[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 146 (2000), Part 16]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page 23725]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]



                       WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTIONS

                                 ______
                                 

                       HON. CONSTANCE A. MORELLA

                              of maryland

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, October 19, 2000

  Mrs. MORELLA. Mr. Speaker, today, I introduced legislation in 
Congress amending the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) to restore 
protections for federal employees who risk their jobs by disclosing 
waste, fraud, abuse or violations of law they witness on the job. This 
legislation is critical to restore the flow of information to Congress 
and the public about wrongdoing within the government. It is necessary 
because the original congressional intent has been partially nullified 
by certain judicial decisions.
  In 1989, Congress unanimously passed the Whistleblower Protection Act 
(WPA) and strengthened it in 1994. The new bill closes judicially 
created loopholes that have made the law useless in most circumstances. 
Recent decisions by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have 
denied protection for disclosures made as part of an employee's job 
duties or within the chain of command. The bill restores coverage in 
over 90 percent of the situations where it counts most for federal 
workers to have free speech rights--when they defend the public on the 
job.
  The bill also makes permanent a free speech shield known as the 
``anti-gag statute'' that Congress has passed annually for the last 13 
years. It outlaws nondisclosure rules, agreements and other forms of 
gag orders that would cancel rights in the Whistleblower Protection Act 
and other good government statutes. In particular, it upholds the 
supremacy of a long-established law that workers have a right to notice 
that information is classified as secret for national security 
interests, before they can be held liable for releasing it. The 
necessity for the bill was increased last week by passage of a little 
noticed provision in the Intelligence Authorization Act for 2001. That 
provision functionally could make whistleblowers liable for criminal 
prosecution, based on speculation that unmarked information were 
classified.
  We must reaffirm our support for whistleblowers. We made a serious 
commitment to federal workers in 1989 and Congress must ensure those 
protections stay in place. Congress must demonstrate once again its 
support for federal workers who risk everything to defend the public 
against fraud, waste, and abuse.

                          ____________________