[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 144 (Monday, September 14, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H5557-H5559]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




              ILLEGAL RED SNAPPER AND TUNA ENFORCEMENT ACT

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (S. 283) to require the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards 
and Technology and the Administrator of National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration to develop a standard methodology for 
identifying the country of origin of seafood to support enforcement 
against illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, and for other 
purposes, as amended.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                                 S. 283

         Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives 
     of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

         This Act may be cited as the ``Illegal Red Snapper and 
     Tuna Enforcement Act''.

     SEC. 2. METHODOLOGY FOR IDENTIFYING COUNTRY OF ORIGIN OF 
                   SEAFOOD.

         (a) Definitions.--In this section:
         (1) Administrator.--The term ``Administrator'' means the 
     Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
     Administration.
         (2) Appropriate committees of congress.--The term 
     ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means--

[[Page H5558]]

         (A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
     Transportation of the Senate; and
         (B) the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the 
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the 
     Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 
     Representatives.
         (3) Illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing; iuu 
     fishing.--The terms ``illegal, unreported, or unregulated 
     fishing'' and ``IUU fishing'' mean ``illegal, unreported, or 
     unregulated fishing'' as such term is defined for purposes of 
     section 609(e) of the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium 
     Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 1826j(e)).
         (4) Key agency leadership.--The term ``key agency 
     leadership'' means the Administrator and the Under Secretary, 
     in consultation with the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and 
     Border Protection and the Commandant of the Coast Guard.
         (5) Red snapper.--The term ``red snapper'' means the 
     species Lutjanus campechanus.
         (6) Tuna.--The term ``tuna'' means the following species 
     of tuna:
         (A) Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus).
         (B) Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares).
         (C) Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus).
         (7) Under secretary.--The term ``Under Secretary'' means 
     the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology.
         (b) Standard Methodology for Identification.--
         (1) In general.--Key agency leadership shall jointly 
     develop a standard methodology, based on chemical analysis, 
     for identifying the country of origin of seafood to support 
     enforcement against IUU fishing and seafood fraud.
         (2) Requirements.--Key agency leadership shall ensure 
     that the methodology developed under this subsection--
         (A) is consistent with the needs of Federal and State law 
     enforcement agencies in combating IUU fishing and seafood 
     fraud;
         (B) minimizes processing time;
         (C) involves the use of a field kit that can be easily 
     carried by one individual; and
         (D) to the extent practicable, can be used to test 
     prepared food, including raw preparations of seafood, such as 
     ceviche, sashimi, sushi, and poke.
         (3) Initial species for identification.--In developing 
     the methodology under this subsection, key agency leadership 
     shall conduct pilot studies on red snapper, as an example of 
     a stationary stock, and tuna, as an example of a highly 
     migratory stock.
         (c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit to 
     the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes 
     the following:
         (1) A summary of the methodology developed under 
     subsection (b).
         (2) A plan for operationalizing such methodology.
         (3) If the Under Secretary determines any aspect of such 
     methodology is impractical, an explanation relating thereto, 
     whether additional research would make developing such a 
     methodology practicable, and whether a different approach 
     other than chemical analysis might be practicable.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentlewoman from Oregon (Ms. Hoyle) 
each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.


                             general leave

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and 
include extraneous material on S. 283, the bill now under 
consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Arkansas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of S. 283, the Illegal Red Snapper and 
Tuna Enforcement Act, sponsored by Senator Ted Cruz from Texas.
  This legislation would direct the Under Secretary of Commerce for 
Standards and Technology and the NOAA Administrator to jointly develop 
a standard methodology, based on chemical analysis, for identifying the 
country of origin of seafood products to support enforcement against 
illegal, unregulated, or unreported fishing, otherwise known as IUU 
fishing.
  IUU fishing undermines the sustainability of the seafood supply chain 
and the United States' leadership as a gold standard for fisheries 
management. This bill will promote innovation to help keep IUU products 
out of American markets.
  I thank Representative Brian Babin from Texas, a sponsor of companion 
legislation, for his leadership on this issue in the House of 
Representatives.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support S. 283, and I reserve 
the balance of my time.
  Ms. HOYLE of Oregon. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, or IUU 
fishing, threatens domestic fisheries and ecosystems around the world.
  In the United States, up to 32 percent of seafood imports are derived 
from IUU fishing. These illegal practices harm our economy, 
disadvantage fishermen, and threaten the long-term health of our oceans 
and fish stocks.
  Mr. Speaker, S. 283 would address one part of that challenge by 
investing in science to improve the detection of illegally sourced 
seafood. This bill would direct the National Institute of Standards and 
Technology and NOAA to develop a chemical analysis to identify the 
origin of seafood. If successful, this could assist law enforcement in 
identifying products from illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing.
  This legislation specifically focuses on red snapper and several 
species of tuna, offering an opportunity to determine whether the 
chemical analysis research would apply to reef fish and migratory 
species. This is a practical, bipartisan piece of legislation that 
would strengthen our ability to identify seafood linked to IUU fishing 
and improve enforcement efforts.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting S. 283, 
and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Texas (Mr. Babin), the lead sponsor of the House companion to this bill 
and chairman of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee.
  Mr. BABIN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman for yielding me time.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of S. 283, the Illegal Red 
Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act, as amended.
  This bill directs the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to develop a 
standard methodology using chemical analysis to identify the country of 
origin of seafood.
  Both commercial and recreational fishing contribute significantly to 
the Texas economy. Red snapper, in particular, is highly sought after 
by the recreational fishing sector. This effort is especially important 
in the Gulf of America, where red snapper is a valuable resource for 
American fishermen and coastal communities.
  Illegally harvested seafood can make its way into U.S. markets, 
undercutting the fishermen and seafood producers who play by the rules.

                              {time}  1530

  NIST scientists have developed chemical methods to identify the 
geographic origin of foods like beef, honey, fruits, and rice. This 
bill would build on that expertise to give law enforcement another tool 
to combat illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing and seafood 
fraud.
  Today's bill also incorporates edits made by the House Science, 
Space, and Technology Committee during our bipartisan markup earlier 
this year as part of H.R. 3706, the Standards for Understanding Source 
and Habitat Identification Act, also known as the SUSHI Act, which I 
sponsored.
  I urge my colleagues to support this important legislation.
  Ms. HOYLE of Oregon. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the 
legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, again, S. 283 supports the development of 
new technology that can help identify and cut off IUU fish products 
entering our markets.
  I greatly appreciate Senator Cruz and Representative Babin for their 
leadership on this legislation. I urge the passage of S. 283 and yield 
back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House suspend the 
rules and pass the bill, S. 283, as amended.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

[[Page H5559]]

  

                          ____________________