content and 
     software applications that will improve commerce, education 
     and quality of life, initiatives that increase digital 
     opportunity should be provided for as follows:
       (A) $200,000,000 in tax incentives should be provided to 
     encourage private sector donation of high-quality computers, 
     sponsorship of community technology centers, training, 
     technical services and computer repair;
       (B) $450,000,000 should be provided for teacher training;
       (C) $150,000,000 for new teacher training;
       (D) $400,000,000 should be provided for school technology 
     and school libraries;
       (E) $20,000,000 should be provided to place computers and 
     trained personnel in Boys & Girls Clubs;
       (F) $25,000,000 should be provided to create an E-Corps 
     within Americorps;
       (G) $100,000,000 should be provided to create 1,000 
     Community Technology Centers in low-income urban and rural 
     communities;
       (H) $50,000,000 should be provided for public/private 
     partnerships to expand home access to computers and the 
     Internet for low-income families;
       (I) $45,000,000 should be provided to promote innovative 
     applications of information and communications technology for 
     underserved communities;
       (J) $10,000,000 should be provided to prepare Native 
     Americans for careers in Information Technology and other 
     technical fields; and
       (2) all Americans should have access to broadband 
     telecommunications capability as soon as possible and as 
     such, initiatives that increase broadband deployment should 
     be funded, including $25,000,000 to accelerate private sector 
     deployment of broadband and networks in underserved urban and 
     rural communities.

     SEC. 341. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the levels in this 
     budget resolution assume that among its reform options, 
     Congress should explore a medicare prescription drug proposal 
     that--
       (1) is voluntary;
       (2) increases access for all medicare beneficiaries;
       (3) is designed to provide meaningful protection and 
     bargaining power for medicare beneficiaries in obtaining 
     prescription drugs;
       (4) is affordable for all medicare beneficiaries and for 
     the medicare program;
       (5) is administered using private sector entities and 
     competitive purchasing techniques;
       (6) is consistent with broader medicare reform;
       (7) preserves and protects the financial integrity of the 
     medicare trust funds;
       (8) does not increase medicare beneficiary premiums; and
       (9) provides a prescription drug benefit as soon as 
     possible.

     SEC. 342. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING FUNDING FOR NEW 
                   EDUCATION PROGRAMS.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the budgetary levels in 
     this resolution assume that Congress' first priority should 
     be to fully fund the

[[Page 5057]]

     programs described under part B of the Individuals with 
     Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1411 et seq.) at the 
     originally promised level of 40 percent before Federal funds 
     are appropriated for new education programs.

     SEC. 343. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING ENFORCEMENT OF 
                   FEDERAL FIREARMS LAWS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
       (1) The Clinton Administration has failed to adequately 
     enforce Federal firearms laws. Between 1992 and 1998, 
     Triggerlock gun prosecutions--prosecutions of defendants who 
     use a firearm in the commission of a felony--dropped nearly 
     50 percent, from 7,045 to approximately 3,800.
       (2) The decline in Federal firearms prosecutions was not 
     due to a lack of adequate resources. During the period when 
     Federal firearms prosecutions decreased nearly 50 percent, 
     the overall budget of the Department of Justice increased 54 
     percent.
       (3) It is a Federal crime to possess a firearm on school 
     grounds under section 922(q) of title 18, United States Code. 
     The Clinton Department of Justice prosecuted only 8 cases 
     under this provision of law during 1998, even though more 
     than 6,000 students brought firearms to school that year. The 
     Clinton Administration prosecuted only 5 such cases during 
     1997.
       (4) It is a Federal crime to transfer a firearm to a 
     juvenile under section 922(x) of title 18, United States 
     Code. The Clinton Department of Justice prosecuted only 6 
     cases under this provision of law during 1998 and only 5 
     during 1997.
       (5) It is a Federal crime to transfer or possess a 
     semiautomatic assault weapon under section 922(v) of title 
     18, United States Code. The Clinton Department of Justice 
     prosecuted only 4 cases under this provision of law during 
     1998 and only 4 during 1997.
       (6) It is a Federal crime for any person ``who has been 
     adjudicated as a mental defective or who has been committed 
     to a mental institution'' to possess or purchase a firearm 
     under section 922(g) of title 18, United States Code. Despite 
     this Federal law, mental health adjudications are not placed 
     on the national instant criminal background system 
     established under section 103(b) of the Brady Handgun 
     Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 922 note).
       (7) It is a Federal crime for any person knowingly to make 
     any false statement in the attempted purchase of a firearm 
     under section 922(a)(6) of title 18, United States Code. It 
     is also a Federal crime for convicted felons to possess or 
     purchase a firearm under section 922(g) of title 18, United 
     States Code.
       (8) More than 500,000 convicted felons and other prohibited 
     purchasers have been prevented from buying firearms from 
     licensed dealers since the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention 
     Act was enacted. When these felons attempted to purchase a 
     firearm, they violated section 922(a)(6) of title 18, United 
     States Code, by making a false statement under oath that they 
     were not disqualified from purchasing a firearm. Nonetheless, 
     of the more than 500,000 violations, only approximately 200 
     of the felons have been referred to the Department of Justice 
     for prosecution.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the assumptions underlying the functional totals in this 
     concurrent resolution on the budget assume that Federal funds 
     will be used for an effective law enforcement strategy 
     requiring a commitment to enforcing existing Federal firearms 
     laws by--
       (1) designating not less than 1 Assistant United States 
     Attorney in each district to prosecute Federal firearms 
     violations and thereby expand Project Exile nationally;
       (2) upgrading the national instant criminal background 
     system established under section 103(b) of the Brady Handgun 
     Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 922 note) by encouraging 
     States to place mental health adjudications on that system 
     and by improving the overall speed and efficiency of that 
     system; and
       (3) providing incentive grants to States to encourage 
     States to impose mandatory minimum sentences for firearm 
     offenses based on section 924(c) of title 18, United States 
     Code, and to prosecute those offenses in State court.

     SEC. 344. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE CENSUS.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the levels in this 
     resolution and legislation enacted pursuant to this 
     resolution assume that no American will be prosecuted, fined 
     or in anyway harassed by the Federal Government or its agents 
     for failure to respond to any census questions which refer to 
     an individual's race, national origin, living conditions, 
     personal habits or mental and/or physical condition, but that 
     all Americans are encouraged to send in their census forms.

     SEC. 345. SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT ANY INCREASE IN THE 
                   MINIMUM WAGE SHOULD BE ACCOMPANIED BY TAX 
                   RELIEF FOR SMALL BUSINESSES.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the functional totals 
     underlying this resolution on the budget assume that the 
     minimum wage should be increased as provided for in amendment 
     number 2547, the Domenici and others amendment to S. 625, the 
     Bankruptcy Reform legislation.

     SEC. 346. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING THE MINIMUM WAGE.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the levels in this 
     resolution assume that Congress should enact legislation to 
     amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et 
     seq.) to increase the Federal minimum wage by $1.00 over 1 
     year with a $0.50 increase effective May 2, 2000 and another 
     $0.50 increase effective on May 2, 2001.

     SEC. 347. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING FUNDING FOR THE 
                   PARTICIPATION OF MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED 
                   SERVICES IN THE THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN.

       It is the sense of Congress that the levels of funding for 
     the defense category in this resolution--
       (1) assume that members of the Armed Forces are to be 
     authorized to participate in the Thrift Savings Plan; and
       (2) provide the $980,000,000 necessary to offset the 
     reduced tax revenue resulting from that participation through 
     fiscal year 2009.

     SEC. 348. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING PROTECTING THE 
                   SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUNDS.

       It is the sense of the Senate that the levels in this 
     resolution assume that the Congress shall pass legislation 
     which provides for sequestration to reduce Federal spending 
     by the amount necessary to ensure that, in any fiscal year, 
     the Social Security surpluses are used only for the payment 
     of Social Security benefits, retirement security, Social 
     Security reform, or to reduce the Federal debt held by the 
     public.

     SEC. 349. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING REGULATION OF 
                   TOBACCO PRODUCTS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
       (1) Cigarette smoking and tobacco use is the single most 
     preventable cause of death and disability in the United 
     States.
       (2) Cigarette smoking and tobacco use cause approximately 
     400,000 deaths each year in the United States.
       (3) Health care costs associated with treating tobacco-
     related diseases are $80,000,000,000 per year, and almost 
     half of such costs are paid for by taxpayer-financed 
     government health care programs.
       (4) In spite of the well established dangers of cigarette 
     smoking and tobacco use, there is no Federal agency that has 
     authority to regulate the manufacture, sale, distribution, 
     and use of tobacco products.
       (5) Major tobacco companies spend over $5,600,000,000 each 
     year ($15,000,000 each day) to promote the use of tobacco 
     products.
       (6) Ninety percent of adult smokers first started smoking 
     before the age of 18.
       (7) Each day 3,000 children become regular smokers and \1/
     3\ of such children will die of diseases associated with the 
     use of tobacco products.
       (8) The Food and Drug Administration regulates the 
     manufacture, sale, distribution, and use of nicotine-
     containing products used as substitutes for cigarette smoking 
     and tobacco use and should be granted the authority to 
     regulate tobacco products.
       (9) Congress should restrict youth access to tobacco 
     products and ensure that tobacco products meet minimum safety 
     standards.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the budgetary levels in this resolution assume that--
       (1) the Food and Drug Administration is the most qualified 
     Federal agency to regulate tobacco products; and
       (2) Congress should enact legislation in the year 2000 that 
     grants the Food and Drug Administration the authority to 
     regulate tobacco products.

     SEC. 350. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING AFTER SCHOOL 
                   PROGRAMS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
       (1) The demand for after school education is very high, 
     with more than 1,000,000 students waiting to get into such 
     programs.
       (2) After school programs improve educational achievement 
     and have widespread support, with over 90 percent of the 
     American people supporting such programs.
       (3) 450 of the Nation's leading police chiefs, sheriffs, 
     and prosecutors, along with the presidents of the Fraternal 
     Order of Police, and the International Union of Police 
     Associations, support government funding of after school 
     programs.
       (4) Many of our Nation's governors endorse increasing the 
     number of after school programs through a Federal and State 
     partnership.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that this resolution assumes that the President's level of 
     funding for after school programs in fiscal year 2001 will be 
     provided, which will accommodate the current need for after 
     school programs.

     SEC. 351. SENSE OF SENATE REGARDING CASH BALANCE PENSION PLAN 
                   CONVERSIONS.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following:
       (1) Defined benefit pension plans are guaranteed by the 
     Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and provide a lifetime 
     benefit for a beneficiary and spouse.
       (2) Defined benefit pension plans provide meaningful 
     retirement benefits to rank and file workers, since such 
     plans are generally funded by employer contributions.
       (3) Employers should be encouraged to establish and 
     maintain defined benefit pension plans.
       (4) An increasing number of major employers have been 
     converting their traditional defined benefit plans to ``cash 
     balance'' or other hybrid defined benefit plans.
       (5) Under current law, employers are not required to 
     provide plan participants with meaningful disclosure of the 
     impact of converting a traditional defined benefit plan to a 
     ``cash balance'' or other hybrid formula.
       (6) For a number of years after a conversion, the cash 
     balance or other hybrid benefit formula may result in a 
     period of ``wear away'' during which older and longer service 
     participants earn no additional benefits.

[[Page 5058]]

       (7) Federal law should continue to prohibit pension plan 
     participants from being discriminated against on the basis of 
     age in the provision of pension benefits.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the levels in this resolution assume that pension plan 
     participants whose plans are changed to cause older or longer 
     service workers to earn less retirement income, including 
     conversions to ``cash balance plans,'' should receive 
     additional protection than what is currently provided, and 
     Congress should act this year to address this important 
     issue. In particular, at a minimum--
       (1) all pension plan participants should receive adequate, 
     accurate, and timely notice of any change to a plan that will 
     cause participants to earn less retirement income in the 
     future; and
       (2) pension plans that are changed to a cash balance or 
     other hybrid formula should not be permitted to ``wear away'' 
     participants' benefits in such a manner that older and longer 
     service participants earn no additional pension benefits for 
     a period of time after the change.

     SEC. 352. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING UNINSURED AND LOW-
                   INCOME INDIVIDUALS IN MEDICALLY UNDERSERVED 
                   COMMUNITIES.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
       (1) the uninsured population in the United States continues 
     to grow at over 100,000 individuals per month, and is 
     estimated to reach over 53,000,000 people by 2007;
       (2) the growth in the uninsured population continues 
     despite public and private efforts to increase health 
     insurance coverage;
       (3) nearly 80 percent of the uninsured population are 
     members of working families who cannot afford health 
     insurance or cannot access employer-provided health insurance 
     plans;
       (4) minority populations, rural residents, and single-
     parent families represent a disproportionate number of the 
     uninsured population;
       (5) the problem of health care access for the uninsured 
     population is compounded in many urban and rural communities 
     by a lack of providers who are available to serve both 
     insured and uninsured populations;
       (6) community, migrant, homeless, and public housing health 
     centers have proven uniquely qualified to address the lack of 
     adequate health care services for uninsured populations, 
     serving over 4,500,000 uninsured patients in 1999, including 
     over 1,000,000 new uninsured patients who have sought care 
     from such centers in the last 3 years;
       (7) health centers care for nearly 7,000,000 minorities, 
     nearly 600,000 farmworkers, and more than 500,000 homeless 
     individuals each year;
       (8) health centers provide cost-effective comprehensive 
     primary and preventive care to uninsured individuals for less 
     than $1.00 per day, or $350 annually, and help to reduce the 
     inappropriate use of costly emergency rooms and inpatient 
     hospital care;
       (9) current resources only allow health centers to serve 10 
     percent of the Nation's 44,000,000 uninsured individuals;
       (10) past investments to increase health center access have 
     resulted in better health, an improved quality of life for 
     all Americans, and a reduction in national health care 
     expenditures; and
       (11) Congress can act now to increase access to health care 
     services for uninsured and low-income people together with or 
     in advance of health care coverage proposals by expanding the 
     availability of services at community, migrant, homeless, and 
     public housing health centers.
       (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that the functional totals underlying this resolution on the 
     budget assume that--
       (1) appropriations for consolidated health centers under 
     section 330 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b) 
     should be increased by 100 percent over the next 5 fiscal 
     years in order to double the number of individuals who 
     receive health care services at community, migrant, homeless, 
     and public housing health centers; and
       (2) appropriations for consolidated health centers should 
     be increased by $150,000,000 in fiscal year 2001 over the 
     amount appropriated for such centers in fiscal year 2000.

     SEC. 353. SENSE OF THE SENATE CONCERNING FISCAL YEAR 2001 
                   FUNDING FOR THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD.

       (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:
       (1) The United States Coast Guard in 1999 saved 
     approximately 3,800 lives in providing the essential service 
     of maritime safety.
       (2) The United States Coast Guard in 1999 prevented 111,689 
     pounds of cocaine and 28,872 pounds of marijuana from 
     entering the United States in providing the essential service 
     of maritime security.
       (3) The United States Coast Guard in 1999 boarded more than 
     14,000 fishing vessels to check for compliance with safety 
     and environmental laws in providing the essential service of 
     the protection of natural resources.
       (4) The United States Coast Guard in 1999 ensured the safe 
     passage of nearly 1,000,000 commercial vessel transits 
     through congested harbors with vessel traffic services in 
     providing the essential service of maritime mobility.
       (5) The United States Coast Guard in 1999 sent 
     international training teams to help more than 50 countries 
     develop their maritime services in providing the essential 
     service national defense.
       (6) Each year, the United States Coast Guard ensures the 
     safe passage of more than 200,000,000 tons of cargo cross the 
     Great Lakes including iron ore, coal, and limestone. Shipping 
     on the Great Lakes faces a unique challenge because the 
     shipping season begins and ends in ice anywhere from 3 to 15 
     feet thick. The ice-breaking vessel MACKINAW has allowed 
     commerce to continue under these conditions. However, the 
     productive life of the MACKINAW is nearing an end. The Coast 
     Guard has committed to keeping the vessel in service until 
     2006 when a replacement vessel is projected to be in service, 
     but to meet that deadline, funds must be provided for the 
     Coast Guard in fiscal year 2001 to provide for the 
     procurement of a multipurpose-design heavy icebreaker.
       (7) Without adequate funding, the United States Coast Guard 
     would have to radically reduce the level of service it 
     provides to the American public.
       (b) Adjustment in Budget Levels.--
       (1) Increase in funding for transportation.--
     Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, the 
     amounts specified in section 103(8) of this resolution for 
     budget authority and outlays for Transportation (budget 
     function 400) for fiscal year 2001 shall be increased as 
     follows:
       (A) The amount of budget authority for that fiscal year, by 
     $300,000,000.
       (B) The amount of outlays for that fiscal year, by 
     $300,000,000.
       (2) Offsetting decrease in funding for allowances.--
     Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, the 
     amounts specified in section 103(19) of this resolution for 
     budget authority and outlays for Allowances (budget function 
     920) for fiscal year 2001 shall be decreased as follows:
       (A) The amount of budget authority for that fiscal year, by 
     $300,000,000.
       (B) The amount of outlays for that fiscal year, by 
     $300,000,000.
       (c) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate 
     that--
       (1) the provisions of this resolution, as modified by 
     subsection (b), should provide additional budget authority 
     and outlay authority for the United States Coast Guard for 
     fiscal year 2001 such that the amount of such authority in 
     fiscal year 2001 exceeds the amount of such authority for 
     fiscal year 2000 by $300,000,000; and
       (2) any level of such authority in fiscal year 2001 below 
     the level described in paragraph (1) would require the Coast 
     Guard to--
       (A) close numerous stations and utilize remaining assets 
     only for emergency situations;
       (B) reduce the number of personnel of an already 
     streamlined workforce;
       (C) curtail its capacity to carry out emergency search and 
     rescue; and
       (D) reduce operations in a manner that would have a 
     detrimental impact on the sustainability of valuable fish 
     stocks in the North Atlantic and Pacific Northwest and its 
     capacity to stem the flow of illicit drugs and illegal 
     immigration into the United States.

                          ____________________