[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 115 (Wednesday, July 15, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4101-S4102]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                 Unanimous Consent Request--S. Res. 556

  Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, climate change is real. Simple 
proposition. Earlier this year, I came to the floor and asked my 
colleagues if they could all agree on that simple factual proposition. 
Well, they could not, so I return to the floor in hopes that our 
Republican colleagues could at least agree to some of the simple truths 
that make up the larger truth of climate change.
  I asked if we could agree, for instance, that sea levels are rising 
as a consequence. There is really no dispute about that, but 
Republicans objected.
  I asked if we could agree that the oceans are warming as a 
consequence. There is really no dispute about that either. In fact, 
they are warming by about 20 zettajoules a year. Nevertheless, 
Republicans still objected.
  So I shifted my focus to economic threats. I asked if we could agree 
that climate change is driving up the cost of homeowners insurance or 
that it threatens home values. Very clear propositions demonstrated in 
real life. But, again, Republicans objected.
  Well, the closer these threats are to your home, the harder they 
become to deny. So let me try a narrower simple truth today: Florida's 
insurance market is gravely stressed by climate risks. That is it. Can 
we all agree on that?
  I have explained many times that climate change is driving an 
increase in severe storms, including hurricanes. This chart tracks 
billion-dollar climate disasters in the United States between 1980 and 
today. The pattern is crystal clear. As you can see, these events and 
their costs are increasing.
  According to NOAA, of all the climate-driven disasters since 1980, 
hurricanes have caused the most damage--over $1.5 trillion total adding 
all that up--with an average cost of $23 billion per event.
  And hurricanes hit southeastern States--particularly Florida--the 
hardest. Between 2020 and 2024, nine hurricanes hit Florida causing 
$244 billion in damages in Florida alone. They went on often to create 
more damage in other States--but $244 billion in Florida.
  So what does the data show is happening in Florida insurance markets 
as a result? First, data I collected as chair of the Senate Budget 
Committee shows that Florida has, by far, the highest insurance 
nonrenewal rate in the country--that is the rate at which insurers say 
to their customer: I am sorry. I know you have been a good customer. We 
have been insuring you for years, but your property is now so 
endangered that we can no longer insure you. We are done. You have got 
to go find new insurance.
  Florida: Highest nonrenewal rate in the country.
  Second, Florida has, by far, the highest average premiums in the 
country--by some estimates, approaching $14,000 per year. Economists 
expect these costs to continue to rise.
  This chart predicts future insurance rate increases as high as 300 
percent in coastal Florida in the next 30 years--the period of a 
mortgage entered into today. Just do some quick math. If it is $14,000 
now, a 300 percent increase, four times as much, you add--call it a 
$56,000 annual expense to own a home, and you run a present value of 
that simple math, that all comes off the value of the home.
  Even at these high premium rates, many home insurers in Florida are 
at risk of insolvency. After catastrophic hurricane losses in recent 
years, many of the major insurers--including Farmers, Progressive, and 
AAA--all left the Florida market entirely leaving behind small, local, 
and less stable insurers. Many of those small, local, and less stable 
insurers have gone bust when claims come in. This insurance problem 
creates a mortgage problem in Florida. Banks won't finance a home 
mortgage unless the home is protected by insurance.

  When banks originate mortgages, they often flip them to government-

[[Page S4102]]

sponsored entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. So, a new problem: 
Fannie and Freddie will only purchase mortgages which are protected by 
an insurer and only if that insurer has a requisite financial stability 
rating. Well, to obtain a financial stability rating, insurers pay a 
rating agency.
  Given the insolvency risk in the Florida insurance market, how do 
insurance companies there obtain the stability rating required by 
Fannie and Freddie? Most go to an operation called Demotech. Mark my 
words, you will hear a lot more about Demotech as this situation 
worsens. Demotech has rated nearly all of these small, local companies 
that it covers ``A'' or above. Well, it turns out these ratings are too 
good to be true.
  A recent investigation by the Wall Street Journal found that insurers 
rated by Demotech are 30 times more likely--30 times more likely--to 
become insolvent than those graded by other rating companies. So if 
Fannie and Freddie were to stop accepting mortgages with a high-risk 
Demotech-rated insurer, the Florida real estate market would come to a 
shuddering halt.
  This is the share of the insurance market in Florida rated by 
Demotech. This is what is left of the traditional ratings, and this is 
Citizens Property Insurance, which, because it is State-backed, doesn't 
require ratings. It has its own separate problems.
  But this Demotech problem is real. Almost 20 percent of Demotech-
rated insurers in Florida have gone insolvent in the last decade--20 
percent; 1 in 5, gone. An insolvent insurer is, of course, a disaster 
for homeowners who have to wait, eventually, to be paid by a State-run 
organization--the guaranty fund--that takes over for the failed, 
insolvent insurance.
  Well, two problems result from that. One, the delay in paying claims 
destroys neighborhoods. It is great to get paid by your insurance 
company when you have a major claim and your house is wrecked, but if 
the money doesn't come soon, you can't rebuild and the neighborhood 
doesn't come back. And we see that in Florida now. Two, other 
Floridians are on the hook for all those claims. The guaranty fund 
transmits that cost to other Florida policyholders.
  Now, Citizens Property Insurance--this one--the State-backed insurer 
of last resort, has a similar backstop when it can't pay claims, but in 
real life, those levees to prop up Citizens are often going to be 
uncollectible. There are credible scenarios in which the losses of 
Citizens Property Insurance exceed its ability to pay claims, and the 
assessment scheme fails. Those are plausible scenarios.
  Well, to defend, Citizens engages in periodic depopulation efforts 
where it hands off to those same popup, politically connected, 
Demotech-rated local insurers tens and sometimes hundreds of thousands 
of homeowners. Boom--the homeowner is dumped into an insurance company 
she has never heard of.
  It is a cascade happening. The climate crisis clobbers home values, 
drives up insurance prices, and causes insurance insolvency in climate-
risky areas across the country but nowhere so more than Florida.
  This is a crisis for families in Florida. The human stories behind 
this are heartbreaking, and it is growing into a crisis for all of us. 
Florida's insurance market is the canary in the American climate risk 
coal mine. As climate change gets worse and risks spread, other States 
will find themselves in a similar position--my own, being a coastal 
State, amongst them.
  So can we all agree on this simple truth: that Florida's insurance 
market is gravely stressed by climate risks?
  Mr. President, as if in legislative session, I ask unanimous consent 
that the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs be discharged 
and the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of that 
proposition, S. Res. 556; further, that the resolution be agreed to, 
the preamble be agreed to, and the motions to reconsider be considered 
made and laid upon the table.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  The Senator from Indiana.
  Mr. BANKS. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, it is pretty 
clear that this resolution is an attack on a red State by one of my 
colleagues from a blue State.
  I respect my colleague, but this resolution doesn't pass muster. In 
fact, we know that the radical, Green New Deal agenda that was wrought 
on us in this country by the Biden administration raised gas prices in 
this country to astronomical rates, made life less affordable and more 
difficult for Americans all over this country. That is why they quickly 
turned the page on those policies and got rid of Biden and those 
radical Green New Deal policies and chose President Trump to come back 
to the White House.
  We had really good news this week. Inflation rates came way down--
down as much as we have seen it in many years--because of President 
Trump's policies to uproot Green New Deal policies, passing the Working 
Families Tax Cut bill that we passed that makes life more affordable 
for working families all over this the country.
  It is pretty clear that this resolution is just a veiled attack on 
Florida.
  I am not from Florida. Florida is a good State. And I love the State 
of Rhode Island. I did all of my Navy training there. I respect my 
colleague. It is ironic with this resolution because 2 percent of Rhode 
Islanders over the last 5 years have moved to Florida, and they moved 
to Florida especially after the pandemic--all of the mandates and 
higher taxes, and they are choosing a State that works, that is 
attracting them, just like people from all over the coast are moving to 
Florida because they like Florida, they like lower taxes, and they like 
the quality of life that Florida offers.
  This resolution is just an attack on Florida.
  I do invite my colleague--again, whom I respect and enjoy working 
with--to come to the Banking Committee. Let's work on bipartisan 
solutions and ideas to bring down the cost of living for all Americans. 
We can do that together. We can find solutions to do that. This 
resolution doesn't do that.
  Mr. President, that is why I object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
  The Senator from Rhode Island.
  Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, I appreciate my fine colleague from 
Indiana State whose Indiana University teaches the science of climate 
change. But I would like to say that this is not an attack on Florida; 
this is a warning to Florida of what is happening, what is already 
demonstrably beginning to happen as a result of sea level rise, worse 
hurricanes, and heavier storm bursts. I just want to make sure that 
characterization is clear. Florida is entitled to be warned about this 
risk. It is a risk we all share.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Ohio.

                          ____________________