[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 120 (Wednesday, July 22, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4211-S4212]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                 Unanimous Consent Request--S. Res. 811

  Mr. HOEVEN. Mr. President, I rise today to highlight and ask 
unanimous consent to pass a resolution I introduced to call for greater 
action from the Canadian Government to fight the almost annual 
wildfires that send smoke over the border, blanketing much of the 
United States.
  Over the past several days, more than 100 million people nationwide 
have been under air quality alerts due to the smoke from Canadian 
wildfires. This smoke has real impacts to the health and well-being of 
individuals and families. In my home State of North Dakota, this is an 
issue we are very familiar with. Unfortunately, over the past number of 
summers, we have been experiencing hazy skies from wildfires in Canada.
  The United States and Canada have a longstanding and close 
relationship based on our shared values and common interests. I know; I 
grew up 50 miles from the border. But with that shared border between 
the United States and Canada, we need to manage it to the benefit of 
the people that reside in both countries. I mean, we have water that 
flows up into Canada, and we are always working on water quality issues 
and all those kinds of things. We understand that what we do here in 
the United States affects our friends in Canada as well.
  So we feel for those in Canada whose homes and communities are 
directly impacted by the fires. We also recognize and thank the 
thousands of firefighters and emergency responders who are working to 
combat wildfires and protect lives and personal property under 
dangerous conditions.
  But at the same time, we need responsible forest management, 
including hazardous fuels reduction, timber harvesting, grazing, and 
other forest restoration practices that help reduce the severity and 
frequency of catastrophic wildfires.
  With more than 3,640 wildfires in Canada this year alone, it is clear 
that more action needs to be taken to prevent and stop these fires. 
And, in fact, in the United States, we have worked many years to help 
our friends in Canada battle these fires, but, clearly, more action 
needs to be taken.
  So the resolution I have introduced does three things: Specifically, 
it recognizes the significant impact that smoke from the Canadian 
wildfires has on the safety, health, and well-being of the American 
people, and it calls upon the Government of Canada to take 
responsibility for the cross-border impact of these wildfires, 
including immediate efforts to extinguish the fires and prevent their 
reoccurrence. And finally, the resolution urges President Trump to 
further discuss with Canadian Prime Minister Carney the importance of 
extinguishing these fires and finding ways to prevent their 
reoccurrence, something that we can do together and we should do 
together for the mutual benefit of both our great countries.
  So with that, as if in legislative session and notwithstanding rule 
XXII, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the 
consideration of S. Res. 811, which is at the desk. I further ask that 
the resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, and that the 
motions to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with 
no intervening action or debate.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  The Senator from Washington.
  Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, reserving the right to object. I am going 
to ask pretty bluntly, what on earth are my colleagues doing here? I 
don't know why Republicans are focused on making a really petty and 
offensive statement to Canada, saying they need to do a better job of 
containing wildfire smoke as if the Canadian Government is letting 
their forest burn and its own citizens inhale wildfire smoke just to 
spite us. This is a joke. Maybe my colleagues across the aisle don't 
realize this, but Canadian firefighters cross that border to help us 
fight our wildfires right here all the time.
  And guess what. Our firefighters do the exact same when they are 
able. In fact, for the information of all Senators, a firefighter 
actually just passed away who was helping us fight a wildfire in 
Colorado; he was from British Columbia.
  Now, what we don't do is pass resolutions here telling our friends 
and our neighbors to do a better job of handling wildfire smoke.
  And also, maybe somebody should alert the President and my 
colleagues, but wildfire smoke from the United States often makes its 
way into Canada. It is happening right now where wildfires are burning 
in Oregon and in Washington.

[[Page S4212]]

  I think what this might be really about is telling Trump that, Mr. 
President, look how much we agree with you.
  This is a waste of everybody's time. So, respectfully, to my 
colleagues, understanding that time on the Senate floor is precious, 
here are my suggestions: Maybe we should pass legislation to rehire all 
of the red card holders that Trump fired. Those are the Forest Service 
employees who are trained here to help fight wildfires.
  Or how about we pass legislation to stop the Trump administration's 
so-called reorganization of the Forest Service, which would actually 
shutter offices across our country, including the research labs that 
helped us study the wildfires and pushed out even more Forest Service 
employees.
  Or maybe instead of entertaining Trump's outrageous requests for a 
$1.5 trillion war budget, Republicans could work with us to adequately 
fund our needs here at home.
  Our Forest Service, right here in the United States, is understaffed 
and underresourced. Maybe my colleagues don't realize it, but Trump's 
chaotic funding cuts and freezes, along with the chaotic mass layoffs, 
have actually hurt our public lands and leave us here less prepared to 
prevent and respond to wildfires here at home.
  I remember speaking with a Forest Service ranger last year. He was a 
longtime dedicated employee. He was a former marine. He served our 
country in more ways than one, and he did an incredible job. He 
literally saved people's lives on forest trails, and he fought 
wildfires here and even saved a small rural town in my State from being 
burned to the ground. Know what happened to him? Trump and DOGE fired 
him. No cause, just fired him. That was a huge loss for our State and 
for our country.
  So I do want my colleagues to get serious about the wildfires. And I 
will just say this, the President should actually apologize to our 
Canadian neighbors for the many threats and insults and, of course, 
drop those absurd tariffs he is imposing on these wildfires. I am not 
holding my breath, so enough with gimmicks, Mr. President. You want to 
work together to prevent wildfires? My door is wide open, and I hope we 
can all work together to do that.
  But I will tell you what I am not going to do: insult our Canadian 
friends to suck up to a President who does nothing but threaten our 
neighbors.

  Thank you, Mr. President, I object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
  Mr. HOEVEN. Mr. President, if I could, I am wondering if my colleague 
heard the speech I just gave. I guess I want to repeat it because maybe 
she might have missed it.
  The United States and Canada--this is what I said, so I can't think 
of a bigger mischaracterization of what I just said. And I am not even 
sure why. If she wanted to come down and criticize our President, that 
is fine. She can do that, I guess, whenever she wants if that is what 
she wants to do. But to completely mischaracterize what I said, I don't 
think is fair.
  So I am going to reiterate what I said just a minute ago for the 
record.

       The United States and Canada have a longstanding and close 
     relationship based on our shared values and common interests.

  I even referenced the fact that I grew up 50 miles from the Canadian 
border. I went back and forth to Canada so many times I couldn't even 
count.
  But, and I go on, with a shared border between the United States and 
Canada, we want to manage it to the benefit of people residing in both 
countries.

       We feel for those in Canada whose homes and communities are 
     directly impacted.

  I am reading from the speech I just wrote; I was listening to the 
mischaracterization.

       We also recognize and thank the thousands of firefighters 
     and emergency responders who are working to combat wildfires 
     and protect lives and personal property under dangerous 
     conditions.
       At the same time, we need responsible forest management, 
     including hazardous fuels reduction, timber harvesting, 
     grazing, and other forest restoration practices that help 
     reduce the severity and the frequency of catastrophic 
     wildfires.
       With more than 3,640 wildfires in Canada this year alone, 
     it is clear that more action needs to be taken to prevent and 
     stop these fires.

  That is what I am calling for. And in the resolution itself, I make 
it very clear that this is something that is important to benefit both 
countries.
  So, again, you know, I think it would be--if my colleague wants to 
object, I understand she has that right. But I think it is unfair to 
characterize that other than I am saying we need more action on these 
wildfires.
  Now, if she feels we don't need more action on these wildfires, it is 
just fine, OK. But she shouldn't misrepresent what I am trying to do, 
which is call attention to the fact that we need more work done so we 
can avoid these wildfires in the future and that that is something that 
is mutually beneficial for both of our Nations.
  And with that, I would yield the floor to my colleague the good 
Senator from Ohio.
  Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, if I could respond quickly. If the 
Senator would just let me respond quickly before you pass it on.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Washington.
  Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, let me just say to my friend, and he is a 
friend, and I do hear his quiet, calm tone. I appreciate it. It is not 
something we all often hear here. But I will say this, in the words 
that you hear from this resolution, if you are a Canadian, it is that 
we are insulting them by saying you are not trying to fight your forest 
fires.
  And I will tell you this, I am working my tail off to help us fight 
our wildfires; our Canadian friends are as well. And I think, in this 
very heightened time--when I know I don't live far from the border 
either; we have a lot of trade with our Canadian friends; we go back 
and forth--they feel very insulted by a lot that is going on. So I 
think this adds fuel to that fire.
  So what I say to my friend, let's work on our country, making sure 
that we are fighting our forest fires, which I outlined in my response 
to you, of some of the things we can do, and I believe that our 
Canadian friends are doing the same. But that is why I object at this 
time.
  Mr. HOEVEN. And to my colleague from Washington, we work together on 
many things, important things. I appreciate that. I think we both come 
from border States and recognize the importance of this incredible bond 
and relationship that we have with our friends in Canada, and I want to 
make clear, I have tremendous respect, appreciation, and admiration for 
our friends and allies and that this is about working together for 
mutual benefit.
  And with that, I would yield to my good friend and colleague from the 
State of Ohio.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Banks). The Senator from Ohio.
  Mr. MORENO. Mr. President, very briefly, let me make a couple of 
things clear. This resolution isn't about insulting Canadians; this 
resolution is about calling out inept leaders in Canada. I have total 
and complete respect for the people of Canada. Unfortunately, they are 
victimized by terrible leaders.
  To just turn a blind eye to the fact that they just dumped in your 
State and my State the equivalent of a year's worth of auto pollution 
in America, on the Midwest, and pretend it isn't manmade--they don't 
have centralized response.
  This idea that they helped us is totally false. They charge us to 
come to the United States to help put out our forest fires that, by the 
way, are also created by ineptitude in Washington, Oregon, and 
California. And then when our firefighters ask to go to Canada to help 
them, they prevent them from coming in.
  So this is completely a manmade disaster, but it is not made by the 
people of Canada; it is made by the leaders of Canada. And shame on 
them, and shame on anybody apologizing for what they are doing to the 
people of our States.