[Congressional Record (Bound Edition), Volume 145 (1999), Part 14]
[House]
[Pages 20056-20098]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]



  CONFERENCE REPORT ON S. 507, WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1999

  Mr. SHUSTER submitted the following conference report and statement 
on the Senate bill (S. 507) to provide for the conservation and 
development of water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary 
of the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers 
and harbors of the United States, and for other purposes:

                    Conference Report (H. Rept. 298)

       The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the 
     two Houses on the amendment of the House to the bill (S. 
     507), to provide for the conservation and development of 
     water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of 
     the Army to construct various projects for improvements to 
     rivers and harbors of the United States, and for other 
     purposes, having met, after full and free conference, have 
     agreed to recommend and do recommend to their respective 
     Houses as follows:
       That the Senate recede from its disagreement to the 
     amendment of the House to the text of the bill and agree to 
     the same with an amendment as follows:
       In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the House 
     amendment, insert the following:

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

       (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1999''.
       (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act 
     is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Small flood control projects.
Sec. 103. Small bank stabilization projects.
Sec. 104. Small navigation projects.
Sec. 105. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
              environment.
Sec. 106. Small aquatic ecosystem restoration projects.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Small flood control authority.
Sec. 202. Use of non-Federal funds for compiling and disseminating 
              information on floods and flood damage.
Sec. 203. Contributions by States and political subdivisions.
Sec. 204. Sediment decontamination technology.
Sec. 205. Control of aquatic plants.
Sec. 206. Use of continuing contracts for construction of certain 
              projects.
Sec. 207. Water resources development studies for the Pacific region.
Sec. 208. Everglades and south Florida ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 209. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 210. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 211. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 212. Flood mitigation and riverine restoration program.
Sec. 213. Shore management program.
Sec. 214. Shore damage prevention or mitigation.
Sec. 215. Shore protection.

[[Page 20057]]

Sec. 216. Flood prevention coordination.
Sec. 217. Disposal of dredged material on beaches.
Sec. 218. Annual passes for recreation.
Sec. 219. Nonstructural flood control projects.
Sec. 220. Lakes program.
Sec. 221. Enhancement of fish and wildlife resources.
Sec. 222. Purchase of American-made equipment and products.
Sec. 223. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
              interests.
Sec. 224. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 225. Recreation user fees.
Sec. 226. Small storm damage reduction projects.
Sec. 227. Use of private enterprises.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway wildlife mitigation, Alabama and 
              Mississippi.
Sec. 302. Ouzinkie Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 303. St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, Alaska.
Sec. 304. Loggy Bayou, Red River below Denison Dam, Arkansas, 
              Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Sec. 305. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 306. San Lorenzo River, California.
Sec. 307. Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 308. Delaware River mainstem and channel deepening, Delaware, New 
              Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
Sec. 309. Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sec. 310. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 311. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 312. Lee County, Captiva Island segment, Florida, periodic beach 
              nourishment.
Sec. 313. Fort Pierce, Florida.
Sec. 314. Nassau County, Florida.
Sec. 315. Miami Harbor channel, Florida.
Sec. 316. St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida.
Sec. 317. Milo Creek, Idaho.
Sec. 318. Lake Michigan, Illinois.
Sec. 319. Springfield, Illinois.
Sec. 320. Ogden Dunes, Indiana.
Sec. 321. Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana.
Sec. 322. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 323. Dubuque, Iowa.
Sec. 324. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 325. Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
Sec. 326. Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Louisiana.
Sec. 327. Twelve-Mile Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 328. West bank of the Mississippi River (east of Harvey Canal), 
              Louisiana.
Sec. 329. Tolchester Channel S-Turn, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sec. 330. Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan.
Sec. 331. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 332. Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri.
Sec. 333. Meramec River basin, Valley Park Levee, Missouri.
Sec. 334. Missouri River mitigation project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, 
              and Nebraska.
Sec. 335. Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska.
Sec. 336. Absecon Island, New Jersey.
Sec. 337. New York Harbor and adjacent channels, Port Jersey, New 
              Jersey.
Sec. 338. Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 339. Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay channels, New York and New 
              Jersey.
Sec. 340. New York City watershed.
Sec. 341. New York State canal system.
Sec. 342. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, New York.
Sec. 343. Broken Bow Lake, Red River basin, Oklahoma.
Sec. 344. Willamette River temperature control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
              Oregon.
Sec. 345. Curwensville Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 346. Delaware River, Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Sec. 347. Mussers Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 348. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 349. Nine Mile Run, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 350. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 351. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 352. Fox Point hurricane barrier, Providence, Rhode Island.
Sec. 353. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.
Sec. 354. Clear Creek, Texas.
Sec. 355. Cypress Creek, Texas.
Sec. 356. Dallas floodway extension, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 357. Upper Jordan River, Utah.
Sec. 358. Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.
Sec. 359. Columbia River channel, Washington and Oregon.
Sec. 360. Greenbrier River basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 361. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 362. Moorefield, West Virginia.
Sec. 363. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 364. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 365. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 366. American and Sacramento Rivers, California.
Sec. 367. Martin, Kentucky.
Sec. 368. Southern West Virginia pilot program.
Sec. 369. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Jackson, Alabama.
Sec. 370. Tropicana Wash and Flamingo Wash, Nevada.
Sec. 371. Comite River, Louisiana.
Sec. 372. St. Marys River, Michigan.
Sec. 373. Charlevoix, Michigan.
Sec. 374. White River basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 375. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma, water conveyance facilities.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 401. Deep draft harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 402. Boydsville, Arkansas.
Sec. 403. Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 404. Del Norte County, California.
Sec. 405. Frazier Creek, Tulare County, California.
Sec. 406. Mare Island Strait, California.
Sec. 407. Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, California.
Sec. 408. Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.
Sec. 409. Whitewater River basin, California.
Sec. 410. Destin-Noriega Point, Florida.
Sec. 411. Little Econlackhatchee River basin, Florida.
Sec. 412. Port Everglades, Broward County, Florida.
Sec. 413. Lake Allatoona, Etowah River, and Little River watershed, 
              Georgia.
Sec. 414. Boise, Idaho.
Sec. 415. Goose Creek watershed, Oakley, Idaho.
Sec. 416. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 417. Snake River, Lewiston, Idaho.
Sec. 418. Snake River and Payette River, Idaho.
Sec. 419. Upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and 
              Wisconsin.
Sec. 420. Cameron Parish west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.
Sec. 421. Coastal Louisiana.
Sec. 422. Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana.
Sec. 423. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway ecosystem, Chef Menteur to Sabine 
              River, Louisiana.
Sec. 424. Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts.
Sec. 425. Westport, Massachusetts.
Sec. 426. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 427. St. Clair Shores, Michigan.
Sec. 428. Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan, and Toledo Harbor, Ohio.
Sec. 429. Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi.
Sec. 430. Tunica Lake weir, Mississippi.
Sec. 431. Yellowstone River, Montana.
Sec. 432. Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.
Sec. 433. Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Sec. 434. Cayuga Creek, New York.
Sec. 435. Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont.
Sec. 436. Oswego River basin, New York.
Sec. 437. White Oak River, North Carolina.
Sec. 438. Arcola Creek watershed, Madison, Ohio.
Sec. 439. Cleveland harbor, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sec. 440. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio.
Sec. 441. Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan.
Sec. 442. Schuylkill River, Norristown, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 443. South Carolina coastal areas.
Sec. 444. Santee Delta focus area, South Carolina.
Sec. 445. Waccamaw River, South Carolina.
Sec. 446. Day County, South Dakota.
Sec. 447. Niobrara River and Missouri River, South Dakota.
Sec. 448. Corpus Christi, Texas.
Sec. 449. Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney Fork Cut), Texas.
Sec. 450. Mouth of Colorado River, Texas.
Sec. 451. Santa Clara River, Utah.
Sec. 452. Mount St. Helens, Washington.
Sec. 453. Kanawha River, Fayette County, West Virginia.
Sec. 454. West Virginia ports.
Sec. 455. John Glenn Great Lakes basin program.
Sec. 456. Great Lakes navigational system.
Sec. 457. Nutrient loading resulting from dredged material disposal.
Sec. 458. Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers levees and streambanks 
              protection.
Sec. 459. Upper Mississippi River comprehensive plan.
Sec. 460. Susquehanna River and Upper Chesapeake Bay.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 501. Corps assumption of NRCS projects.
Sec. 502. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 503. Contaminated sediment dredging technology.
Sec. 504. Dam safety.
Sec. 505. Great Lakes remedial action plans.
Sec. 506. Projects for improvement of the environment.
Sec. 507. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 508. Measurements of Lake Michigan diversions, Illinois.
Sec. 509. Upper Mississippi River environmental management program.
Sec. 510. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 511. Water control management.
Sec. 512. Beneficial use of dredged material.
Sec. 513. Design and construction assistance.
Sec. 514. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 515. Irrigation diversion protection and fisheries enhancement 
              assistance.
Sec. 516. Innovative technologies for watershed restoration.
Sec. 517. Expedited consideration of certain projects.

[[Page 20058]]

Sec. 518. Dog River, Alabama.
Sec. 519. Levees in Elba and Geneva, Alabama.
Sec. 520. Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah.
Sec. 521. Beaver Lake, Arkansas, water supply storage reallocation.
Sec. 522. Beaver Lake trout production facility, Arkansas.
Sec. 523. Chino dairy preserve, California.
Sec. 524. Orange and San Diego Counties, California.
Sec. 525. Rush Creek, Novato, California.
Sec. 526. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 527. Lower St. Johns River Basin, Florida.
Sec. 528. Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, Georgia.
Sec. 529. Comprehensive flood impact response modeling system, 
              Coralville Reservoir and Iowa River watershed, Iowa.
Sec. 530. Additional construction assistance in Illinois.
Sec. 531. Kanopolis Lake, Kansas.
Sec. 532. Southern and Eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 533. Southeast Louisiana.
Sec. 534. Snug Harbor, Maryland.
Sec. 535. Welch Point, Elk River, Cecil County, and Chesapeake City, 
              Maryland.
Sec. 536. Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts.
Sec. 537. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 538. Beaver branch of Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
Sec. 539. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River water levels, New York.
Sec. 540. New York-New Jersey Harbor, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 541. Sea Gate Reach, Coney Island, New York, New York.
Sec. 542. Woodlawn, New York.
Sec. 543. Floodplain mapping, New York.
Sec. 544. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ottawa County, Ohio.
Sec. 545. Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
Sec. 546. Skinner Butte Park, Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 547. Willamette River Basin, Oregon.
Sec. 548. Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 549. Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 550. Point Marion Lock and Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 551. Seven Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 552. Southeastern Pennsylvania.
Sec. 553. Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna, Pennsylvania, watershed 
              management and restoration study.
Sec. 554. Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 555. Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota, study.
Sec. 556. North Padre Island storm damage reduction and environmental 
              restoration project.
Sec. 557. Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 558. Mississippi River Commission.
Sec. 559. Coastal aquatic habitat management.
Sec. 560. Abandoned and inactive noncoal mine restoration.
Sec. 561. Beneficial use of waste tire rubber.
Sec. 562. Site designation.
Sec. 563. Land conveyances.
Sec. 564. McNary Pool, Washington.
Sec. 565. Namings.
Sec. 566. Folsom Dam and Reservoir additional storage and additional 
              flood control studies.
Sec. 567. Wallops Island, Virginia.
Sec. 568. Detroit River, Michigan.
Sec. 569. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 570. Alaska.
Sec. 571. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 572. Sacramento Metropolitan Area watershed restoration, 
              California.
Sec. 573. Onondaga Lake, New York.
Sec. 574. East Lynn Lake, West Virginia.
Sec. 575. Eel River, California.
Sec. 576. North Little Rock, Arkansas.
Sec. 577. Upper Mississippi River, Mississippi Place, St. Paul, 
              Minnesota.
Sec. 578. Dredging of salt ponds in the State of Rhode Island.
Sec. 579. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 580. Cumberland, Maryland, flood project mitigation.
Sec. 581. City of Miami Beach, Florida.
Sec. 582. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake 
              Rivers salmon survival.
Sec. 583. Larkspur Ferry Channel, California.
Sec. 584. Holes Creek flood control project, Ohio.
Sec. 585. San Jacinto disposal area, Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 586. Water monitoring station.
Sec. 587. Overflow management facility, Rhode Island.
Sec. 588. Lower Chena River, Alaska.
Sec. 589. Numana Dam Fish passage, Nevada.
Sec. 590. Embrey Dam, Virginia.
Sec. 591. Environmental remediation, Front Royal, Virginia.
Sec. 592. Mississippi.
Sec. 593. Central New Mexico.
Sec. 594. Ohio.
Sec. 595. Rural Nevada and Montana.
Sec. 596. Phoenix, Arizona.
Sec. 597. National Harbor, Maryland.

  TITLE VI--CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
     STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION

Sec. 601. Definitions.
Sec. 602. Terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration.
Sec. 603. South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust 
              Fund.
Sec. 604. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
              Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.
Sec. 605. Transfer of Federal land to State of South Dakota.
Sec. 606. Transfer of Corps of Engineers land for Indian tribes.
Sec. 607. Administration.
Sec. 608. Study.
Sec. 609. Authorization of appropriations.
                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

     SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

       (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--The following projects 
     for water resources development and conservation and other 
     purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
     substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to 
     the conditions, described in the respective reports 
     designated in this subsection:
       (1) Nome harbor improvements, alaska.--The project for 
     navigation, Nome Harbor improvements, Alaska: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated June 8, 1999, as amended by the 
     Chief of Engineers on August 2, 1999, at a total cost of 
     $25,651,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $20,192,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,459,000.
       (2) Sand point harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
     Sand Point Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
     dated October 13, 1998, at a total cost of $11,760,000, with 
     an estimated Federal cost of $6,964,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $4,796,000.
       (3) Seward harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
     Seward Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
     June 8, 1999, at a total cost of $12,240,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $4,089,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $8,151,000.
       (4) Rio salado (salt river), phoenix and tempe, arizona.--
     The project for flood control and environmental restoration, 
     Rio Salado (Salt River), Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona: Report 
     of the Chief of Engineers dated August 20, 1998, at a total 
     cost of $88,048,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $56,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $31,693,000.
       (5) Tucson drainage area, arizona.--The project for flood 
     damage reduction, environmental restoration, and recreation, 
     Tucson drainage area, Arizona: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated May 20, 1998, at a total cost of $29,900,000, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $16,768,000 and an 
     estimated non-Federal cost of $13,132,000.
       (6) American and sacramento rivers, california.--
       (A) In general.--The Folsom Dam Modification portion of the 
     Folsom Modification Plan described in the United States Army 
     Corps of Engineers Supplemental Information Report for the 
     American River Watershed Project, California, dated March 
     1996, as modified by the report entitled ``Folsom Dam 
     Modification Report, New Outlets Plan,'' dated March 1998, 
     prepared by the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, at an 
     estimated cost of $150,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
     cost of $97,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $52,500,000. The Secretary shall coordinate with the 
     Secretary of the Interior with respect to the design and 
     construction of modifications at Folsom Dam authorized by 
     this paragraph.
       (B) Reoperation measures.--Upon completion of the 
     improvements to Folsom Dam authorized by subparagraph (A), 
     the variable space allocated to flood control within the 
     Reservoir shall be reduced from the current operating range 
     of 400,000-670,000 acre-feet to 400,000-600,000 acre-feet.
       (C) Makeup of water shortages caused by flood control 
     operation.--The Secretary of the Interior shall enter into, 
     or modify, such agreements with the Sacramento Area Flood 
     Control Agency regarding the operation of Folsom Dam and 
     reservoir as may be necessary in order that, notwithstanding 
     any prior agreement or provision of law, 100 percent of the 
     water needed to make up for any water shortage caused by 
     variable flood control operation during any year at Folsom 
     Dam and resulting in a significant impact on recreation at 
     Folsom Reservoir shall be replaced, to the extent the water 
     is available for purchase, by the Secretary of the Interior.
       (D) Significant impact on recreation.--For the purposes of 
     this paragraph, a significant impact on recreation is defined 
     as any impact that results in a lake elevation at Folsom 
     Reservoir below 435 feet above sea level starting on May 15 
     and ending on September 15 of any given year.
       (E) Updated flood management plan.--The Secretary, in 
     cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall update 
     the flood management plan for Folsom Dam authorized by 
     section 9159(f)(2) of the Department of Defense 
     Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 1946), to reflect the 
     operational capabilities created by the modification 
     authorized by subparagraph (A) and improved weather forecasts 
     based on the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction System of the 
     National Weather Service.
       (7) Oakland harbor, california.--The project for 
     navigation, Oakland Harbor, California: Report of the Chief 
     of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of 
     $252,290,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $128,081,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $124,209,000.
       (8) South sacramento county streams, california.--The 
     project for flood control, environmental restoration and 
     recreation, South Sacramento County streams, California: 
     Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a 
     total cost of $65,500,000, with an estimated

[[Page 20059]]

     Federal cost of $41,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $24,300,000.
       (9) Upper guadalupe river, california.--Construction of the 
     locally preferred plan for flood damage reduction and 
     recreation, Upper Guadalupe River, California, described as 
     the Bypass Channel Plan of the Chief of Engineers dated 
     August 19, 1998, at a total cost of $140,328,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $44,000,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $96,328,000.
       (10) Yuba river basin, california.--The project for flood 
     damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, California: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated November 25, 1998, at a total cost 
     of $26,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,350,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,250,000.
       (11) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-
     broadkill beach, delaware.--The project for hurricane and 
     storm damage reduction, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and 
     New Jersey-Broadkill Beach, Delaware: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated August 17, 1998, at a total cost of 
     $9,049,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,674,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,375,000, and at an 
     estimated average annual cost of $538,200 for periodic 
     nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
     estimated annual Federal cost of $349,800 and an estimated 
     annual non-Federal cost of $188,400.
       (12) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-port 
     mahon, delaware.--The project for ecosystem restoration, 
     Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Port Mahon, 
     Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 
     28, 1998, at a total cost of $7,644,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $4,969,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $2,675,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of 
     $234,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of 
     the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
     $152,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $82,000.
       (13) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-
     roosevelt inlet-lewes beach, delaware.--The project for 
     navigation mitigation and hurricane and storm damage 
     reduction, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-
     Roosevelt Inlet-Lewes Beach, Delaware: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated February 3, 1999, at a total cost of 
     $3,393,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,620,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $773,000, and at an 
     estimated average annual cost of $196,000 for periodic 
     nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
     estimated annual Federal cost of $152,000 and an estimated 
     annual non-Federal cost of $44,000.
       (14) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-villas 
     and vicinity, new jersey.--The project for shore protection 
     and ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware 
     and New Jersey-Villas and vicinity, New Jersey: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of 
     $7,520,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,888,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,632,000.
       (15) Delaware coast from cape henelopen to fenwick island, 
     bethany beach/south bethany beach, delaware.--The project for 
     hurricane and storm damage reduction, Delaware Coast from 
     Cape Henelopen to Fenwick Island, Bethany Beach/South Bethany 
     Beach, Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 
     21, 1999, at a total cost of $22,205,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $14,433,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $7,772,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of 
     $1,584,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of 
     the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
     $1,030,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
     $554,000.
       (16) Hillsboro and okeechobee aquifer, florida.--The 
     project for aquifer storage and recovery described in the 
     Corps of Engineers Central and Southern Florida Water Supply 
     Study, Florida, dated April 1989, and in House Document 369, 
     dated July 30, 1968, at a total cost of $27,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $13,500,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $13,500,000.
       (17) Jacksonville harbor, florida.--The project for 
     navigation, Jacksonville Harbor, Florida: Report of the Chief 
     of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of 
     $26,116,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,129,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $16,987,000.
       (18) Tampa harbor-big bend channel, florida.--The project 
     for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida: 
     Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 13, 1998, at a 
     total cost of $12,356,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $6,235,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,121,000.
       (19) Brunswick harbor, georgia.--The project for 
     navigation, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of 
     $50,717,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $32,966,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,751,000.
       (20) Beargrass creek, kentucky.--The project for flood 
     control, Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated May 12, 1998, at a total cost of $11,171,300, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $7,261,500 and an estimated 
     non-Federal cost of $3,909,800.
       (21) Amite river and tributaries, louisiana, east baton 
     rouge parish watershed.--The project for flood damage 
     reduction and recreation, Amite River and Tributaries, 
     Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated December 23, 1996, at a total cost 
     of $112,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $73,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $39,500,000.
       (22) Baltimore harbor anchorages and channels, maryland and 
     virginia.--
       (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Baltimore 
     Harbor Anchorages and Channels, Maryland and Virginia, Report 
     of the Chief of Engineers dated June 8, 1998, at a total cost 
     of $28,426,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $18,994,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,432,000.
       (B) Credit or reimbursement.--If a project cooperation 
     agreement is entered into, the non-Federal interest shall 
     receive credit toward, or reimbursement of, the Federal share 
     of project costs for construction work performed by the non-
     Federal interest before execution of the project cooperation 
     agreement if the Secretary finds the work to be integral to 
     the project.
       (C) Study of modifications.--During the preconstruction 
     engineering and design phase of the project, the Secretary 
     shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
     undertaking further modifications to the Dundalk Marine 
     Terminal access channels, consisting of--
       (i) deepening and widening the Dundalk access channels to a 
     depth of 50 feet and a width of 500 feet;
       (ii) widening the flares of the access channels; and
       (iii) providing a new flare on the west side of the 
     entrance to the east access channel.
       (D) Report.--
       (i) In general.--Not later than March 1, 2000, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the study 
     under subparagraph (C).
       (ii) Contents.--The report shall include a determination 
     of--

       (I) the feasibility of performing the project modifications 
     described in subparagraph (C); and
       (II) the appropriateness of crediting or reimbursing the 
     Federal share of the cost of the work performed by the non-
     Federal interest on the project modifications.

       (23) Red lake river at crookston, minnesota.--The project 
     for flood control, Red Lake River at Crookston, Minnesota: 
     Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 20, 1998, at a 
     total cost of $8,950,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $5,720,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,230,000.
       (24) Turkey creek basin, kansas city, missouri, and kansas 
     city, kansas.--The project for flood damage reduction, Turkey 
     Creek Basin, Kansas City, Missouri, and Kansas City, Kansas: 
     Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a 
     total cost of $42,875,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $25,596,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,279,000.
       (25) Lower cape may meadows, cape may point, new jersey.--
     The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem restoration, 
     shore protection, and hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
     Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey: Report of 
     the Chief of Engineers dated April 5, 1999, at a total cost 
     of $15,952,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,118,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,834,000, and at an 
     estimated average annual cost of $1,114,000 for periodic 
     nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
     estimated annual Federal cost of $897,000 and an estimated 
     annual non-Federal cost of $217,000.
       (26) Townsends inlet to cape may inlet, new jersey.--The 
     project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, shore 
     protection, and ecosystem restoration, Townsends Inlet to 
     Cape May Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
     dated September 28, 1998, at a total cost of $56,503,000, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $36,727,000 and an 
     estimated non-Federal cost of $19,776,000, and at an 
     estimated average annual cost of $2,000,000 for periodic 
     nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
     estimated annual Federal cost of $1,300,000 and an estimated 
     annual non-Federal cost of $700,000.
       (27) Guanajibo river, puerto rico.--
       (A) In general.--The project for flood control, Guanajibo 
     River, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
     February 27, 1996, at a total cost of $27,031,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $20,273,250 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $6,757,750.
       (B) Cost sharing.--Cost sharing for the project shall be 
     determined in accordance with section 103(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in 
     effect on October 11, 1996.
       (28) Rio grande de manati, barceloneta, puerto rico.--The 
     project for flood control, Rio Grande De Manati, Barceloneta, 
     Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 
     22, 1999, at a total cost of $13,491,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $8,785,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $4,706,000.
       (29) Rio nigua, salinas, puerto rico.--The project for 
     flood control, Rio Nigua, Salinas, Puerto Rico: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1997, at a total cost of 
     $13,702,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,645,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,057,000.
       (30) Salt creek, graham, texas.--The project for flood 
     control, environmental restoration, and recreation, Salt 
     Creek, Graham, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
     October 6, 1998, at a total cost of $10,080,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $6,560,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $3,520,000.
       (b) Projects Subject to a Final Report.--The following 
     projects for water resources development and conservation and 
     other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the 
     Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and 
     subject to the conditions, recommended in a

[[Page 20060]]

     final report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report 
     of the Chief is completed not later than December 31, 1999:
       (1) Heritage harbor, wrangell, alaska.--The project for 
     navigation, Heritage Harbor, Wrangell, Alaska, at a total 
     cost of $24,556,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $14,447,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of $10,109,000.
       (2) Arroyo pasajero, california.--The project for flood 
     damage reduction, Arroyo Pasajero, California, at a total 
     cost of $260,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $170,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $90,600,000.
       (3) Hamilton airfield, california.--The project for 
     environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, California, at 
     a total cost of $55,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
     of $41,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $13,800,000.
       (4) Success dam, tule river basin, california.--The project 
     for flood damage reduction and water supply, Success Dam, 
     Tule River basin, California, at a total cost of $17,900,000, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $11,635,000 and an 
     estimated non-Federal cost of $6,265,000.
       (5) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey: 
     oakwood beach, new jersey.--The project for shore protection, 
     Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey: Oakwood 
     Beach, New Jersey, at a total cost of $3,360,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $2,184,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $1,176,000, and at an estimated average 
     annual cost of $81,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-
     year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal 
     cost of $53,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
     $28,000.
       (6) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey: reeds 
     beach and pierces point, new jersey.--The project for shore 
     protection and ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay coastline, 
     Delaware and New Jersey: Reeds Beach and Pierces Point, New 
     Jersey, at a total cost of $4,057,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $2,637,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $1,420,000.
       (7) Little talbot island, duval county, florida.--The 
     project for hurricane and storm damage prevention and shore 
     protection, Little Talbot Island, Duval County, Florida, at a 
     total cost of $5,915,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $3,839,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,076,000.
       (8) Ponce de leon inlet, florida.--The project for 
     navigation and related purposes, Ponce de Leon Inlet, Volusia 
     County, Florida, at a total cost of $5,454,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $2,988,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $2,466,000.
       (9) Savannah harbor expansion, georgia.--
       (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the project 
     for navigation, Savannah Harbor expansion, Georgia, including 
     implementation of the mitigation plan, with such 
     modifications as the Secretary considers appropriate, at a 
     total cost of $230,174,000 (of which amount a portion is 
     authorized for implementation of the mitigation plan), with 
     an estimated Federal cost of $145,160,000 and an estimated 
     non-Federal cost of $85,014,000.
       (B) Conditions.--The project authorized by subparagraph (A) 
     may be carried out only after--
       (i) the Secretary, in consultation with affected Federal, 
     State of Georgia, State of South Carolina, regional, and 
     local entities, reviews and approves an environmental impact 
     statement for the project that includes--

       (I) an analysis of the impacts of project depth 
     alternatives ranging from 42 feet through 48 feet; and
       (II) a selected plan for navigation and an associated 
     mitigation plan as required under section 906(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(a)); and

       (ii) the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of 
     Commerce, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
     Agency, and the Secretary approve the selected plan and 
     determine that the associated mitigation plan adequately 
     addresses the potential environmental impacts of the project.
       (C) Mitigation requirements.--The mitigation plan shall be 
     implemented before or concurrently with construction of the 
     project.
       (10) Des plaines river, illinois.--The project for flood 
     control, Des Plaines River, Illinois, at a total cost of 
     $48,800,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $31,700,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,100,000.
       (11) Reelfoot lake, kentucky and tennessee.--The project 
     for ecosystem restoration, Reelfoot Lake, Kentucky and 
     Tennessee, at a total cost of $35,287,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $23,601,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $11,686,000.
       (12) Brigantine inlet to great egg harbor, brigantine 
     island, new jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm 
     damage reduction and shore protection, Brigantine Inlet to 
     Great Egg Harbor, Brigantine Island, New Jersey, at a total 
     cost of $4,970,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $3,230,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,740,000, 
     and at an estimated average annual cost of $465,000 for 
     periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, 
     with an estimated annual Federal cost of $302,000 and an 
     estimated annual non-Federal cost of $163,000.
       (13) Columbia river channel, oregon and washington.--The 
     project for navigation, Columbia River Channel, Oregon and 
     Washington, at a total cost of $183,623,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $106,132,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $77,491,000.
       (14) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--The project for 
     flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, and 
     recreation, Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas, at a total cost 
     of $20,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,000,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,300,000.
       (15) Howard hanson dam, washington.--The project for water 
     supply and ecosystem restoration, Howard Hanson Dam, 
     Washington, at a total cost of $75,600,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $36,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $38,700,000.

     SEC. 102. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
     each of the following projects and, if the Secretary 
     determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the 
     project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
     (33 U.S.C. 701s).
       (1) Eyak river, cordova, alaska.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Eyak River, Cordova, Alaska.
       (2) Salcha river and piledriver slough, fairbanks, 
     alaska.--Project for flood damage reduction to protect 
     against surface water flooding, lower Salcha River and 
     Piledriver Slough from its headwaters at the mouth of the 
     Salcha River to the Chena Lakes Flood Control Project, 
     Fairbanks, Alaska.
       (3) Lancaster, california.--Project for flood control, 
     Lancaster, California, westside stormwater retention 
     facility.
       (4) Magpie creek, california.--Project for flood control, 
     Magpie Creek, California, located within the boundaries of 
     McClellan Air Force Base.
       (5) Gateway triangle area, florida.--Project for flood 
     control, Gateway Triangle area, Collier County, Florida.
       (6) Plant city, florida.--Project for flood control, Plant 
     City, Florida.
       (7) Stone island, lake monroe, florida.--Project for flood 
     control, Stone Island, Lake Monroe, Florida.
       (8) Ohio river, illinois.--Project for flood control, Ohio 
     River, Illinois.
       (9) Hamilton dam, michigan.--Project for flood control, 
     Hamilton Dam, Michigan.
       (10) Repaupo creek and delaware river, gloucester county, 
     new jersey.--Project for tidegate and levee improvements for 
     Repaupo Creek and the Delaware River, Gloucester County, New 
     Jersey.
       (11) Irondequoit creek, new york.--Project for flood 
     control, Irondequoit Creek watershed, New York.
       (12) Owasco lake seawall, new york.--Project for flood 
     control, Owasco Lake seawall, New York.
       (13) Port clinton, ohio.--Project for flood control, Port 
     Clinton, Ohio.
       (14) Abington township, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
     control, Baeder and Wanamaker Roads, Abington Township, 
     Pennsylvania.
       (15) Port indian, west norriton township, montgomery 
     county, pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Port 
     Indian, West Norriton Township, Montgomery County, 
     Pennsylvania.
       (16) Port providence, upper providence township, 
     pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Port Providence, 
     Upper Providence Township, Pennsylvania.
       (17) Springfield township, montgomery county, 
     pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Springfield 
     Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
       (18) Tawney run creek, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
     control, Tawney Run Creek, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
       (19) Wissahickon watershed, pennsylvania.--Project for 
     flood control, Wissahickon watershed, Philadelphia, 
     Pennsylvania.
       (20) Tioga county, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
     control, Tioga River and Cowanesque River and their 
     tributaries, Tioga County, Pennsylvania.
       (21) First creek, knoxville, tennessee.--Project for flood 
     control, First Creek, Knoxville, Tennessee.
       (22) Metro center levee, cumberland river, nashville, 
     tennessee.--Project for flood control, Metro Center Levee, 
     Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
       (b) Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.--
       (1) Maximum federal expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be expended for the project for flood 
     control, Festus and Crystal City, Missouri, is $10,000,000.
       (2) Revision of project cooperation agreement.--The 
     Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
     the project described in paragraph (1) to take into account 
     the change in the Federal participation in the project under 
     paragraph (1).

     SEC. 103. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
     each of the following projects and, if the Secretary 
     determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the 
     project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 
     U.S.C. 701r):
       (1) Arctic ocean, barrow, alaska.--Project for storm damage 
     reduction and coastal erosion, Barrow, Alaska.
       (2) Saint joseph river, indiana.--Project for streambank 
     erosion control, Saint Joseph River, Indiana.
       (3) Saginaw river, bay city, michigan.--Project for 
     streambank erosion control, Saginaw River, Bay City, 
     Michigan.
       (4) Big timber creek, new jersey.--Project for streambank 
     erosion control, Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
       (5) Lake shore road, athol springs, new york.--Project for 
     streambank erosion control, Lake Shore Road, Athol Springs, 
     New York.

[[Page 20061]]

       (6) Marist college, poughkeepsie, new york.--Project for 
     streambank erosion control, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New 
     York.
       (7) Monroe county, ohio.--Project for streambank erosion 
     control, Monroe County, Ohio.
       (8) Green valley, west virginia.--Project for streambank 
     erosion control, Green Valley, West Virginia.
       (b) Yellowstone River, Billings, Montana.--The streambank 
     protection project at Coulson Park, along the Yellowstone 
     River, Billings, Montana, shall be eligible for assistance 
     under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
     701r).

     SEC. 104. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
     following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
     project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
     107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577).
       (1) Grand marais, arkansas.--Project for navigation, Grand 
     Marais, Arkansas.
       (2) Fields landing channel, humboldt harbor, california.--
     Project for navigation, Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt 
     Harbor, California.
       (3) San mateo (pillar point harbor), california.--Project 
     for navigation, San Mateo (Pillar Point Harbor), California.
       (4) Agana marina, guam.--Project for navigation, Agana 
     Marina, Guam.
       (5) Agat marina, guam.--Project for navigation, Agat 
     Marina, Guam.
       (6) Apra harbor fuel piers, guam.--Project for navigation, 
     Apra Harbor Fuel Piers, Guam.
       (7) Apra harbor pier f-6, guam.--Project for navigation, 
     Apra Harbor Pier F-6, Guam.
       (8) Apra harbor seawall, guam.--Project for navigation 
     including a seawall, Apra Harbor, Guam.
       (9) Guam harbor, guam.--Project for navigation, Guam 
     Harbor, Guam.
       (10) Illinois river near chautauqua park, illinois.--
     Project for navigation, Illinois River near Chautauqua Park, 
     Illinois.
       (11) Whiting shoreline waterfront, whiting, indiana.--
     Project for navigation, Whiting shoreline waterfront, 
     Whiting, Indiana.
       (12) Union river, ellsworth, maine.--Project for 
     navigation, Union River, Ellsworth, Maine.
       (13) Naraguagus river, machias, maine.--Project for 
     navigation, Naraguagus River, Machias, Maine.
       (14) Detroit river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
     Detroit River, Michigan, including dredging and removal of a 
     reef.
       (15) Fortescue inlet, delaware bay, new jersey.--Project 
     for navigation, Fortescue Inlet, Delaware Bay, New Jersey.
       (16) Braddock bay, greece, new york.--Project for 
     navigation, Braddock Bay, Greece, New York.
       (17) Buffalo and lasalle park, new york.--Project for 
     navigation, Buffalo and LaSalle Park, New York.
       (18) Sturgeon point, new york.--Project for navigation, 
     Sturgeon Point, New York.
       (19) Fairport harbor, ohio.--Project for navigation, 
     Fairport Harbor, Ohio, including a recreation channel.

     SEC. 105. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 
                   THE ENVIRONMENT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
     each of the following projects and, if the Secretary 
     determines that a project is appropriate, may carry out the 
     project under section 1135(a) of the Water Reseources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a):
       (1) Illinois river in the vicinity of havana, illinois.--
     Project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
     Illinois River in the vicinity of Havana, Illinois.
       (2) Knitting mill creek, virginia.--Project for improvement 
     of the quality of the environment, Knitting Mill Creek, 
     Virginia.
       (b) Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California.--Under 
     authority of section 1135(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a)), the Secretary 
     shall carry out a project to construct a turbine bypass at 
     Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California, in accordance with 
     the project modification report and environmental assessment 
     dated September 1996.

     SEC. 106. SMALL AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECTS.

       The Secretary is authorized to carry out the following 
     projects under section 206 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
       (1) Contra costa county, bay delta, california.--Project 
     for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Contra Costa County, Bay 
     Delta, California.
       (2) Indian river, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration and lagoon restoration, Indian River, Florida.
       (3) Little wekiva river, florida.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration and erosion control, Little Wekiva 
     River, Florida.
       (4) Cook county, illinois.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration and lagoon restoration and protection, Cook 
     County, Illinois.
       (5) Grand batture island, mississippi.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Grand Batture Island, Mississippi.
       (6) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and reef 
     restoration along the Gulf Coast, Hancock, Harrison, and 
     Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
       (7) Mississippi river and river des peres, st. louis, 
     missouri.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
     recreation, Mississippi River and River Des Peres, St. Louis, 
     Missouri.
       (8) Hudson river, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Hudson River, New York.
       (9) Oneida lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Oneida Lake, Oneida County, New York.
       (10) Otsego lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Otsego Lake, Otsego County, New York.
       (11) North fork of yellow creek, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, North Fork of Yellow Creek, Ohio.
       (12) Wheeling creek watershed, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Wheeling Creek watershed, Ohio.
       (13) Springfield millrace, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Springfield Millrace, Oregon.
       (14) Upper amazon creek, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Upper Amazon Creek, Oregon.
       (15) Lake ontelaunee reservoir, berks county, 
     pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
     distilling pond facilities, Lake Ontelaunee Reservoir, Berks 
     County, Pennsylvania.
       (16) Blackstone river basin, rhode island and 
     massachusetts.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
     fish passage facilities, Blackstone River Basin, Rhode Island 
     and Massachusetts.
                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

     SEC. 201. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL AUTHORITY.

       Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
     701s) is amended--
       (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``construction of 
     small projects'' and inserting ``implementation of small 
     structural and nonstructural projects''; and
       (2) in the third sentence, by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$7,000,000''.

     SEC. 202. USE OF NON-FEDERAL FUNDS FOR COMPILING AND 
                   DISSEMINATING INFORMATION ON FLOODS AND FLOOD 
                   DAMAGE.

       Section 206(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
     709a(b)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting before 
     the period at the end the following: ``, but the Secretary of 
     the Army may accept funds voluntarily contributed by such 
     entities for the purpose of expanding the scope of the 
     services requested by the entities''.

     SEC. 203. CONTRIBUTIONS BY STATES AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS.

       Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), is 
     amended by inserting ``or environmental restoration'' after 
     ``flood control''.

     SEC. 204. SEDIMENT DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.

       Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (33 U.S.C. 2239 note; Public Law 102-580) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
       ``(4) Practical end-use products.--Technologies selected 
     for demonstration at the pilot scale shall be intended to 
     result in practical end-use products.
       ``(5) Assistance by the secretary.--The Secretary shall 
     assist the project to ensure expeditious completion by 
     providing sufficient quantities of contaminated dredged 
     material to conduct the full-scale demonstrations to stated 
     capacity.'';
       (2) in subsection (c), by striking the first sentence and 
     inserting the following: ``There is authorized to be 
     appropriated to carry out this section $22,000,000 to 
     complete technology testing, technology commercialization, 
     and the development of full scale processing facilities 
     within the New York/New Jersey Harbor.''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(e) Support.--In carrying out the program under this 
     section, the Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, 
     cooperative agreements, and grants with colleges and 
     universities and other non-Federal entities.''.

     SEC. 205. CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANTS.

       Section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 
     610) is amended--
       (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by striking 
     ``water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, 
     melaleuca, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from'' 
     and inserting ``noxious aquatic plant growths from'';
       (2) in the first sentence of subsection (b), by striking 
     ``$12,000,000'' and inserting ``$15,000,000.''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(c) Support.--In carrying out the program under this 
     section, the Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, 
     cooperative agreements, and grants with colleges and 
     universities and other non-Federal entities.''.

     SEC. 206. USE OF CONTINUING CONTRACTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 
                   CERTAIN PROJECTS.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     law, the Secretary shall not implement a fully allocated 
     funding policy with respect to a water resource project if 
     initiation of construction has occurred but sufficient funds 
     are not available to complete the project.
       (b) Continuing Contracts.--The Secretary shall enter into a 
     continuing contract for a project described in subsection 
     (a).
       (c) Initiation of Construction Clarified.--For the purposes 
     of this section, initiation of construction for a project 
     occurs on the date of enactment of an Act that appropriates 
     funds for the project from 1 of the following appropriation 
     accounts:
       (1) Construction, General.
       (2) Operation and Maintenance, General.
       (3) Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries.

[[Page 20062]]



     SEC. 207. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR THE PACIFIC 
                   REGION.

       Section 444 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3747) is amended by striking ``interest of 
     navigation'' and inserting ``interests of water resources 
     development including navigation, flood damage reduction, and 
     environmental restoration''.

     SEC. 208. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

       (a) Extension of Program.--Section 528(b)(3) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 is amended--
       (1) in subparagraph (B) (110 Stat. 3769), by striking 
     ``1999'' and inserting ``2003''; and
       (2) in subparagraph (C)(i) (110 Stat. 3769), by striking 
     ``1999'' and inserting ``2003''.
       (b) Credit and Reimbursement of Past and Future 
     Activities.--Section 528(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3768) is amended by adding 
     at the end the following:
       ``(D) Credit and reimbursement of past and future 
     activities.--The Secretary may provide credit to or reimburse 
     the non-Federal project sponsor (using funds authorized by 
     subparagraph (C)) for the reasonable costs of any work that 
     has been performed or will be performed in connection with a 
     study or activity meeting the requirements of subparagraph 
     (A) if--
       ``(i) the Secretary determines that--

       ``(I) the work performed by the non-Federal project sponsor 
     will substantially expedite completion of a critical 
     restoration project; and
       ``(II) the work is necessary for a critical restoration 
     project; and

       ``(ii) the credit or reimbursement is granted pursuant to a 
     project-specific agreement that prescribes the terms and 
     conditions of the credit or reimbursement.''.
       (c) Caloosahatchee River Basin, Florida.--Section 528(e)(4) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
     3770) is amended in the first sentence by inserting before 
     the period at the end the following: ``if the Secretary 
     determines that the acquisition is compatible with and an 
     integral component of the Everglades and South Florida 
     ecosystem restoration, including potential acquisition of 
     land or interests in land in the Caloosahatchee River basin 
     or other areas''.
       (d) In-Kind Work.--Section 528(e)(4) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3770) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``Regardless'' and inserting the following:
       ``(1) Land acquisition.--Regardless''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) In-kind work.--
       ``(A) In general.--During the preconstruction, engineering, 
     and design phase and the construction phase of the Central 
     and Southern Florida Project, the Secretary shall allow 
     credit against the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     activities described in subsection (b) for work performed by 
     non-Federal interests at the request of the Secretary in 
     furtherance of the design of features included in the 
     comprehensive plan under that subsection.
       ``(B) Audits.--In-kind work to be credited under 
     subparagraph (A) shall be subject to audit.''.

     SEC. 209. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

       Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``cooperative agreement 
     in accordance with the requirements of section 221 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1970'' and inserting ``binding agreement 
     with the Secretary''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any 
     project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of 
     the affected local government.''.

     SEC. 210. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

       Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2330) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)--
       (A) by striking ``Non-Federal'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) In general.--Non-Federal''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Form.--Before October 1, 2003, the Federal share of 
     the cost of a project under this section may be provided in 
     the form of reimbursements of project costs.''; and
       (2) in subsection (c)--
       (A) by striking ``Construction'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) In general.--Construction''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Nonprofit entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any 
     project carried out under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of 
     the affected local government.''.

     SEC. 211. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

       Section 503 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3756) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (d)--
       (A) by striking paragraph (10) and inserting the following:
       ``(10) Regional Atlanta watershed, Atlanta, Georgia, and 
     Lake Lanier, Forsyth and Hall Counties, Georgia.''; and
       (B) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(14) Clear Lake watershed, California.
       ``(15) Fresno Slough watershed, California.
       ``(16) Hayward Marsh, Southern San Francisco Bay watershed, 
     California.
       ``(17) Kaweah River watershed, California.
       ``(18) Lake Tahoe watershed, California and Nevada.
       ``(19) Malibu Creek watershed, California.
       ``(20) Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida.
       ``(21) Illinois River watershed, Illinois.
       ``(22) Truckee River basin, Nevada.
       ``(23) Walker River basin, Nevada.
       ``(24) Bronx River watershed, New York.
       ``(25) Catawba River watershed, North Carolina.
       ``(26) Columbia Slough watershed, Oregon.
       ``(27) Cabin Creek basin, West Virginia.'';
       (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
       (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
       ``(e) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) 
     of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project undertaken under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of 
     the affected local government.''.

     SEC. 212. FLOOD MITIGATION AND RIVERINE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may undertake a program for 
     the purpose of conducting projects to reduce flood hazards 
     and restore the natural functions and values of rivers 
     throughout the United States.
       (b) Studies and Projects.--
       (1) Authority.--In carrying out the program, the Secretary 
     may conduct studies to identify appropriate flood damage 
     reduction, conservation, and restoration measures and may 
     design and implement projects described in subsection (a).
       (2) Consultation and coordination.--The studies and 
     projects carried out under this section shall be conducted, 
     to the maximum extent practicable, in consultation and 
     coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and 
     other appropriate Federal agencies, and in consultation and 
     coordination with appropriate State and local agencies and 
     tribes.
       (3) Nonstructural approaches.--The studies and projects 
     shall emphasize, to the maximum extent practicable and 
     appropriate, nonstructural approaches to preventing or 
     reducing flood damages.
       (4) Participation.--The studies and projects shall be 
     conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, in cooperation 
     with State and local agencies and tribes to ensure the 
     coordination of local flood damage reduction or riverine and 
     wetland restoration studies with projects that conserve, 
     restore, and manage hydrologic and hydraulic regimes and 
     restore the natural functions and values of floodplains.
       (c) Cost-Sharing Requirements.--
       (1) Studies.--Studies conducted under this section shall be 
     subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 105 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).
       (2) Environmental restoration and nonstructural flood 
     control projects.--
       (A) In general.--The non-Federal interests shall pay 35 
     percent of the cost of any environmental restoration or 
     nonstructural flood control project carried out under this 
     section.
       (B) Items provided by non-federal interests.--The non-
     Federal interests shall provide all land, easements, rights-
     of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and relocations 
     necessary for such projects.
       (C) Credit.--The value of such land, easements, rights-of-
     way, dredged material disposal areas, and relocations shall 
     be credited toward the payment required under this paragraph.
       (3) Structural flood control projects.--Any structural 
     flood control projects carried out under this section shall 
     be subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 103(a) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
     2213(a)).
       (4) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal interests 
     shall be responsible for all costs associated with operating, 
     maintaining, replacing, repairing, and rehabilitating all 
     projects carried out under this section.
       (d) Project Justification.--
       (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
     or requirement for economic justification established under 
     section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-
     2), the Secretary may implement a project under this section 
     if the Secretary determines that the project--
       (A) will significantly reduce potential flood damages;
       (B) will improve the quality of the environment; and
       (C) is justified considering all costs and beneficial 
     outputs of the project.
       (2) Establishment of selection and rating criteria and 
     policies.--
       (A) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation with 
     State and local agencies and tribes, shall--
       (i) develop, and submit to the Committee on Transportation 
     and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, 
     criteria for selecting and rating projects to be carried out 
     under this section; and
       (ii) establish policies and procedures for carrying out the 
     studies and projects undertaken under this section.
       (B) Criteria.--The criteria referred to in subparagraph 
     (A)(i) shall include, as a priority, the extent to which the 
     appropriate State government supports the project.
       (e) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the 
     Secretary shall examine appropriate locations, including--

[[Page 20063]]

       (1) Pima County, Arizona, at Paseo De Las Iglesias and 
     Rillito River;
       (2) Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California;
       (3) Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, California;
       (4) Murrieta Creek, California;
       (5) Napa River Valley watershed, California, at Yountville, 
     St Helena, Calistoga, and American Canyon;
       (6) Santa Clara basin, California, at Upper Guadalupe River 
     and Tributaries, San Francisquito Creek, and Upper Penitencia 
     Creek;
       (7) Pond Creek, Kentucky;
       (8) Red River of the North, Minnesota, North Dakota, and 
     South Dakota;
       (9) Connecticut River, New Hampshire;
       (10) Pine Mount Creek, New Jersey;
       (11) Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico;
       (12) Upper Delaware River, New York;
       (13) Briar Creek, North Carolina;
       (14) Chagrin River, Ohio;
       (15) Mill Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio;
       (16) Tillamook County, Oregon,
       (17) Willamette River basin, Oregon;
       (18) Blair County, Pennsylvania, at Altoona and Frankstown 
     Township;
       (19) Delaware River, Pennsylvania;
       (20) Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania;
       (21) Providence County, Rhode Island;
       (22) Shenandoah River, Virginia; and
       (23) Lincoln Creek, Wisconsin.
       (f) Program Review.--
       (1) In general.--The program established under this section 
     shall be subject to an independent review to evaluate the 
     efficacy of the program in achieving the dual goals of flood 
     hazard mitigation and riverine restoration.
       (2) Report.--Not later than April 15, 2003, the Secretary 
     shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
     report on the findings of the review conducted under this 
     subsection with any recommendations concerning continuation 
     of the program.
       (g) Maximum Federal Cost per Project.--Not more than 
     $30,000,000 may be expended by the United States on any 
     single project under this section.
       (h) Procedure.--
       (1) All projects.--The Secretary shall not implement any 
     project under this section until--
       (A) the Secretary submits to the Committee on Environment 
     and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives a written notification describing the project 
     and the determinations made under subsection (d)(1); and
       (B) 21 calendar days have elapsed after the date on which 
     the notification was received by the committees.
       (2) Projects exceeding $15,000,000.--
       (A) Limitation on appropriations.--No appropriation shall 
     be made to construct any project under this section the total 
     Federal cost of construction of which exceeds $15,000,000 if 
     the project has not been approved by resolutions adopted by 
     the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works of the Senate.
       (B) Report.--For the purpose of securing consideration of 
     approval under this paragraph, the Secretary shall submit a 
     report on the proposed project, including all relevant data 
     and information on all costs.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--
       (1) In general.--There are authorized to be appropriated to 
     carry out this section--
       (A) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2001;
       (B) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2002; and
       (C) $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2003 through 2005.
       (2)  Full funding.--All studies and projects carried out 
     under this section from Army Civil Works appropriations shall 
     be fully funded within the program funding levels provided in 
     this subsection.

     SEC. 213. SHORE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

       (a) Review.--The Secretary shall review the implementation 
     of the Corps of Engineers shore management program, with 
     particular attention to--
       (1) inconsistencies in implementation among the divisions 
     and districts of the Corps of Engineers; and
       (2) complaints by or potential inequities regarding 
     property owners in the Savannah District, including an 
     accounting of the number and disposition of complaints in the 
     Savannah District during the 5-year period preceding the date 
     of enactment of this Act.
       (b) Report.--As expeditiously as practicable, but not later 
     than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
     Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
     report describing the results of the review under subsection 
     (a).

     SEC. 214. SHORE DAMAGE PREVENTION OR MITIGATION.

       Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 
     426i) is amended--
       (1) in the first sentence--
       (A) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``(a) In 
     General.--The Secretary''; and
       (B) by inserting after ``navigation works'' the following: 
     ``and shore damage attributable to the Atlantic Intracoastal 
     Waterway and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway'';
       (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``The costs'' and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The costs'';
       (3) in the third sentence--
       (A) by striking ``No such'' and inserting the following:
       ``(c) Requirement for Specific Authorization.--No such''; 
     and
       (B) by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$5,000,000''; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(d) Coordination.--The Secretary shall--
       ``(1) coordinate the implementation of the measures under 
     this section with other Federal and non-Federal shore 
     protection projects in the same geographic area; and
       ``(2) to the extent practicable, combine mitigation 
     projects with other shore protection projects in the same 
     area into a comprehensive regional project.''.

     SEC. 215. SHORE PROTECTION.

       (a) Periodic Nourishment.--Section 103(d) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(d)) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``Costs of constructing'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) Construction.--Costs of constructing''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Periodic nourishment.--
       ``(A) In general.--In the case of a project authorized for 
     construction after December 31, 1999, or for which a 
     feasibility study is completed after that date, the non-
     Federal cost of the periodic nourishment of the project, or 
     any measure for shore protection or beach erosion control for 
     the project, that is carried out--
       ``(i) after January 1, 2001, shall be 40 percent;
       ``(ii) after January 1, 2002, shall be 45 percent; and
       ``(iii) after January 1, 2003, shall be 50 percent.
       ``(B) Benefits to privately owned shores.--All costs 
     assigned to benefits of periodic nourishment projects or 
     measures to privately owned shores (where use of such shores 
     is limited to private interests) or to prevention of losses 
     of private land shall be borne by the non-Federal interest.
       ``(C) Benefits to federally owned shores.--All costs 
     assigned to the protection of federally owned shores for 
     periodic nourishment measures shall be borne by the United 
     States.''.
       (b) Outer Continental Shelf.--
       (1) Use of sand from outer continental shelf.--Section 
     8(k)(2)(B) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 
     U.S.C. 1337(k)(2)(B)) is amended in the second sentence by 
     striking ``an agency of the Federal Government'' and 
     inserting ``a Federal, State, or local government agency''.
       (2) Reimbursement of local interests.--Any amounts paid by 
     non-Federal interests for beach erosion control, hurricane 
     protection, shore protection, or storm damage reduction 
     projects as a result of an assessment under section 8(k) of 
     the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)) 
     shall be fully reimbursed.
       (c) Report on Shores of the United States.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall report to Congress 
     on the state of the shores of the United States.
       (2) Contents.--The report shall include--
       (A) a description of--
       (i) the extent of, and economic and environmental effects 
     caused by, erosion and accretion along the shores of the 
     United States; and
       (ii) the causes of such erosion and accretion;
       (B) a description of resources committed by Federal, State, 
     and local governments to restore and renourish shores;
       (C) a description of the systematic movement of sand along 
     the shores of the United States; and
       (D) recommendations regarding--
       (i) appropriate levels of Federal and non-Federal 
     participation in shore protection; and
       (ii) use of a systems approach to sand management.
       (3) Use of specific location data.--In developing the 
     report, the Secretary shall use data from specific locations 
     on the coasts of the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, Great 
     Lakes, and Gulf of Mexico.
       (d) National Coastal Data Bank.--
       (1) Establishment of data bank.--Not later than 2 years 
     after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
     establish a national coastal data bank containing data on the 
     geophysical and climatological characteristics of the shores 
     of the United States.
       (2) Content.--To the extent practicable, the national 
     coastal data bank shall include data regarding current and 
     predicted shore positions, information on federally 
     authorized shore protection projects, and data on the 
     movement of sand along the shores of the United States, 
     including impediments to such movement caused by natural and 
     manmade features.
       (3) Access.--The national coastal data bank shall be made 
     readily accessible to the public.

     SEC. 216. FLOOD PREVENTION COORDINATION.

       Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
     709a) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
     (c) and (d), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
       ``(b) Flood Prevention Coordination.--The Secretary shall 
     coordinate with the Director of the Federal Emergency 
     Management Agency and the heads of other Federal agencies to 
     ensure that flood control projects and plans are 
     complementary and integrated to the extent practicable and 
     appropriate.''.

     SEC. 217. DISPOSAL OF DREDGED MATERIAL ON BEACHES.

       (a) In General.--Section 145 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j)

[[Page 20064]]

     is amended in the first sentence by striking ``50'' and 
     inserting ``35''.
       (b) Great Lakes Basin.--The Secretary shall work with the 
     State of Ohio, other Great Lakes States, and political 
     subdivisions of the States to fully implement and maximize 
     beneficial reuse of dredged material as provided under 
     section 145 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 
     (33 U.S.C. 426j).
       (c) Bolivar Peninsula, Jefferson, Chambers, and Galveston 
     Counties, Texas.--The Secretary may design and construct a 
     shore protection project between the south jetty of the 
     Sabine Pass Channel and the north jetty of the Galveston 
     Harbor Entrance Channel in Jefferson, Chambers, and Galveston 
     Counties, Texas, including beneficial use of dredged material 
     from Federal navigation projects as provided under section 
     145 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 
     426j).
       (d) Galveston Beach, Galveston County, Texas.--The 
     Secretary may design and construct a shore protection project 
     between the Galveston South Jetty and San Luis Pass, 
     Galveston County, Texas, using innovative nourishment 
     techniques, including beneficial use of dredged material from 
     Federal navigation projects as provided under section 145 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).
       (e) Rollover Pass, Galveston County, Texas.--The Secretary 
     may place dredged material from the Gulf Intracoastal 
     Waterway on the beaches along Rollover Pass, Galveston 
     County, Texas, to stabilize beach erosion as provided under 
     section 145 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 
     (33 U.S.C. 426j).

     SEC. 218. ANNUAL PASSES FOR RECREATION.

       Section 208(c)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (16 U.S.C. 460d-3 note; 110 Stat. 3681) is amended by 
     striking ``later of December 31, 1999, or the date of 
     transmittal of the report under paragraph (3)'' and inserting 
     ``December 31, 2003''.

     SEC. 219. NONSTRUCTURAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

       (a) Analysis of Benefits.--Section 308 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2318) is 
     amended--
       (1) in the heading of subsection (a), by inserting 
     ``Exclusion of Elements From'' before ``Benefit-Cost'';
       (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as 
     subsections (c) through (f), respectively;
       (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
       ``(b) Flood Damage Reduction Benefits.--
       ``(1) In general.--In calculating the benefits of a 
     proposed project for nonstructural flood damage reduction, 
     the Secretary shall calculate the benefits of the 
     nonstructural project using methods similar to those used for 
     calculating the benefits of structural projects, including 
     similar treatment in calculating the benefits from losses 
     avoided.
       ``(2) Avoidance of double counting.--In carrying out 
     paragraph (1), the Secretary should avoid double counting of 
     benefits.''; and
       (4) in subsection (d), by striking ``subsection (b)'' and 
     inserting ``subsection (c)''.
       (b) Reevaluation of Flood Control Projects.--At the request 
     of a non-Federal interest for a flood control project, the 
     Secretary shall conduct a reevaluation of a project 
     authorized before the date of enactment of this Act to 
     consider nonstructural alternatives in light of the 
     amendments made by subsection (a).
       (c) Cost Sharing.--Section 103(b) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(b)) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``The non-Federal'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) In general.--The non-Federal''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Non-federal contribution in excess of 35 percent.--At 
     any time during construction of a project, if the Secretary 
     determines that the costs of land, easements, rights-of-way, 
     dredged material disposal areas, and relocations for the 
     project, in combination with other costs contributed by the 
     non-Federal interests, will exceed 35 percent, any additional 
     costs for the project (not to exceed 65 percent of the total 
     costs of the project) shall be a Federal responsibility and 
     shall be contributed during construction as part of the 
     Federal share.''.

     SEC. 220. LAKES PROGRAM.

       Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (100 Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (14), by inserting ``and nutrient 
     monitoring'' after ``growth'';
       (2) in paragraph (15), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (3) in paragraph (16), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting a semicolon; and
       (4) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(17) Clear Lake, Lake County, California, removal of silt 
     and aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
     sedimentation and high nutrient concentration;
       ``(18) Flints Pond, Hollis, Hillsborough County, New 
     Hampshire, removal of silt and aquatic growth and measures to 
     address excessive sedimentation; and
       ``(19) Osgood Pond, Milford, Hillsborough County, New 
     Hampshire, removal of silt and aquatic growth and measures to 
     address excessive sedimentation.''.

     SEC. 221. ENHANCEMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES.

       Section 906(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(e)) is amended by inserting after the 
     second sentence the following: ``Not more than 80 percent of 
     the non-Federal share of such first costs may be satisfied 
     through in-kind contributions, including facilities, 
     supplies, and services that are necessary to carry out the 
     enhancement project.''.

     SEC. 222. PURCHASE OF AMERICAN-MADE EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS.

       (a) In General.--It is the sense of Congress that, to the 
     extent practicable, all equipment and products purchased with 
     funds made available under this Act should be American made.
       (b) Notice to Recipients of Assistance.--In providing 
     financial assistance under this Act, the Secretary, to the 
     greatest extent practicable, shall provide to each recipient 
     of the assistance a notice describing the statement made in 
     subsection (a).

     SEC. 223. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-
                   FEDERAL INTERESTS.

       (a) In General.--Section 211(d) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(d)) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Any non-Federal 
     interest that has received from the Secretary pursuant to 
     subsection (b) or (c)'' and inserting the following:
       ``(A) Studies and design activities under subsection (b).--
       ``(i) In general.--A non-Federal interest may carry out 
     construction for which studies and design documents are 
     prepared under subsection (b) only if the Secretary approves 
     the project for construction.
       ``(ii) Criteria for approval.--The Secretary shall approve 
     a project for construction if the Secretary determines that 
     the project is technically sound, economically justified, and 
     environmentally acceptable and meets the requirements for 
     obtaining the appropriate permits required under the 
     authority of the Secretary.
       ``(iii) No unreasonable withholding of approval.--The 
     Secretary shall not unreasonably withhold approval of a 
     project for construction.
       ``(iv) No effect on regulatory authority.--Nothing in this 
     subparagraph affects any regulatory authority of the 
     Secretary.
       ``(B) Studies and design activities under subsection (c).--
     Any non-Federal interest that has received from the Secretary 
     under subsection (c)''; and
       (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (2), by inserting 
     ``(other than paragraph (1)(A))'' after ``this subsection''.
       (b) Reimbursement.--
       (1) In general.--Section 211(e)(1) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)(1)) is 
     amended--
       (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting 
     after ``constructed pursuant to this section'' the following: 
     ``and provide credit for the non-Federal share of the 
     project'';
       (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting ``; and''; and
       (D) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(C) if the construction work is substantially in 
     accordance with plans prepared under subsection (b).''.
       (2) Special rules.--Section 211(e)(2)(A) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-
     13(e)(2)(A)) is amended--
       (A) in the subparagraph heading, by inserting ``or credit'' 
     after ``Reimbursement'';
       (B) by striking ``subject to amounts being made available 
     in advance in appropriations Acts'' and inserting ``subject 
     to the availability of appropriations''; and
       (C) by inserting after ``the cost of such work'' the 
     following: ``, or provide credit (depending on the request of 
     the non-Federal interest) for the non-Federal share of such 
     work,''.
       (3) Schedule and manner of reimbursements.--Section 211(e) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
     701b-13(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(6) Schedule and manner of reimbursement.--
       ``(A) Budgeting.--The Secretary shall budget and request 
     appropriations for reimbursements under this section on a 
     schedule that is consistent with a Federal construction 
     schedule.
       ``(B) Commencement of reimbursements.--Reimbursements under 
     this section may commence on approval of a project by the 
     Secretary.
       ``(C) Credit.--At the request of a non-Federal interest, 
     the Secretary may reimburse the non-Federal interest by 
     providing credit toward future non-Federal costs of the 
     project.
       ``(D) Scheduling.--Nothing in this paragraph affects the 
     discretion of the President to schedule new construction 
     starts.''.

     SEC. 224. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

       Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
     (33 U.S.C. 1272) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)--
       (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``50'' and inserting 
     ``35''; and
       (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$50,000,000'';
       (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``non-Federal 
     responsibility'' and inserting ``shared as a cost of 
     construction''; and
       (3) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the following:
       ``(6) Passaic River and Newark Bay, New Jersey.
       ``(7) Snake Creek, Bixby, Oklahoma.
       ``(8) Willamette River, Oregon.''.

     SEC. 225. RECREATION USER FEES.

       (a) Withholding of Amounts.--
       (1) In general.--During fiscal years 1999 through 2002, the 
     Secretary may withhold from the special account established 
     under section 4(i)(1)(A) of the Land and Water Conservation 
     Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(i)(1)(A)) 100 percent of 
     the amount of receipts above a baseline of $34,000,000 per 
     each fiscal year received

[[Page 20065]]

     from fees imposed at recreation sites under the 
     administrative jurisdiction of the Department of the Army 
     under section 4(b) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(b)).
       (2) Use.--The amounts withheld shall be retained by the 
     Secretary and shall be available, without further Act of 
     appropriation, for expenditure by the Secretary in accordance 
     with subsection (b).
       (3) Availability.--The amounts withheld shall remain 
     available until September 30, 2005.
       (b) Use of Amounts Withheld.--In order to increase the 
     quality of the visitor experience at public recreational 
     areas and to enhance the protection of resources, the amounts 
     withheld under subsection (a) may be used only for--
       (1) repair and maintenance projects (including projects 
     relating to health and safety);
       (2) interpretation;
       (3) signage;
       (4) habitat or facility enhancement;
       (5) resource preservation;
       (6) annual operation (including fee collection);
       (7) maintenance; and
       (8) law enforcement related to public use.
       (c) Availability.--Each amount withheld by the Secretary 
     shall be available for expenditure, without further Act of 
     appropriation, at the specific project from which the amount, 
     above baseline, is collected.

     SEC. 226. SMALL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

       Section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), 
     is amended by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$3,000,000''.

     SEC. 227. USE OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISES.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall comply with the 
     requirements of the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act 
     of 1998 (31 U.S.C. 501 note; Public Law 105-270).
       (b) Compliance With Other Law.--
       (1) Inventory and review.--In carrying out this section, 
     the Secretary shall inventory and review all activities that 
     are not inherently governmental in nature in accordance with 
     the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998.
       (2) Architectural and engineering services.--Any review and 
     conversion by the Secretary to performance by private 
     enterprise of an architectural or engineering service 
     (including a surveying or mapping service) shall be carried 
     out in accordance with title IX of the Federal Property and 
     Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 541 et seq.).
                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

     SEC. 301. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, 
                   ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI.

       The Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation 
     Project, Alabama and Mississippi, authorized by section 
     601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
     Stat. 4138), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
     complete the project at a cost of $93,530,000, in accordance 
     with the post authorization change report dated August 17, 
     1998.

     SEC. 302. OUZINKIE HARBOR, ALASKA.

       (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be expended for the project for 
     navigation, Ouzinkie Harbor, Alaska, shall be $8,500,000.
       (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The 
     Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
     the project referred to in subsection (a) to take into 
     account the change in the Federal participation in the 
     project under subsection (a).

     SEC. 303. ST. PAUL HARBOR, ST. PAUL, ALASKA.

       The project for navigation, St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, 
     Alaska, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is 
     modified to include the construction of additional features 
     for a small boat harbor with an entrance channel and 
     maneuvering area dredged to a 20-foot depth and appropriate 
     wave protection features at an additional estimated total 
     cost of $12,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $5,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,700,000.

     SEC. 304. LOGGY BAYOU, RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, ARKANSAS, 
                   LOUISIANA, OKLAHOMA, AND TEXAS.

       The project for flood control on the Red River below 
     Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas, 
     authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 
     Stat. 647), is modified to direct the Secretary to conduct a 
     study to determine the feasibility of expanding the project 
     to include mile 0.0 to mile 7.8 of Loggy Bayou between the 
     Red River and Flat River.

     SEC. 305. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Sacramento 
     River, California, authorized by section 2 of the Act 
     entitled ``An Act to provide for the control of the floods of 
     the Mississippi River and of the Sacramento River, 
     California, and for other purposes'', approved March 1, 1917 
     (39 Stat. 949), and modified by section 102 of the Energy and 
     Water Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), 
     section 301(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3110), and title I of the Energy and Water 
     Development Appropriations Act, 1999 (112 Stat. 1841), is 
     further modified to authorize the Secretary--
       (1) to carry out the portion of the project at Glenn-
     Colusa, California, at a total cost of $26,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $20,000,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $6,000,000; and
       (2) to carry out bank stabilization work in the riverbed 
     gradient facility, particularly in the vicinity of River Mile 
     208, if the Secretary determines that such work is necessary 
     to protect the overall integrity of the project, on the 
     condition that additional environmental review of the project 
     is conducted.

     SEC. 306. SAN LORENZO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood control, San Lorenzo River, 
     California, authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3663), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to include as a part of 
     the project streambank erosion control measures to be 
     undertaken substantially in accordance with the report 
     entitled ``Bank Stabilization Concept, Laurel Street 
     Extension'', dated April 23, 1998, at a total cost of 
     $4,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,100,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,700,000.

     SEC. 307. TERMINUS DAM, KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Transfer of Title to Additional Land.--If the non-
     Federal interests for the project for flood control and water 
     supply, Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California, authorized by 
     section 101(b)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3667), transfer to the Secretary without 
     consideration title to perimeter lands acquired for the 
     project by the non-Federal interests, the Secretary may 
     accept the transfer of that title.
       (b) Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--Nothing in this 
     section changes, modifies, or otherwise affects the 
     responsibility of the non-Federal interests to provide land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material 
     disposal areas necessary for the Terminus Dam project and to 
     perform operation and maintenance for the project.
       (c) Operation and Maintenance.--On request by the non-
     Federal interests, the Secretary shall carry out operation, 
     maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the 
     project if the non-Federal interests enter into a binding 
     agreement with the Secretary to reimburse the Secretary for 
     100 percent of the costs of such operation, maintenance, 
     repair, replacement, and rehabilitation, and any other 
     expenses incurred by the Corps of Engineers under this 
     section.
       (d) Hold Harmless.--The non-Federal interests shall hold 
     the United States harmless for ownership, operation, and 
     maintenance of lands and facilities of the Terminus Dam 
     project title to which is transferred to the Secretary under 
     this section.

     SEC. 308. DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM AND CHANNEL DEEPENING, 
                   DELAWARE, NEW JERSEY, AND PENNSYLVANIA.

       The project for navigation, Delaware River Mainstem and 
     Channel Deepening, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, 
     authorized by section 101(6) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802), is modified as 
     follows:
       (1) Credit for engineering and design and construction 
     management work.--The Secretary may provide the non-Federal 
     interests credit, toward cash contributions required for 
     construction and subsequent to construction, for the costs of 
     engineering and design and construction management work that 
     is performed by the non-Federal interests and that the 
     Secretary determines is necessary to implement the project. 
     Any such credit shall reduce the Philadelphia District's 
     private sector performance goals for engineering work by the 
     amount of the credit.
       (2) Credit for costs of construction.--The Secretary may 
     provide the non-Federal interests credit, toward cash 
     contributions required during construction and subsequent to 
     construction, for the costs of construction performed by the 
     non-Federal interests on behalf of the Secretary and that the 
     Secretary determines is necessary to implement the project.
       (3) Payment of disposal or tipping fees.--The Secretary may 
     enter into an agreement with a non-Federal interest for the 
     payment of disposal or tipping fees for dredged material from 
     a Federal project, other than for the construction or 
     operation and maintenance of the new deepening project as 
     described in the Limited Reevaluation Report dated May 1997, 
     if the non-Federal interest has supplied the corresponding 
     disposal capacity.
       (4) Disposal area management plan.--The Secretary may enter 
     into an agreement with a non-Federal interest under which--
       (A) the non-Federal interest may carry out or cause to have 
     carried out on behalf of the Secretary a disposal area 
     management program for dredged material disposal areas 
     necessary to construct, operate, and maintain the project; 
     and
       (B) the Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal interest 
     for the costs of carrying out the program.

     SEC. 309. POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

       The project for flood control, Potomac River, Washington, 
     District of Columbia, authorized by section 5 of the Act of 
     June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1574, chapter 688), and modified by 
     section 301(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3707), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
     to construct the project at a Federal cost of $5,965,000, in 
     accordance with the post authorization change report dated 
     June 29, 1998.

     SEC. 310. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

       (a) Study.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     non-Federal interest, shall complete a study of any damage to 
     the project for shore protection, Brevard County, Florida, 
     authorized by section 101(b)(7) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667),

[[Page 20066]]

     to determine whether the damage is the result of a Federal 
     navigation project.
       (b) Conditions.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
     shall use the services of an independent coastal expert, who 
     shall consider all relevant studies completed by the Corps of 
     Engineers and the local sponsor of the project.
       (c) Mitigation of Damage.--After completion of the study, 
     the Secretary shall mitigate any damage to the shore 
     protection project that is the result of a Federal navigation 
     project. The costs of the mitigation shall be allocated to 
     the Federal navigation project as operation and maintenance 
     costs.

     SEC. 311. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

       The project for shore protection, Broward County and 
     Hillsboro Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the 
     River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090), is modified to 
     authorize the Secretary, on execution of a contract to 
     construct the project, to reimburse the non-Federal interest 
     for the Federal share of the cost of preconstruction planning 
     and design for the project, if the Secretary determines that 
     the work is compatible with and integral to the project.

     SEC. 312. LEE COUNTY, CAPTIVA ISLAND SEGMENT, FLORIDA, 
                   PERIODIC BEACH NOURISHMENT.

       (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lee 
     County, Captiva Island segment, Florida, authorized by 
     section 506(b)(3)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1996 (110 Stat. 3758), is modified to direct the Secretary 
     to enter into an agreement with the non-Federal interest to 
     carry out the project in accordance with section 206 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-1).
       (b) Decision Document.--The design memorandum approved in 
     1996 shall be the decision document supporting continued 
     Federal participation in cost sharing of the project.

     SEC. 313. FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA.

       (a) In General.--The project for shore protection and 
     harbor mitigation, Fort Pierce, Florida, authorized by 
     section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
     1092) and section 506(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is modified to 
     incorporate 1 additional mile into the project in accordance 
     with a final approved general reevaluation report, at a total 
     cost for initial nourishment for the entire project of 
     $9,128,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,073,500 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,054,500, at an average 
     annual cost of $556,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-
     year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal 
     cost of $431,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
     $125,000.
       (b) Periodic Beach Nourishment.--Periodic beach nourishment 
     is authorized for the project in accordance with section 
     506(a)(2) of Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
     Stat. 3757).

     SEC. 314. NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA.

       The project for beach erosion control, Nassau County 
     (Amelia Island), Florida, authorized by section 3(a)(3) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), 
     is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
     project at a total cost of $17,000,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $13,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $3,700,000, at an average annual cost of $1,177,000 for 
     periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, 
     with an estimated annual Federal cost of $807,000 and an 
     estimated annual non-Federal cost of $370,000.

     SEC. 315. MIAMI HARBOR CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

       The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel, Florida, 
     authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606), is modified to 
     include construction of artificial reefs and related 
     environmental mitigation required by Federal, State, and 
     local environmental permitting agencies for the project, if 
     the Secretary determines that the project as modified is 
     technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
     economically justified.

     SEC. 316. ST. AUGUSTINE, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA.

       The project for shore protection and storm damage 
     reduction, St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida, 
     authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4133) is modified to 
     include navigation mitigation as a project purpose and to be 
     carried by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the 
     general reevaluation report dated November 18, 1998, at a 
     total cost of $17,208,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $13,852,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,356,000, 
     and at an estimated average annual cost of $1,360,000 for 
     periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, 
     with an estimated annual Federal cost of $1,095,000 and an 
     estimated annual non-Federal cost of $265,000.

     SEC. 317. MILO CREEK, IDAHO.

       The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal interests for 
     65 percent of the reasonable costs of flood control for the 
     South Division Street Segment, Milo Creek Flood Control 
     Project, Idaho, to be constructed by the State of Idaho as 
     described in the provision entitled ``Add Alternative I'' in 
     the Milo Creek Phase II plans and specifications dated April 
     1999.

     SEC. 318. LAKE MICHIGAN, ILLINOIS.

       (a) In General.--The project for storm damage reduction and 
     shore protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette, 
     Illinois, to the Illinois-Indiana State line, authorized by 
     section 101(a)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3664), is modified to provide for 
     reimbursement for additional project work undertaken by the 
     non-Federal interest.
       (b) Credit or Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall credit or 
     reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of 
     project costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in 
     designing, constructing, or reconstructing reach 2F (700 feet 
     south of Fullerton Avenue and 500 feet north of Fullerton 
     Avenue), reach 3M (Meigs Field), and segments 7 and 8 of 
     reach 4 (43rd Street to 57th Street), if the non-Federal 
     interest carries out the work in accordance with plans 
     approved by the Secretary, at an estimated total cost of 
     $83,300,000.
       (c) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
     Federal interest for the Federal share of project costs 
     incurred by the non-Federal interest in reconstructing the 
     revetment structures protecting Solidarity Drive in Chicago, 
     Illinois, before the signing of the project cooperation 
     agreement, at an estimated total cost of $7,600,000.

     SEC. 319. SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS.

       Section 417 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3743) is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
     Secretary''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of assistance 
     provided under this section before, on, or after the date of 
     enactment of this subsection shall be 50 percent.''.

     SEC. 320. OGDEN DUNES, INDIANA.

       (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of beach 
     erosion in and around the town of Ogden Dunes, Indiana, to 
     determine whether the damage is the result of a Federal 
     navigation project.
       (b) Mitigation of Damage.--If the Secretary determines that 
     the damage described in subsection (a) is the result of a 
     Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall take 
     appropriate measures to mitigate the damage.
       (c) Cost.--The cost of the mitigation shall be allocated to 
     the Federal navigation project as an operation and 
     maintenance cost.

     SEC. 321. SAINT JOSEPH RIVER, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA.

       (a) Maximum Total Expenditure.--The maximum total 
     expenditure for the project for streambank erosion, 
     recreation, and pedestrian access features, Saint Joseph 
     River, South Bend, Indiana, shall be $7,800,000.
       (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The 
     Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
     the project referred to in subsection (a) to take into 
     account the change in the Federal participation in the 
     project under subsection (a).

     SEC. 322. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

       The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of 
     the White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act 
     entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
     public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
     other purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1586, 
     chapter 688), as modified by section 323 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake the 
     riverfront alterations described in the Central Indianapolis 
     Waterfront Concept Plan, dated February 1994, for the Canal 
     Development (Upper Canal feature) and the Beveridge Paper 
     feature, at a total cost not to exceed $25,000,000, of which 
     $12,500,000 is the estimated Federal cost and $12,500,000 is 
     the estimated non-Federal cost, except that no such 
     alterations may be undertaken unless the Secretary determines 
     that the alterations authorized by this section, in 
     combination with the alterations undertaken under section 323 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
     3716), are economically justified.

     SEC. 323. DUBUQUE, IOWA.

       The project for navigation, Dubuque, Iowa, authorized by 
     section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 
     482), is modified to authorize the development of a wetland 
     demonstration area of approximately 1.5 acres to be developed 
     and operated by the Dubuque County Historical Society or a 
     successor nonprofit organization.

     SEC. 324. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.

       The project for hurricane-flood protection, Lake 
     Pontchartrain, Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is modified--
       (1) to direct the Secretary to conduct a study to determine 
     the feasibility of constructing a pump adjacent to each of 
     the 4 proposed drainage structures for the Saint Charles 
     Parish feature of the project; and
       (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the pumps, with 
     a Federal cost of 65 percent, if the Secretary determines 
     that the project as modified is technically sound, 
     environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.

     SEC. 325. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LOUISIANA.

       The project for hurricane protection Larose to Golden 
     Meadow, Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is modified to authorize 
     the Secretary to convert the Golden Meadow floodgate into a 
     navigation lock if the Secretary determines that the 
     conversion is technically feasible, environmentally 
     acceptable, and economically justified.

     SEC. 326. LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY LEVEE, LOUISIANA.

       The Secretary may credit against the non-Federal share work 
     performed in the project area of the Louisiana State 
     Penitentiary Levee, Mississippi River, Louisiana, authorized 
     by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (100 Stat. 4117).

[[Page 20067]]



     SEC. 327. TWELVE-MILE BAYOU, CADDO PARISH, LOUISIANA.

       The Red River Below Denison Dam project, authorized by 
     section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 647), 
     is modified to incorporate the Twelve-Mile Bayou and levee 
     from its confluence with the Red River and levee 
     approximately 26 miles upstream to the vicinity of Black 
     Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana.

     SEC. 328. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY 
                   CANAL), LOUISIANA.

       (a) In General.--The project to prevent flood damage and 
     for hurricane damage reduction, west bank of the Mississippi 
     River (east of Harvey Canal), Louisiana, authorized by 
     section 401(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4128) and section 101(a)(17) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to continue Federal 
     operation and maintenance of the portion of the project 
     included in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated May 1, 
     1995, referred to as ``Algiers Channel''.
       (b) Combination of Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out 
     work authorized as part of the Westwego to Harvey Canal 
     project, the East of Harvey Canal project, and the Lake 
     Cataouatche modifications as a single project, to be known as 
     the ``West Bank and Vicinity, New Orleans, Louisiana, 
     Hurricane Protection Project'', with a combined total cost of 
     $280,300,000.

     SEC. 329. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL S-TURN, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND.

       The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, 
     Maryland, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 297), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary to straighten the Tolchester Channel S-turn as part 
     of project maintenance.

     SEC. 330. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

       The project for navigation Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa 
     County, Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) and 
     modified by section 330 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717), is further modified to provide 
     that the amount to be paid by non-Federal interests under 
     section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)) and section 330(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 shall not include any interest 
     payments.

     SEC. 331. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

       The project for environmental infrastructure, Jackson 
     County, Mississippi, authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835) and 
     modified by section 504 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is further modified to direct 
     the Secretary to provide a credit, not to exceed $5,000,000, 
     toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
     the costs incurred by the Jackson County Board of Supervisors 
     since February 8, 1994, in constructing the project, if the 
     Secretary determines that the work is compatible with and 
     integral to the project.

     SEC. 332. BOIS BRULE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, MISSOURI.

       (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be allocated for the project for flood 
     control, Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri, 
     authorized under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
     (33 U.S.C. 701s), is $15,000,000.
       (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The 
     Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
     the project referred to in subsection (a) to take into 
     account the change in Federal participation in the project 
     under subsection (a).
       (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section affects any 
     cost-sharing requirement applicable to the project referred 
     to in subsection (a) under title I of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.).

     SEC. 333. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK LEVEE, MISSOURI.

       The project for flood control, Meramec River Basin, Valley 
     Park Levee, Missouri, authorized by section 2(h) of the Act 
     entitled ``An Act to deauthorize several projects within the 
     jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers'' (Public Law 97-
     128; 95 Stat. 1682) and modified by section 1128 of the Water 
     Resources Developoment Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4246), is 
     further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
     project at a maximum Federal expenditure of $35,000,000, if 
     the Secretary determines that the project as modified is 
     technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
     economically justified.

     SEC. 334. MISSOURI RIVER MITIGATION PROJECT, MISSOURI, 
                   KANSAS, IOWA, AND NEBRASKA.

       (a) In General.--The project for mitigation of fish and 
     wildlife losses, Missouri River Bank Stabilization and 
     Navigation Project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, 
     authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143) is modified to 
     increase by 118,650 acres the amount of land and interests in 
     land to be acquired for the project.
       (b) Study.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with the 
     States of Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, shall conduct 
     a study to determine the cost of restoring, under the 
     authority of the Missouri River fish and wildlife mitigation 
     project, a total of 118,650 acres of lost Missouri River fish 
     and wildlife habitat.
       (2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall report to Congress 
     on the results of the study.

     SEC. 335. WOOD RIVER, GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA.

       The project for flood control, Wood River, Grand Island, 
     Nebraska, authorized by section 101(a)(19) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
     substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of 
     Engineers dated June 29, 1998, at a total cost of 
     $17,039,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,730,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,309,000.

     SEC. 336. ABSECON ISLAND, NEW JERSEY.

       The project for storm damage reduction and shore 
     protection, Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet, 
     Absecon Island, New Jersey, authorized by section 101(b)(13) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
     3668), is modified to provide that if, after October 12, 
     1996, the non-Federal interests carry out any work associated 
     with the project that is later recommended by the Chief of 
     Engineers and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may 
     provide the non-Federal interests credit toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the project in an amount equal 
     to the Federal share of the cost of the work, without 
     interest.

     SEC. 337. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, PORT JERSEY, 
                   NEW JERSEY.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, New York 
     Harbor and Adjacent Channels, New York and New Jersey, 
     authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098), is further modified 
     to authorize the Secretary to construct the portion of the 
     project that is located between Military Ocean Terminal 
     Bayonne and Global Terminal in Bayonne, New Jersey, at a 
     total cost of $103,267,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $76,909,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $26,358,000.
       (b) Limitation.--No funds may be obligated to carry out 
     work under the modification under subsection (a) until 
     completion of a final report by the Chief of Engineers 
     finding that the work is technically sound, environmentally 
     acceptable, and economically justified.

     SEC. 338. ARTHUR KILL, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Arthur Kill, 
     New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098) and 
     modified by section 301(b)(11) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), is further modified 
     to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
     substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of 
     Engineers dated July 23, 1999, at a total cost of 
     $315,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $183,200,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $132,500,000.
       (b) Credit.--The Secretary may provide non-Federal 
     interests--
       (1) credit toward cash contributions required prior to and 
     during construction and subsequent to construction for 
     planning, engineering, and design and construction management 
     work that is performed by non-Federal interests and that the 
     Secretary determines is necessary to implement the project; 
     and
       (2) credit toward cash contributions required during 
     construction and subsequent to construction for the costs of 
     construction carried out by the non-Federal interest on 
     behalf of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is 
     necessary to implement the project.

     SEC. 339. KILL VAN KULL AND NEWARK BAY CHANNELS, NEW YORK AND 
                   NEW JERSEY.

       The project for navigation, Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay 
     Channels, New York and New Jersey, authorized by chapter IV 
     of title I of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 
     Stat. 313), section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4095), and section 301(b)(12) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), is 
     further modified to authorize the Secretary to provide the 
     non-Federal interests credit toward cash contributions 
     required--
       (1) before, during, and after construction for planning, 
     engineering and design, and construction management work that 
     is performed by the non-Federal interests and that the 
     Secretary determines is necessary to implement the project; 
     and
       (2) during and after construction for the costs of the 
     construction that the non-Federal interests carry out on 
     behalf of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is 
     necessary to implement the project.

     SEC. 340. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.

       Section 552 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3779) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (d), by striking ``for the project to be 
     carried out with such assistance'' and inserting ``, or a 
     public entity designated by the State director, to carry out 
     the project with the assistance, subject to the project's 
     meeting the certification requirement of subsection (c)(1)''; 
     and
       (2) in subsection (i), by striking ``$22,500,000'' and 
     inserting ``$42,500,000''.

     SEC. 341. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

       Section 553(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``$8,000,000'' 
     and inserting ``$18,000,000''.

     SEC. 342. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NEW YORK.

       The project for combined beach erosion control and 
     hurricane protection, Fire Island Inlet

[[Page 20068]]

     to Montauk Point, Long Island, New York, authorized by 
     section 101(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 
     483) and modified by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1974, and the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986, is further modified to 
     direct the Secretary, in coordination with the heads of other 
     Federal departments and agencies, to complete all procedures 
     and reviews expeditiously and to adopt and submit to 
     Congress, not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 
     of this Act, a mutually acceptable shore erosion plan for the 
     Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the project.

     SEC. 343. BROKEN BOW LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLAHOMA.

       The project for flood control and water supply, Broken Bow 
     Lake, Red River Basin, Oklahoma, authorized by section 203 of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 309) and modified by 
     section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1187), 
     section 102(v) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (106 Stat. 4808), and section 338 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3720), is further modified 
     to require the Secretary to make seasonal adjustments to the 
     top of the conservation pool at the project, if the Secretary 
     determines that the adjustments will be undertaken at no cost 
     to the United States and will adequately protect affected 
     water and related resources, as follows:
       (1) Maintain an elevation of 599.5 from November 1 through 
     March 31.
       (2) Increase elevation gradually from 599.5 to 602.5 during 
     April and May.
       (3) Maintain an elevation of 602.5 from June 1 to September 
     30.
       (4) Decrease elevation gradually from 602.5 to 599.5 during 
     October.

     SEC. 344. WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, MCKENZIE 
                   SUBBASIN, OREGON.

       (a) In General.--The project for environmental restoration, 
     Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
     Oregon, authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
     substantially in accordance with the Feature Memorandum dated 
     July 31, 1998, at a total cost of $64,741,000, if the 
     Secretary determines that the project as modified is 
     technically sound and environmentally acceptable.
       (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
     a report that--
       (1) states the reasons for the increase in the cost of the 
     project;
       (2) outlines the steps that the Corps of Engineers is 
     taking to control project costs, including the application of 
     value engineering and other appropriate measures; and
       (3) includes a cost estimate for, and recommendations on 
     the advisability of, adding fish screens to the project.

     SEC. 345. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 562 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3784) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(a) In General.--The Secretary''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(b) Recreation Facilities.--The Secretary--
       ``(1) may provide design and construction assistance for 
     recreational facilities at Curwensville Lake; and
       ``(2) may require the non-Federal interest to provide not 
     more than 25 percent of the cost of designing and 
     constructing the recreational facilities.''.

     SEC. 346. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE.

       The project for navigation, Delaware River, Philadelphia to 
     Wilmington, Pennsylvania and Delaware, authorized by section 
     3(a)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
     Stat. 4014), is modified to authorize the Secretary to extend 
     the channel of the Delaware River at Camden, New Jersey, to 
     within 150 feet of the existing bulkhead and to relocate the 
     40-foot deep Federal navigation channel, eastward within 
     Philadelphia Harbor, from the Ben Franklin Bridge to the Walt 
     Whitman Bridge, into deep water, if the Secretary determines 
     that the project as modified is technically sound, 
     economically acceptable, and economically justified.

     SEC. 347. MUSSERS DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 209 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (106 Stat. 4830) is amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (e); and
       (2) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).

     SEC. 348. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 564(c)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3785) is amended by striking ``$2,700,000'' 
     and inserting ``$4,000,000''.

     SEC. 349. NINE MILE RUN, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

       If the Secretary determines that the documentation is 
     integral to the project, the Secretary shall credit against 
     the non-Federal share such costs, not to exceed $1,000,000, 
     as are incurred by the non-Federal interests in preparing the 
     environmental restoration report, planning and design-phase 
     scientific and engineering technical services documentation, 
     and other preconstruction documentation for the habitat 
     restoration project, Nine Mile Run, Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 350. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

       (a) Recreation Partnership Initiative.--Section 519(b) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2328 
     note; 110 Stat. 3765) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
       (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
       ``(3) Engineering and design services.--The Secretary may 
     perform engineering and design services for project 
     infrastructure expected to be associated with the development 
     of the site at Raystown Lake, Hesston, Pennsylvania.''.
       (b) Construction Assistance.--
       (1) In general.--Consistent with the master plan described 
     in section 318 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (106 Stat. 4848), the Secretary may provide a grant to 
     Juniata College for the construction of facilities and 
     structures at Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania, to interpret and 
     understand environmental conditions and trends. As a 
     condition of the receipt of financial assistance, officials 
     at Juniata College shall coordinate the construction with the 
     Baltimore District of the Army Corps of Engineers.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $5,000,000.

     SEC. 351. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

       (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 313(g)(1) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846; 
     110 Stat. 3723) is amended by striking ``$80,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$180,000,000''.
       (b) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Section 313(g) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(4) Corps of engineers expenses.--10 percent of the 
     amounts appropriated to carry out this section for each of 
     fiscal years 2000 through 2002 may be used by the Corps of 
     Engineers district offices to administer and implement 
     projects under this section at 100 percent Federal 
     expense.''.

     SEC. 352. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, PROVIDENCE, RHODE 
                   ISLAND.

       The project for hurricane-flood protection, Fox Point, 
     Providence, Rhode Island, authorized by section 203 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 306), is modified to 
     direct the Secretary to undertake the necessary repairs to 
     the barrier, as identified in the Condition Survey and 
     Technical Assessment dated April 1998, with Supplement dated 
     August 1998, at a total cost of $3,000,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $1,950,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $1,050,000.

     SEC. 353. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SOUTH CAROLINA.

       (a) In General.--The project for rediversion, Cooper River, 
     Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, authorized by section 101 
     of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731) and 
     modified by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 1992 (105 Stat. 517), is further modified 
     to authorize the Secretary to pay to the State of South 
     Carolina not more than $3,750,000 if the Secretary and the 
     State enter into a binding agreement for the State to perform 
     all future operation of the fish lift at St. Stephen, South 
     Carolina, including performance of studies to assess the 
     efficacy of the fish lift.
       (b) Contents of Agreement.--The agreement under subsection 
     (a) shall specify--
       (1) the terms and conditions under which payment will be 
     made; and
       (2) the rights of, and remedies available to, the Federal 
     Government to recover all or a portion of the payment if the 
     State suspends or terminates operation of the fish lift or 
     fails to operate the fish lift in a manner satisfactory to 
     the Secretary.
       (c) Maintenance.--Maintenance of the fish lift shall remain 
     a Federal responsibility.

     SEC. 354. CLEAR CREEK, TEXAS.

       Section 575 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3789) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)--
       (A) by inserting ``or nonstructural actions'' after ``flood 
     control works constructed''; and
       (B) by inserting ``or nonstructural actions'' after 
     ``construction of the project''; and
       (2) in subsection (b)--
       (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
     inserting ``; and''; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(4) the project for flood control, Clear Creek, Texas, 
     authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 
     (82 Stat. 742).''.

     SEC. 355. CYPRESS CREEK, TEXAS.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cypress 
     Creek, Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out a 
     nonstructural flood control project at a total cost of 
     $5,000,000.
       (b) Reimbursement for Work.--The Secretary may reimburse 
     the non-Federal interest for the Cypress Creek project for 
     work done by the non-Federal interest on the nonstructural 
     flood control project in an amount equal to the estimate of 
     the Federal share, without interest, of the cost of the 
     work--
       (1) if, after authorization and before initiation of 
     construction of the nonstructural project, the Secretary 
     approves the plans for construction of the nonstructural 
     project by the non-Federal interest; and
       (2) if the Secretary finds, after a review of studies and 
     design documents prepared to carry out the nonstructural 
     project, that construction of the nonstructural project is 
     economically justified and environmentally acceptable.

     SEC. 356. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, DALLAS, TEXAS.

       The project for flood control, Dallas Floodway Extension, 
     Dallas, Texas, authorized by section

[[Page 20069]]

     301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091) and 
     modified by section 351 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3724), is further modified to add 
     environmental restoration and recreation as project purposes.

     SEC. 357. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UTAH.

       The project for flood control, Upper Jordan River, Utah, 
     authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610) and modified by 
     section 301(a)(14) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3709), is further modified to direct the 
     Secretary to carry out the locally preferred project, 
     entitled ``Upper Jordan River Flood Control Project, Salt 
     Lake County, Utah--Supplemental Information'' and identified 
     in the document of Salt Lake County, Utah, dated July 30, 
     1998, at a total cost of $12,870,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $8,580,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $4,290,000, if the Secretary determines that the project 
     as modified is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, 
     and economically justified.

     SEC. 358. ELIZABETH RIVER, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA.

       Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after September 
     30, 1999, the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, shall not be 
     obligated to make the annual cash contribution required under 
     paragraph 1(9) of the Local Cooperation Agreement dated 
     December 12, 1978, between the Government and the city for 
     the project for navigation, southern branch of the Elizabeth 
     River, Chesapeake, Virginia.

     SEC. 359. COLUMBIA RIVER CHANNEL, WASHINGTON AND OREGON.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Columbia River 
     between Vancouver, Washington, and The Dalles, Oregon, 
     authorized by the first section of the Act of July 24, 1946 
     (60 Stat. 637, chapter 595), is modified to authorize the 
     Secretary to construct an alternate barge channel to traverse 
     the high span of the Interstate Route 5 bridge between 
     Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, Washington, to a depth of 17 
     feet, with a width of approximately 200 feet through the high 
     span of the bridge and a width of approximately 300 feet 
     upstream of the bridge.
       (b) Distance Upstream.--The channel shall continue upstream 
     of the bridge approximately 2,500 feet to about river mile 
     107, then to a point of convergence with the main barge 
     channel at about river mile 108.
       (c) Distance Downstream.--
       (1) Southern edge.--The southern edge of the channel shall 
     continue downstream of the bridge approximately 1,500 feet to 
     river mile 106+10, then turn northwest to tie into the edge 
     of the Upper Vancouver Turning Basin.
       (2) Northern edge.--The northern edge of the channel shall 
     continue downstream of the bridge to the Upper Vancouver 
     Turning Basin.

     SEC. 360. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3790) is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' 
     and inserting ``$47,000,000''.

     SEC. 361. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4810) is amended by striking ``take such 
     measures as are technologically feasible'' and inserting 
     ``implement Plan C/G, as defined in the Evaluation Report of 
     the District Engineer dated December 1996,''.

     SEC. 362. MOOREFIELD, WEST VIRGINIA.

       Effective October 1, 1999, the project for flood control, 
     Moorefield, West Virginia, authorized by section 101(a)(25) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 
     4610), is modified to provide that the non-Federal interest 
     shall not be required to pay the unpaid balance, including 
     interest, of the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project.

     SEC. 363. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

       Section 581 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3790) is amended by striking subsection (a) and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may design and construct--
       ``(1) flood control measures in the Cheat and Tygart River 
     basins, West Virginia, at a level of protection that is 
     sufficient to prevent any future losses to communities in the 
     basins from flooding such as occurred in January 1996, but 
     not less than a 100-year level of protection; and
       ``(2) structural and nonstructural flood control, 
     streambank protection, stormwater management, and channel 
     clearing and modification measures in the lower Allegheny, 
     lower Monongahela, West Branch Susquehanna, and Juniata River 
     basins, Pennsylvania, at a level of protection that is 
     sufficient to prevent any future losses to communities in the 
     basins from flooding such as occurred in January 1996, but 
     not less than a 100-year level of flood protection with 
     respect to measures that incorporate levees or floodwalls.''.

     SEC. 364. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

       Each of the following projects is authorized to be carried 
     out by the Secretary, if the Secretary determines that the 
     project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
     economically justified, as appropriate:
       (1) Indian river county, florida.--The project for shore 
     protection, Indian River County, Florida, authorized by 
     section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4134) and deauthorized under section 1001(b)(1) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
     579a(b)(1)).
       (2) Lido key beach, sarasota, florida.--
       (A) In general.--The project for shore protection, Lido Key 
     Beach, Sarasota, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the 
     River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819) and deauthorized 
     under section 1001(b) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), at a total cost of $5,200,000, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $3,380,000 and an estimated 
     non-Federal cost of $1,820,000.
       (B) Periodic nourishment.--The Secretary may carry out 
     periodic nourishment for the project for a 50-year period at 
     an estimated average annual cost of $602,000, with an 
     estimated annual Federal cost of $391,000 and an estimated 
     annual non-Federal cost of $211,000.
       (3) Cass river, michigan (vassar).--The project for flood 
     protection, Cass River, Michigan (Vassar), authorized by 
     section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 311) 
     and deauthorized under section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
       (4) Saginaw river, michigan (shiawassee flats).--The 
     project for flood control, Saginaw River, Michigan 
     (Shiawassee Flats), authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 311) and deauthorized under 
     section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
       (5) Park river, grafton, north dakota.--The project for 
     flood control, Park River, Grafton, North Dakota, authorized 
     by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (100 Stat. 4121) and deauthorized under section 1001(a) 
     of that Act (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)), at a total cost of 
     $28,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $18,265,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,835,000.
       (6) Memphis harbor, memphis, tennessee.--The project for 
     navigation, Memphis Harbor, Memphis, Tennessee, authorized by 
     section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4145) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(a) 
     of that Act (33 U.S.C 579a(a)), is authorized to be carried 
     out by the Secretary.

     SEC. 365. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

       (a) In General.--The following projects or portions of 
     projects are not authorized after the date of enactment of 
     this Act:
       (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
     authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
     (72 Stat. 297), consisting of a 2.4-acre anchorage area, 9 
     feet deep, and an adjacent 0.6-acre anchorage, 6 feet deep, 
     located on the west side of Johnsons River.
       (2) Clinton harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Clinton Harbor, Connecticut, 
     authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 
     13, chapter 19), and House Document 240, 76th Congress, 1st 
     Session, lying upstream of a line designated by the points 
     N158,592.12, E660,193.92 and N158,444.58, E660,220.95.
       (3) Bass harbor, maine.--The following portions of the 
     project for navigation, Bass Harbor, Maine, authorized on May 
     7, 1962, under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
       (A) Beginning at a bend in the project, N149040.00, 
     E538505.00, thence running easterly about 50.00 feet along 
     the northern limit of the project to a point N149061.55, 
     E538550.11, thence running southerly about 642.08 feet to a 
     point, N14877.64, E538817.18, thence running southwesterly 
     about 156.27 feet to a point on the westerly limit of the 
     project, N148348.50, E538737.02, thence running northerly 
     about 149.00 feet along the westerly limit of the project to 
     a bend in the project, N148489.22, E538768.09, thence running 
     northwesterly about 610.39 feet along the westerly limit of 
     the project to the point of origin.
       (B) Beginning at a point on the westerly limit of the 
     project, N148118.55, E538689.05, thence running southeasterly 
     about 91.92 feet to a point, N148041.43, E538739.07, thence 
     running southerly about 65.00 feet to a point, N147977.86, 
     E538725.51, thence running southwesterly about 91.92 feet to 
     a point on the westerly limit of the project, N147927.84, 
     E538648.39, thence running northerly about 195.00 feet along 
     the westerly limit of the project to the point of origin.
       (4) Boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for navigation, 
     Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of July 25, 
     1912 (37 Stat. 201, chapter 253).
       (5) Bucksport harbor, maine.--The portion of the project 
     for navigation, Bucksport Harbor, Maine, authorized by the 
     first section of the Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 331, 
     chapter 1079), consisting of a 16-foot deep channel beginning 
     at a point N268.748.16, E423.390.76, thence running north 47 
     degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds east 51.76 feet to a point 
     N268.783.44, E423.428.64, thence running north 67 degrees 54 
     minutes 32 seconds west 1513.94 feet to a point N269.352.81, 
     E422.025.84, thence running south 47 degrees 02 minutes 23 
     seconds west 126.15 feet to a point N269.266.84, E421.933.52, 
     thence running south 70 degrees 24 minutes 28 seconds east 
     1546.79 feet to the point of origin.
       (6) Carvers harbor, vinalhaven, maine.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Maine, 
     authorized by the Act of June 3, 1896 (commonly known as the 
     ``River and Harbor Appropriations Act of 1896'') (29 Stat. 
     202, chapter 314), consisting of the 16-foot anchorage 
     beginning at a point with coordinates N137,502.04, 
     E895,156.83, thence running south 6 degrees 34 minutes 57.6 
     seconds west 277.660 feet to a point N137,226.21, 
     E895,125.00, thence running north 53 degrees, 5 minutes 42.4 
     seconds west 127.746 feet to a point

[[Page 20070]]

     N137,302.92, E895022.85, thence running north 33 degrees 56 
     minutes 9.8 seconds east 239.999 feet to the point of origin.
       (7) East boothbay harbor, maine.--Section 364 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 is amended by striking 
     paragraph (9) (110 Stat. 3734) and inserting the following:
       ``(9) East boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for 
     navigation, East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the 
     first section of the Act entitled `An Act making 
     appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation 
     of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
     purposes', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 631, chapter 
     382).''.
       (8) Searsport harbor, searsport, maine.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Searsport Harbor, Searsport, Maine, 
     authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 
     (76 Stat. 1173), consisting of the 35-foot turning basin 
     beginning at a point with coordinates N225,008.38, 
     E395,464.26, thence running north 43 degrees 49 minutes 53.4 
     seconds east 362.001 feet to a point N225,269.52, 
     E395,714.96, thence running south 71 degrees 27 minutes 33.0 
     seconds east 1,309.201 feet to a point N224,853.22, 
     E396,956.21, thence running north 84 degrees 3 minutes 45.7 
     seconds west 1,499.997 feet to the point of origin.
       (9) Wells harbor, maine.--The following portions of the 
     project for navigation, Wells Harbor, Maine, authorized by 
     section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 
     480):
       (A) The portion of the 6-foot channel the boundaries of 
     which begin at a point with coordinates N177,992.00, 
     E394,831.00, thence running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 14.8 
     seconds west 10.38 feet to a point N177,990.91, E394,820.68, 
     thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 47.7 seconds west 
     991.76 feet to a point N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence 
     running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east 10.00 
     feet to a point N177,018.00, E394,628.00, thence running 
     north 11 degrees 46 minutes 22.8 seconds east 994.93 feet to 
     the point of origin.
       (B) The portion of the 6-foot anchorage the boundaries of 
     which begin at a point with coordinates N177,778.07, 
     E394,336.96, thence running south 51 degrees 58 minutes 32.7 
     seconds west 15.49 feet to a point N177,768.53, E394,324.76, 
     thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 26.5 seconds west 
     672.87 feet to a point N177,109.82, E394,187.46, thence 
     running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east 10.00 
     feet to a point N177,107.78, E394,197.25, thence running 
     north 11 degrees 46 minutes 25.4 seconds east 684.70 feet to 
     the point of origin.
       (C) The portion of the 10-foot settling basin the 
     boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
     N177,107.78, E394,197.25, thence running north 78 degrees 13 
     minutes 45.7 seconds west 10.00 feet to a point N177,109.82, 
     E394,187.46, thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 15.7 
     seconds west 300.00 feet to a point N176,816.13, E394,126.26, 
     thence running south 78 degrees 12 minutes 21.4 seconds east 
     9.98 feet to a point N176,814.09, E394,136.03, thence running 
     north 11 degrees 46 minutes 29.1 seconds east 300.00 feet to 
     the point of origin.
       (D) The portion of the 10-foot settling basin the 
     boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
     N177,018.00, E394,628.00, thence running north 78 degrees 13 
     minutes 45.7 seconds west 10.00 feet to a point N177,020.04, 
     E394,618.21, thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 44.0 
     seconds west 300.00 feet to a point N176,726.36, E394,556.97, 
     thence running south 78 degrees 12 minutes 30.3 seconds east 
     10.03 feet to a point N176,724.31, E394,566.79, thence 
     running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 22.4 seconds east 300.00 
     feet to the point of origin.
       (10) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, 
     authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 
     (62 Stat. 1172) lying southeasterly of a line commencing at a 
     point N199,286.41, E844,394.91, thence running north 66 
     degrees 52 minutes 3.31 seconds east 472.95 feet to a point 
     N199,472.21, E844,829.83, thence running north 43 degrees 9 
     minutes 28.3 seconds east 262.64 feet to a point N199,633.80, 
     E845,009.48, thence running north 21 degrees 40 minutes 11.26 
     seconds east 808.38 feet to a point N200,415.05, E845,307.98, 
     thence running north 32 degrees 25 minutes 29.01 seconds east 
     160.76 feet to a point N200,550.75, E845,394.18, thence 
     running north 24 degrees 56 minutes 42.29 seconds east 
     1,410.29 feet to a point N201,829.48, E845,988.97.
       (11) Green harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Green Harbor, Massachusetts, 
     undertaken pursuant to section 107 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), consisting of the 6-foot deep 
     channel beginning at a point along the west limit of the 
     existing project, north 395990.43, east 831079.16, thence 
     running northwesterly about 752.85 feet to a point, north 
     396722.80, east 830904.76, thence running northwesterly about 
     222.79 feet to a point along the west limit of the existing 
     project, north 396844.34, east 830718.04, thence running 
     southwesterly about 33.72 feet along the west limit of the 
     existing project to a point, north 396810.80, east 830714.57, 
     thence running southeasterly about 195.42 feet along the west 
     limit of the existing project to a point, north 396704.19, 
     east 830878.35, thence running about 544.66 feet along the 
     west limit of the existing project to a point, north 
     396174.35, east 831004.52, thence running southeasterly about 
     198.49 feet along the west limit of the existing project to 
     the point of beginning.
       (12) New bedford and fairhaven harbor, massachusetts.--The 
     following portions of the project for navigation, New Bedford 
     and Fairhaven Harbor, Massachusetts:
       (A) A portion of the 25-foot spur channel leading to the 
     west of Fish Island, authorized by section 3 of the Act of 
     March 3, 1909 (35 Stat. 816, chapter 264), beginning at a 
     point with coordinates N232,173.77, E758,791.32, thence 
     running south 27 degrees 36 minutes 52.8 seconds west 38.2 
     feet to a point N232,139.91, E758,773.61, thence running 
     south 87 degrees 35 minutes 31.6 seconds west 196.84 feet to 
     a point N232,131.64, E758,576.94, thence running north 47 
     degrees 47 minutes 48.4 seconds west 502.72 feet to a point 
     N232,469.35, E758,204.54, thence running north 10 degrees 10 
     minutes 20.3 seconds west 438.88 feet to a point N232,901.33, 
     E758,127.03, thence running north 79 degrees 49 minutes 43.1 
     seconds east 121.69 feet to a point N232,922.82, E758,246.81, 
     thence running south 04 degrees 29 minutes 17.6 seconds east 
     52.52 feet to a point N232,870.46, E758,250.92, thence 
     running south 23 degrees 56 minutes 11.2 seconds east 49.15 
     feet to a point N323,825.54, E758,270.86, thence running 
     south 79 degrees 49 minutes 27.0 seconds west 88.19 feet to a 
     point N232,809.96, E758,184.06, thence running south 10 
     degrees 10 minutes 25.7 seconds east 314.83 feet to a point 
     N232,500.08, E758,239.67, thence running south 56 degrees 33 
     minutes 56.1 seconds east 583.07 feet to a point N232,178.82, 
     E758,726.25, thence running south 85 degrees 33 minutes 16.0 
     seconds east to the point of origin.
       (B) A portion of the 30-foot west maneuvering basin, 
     authorized by the first section of the Act of July 3, 1930 
     (46 Stat. 918, chapter 847), beginning at a point with 
     coordinates N232,139.91, E758,773.61, thence running north 81 
     degrees 49 minutes 30.1 seconds east 160.76 feet to a point 
     N232,162.77, E758.932.74, thence running north 85 degrees 33 
     minutes 16.0 seconds west 141.85 feet to a point N232,173.77, 
     E758,791.32, thence running south 27 degrees 36 minutes 52.8 
     seconds west to the point of origin.
       (b) Anchorage Area, Clinton Harbor, Connecticut.--The 
     portion of the Clinton Harbor, Connecticut, navigation 
     project referred to in subsection (a)(2) beginning at a point 
     with coordinates N158,444.58, E660,220.95, thence running 
     north 79 degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds east 833.31 feet to a 
     point N158,594.72, E661,040.67, thence running south 80 
     degrees 51 minutes 53 seconds east 181.21 feet to a point 
     N158,565.95, E661,219.58, thence running north 57 degrees 38 
     minutes 04 seconds west 126.02 feet to a point N158,633.41, 
     E660,113.14, thence running south 79 degrees 37 minutes 14 
     seconds west 911.61 feet to a point N158,469.17, E660,216.44, 
     thence running south 10 degrees 22 minutes 46 seconds east 25 
     feet returning to a point N158,444.58, E660,220.95, is 
     redesignated as an anchorage area.
       (c) Wells Harbor, Maine.--
       (1) Project modification.--The Wells Harbor, Maine, 
     navigation project referred to in subsection (a)(9) is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to realign the channel 
     and anchorage areas based on a harbor design capacity of 150 
     craft.
       (2) Redesignations.--
       (A) 6-foot anchorage.--The following portions of the Wells 
     Harbor, Maine, navigation project referred to in subsection 
     (a)(9) shall be redesignated as part of the 6-foot anchorage:
       (i) The portion of the 6-foot channel the boundaries of 
     which begin at a point with coordinates N177,990.91, 
     E394,820.68, thence running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 40.8 
     seconds west 94.65 feet to a point N177,980.98, E394,726.55, 
     thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 22.4 seconds west 
     962.83 feet to a point N177,038.40, E394,530.10, thence 
     running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east 90.00 
     feet to a point N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running 
     north 11 degrees 46 minutes 47.7 seconds east 991.76 feet to 
     the point of origin.
       (ii) The portion of the 10-foot inner harbor settling basin 
     the boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
     N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running north 78 degrees 13 
     minutes 30.5 seconds west 160.00 feet to a point N177,052.69, 
     E394,461.58, thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 45.4 
     seconds west 299.99 feet to a point N176,759.02, E394,400.34, 
     thence running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds east 
     160 feet to a point N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running 
     north 11 degrees 46 minutes 44.0 seconds east 300.00 feet to 
     the point of origin.
       (B) 6-foot channel.--The following portion of the Wells 
     Harbor, Maine, navigation project referred to in subsection 
     (a)(9) shall be redesignated as part of the 6-foot channel: 
     the portion of the 6-foot anchorage the boundaries of which 
     begin at a point with coordinates N178,102.26, E394,751.83, 
     thence running south 51 degrees 59 minutes 42.1 seconds west 
     526.51 feet to a point N177,778.07, E394,336.96, thence 
     running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 26.6 seconds west 511.83 
     feet to a point N177,277.01, E394,232.52, thence running 
     south 78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds east 80.00 feet to a 
     point N177,260.68, E394,310.84, thence running north 11 
     degrees 46 minutes 24.8 seconds east 482.54 feet to a point 
     N177,733.07, E394,409.30, thence running north 51 degrees 59 
     minutes 41.0 seconds east 402.63 feet to a point N177,980.98, 
     E394,726.55, thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 27.6 
     seconds east 123.89 feet to the point of origin.
       (3) Realignment.--The 6-foot anchorage area described in 
     paragraph (2)(B) shall be realigned to include the area 
     located south of the inner harbor settling basin in existence 
     on the date of enactment of this Act beginning at a point 
     with coordinates N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running 
     north 78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds west 160.00 feet to 
     a point N176,759.02, E394,400.34, thence running south 11 
     degrees 47 minutes 03.8 seconds west 45 feet to a point 
     N176,714.97, E394,391.15, thence running south

[[Page 20071]]

     78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds 160.00 feet to a point 
     N176,682.31, E394,547.78, thence running north 11 degrees 47 
     minutes 03.8 seconds east 45 feet to the point of origin.
       (4) Relocation.--The Secretary may relocate the settling 
     basin feature of the Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation project 
     referred to in subsection (a)(9) to the outer harbor between 
     the jetties.
       (5) Additional actions.--In carrying out the operation and 
     the maintenance of the Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation 
     project referred to in subsection (a)(9), the Secretary shall 
     undertake each of the actions of the Corps of Engineers 
     specified in section IV(B) of the memorandum of agreement 
     relating to the project dated January 20, 1998, including the 
     actions specified in section IV(B) that the parties agreed to 
     ask the Corps of Engineers to undertake.
       (6) Conservation easement.--The Secretary of the Interior, 
     acting through the Director of the United States Fish and 
     Wildlife Service, may accept a conveyance of the right, but 
     not the obligation, to enforce a conservation easement to be 
     held by the State of Maine over certain land owned by the 
     town of Wells, Maine, that is adjacent to the Rachel Carson 
     National Wildlife Refuge.
       (d) Anchorage Area, Green Harbor, Massachusetts.--The 
     portion of the Green Harbor, Massachusetts, navigation 
     project referred to in subsection (a)(11) consisting of a 6-
     foot deep channel that lies northerly of a line the 
     coordinates of which are North 394825.00, East 831660.00 and 
     North 394779.28, East 831570.64 is redesignated as an 
     anchorage area.

     SEC. 366. AMERICAN AND SACRAMENTO RIVERS, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
     American and Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by 
     section 101(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3662-3663), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary to include the following improvements as part of 
     the overall project:
       (1) Raising the left bank of the non-Federal levee upstream 
     of the Mayhew Drain for a distance of 4,500 feet by an 
     average of 2.5 feet.
       (2) Raising the right bank of the American River levee from 
     1,500 feet upstream to 4,000 feet downstream of the Howe 
     Avenue bridge by an average of 1 foot.
       (3) Modifying the south levee of the Natomas Cross Canal 
     for a distance of 5 miles to ensure that the south levee is 
     consistent with the level of protection provided by the 
     authorized levee along the east bank of the Sacramento River.
       (4) Modifying the north levee of the Natomas Cross Canal 
     for a distance of 5 miles to ensure that the height of the 
     levee is equivalent to the height of the south levee as 
     authorized by paragraph (3).
       (5) Installing gates to the existing Mayhew Drain culvert 
     and pumps to prevent backup of floodwater on the Folsom 
     Boulevard side of the gates.
       (6) Installing a slurry wall in the north levee of the 
     American River from the east levee of the Natomas east Main 
     Drain upstream for a distance of approximately 1.2 miles.
       (7) Installing a slurry wall in the north levee of the 
     American River from 300 feet west of Jacob Lane north for a 
     distance of approximately 1 mile to the end of the existing 
     levee.
       (b) Cost Limitations.--Section 101(a)(1)(A) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662) is amended 
     by striking ``at a total cost of'' and all that follows 
     through ``$14,225,000,'' and inserting the following: ``at a 
     total cost of $91,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $68,925,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $22,975,000,''.
       (c) Cost Sharing.--For the purposes of section 103 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), the 
     modifications authorized by this section shall be subject to 
     the same cost sharing in effect for the project for flood 
     damage reduction, American and Sacramento Rivers, California, 
     authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662).

     SEC. 367. MARTIN, KENTUCKY.

       The project for flood control, Martin, Kentucky, authorized 
     by section 202(a) of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is modified to 
     authorize the Secretary to take all necessary measures to 
     prevent future losses that would occur as a result of a flood 
     equal in magnitude to a 100-year frequency event.

     SEC. 368. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA PILOT PROGRAM.

       Section 340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is amended to read as follows:
       ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out the pilot program under this 
     section $40,000,000 for fiscal years beginning after 
     September 30, 1992. Such sums shall remain available until 
     expended.''.

     SEC. 369. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, JACKSON, 
                   ALABAMA.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Black Warrior 
     and Tombigbee Rivers, vicinity of Jackson, Alabama, 
     authorized by section 106 of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 1987 (100 Stat. 3341-199), is modified to 
     authorize the Secretary to acquire land for mitigation of the 
     habitat losses attributable to the project, including the 
     navigation channel, dredged material disposal areas, and 
     other areas directly affected by construction of the project.
       (b) Construction Before Acquisition of Mitigation Land.--
     Notwithstanding section 906 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283), the Secretary may 
     construct the project before acquisition of the mitigation 
     land if the Secretary takes such actions as are necessary to 
     ensure that any required mitigation land will be acquired not 
     later than 2 years after initiation of construction of the 
     new channel and that the acquisition will fully mitigate any 
     adverse environmental impacts resulting from the project.

     SEC. 370. TROPICANA WASH AND FLAMINGO WASH, NEVADA.

       Any Federal costs associated with the Tropicana Wash and 
     Flamingo Wash, Nevada, authorized by section 101(13) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), 
     incurred by the non-Federal interest to accelerate or modify 
     construction of the project, in cooperation with the Corps of 
     Engineers, shall be eligible for reimbursement by the 
     Secretary.

     SEC. 371. COMITE RIVER, LOUISIANA.

       The Comite River Diversion Project for flood control, 
     authorized as part of the project for flood control, Amite 
     River and Tributaries, Louisiana, by section 101(11) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802) and 
     modified by section 301(b)(5) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3709), is further modified 
     to authorize the Secretary to include the costs of highway 
     relocations to be cost shared as a project construction 
     feature.

     SEC. 372. ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN.

       The project for navigation, St. Marys River, Michigan, is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to provide an additional 
     foot of overdraft between Point Louise Turn and the Locks, 
     Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, consistent with the channels 
     upstream of Point Louise Turn. The modification shall be 
     carried out as operation and maintenance to improve 
     navigation safety.

     SEC. 373. CHARLEVOIX, MICHIGAN.

       The Secretary shall review and, if consistent with 
     authorized project purposes, reimburse the city of 
     Charlevoix, Michigan, for the Federal share of costs 
     associated with construction of the new revetment connection 
     to the Federal navigation project at Charlevoix Harbor, 
     Michigan.

     SEC. 374. WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

       (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the project for 
     flood control, power generation, and other purposes at the 
     White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by 
     section 4 of the Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218, chapter 
     795), and modified by House Document 917, 76th Congress, 3d 
     Session, and House Document 290, 77th Congress, 1st Session, 
     approved August 18, 1941, and House Document 499, 83d 
     Congress, 2d Session, approved September 3, 1954, and by 
     section 304 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3711) is further modified to authorize the 
     Secretary to provide minimum flows necessary to sustain tail 
     water trout fisheries by reallocating the following amounts 
     of project storage: Beaver Lake, 1.5 feet; Table Rock, 2 
     feet; Bull Shoals Lake, 5 feet; Norfork Lake, 3.5 feet; and 
     Greers Ferry Lake, 3 feet.
       (b) Report.--
       (1) In general.--No funds may be obligated to carry out 
     work on the modification under subsection (a) until 
     completion of a final report by the Chief of Engineers 
     finding that the work is technically sound, environmentally 
     acceptable, and economically justified.
       (2) Timing.--The Secretary shall submit the report to 
     Congress not later than July 30, 2000.
       (3) Contents.--The report shall include determinations 
     concerning whether--
       (A) the modification under subsection (a) adversely affects 
     other authorized project purposes; and
       (B) Federal costs will be incurred in connection with the 
     modification.

     SEC. 375. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA, WATER CONVEYANCE 
                   FACILITIES.

       For the project for construction of the water conveyances 
     authorized by the first section of Public Law 88-253 (77 
     Stat. 841), the requirements for the Waurika Project Master 
     Conservancy District to repay the $2,900,000 in costs 
     (including interest) resulting from the October 1991 
     settlement of the claim before the United States Claims 
     Court, and to make a payment of $595,000 of the final cost 
     representing a portion of the difference between the 1978 
     estimate of cost and the actual cost determined after 
     completion of the project in 1991, are waived.
                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

     SEC. 401. DEEP DRAFT HARBOR COST SHARING.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall undertake a study of 
     non-Federal cost-sharing requirements for the construction 
     and operation and maintenance of deep draft harbor projects 
     to determine whether--
       (1) cost sharing adversely affects United States port 
     development or domestic and international trade; and
       (2) any revision of the cost-sharing requirements would 
     benefit United States domestic and international trade.
       (b) Recommendations.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than May 30, 2001, the Secretary 
     shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
     of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure of the House of Representatives any 
     recommendations that the Secretary may have in light of the 
     study under subsection (a).
       (2) Considerations.--In making recommendations, the 
     Secretary shall consider--
       (A) the potential economic, environmental, and budgetary 
     impacts of any proposed revision of the cost-sharing 
     requirements; and
       (B) the effect that any such revision would have on 
     regional port competition.

[[Page 20072]]



     SEC. 402. BOYDSVILLE, ARKANSAS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of the reservoir and associated improvements to 
     provide for flood control, recreation, water quality, and 
     fish and wildlife purposes in the vicinity of Boydsville, 
     Arkansas.

     SEC. 403. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARKANSAS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of constructing water intake facilities at Greers 
     Ferry Lake, Arkansas.

     SEC. 404. DEL NORTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of designating a permanent disposal site for 
     dredged material from Federal navigation projects in Del 
     Norte County, California.

     SEC. 405. FRAZIER CREEK, TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine--
       (1) the feasibility of restoring Frazier Creek, Tulare 
     County, California; and
       (2) the Federal interest in flood control, environmental 
     restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife resources, 
     recreation, and water quality of the creek.

     SEC. 406. MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a general 
     reevaluation to determine the Federal interest in 
     reconfiguring the Mare Island Strait channel.
       (b) Considerations.--In determining the Federal interest, 
     the Secretary shall consider the benefits of economic 
     activity associated with potential future uses of the channel 
     and any other benefits that could be realized by increasing 
     the width and depth of the channel to accommodate both 
     current and potential future uses of the channel.

     SEC. 407. STRAWBERRY CREEK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine--
       (1) the feasibility of restoring Strawberry Creek, 
     Berkeley, California; and
       (2) the Federal interest in environmental restoration, 
     conservation of fish and wildlife resources, recreation, and 
     water quality of the creek.

     SEC. 408. SWEETWATER RESERVOIR, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of the potential water 
     quality problems and pollution abatement measures in the 
     watershed in and around Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego 
     County, California.

     SEC. 409. WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall complete a study to determine the 
     feasibility of a flood damage reduction project in the 
     Whitewater River basin (also known as ``Thousand Palms''), 
     California.

     SEC. 410. DESTIN-NORIEGA POINT, FLORIDA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of--
       (1) restoring Noriega Point, Florida, to serve as a 
     breakwater for Destin Harbor; and
       (2) including Noriega Point as part of the East Pass, 
     Florida, navigation project.

     SEC. 411. LITTLE ECONLACKHATCHEE RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of pollution abatement 
     measures in the Little Econlackhatchee River basin, Florida.

     SEC. 412. PORT EVERGLADES, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of constructing a sand bypassing project at the 
     Port Everglades Inlet, Florida.

     SEC. 413. LAKE ALLATOONA, ETOWAH RIVER, AND LITTLE RIVER 
                   WATERSHED, GEORGIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, may 
     carry out the following water-related environmental 
     restoration and resource protection investigations into 
     restoring Lake Allatoona, the Etowah River, and the Little 
     River watershed, Georgia:
       (1) Lake allatoona/etowah river shoreline restoration 
     investigation.--Feasibility phase investigation to identify 
     and recommend to Congress structural and nonstructural 
     measures to alleviate shore erosion and sedimentation 
     problems along the shores of Lake Allatoona and the Etowah 
     River.
       (2) Little river environmental restoration investigation.--
     Feasibility phase investigation to evaluate environmental 
     problems and recommend environmental restoration measures 
     (including appropriate environmental structural and 
     nonstructural measures) for the Little River watershed, 
     Georgia.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
     to be appropriated for the period beginning with fiscal year 
     2000--
       (1) $850,000 to carry out subsection (a)(1); and
       (2) $500,000 to carry out subsection (a)(2).

     SEC. 414. BOISE, IDAHO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking flood control on the Boise River 
     in Boise, Idaho.

     SEC. 415. GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED, OAKLEY, IDAHO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking flood damage reduction, water 
     conservation, ground water recharge, ecosystem restoration, 
     and related activities along the Goose Creek watershed near 
     Oakley, Idaho.

     SEC. 416. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of restoring and repairing the Lava Rock Little 
     Wood River Containment System to prevent flooding in the city 
     of Gooding, Idaho.

     SEC. 417. SNAKE RIVER, LEWISTON, IDAHO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking bank stabilization and flood 
     control on the Snake River at Lewiston, Idaho.

     SEC. 418. SNAKE RIVER AND PAYETTE RIVER, IDAHO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking a flood control project along the 
     Snake River and Payette River, in the vicinity of Payette, 
     Idaho.

     SEC. 419. UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ILLINOIS 
                   AND WISCONSIN.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
     upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and 
     Wisconsin, upstream of the confluence with Salt Creek at 
     Riverside, Illinois, to determine the feasibility of 
     improvements in the interests of flood damage reduction, 
     environmental restoration and protection, water quality, 
     recreation, and related purposes.
       (b) Special Rule.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
     may not exclude from consideration and evaluation flood 
     damage reduction measures based on restrictive policies 
     regarding the frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and 
     the amount of runoff.
       (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In carrying out 
     this section, the Secretary shall--
       (1) consult with appropriate Federal and State agencies; 
     and
       (2) make maximum use of data in existence on the date of 
     enactment of this Act and ongoing programs and efforts of 
     Federal agencies and States.

     SEC. 420. CAMERON PARISH WEST OF CALCASIEU RIVER, LOUISIANA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking a storm damage reduction and 
     ecosystem restoration project for Cameron Parish west of 
     Calcasieu River, Louisiana.

     SEC. 421. COASTAL LOUISIANA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of using dredged material from maintenance 
     activities at Federal navigation projects in coastal 
     Louisiana to benefit coastal areas in the State.

     SEC. 422. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LOUISIANA.

       In carrying out a study of the storm damage reduction 
     benefits to Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana, the Secretary 
     shall include benefits that a storm damage reduction project 
     for Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana, may have on the 
     mainland coast of Louisiana as project benefits attributable 
     to the Grand Isle project.

     SEC. 423. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY ECOSYSTEM, CHEF MENTEUR 
                   TO SABINE RIVER, LOUISIANA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem 
     restoration and protection measures along the Gulf 
     Intracoastal Waterway from Chef Menteur to Sabine River, 
     Louisiana.
       (b) Matters To Be Addressed.--The study shall address 
     saltwater intrusion, tidal scour, erosion, compaction, 
     subsidence, wind and wave action, bank failure, and other 
     problems relating to ecosystem restoration and protection.

     SEC. 424. MUDDY RIVER, BROOKLINE AND BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the January 
     1999 study commissioned by the Boston Parks and Recreation 
     Department, Boston, Massachusetts, and entitled ``The Emerald 
     Necklace Environmental Improvement Master Plan, Phase I Muddy 
     River Flood Control, Water Quality and Habitat Enhancement'', 
     to determine whether the plans outlined in the study for 
     flood control, water quality, habitat enhancements, and other 
     improvements to the Muddy River in Brookline and Boston, 
     Massachusetts, are cost-effective, technically sound, 
     environmentally acceptable, and in the Federal interest.
       (b) Report.--Not later than June 30, 2000, the Secretary 
     shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
     evaluation.

     SEC. 425. WESTPORT, MASSACHUSETTS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of undertaking a navigation project 
     for the town of Westport, Massachusetts.
       (b) Considerations.--In determining the benefits of the 
     project, the Secretary shall include the benefits derived 
     from using dredged material for shore protection and storm 
     damage reduction.

     SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

       (a) Plan.--The Secretary, in coordination with State and 
     local governments and appropriate Federal and provincial 
     authorities of Canada, shall develop a comprehensive 
     management plan for St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair.
       (b) Elements.--The plan shall include the following 
     elements:
       (1) Identification of the causes and sources of 
     environmental degradation.
       (2) Continuous monitoring of organic, biological, metallic, 
     and chemical contamination levels.
       (3) Timely dissemination of information of contamination 
     levels to public authorities, other interested parties, and 
     the public.
       (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
     a report that includes the plan developed under subsection 
     (a) and recommendations for potential restoration measures.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $400,000.

[[Page 20073]]



     SEC. 427. ST. CLAIR SHORES, MICHIGAN.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of constructing a flood control project at St. 
     Clair Shores, Michigan.

     SEC. 428. WOODTICK PENINSULA, MICHIGAN, AND TOLEDO HARBOR, 
                   OHIO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of using dredged material from Toledo Harbor, 
     Ohio, to provide erosion reduction, navigation, and ecosystem 
     restoration at Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan.

     SEC. 429. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISSISSIPPI.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine an alternative plan for dredged material management 
     for the Pascagoula River portion of the project for 
     navigation, Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, authorized by 
     section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4094).
       (b) Contents.--The study under subsection (a) shall--
       (1) include an analysis of the feasibility of expanding the 
     Singing River Island Disposal Area or constructing a new 
     dredged material disposal facility; and
       (2) identify methods of managing and reducing sediment 
     transport into the Federal navigation channel.

     SEC. 430. TUNICA LAKE WEIR, MISSISSIPPI.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of constructing an outlet weir at 
     Tunica Lake, Tunica County, Mississippi, and Lee County, 
     Arkansas, for the purpose of stabilizing water levels in the 
     lake.
       (b) Economic Analysis.--In carrying out the study, the 
     Secretary shall include as part of the economic analysis the 
     benefits derived from recreation uses at Tunica Lake and 
     economic benefits associated with restoration of fish and 
     wildlife habitat.

     SEC. 431. YELLOWSTONE RIVER, MONTANA.

       (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive 
     study of the Yellowstone River from Gardiner, Montana, to the 
     confluence of the Missouri River to determine the hydrologic, 
     biological, and socioeconomic cumulative impacts on the 
     river.
       (b) Consultation and Coordination.--The Secretary shall 
     conduct the study in consultation with the United States Fish 
     and Wildlife Service, the United States Geological Survey, 
     and the Natural Resources Conservation Service and with the 
     full participation of the State of Montana and tribal and 
     local entities, and provide for public participation.
       (c) Report.--Not later than 5 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
     a report on the results of the study.

     SEC. 432. LAS VEGAS VALLEY, NEVADA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
     comprehensive study of water resources in the Las Vegas 
     Valley, Nevada.
       (b) Objectives.--The study shall identify problems and 
     opportunities related to ecosystem restoration, water quality 
     (particularly the quality of surface runoff), and flood 
     control.

     SEC. 433. SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking a project for flood damage 
     reduction in the Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

     SEC. 434. CAYUGA CREEK, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking a project for flood control for 
     Cayuga Creek, New York.

     SEC. 435. LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NEW YORK AND VERMONT.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of restoring Lake Champlain, New York and 
     Vermont, to improve water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, 
     and navigation.

     SEC. 436. OSWEGO RIVER BASIN, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of establishing a flood forecasting system in the 
     Oswego River basin, New York.

     SEC. 437. WHITE OAK RIVER, NORTH CAROLINA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether 
     there is a Federal interest in a project for water quality, 
     environmental restoration and protection, and related 
     purposes on the White Oak River, North Carolina.

     SEC. 438. ARCOLA CREEK WATERSHED, MADISON, OHIO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking a project to provide environmental 
     restoration and protection for the Arcola Creek watershed, 
     Madison, Ohio.

     SEC. 439. CLEVELAND HARBOR, CLEVELAND, OHIO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking repairs and related navigation 
     improvements at Dike 14, Cleveland, Ohio.

     SEC. 440. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OHIO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking navigation improvements on the 
     Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio.

     SEC. 441. WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OHIO, INDIANA, AND 
                   MICHIGAN.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     develop measures to improve flood control, navigation, water 
     quality, recreation, and fish and wildlife habitat in a 
     comprehensive manner in the western Lake Erie basin, Ohio, 
     Indiana, and Michigan, including watersheds of the Maumee, 
     Ottawa, and Portage Rivers.
       (b) Cooperation.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
     shall--
       (1) cooperate with interested Federal, State, and local 
     agencies and nongovernmental organizations; and
       (2) consider all relevant programs of the agencies.
       (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
     a report on the results of the study, including findings and 
     recommendations.

     SEC. 442. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking a project for flood control for 
     the Schuylkill River, Norristown, Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 443. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL AREAS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall review pertinent 
     reports and conduct other studies and field investigations to 
     determine the best available science and methods for 
     management of contaminated dredged material and sediments in 
     the coastal areas of South Carolina.
       (b) Focus.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary 
     shall place particular focus on areas where the Corps of 
     Engineers maintains deep draft navigation projects, such as 
     Charleston Harbor, Georgetown Harbor, and Port Royal, South 
     Carolina.
       (c) Cooperation.--The studies shall be conducted in 
     cooperation with the appropriate Federal and State 
     environmental agencies.

     SEC. 444. SANTEE DELTA FOCUS AREA, SOUTH CAROLINA.

       Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of 
     this Act, the Secretary shall complete a comprehensive study 
     of the ecosystem in the Santee Delta focus area, South 
     Carolina, to determine the feasibility of undertaking a 
     project to enhance wetland habitat and public recreational 
     opportunities in the area.

     SEC. 445. WACCAMAW RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking a flood control project for the 
     Waccamaw River in Horry County, South Carolina.

     SEC. 446. DAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA.

       The Secretary shall conduct--
       (1) an investigation of flooding and other water resources 
     problems between the James River and Big Sioux watersheds, 
     South Dakota; and
       (2) an assessment of flood damage reduction needs of the 
     area.

     SEC. 447. NIOBRARA RIVER AND MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Niobrara River 
     watershed and the operations of Fort Randall Dam and Gavins 
     Point Dam on the Missouri River, South Dakota, to determine 
     the feasibility of alleviating the bank erosion, 
     sedimentation, and related problems in the lower Niobrara 
     River and the Missouri River below Fort Randall Dam.

     SEC. 448. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.

       The Secretary shall include, as part of the study 
     authorized by a resolution of the Committee on Public Works 
     and Transportation of the House of Representatives dated 
     August 1, 1990, a review of two 175-foot-wide barge shelves 
     on either side of the navigation channel at the Port of 
     Corpus Christi, Texas.

     SEC. 449. MITCHELL'S CUT CHANNEL (CANEY FORK CUT), TEXAS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking a project for navigation, 
     Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney Fork Cut), Texas.

     SEC. 450. MOUTH OF COLORADO RIVER, TEXAS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of undertaking a project for navigation at the 
     mouth of the Colorado River, Texas, to provide a minimum 
     draft navigation channel extending from the Colorado River 
     through Parkers Cut (also known as ``Tiger Island Cut''), or 
     an acceptable alternative, to Matagorda Bay.

     SEC. 451. SANTA CLARA RIVER, UTAH.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to 
     alleviate damage caused by flooding, bank erosion, and 
     sedimentation along the watershed of the Santa Clara River, 
     Utah, above the Gunlock Reservoir.
       (b) Contents.--The study shall include an analysis of 
     watershed conditions and water quality, as related to 
     flooding and bank erosion, along the Santa Clara River in the 
     vicinity of Gunlock, Utah.

     SEC. 452. MOUNT ST. HELENS, WASHINGTON.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem 
     restoration improvements throughout the Cowlitz and Toutle 
     River basins, Washington, including the 6,000 acres of 
     wetland, riverine, riparian, and upland habitats lost or 
     altered due to the eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980 and 
     subsequent emergency actions.
       (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
     shall--
       (1) work in close coordination with local governments, 
     watershed entities, the State of Washington, and other 
     Federal agencies; and
       (2) place special emphasis on--
       (A) conservation and restoration strategies to benefit 
     species that are listed or proposed for listing as threatened 
     or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 
     1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
       (B) other watershed restoration objectives.

     SEC. 453. KANAWHA RIVER, FAYETTE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of developing a public port

[[Page 20074]]

     along the Kanawha River in Fayette County, West Virginia, at 
     a site known as ``Longacre''.

     SEC. 454. WEST VIRGINIA PORTS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of expanding public port development in West 
     Virginia along the Ohio River and the navigable portion of 
     the Kanawha River from its mouth to river mile 91.0.

     SEC. 455. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

       (a) Strategic Plans.--
       (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive 
     study of the Great Lakes region to ensure the future use, 
     management, and protection of water resources and related 
     resources of the Great Lakes basin.
       (2) Report.--
       (A) In general.--As expeditiously as possible, but not 
     later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, 
     and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to 
     the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works of the Senate a report outlining a strategic 
     plan for Corps of Engineers programs and proposed Corps of 
     Engineers projects in the Great Lakes basin.
       (B) Contents.--The plan shall include--
       (i) details of projects in the Great Lakes region relating 
     to--

       (I) navigation improvements, maintenance, and operations 
     for commercial and recreational vessels;
       (II) environmental restoration activities;
       (III) water level maintenance activities;
       (IV) technical and planning assistance to States and 
     remedial action planning committees;
       (V) sediment transport analysis, sediment management 
     planning, and activities to support prevention of excess 
     sediment loadings;
       (VI) flood damage reduction and shoreline erosion 
     prevention; and
       (VII) all other relevant activities of the Corps of 
     Engineers; and

       (ii) an analysis of factors limiting use of programs and 
     authorities of the Corps of Engineers in existence on the 
     date of enactment of this Act in the Great Lakes basin, 
     including the need for new or modified authorities.
       (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for 
     the period of fiscal years 2000 through 2003.
       (b) Great Lakes Biohydrological Information.--
       (1) Inventory.--
       (A) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall request each 
     Federal agency that may possess information relevant to the 
     Great Lakes biohydrological system to provide an inventory of 
     all such information in the possession of the agency.
       (B) Relevant information.--For the purpose of subparagraph 
     (A), relevant information includes information on--
       (i) ground and surface water hydrology;
       (ii) natural and altered tributary dynamics;
       (iii) biological aspects of the system influenced by and 
     influencing water quantity and water movement;
       (iv) meteorological projections and the impacts of weather 
     conditions on Great Lakes water levels; and
       (v) other Great Lakes biohydrological system data relevant 
     to sustainable water use management.
       (2) Report.--
       (A) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with 
     the States, Indian tribes, and Federal agencies, and after 
     requesting information from the provinces and the federal 
     government of Canada, shall--
       (i) compile the inventories of information;
       (ii) analyze the information for consistency and gaps; and
       (iii) submit to Congress, the International Joint 
     Commission, and the Great Lakes States a report that includes 
     recommendations on ways to improve the information base on 
     the biohydrological dynamics of the Great Lakes ecosystem as 
     a whole, so as to support environmentally sound decisions 
     regarding diversions and consumptive uses of Great Lakes 
     water.
       (B) Recommendations.--The recommendations in the report 
     under subparagraph (A) shall include recommendations relating 
     to the resources and funds necessary for implementing 
     improvement of the information base.
       (C) Considerations.--In developing the report under 
     subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     Secretary of State, the Secretary of Transportation, and the 
     heads of other agencies as appropriate, shall consider and 
     report on the status of the issues described and 
     recommendations made in--
       (i) the Report of the International Joint Commission to the 
     Governments of the United States and Canada under the 1977 
     reference issued in 1985; and
       (ii) the 1993 Report of the International Joint Commission 
     to the Governments of Canada and the United States on Methods 
     of Alleviating Adverse Consequences of Fluctuating Water 
     Levels in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Basin.
       (c) Great Lakes Recreational Boating.--Not later than 18 
     months after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
     Secretary, using information and studies in existence on the 
     date of enactment of this Act to the extent practicable, and 
     in cooperation with the Great Lakes States, shall submit to 
     Congress a report detailing the economic benefits of 
     recreational boating in the Great Lakes basin, particularly 
     at harbors benefiting from operation and maintenance projects 
     of the Corps of Engineers.
       (d) Cooperation.--In undertaking activities under this 
     section, the Secretary shall--
       (1) encourage public participation; and
       (2) cooperate, and, as appropriate, collaborate, with Great 
     Lakes States, tribal governments, and Canadian federal, 
     provincial, and tribal governments.
       (e) Water Use Activities and Policies.--The Secretary may 
     provide technical assistance to the Great Lakes States to 
     develop interstate guidelines to improve the consistency and 
     efficiency of State-level water use activities and policies 
     in the Great Lakes basin.
       (f) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary may seek and accept funds 
     from non-Federal entities to be used to pay up to 25 percent 
     of the cost of carrying out subsections (b), (c), (d), and 
     (e).

     SEC. 456. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEM.

       In consultation with the St. Lawrence Seaway Development 
     Corporation, the Secretary shall review the Great Lakes 
     Connecting Channel and Harbors Report dated March 1985 to 
     determine the feasibility of undertaking any modification of 
     the recommendations made in the report to improve commercial 
     navigation on the Great Lakes navigation system, including 
     locks, dams, harbors, ports, channels, and other related 
     features.

     SEC. 457. NUTRIENT LOADING RESULTING FROM DREDGED MATERIAL 
                   DISPOSAL.

       (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of nutrient 
     loading that occurs as a result of discharges of dredged 
     material into open-water sites in the Chesapeake Bay.
       (b) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
     a report on the results of the study.

     SEC. 458. UPPER MISSISSIPPI AND ILLINOIS RIVERS LEVEES AND 
                   STREAMBANKS PROTECTION.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study of erosion damage to 
     levees and other flood control structures on the upper 
     Mississippi and Illinois Rivers and the impact of increased 
     barge and pleasure craft traffic on deterioration of the 
     levees and other flood control structures.

     SEC. 459. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

       (a) Development.--The Secretary shall develop a plan to 
     address water resource and related land resource problems and 
     opportunities in the upper Mississippi and Illinois River 
     basins, from Cairo, Illinois, to the headwaters of the 
     Mississippi River, in the interest of systemic flood damage 
     reduction by means of--
       (1) structural and nonstructural flood control and 
     floodplain management strategies;
       (2) continued maintenance of the navigation project;
       (3) management of bank caving and erosion;
       (4) watershed nutrient and sediment management;
       (5) habitat management;
       (6) recreation needs; and
       (7) other related purposes.
       (b) Contents.--The plan under subsection (a) shall--
       (1) contain recommendations on management plans and actions 
     to be carried out by the responsible Federal and non-Federal 
     entities;
       (2) specifically address recommendations to authorize 
     construction of a systemic flood control project for the 
     upper Mississippi River; and
       (3) include recommendations for Federal action where 
     appropriate and recommendations for follow-on studies for 
     problem areas for which data or current technology does not 
     allow immediate solutions.
       (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In carrying out 
     this section, the Secretary shall--
       (1) consult with appropriate Federal and State agencies; 
     and
       (2) make maximum use of data in existence on the date of 
     enactment of this Act and ongoing programs and efforts of 
     Federal agencies and States in developing the plan under 
     subsection (a).
       (d) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) Development.--Development of the plan under subsection 
     (a) shall be at Federal expense.
       (2) Feasibility studies.--Feasibility studies resulting 
     from development of the plan shall be subject to cost sharing 
     under section 105 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).
       (e) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
     of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works of the Senate a report that includes the plan 
     under subsection (a).

     SEC. 460. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of 
     controlling and managing waterborne debris in the interest of 
     navigation, flood control, environmental restoration, and 
     other purposes in the Susquehanna River Basin, New York, 
     Pennsylvania, and Maryland, and the upper Chesapeake Bay, 
     Maryland.
       (b) Evaluation of Technologies and Practices.--The study 
     shall include an evaluation of technologies and practices 
     currently available, in use, or in development in the United 
     States for debris removal programs at various dams and 
     harbors and recommendations for applying those techniques and 
     practices in the Susquehanna River and the upper Chesapeake 
     Bay.
       (c) Cooperation.--The study shall be conducted in 
     cooperation with State agencies and other Federal agencies, 
     the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, and owners of major 
     dams.

[[Page 20075]]


                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

     SEC. 501. CORPS ASSUMPTION OF NRCS PROJECTS.

       (a) Llagas Creek, California.--The Secretary may complete 
     the remaining reaches of the Natural Resources Conservation 
     Service flood control project at Llagas Creek, California, 
     undertaken pursuant to section 5 of the Watershed Protection 
     and Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1005), substantially in 
     accordance with the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
     watershed plan for Llagas Creek, Department of Agriculture, 
     and in accordance with the requirements of local cooperation 
     as specified in section 4 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1004), at a 
     total cost of $45,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $21,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,200,000.
       (b) Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, Illinois.--
       (1) In general.--The Thornton Reservoir project, an element 
     of the project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow Plan, 
     Illinois, authorized by section 3(a)(5) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to include additional 
     permanent flood control storage attributable to the Natural 
     Resources Conservation Service Thornton Reservoir (Structure 
     84), Little Calumet River Watershed, Illinois, approved under 
     the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 
     1001 et seq.).
       (2) Limitation.--No funds may be obligated to carry out 
     work under the modification under paragraph (1) until 
     completion and approval by the Secretary of a final report by 
     the Chief of Engineers finding that the work is technically 
     sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
     justified.
       (3) Cost sharing.--Costs for the Thornton Reservoir project 
     shall be shared in accordance with section 103 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
       (4) Transitional storage.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
     cooperate with non-Federal interests to provide, on a 
     transitional basis, flood control storage for the Natural 
     Resources Conservation Service Thornton Reservoir (Structure 
     84) project in the west lobe of the Thornton quarry.
       (5) Credit toward non-federal share.--The Secretary may 
     credit toward the non-Federal share of the costs of the 
     Thornton Reservoir project all design and construction costs 
     incurred by the non-Federal interests before the date of 
     signing of the project cooperation agreement.
       (6) Reevaluation report.--The Secretary shall determine the 
     credits authorized by paragraph (5) that are integral to the 
     Thornton Reservoir project and the current total project 
     costs based on a limited reevaluation report.

     SEC. 502. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

       (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757) is 
     amended by striking paragraphs (5) and (6) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(5) $25,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(2);
       ``(6) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(9);
       ``(7) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(16); and
       ``(8) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
     (c)(17).''.
       (b) Additional Assistance.--Section 219 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1992 is amended by adding at the 
     end the following:
       ``(f) Additional Assistance.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance under subsection (a) and assistance for 
     construction for the following:
       ``(1) Atlanta, georgia.--The project described in 
     subsection (c)(2), modified to include $25,000,000 for 
     watershed restoration and development in the regional Atlanta 
     watershed, including Big Creek and Rock Creek.
       ``(2) Paterson, passaic county, and passaic valley, new 
     jersey.--The project described in subsection (c)(9), modified 
     to include $20,000,000 for drainage facilities to alleviate 
     flooding problems on Getty Avenue in the vicinity of St. 
     Joseph's Hospital for the city of Paterson, New Jersey, and 
     Passaic County, New Jersey, and innovative facilities to 
     manage and treat additional flows in the Passaic Valley, 
     Passaic River basin, New Jersey.
       ``(3) Nashua, new hampshire.--$20,000,000 for a project to 
     eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
     Nashua, New Hampshire.
       ``(4) Fall river and new bedford, massachusetts.--
     $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined 
     sewer overflows in the cities of Fall River and New Bedford, 
     Massachusetts.
       ``(5) Findlay township, pennsylvania.--$11,000,000 for 
     water and wastewater infrastructure in Findlay Township, 
     Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
       ``(6) Dillsburg borough authority, pennsylvania.--
     $2,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure in 
     Franklin Township, York County, Pennsylvania.
       ``(7) Hampden township, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 for 
     water, sewer, and storm sewer improvements in Hampden 
     Township, Pennsylvania.
       ``(8) Towamencin township, pennsylvania.--$1,500,000 for 
     sanitary sewer and water and wastewater infrastructure in 
     Towamencin Township, Pennsylvania.
       ``(9) Dauphin county, pennsylvania.--$2,000,000 for a 
     project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows and 
     water system rehabilitation for the city of Harrisburg, 
     Dauphin County, Pennsylvania.
       ``(10) Eastern shore and southwest virginia.--$20,000,000 
     for water supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in 
     the counties of Accomac, Northampton, Lee, Norton, Wise, 
     Scott, Russell, Dickenson, Buchanan, and Tazewell, Virginia.
       ``(11) Northeast pennsylvania.--$20,000,000 for water 
     related infrastructure in the counties of Lackawanna, 
     Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, Wayne, Sullivan, 
     Bradford, and Monroe, Pennsylvania, including assistance for 
     the Mountoursville Regional Sewer Authority, Lycoming County, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(12) Calumet region, indiana.--$10,000,000 for water 
     related infrastructure projects in the counties of Lake and 
     Porter, Indiana.
       ``(13) Clinton county, pennsylvania.--$1,000,000 for water 
     related infrastructure in Clinton County, Pennsylvania.
       ``(14) Patton township, pennsylvania.--$1,400,000 for water 
     related infrastructure in Patton Township, Pennsylvania.
       ``(15) North fayette township, allegheny county, 
     pennsylvania.--$500,000 for water related infrastructure in 
     North Fayette Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
       ``(16) Springdale borough, pennsylvania.--$500,000 for 
     water related infrastructure in Springdale Borough, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(17) Robinson township, pennsylvania.--$1,200,000 for 
     water related infrastructure in Robinson Township, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(18) Upper allen township, pennsylvania.--$3,400,000 for 
     water related infrastructure in Upper Allen Township, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(19) Jefferson township, greene county, pennsylvania.--
     $1,000,000 for water-related infrastructure in Jefferson 
     Township, Greene County, Pennsylvania.
       ``(20) Lumberton, north carolina.--$1,700,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure projects in Lumberton, North 
     Carolina.
       ``(21) Baton rouge, louisiana.--$10,000,000 for water 
     related infrastructure for the parishes of East Baton Rouge, 
     Ascension, and Livingston, Louisiana.
       ``(22) East san joaquin county, california.--$25,000,000 
     for ground water recharge and conjunctive use projects in 
     Stockton East Water District, California.
       ``(23) Sacramento area, california.--$25,000,000 for 
     regional water conservation and recycling projects in Placer 
     and El Dorado Counties and the San Juan Suburban Water 
     District, California.
       ``(24) Cumberland county, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water 
     supply projects in Cumberland County, Tennessee.
       ``(25) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--
     $5,000,000 for water supply treatment and distribution 
     projects in the counties of Calhoun, Clarendon, Colleton, 
     Dorchester, Orangeberg, and Sumter, South Carolina.
       ``(26) Bridgeport, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a project 
     to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city 
     of Bridgeport, Connecticut.
       ``(27) Hartford, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a project to 
     eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
     Hartford, Connecticut.
       ``(28) New haven, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a project 
     to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city 
     of New Haven, Connecticut.
       ``(29) Oakland county, michigan.--$20,000,000 for a project 
     to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the 
     cities of Berkley, Ferndale, Madison Heights, Royal Oak, 
     Birmingham, Hazel Park, Oak Park, Southfield, Clawson, 
     Huntington Woods, Pleasant Ridge, and Troy, and the village 
     of Beverly Hills, and the Charter Township of Royal Oak, 
     Michigan.
       ``(30) Desoto county, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for a 
     wastewater treatment project in the county of DeSoto, 
     Mississippi.
       ``(31) Kansas city, missouri.--$15,000,000 for a project to 
     eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
     Kansas City, Missouri.
       ``(32) St. louis, missouri.--$15,000,000 for a project to 
     eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
     St. Louis, Missouri.
       ``(33) Elizabeth, new jersey.--$20,000,000 for a project to 
     eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
     Elizabeth, New Jersey.
       ``(34) North hudson, new jersey.--$10,000,000 for a project 
     to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city 
     of North Hudson, New Jersey.
       ``(35) Inner harbor project, new york, new york.--
     $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined 
     sewer overflows for the inner harbor project, New York, New 
     York.
       ``(36) Outer harbor project, new york, new york.--
     $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined 
     sewer overflows for the outer harbor project, New York, New 
     York.
       ``(37) Lebanon, new hampshire.--$8,000,000 for a project to 
     eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
     Lebanon, New Hampshire.
       ``(38) Astoria, oregon.--$5,000,000 for a project to 
     eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
     Astoria, Oregon.
       ``(39) Cache county, utah.--$5,000,000 for a wastewater 
     infrastructure project for Cache County, Utah.
       ``(40) Lawton, oklahoma.--$5,000,000 for a wastewater 
     infrastructure project for the city of Lawton, Oklahoma.
       ``(41) Lancaster, california.--$1,500,000 for a project to 
     provide water facilities for the Fox Field Industrial 
     Corridor, Lancaster, California.
       ``(42) San ramon valley, california.--$15,000,000 for a 
     project for recycled water for San Ramon Valley, California.
       ``(43) Harbor/south bay, california.--$15,000,000 for an 
     industrial water reuse project for the Harbor/South Bay area, 
     California.''.

[[Page 20076]]



     SEC. 503. CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT DREDGING TECHNOLOGY.

       (a) Review of Innovative Dredging Technologies.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than June 1, 2001, the Secretary 
     shall complete a review of innovative dredging technologies 
     designed to minimize or eliminate contamination of a water 
     column upon removal of contaminated sediments.
       (2) Testing.--
       (A) Selection of technology.--After completion of the 
     review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall select, from 
     among the technologies reviewed, the technology that the 
     Secretary determines will best increase the effectiveness of 
     removing contaminated sediments and significantly reduce 
     contamination of the water column.
       (B) Agreement.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall enter into an agreement with a public or 
     private entity to test the selected technology in the 
     vicinity of Peoria Lakes, Illinois.
       (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $2,000,000.
       (b) Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Technologies.--
     Section 8 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 
     U.S.C. 2314) is amended--
       (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
     (c) and (d), respectively; and
       (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
       ``(b) Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Technologies for 
     Management of Contaminated Sediments.--
       ``(1) Test projects.--The Secretary shall approve an 
     appropriate number of projects to test, under actual field 
     conditions, innovative technologies for environmentally sound 
     management of contaminated sediments.
       ``(2) Demonstration projects.--The Secretary may approve an 
     appropriate number of projects to demonstrate innovative 
     technologies that have been pilot tested under paragraph (1).
       ``(3) Conduct of projects.--Each pilot project under 
     paragraph (1) and demonstration project under paragraph (2) 
     shall be conducted by a university with proven expertise in 
     the research and development of contaminated sediment 
     treatment technologies and innovative applications using 
     waste materials.
       ``(4) Location.--At least 1 of the projects under this 
     subsection shall be conducted in New England by the 
     University of New Hampshire.''.

     SEC. 504. DAM SAFETY.

       (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to 
     enhance dam safety at the following locations:
       (1) Healdsburg Veteran's Memorial Dam, California.
       (2) Kehly Run Dam, Pennsylvania.
       (3) Sweet Arrow Lake Dam, Pennsylvania.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $6,000,000.

     SEC. 505. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS.

       Section 401(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1990 (33 U.S.C. 1268 note; 104 Stat. 4644; 110 Stat. 3763) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``Non-Federal'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(A) In general.--Non-Federal''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(B) Contributions by entities.--Nonprofit public or 
     private entities may contribute all or a portion of the non-
     Federal share.''.

     SEC. 506. PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

       Section 1135(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(c)) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``If the Secretary'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) In general.--If the Secretary''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Control of sea lamprey.--Congress finds that--
       ``(A) the Great Lakes navigation system has been 
     instrumental in the spread of sea lamprey and the associated 
     impacts on its fishery; and
       ``(B) the use of the authority under this subsection for 
     control of sea lamprey at any Great Lakes basin location is 
     appropriate.''.

     SEC. 507. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

       Section 509(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3759) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(12) Acadiana Navigation Channel, Louisiana.
       ``(13) Contraband Bayou, Louisiana, as part of the 
     Calcasieu River and Pass Ship Channel.
       ``(14) Lake Wallula Navigation Channel, Washington.
       ``(15) Wadley Pass (also known as `McGriff Pass'), Suwanee 
     River, Florida.''.

     SEC. 508. MEASUREMENTS OF LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSIONS, ILLINOIS.

       Section 1142(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (100 Stat. 4253) is amended by striking ``$250,000 per 
     fiscal year for each fiscal year beginning after September 
     30, 1986,'' and inserting ``$1,250,000 for each of fiscal 
     years 1999 through 2003''.

     SEC. 509. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
                   PROGRAM.

       (a) Authorized Activities.--Section 1103(e) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is 
     amended by striking ``(e)(1)'' and all that follows through 
     the end of paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
       ``(e) Program Authority.--
       ``(1) Authority.--
       ``(A) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
     Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, may undertake, as 
     identified in the master plan--
       ``(i) a program for the planning, construction, and 
     evaluation of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
     rehabilitation and enhancement; and
       ``(ii) implementation of a long-term resource monitoring, 
     computerized data inventory and analysis, and applied 
     research program.
       ``(B) Advisory committee.--In carrying out subparagraph 
     (A)(i), the Secretary shall establish an independent 
     technical advisory committee to review projects, monitoring 
     plans, and habitat and natural resource needs assessments.''.
       (b) Reports.--Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended by 
     striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
       ``(2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2004, and not 
     later than December 31 of every sixth year thereafter, the 
     Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior 
     and the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and 
     Wisconsin, shall submit to Congress a report that--
       ``(A) contains an evaluation of the programs described in 
     paragraph (1);
       ``(B) describes the accomplishments of each of the 
     programs;
       ``(C) provides updates of a systemic habitat needs 
     assessment; and
       ``(D) identifies any needed adjustments in the 
     authorization of the programs.''.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 1103(e) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
     652(e)) is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (3)--
       (A) by striking ``(1)(A)'' and inserting ``(1)(A)(i)''; and
       (B) by striking ``Secretary not to exceed'' and all that 
     follows before the period at the end and inserting 
     ``Secretary $22,750,000 for fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal 
     year thereafter'';
       (2) in paragraph (4)--
       (A) by striking ``(1)(B)'' and inserting ``(1)(A)(ii)''; 
     and
       (B) by striking ``Secretary not to exceed'' and all that 
     follows before the period at the end and inserting 
     ``Secretary $10,420,000 for fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal 
     year thereafter''; and
       (3) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:
       ``(5) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1)(A)(i) $350,000 
     for each of fiscal years 1999 through 2009.''.
       (d) Transfer of Amounts.--Section 1103(e) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is 
     amended by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(6) Transfer of amounts.--For fiscal year 1999 and each 
     fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with 
     the Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, 
     Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, may transfer not to 
     exceed 20 percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out 
     clause (i) or (ii) of paragraph (1)(A) to the amounts 
     appropriated to carry out the other of those clauses.''.
       (e) Cost Sharing.--Section 1103(e)(7)(A) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(7)(A)) is 
     amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
     following: ``and, in the case of any project requiring non-
     Federal cost sharing, the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     the project shall be 35 percent''.
       (f) Habitat Needs Assessment.--Section 1103(h)(2) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(h)(2)) 
     is amended--
       (1) by striking ``(2) The Secretary'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(2) Determination.--
       ``(A) In general.--The Secretary''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(B) Requirements.--The Secretary shall--
       ``(i) complete the ongoing habitat needs assessment 
     conducted under this paragraph not later than September 30, 
     2000; and
       ``(ii) include in each report under subsection (e)(2) the 
     most recent habitat needs assessment conducted under this 
     paragraph.''.
       (g) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1103 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652) is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (e)(7)--
       (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``(1)(A)'' and 
     inserting ``(1)(A)(i)''; and
       (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``paragraphs (1)(B) 
     and (1)(C)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)(A)(ii)''; and
       (2) in subsection (f)(2)--
       (A) by striking ``(2)(A)'' and inserting ``(2)''; and
       (B) by striking subparagraph (B).

     SEC. 510. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

       Section 404(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended in the first sentence--
       (1) by striking ``is'' and inserting ``are''; and
       (2) by inserting after ``1997'' the following: ``, and an 
     additional total of $2,500,000 for fiscal years thereafter''.

     SEC. 511. WATER CONTROL MANAGEMENT.

       (a) In General.--In evaluating potential improvements for 
     water control management activities and consolidation of 
     water control management centers, the Secretary may consider 
     a regionalized water control management plan but may not 
     implement such a plan until the date on which a report is 
     submitted under subsection (b).
       (b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary

[[Page 20077]]

     shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the 
     House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works and the Committee on Appropriations of the 
     Senate a report containing--
       (1) a description of the primary objectives of streamlining 
     water control management activities;
       (2) a description of the benefits provided by streamlining 
     water control management activities through consolidation of 
     centers for those activities;
       (3) a determination whether the benefits to users of 
     establishing regional water control management centers will 
     be retained in each district office of the Corps of Engineers 
     that does not have a regional center;
       (4) a determination whether users of regional centers will 
     receive a higher level of benefits from streamlining water 
     control management activities; and
       (5) a list of the members of Congress who represent a 
     district that includes a water control management center that 
     is to be eliminated under a proposed regionalized plan.

     SEC. 512. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

       The Secretary may carry out the following projects under 
     section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (33 U.S.C. 2326):
       (1) Bodega bay, california.--A project to make beneficial 
     use of dredged material from a Federal navigation project in 
     Bodega Bay, California.
       (2) Sabine refuge, louisiana.--A project to make beneficial 
     use of dredged material from Federal navigation projects in 
     the vicinity of Sabine Refuge, Louisiana.
       (3) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--
     A project to make beneficial use of dredged material from a 
     Federal navigation project in Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson 
     Counties, Mississippi.
       (4) Rose city marsh, orange county, texas.--A project to 
     make beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal 
     navigation project in Rose City Marsh, Orange County, Texas.
       (5) Bessie heights marsh, orange county, texas.--A project 
     to make beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal 
     navigation project in Bessie Heights Marsh, Orange County, 
     Texas.

     SEC. 513. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE.

       Section 507 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3758) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and 
     inserting the following:
       ``(2) Expansion and improvement of Long Pine Run Dam, 
     Pennsylvania, and associated water infrastructure, in 
     accordance with subsections (b) through (e) of section 313 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845), 
     at a total cost of $20,000,000.''.

     SEC. 514. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT 
                   PROJECT.

       (a) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Middle mississippi river.--The term ``middle 
     Mississippi River'' means the reach of the Mississippi River 
     from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0, upper 
     Mississippi River) to the mouth of the Missouri River (river 
     mile 195).
       (2) Missouri river.--The term ``Missouri River'' means the 
     main stem and floodplain of the Missouri River (including 
     reservoirs) from its confluence with the Mississippi River at 
     St. Louis, Missouri, to its headwaters near Three Forks, 
     Montana.
       (3) Project.--The term ``project'' means the project 
     authorized by this section.
       (b) Protection and Enhancement Activities.--
       (1) Plan.--
       (A) Development.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a plan for 
     a project to protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat of 
     the Missouri River and the middle Mississippi River.
       (B) Activities.--
       (i) In general.--The plan shall provide for such activities 
     as are necessary to protect and enhance fish and wildlife 
     habitat without adversely affecting--

       (I) the water-related needs of the region surrounding the 
     Missouri River and the middle Mississippi River, including 
     flood control, navigation, recreation, and enhancement of 
     water supply; and
       (II) private property rights.

       (ii) Required activities.--The plan shall include--

       (I) modification and improvement of navigation training 
     structures to protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat;
       (II) modification and creation of side channels to protect 
     and enhance fish and wildlife habitat;
       (III) restoration and creation of island fish and wildlife 
     habitat;
       (IV) creation of riverine fish and wildlife habitat;
       (V) establishment of criteria for prioritizing the type and 
     sequencing of activities based on cost-effectiveness and 
     likelihood of success; and
       (VI) physical and biological monitoring for evaluating the 
     success of the project, to be performed by the River Studies 
     Center of the United States Geological Survey in Columbia, 
     Missouri.

       (2) Implementation of activities.--
       (A) In general.--Using funds made available to carry out 
     this section, the Secretary shall carry out the activities 
     described in the plan.
       (B) Use of existing authority for unconstructed features of 
     the project.--Using funds made available to the Secretary 
     under other law, the Secretary shall design and construct any 
     feature of the project that may be carried out using the 
     authority of the Secretary to modify an authorized project, 
     if the Secretary determines that the design and construction 
     will--
       (i) accelerate the completion of activities to protect and 
     enhance fish and wildlife habitat of the Missouri River or 
     the middle Mississippi River; and
       (ii) be compatible with the project purposes described in 
     this section.
       (c) Integration of Other Activities.--
       (1) In general.--In carrying out the activities described 
     in subsection (b), the Secretary shall integrate the 
     activities with other Federal, State, and tribal activities.
       (2) New authority.--Nothing in this section confers any new 
     regulatory authority on any Federal or non-Federal entity 
     that carries out any activity authorized by this section.
       (d) Public Participation.--In developing and carrying out 
     the plan and the activities described in subsection (b), the 
     Secretary shall provide for public review and comment in 
     accordance with applicable Federal law, including--
       (1) providing advance notice of meetings;
       (2) providing adequate opportunity for public input and 
     comment;
       (3) maintaining appropriate records; and
       (4) compiling a record of the proceedings of meetings.
       (e) Compliance With Applicable Law.--In carrying out the 
     plan and the activities described in subsections (b) and (c), 
     the Secretary shall comply with any applicable Federal law, 
     including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
     U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
       (f) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of the project shall be 35 percent.
       (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 1 
     activity described in subsection (b) shall not exceed 
     $5,000,000.
       (3) Operation and maintenance.--The operation and 
     maintenance of the project shall be a non-Federal 
     responsibility.
       (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to pay the Federal share of the cost of 
     carrying out this section $30,000,000 for the period of 
     fiscal years 2000 and 2001.

     SEC. 515. IRRIGATION DIVERSION PROTECTION AND FISHERIES 
                   ENHANCEMENT ASSISTANCE.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical 
     planning and design assistance to non-Federal interests and 
     may conduct other site-specific studies to formulate and 
     evaluate fish screens, fish passages devices, and other 
     measures to decrease the incidence of juvenile and adult fish 
     inadvertently entering irrigation systems.
       (b) Cooperation.--Measures under subsection (a)--
       (1) shall be developed in cooperation with Federal and 
     State resource agencies; and
       (2) shall not impair the continued withdrawal of water for 
     irrigation purposes.
       (c) Priority.--In providing assistance under subsection 
     (a), the Secretary shall give priority based on--
       (1) the objectives of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
     (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.);
       (2) cost-effectiveness; and
       (3) the potential for reducing fish mortality.
       (d) Non-Federal Share.--
       (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     measures under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
       (2) In-kind contributions.--Not more than 50 percent of the 
     non-Federal contribution may be made through the provision of 
     services, materials, supplies, or other in-kind 
     contributions.
       (e) No Construction Activity.--This section does not 
     authorize any construction activity.
       (f) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
     a report on--
       (1) fish mortality caused by irrigation water intake 
     devices;
       (2) appropriate measures to reduce fish mortality;
       (3) the extent to which those measures are currently being 
     employed in arid States;
       (4) the construction costs associated with those measures; 
     and
       (5) the appropriate Federal role, if any, to encourage the 
     use of those measures.

     SEC. 516. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR WATERSHED RESTORATION.

       The Secretary shall examine using, and, if appropriate, 
     encourage the use of, innovative treatment technologies, 
     including membrane technologies, for watershed and 
     environmental restoration and protection projects involving 
     water quality.

     SEC. 517. EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS.

       The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports for 
     the following projects and, if justified, proceed directly to 
     project preconstruction, engineering, and design:
       (1) Sluice Creek, Guilford, Connecticut, and Lighthouse 
     Point Park, New Haven, Connecticut.
       (2) Alafia Channel, Tampa Harbor, Florida, project for 
     navigation.
       (3) Little Calumet River, Indiana.
       (4) Ohio River Greenway, Indiana, project for environmental 
     restoration and recreation.

[[Page 20078]]

       (5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, 
     project for waterfront and riverine preservation, 
     restoration, and enhancement modifications.
       (6) Extension of locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on the upper 
     Mississippi River and the La Grange and Peoria locks on the 
     Illinois River, project to provide lock chambers 110 feet in 
     width and 1,200 feet in length.

     SEC. 518. DOG RIVER, ALABAMA.

       The Secretary shall provide $1,500,000 for environmental 
     restoration for a pilot project, in cooperation with non-
     Federal interests, to restore natural water depths in the Dog 
     River, Alabama.

     SEC. 519. LEVEES IN ELBA AND GENEVA, ALABAMA.

       (a) Elba, Alabama.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and rehabilitate 
     a levee in the city of Elba, Alabama, at a total cost of 
     $12,900,000.
       (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     repair and rehabilitation under paragraph (1) shall be 35 
     percent.
       (b) Geneva, Alabama.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and rehabilitate 
     a levee in the city of Geneva, Alabama, at a total cost of 
     $16,600,000.
       (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     repair and rehabilitation under paragraph (1) shall be 35 
     percent.

     SEC. 520. NAVAJO RESERVATION, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH.

       (a) In General.--In cooperation with other appropriate 
     Federal and local agencies, the Secretary shall undertake a 
     survey of, and provide technical, planning, and design 
     assistance for, watershed management, restoration, and 
     development on the Navajo Indian Reservation, Arizona, New 
     Mexico, and Utah.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     activities carried out under this section shall be 75 
     percent. Funds made available under the Indian Self-
     Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et 
     seq.) may be used by the Navajo Nation in meeting the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the activities.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

     SEC. 521. BEAVER LAKE, ARKANSAS, WATER SUPPLY STORAGE 
                   REALLOCATION.

       The Secretary shall reallocate approximately 31,000 
     additional acre-feet at Beaver Lake, Arkansas, to water 
     supply storage at no cost to the Beaver Water District or the 
     Carroll-Boone Water District, except that at no time shall 
     the bottom of the conservation pool be at an elevation that 
     is less than 1,076 feet, NGVD.

     SEC. 522. BEAVER LAKE TROUT PRODUCTION FACILITY, ARKANSAS.

       Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this 
     Act, the Secretary, in conjunction with the State of 
     Arkansas, shall prepare a plan for the mitigation of effects 
     of the Beaver Dam project on Beaver Lake, including the 
     benefits of and schedule for construction of the Beaver Lake 
     trout production facility and related facilities.

     SEC. 523. CHINO DAIRY PRESERVE, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary, in coordination 
     with the heads of other Federal agencies, shall provide 
     technical assistance to State and local agencies in the 
     study, design, and implementation of measures for flood 
     damage reduction and environmental restoration and protection 
     in the Santa Ana River watershed, California, with particular 
     emphasis on structural and nonstructural measures in the 
     vicinity of the Chino Dairy Preserve.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     activities assisted under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
       (c) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
     feasibility study to determine the most cost-effective plan 
     for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration and 
     protection in the vicinity of the Chino Dairy Preserve, Santa 
     Ana River watershed, Orange County and San Bernardino County, 
     California.

     SEC. 524. ORANGE AND SAN DIEGO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with local 
     governments, may prepare special area management plans for 
     Orange and San Diego Counties, California, to demonstrate the 
     effectiveness of using the plans to provide information 
     regarding aquatic resources.
       (b) Use of Plans.--The Secretary may--
       (1) use plans described in subsection (a) in making 
     regulatory decisions; and
       (2) issue permits consistent with the plans.

     SEC. 525. RUSH CREEK, NOVATO, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood control 
     under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
     701s) at Rush Creek, Novato, California, if the Secretary 
     determines that the project is technically sound, 
     environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.

     SEC. 526. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary may--
       (1) modify the cooperative agreement with the Santa Cruz 
     Port District, California, to reflect unanticipated 
     additional dredging effort; and
       (2) extend the agreement for 10 years.

     SEC. 527. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

       (a) Computer Model.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may apply the computer model 
     developed under the St. Johns River basin feasibility study 
     to assist non-Federal interests in developing strategies for 
     improving water quality in the Lower St. Johns River basin, 
     Florida.
       (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     activities assisted under paragraph (1) shall be 50 percent.
       (b) Topographic Survey.--The Secretary may provide 1-foot 
     contour topographic survey maps of the Lower St. Johns River 
     basin, Florida, to non-Federal interests for analyzing 
     environmental data and establishing benchmarks for subbasins.

     SEC. 528. MAYO'S BAR LOCK AND DAM, COOSA RIVER, ROME, 
                   GEORGIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical 
     assistance (including planning, engineering, and design 
     assistance) for the reconstruction of the Mayo's Bar Lock and 
     Dam, Coosa River, Rome, Georgia.
       (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of activities assisted under subsection (a) shall be 50 
     percent.

     SEC. 529. COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD IMPACT RESPONSE MODELING 
                   SYSTEM, CORALVILLE RESERVOIR AND IOWA RIVER 
                   WATERSHED, IOWA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     University of Iowa, shall conduct a study and develop a 
     comprehensive flood impact response modeling system for 
     Coralville Reservoir and the Iowa River watershed, Iowa.
       (b) Study.--The study shall include--
       (1) an evaluation of the combined hydrologic, geomorphic, 
     environmental, economic, social, and recreational impacts of 
     operating strategies within the watershed;
       (2) creation of an integrated, dynamic flood impact model; 
     and
       (3) the development of a rapid response system to be used 
     during flood and emergency situations.
       (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 5 years after the 
     date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a 
     report to Congress on the results of the study and modeling 
     system and such recommendations as the Secretary determines 
     to be appropriate.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

     SEC. 530. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE IN ILLINOIS.

       The Secretary may carry out the project for Georgetown, 
     Illinois, and the project for Olney, Illinois, referred to in 
     House Report Number 104-741, accompanying the Safe Drinking 
     Water Act Amendments of 1996 (Public Law 104-182).

     SEC. 531. KANOPOLIS LAKE, KANSAS.

       (a) Water Storage.--The Secretary shall offer to the State 
     of Kansas the right to purchase water storage in Kanapolis 
     Lake, Kansas, at the average of--
       (1) the cost calculated in accordance with the terms of the 
     memorandum of understanding entitled ``Memorandum of 
     Understanding Between the State of Kansas and the U.S. 
     Department of the Army Concerning the Purchase of Municipal 
     and Industrial Water Supply Storage'', dated December 11, 
     1985; and
       (2) the cost calculated in accordance with procedures 
     established as of the date of enactment of this Act by the 
     Secretary to determine the cost of water storage at other 
     projects under the Secretary's jurisdiction.
       (b) Effective Date.--For the purposes of this section, the 
     effective date of the memorandum of understanding referred to 
     in subsection (a)(1) shall be deemed to be the date of 
     enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 532. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

       Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3773) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (b)--
       (A) by striking ``and surface'' and inserting ``surface''; 
     and
       (B) by striking ``development.'' and inserting 
     ``development, and small stream flooding, local storm water 
     drainage, and related problems.'';
       (2) in subsection (d)(1), by adding at the end the 
     following: ``Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
     undertaken under this section, with the consent of the 
     affected local government, a non-Federal interest may include 
     a nonprofit entity.''; and
       (3) in subsection (h), by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$25,000,000''.

     SEC. 533. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA.

       Section 533(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3775) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' 
     and inserting ``$250,000,000''.

     SEC. 534. SNUG HARBOR, MARYLAND.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
     Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, may--
       (1) provide technical assistance to the residents of Snug 
     Harbor, in the vicinity of Berlin, Maryland, for the purpose 
     of flood damage reduction;
       (2) conduct a study of a project consisting of 
     nonstructural measures for flood damage reduction in the 
     vicinity of Snug Harbor, Maryland, taking into account the 
     relationship of both the Ocean City Inlet and Assateague 
     Island to the flooding; and
       (3) after completion of the study, carry out the project 
     under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
     701s).
       (b) FEMA Assistance.--The Director, in coordination with 
     the Secretary and under the authorities of the Robert T. 
     Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
     U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), may provide technical assistance and 
     nonstructural measures for flood damage mitigation in the 
     vicinity of Snug Harbor, Maryland.

[[Page 20079]]

       (c) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     assistance under this section shall not exceed $3,000,000.
       (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of assistance under this section shall be determined in 
     accordance with title I of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.) or the Robert T. 
     Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
     U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as appropriate.

     SEC. 535. WELCH POINT, ELK RIVER, CECIL COUNTY, AND 
                   CHESAPEAKE CITY, MARYLAND.

       (a) Spillage of Dredged Materials.--The Secretary shall 
     carry out a study to determine whether the spillage of 
     dredged materials that were removed as part of the project 
     for navigation, Inland Waterway from Delaware River to 
     Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the 
     first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1030, 
     chapter 831), is a significant impediment to vessels 
     transiting the Elk River near Welch Point, Maryland. If the 
     Secretary determines that the spillage is an impediment to 
     navigation, the Secretary may conduct such dredging as may be 
     required to permit navigation on the river.
       (b) Damage to Water Supply.--The Secretary shall carry out 
     a study to determine whether additional compensation is 
     required to fully compensate the city of Chesapeake, 
     Maryland, for damage to the city's water supply resulting 
     from dredging of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal project. 
     If the Secretary determines that such additional compensation 
     is required, the Secretary may provide the compensation to 
     the city of Chesapeake.

     SEC. 536. CAPE COD CANAL RAILROAD BRIDGE, BUZZARDS BAY, 
                   MASSACHUSETTS.

       (a) Alternative Transportation.--The Secretary may provide 
     up to $300,000 for meeting the need for alternative 
     transportation that may arise as a result of the operation, 
     maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of the Cape Cod Canal 
     Railroad Bridge.
       (b) Operation and Maintenance Contract Renegotiation.--Not 
     later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
     the Secretary shall enter into negotiation with the owner of 
     the railroad right-of-way for the Cape Cod Canal Railroad 
     Bridge for the purpose of establishing the rights and 
     responsibilities for the operation and maintenance of the 
     Bridge. The Secretary may include in any new contract the 
     termination of the prior contract numbered ER-W175-ENG-1.

     SEC. 537. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

       (a) Demonstration Project.--The Secretary, in consultation 
     with local officials, shall conduct a demonstration project 
     to improve water quality in the vicinity of St. Louis, 
     Missouri.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $1,700,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 538. BEAVER BRANCH OF BIG TIMBER CREEK, NEW JERSEY.

       At the request of the State of New Jersey or a political 
     subdivision of the State, using authority under law in effect 
     on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary may--
       (1) compile and disseminate information on floods and flood 
     damage, including identification of areas subject to 
     inundation by floods; and
       (2) provide technical assistance regarding floodplain 
     management for the Beaver Branch of Big Timber Creek, New 
     Jersey.

     SEC. 539. LAKE ONTARIO AND ST. LAWRENCE RIVER WATER LEVELS, 
                   NEW YORK.

       On request, the Secretary may provide technical assistance 
     to the International Joint Commission and the St. Lawrence 
     River Board of Control in undertaking studies on the effects 
     of fluctuating water levels on the natural environment, 
     recreational boating, property flooding, and erosion along 
     the shorelines of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River in 
     New York. The Commission and the Board are encouraged to 
     conduct such studies in a comprehensive and thorough manner 
     before implementing any change to Water Regulation Plan 1958-
     D.

     SEC. 540. NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NEW YORK AND NEW 
                   JERSEY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     analyze the economic and environmental benefits and costs of 
     potential sediment management and contaminant reduction 
     measures.
       (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In conducting the study, the 
     Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with non-
     Federal interests to investigate, develop, and support 
     measures for sediment management and reduction of sources of 
     contaminant that affect navigation in the Port of New York-
     New Jersey and the environmental conditions of the New York-
     New Jersey Harbor estuary.

     SEC. 541. SEA GATE REACH, CONEY ISLAND, NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary may construct a project for shoreline 
     protection that includes a beachfill with revetment and T-
     groin for the Sea Gate Reach on Coney Island, New York, as 
     identified in the March 1998 report prepared for the Corps of 
     Engineers, New York District, entitled ``Field Data 
     Gathering, Project Performance Analysis and Design 
     Alternative Solutions to Improve Sandfill Retention'', at a 
     total cost of $9,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $5,850,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,150,000.

     SEC. 542. WOODLAWN, NEW YORK.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide planning, 
     design, and other technical assistance to non-Federal 
     interests for identifying and mitigating sources of 
     contamination at Woodlawn Beach in Woodlawn, New York.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.

     SEC. 543. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, NEW YORK.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for 
     a project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood 
     inundation areas in the State of New York.
       (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall 
     include hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall 
     accurately show the flood inundation of each property by 
     flood risk in the floodplain. The maps shall be produced in a 
     high resolution format and shall be made available to all 
     flood prone areas in the State of New York in an electronic 
     format.
       (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-
     Federal interests for the project shall work with the 
     Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure 
     the validity of the maps developed under the project for 
     flood insurance purposes.
       (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
     Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements 
     with the non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of 
     project costs.
       (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
     project shall be 50 percent.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

     SEC. 544. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OTTAWA COUNTY, 
                   OHIO.

       The Secretary may provide technical assistance for the 
     removal of military ordnance from the Toussaint River, 
     Carroll Township, Ottawa County, Ohio.

     SEC. 545. SARDIS RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall accept from the State 
     of Oklahoma or an agent of the State an amount, determined 
     under subsection (b), as prepayment of 100 percent of the 
     water supply cost obligation of the State under Contract No. 
     DACW56-74-JC-0314 for water supply storage at Sardis 
     Reservoir, Oklahoma.
       (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be paid by the 
     State of Oklahoma under subsection (a) shall be subject to 
     adjustment in accordance with accepted discount purchase 
     methods for Federal Government properties as determined by an 
     independent accounting firm designated by the Director of the 
     Office of Management and Budget. The cost of the 
     determination shall be paid for by the State of Oklahoma or 
     an agent of the State.
       (c) Effect.--Nothing in this section affects any of the 
     rights or obligations of the parties to the contract referred 
     to in subsection (a).

     SEC. 546. SKINNER BUTTE PARK, EUGENE, OREGON.

       (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
     south bank of the Willamette River, in the area of Skinner 
     Butte Park from Ferry Street Bridge to the Valley River 
     footbridge, to determine the feasibility of carrying out a 
     project to stabilize the river bank, and to restore and 
     enhance riverine habitat, using a combination of structural 
     and bioengineering techniques.
       (b) Federal Participation.--If, on completion of the study, 
     the Secretary determines that the project is technically 
     sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
     justified, the Secretary may participate with non-Federal 
     interests in the project.
       (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project shall be 35 percent.
       (d) Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--
       (1) In general.--The non-Federal interest shall provide 
     land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged 
     material disposal areas necessary for construction of the 
     project.
       (2) Credit toward non-federal share.--The value of the 
     land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged 
     material disposal areas provided by the non-Federal interests 
     shall be credited toward the non-Federal share.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

     SEC. 547. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, the Director of the Federal 
     Emergency Management Agency, the Administrator of the 
     Environmental Protection Agency, and the heads of other 
     appropriate Federal agencies shall, using authorities under 
     law in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, assist 
     the State of Oregon in developing and implementing a 
     comprehensive basin-wide strategy in the Willamette River 
     basin, Oregon, for coordinated and integrated management of 
     land and water resources to improve water quality, reduce 
     flood hazards, ensure sustainable economic activity, and 
     restore habitat for native fish and wildlife.
       (b) Technical Assistance, Staff, and Financial Support.--
     The heads of the Federal agencies may provide technical 
     assistance, staff, and financial support for development of 
     the basin-wide management strategy.
       (c) Flexibility.--The heads of the Federal agencies shall 
     exercise flexibility to reduce barriers to efficient and 
     effective implementation of the basin-wide management 
     strategy.

     SEC. 548. BRADFORD AND SULLIVAN COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Secretary may provide assistance for water-related 
     environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
     development projects in Bradford and Sullivan Counties, 
     Pennsylvania, using the funds and authorities provided in 
     title I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
     Act, 1999 (Public Law 105-245), under

[[Page 20080]]

     the heading ``Construction, General'' (112 Stat. 1840) for 
     similar projects in Lackawanna, Lycoming, Susquehanna, 
     Wyoming, Pike, and Monroe Counties, Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 549. ERIE HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Secretary may reimburse the appropriate non-Federal 
     interest not more than $78,366 for architectural and 
     engineering costs incurred in connection with the Erie Harbor 
     basin navigation project, Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 550. POINT MARION LOCK AND DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Point Marion 
     Lock and Dam, borough of Point Marion, Pennsylvania, 
     authorized by section 301(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110), is modified to 
     direct the Secretary, in the operation and maintenance of the 
     project, to mitigate damages to the shoreline, at a total 
     cost of $2,000,000.
       (b) Allocation.--The cost of the mitigation shall be 
     allocated as an operation and maintenance cost of a Federal 
     navigation project.

     SEC. 551. SEVEN POINTS' HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may, at full Federal 
     expense, construct a breakwater at the entrance to Seven 
     Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania.
       (b) Operation and Maintenance Costs.--All operation and 
     maintenance costs associated with the facility constructed 
     under this section shall be the responsibility of the lessee 
     of the marina complex at Seven Points' Harbor.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $850,000.

     SEC. 552. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 566(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3786) is amended by inserting ``environmental 
     restoration,'' after ``water supply and related 
     facilities,''.

     SEC. 553. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA-LACKAWANNA, PENNSYLVANIA, 
                   WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION STUDY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of a comprehensive floodplain 
     management and watershed restoration project for the Upper 
     Susquehanna-Lackawanna Watershed, Pennsylvania.
       (b) Geographic Information System.--In conducting the 
     study, the Secretary shall use a geographic information 
     system.
       (c) Plans.--The study shall formulate plans for 
     comprehensive floodplain management and environmental 
     restoration.
       (d) Credit Toward Non-Federal Share.--Non-Federal interests 
     may receive credit toward the non-Federal share for in-kind 
     services and materials that contribute to the study. The 
     Secretary may credit non-Corps Federal assistance provided to 
     the non-Federal interest toward the non-Federal share of the 
     costs of the study to the maximum extent authorized by law.

     SEC. 554. AGUADILLA HARBOR, PUERTO RICO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether 
     erosion and additional storm damage risks that exist in the 
     vicinity of Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico, are the result of 
     a Federal navigation project. If the Secretary determines 
     that such erosion and additional storm damage risks are the 
     result of the project, the Secretary shall take appropriate 
     measures to mitigate the erosion and storm damage.

     SEC. 555. OAHE DAM TO LAKE SHARPE, SOUTH DAKOTA, STUDY.

       Section 441 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3747) is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a) Investigation.--'' before ``The 
     Secretary''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 1999, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
     the investigation under this section. The report shall 
     include the examination of financing options for regular 
     maintenance and preservation of the lake. The report shall be 
     prepared in coordination and cooperation with the Natural 
     Resources Conservation Service, other Federal agencies, and 
     State and local officials.''.

     SEC. 556. NORTH PADRE ISLAND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION AND 
                   ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROJECT.

       The Secretary is directed to carry out a project for 
     ecosystem restoration and storm damage reduction at North 
     Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, at a total estimated 
     cost of $30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,500,000, 
     if the Secretary determines that the work is technically 
     sound and environmentally acceptable. The Secretary shall 
     make such a determination not later than 270 days after the 
     date of enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 557. NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

       The projects described in the following reports are 
     authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially 
     in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, 
     recommended in the reports, and subject to a favorable report 
     of the Chief of Engineers:
       (1) Parkersburg, west virginia.--Report of the Corps of 
     Engineers entitled ``Parkersburg/Vienna Riverfront Park 
     Feasibility Study'', dated June 1998, at a total cost of 
     $8,400,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,200,000, and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,200,000.
       (2) Weirton, west virginia.--Report of the Corps of 
     Engineers entitled ``Feasibility Master Plan for Weirton Port 
     and Industrial Center, West Virginia Public Port Authority'', 
     dated December 1997, at a total cost of $18,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $9,000,000, and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $9,000,000.
       (3) Erickson/wood county, west virginia.--Report of the 
     Corps of Engineers entitled ``Feasibility Master Plan for 
     Erickson/Wood County Port District, West Virginia Public Port 
     Authority'', dated July 7, 1997, at a total cost of 
     $28,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $14,000,000, 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,000,000.

     SEC. 558. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION.

       Section 8 of the Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702h; 45 
     Stat. 537, chapter 569) (commonly known as the ``Flood 
     Control Act of 1928)''), is amended by striking ``$7,500'' 
     and inserting ``$21,500''.

     SEC. 559. COASTAL AQUATIC HABITAT MANAGEMENT.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with the 
     Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior, the 
     Administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency and the 
     National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, other 
     appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, and affected 
     private entities, in the development of a management strategy 
     to address problems associated with toxic microorganisms and 
     the resulting degradation of ecosystems in the tidal and 
     nontidal wetlands and waters of the United States.
       (b) Assistance.--As part of the management strategy, the 
     Secretary may provide planning, design, and other technical 
     assistance to each participating State in the development and 
     implementation of nonregulatory measures to mitigate 
     environmental problems and restore aquatic resources.
       (c) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     measures undertaken under this section shall not exceed 65 
     percent.
       (d) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $7,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

     SEC. 560. ABANDONED AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE RESTORATION.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, 
     planning, and design assistance to Federal and non-Federal 
     interests for carrying out projects to address water quality 
     problems caused by drainage and related activities from 
     abandoned and inactive noncoal mines.
       (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under 
     subsection (a) may be in support of projects for the purposes 
     of--
       (1) managing drainage from abandoned and inactive noncoal 
     mines;
       (2) restoring and protecting streams, rivers, wetlands, 
     other waterbodies, and riparian areas degraded by drainage 
     from abandoned and inactive noncoal mines; and
       (3) demonstrating management practices and innovative and 
     alternative treatment technologies to minimize or eliminate 
     adverse environmental effects associated with drainage from 
     abandoned and inactive noncoal mines.
       (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of assistance under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent, 
     except that the Federal share with respect to projects 
     located on land owned by the United States shall be 100 
     percent.
       (d) Effect on Authority of Secretary of the Interior.--
     Nothing in this section affects the authority of the 
     Secretary of the Interior under title IV of the Surface 
     Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1231 et 
     seq.).
       (e) Technology Database for Reclamation of Abandoned 
     Mines.--The Secretary may provide assistance to non-Federal 
     and nonprofit entities to develop, manage, and maintain a 
     database of conventional and innovative, cost-effective 
     technologies for reclamation of abandoned and inactive 
     noncoal mine sites. Such assistance shall be provided through 
     the Rehabilitation of Abandoned Mine Sites Program managed by 
     the Sacramento District Office of the Corps of Engineers.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

     SEC. 561. BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE TIRE RUBBER.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall, when appropriate, 
     encourage the beneficial use of waste tire rubber (including 
     crumb rubber and baled tire products) recycled from tires.
       (b) Included Beneficial Uses.--Beneficial uses under 
     subsection (a) may include marine pilings, underwater 
     framing, floating docks with built-in flotation, utility 
     poles, and other uses associated with transportation and 
     infrastructure projects receiving Federal funds.
       (c) Use of Waste Tire Rubber.--The Secretary shall 
     encourage the use, when appropriate, of waste tire rubber 
     (including crumb rubber) in projects described in subsection 
     (b).

     SEC. 562. SITE DESIGNATION.

       Section 102(c)(4) of the Marine Protection, Research, and 
     Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended in 
     the third sentence by striking ``January 1, 2000'' and 
     inserting ``January 1, 2003''.

     SEC. 563. LAND CONVEYANCES.

       (a) Toronto Lake and El Dorado Lake, Kansas.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
     Kansas, by quitclaim deed and without consideration, all 
     right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
     2 parcels of land described in paragraph (2) on which 
     correctional facilities operated by the Kansas Department of 
     Corrections are situated.
       (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
     paragraph (1) are--

[[Page 20081]]

       (A) the parcel located in Butler County, Kansas, adjacent 
     to the El Dorado Lake Project, consisting of approximately 
     32.98 acres; and
       (B) the parcel located in Woodson County, Kansas, adjacent 
     to the Toronto Lake Project, consisting of approximately 
     51.98 acres.
       (3) Conditions.--
       (A) Use of land.--A conveyance of a parcel under paragraph 
     (1) shall be subject to the condition that all right, title, 
     and interest in and to the parcel shall revert to the United 
     States if the parcel is used for a purpose other than that of 
     a correctional facility.
       (B) Costs.--The Secretary may require such additional 
     terms, conditions, reservations, and restrictions in 
     connection with the conveyance as the Secretary determines 
     are necessary to protect the interests of the United States, 
     including a requirement that the State pay all reasonable 
     administrative costs associated with the conveyance.
       (b) Pike County, Missouri.--
       (1) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), at 
     such time as Holnam Inc. conveys all right, title, and 
     interest in and to the parcel of land described in paragraph 
     (2)(A) to the United States, the Secretary shall convey all 
     right, title, and interest in the parcel of land described in 
     paragraph (2)(B) to Holnam Inc.
       (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
     paragraph (1) are the following:
       (A) Non-federal land.--152.45 acres with existing flowage 
     easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, described as a 
     portion of Government Tract Number FM-9 and all of Government 
     Tract Numbers FM-11, FM-10, FM-12, FM-13, and FM-16, owned 
     and administered by Holnam Inc.
       (B) Federal land.--152.61 acres situated in Pike County, 
     Missouri, known as Government Tract Numbers FM-17 and a 
     portion of FM-18, administered by the Corps of Engineers.
       (3) Conditions.--The exchange of land under paragraph (1) 
     shall be subject to the following conditions:
       (A) Deeds.--
       (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of the land described 
     in paragraph (2)(A) to the Secretary shall be by a warranty 
     deed acceptable to the Secretary.
       (ii) Federal land.--The instrument of conveyance used to 
     convey the land described in paragraph (2)(B) to Holnam Inc. 
     shall contain such reservations, terms, and conditions as the 
     Secretary considers necessary to allow the United States to 
     operate and maintain the Mississippi River 9-Foot Navigation 
     Project.
       (B) Removal of improvements.--Holnam Inc. may remove any 
     improvements on the land described in paragraph (2)(A). The 
     Secretary may require Holnam Inc. to remove any improvements 
     on the land described in paragraph (2)(A). In either case, 
     Holnam Inc. shall hold the United States harmless from 
     liability, and the United States shall not incur cost 
     associated with the removal or relocation of any of the 
     improvements.
       (C) Time limit for exchange.--The land exchange under 
     paragraph (1) shall be completed not later than 2 years after 
     the date of enactment of this Act.
       (D) Legal description.--The Secretary shall provide the 
     legal description of the land described in paragraph (2). The 
     legal description shall be used in the instruments of 
     conveyance of the land.
       (E) Administrative costs.--The Secretary shall require 
     Holnam Inc. to pay reasonable administrative costs associated 
     with the exchange.
       (4) Value of properties.--If the appraised fair market 
     value, as determined by the Secretary, of the land conveyed 
     to Holnam Inc. by the Secretary under paragraph (1) exceeds 
     the appraised fair market value, as determined by the 
     Secretary, of the land conveyed to the United States by 
     Holnam Inc. under paragraph (1), Holnam Inc. shall make a 
     payment equal to the excess in cash or a cash equivalent to 
     the United States.
       (c) Candy Lake Project, Osage County, Oklahoma.--
       (1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
       (A) Fair market value.--The term ``fair market value'' 
     means the amount for which a willing buyer would purchase and 
     a willing seller would sell a parcel of land, as determined 
     by a qualified, independent land appraiser.
       (B) Previous owner of land.--The term ``previous owner of 
     land'' means a person (including a corporation) that 
     conveyed, or a descendant of a deceased individual who 
     conveyed, land to the Corps of Engineers for use in the Candy 
     Lake project in Osage County, Oklahoma.
       (2) Conveyances.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary shall convey all right, 
     title, and interest of the United States in and to the land 
     acquired by the United States for the Candy Lake project in 
     Osage County, Oklahoma.
       (B) Previous owners of land.--
       (i) In general.--The Secretary shall give a previous owner 
     of land the first option to purchase the land described in 
     subparagraph (A).
       (ii) Application.--

       (I) In general.--A previous owner of land that desires to 
     purchase the land described in paragraph (1) that was owned 
     by the previous owner of land, or by the individual from whom 
     the previous owner of land is descended, shall file an 
     application to purchase the land with the Secretary not later 
     than 180 days after the official date of notice to the 
     previous owner of land under paragraph (3).
       (II) First to file has first option.--If more than 1 
     application is filed to purchase a parcel of land described 
     in subparagraph (A), the first option to purchase the parcel 
     of land shall be determined in the order in which 
     applications for the parcel of land were filed.

       (iii) Identification of previous owners of land.--As soon 
     as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
     Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, identify each 
     previous owner of land.
       (iv) Consideration.--Consideration for land conveyed under 
     this subsection shall be the fair market value of the land.
       (C) Disposal.--Any land described in subparagraph (A) for 
     which an application to purchase the land has not been filed 
     under subparagraph (B)(ii) within the applicable time period 
     shall be disposed of in accordance with law.
       (D) Extinguishment of easements.--All flowage easements 
     acquired by the United States for use in the Candy Lake 
     project in Osage County, Oklahoma, are extinguished.
       (3) Notice.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary shall notify--
       (i) each person identified as a previous owner of land 
     under paragraph (2)(B)(iii), not later than 90 days after 
     identification, by United States mail; and
       (ii) the general public, not later than 90 days after the 
     date of enactment of this Act, by publication in the Federal 
     Register.
       (B) Contents of notice.--Notice under this paragraph shall 
     include--
       (i) a copy of this subsection;
       (ii) information sufficient to separately identify each 
     parcel of land subject to this subsection; and
       (iii) specification of the fair market value of each parcel 
     of land subject to this subsection.
       (C) Official date of notice.--The official date of notice 
     under this subsection shall be the later of--
       (i) the date on which actual notice is mailed; or
       (ii) the date of publication of the notice in the Federal 
     Register.
       (d) Lake Hugo, Oklahoma, Area Land Conveyance.--
       (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey at fair 
     market value to Choctaw County Industrial Authority, 
     Oklahoma, the parcels of land described in paragraph (2).
       (2) Land description.--
       (A) In general.--The parcel of land to be conveyed under 
     paragraph (1) is the parcel lying above elevation 445.2 feet 
     (NGVD) located in the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ and the S\1/2\SW\1/
     4\ of Section 13 and the N\1/2\NW\1/4\ of Section 24, T 6 S, 
     R 18 E, of the Indian Meridian, in Choctaw County, Oklahoma, 
     the parcel also being part of the Sawyer Bluff Public Use 
     Area and including parts of Hugo Lake Tracts 134 and 139, and 
     more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 
     on the east line of Section 13, the point being 100.00 feet 
     north of the southeast corner of S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of 
     Section 13; thence S 01 deg. 36' 24" 100.00 to a Corps of 
     Engineers brass-capped monument at the southeast corner of 
     S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13; thence S 88 deg. 16' 57" 
     W, along the south line of the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 
     13, 2649.493 feet, more or less, to a Corps of Engineers 
     brass-capped monument on the centerline of Section 13; thence 
     S 01 deg. 20' 53" E, along the centerline of Section 13, 
     1316.632 feet to a Corps of Engineers brass-capped monument; 
     thence S 00 deg. 41' 35" E, along the centerline of Section 
     24, 1000.00 feet, more or a less, to a point lying 50.00 feet 
     north and 300.00 feet, more or less, east of Road B of the 
     Sawyer Bluff Public Use Area; thence westerly and 
     northwesterly, parallel to Road B, to the approximate 
     location of the 445.2-foot contour; thence meandering 
     northerly along the 445.2-foot contour to a point 
     approximately 100.00 feet west and 100.00 feet north of the 
     southwest corner of the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13; 
     thence east, paralleling the south line of the S\1/2\N\1/
     2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13, 2649.493 feet, more or less, to the 
     point of beginning.
       (B) Survey.--The exact description and acreage of the 
     parcel shall be determined by a metes and bounds survey 
     provided by the Choctaw County Industrial Authority.
       (e) Conveyance of Property in Marshall County, Oklahoma.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
     Oklahoma all right, title, and interest of the United States 
     in and to real property located in Marshall County, Oklahoma, 
     and included in the Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), Oklahoma and 
     Texas, project, consisting of approximately 1,580 acres and 
     leased to the State of Oklahoma for public park and 
     recreation purposes.
       (2) Consideration.--Consideration for the conveyance under 
     paragraph (1) shall be the fair market value of the real 
     property, as determined by the Secretary. All costs 
     associated with the conveyance under paragraph (1) shall be 
     paid by the State of Oklahoma.
       (3) Description.--The exact acreage and legal description 
     of the real property to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall 
     be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The 
     cost of the survey shall be paid by the State of Oklahoma.
       (4) Environmental compliance.--Before making the conveyance 
     under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
       (A) conduct an environmental baseline survey to determine 
     whether there are levels of contamination for which the 
     United States would be responsible under the Comprehensive 
     Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 
     1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.); and
       (B) ensure that the conveyance complies with the National 
     Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

[[Page 20082]]

       (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under 
     paragraph (1) shall be subject to such other terms and 
     conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
     the interests of the United States, including reservation by 
     the United States of a flowage easement over all portions of 
     the real property to be conveyed that are at or below 
     elevation 645.0 NGVD.
       (f) Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma.--
       (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transfer to the 
     Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma, all right, title, 
     and interest of the United States in and to the land 
     described in paragraph (3) for use as a cemetery.
       (2) Reversion.--If the land to be transferred under this 
     subsection ever ceases to be used as a not-for-profit 
     cemetery or for another public purpose, the land shall revert 
     to the United States.
       (3) Description.--The land to be conveyed under this 
     subsection is the approximately 10 acres of land located in 
     Leflore County, Oklahoma, and described as follows:


                         indian basin meridian

              Section 23, Township 5 North, Range 23 East

       SW SE SW NW
       NW NE NW SW
       N\1/2\ SW SW NW.
       (4) Consideration.--The conveyance under this subsection 
     shall be without consideration. All costs associated with the 
     conveyance shall be paid by the Summerfield Cemetery 
     Association, Oklahoma.
       (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under this 
     subsection shall be subject to such other terms and 
     conditions as the Secretary considers necessary to protect 
     the interests of the United States.
       (g) Dexter, Oregon.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Dexter 
     Sanitary District all right, title, and interest of the 
     United States in and to a parcel of land consisting of 
     approximately 5 acres located at Dexter Lake, Oregon, under 
     lease to the Dexter Sanitary District.
       (2) Consideration.--Land to be conveyed under this 
     subsection shall be conveyed without consideration. If the 
     land is no longer held in public ownership or no longer used 
     for wastewater treatment purposes, title to the land shall 
     revert to the Secretary.
       (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance by the United 
     States shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the 
     Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
     the United States.
       (4) Surveys.--The exact acreage and description of the land 
     to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be determined by 
     such surveys as the Secretary considers necessary. The cost 
     of the surveys shall be borne by the Dexter Sanitary 
     District.
       (h) Charleston, South Carolina.--The Secretary may convey 
     the property of the Corps of Engineers known as the 
     ``Equipment and Storage Yard'', located on Meeting Street in 
     Charleston, South Carolina, in as-is condition for fair 
     market value, with all proceeds from the conveyance to be 
     applied by the Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, to 
     offset a portion of the costs of moving or leasing an office 
     facility in the city of Charleston, South Carolina.
       (i) Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina.--
       (1) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in this 
     subsection, the Secretary shall convey to the State of South 
     Carolina all right, title, and interest of the United States 
     in and to the parcels of land described in paragraph (2)(A) 
     that are being managed, as of the date of enactment of this 
     Act, by the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources 
     for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes for the Richard B. 
     Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina, project authorized by 
     section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420) 
     and modified by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4140).
       (2) Land description.--
       (A) In general.--The parcels of land to be conveyed are 
     described in Exhibits A, F, and H of Army Lease No. DACW21-1-
     93-0910 and associated supplemental agreements or are 
     designated in red in Exhibit A of Army License No. DACW21-3-
     85-1904, excluding all designated parcels in the license that 
     are below elevation 346 feet mean sea level or that are less 
     than 300 feet measured horizontally from the top of the power 
     pool.
       (B) Management of excluded parcels.--Management of the 
     excluded parcels shall continue in accordance with the terms 
     of Army License No. DACW21-3-85-1904 until the Secretary and 
     the State enter into an agreement under paragraph (6).
       (C) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal description of the 
     land shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 
     Secretary, with the cost of the survey borne by the State.
       (3) Costs of conveyance.--The State shall be responsible 
     for all costs, including real estate transaction and 
     environmental compliance costs, associated with the 
     conveyance.
       (4) Perpetual status.--
       (A) In general.--All land conveyed under this subsection 
     shall be retained in public ownership and shall be managed in 
     perpetuity for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in 
     accordance with a plan approved by the Secretary.
       (B) Reversion.--If any parcel of land is not managed for 
     fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in accordance with the 
     plan, title to the parcel shall revert to the United States.
       (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
     require such additional terms and conditions in connection 
     with the conveyance under this subsection as the Secretary 
     considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United 
     States.
       (6) Fish and wildlife mitigation agreement.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary may pay the State of South 
     Carolina not more than $4,850,000, subject to the Secretary 
     and the State entering into a binding agreement for the State 
     to manage for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in 
     perpetuity the parcels of land conveyed under this subsection 
     and excluded parcels designated in Exhibit A of Army License 
     No. DACW21-3-85-1904.
       (B) Failure of performance.--The agreement shall specify 
     the terms and conditions under which payment will be made and 
     the rights of, and remedies available to, the Federal 
     Government to recover all or a portion of the payment if the 
     State fails to manage any parcel in a manner satisfactory to 
     the Secretary.
       (j) Clarkston, Washington.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Port of 
     Clarkston, Washington, all right, title, and interest of the 
     United States in and to a portion of the land described in 
     the Department of the Army lease No. DACW68-1-97-22, 
     consisting of approximately 31 acres, the exact boundaries of 
     which shall be determined by the Secretary and the Port of 
     Clarkston.
       (2) Additional land.--The Secretary may convey to the Port 
     of Clarkston, Washington, such additional land located in the 
     vicinity of Clarkston, Washington, as the Secretary 
     determines to be excess to the needs of the Columbia River 
     Project and appropriate for conveyance.
       (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyances made under 
     paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be subject to such terms and 
     conditions as the Secretary considers necessary to protect 
     the interests of the United States, including a requirement 
     that the Port of Clarkston pay all administrative costs 
     associated with the conveyances, including the cost of land 
     surveys and appraisals and costs associated with compliance 
     with applicable environmental laws (including regulations).
       (4) Use of land.--The Port of Clarkston shall be required 
     to pay the fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, 
     of any land conveyed under paragraphs (1) and (2) that is not 
     retained in public ownership and used for public park or 
     recreation purposes, except that the Secretary shall have a 
     right of reverter to reclaim possession and title to any such 
     land.
       (k) Matewan, West Virginia.--
       (1) In general.--The United States shall convey by 
     quitclaim deed to the town of Matewan, West Virginia, all 
     right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 4 
     parcels of land that the Secretary determines to be excess to 
     the structural project for flood control constructed by the 
     Corps of Engineers along the Tug Fork River under section 202 
     of the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 
     (94 Stat. 1339).
       (2) Property description.--The parcels of land referred to 
     in paragraph (1) are as follows:
       (A) A certain parcel of land in the State of West Virginia, 
     Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more particularly 
     bounded and described as follows:
       Beginning at a point on the southerly right-of-way line of 
     a 40-foot-wide street right-of-way (known as McCoy Alley), 
     having an approximate coordinate value of N228,695, 
     E1,662,397, in the line common to the land designated as 
     U.S.A. Tract No. 834, and the land designated as U.S.A. Tract 
     No. 837, said point being South 51 deg.52' East 81.8 feet 
     from an iron pin and cap marked M-12 on the boundary of the 
     Matewan Area Structural Project, on the north right-of-way 
     line of said street, at a corner common to designated U.S.A. 
     Tracts Nos. 834 and 836; thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
     said street, with the line common to the land of said Tract 
     No. 834, and the land of said Tract No. 837.
       South 14 deg.37' West 46 feet to the corner common to the 
     land of said Tract No. 834, and the land of said Tract No. 
     837; thence, leaving the land of said Tract No. 837, severing 
     the lands of said Project.
       South 14 deg.37' West 46 feet.
       South 68 deg.07' East 239 feet.
       North 26 deg.05' East 95 feet to a point on the southerly 
     right-of-way line of said street; thence, with the right-of-
     way of said street, continuing to sever the lands of said 
     Project.
       South 63 deg.55' East 206 feet; thence, leaving the right-
     of-way of said street, continuing to sever the lands of said 
     Project.
       South 26 deg.16' West 63 feet; thence, with a curve to the 
     left having a radius of 70 feet, a delta of 33 deg.58', an 
     arc length of 41 feet, the chord bearing.
       South 09 deg.17' West 41 feet; thence, leaving said curve, 
     continuing to sever the lands of said Project.
       South 07 deg.42' East 31 feet to a point on the right-of-
     way line of the floodwall; thence, with the right-of-way of 
     said floodwall, continuing to sever the lands of said 
     Project.
       South 77 deg.04' West 71 feet.
       North 77 deg.10' West 46 feet.
       North 67 deg.07' West 254 feet.
       North 67 deg.54' West 507 feet.
       North 57 deg.49' West 66 feet to the intersection of the 
     right-of-way line of said floodwall with the southerly right-
     of-way line of said street; thence, leaving the right-of-way 
     of said floodwall and with the southerly right-of-way of said 
     street, continuing to sever the lands of said Project.
       North 83 deg.01' East 171 feet.

[[Page 20083]]

       North 89 deg.42' East 74 feet.
       South 83 deg.39' East 168 feet.
       South 83 deg.38' East 41 feet.
       South 77 deg.26' East 28 feet to the point of beginning, 
     containing 2.59 acres, more or less.
     The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph are 
     referenced to the West Virginia State Plane Coordinate 
     System, South Zone.
       (B) A certain parcel of land in the State of West Virginia, 
     Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more particularly 
     bounded and described as follows:
       Beginning at an iron pin and cap designated Corner No. M2-2 
     on the southerly right-of-way line of the Norfolk and Western 
     Railroad, having an approximate coordinate value of N228,755 
     E1,661,242, and being at the intersection of the right-of-way 
     line of the floodwall with the boundary of the Matewan Area 
     Structural Project; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said 
     floodwall and with said Project boundary, and the southerly 
     right-of-way of said Railroad.
       North 59 deg.45' East 34 feet.
       North 69 deg.50' East 44 feet.
       North 58 deg.11' East 79 feet.
       North 66 deg.13' East 102 feet.
       North 69 deg.43' East 98 feet.
       North 77 deg.39' East 18 feet.
       North 72 deg.39' East 13 feet to a point at the 
     intersection of said Project boundary, and the southerly 
     right-of-way of said Railroad, with the westerly right-of-way 
     line of State Route 49/10; thence, leaving said Project 
     boundary, and the southerly right-of-way of said Railroad, 
     and with the westerly right-of-way of said road.
       South 03 deg.21' East 100 feet to a point at the 
     intersection of the westerly right-of-way of said road with 
     the right-of-way of said floodwall; thence, leaving the 
     right-of-way of said road, and with the right-of-way line of 
     said floodwall.
       South 79 deg.30' West 69 feet.
       South 78 deg.28' West 222 feet.
       South 80 deg.11' West 65 feet.
       North 38 deg.40' West 14 feet to the point of beginning, 
     containing 0.53 acre, more or less.
     The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph are 
     referenced to the West Virginia State Plane Coordinate 
     System, South Zone.
       (C) A certain parcel of land in the State of West Virginia, 
     Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more particularly 
     bounded and described as follows:
       Beginning at a point on the southerly right-of-way line of 
     the Norfolk and Western Railroad, having an approximate 
     coordinate value of N228,936 E1,661,672, and being at the 
     intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of State Route 
     49/10 with the boundary of the Matewan Area Structural 
     Project; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said road, and 
     with said Project boundary, and the southerly right-of-way of 
     said Railroad.
       North 77 deg.49' East 89 feet to an iron pin and cap 
     designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-4.
       North 79 deg.30' East 74 feet to an iron pin and cap 
     designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-5-1; thence, leaving the 
     southerly right-of-way of said Railroad, and continuing with 
     the boundary of said Project.
       South 06 deg.33' East 102 to an iron pipe and cap 
     designated U.S.A. Corner No. M-6-1 on the northerly right-of-
     way line of State Route 49/28; thence, leaving the boundary 
     of said Project, and with the right-of-way of said road, 
     severing the lands of said Project.
       North 80 deg.59' West 171 feet to a point at the 
     intersection of the Northerly right-of-way line of said State 
     Route 49/28 with the easterly right-of-way line of said State 
     Route 49/10; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said State 
     Route 49/28 and with the right-of-way of said State Route 49/
     10.
       North 03 deg.21' West 42 feet to the point of beginning, 
     containing 0.27 acre, more or less.
     The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph are 
     referenced to the West Virginia State Plane Coordinate 
     System, South Zone.
       (D) A certain parcel of land in the State of West Virginia, 
     Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more particularly 
     bounded and described as follows:
       Beginning at a point at the intersection of the easterly 
     right-of-way line of State Route 49/10 with the right-of-way 
     line of the floodwall, having an approximate coordinate value 
     of N228,826 E1,661,679; thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
     said floodwall, and with the right-of-way of said State Route 
     49/10.
       North 03 deg.21' West 23 feet to a point at the 
     intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of said State 
     Route 49/10 with the southerly right-of-way line of State 
     Route 49/28; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said State 
     Route 49/10 and with the right-of-way of said State Route 49/
     28.
       South 80 deg.59' East 168 feet.
       North 82 deg.28' East 45 feet to an iron pin and cap 
     designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-8-1 on the boundary of the 
     Western Area Structural Project; thence, leaving the right-
     of-way of said State Route 49/28, and with said Project 
     boundary.
       South 08 deg.28' East 88 feet to an iron pin and cap 
     designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-9-1 point on the northerly 
     right-of-way line of a street (known as McCoy Alley); thence, 
     leaving said Project boundary and with the northerly right-
     of-way of said street.
       South 83 deg.01' West 38 feet to a point on the right-of-
     way line of said floodwall; thence, leaving the right-of-way 
     of said street, and with the right-of-way of said floodwall.
       North 57 deg.49' West 180 feet.
       South 79 deg.30' West 34 feet to a point of beginning, 
     containing 0.24 acre, more or less.
     The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph are 
     referenced to the West Virginia State Plane Coordinate 
     System, South Zone.
       (l) McNary National Wildlife Refuge.--
       (1) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction.--
     Administrative jurisdiction over the McNary National Wildlife 
     Refuge is transferred from the Secretary to the Secretary of 
     the Interior.
       (2) Land exchange with the port of walla walla, 
     washington.--
       (A) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior may 
     exchange approximately 188 acres of land located south of 
     Highway 12 and comprising a portion of the McNary National 
     Wildlife Refuge for approximately 122 acres of land owned by 
     the Port of Walla Walla, Washington, and located at the 
     confluence of the Snake River and the Columbia River.
       (B) Terms and conditions.--The land exchange under 
     subparagraph (A) shall be carried out in accordance with such 
     terms and conditions as the Secretary of the Interior 
     determines to be necessary to protect the interests of the 
     United States, including a requirement that the Port pay--
       (i) reasonable administrative costs (not to exceed $50,000) 
     associated with the exchange; and
       (ii) any excess (as determined by the Secretary of the 
     Interior) of the fair market value of the parcel conveyed by 
     the Secretary of the Interior over the fair market value of 
     the parcel conveyed by the Port.
       (C) Use of funds.--The Secretary of the Interior may retain 
     any funds received under subparagraph (B)(ii) and, without 
     further Act of appropriation, may use the funds to acquire 
     replacement habitat for the Mid-Columbia River National 
     Wildlife Refuge Complex.
       (3) Management.--The McNary National Wildlife Refuge and 
     land conveyed by the Port of Walla Walla, Washington, under 
     paragraph (2) shall be managed in accordance with applicable 
     laws, including section 120(h) of the Comprehensive 
     Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 
     1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)) and the National Environmental 
     Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

     SEC. 564. MCNARY POOL, WASHINGTON.

       (a) Extinguishment of Reversionary Interests and Use 
     Restrictions.--With respect to each deed listed in subsection 
     (b)--
       (1) the reversionary interests and the use restrictions 
     relating to port or industrial purposes are extinguished;
       (2) the human habitation or other building structure use 
     restriction is extinguished in each area where the elevation 
     is above the standard project flood elevation; and
       (3) the use of fill material to raise low areas above the 
     standard project flood elevation is authorized, except in any 
     low area constituting wetland for which a permit under 
     section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
     U.S.C. 1344) would be required.
       (b) Affected Deeds.--The deeds with the following county 
     auditor's file numbers are referred to in subsection (a):
       (1) Auditor's File Numbers 521608 and 529071 of Benton 
     County, Washington.
       (2) Auditor's File Numbers 262980, 263334, 318437, and 
     404398 of Franklin County, Washington.
       (3) Auditor's File Numbers 411133, 447417, 447418, 462156, 
     563333, and 569593 of Walla Walla County, Washington.
       (4) Auditor's File Number 285215 of Umatilla County, 
     Oregon, executed by the United States.
       (c) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section 
     affects the remaining rights and interests of the Corps of 
     Engineers for authorized project purposes.

     SEC. 565. NAMINGS.

       (a) Francis Bland Floodway Ditch, Arkansas.--
       (1) Designation.--8-Mile Creek in Paragould, Arkansas, 
     shall be known and designated as the ``Francis Bland Floodway 
     Ditch''.
       (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, 
     regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
     States to the creek referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 
     deemed to be a reference to the ``Francis Bland Floodway 
     Ditch''.
       (b) Lawrence Blackwell Memorial Bridge, Arkansas.--
       (1) Designation.--The bridge over lock and dam numbered 4 
     on the Arkansas River, Arkansas, constructed as part of the 
     project for navigation on the Arkansas River and tributaries, 
     shall be known and designated as the ``Lawrence Blackwell 
     Memorial Bridge''.
       (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, 
     regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
     States to the bridge referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 
     deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence Blackwell Memorial 
     Bridge''.
       (c) John H. Chafee National Wildlife Refuge.--Title II of 
     Public Law 100-610 (16 U.S.C. 668dd note; 102 Stat. 3176) is 
     amended--
       (1) in the title heading, by striking ``PETTAQUAMSCUTT 
     COVE'' and inserting ``JOHN H. CHAFEE'';
       (2) in section 201--
       (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and 
     inserting ``; and''; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(5) John H. Chafee has been a steadfast champion for the 
     conservation of fish, wildlife, and natural resources 
     throughout a distinguished career of public service to the 
     people of Rhode Island and the United States.'';
       (3) in section 202, by striking ``Pettaquamscutt Cove'' and 
     inserting ``John H. Chafee''; and
       (4) in section 203(1), by striking ``Pettaquamscutt Cove'' 
     and inserting ``John H. Chafee''.

[[Page 20084]]



     SEC. 566. FOLSOM DAM AND RESERVOIR ADDITIONAL STORAGE AND 
                   ADDITIONAL FLOOD CONTROL STUDIES.

       (a) Folsom Flood Control Studies.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     State of California and local water resources agencies, shall 
     undertake a study of increasing surcharge flood control 
     storage at the Folsom Dam and Reservoir.
       (2) Limitations.--The study of the Folsom Dam and Reservoir 
     undertaken under paragraph (1) shall assume that there is to 
     be no increase in conservation storage at the Folsom 
     Reservoir.
       (3) Report.--Not later than March 1, 2000, the Secretary 
     shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of the 
     study under this subsection.
       (b) American and Sacramento Rivers Flood Control Study.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall undertake a study of 
     all levees on the American River and on the Sacramento River 
     downstream and immediately upstream of the confluence of such 
     Rivers to access opportunities to increase potential flood 
     protection through levee modifications.
       (2) Deadline for completion.--Not later than March 1, 2000, 
     the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
     results of the study undertaken under this subsection.

     SEC. 567. WALLOPS ISLAND, VIRGINIA.

       (a) Emergency Action.--The Secretary shall take emergency 
     action to protect Wallops Island, Virginia, from damaging 
     coastal storms, by improving and extending the existing 
     seawall, replenishing and renourishing the beach, and 
     constructing protective dunes.
       (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary may seek reimbursement 
     from other Federal agencies whose resources are protected by 
     the emergency action taken under subsection (a).
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $8,000,000.

     SEC. 568. DETROIT RIVER, MICHIGAN.

       (a) Greenway Corridor Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
     study to determine the feasibility of a project for shoreline 
     protection, frontal erosion, and associated purposes in the 
     Detroit River shoreline area from the Belle Isle Bridge to 
     the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit, Michigan.
       (b) Potential Modifications.--As part of the study, the 
     Secretary shall review potential project modifications to any 
     Corps of Engineers project within the Detroit River shoreline 
     area.
       (c) Repair and Rehabilitation.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and rehabilitate 
     the seawalls on the Detroit River in Detroit, Michigan, if 
     the Secretary determines that such work is technically sound, 
     environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1) $1,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

     SEC. 569. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.

       (a) Definition of Northeastern Minnesota.--In this section, 
     the term ``northeastern Minnesota'' means the counties of 
     Cook, Lake, St. Louis, Koochiching, Itasca, Cass, Crow Wing, 
     Aitkin, Carlton, Pine, Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Benton, 
     Sherburne, Isanti, and Chisago, Minnesota.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
     Federal interests in northeastern Minnesota.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in northeastern 
     Minnesota, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
     related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
     environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
     protection and development.
       (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
     provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
     the project is publicly owned.
       (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
     into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
     each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in 
     the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
     completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
     local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
     The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
     the total construction costs of the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is 
     the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest 
     incurred in providing the non-Federal share of the project's 
     costs.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project costs (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
     project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
     the pilot program carried out under this section, including 
     recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
     implemented on a national basis.
       (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain 
     available until expended.

     SEC. 570. ALASKA.

       (a) Definition of Native Corporation.--In this section, the 
     term ``Native Corporation'' has the meaning given the term in 
     section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 
     U.S.C. 1602).
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
     Federal interests in Alaska.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in Alaska, including 
     projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, 
     water supply and related facilities, and surface water 
     resource protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirements.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned or is owned by a Native 
     Corporation.
       (e) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
     into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project costs 
     under each local cooperation agreement entered into under 
     this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
     in the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
     completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
     local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
     The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
     the total construction costs of the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project costs (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
     project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a

[[Page 20085]]

     report on the results of the pilot program carried out under 
     this section, including a recommendation concerning whether 
     the program should be implemented on a national basis.
       (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain 
     available until expended.

     SEC. 571. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.

       (a) Definition of Central West Virginia.--In this section, 
     the term ``central West Virginia'' means the counties of 
     Mason, Jackson, Putnam, Kanawha, Roane, Wirt, Calhoun, Clay, 
     Nicholas, Braxton, Gilmer, Lewis, Upshur, Randolph, 
     Pendleton, Hardy, Hampshire, Morgan, Berkeley, and Jefferson, 
     West Virginia.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
     Federal interests in central West Virginia.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in central West Virginia, 
     including projects for wastewater treatment and related 
     facilities, water supply and related facilities, and surface 
     water resource protection and development.
       (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
     provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
     the project is publicly owned.
       (e) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
     into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project costs 
     under each local cooperation agreement entered into under 
     this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
     in the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
     completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
     local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
     The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
     the total construction costs of the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project costs (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
     project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
     the pilot program carried out under this section, including a 
     recommendation concerning whether the program should be 
     implemented on a national basis.
       (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain 
     available until expended.

     SEC. 572. SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AREA WATERSHED RESTORATION, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Limitation.--The Secretary may undertake studies to 
     determine the extent of ground water contamination and the 
     feasibility of prevention and cleanup of such contamination 
     resulting from the acts of a Federal department or agency--
       (1) at or in the vicinity of McClellan Air Force Base, 
     Mather Air Force Base, or Sacramento Army Depot, California; 
     or
       (2) at any place in the Sacramento metropolitan area 
     watershed where the Federal Government would be a responsible 
     party under any Federal environmental law.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

     SEC. 573. ONONDAGA LAKE, NEW YORK.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall--
       (1) plan, design, and construct projects that are 
     consistent with the Onondaga Lake Management Plan and comply 
     with the amended consent judgment and the project labor 
     agreement for the environmental restoration, conservation, 
     and management of Onondaga Lake, New York; and
       (2) provide, in coordination with the Administrator of the 
     Environmental Protection Agency, financial assistance, 
     including grants to the State of New York and political 
     subdivisions of the State, for the development and 
     implementation of projects to restore, conserve, and manage 
     the lake.
       (b) Partnership.--
       (1) In general.--In carrying out this section, the 
     Secretary shall establish and lead a partnership with 
     appropriate Federal agencies (including the Environmental 
     Protection Agency) and the State of New York and political 
     subdivisions of the State for the purpose of development and 
     implementation of the projects.
       (2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
       (A) In general.--The partnership shall coordinate the 
     actions taken under this section with actions to restore and 
     conserve Onondaga Lake taken under other provisions of 
     Federal or State law.
       (B) No effect on other law.--Except as provided in 
     subsection (g), this section does not alter, modify, or 
     affect any other provision of Federal or State law.
       (3) Termination.--Unless the Secretary and the Governor of 
     the State of New York agree otherwise, the partnership 
     established under this subsection shall terminate not later 
     than the date that is 15 years after the date of enactment of 
     this Act.
       (c) Revisions to the Onondaga Lake Management Plan.--
       (1) In general.--In consultation with the partnership 
     established under subsection (b) and after providing for 
     public review and comment, the Secretary and the 
     Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall 
     approve revisions to the Onondaga Lake Management Plan if the 
     Governor of the State of New York concurs in the approval.
       (2) No effect on modification of amended consent 
     judgment.--Paragraph (1) has no effect on the conditions 
     under which the amended consent judgment referred to in 
     subsection (a)(1) may be modified.
       (d) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of a project constructed under subsection (a) shall be not 
     less than 30 percent of the total cost of the project and may 
     be provided through the provision of in-kind services.
       (2) Administration and management.--The Secretary's 
     administration and management of the project shall be at full 
     Federal expense.
       (e) No Effect on Liability.--The provision of financial 
     assistance under this section shall not relieve from 
     liability any person that would otherwise be liable under 
     Federal or State law for damages, response costs, natural 
     resource damages, restitution, equitable relief, or any other 
     relief.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
       (g) Repeal.--Title IV of the Great Lakes Critical Programs 
     Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 3010) and section 411 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4648) are 
     repealed effective on the date that is 1 year after the date 
     of enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 574. EAST LYNN LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA.

       The Secretary shall defer any decision relating to the 
     leasing of mineral resources underlying East Lynn Lake, West 
     Virginia, project lands to the Federal entity vested with 
     such leasing authority.

     SEC. 575. EEL RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine whether flooding in the city of Ferndale, 
     California, is the result of the Federal flood control 
     project on the Eel River.
       (b) Mitigation Measures.--If the Secretary determines that 
     the flooding is the result of the project, the Secretary 
     shall take appropriate measures (including dredging of the 
     Salt River and construction of sediment ponds at the 
     confluence of Francis, Reas, and Williams Creeks) to mitigate 
     the flooding.

     SEC. 576. NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.

       The Secretary--
       (1) shall review a report prepared by the non-Federal 
     interest concerning flood protection for the Dark Hollow area 
     of North Little Rock, Arkansas; and
       (2) if the Secretary determines that the report meets the 
     evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers and 
     that the project is economically justified, technically 
     sound, and environmentally acceptable, may carry out the 
     project.

     SEC. 577. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSISSIPPI PLACE, ST. 
                   PAUL, MINNESOTA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may enter into a cooperative 
     agreement to participate in a project for the planning, 
     design, and construction of infrastructure and other 
     improvements at Mississippi Place, St. Paul, Minnesota.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
     project shall be 50 percent. The Federal share may be 
     provided in the form of grants or reimbursements of project 
     costs.
       (2) Credit for non-federal work.--The non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit toward

[[Page 20086]]

     the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
     reasonable costs incurred by the non-Federal interest as a 
     result of participation in the planning, design, and 
     construction of the project.
       (3) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit toward the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of the project for land, easements, rights-
     of-way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal interest 
     with respect to the project.
       (4) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for the project shall be 100 
     percent.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 578. DREDGING OF SALT PONDS IN THE STATE OF RHODE 
                   ISLAND.

       The Secretary may acquire for the State of Rhode Island a 
     dredge and associated equipment with the capacity to dredge 
     approximately 100 cubic yards per hour for use by the State 
     in dredging salt ponds in the State.

     SEC. 579. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW 
                   YORK.

       Section 567(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3787) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(3) The Chemung River watershed, New York, at an 
     estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000.''.

     SEC. 580. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND, FLOOD PROJECT MITIGATION.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood control and other 
     purposes, Cumberland, Maryland, authorized by section 5 of 
     the Act of June 22, 1936 (commonly known as the ``Flood 
     Control Act of 1936'') (49 Stat. 1574, chapter 688), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake, as a 
     separate part of the project, restoration of the historic 
     Chesapeake and Ohio Canal substantially in accordance with 
     the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historic Park, 
     Cumberland, Maryland, Rewatering Design Analysis, dated 
     February 1998, at a total cost of $15,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $9,750,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $5,250,000.
       (b) In-Kind Services.--The non-Federal interest for the 
     restoration project under subsection (a)--
       (1) may provide all or a portion of the non-Federal share 
     of project costs in the form of in-kind services; and
       (2) shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of 
     project costs for design and construction work performed by 
     the non-Federal interest before execution of a project 
     cooperation agreement and for land, easements, and rights-of-
     way required for the restoration and acquired by the non-
     Federal interest before execution of such an agreement.
       (c) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation and 
     maintenance of the restoration project under subsection (a) 
     shall be the full responsibility of the National Park 
     Service.

     SEC. 581. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA.

       Section 5(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 
     U.S.C. 426h), is amended by inserting before the semicolon 
     the following: ``, including the city of Miami Beach, 
     Florida''.

     SEC. 582. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND 
                   SNAKE RIVERS SALMON SURVIVAL.

       Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (16 U.S.C. 3301 note; Public Law 104-303) is amended by 
     striking subsection (a) and all that follows and inserting 
     the following:
       ``(a) Salmon Survival Activities.--
       ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of 
     Commerce and Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary shall 
     accelerate ongoing research and development activities, and 
     may carry out or participate in additional research and 
     development activities, for the purpose of developing 
     innovative methods and technologies for improving the 
     survival of salmon, especially salmon in the Columbia/Snake 
     River Basin.
       ``(2) Accelerated activities.--Accelerated research and 
     development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may 
     include research and development related to--
       ``(A) impacts from water resources projects and other 
     impacts on salmon life cycles;
       ``(B) juvenile and adult salmon passage;
       ``(C) light and sound guidance systems;
       ``(D) surface-oriented collector systems;
       ``(E) transportation mechanisms; and
       ``(F) dissolved gas monitoring and abatement.
       ``(3) Additional activities.--Additional research and 
     development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may 
     include research and development related to--
       ``(A) studies of juvenile salmon survival in spawning and 
     rearing areas;
       ``(B) estuary and near-ocean juvenile and adult salmon 
     survival;
       ``(C) impacts on salmon life cycles from sources other than 
     water resources projects;
       ``(D) cryopreservation of fish gametes and formation of a 
     germ plasma repository for threatened and endangered 
     populations of native fish; and
       ``(E) other innovative technologies and actions intended to 
     improve fish survival, including the survival of resident 
     fish.
       ``(4) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate any 
     activities carried out under this subsection with appropriate 
     Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian tribes, 
     and the Northwest Power Planning Council.
       ``(5) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
     enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the research 
     and development activities carried out under this subsection, 
     including any recommendations of the Secretary concerning the 
     research and development activities.
       ``(6) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out research and 
     development activities under paragraph (3).
       ``(b) Advanced Turbine Development.--
       ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of 
     Energy, the Secretary shall accelerate efforts toward 
     developing and installing in Corps of Engineers-operated dams 
     innovative, efficient, and environmentally safe hydropower 
     turbines, including design of fish-friendly turbines, for use 
     on the Columbia/Snake River hydrosystem.
       ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $35,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
       ``(c) Management of Predation on Columbia/Snake River 
     System Native Fishes.--
       ``(1) Nesting avian predators.--In conjunction with the 
     Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the Interior, and 
     consistent with a management plan to be developed by the 
     United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Secretary shall 
     carry out methods to reduce nesting populations of avian 
     predators on dredge spoil islands in the Columbia River under 
     the jurisdiction of the Secretary.
       ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out research and 
     development activities under this subsection.
       ``(d) Implementation.--Nothing in this section affects the 
     authority of the Secretary to implement the results of the 
     research and development carried out under this section or 
     any other law.''.

     SEC. 583. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall work with the Secretary of 
     Transportation on a proposed solution to carry out the 
     project to maintain the Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, 
     California, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148).

     SEC. 584. HOLES CREEK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, OHIO.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     law, the non-Federal share of project costs for the project 
     for flood control, Holes Creek, Ohio, shall not exceed the 
     sum of--
       (1) the total amount projected as the non-Federal share as 
     of September 30, 1996, in the Project Cooperation Agreement 
     executed on that date; and
       (2) 100 percent of the amount of any increases in the cost 
     of the locally preferred plan over the cost estimated in the 
     Project Cooperation Agreement.
       (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
     Federal interest any amount paid by the non-Federal interest 
     in excess of the non-Federal share.

     SEC. 585. SAN JACINTO DISPOSAL AREA, GALVESTON, TEXAS.

       Section 108 of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 1994 (107 Stat. 1320), is amended--
       (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by inserting 
     ``all or any part of'' after ``absolute title to'';
       (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
       ``(b) Compensation for Conveyance.--
       ``(1) In general.--Upon receipt of compensation from the 
     City of Galveston, the Secretary shall convey the parcel, or 
     any part of the parcel, as described in subsection (a).
       ``(2) Full parcel.--If the full 605-acre parcel is 
     conveyed, the compensation shall be--
       ``(A) conveyance to the Department of the Army of fee 
     simple absolute title to a parcel of land containing 
     approximately 564 acres on Pelican Island, Texas, in the 
     Eneas Smith Survey, A-190, Pelican Island, city of Galveston, 
     Galveston County, Texas, adjacent to property currently owned 
     by the United States, with the fair market value of the 
     parcel being determined in accordance with subsection (d); 
     and
       ``(B) payment to the United States of an amount equal to 
     the difference between the fair market value of the parcel to 
     be conveyed under subsection (a) and the fair market value of 
     the parcel to be conveyed under subparagraph (A).
       ``(3) Partial parcel.--If the conveyance is 125 acres or 
     less, compensation shall be an amount equal to the fair 
     market value of the parcel to be conveyed, with the fair 
     market value of the parcel being determined in accordance 
     with subsection (d).''; and
       (3) in the second sentence of subsection (c)--
       (A) by inserting ``, or any part of the parcel,'' after 
     ``parcel''; and
       (B) by inserting ``, if any,'' after ``LCA''.

     SEC. 586. WATER MONITORING STATION.

       Section 584(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended by striking ``$50,000'' and 
     inserting ``$100,000''.

     SEC. 587. OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT FACILITY, RHODE ISLAND.

       Section 585 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3791) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``river'' and inserting 
     ``sewer''; and
       (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``$30,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$60,000,000''.

     SEC. 588. LOWER CHENA RIVER, ALASKA.

       The Secretary may expend up to $500,000 in fiscal year 2000 
     to complete the dredging project initiated on the Lower Chena 
     River, Alaska.

     SEC. 589. NUMANA DAM FISH PASSAGE, NEVADA.

       After the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
     shall complete planning, design, and construction of the 
     Numana Dam Fish Passage

[[Page 20087]]

     Project, currently being evaluated under section 1135 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
     under section 906(b) of that Act (33 U.S.C. 2283(b)).

     SEC. 590. EMBREY DAM, VIRGINIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall remove the Embrey Dam 
     on the Rappahannock River at Fredericksburg, Virginia, at 
     full Federal expense.
       (b) Use of Existing Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite 
     the feasibility study and preconstruction, engineering, and 
     design of the project by using, to the maximum extent 
     practicable, existing studies prepared by the State and non-
     Federal interests.
       (c) Authorization.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
     to carry out this section $10,000,000.

     SEC. 591. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION, FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA.

       (a) Participation of Secretary.--
       (1) Authorization.--The Secretary shall participate with 
     other Federal departments and agencies in environmental 
     restoration and remediation activities (including the 
     demolition of contaminated buildings) at the Avtex Fibers 
     facility in Front Royal, Virginia, at full Federal expense.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000.
       (b) Participation of Secretary of Defense.--
       (1) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall make 
     available $5,000,000 for environmental restoration and 
     remediation activities (including the demolition of 
     contaminated buildings) at the Avtex Fibers facility in Front 
     Royal, Virginia.
       (2) Source of funds.--The amount made available under 
     paragraph (1) shall be derived from amounts in the 
     Environmental Restoration Account, Formerly Used Defense 
     Sites, established by section 2703 of title 10, United States 
     Code.

     SEC. 592. MISSISSIPPI.

       (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
     Federal interests in Mississippi.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in Mississippi, including 
     projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, 
     elimination or control of combined sewer overflows, water 
     supply and related facilities, environmental restoration, and 
     surface water resource protection and development.
       (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
     provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
     the project is publicly owned.
       (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
     into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
     each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in 
     the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
     completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
     local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
     The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
     the total construction costs of the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is 
     the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest 
     incurred in providing the non-Federal share of the project's 
     costs.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project costs (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
     project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
     the pilot program carried out under this section, including 
     recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
     implemented on a national basis.
       (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain 
     available until expended.

     SEC. 593. CENTRAL NEW MEXICO.

       (a) Definition of Central New Mexico.--In this section, the 
     term ``central New Mexico'' means the counties of Bernalillo, 
     Sandoval, and Valencia, New Mexico.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
     Federal interests in central New Mexico.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in central New Mexico, 
     including projects for wastewater treatment and related 
     facilities, water supply, conservation, and related 
     facilities, stormwater retention and remediation, 
     environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
     protection and development.
       (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
     provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
     the project is publicly owned.
       (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
     into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
     each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in 
     the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
     completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
     local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
     The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
     the total construction costs of the project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is 
     the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest 
     incurred in providing the non-Federal share of the project's 
     costs.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project costs (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
     project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
     the pilot program carried out under this section, including 
     recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
     implemented on a national basis.
       (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for 
     the period beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain 
     available until expended.

     SEC. 594. OHIO.

       (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall 
     establish a program to provide environmental assistance to 
     non-Federal interests in Ohio.
       (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in Ohio, including 
     projects for--
       (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
       (2) combined sewer overflow, water supply, storage, 
     treatment, and related facilities;
       (3) mine drainage;
       (4) environmental restoration; and
       (5) surface water resource protection and development.
       (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
     provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
     the project is publicly owned.

[[Page 20088]]

       (d) Project Cooperation Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a project cooperation 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each project cooperation agreement 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     development plan or resource protection plan, including 
     appropriate plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
     each project cooperation agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in 
     the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
     completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
     project cooperation agreement with the Secretary.
       (C) Credit for certain financing costs.--In case of a delay 
     in the reimbursement of the non-Federal share of the costs of 
     a project, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
     reasonable interest and other associated financing costs 
     necessary for the non-Federal interest to provide the non-
     Federal share of the project costs.
       (D) Land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of-way, and relocations provided by the 
     non-Federal interest toward the non-Federal share of project 
     costs (including costs associated with obtaining permits 
     necessary for the placement of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
     project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed 
     under an agreement entered into under this subsection shall 
     be 100 percent.
       (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (f) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
     the program carried out under this section, including 
     recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
     implemented on a national basis.
       (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $60,000,000.

     SEC. 595. RURAL NEVADA AND MONTANA.

       (a) Definition of Rural Nevada.--In this section, the term 
     ``rural Nevada'' means--
       (1) the counties of Lincoln, White Pine, Nye, Eureka, Elko, 
     Humbardt, Pershing, Churchill, Storey, Lyon, Carson, Douglas, 
     Mineral, Esmeralda, and Lander, Nevada;
       (2) the portions of Washoe County, Nevada, that are located 
     outside the cities of Reno and Sparks; and
       (3) the portions of Clark County, Nevada, that are located 
     outside the cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, and 
     Henderson and the unincorporated portion of the county in the 
     Las Vegas Valley.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program for providing environmental assistance to non-
     Federal interests in rural Nevada and Montana.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in rural Nevada and 
     Montana, including projects for--
       (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
       (2) water supply and related facilities;
       (3) environmental restoration; and
       (4) surface water resource protection and development.
       (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
     provide assistance for a project under this section only if 
     the project is publicly owned.
       (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
     into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
     each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in 
     the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
     completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
     local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is 
     the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest 
     incurred in providing the non-Federal share of the project 
     costs.
       (D) Land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations.--The 
     non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
     easements, rights-of way, and relocations provided by the 
     non-Federal interest toward the non-Federal share of project 
     costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
     obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
     and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
     controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
     project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
     the program carried out under this section, including 
     recommendations concerning whether the program should be 
     implemented on a national basis.
       (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section for the period 
     beginning with fiscal year 2001--
       (1) $25,000,00 for rural Nevada; and
       (2) $25,000,000 for Montana;
     to remain available until expended.

     SEC. 596. PHOENIX, ARIZONA.

       Section 1608 of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 
     Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-6) is amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
       ``(a) The Secretary, in cooperation with the city of 
     Phoenix, Arizona, shall participate in the planning, design, 
     and construction of the Phoenix Metropolitan Water 
     Reclamation and Reuse Project to utilize fully wastewater 
     from the regional wastewater treatment plant for direct 
     municipal, industrial, agricultural and environmental 
     purposes, groundwater recharge and indirect potable reuse in 
     the Phoenix metropolitan area.'';
       (2) in subsection (b), by striking the first sentence; and
       (3) by striking subsection (c).

     SEC. 597. NATIONAL HARBOR, MARYLAND.

       (a) In General.--The first section of Public Law 99-215 (99 
     Stat. 1724) is amended in the first sentence of subsection 
     (a)(2) by striking ``solely'' and inserting ``for 
     transportation or''.
       (b) Revision of Quitclaim Deed.--Not later than 30 days 
     after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 
     Interior shall--
       (1) with the consent of the grantee, withdraw and revise 
     any terms or conditions in the quitclaim deed of December 16, 
     1986, between the United States and the Maryland-National 
     Capital Park and Planning Commission that limit the authority 
     of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 
     to use the property for transportation purposes; and
       (2) prepare, execute, and record a deed that is consistent 
     with this section and the amendment made by subsection (a).
       (c) Effect on Environmental Law.--Nothing in this section 
     abrogates any requirement of any environmental law.
  TITLE VI--CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
     STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION

     SEC. 601. DEFINITIONS.

       In this title, the following definitions apply:
       (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the South 
     Dakota Cultural Resources Advisory Commission established by 
     section 605(j).
       (2) Restoration.--The term ``restoration'' means mitigation 
     of the habitat of wildlife.
       (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
     of the Army.
       (4) Terrestrial wildlife habitat.--The term ``terrestrial 
     wildlife habitat'' means a habitat for a wildlife species 
     (including game and nongame species) that existed or exists 
     on an upland habitat (including a prairie grassland, 
     woodland, bottom land forest, scrub, or shrub) or an emergent 
     wetland habitat.
       (5) Wildlife.--The term ``wildlife'' has the meaning given 
     the term in section 8 of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination 
     Act (16 U.S.C. 666b).

     SEC. 602. TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION.

       (a) Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Plans.--
       (1) In general.--In accordance with this subsection and in 
     consultation with the Secretary and the Secretary of the 
     Interior, the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux 
     Tribe, and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall, as a condition 
     of the receipt of funds under this title,

[[Page 20089]]

     each develop a plan for the restoration of terrestrial 
     wildlife habitat loss that occurred as a result of flooding 
     related to the Big Bend and Oahe projects carried out as part 
     of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program.
       (2) Submission of plan to secretary.--On completion of a 
     plan for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, the State 
     of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and the 
     Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall submit the plan to the 
     Secretary.
       (3) Review by secretary and submission to committees.--The 
     Secretary shall review the plan and submit the plan, with any 
     comments, to the appropriate committees of the Senate and the 
     House of Representatives.
       (4) Funding for carrying out plans.--
       (A) State of south dakota.--
       (i) Notification.--On receipt of the plan for terrestrial 
     wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the State of South 
     Dakota, each of the Committees referred to in paragraph (3) 
     shall notify the Secretary of the receipt of the plan.
       (ii) Availability of funds.--On notification in accordance 
     with clause (i), the Secretary shall make available to the 
     State of South Dakota funds from the South Dakota Terrestrial 
     Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund established under 
     section 603, to be used to carry out the plan for terrestrial 
     wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the State and only 
     after the Trust Fund is fully capitalized.
       (B) Cheyenne river sioux tribe and lower brule sioux 
     tribe.--
       (i) Notification.--On receipt of the plan for terrestrial 
     wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the Cheyenne River 
     Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, each of the 
     Committees referred to in paragraph (3) shall notify the 
     Secretary of the Treasury of the receipt of each of the 
     plans.
       (ii) Availability of funds.--On notification in accordance 
     with clause (i), the Secretary of the Treasury shall make 
     available to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
     Brule Sioux Tribe funds from the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 
     Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund and the 
     Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
     Restoration Trust Fund, respectively, established under 
     section 604, to be used to carry out the plan for terrestrial 
     wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the Cheyenne River 
     Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, respectively, 
     and only after the Trust Fund is fully capitalized.
       (C) Transition period.--
       (i) In general.--During the period described in clause 
     (ii), the Secretary shall--

       (I) fund the terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration 
     programs being carried out on the date of enactment of this 
     Act on Oahe and Big Bend project land and the plans 
     established under this section at a level that does not 
     exceed the highest amount of funding that was provided for 
     the programs during a previous fiscal year; and
       (II) fund the activities described in sections 603(d)(3) 
     and 604(d)(3).

       (ii) Period.--Clause (i) shall apply during the period--

       (I) beginning on the date of enactment of this Act; and
       (II) ending on the date on which funds are made available 
     for use from the South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
     Restoration Trust Fund under section 603(d)(3)(A)(i) and the 
     Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
     Restoration Trust Fund and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
     Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund under 
     section 604(d)(3)(A)(i).

       (b) Programs for the Purchase of Wildlife Habitat Leases.--
       (1) In general.--The State of South Dakota may use funds 
     made available under section 603(d)(3)(A)(iii) to develop a 
     program for the purchase of wildlife habitat leases that 
     meets the requirements of this subsection.
       (2) Development of a plan.--
       (A) In general.--If the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne 
     River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe elects to 
     conduct a program under this subsection, the State of South 
     Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower Brule 
     Sioux Tribe (in consultation with the United States Fish and 
     Wildlife Service and the Secretary and with an opportunity 
     for public comment) shall develop a plan to lease land for 
     the protection and development of wildlife habitat, including 
     habitat for threatened and endangered species, associated 
     with the Missouri River ecosystem.
       (B) Use for program.--The plan shall be used by the State 
     of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower 
     Brule Sioux Tribe in carrying out the program carried out 
     under paragraph (1).
       (3) Conditions of leases.--Each lease covered under a 
     program carried out under paragraph (1) shall specify that 
     the owner of the property that is subject to the lease shall 
     provide--
       (A) public access for sportsmen during hunting season; and
       (B) public access for other outdoor uses covered under the 
     lease, as negotiated by the landowner and the State of South 
     Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower Brule 
     Sioux Tribe.
       (4) Use of assistance.--
       (A) State of south dakota.--If the State of South Dakota 
     conducts a program under this subsection, the State may use 
     funds made available under section 603(d)(3)(A)(iii) to--
       (i) acquire easements, rights-of-way, or leases for 
     management and protection of wildlife habitat, including 
     habitat for threatened and endangered species, and public 
     access to wildlife on private property in the State of South 
     Dakota;
       (ii) create public access to Federal or State land through 
     the purchase of easements or rights-of-way that traverse such 
     private property; or
       (iii) lease land for the creation or restoration of a 
     wetland on such private property.
       (B) Cheyenne river sioux tribe and lower brule sioux 
     tribe.--If the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe or the Lower Brule 
     Sioux Tribe conducts a program under this subsection, the 
     Tribe may use funds made available under section 
     604(d)(3)(A)(iii) for the purposes described in subparagraph 
     (A).
       (c) Federal Obligation for Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
     Mitigation for the Big Bend and Oahe Projects in South 
     Dakota.--The establishment of the trust funds under sections 
     603 and 604 and the development and implementation of plans 
     for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration developed by the 
     State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and 
     the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe in accordance with this section 
     shall be considered to satisfy the Federal obligation under 
     the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et 
     seq.) for terrestrial wildlife habitat mitigation for the 
     State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and 
     the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe for the Big Bend and Oahe 
     projects carried out as part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River 
     Basin program.

     SEC. 603. SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT 
                   RESTORATION TRUST FUND.

       (a) Establishment.--There is established in the Treasury of 
     the United States a fund to be known as the ``South Dakota 
     Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund'' 
     (referred to in this section as the ``Fund'').
       (b) Funding.--For the fiscal year during which this Act is 
     enacted and each fiscal year thereafter until the aggregate 
     amount deposited in the Fund under this subsection is equal 
     to at least $108,000,000, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
     transfer $10,000,000 from the general fund of the Treasury to 
     the Fund.
       (c) Investments.--
       (1) In general.--At the request of the Secretary, the 
     Secretary of the Treasury shall invest the amounts deposited 
     under subsection (b) only in interest-bearing obligations of 
     the United States or in obligations guaranteed by the United 
     States as to both principal and interest.
       (2) Interest rate.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
     invest amounts in the fund in obligations that carry the 
     highest rate of interest among available obligations of the 
     required maturity.
       (d) Payments.--
       (1) In general.--All amounts credited as interest under 
     subsection (c) shall be available, without fiscal year 
     limitation, to the State of South Dakota for use in 
     accordance with paragraph (3) after the Fund has been fully 
     capitalized.
       (2) Withdrawal and transfer of funds.--Subject to section 
     602(a)(4)(A), the Secretary shall withdraw amounts credited 
     as interest under paragraph (1) and transfer the amounts to 
     the State of South Dakota for use as State funds in 
     accordance with paragraph (3) after the Fund has been fully 
     capitalized.
       (3) Use of transferred funds.--
       (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the State of 
     South Dakota shall use the amounts transferred under 
     paragraph (2) only to--
       (i) fully fund the annually scheduled work described in the 
     terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration plan of the State 
     developed under section 602(a); and
       (ii) with any remaining funds--

       (I) protect archaeological, historical, and cultural sites 
     located along the Missouri River on land transferred to the 
     State;
       (II) fund all costs associated with the ownership, 
     management, operation, administration, maintenance, and 
     development of recreation areas and other lands that are 
     transferred to the State of South Dakota by the Secretary;
       (III) purchase and administer wildlife habitat leases under 
     section 602(b);
       (IV) carry out other activities described in section 602; 
     and

       (V) develop and maintain public access to, and protect, 
     wildlife habitat and recreation areas along the Missouri 
     River.

       (B) Prohibition.--The amounts transferred under paragraph 
     (2) shall not be used for the purchase of land in fee title.
       (e) Transfers and Withdrawals.--Except as provided in 
     subsection (d), the Secretary may not transfer or withdraw 
     any amount deposited under subsection (b).
       (f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
     appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury such sums as 
     are necessary to pay the administrative expenses of the Fund.

     SEC. 604. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE AND LOWER BRULE SIOUX 
                   TRIBE TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION 
                   TRUST FUNDS.

       (a) Establishment.--There are established in the Treasury 
     of the United States 2 funds to be known as the ``Cheyenne 
     River Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Restoration Trust 
     Fund'' and the ``Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife 
     Habitat Restoration Trust Fund'' (each of which is referred 
     to in this section as a ``Fund'').
       (b) Funding.--
       (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), for the fiscal 
     year during which this Act is enacted

[[Page 20090]]

     and each fiscal year thereafter until the aggregate amount 
     deposited in the Funds under this subsection is equal to at 
     least $57,400,000, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
     transfer $5,000,000 from the general fund of the Treasury to 
     the Funds.
       (2) Allocation.--Of the total amount of funds deposited in 
     the Funds for a fiscal year, the Secretary of the Treasury 
     shall deposit--
       (A) 74 percent of the funds into the Cheyenne River Sioux 
     Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund; and
       (B) 26 percent of the funds into the Lower Brule Sioux 
     Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund.
       (c) Investments.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
     the amounts deposited under subsection (b) only in interest-
     bearing obligations of the United States or in obligations 
     guaranteed as to both principal and interest by the United 
     States.
       (2) Interest rate.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
     invest amounts in the Funds in obligations that carry the 
     highest rate of interest among available obligations of the 
     required maturity.
       (d) Payments.--
       (1) In general.--All amounts credited as interest under 
     subsection (c) shall be available after the Trust Funds are 
     fully capitalized, without fiscal year limitation, to the 
     Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
     for their use in accordance with paragraph (3).
       (2) Withdrawal and transfer of funds.--Subject to section 
     602(a)(4)(B), the Secretary of the Treasury shall withdraw 
     amounts credited as interest under paragraph (1) and transfer 
     the amounts to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
     Brule Sioux Tribe for use in accordance with paragraph (3).
       (3) Use of transferred funds.--
       (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the Cheyenne 
     River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall use 
     the amounts transferred under paragraph (2) only to--
       (i) fully fund the annually scheduled work described in the 
     terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration plan of the 
     respective Tribe developed under section 602(a); and
       (ii) with any remaining funds--

       (I) protect archaeological, historical, and cultural sites 
     located along the Missouri River on land transferred to the 
     respective Tribe;
       (II) fund all costs associated with the ownership, 
     management, operation, administration, maintenance, and 
     development of recreation areas and other lands that are 
     transferred to the respective Tribe by the Secretary;
       (III) purchase and administer wildlife habitat leases under 
     section 602(b);
       (IV) carry out other activities described in section 602; 
     and
       (V) develop and maintain public access to, and protect, 
     wildlife habitat and recreation areas along the Missouri 
     River.

       (B) Prohibition.--The amounts transferred under paragraph 
     (2) shall not be used for the purchase of land in fee title.
       (e) Transfers and Withdrawals.--Except as provided in 
     subsection (d), the Secretary of the Treasury may not 
     transfer or withdraw any amount deposited under subsection 
     (b).
       (f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
     appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury such sums as 
     are necessary to pay the administrative expenses of the Fund.

     SEC. 605. TRANSFER OF FEDERAL LAND TO STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

       (a) In General.--
       (1) Transfer.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary shall transfer to the 
     Department of Game, Fish and Parks of the State of South 
     Dakota (referred to in this section as the ``Department'') 
     the land and recreation areas described in subsections (b) 
     and (c) for fish and wildlife purposes, or public recreation 
     uses, in perpetuity.
       (B) Permits, rights-of-way, and easements.--All permits, 
     rights-of-way, and easements granted by the Secretary to the 
     Oglala Sioux Tribe for land on the west side of the Missouri 
     River between the Oahe Dam and Highway 14, and all permits, 
     rights-of-way, and easements on any other land administered 
     by the Secretary and used by the Oglala Sioux Rural Water 
     Supply System, are granted to the Oglala Sioux Tribe in 
     perpetuity to be held in trust under section 3(e) of the Mni 
     Wiconi Project Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 2568).
       (2) Uses.--The Department shall maintain and develop the 
     land outside the recreation areas for fish and wildlife 
     purposes in accordance with--
       (A) fish and wildlife purposes in effect on the date of 
     enactment of this Act; or
       (B) a plan developed under section 602.
       (3) Corps of engineers.--The transfer shall not interfere 
     with the Corps of Engineers operation of a project under this 
     section for an authorized purpose of the project under the 
     Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 
     U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.), or other applicable law.
       (4) Secretary.--The Secretary shall retain the right to 
     inundate with water the land transferred to the Department 
     under this section or draw down a project reservoir, as 
     necessary to carry out an authorized purpose of a project.
       (b) Land Transferred.--The land described in this 
     subsection is land that--
       (1) is located above the top of the exclusive flood pool of 
     the Oahe, Big Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavin's Point projects 
     of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program;
       (2) was acquired by the Secretary for the implementation of 
     the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program;
       (3) is located outside the external boundaries of a 
     reservation of an Indian Tribe; and
       (4) is located within the State of South Dakota.
       (c) Recreation Areas Transferred.--A recreation area 
     described in this section includes the land and facilities 
     within a recreation area that--
       (1) the Secretary determines, at the time of the transfer, 
     is a recreation area classified for recreation use by the 
     Corps of Engineers on the date of enactment of this Act;
       (2) is located outside the external boundaries of a 
     reservation of an Indian Tribe;
       (3) is located within the State of South Dakota;
       (4) is not the recreation area known as ``Cottonwood'', 
     ``Training Dike'', or ``Tailwaters''; and
       (5) is located below Gavin's Point Dam in the State of 
     South Dakota in accordance with boundary agreements and 
     reciprocal fishing agreements between the State of South 
     Dakota and the State of Nebraska in effect on the date of 
     enactment of this Act, which agreements shall continue to be 
     honored by the State of South Dakota as the agreements apply 
     to any land or recreation areas transferred under this title 
     to the State of South Dakota below Gavin's Point Dam and on 
     the waters of the Missouri River.
       (d) Map.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     Department, shall prepare a map of the land and recreation 
     areas transferred under this section.
       (2) Land.--The map shall identify--
       (A) land reasonably expected to be required for project 
     purposes during the 20-year period beginning on the date of 
     enactment of this Act; and
       (B) dams and related structures;
     which shall be retained by the Secretary.
       (3) Availability.--The map shall be on file in the 
     appropriate offices of the Secretary.
       (e) Schedule for Transfer.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army and the 
     Secretary of the Department shall jointly develop a schedule 
     for transferring the land and recreation areas under this 
     section.
       (2) Transfer deadline.--All land and recreation areas shall 
     be transferred not later than 1 year after the full 
     capitalization of the Trust Fund described in section 603.
       (f) Transfer Conditions.--The land and recreation areas 
     described in subsections (b) and (c) shall be transferred in 
     fee title to the Department on the following conditions:
       (1) Responsibility for damage.--The Secretary shall not be 
     responsible for any damage to the land caused by flooding, 
     sloughing, erosion, or other changes to the land caused by 
     the operation of any project of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River 
     Basin program (except as otherwise provided by Federal law).
       (2) Easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
     agreements.--The Department shall maintain all easements, 
     rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing agreements that are 
     in effect as of the date of the transfer.
       (g) Hunting and Fishing.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided in this section, 
     nothing in this title affects jurisdiction over the waters of 
     the Missouri River below the water's edge and outside the 
     exterior boundaries of an Indian reservation in South Dakota.
       (2) Jurisdiction.--
       (A) Transferred land.--On transfer of the land under this 
     section to the State of South Dakota, jurisdiction over the 
     land shall be the same as that over other land owned by the 
     State of South Dakota.
       (B) Land between the missouri river water's edge and the 
     level of the exclusive flood pool.--Jurisdiction over land 
     between the Missouri River water's edge and the level of the 
     exclusive flood pool outside Indian reservations in the State 
     of South Dakota shall be the same as that exercised by the 
     State on other land owned by the State, and that jurisdiction 
     shall follow the fluctuations of the water's edge.
       (C) Federal land.--Jurisdiction over land and water owned 
     by the Federal Government within the boundaries of the State 
     of South Dakota that are not affected by this title shall 
     remain unchanged.
       (3) Easements and access.--The Secretary shall provide the 
     State of South Dakota with easements and access on land and 
     water below the level of the exclusive flood pool outside 
     Indian reservations in the State of South Dakota for 
     recreational and other purposes (including for boat docks, 
     boat ramps, and related structures), so long as the easements 
     would not prevent the Corps of Engineers from carrying out 
     its mission under the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
     construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors 
     for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved 
     December 22, 1944 (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act 
     of 1944'') (58 Stat. 887)).
       (h) Applicability of Law.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of this Act, the following provisions of law shall 
     apply to land transferred under this section:
       (1) The National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 
     et seq.), including sections 106 and 304 of that Act (16 
     U.S.C. 470f, 470w-3).
       (2) The Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 
     U.S.C. 470aa et seq.), including sections 4, 6, 7, and 9 of 
     that Act (16 U.S.C. 470cc, 470ee, 470ff, 470hh).
       (3) The Native American Graves Protection Act and 
     Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et

[[Page 20091]]

     seq.), including subsections (a) and (d) of section 3 of that 
     Act (25 U.S.C. 3003).
       (i) Impact Aid.--The land transferred under subsection (a) 
     shall be deemed to continue to be owned by the United States 
     for purposes of section 8002 of the Elementary and Secondary 
     Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702).

     SEC. 606. TRANSFER OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS LAND FOR INDIAN 
                   TRIBES.

       (a) In General.--
       (1) Transfer.--The Secretary of the Army shall transfer to 
     the Secretary of the Interior the land and recreation areas 
     described in subsections (b) and (c) for the use of the 
     Indian Tribes in perpetuity.
       (2) Corps of engineers.--The transfer shall not interfere 
     with the Corps of Engineers operation of a project under this 
     section for an authorized purpose of the project under the 
     Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 
     U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.), or other applicable law.
       (3) Secretary of the army.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
     retain the right to inundate with water the land transferred 
     to the Secretary of the Interior under this section or draw 
     down a project reservoir, as necessary to carry out an 
     authorized purpose of a project.
       (4) Trust.--The Secretary of the Interior shall hold in 
     trust for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule 
     Sioux Tribe the land transferred under this section that is 
     located within the external boundaries of the reservation of 
     the Indian Tribes.
       (b) Land Transferred.--The land described in this 
     subsection is land that--
       (1) is located above the top of the exclusive flood pool of 
     the Big Bend and Oahe projects of the Pick-Sloan Missouri 
     River Basin program;
       (2) was acquired by the Secretary of the Army for the 
     implementation of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
     program; and
       (3) is located within the external boundaries of the 
     reservation of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
     Brule Sioux Tribe.
       (c) Recreation Areas Transferred.--A recreation area 
     described in this section includes the land and facilities 
     within a recreation area that--
       (1) the Secretary determines, at the time of the transfer, 
     is a recreation area classified for recreation use by the 
     Corps of Engineers on the date of enactment of this Act;
       (2) is located within the external boundaries of a 
     reservation of an Indian Tribe; and
       (3) is located within the State of South Dakota.
       (d) Map.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     governing bodies of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the 
     Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, shall prepare a map of the land 
     transferred under this section.
       (2) Land.--The map shall identify--
       (A) land reasonably expected to be required for project 
     purposes during the 20-year period beginning on the date of 
     enactment of this Act; and
       (B) dams and related structures;
     which shall be retained by the Secretary.
       (3) Availability.--The map shall be on file in the 
     appropriate offices of the Secretary.
       (e) Schedule for Transfer.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Chairmen of the 
     Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
     shall jointly develop a schedule for transferring the land 
     and recreation areas under this section.
       (2) Transfer deadline.--All land and recreation areas shall 
     be transferred not later than 1 year after the full 
     capitalization of the State and tribal Trust Fund described 
     in section 604.
       (f) Transfer Conditions.--The land and recreation areas 
     described in subsections (b) and (c) shall be transferred to, 
     and held in trust by, the Secretary of the Interior on the 
     following conditions:
       (1) Responsibility for damage.--The Secretary shall not be 
     responsible for any damage to the land caused by flooding, 
     sloughing, erosion, or other changes to the land caused by 
     the operation of any project of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River 
     Basin program (except as otherwise provided by Federal law).
       (2) Hunting and fishing.--
       (A) In general.--Except as provided in this section, 
     nothing in this title affects jurisdiction over the waters of 
     the Missouri River below the water's edge and within the 
     exterior boundaries of the Cheyenne River Sioux and Lower 
     Brule Sioux Tribe reservations.
       (B) Jurisdiction.--
       (i) In general.--On transfer of the land to the respective 
     tribes under this section, jurisdiction over the land and on 
     land between the water's edge and the level of the exclusive 
     flood pool within the respective Tribe's reservation 
     boundaries shall be the same as that over land held in trust 
     by the Secretary of the Interior on the Cheyenne River Sioux 
     Reservation and the Lower Brule Sioux Reservation, and that 
     jurisdiction shall follow the fluctuations of the water's 
     edge.
       (ii) Jurisdiction unaffected.--Jurisdiction over land and 
     water owned by the Federal Government and held in trust for 
     the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
     that is not affected by this title shall remain unchanged.
       (C) Easements and access.--The Secretary shall provide the 
     Tribes with such easements and access on land and water below 
     the level of the exclusive flood pool inside the respective 
     Indian reservations for recreational and other purposes 
     (including for boat docks, boat ramps, and related 
     structures), so long as the easements would not prevent the 
     Corps of Engineers from carrying out its mission under the 
     Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
     public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for 
     other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (commonly known 
     as the ``Flood Control Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 887)).
       (3) Easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
     agreements.--
       (A) Maintenance.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
     maintain all easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-
     sharing agreements that are in effect as of the date of the 
     transfer.
       (B) Payments to county.--The Secretary of the Interior 
     shall pay any affected county 100 percent of the receipts 
     from the easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
     agreements described in subparagraph (A).
       (g) Exterior Indian Reservation Boundaries.--Nothing in 
     this section diminishes, changes, or otherwise affects the 
     exterior boundaries of a reservation of an Indian Tribe.

     SEC. 607. ADMINISTRATION.

       (a) In General.--Nothing in this title diminishes or 
     affects--
       (1) any water right of an Indian Tribe;
       (2) any other right of an Indian Tribe, except as 
     specifically provided in another provision of this title;
       (3) any treaty right that is in effect on the date of 
     enactment of this Act;
       (4) any external boundary of an Indian reservation of an 
     Indian Tribe;
       (5) any authority of the State of South Dakota that relates 
     to the protection, regulation, or management of fish, 
     terrestrial wildlife, and cultural and archaeological 
     resources, except as specifically provided in this title; or
       (6) any authority of the Secretary, the Secretary of the 
     Interior, or the head of any other Federal agency under a law 
     in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, including--
       (A) the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 
     et seq.);
       (B) the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 
     U.S.C. 470aa et seq.);
       (C) the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 
     et seq.);
       (D) the Act entitled ``An Act for the protection of the 
     bald eagle'', approved June 8, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.);
       (E) the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.);
       (F) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
     seq.);
       (G) the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation 
     Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.);
       (H) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known 
     as the ``Clean Water Act'') (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.);
       (I) the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.); 
     and
       (J) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
     U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
       (b) Federal Liability for Damage.--Nothing in this title 
     relieves the Federal Government of liability for damage to 
     private property caused by the operation of the Pick-Sloan 
     Missouri River Basin program.
       (c) Flood Control.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     this title, the Secretary shall retain the authority to 
     operate the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program for 
     purposes of meeting the requirements of the Act of December 
     22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 U.S.C. 701-1 et 
     seq.).

     SEC. 608. STUDY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall arrange for the United 
     States Geological Survey, in consultation with the Bureau of 
     Indian Affairs and other appropriate Federal agencies, to 
     complete, not later than October 31, 1999, a comprehensive 
     study of the potential impacts of the transfer of land under 
     sections 605(b) and 606(b), including potential impacts on 
     South Dakota Sioux Tribes having water claims within the 
     Missouri River Basin, on water flows in the Missouri River.
       (b) No Transfer Pending Determination.--No transfer of land 
     under section 605(b) or 606(b) shall occur until the 
     Secretary determines, based on the study, that the transfer 
     of land under either section will not significantly reduce 
     the amount of water flow to the downstream States of the 
     Missouri River.
       (c) State Water Rights.--The results of the study shall not 
     affect, and shall not be taken into consideration in, any 
     proceeding to quantify the water rights of any State.
       (d) Indian Water Rights.--The results of the study shall 
     not affect, and shall not be taken into consideration in, any 
     proceeding to quantify the water rights of any Indian Tribe 
     or tribal nation.

     SEC. 609. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

       (a) Secretary.--There are authorized to be appropriated to 
     the Secretary such sums as are necessary--
       (1) to pay the administrative expenses incurred by the 
     Secretary in carrying out this title;
       (2) to fund the implementation of terrestrial wildlife 
     habitat restoration plans under section 602(a) and other 
     activities under sections 603(d)(3) and 604(d)(3); and
       (3) to fund the annual expenses (not to exceed the Federal 
     cost as of the date of enactment of this Act) of operating 
     recreation areas to be transferred under sections 605(c) and 
     606(c) or leased by the State of South Dakota or Indian 
     Tribes, until such time as the trust funds under sections 603 
     and 604 are fully capitalized.
       (b) Secretary of the Interior.--There are authorized to be 
     appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior such sums as 
     are necessary to pay the administrative expenses incurred by 
     the Secretary of the Interior in carrying out this title.

[[Page 20092]]

       And the House agree to the same.

     Bud Shuster,
     Don Young,
     Sherwood Boehlert,
     Richard H. Baker,
     John T. Doolittle,
     Don Sherwood,
     James L. Oberstar,
     Robert A. Borski,
     Ellen Tauscher,
     Brian Baird,
                                Managers on the Part of the House.

     John H. Chafee,
     John Warner,
     Bob Smith,
     George V. Voinovich,
     Max Baucus,
     Daniel Moynihan,
                               Managers on the Part of the Senate.

       JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE

       The Managers on the part of the House and Senate at the 
     conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the 
     amendment of the House to the bill (S. 507), to provide for 
     the conservation and development of water and related 
     resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to 
     construct various projects for other purposes, submit the 
     following joint statement to the House and Senate in 
     explanation of the effect of the action agreed upon by the 
     managers and recommended in the accompanying conference 
     report:
       The House amendment struck all of the Senate bill after the 
     enacting clause and inserted a substitute text.
       The Senate recedes from its disagreement to the amendment 
     of the House with an amendment that is a substitute for the 
     Senate bill and the House amendment. The differences between 
     the Senate bill, the House amendment, and the substitute 
     agreed to in conference are noted below, except for clerical 
     corrections, conforming changes made necessary by agreements 
     reached by the conferees, and minor drafting and clerical 
     changes.

                   Title I--Water Resources Projects


                  Section 101. Project Authorizations.

     101(a) Projects with Chief's Reports
       101(a)(1) Nome Harbor Improvements, Alaska. House 
     Sec. 101(b)(1), Senate Sec. 101(b)(1).--Senate recedes with 
     an amendment.
       101(a)(2) Sand Point Harbor, Alaska. House Sec. 101(a)(1), 
     Senate Sec. 101(a)(1).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(3) Seward Harbor, Alaska. House Sec. 101(b)(2), 
     Senate Sec. 101(b)(2).--Senate recedes with an amendment.
       101(a)(4) Rio Salado, Salt River, Phoenix and Tempe, 
     Arizona. House Sec. 101(a)(2), Senate Sec. 101(a)(2).--Senate 
     recedes.
       101(a)(5) Tucson Drainage Area, Arizona. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(3), Senate Sec. 101(a)(3).--House recedes.
       101(a)(6) American and Sacramento Rivers, California. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(4), Senate Sec. 101(a)(4).--Senate recedes with 
     an amendment.
       101(a)(7) Oakland Harbor, California. House Sec. 101(a)(5), 
     Senate Sec. 101(b)(5).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(8) South Sacramento County Streams, California. 
     House Sec. 101(a)(6), Senate Sec. 101(a)(6).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(9) Upper Guadalupe River, California. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(7), Senate Sec. 101(a)(7).--House recedes.
       101(a)(10) Yuba River Basin, California. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(8), Senate Sec. 101(a)(8).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(11) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-
     Broadkill Beach, Delaware. House Sec. 101(a)(9), Senate 
     Sec. 101(a)(9).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(12) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New Jersey 
     - Port Mahon, Delaware. House Sec. 101(a)(10), Senate 
     Sec. 101(a)(10).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(13) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-
     Roosevelt Inlet-Lewes Beach, Delaware. House Sec. 101(a)(11), 
     Senate Sec. 101(b)(7).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(14) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New Jersey: 
     Villas and Vicinity, New Jersey. House Sec. 101(a)(12), 
     Senate Sec. 101(b)(16).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(15) Delaware Coast from Cape Henelopen to Fenwick 
     Island, Bethany Beach/South Bethany Beach, Delaware. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(13), Senate Sec. 101(b)(8).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(16) Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida. 
     Senate Sec. 101(a)(11). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.
       101(a)(17) Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(14), Senate Sec. 101(b)(9).--House recedes.
       The conferees understand the Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers for the navigation project at Jacksonville Harbor, 
     Florida, recognizes that a re-evaluation of the project based 
     on a potential change in the commercial navigation fleet 
     could result in redesignation of the locally preferred plan 
     as the National Economic Development Plan. Furthermore, if 
     the locally preferred plan is redesignated as the National 
     Economic Development Plan, cost sharing for the recommended 
     plan shall be in accordance with section 101 of the Water 
     Development Act of 1986.
       101(a)(18) Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(15), Senate Sec. 101(a)(14).--House recedes.
       101(a)(19) Brunswick Harbor, Georgia. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(16), Senate Sec. 101(a)(15).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(20) Beargrass Creek, Kentucky. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(17), Senate Sec. 101(a)(16).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(21) Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East 
     Baton Rouge Parish Watershed. House Sec. 101(a)(18), Senate 
     Sec. 101(a)(17).--House recedes.
       101(a)(22) Baltimore Harbor Anchorages and Channels, 
     Maryland and Virginia. House Sec. 101(a)(19), Senate 
     Sec. 101(a)(18).--House recedes.
       101(a)(23) Red River Lake at Crookston, Minnesota. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(20), Senate Sec. 101(a)(19).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(24) Turkey Creek Basin, Kansas City, Missouri, and 
     Kansas City, Kansas. House Sec. 101(a)(21), Senate 
     Sec. 101(b)(13).--Senate recedes.
       101(a)(25) Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New 
     Jersey. House Sec. 101(a)(22), Senate Sec. 101(b)(17).--House 
     recedes with an amendment.
       101(a)(26) Townsends Inlet to Cape May Inlet, New Jersey. 
     House Sec. 101(a)(23), Senate Sec. 101(a)(20).--House recedes 
     with an amendment.
       101(a)(27) Guanajibo River, Puerto Rico. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(24). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       101(a)(28) Rio Grande de Manati, Barceloneta, Puerto Rico. 
     House Sec. 101(a)(25). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       101(a)(29) Rio Nigua at Salinas, Puerto Rico. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(26). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       101(a)(30) Salt Creek, Graham, Texas. House 
     Sec. 101(a)(27), Senate Sec. 101(a)(22).--Senate recedes.
     101(b) Projects subject to report
       The conference report includes project authorizations for 
     which the Chief of Engineers has not yet completed a final 
     report, but for which such reports are anticipated by 
     December 31, 1999. These projects have been included in order 
     to assure that projects anticipated to satisfy the necessary 
     technical documentation by December 31, 1999 are not delayed 
     in each case that the final reports can be completed by the 
     end of 1999.
       101(b)(1) Heritage Harbor, Wrangell, Alaska. No comparable 
     House or Senate section.
       101(b)(2) Arroyo Pasajero, California. House Sec. 518(1), 
     Senate Sec. 101(b)(3).--House recedes.
       The conferees understand that there may be potentially 
     significant impacts on endangered species and state 
     ecological reserve lands. Consequently, the conferees believe 
     that a full range of reasonable alternatives should be 
     considered.
       101(b)(3) Hamilton Airfield, California. House 
     Sec. 101(b)(3), Senate Sec. 101(b)(4).--House recedes.
       In the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Congress 
     provided that publicly or privately owned upland sites may be 
     considered for dredged material disposal. The Secretary 
     should consider developing a management plan that addresses 
     the equitable distribution of the dredged material in the San 
     Francisco Bay area to various upland sites in cases where 
     dredged material from Corps of Engineers construction or 
     maintenance dredging is available for beneficial use or other 
     upland disposal methods. In comparing the costs and benefits 
     of public and private disposal options, the Secretary shall 
     consider all costs and benefits, including all publicly 
     funded costs, to ensure that an objective and equitable 
     comparison of private and public facilities occurs.
       101(b)(4) Success Dam, Tule River Basin, California. House 
     Sec. 518(2), Senate Sec. 101(b)(6).--House recedes with an 
     amendment.
       101(b)(5) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New Jersey: 
     Oakwood Beach, New Jersey. House Sec. 101(b)(4), Senate 
     Sec. 101(b)(14).--House recedes with an amendment.
       101(b)(6) Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New Jersey: 
     Reeds Beach and Pierces Point, New Jersey. House 
     Sec. 101(b)(5), Senate Sec. 101(b)(15).--Senate recedes.
       101(b)(7) Little Talbot Island, Duval County, Florida. 
     House Sec. 101(b)(6), Senate Sec. 101(b)(10).--Senate 
     recedes.
       101(b)(8) Ponce de Leon Inlet, Florida. House 
     Sec. 101(b)(7), Senate Sec. 101(b)(11).--Senate recedes.
       101(b)(9) Savannah Harbor Expansion, Georgia. House 
     Sec. 101(b)(8), Senate Sec. 101(b)(12).--Senate recedes.
       101(b)(10) Des Plaines River, Illinois. House 
     Sec. 101(b)(9). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes 
     with an amendment.
       101(b)(11) Reelfoot Lake, Kentucky and Tennessee. No 
     comparable House or Senate section.
       101(b)(12) Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor, Brigantine 
     Island, New Jersey. House Sec. 101(b)(10), Senate 
     Sec. 101(b)(18).--Senate recedes with an amendment.
       101(b)(13) Columbia River Channel, Oregon and Washington. 
     House Sec. 101(b)(11), Senate Sec. 101(b)(19).--Senate 
     recedes.
       101(b)(14) Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas. House 
     Sec. 101(b)(12), Senate Sec. 101(b)(21).--Senate recedes.
       101(b)(15) Howard Hanson Dam, Washington. House 
     Sec. 101(b)(13), Senate Sec. 101(b)(22).--House recedes.
       The managers recognize that the cost sharing for the Howard 
     Hanson Dam project could appropriately be affected by the 
     recent listing of the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon as a 
     protected species under the Endangered Species Act. The 
     United States Department of Commerce, National Marine 
     Fisheries Service, has stated its intent to consult with

[[Page 20093]]

     both the Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Tacoma 
     concerning responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act 
     as it relates to the Howard Hanson Dam project and the City 
     of Tacoma water diversion project. One of the purposes of the 
     project being authorized is to develop a fish passage for 
     downstream migration of salmon. When this consultation 
     process is completed, the appropriate cost sharing allocation 
     for the project may be different from that stated in the 
     report of the Chief of Engineers. Therefore, it is the 
     understanding of the managers that the Secretary, after 
     consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, will, if 
     appropriate, revise the allocation of cost sharing found in 
     the final report of the Chief of Engineers to reflect the 
     responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act for the 
     protection of the threatened Puget Sound Chinook Salmon.


                 Sec. 102. Small Flood Control Projects

       102(a)(1) Eyak River, Cordova, Alaska. Senate Sec. 322. No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       102(a)(2) Salcha River and Piledriver Slough, Fairbanks, 
     Alaska. Senate Sec. 321. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.
       102(a)(3) Lancaster, California. House Sec. 102(a)(1). No 
     comparable Senate Section.--Senate recedes.
       102(a)(4) Magpie Creek. California. No comparable House or 
     Senate section.
       102(a)(5) Gateway Triangle Area, Collier County, Florida. 
     House Sec. 102(a)(2), Senate Sec. 104(1).--Senate recedes.
       102(a)(6) Plant City, Florida. House Sec. 102(a)(3), Senate 
     Sec. 104(m).--Senate recedes.
       102(a)(7) Stone Island, Lake Monroe, Florida. House 
     Sec. 102(a)(4). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       102(a)(8) Ohio River, Illinois. House Sec. 102(a)(5). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       102(a)(9) Hamilton Dam, Michigan. Senate Sec. 327. No 
     comparable House section.--House recedes.
       102(a)(10) Repaupo Creek, New Jersey. House Sec. 102(a)(6), 
     Senate Sec. 303(2).--Senate recedes with an amendment.
       102(a)(11) Irondequoit Creek, New York. Senate Sec. 303(3). 
     No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       102(a)(12) Owasco Lake Seawall, New York. House 
     Sec. 102(7). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       102(a)(13) Port Clinton, Ohio. House Sec. 102(a)(8). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       102(a)(14) Abington Township, Pennsylvania. House 
     Sec. 102(a)(10). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       102(a)(15) Port Indian, West Norriton Township, Montgomery 
     County, Pennsylvania. House Sec. 102(a)(11). No comparable 
     Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       102(a)(16) Port Providence, Upper Providence Township, 
     Pennsylvania. House
       Sec. 102(a)(12). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       102(a)(17) Springfield Township, Montgomery County, 
     Pennsylvania. House
       Sec. 102(a)(13). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       102(a)(18) Tawney Run Creek, Pennsylvania. No comparable 
     House or Senate section.
       102(a)(19) Wissahickon Watershed, Pennsylvania. No 
     comparable House or Senate section.
       102(a)(20) Tioga County, Pennsylvania. Senate Sec. 303(3). 
     No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       102(a)(21) First Creek, Knoxville, Tennessee. House 
     Sec. 102(a)14. No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       102(a)(22) Metro Center Levee, Cumberland River, Nashville, 
     Tennessee. House Sec. 102(a)15). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       102(b) Festus and Crystal City, Missouri. House 
     Sec. 102(b). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes 
     with an amendment.
       102(b) Subsection (b) provides that the maximum Federal 
     expenditure for the Festus and Crystal City, Missouri flood 
     control project shall be $10,000,000 and directs the 
     Secretary to make corresponding changes to the project 
     cooperation agreement. Nothing in this subsection affects any 
     applicable cost sharing requirements under the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986.


              Sec. 103. Small Bank Stabilization Projects

       103(a)(1) Arctic Ocean, Barrow, Alaska. Senate Sec. 305(a). 
     No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       103(a)(2) Saint Joseph River Indiana. House Sec. 103(1). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       103(a)(3) Saginaw River, Bay City, Michigan. House 
     Sec. 103(2), Senate Sec. 305(b).--Senate recedes.
       103(a)(4) Big Timber Creek, New Jersey. House Sec. 103(3). 
     No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       103(a)(5) Lake Shore Road, Athol Springs, New York. House 
     Sec. 103(4). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       103(a)(6) Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New York. House 
     Sec. 101(5). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       103(a)(7) Monroe County, Ohio. House Sec. 103(6). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       103(a)(8) Green Valley, West Virginia. House Sec. 103(7). 
     No comparable Senate section - Senate recedes.
       103(b) Yellowstone River, Billings, Montana. Senate 
     Sec. 305(c). No comparable House section.--House recedes.


                  Sec. 104. Small Navigation Projects

       104(1) Grand Marais, Arkansas. House Sec. 104(1). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       104(2) Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt Harbor, California. 
     House Sec. 104(2), Senate Sec. 104(e).--Senate recedes.
       104(3) San Mateo (Pillar Point Harbor), California. House 
     Sec. 104(3). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       104(4) Agana Marina, Guam. House Sec. 104(4), Senate 
     Sec. 104(yy).--Senate recedes.
       104(5) Agat Marina, Guam. House Sec. 104(5), Senate 
     Sec. 104(vv).--Senate recedes.
       104(6) Apra Harbor Fuel Piers, Guam. House Sec. 104(6), 
     Senate Sec. 104(xx).--Senate recedes.
       104(7) Apra Harbor Pier F-6, Guam. House Sec. 104(7). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       104(8) Apra Harbor Seawall, Guam. House Sec. 104(8), Senate 
     Sec. 104(ww).--Senate recedes.
       104(9) Guam Harbor, Guam. House Sec. 104(9). No comparable 
     Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       104(10) Illinois River Near Chautauqua Park, Illinois. 
     House Sec. 104(10). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       104(11) Whiting Shoreline Waterfront, Whiting, Indiana. 
     House Sec. 104(11). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       104(12) Union River, Ellsworth, Maine. House Sec. 104(13). 
     No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       104(13) Naraguagus River, Machias, Maine. House 
     Sec. 104(12). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       104(14) Detroit Waterfront, Michigan. House Sec. 104(14). 
     No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       104(15) Fortescue Inlet, Delaware Bay, New Jersey. House 
     Sec. 104(15), Senate Sec. 304(9).--Senate recedes.
       104(16) Braddock Bay, Greece, New York. Senate 
     Sec. 304(10). No comparable House section.--House recedes.
       104(17) Buffalo and LaSalle Park, New York. House 
     Sec. 104(16). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       104(18) Sturgeon Point, New York. House Sec. 104(17). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       104(19) Fairpoint Harbor, Ohio. House Sec. 104(18). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.


      Sec. 105. Small Projects for Improvement of the Environment

       House Sec. 105(a). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.
       105(b) Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California. House 
     Sec. 105(b), Senate Sec. 332.--House recedes.


         Sec. 106. Small Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Projects

       106(1) Contra Costa County, Bay Delta, California. House 
     Sec. 106(1). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(2) Indian River, Florida. House Sec. 106(2). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(3) Little Wekiva River, Florida. House Sec. 106(3). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(4) Cook County, Illinois. House Sec. 106(4). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(5) Grand Batture Island, Mississippi. House 
     Sec. 106(5). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(6) Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, 
     Mississippi. House Sec. 106(6). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       106(7) Mississippi River and River Des Peres, St. Louis, 
     Missouri. House Sec. 106(7), Senate Sec. 201(e)(3).--Senate 
     recedes.
       106(8) Hudson River, New York. House Sec. 106(8). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(9) Oneida Lake, New York. House Sec. 106(9). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(10) Otsego Lake, New York. House Sec. 106(10). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(11) North Fork of Yellow Creek, Ohio. House 
     Sec. 106(11). No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(12) Wheeling Creek Watershed, Ohio. House Sec. 106(12). 
     No comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(13) Springfield Millrace, Oregon. House Sec. 106(13), 
     Senate Sec. 306.--Senate recedes.
       106(14) Upper Amazon Creek, Oregon. House Sec. 106(14). No 
     comparable Senate section.--Senate recedes.
       106(15) Lake Ontelaunee Reservoir, Berks County, 
     Pennsylvania. House Sec. 106(15). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.
       106(16) Blackstone River Basin, Rhode Island and 
     Massachusetts. House Sec. 106(16). No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes.

                      Title II--General Provisions


                Sec. 201. Small Flood Control Authority.

       House Sec. 201, Senate Sec. 203.--House recedes.


  Sec. 202. Use of Non-Federal Funds for Compiling and Disseminating 
                Information on Floods and Flood Damages

       House Sec. 202, Senate Sec. 204.--House recedes.


      Sec. 203. Contributions by States and Political Subdivisions

       House Sec. 203, Senate Sec. 207.--House recedes.


             Sec. 204. Sediment Decontamination Technology

       House Sec. 204, Senate Sec. 218.--Senate recedes.

[[Page 20094]]




                  Sec. 205. Control of Aquatic Plants

       House Sec. 205, Senate Sec. 214.--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


  Sec. 206. Use of Continuing Contracts Required for Construction of 
                            Certain Projects

       House Sec. 206. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


  Sec. 207. Water Resources Development Studies for the Pacific Region

       House Sec. 208, Senate Sec. 209.--Senate recedes.


      Sec. 208. Everglades and South Florida Ecosystem Restoration

       House Sec. 209, Senate Sec. 331, Senate Sec. 102(k) and 
     Senate Sec. 309.--Senate recedes to the House with an 
     amendment to subsections (a) and (b) and a new subsection 
     (d).


             Sec. 209. Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material

       House Sec. 210, Senate Sec. 206.--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


                Sec. 210. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration

       House Sec. 212, Senate Sec. 205.--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


      Sec. 211. Watershed Management, Restoration, and Development

       House Sec. 213, Senate Sec. 216.--House recedes with 
     amendments at subsections (1) and (3).
       Under this section, the managers support providing 
     technical assistance to the non-Federal interests in the 
     communities of Springfield and Decatur, Illinois in the 
     Illinois River Watershed for the purpose of identifying high 
     nitrate levels in water supplies and assisting with methods 
     for reducing such levels.


   Sec. 212. Flood Mitigation and Riverine Restoration Pilot Program

       House Sec. 214, Senate Sec. 201.--Senate recedes to the 
     House with amendments at subsections (b)(e)(g) and (h).


                   Sec. 213. Shore Management Program

       House Sec. 215. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


            Sec. 214. Shore Damage Prevention or Mitigation

       House Sec. 217, Senate Sec. 228.--House recedes with 
     amendment.


                       Sec. 215. Shore Protection

       House Sec. 218(a), Senate Sec. 202.--House recedes with an 
     amendment.
       House Sec. 218(b), Senate Sec. 211(a).--Senate recedes.
       Senate Sec. 211(b). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.
       House Sec. 218(c). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.
       House Sec. 218(d). No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                Sec. 216. Flood Prevention Coordination

       House Sec. 219. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           Sec. 217. Disposal of Dredged Material on Beaches

       Senate Sec. 219. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes with an amendment.


                 Sec. 218. Annual Passes for Recreation

       House Sec. 220. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             Sec. 219. Nonstructural Flood Control Projects

       House Sec. 222, Senate Sec. 213.--Senate recedes.


                        Sec. 220. Lakes Program

       House Sec. 223, Senate Sec. 217.--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


          Sec. 221. Enhancement of Fish and Wildlife Resources

       House Sec. 225, Senate Sec. 220.--Senate recedes.


       Sec. 222. Purchase of American-made Equipment and Products

       House Sec. 226. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


    Sec. 223. Construction of Flood Control Projects by non-Federal 
                                Interest

       House Sec. 224, Senate Sec. 221.--Senate recedes with 
     amendments.


                    Sec. 224. Environmental Dredging

       House Sec. 228, Senate Sec. 212.--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


                    Sec. 225. Recreational User Fees

       Senate Sec. 208. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


            Sec. 226. Small Storm Damage Reduction Projects

       Senate Sec. 227. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                  Sec. 227. Use of Private Enterprises

       Senate Sec. 232. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes with an amendment.

                 Title III--Project Related Provisions


Sec. 301. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation, Alabama and 
                              Mississippi

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                   Sec. 302. Ouzinkie Harbor, Alaska

       House Sec. 302. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes to House with an amendment.


              Sec. 303. St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, Alaska

       No comparable House or Senate section.


     Sec. 304. Loggy Bayou, Red River Below Denison Dam, Arkansas, 
                     Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas

       House Sec. 305. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes to House with an amendment.


          Sec. 305. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California

       House Sec. 306. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                Sec. 306. San Lorenzo River, California

       House Sec. 307, Senate Sec. 102(a)(1).--House recedes with 
     an amendment.


            Sec. 307. Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California

       House Sec. 308. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


Sec. 308. Delaware River, Mainstem and Channel Deepening, Delaware, New 
                        Jersey, and Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 309. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       Sec. 309. Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia

       House Sec. 310. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                   Sec. 310. Brevard County, Florida

       House Sec. 311. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


         Sec. 311. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida

       House Sec. 312. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 Sec. 312. Lee County, Captiva Island Segment, Florida, Periodic Beach 
                              Nourishment

       House Sec. 227(a), Senate Sec. 102(u).--House recedes.


                     Sec. 313. Fort Pierce, Florida

       House Sec. 313, Senate Sec. 102(b)(1).--Senate recedes with 
     an amendment.


                    Sec. 314. Nassau County, Florida

       House Sec. 314. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                Sec. 315. Miami Harbor Channel, Florida

       House Sec. 315. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                    Sec. 316. St. Augustine, Florida

       House Sec. 363(d), Senate Sec. 102(a)(2).--Senate recedes.


                      Sec. 317. Milo Creek, Idaho

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                   Sec. 318. Lake Michigan, Illinois

       House Sec. 316, Senate Sec. 102(l).--House recedes.


                    Sec. 319. Springfield, Illinois

       House Sec. 317. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     Sec. 320. Ogden Dunes, Indiana

       House Sec. 319. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


           Sec. 321. Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana

       House Sec. 320. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     Sec. 322. White River, Indiana

       House Sec. 321, Senate Sec. 102(s).--House recedes.


                        Sec. 323. Dubuque, Iowa

       Senate Sec. 102(n). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                Sec. 324. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana

       House Sec. 322, Senate Sec. 104(y).--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


              Sec. 325. Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana

       House Sec. 323, Senate Sec. 104(w).--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


         Sec. 326. Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Lousiana

       House Sec. 324, Senate Sec. 102(o).--House recedes.


          Sec. 327. Twelve-Mile Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana

       House Sec. 325, Senate Sec. 104(a).--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


  Sec. 328. West Bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal) 
                               Louisiana

       House Sec. 326. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


        Sec. 329. Tolchester Channel S-Turn, Baltimore, Maryland

       House Sec. 327, Senate Sec. 102(d).--House recedes.


        Sec. 330. Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan

       House Sec. 328. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 Sec. 331. Jackson County, Mississippi

       House Sec. 329, Senate Sec. 102(p).--House recedes.


       Sec. 332. Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri

       House Sec. 331. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       Sec. 333. Meramec River Basin, Valley Park Levee, Missouri

       House Sec. 332. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 Sec. 334. Missouri River Mitigation Project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, 
                              and Nebraska

       House Sec. 333. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              Sec. 335. Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska

       House Sec. 334, Senate Sec. 102(a)(3).--Senate recedes.


                  Sec. 336. Absecon Island, New Jersey

       House Sec. 335, Senate Sec. 102(a)(4).--Senate recedes.


   Sec. 337. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Port Jersey, New 
                                 Jersey

       House Sec. 336, Senate Sec. 102(b)(4).--Senate recedes with 
     an amendment.

[[Page 20095]]




             Sec. 338. Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey

       House Sec. 339, Senate Sec. 102(a)(5).--House recedes with 
     an amendment.


   Sec. 339. Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, New York and New 
                                 Jersey

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                   Sec. 340. New York City Watershed

       House Sec. 340, Senate Sec. 325.--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


                 Sec. 341. New York State Canal System

       House Sec. 341. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


         Sec. 342. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, New York

       House Sec. 342. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


          Sec. 343. Broken Bow Lake, Red River Basin, Oklahoma

       House Sec. 343. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  Sec. 344. Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
                                 Oregon

       House Sec. 344, Senate Sec. 102(b)(5).--Senate recedes with 
     an amendment.


               Sec. 345. Curwensville Lake, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 346. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


          Sec. 346. Delaware River, Pennsylvania and Delaware

       House Sec. 347. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                  Sec. 347. Mussers Dam, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 348. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  Sec. 348. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

       No comparable House or Senate section.


        Sec. 349. Nine-Mile Run, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 349, Senate Sec. 316.--House recedes.


                 Sec. 350. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 350. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                 Sec. 351. South Central, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 351. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


     Sec. 352. Foxpoint Hurricane Barrier, Providence, Rhode Island

       Senate Sec. 102(t). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


       Sec. 353. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina

       House Sec. 352, Senate Sec. 102(f).--House recedes.


                      Sec. 354. Clear Creek, Texas

       House Sec. 354. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                     Sec. 355. Cypress Creek, Texas

       House Sec. 355. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           Sec. 356. Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas

       House Sec. 356, Senate Sec. 102(g).--Senate recedes.


                   Sec. 357. Upper Jordan River, Utah

       House Sec. 357. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


            Sec. 358. Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia

       House Sec. 358, Senate Sec. 102(i).--House recedes.


        Sec. 359. Columbia River Channel, Washington and Oregon

       Senate Sec. 102(v). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


               Sec. 360. Greenbrier Basin, West Virginia

       House Sec. 360. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


       Sec. 361. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia

       House Sec. 359. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  Sec. 362. Moorefield, West Virginia

       House Sec. 361, Senate Sec. 102(j).--Senate recedes.


         Sec. 363. West Virginia and Pennsylvania Flood Control

       House Sec. 362. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   Sec. 364. Project Reauthorizations

       House Sec. 363(b), (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), Senate 
     Sec. 101(a)(12), (13), (21) and (b)(20).--Senate recedes with 
     an amendment.


                   Sec. 365. Project Deauthorizations

       House Sec. 364(a)(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), 
     (9), (10), (11), (12), (b), (c), Senate Sec. 103(a), (b), 
     (c), (d), (e), (f), and 102(b)(3).--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


          Sec. 366. American and Sacramento Rivers, California

       House Sec. 365. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                       Sec. 367. Martin, Kentucky

       House Sec. 366. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             Sec. 368. Southern West Virginia Pilot Program

       House Sec. 367. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


     Sec. 369. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Jackson, Alabama

       House Sec. 368. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


           Sec. 370. Tropicana Wash and Flamingo Wash, Nevada

       House Sec. 369, Senate Sec. 102(e).--House recedes.


                   Sec. 371. Comite River, Louisiana

       House Sec. 370. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  Sec. 372. St. Marys River, Michigan

       House Sec. 371. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     Sec. 373. Charlevoix, Michigan

       House Sec. 372, Senate Sec. 326.--House recedes.


           Sec. 374. White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri

       Senate Sec. 104(d). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes with an amendment.


     Sec. 375. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma, Water Conveyance Facilities

       House Sec. 555, Senate Sec. 102(a)(6).--Senate recedes with 
     an amendment.

                           Title IV--Studies


                Sec. 401. Deep Draft Harbor Cost Sharing

       House Sec. 211. No comparable Senate section.--House 
     recedes with an amendment.


                     Sec. 402. Boydsville, Arkansas

       Senate Sec. 104(b). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                 Sec. 403. Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas

       House Sec. 303. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                 Sec. 404. Del Norte County, California

       House Sec. 428. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           Sec. 405. Frazier Creek, Tulare County, California

       Senate Sec. 104(f). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                Sec. 406. Mare Island Strait, California

       No comparable House or Senate section.


            Sec. 407. Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, California

       Senate Sec. 104(g). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


      Sec. 408. Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California

       House Sec. 404. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              Sec. 409. Whitewater River Basin, California

       House Sec. 405. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                Sec. 410. Destin-Noriega Point, Florida

       Senate Sec. 104(k). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


         Sec. 411. Little Econlackhatchee River Basin, Florida

       House Sec. 406. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                Sec. 412. Port Everglades Inlet, Florida

       House Sec. 407, Senate Sec. 104(j).--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


  Sec. 413. Lake Allatoona, Etowah River, and Little River Watershed, 
                                Georgia

       House Sec. 533. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                         Sec. 414. Boise, Idaho

       Senate Sec. 104(n). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


             Sec. 415. Goose Creek Watershed, Oakley, Idaho

       Senate Sec. 104(o). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


              Sec. 416. Little Wood River, Goodling, Idaho

       Senate Sec. 104(p). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                 Sec. 417. Snake River, Lewiston, Idaho

       Senate Sec. 104(q). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


             Sec. 418. Snake River and Payette River, Idaho

       Senate Sec. 104(r). No comparable House Section.--House 
     recedes.


    Sec. 419. Upper Des Plaines River and Tributaries, Illinois and 
                               Wisconsin

       House Sec. 408. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


      Sec. 420. Cameron Parish West of Calcasieu River, Louisiana

       House Sec. 409, Senate Sec. 104(t).--House recedes.


                      Sec. 421. Coastal Louisiana

       Senate Sec. 104(u). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes with an amendment.


              Sec. 422. Grand Isle and Vicinity, Louisiana

       House Sec. 410. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


Sec. 423. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Ecosystem, Chef Menteur to Sabine 
                            River, Louisiana

       Senate Sec. 104(x). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


       Sec. 424. Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts

       Senate Sec. 104(aa). No comparable House section Section 
     recedes with an amendment.


                   Sec. 425. Westport, Massachusetts

       House Sec. 412. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


         Sec. 426. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan

       House Sec. 429. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  Sec. 427. St. Clair Shores, Michigan

       Senate Sec. 104(cc). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


    Sec. 428. Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan, and Toledo Harbor, Ohio

       Senate Sec. 104(dd). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.

[[Page 20096]]




                Sec. 429. Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi

       Senate Sec. 104(ee). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                Sec. 430. Tunica Lake, Weir, Mississippi

       House Sec. 330, Senate Sec. 104(ff).--House recedes.


                  Sec. 431. Yellowstone River, Montana

       Senate Sec. 104(hh). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   Sec. 432. Las Vegas Valley, Nevada

       Senate Sec. 104(ii). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes with an amendment.


          Sec. 433. Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico

       House Sec. 413. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    Sec. 434. Cayuga Creek, New York

       House Sec. 414. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             Sec. 435. Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                 Sec. 436. Oswego River Basin, New York

       Senate Sec. 104(jj). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


               Sec. 437. White Oak River, North Carolina

       House Sec. 552. No comparable House or Senate section.--
     Senate recedes with an amendment.


            Sec. 438. Arcola Creek Watershed, Madison, Ohio

       House Sec. 415. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              Sec. 439. Cleveland Harbor, Cleveland, Ohio

       Senate Sec. 104(ll). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


           Sec. 440. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio

       House Sec. 553, Senate Sec. 104(nn).--House recedes.


     Sec. 441. Western Lake Erie Basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan

       House Sec. 416, Senate Sec. 225.--Senate recedes.


          Sec. 442. Schuylkill River, Norristown, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 417. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                 Sec. 443. South Carolina Coastal Areas

       Senate Sec. 104(rr). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


           Sec. 444. Santee Delta Focus Area, South Carolina

       House Sec. 427, Senate Sec. 104(oo).--House recedes.


                Sec. 445. Waccamaw River, South Carolina

       Senate Sec. 104(pp). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                   Sec. 446. Day County, South Dakota

       House Sec. 419. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       Sec. 447. Niobrara River and Missouri River, South Dakota

       Senate Sec. 104(ss). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                    Sec. 448. Corpus Christi, Texas

       House Sec. 420. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


        Sec. 449. Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney Fork Cut), Texas

       House Sec. 421. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              Sec. 450. Mouth of the Colorado River, Texas

       House Sec. 422. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   Sec. 451. Santa Clara River, Utah

       Senate Sec. 104(tt). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                 Sec. 452. Mount St. Helens, Washington

       Senate Sec. 104(uu). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


         Sec. 453. Kanawha River, Fayette County, West Virginia

       House Sec. 423. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     Sec. 454. West Virginia Ports

       House Sec. 424. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             Sec. 455. John Glenn Great Lakes Basin Program

       House Sec. 425, Senate Sec. 223.--House recedes with an 
     amendment.


               Sec. 456. Great Lakes Navigational System

       Senate Sec. 104(aaa). No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


  Sec. 457. Nutrient Loading Resulting from Dredged Material Disposal

       House Sec. 426. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


Sec. 458. Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers Levees and Streambanks 
                               Protection

       House Sec. 401. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.-


          Sec. 459. Upper Mississippi River Comprehensive Plan

       House Sec. 402, Senate Sec. 338.--House recedes with an 
     amendment.


          Sec. 460. Susquehanna River and Upper Chesapeake Bay

       No comparable House or Senate section.

                         Title V--Miscellaneous


              sec. 501. corps assumption of nrcs projects

     501(a) Llagas Creek, California. House Sec. 501(a), Senate 
         Sec. 101(a)(5).--Senate recedes.
     501(b) Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, Illinois. House 
         Sec. 501(b), Senate Sec. 102(b)(2).--House recedes.


                 Sec. 502. Environmental Infrastructure

       House Sec. 502 and Sec. 517. No comparable Senate 
     section.--Senate recedes with an amendment.


          Sec. 503. Contaminated Sediment Dredging Technology

       House Sec. 503, Senate Sec. 230.--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


                          Sec. 504. Dam Safety

       House Sec. 504. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


              Sec. 505. Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans

       House Sec. 505. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       Sec. 506. Projects for the improvement of the Environment

       House Sec. 506, Senate Sec. 224.--House recedes.


              Sec. 507. Maintenance of Navigation Channels

       House Sec. 507, Senate Sec. 104(s) and Sec. 104(v).--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


           Sec. 508. Measurement of Lake Michigan Diversions

       House Sec. 508, Senate Sec. 102(m).--House recedes.


   Sec. 509. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program

       House Sec. 509, Senate Sec. 314.--House recedes with an 
     amendment.


            Sec. 510. Atlantic Coast of New York Monitoring

       House Sec. 510, Senate Sec. 229.--House recedes.


                   Sec. 511. Water Control Management

       House Sec. 511. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              Sec. 512. Beneficial Use of Dredged Material

       House Sec. 512. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


              Sec. 513. Design and Construction Assistance

       House Sec. 513. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  Sec. 514. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers Enhancement Project

       House Sec. 514, Senate Sec. 210.--House recedes.


  Sec. 515. Irrigation Diversion Protection and Fisheries enhancement 
                               Assistance

       House Sec. 515, Senate Sec. 226.--House recedes with an 
     amendment.


      Sec. 516. Innovative Technologies for Watershed Restoration

       House Sec. 516. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


         Sec. 517. Expedited Consideration of Certain Projects.

       House Sec. 318, Sec. 518 and Sec. 574, Senate Sec. 307 and 
     Sec. 313.--Senate recedes with an amendment.


                      Sec. 518. Dog River, Alabama

       House Sec. 519. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


              Sec. 519. Levees in Elba and Geneva, Alabama

       House Sec. 520 and 521, Senate Sec. 333.--House recedes.


      Sec. 520. Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah

       House Sec. 522. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    Sec. 521. Beaver Lake, Arkansas

       House Sec. 524, Senate Sec. 102(c).--House recedes.


       Sec. 522. Beaver Lake Trout Production Facility, Arkansas

       House Sec. 525. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


               Sec. 523. Chino Dairy Preserve, California

       House Sec. 526. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


          Sec. 524. Orange and San Diego Counties, California

       House Sec. 528. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                Sec. 525. Rush Creek, Novato, California

       House Sec. 527. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                Sec. 526. Santa Cruz Harbor, California

       House Sec. 530. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


             Sec. 527. Lower St. Johns River Basin, Florida

       House Sec. 532. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


     Sec. 528. Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, Georgia

       House Sec. 534. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


    Sec. 529. Comprehensive Flood Impact Response Modeling System, 
          Coralville Reservoir and Iowa River Watershed, Iowa

       House Sec. 535, Senate Sec. 318.--House recedes with an 
     amendment.


        Sec. 530. Additional Construction Assistance in Illinois

       House Sec. 536. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    Sec. 531. Kanopolis Lake, Kansas

       House Sec. 537, Senate Sec. 324.--House recedes with an 
     amendment.

[[Page 20097]]




                Sec. 532. Southern and Eastern Kentucky

       House Sec. 538. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                     Sec. 533. Southeast Louisiana

       House Sec. 539. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.
       Because the Corps of Engineers has entered into project 
     cooperation agreements (PCA's) with respect to the projects 
     identified in the Southeast Louisiana Project Technical 
     Reports, dated April 1996, May 1996, and May 1996, the 
     conferees understand that these projects meet the 
     requirements of section 533(d) of WRDA 1996. This 
     determination could only be modified by a subsequent 
     determination made by the Chief of Engineers at his sole 
     discretion.


                    Sec. 534. Snug Harbor, Maryland

       House Sec. 540. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 Sec. 535. Welch Point, Elk River, Cecil County, and Chesapeake City, 
                                Maryland

       House Sec. 541. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


 Sec. 536. Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts

       House Sec. 544. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                     Sec. 537. St. Louis, Missouri

       House Sec. 545. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


        Sec. 538. Beaver Branch of Big Timber Creek, New Jersey

       House Sec. 546. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


  Sec. 539. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels, New York

       House Sec. 547. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


     Sec. 540. New York-New Jersey Harbor, New York and New Jersey

       House Sec. 548. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


       Sec. 541. Sea Gate Reach, Coney Island, New York, New York

       House Sec. 549. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                      Sec. 542. Woodlawn, New York

       House Sec. 550. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 Sec. 543. Floodplain Mapping, New York

       House Sec. 551. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


    Sec. 544. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ottawa County, Ohio

       House Sec. 553, Senate Sec. 104(nn).--Senate recedes.


                  Sec. 545. Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma

       House Sec. 554, Senate Sec. 312.--Senate recedes.
       The conferees understand the State of Oklahoma may use a 
     portion of the savings from the buy-out to reduce the loan 
     necessary to build a water distribution system for the 
     surrounding area residents. The conferees also understand 
     that the Sardis Lake Authority, the Choctaw Nation of 
     Oklahoma, and the State of Oklahoma may form an entity to 
     benefit equally from the sale of surplus water from the 
     appropriate agreed upon lake level of Sardis Lake.


              Sec. 546. Skinner Butte Park, Eugene, Oregon

       House Sec. 556. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                Sec. 547. Willamette River Basin, Oregon

       House Sec. 557, Senate Sec. 201(e)(7).--Senate recedes with 
     an amendment.


         Sec. 548. Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 558. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                  Sec. 549. Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 559. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


           Sec. 550. Point Marion Lock and Dam, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 560, Senate Sec. 305(d).--Senate recedes.


              Sec. 551. Seven Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 561. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                  Sec. 552. Southeastern Pennsylvania

       House Sec. 562. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


    Sec. 553. Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna, Pennsylvania, Watershed 
                    Management and Restoration Study

       House Sec. 563, Senate Sec. 104(qq).--House recedes.


                Sec. 554. Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico

       House Sec. 564. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


         Sec. 555. Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota, Study

       House Sec. 565. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


Sec. 556. North Padre Island Storm Drainage Reduction and Environmental 
                          Restoration Project

       House Sec. 569, Senate Sec. 323.--House recedes with an 
     amendment.
       The conferees understand the authorized project is 
     described in the Nueces County Commissioners Court report 
     dated March 31, 1997.


                    Sec. 557. Northern West Virginia

       House Sec. 570. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                 Sec. 558. Mississippi River Commission

       House Sec. 572, Senate Sec. 231.--Senate recedes.


              Sec. 559. Coastal Aquatic Habitat Management

       House Sec. 573. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


       Sec. 560. Abandoned and Inactive Noncoal Mine Restoration

       House Sec. 575. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


             Sec. 561. Beneficial Use of Waste Tire Rubber

       House Sec. 576. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                       Sec. 562. Site Designation

       House Sec. 577. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                       Sec. 563. Land Conveyances

       House Sec. 578, Senate Sec. 334, Sec. 320, Sec. 102(q), 
     Sec. 102(r), Sec. 339, Sec. 340.--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


                   Sec. 564. McNary Pool, Washington

       Senate Sec. 339. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes with an amendment.


                           Sec. 565. Namings

       House Sec. 579, Senate Sec. 308.--Senate recedes with an 
     amendment.


Sec. 566. Folsom Dam and Reservoir Additional Storage and Water Supply 
                                Studies.

       House Sec. 580. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                   Sec. 567. Wallops Island, Virginia

       House Sec. 581. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


               Sec. 568. Detroit River, Detroit, Michigan

       House Sec. 582, Senate Sec. 104(bb).--Senate recedes with 
     an amendment.


                    Sec. 569. Northeastern Minnesota

       House Sec. 583. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                            Sec. 570. Alaska

       House Sec. 584. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    Sec. 571. Central West Virginia

       House Sec. 585. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


     Sec. 572. Sacramento Metropolitan Area Watershed Restoration, 
                              California.

       House Sec. 586. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                        Sec. 573. Onondaga Lake

       House Sec. 587. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


                Sec. 574. East Lynn Lake, West Virginia

       House Sec. 588. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                    Sec. 575. Eel River, California

       House Sec. 589. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


                 Sec. 576. North Little Rock, Arkansas

       House Sec. 590. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes with an amendment.


    Sec. 577. Upper Mississippi River, Mississippi Place, St. Paul, 
                               Minnesota

       House Sec. 591. No comparable Senate section.--Senate 
     recedes.


     Sec. 578. Dredging of Salt Ponds in the State of Rhode Island.

       Senate Sec. 301. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


            Sec. 579. Susquehanna River Basin, Pennsylvania

       Senate Sec. 302. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


        Sec. 580. Cumberland, Maryland, Flood Project Mitigation

       Senate Sec. 310. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                 Sec. 581. City of Miami Beach, Florida

       Senate Sec. 311. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


   Sec. 582. Research and Development Program for Columbia and Snake 
                         Rivers Salmon Survival

       Senate Sec. 315. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


              Sec. 583. Larkspur Ferry Channel, California

       Senate Sec. 317. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


           Sec. 584. Holes Creek Flood Control Project, Ohio

       Senate Sec. 328. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


         Sec. 585. San Jacinto Disposal Area, Galveston, Texas

       Senate Sec. 335. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes with an amendment.


                   Sec. 586. Water Monitoring Station

       Senate Sec. 337. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


          Sec. 587. Overflow Management Facility, Rhode Island

       Senate Sec. 329. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes.


                  Sec. 588. Lower Chena River, Alaska

       No comparable House or Senate section.


               Sec. 589. Numana Dam Fish Passage, Nevada

       No comparable House or Senate section.

[[Page 20098]]




                     Sec. 590. Embrey Dam, Virginia

       No comparable House or Senate section.


       Sec. 591. Environmental Remediation, Front Royal, Virginia

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                         Sec. 592. Mississippi

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                      Sec. 593. Central New Mexico

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                             Sec. 594. Ohio

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                   Sec. 595. Rural Nevada and Montana

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                       Sec. 596. Phoenix, Arizona

       No comparable House or Senate section.


                  Sec. 597. National Harbor, Maryland

       No comparable House or Senate section.

  Title VI. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and 
    State of South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration.

       Senate Sec. 401. No comparable House section.--House 
     recedes with an amendment.
     Miscellaneous


                       Passaic River, New Jersey

       House Sec. 337. No comparable Senate section.--House 
     recedes to Senate.
       The conferees understand that the Transportation Equity Act 
     for the 21st Century (P.L. 105-206) included funding for the 
     design and construction of a facility for safe pedestrian 
     access, specifically an esplanade in the vicinity of Joseph 
     G. Minish Waterfront Park, Newark, New Jersey. The conferees 
     understand it is the intent of the local proponents that the 
     esplanade is to have an overall width of 600 feet. The 
     conferees encourage the Corps of Engineers to provide 
     appropriate technical assistance in the planning of such 
     project to ensure its coordination with existing Corps' 
     projects and activities along the Passaic River.

     Bud Shuster,
     Don Young,
     Sherwood Boehlert,
     Richard H. Baker,
     John T. Doolittle,
     Don Sherwood,
     James L. Oberstar,
     Robert A. Borski,
     Ellen Tauscher,
     Brian Baird,
                                Managers on the Part of the House.

     John H. Chafee,
     John Warner,
     Bob Smith,
     George V. Voinovich,
     Max Baucus,
     Daniel Moynihan,
     Managers on the Part of the Senate.

                          ____________________