[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 24, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3169-S3170]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, today, we mark 4 years since the Supreme
Court's Dobbs decision, the landmark Supreme Court decision overturning
Roe v. Wade and returning the question of abortion to the people and
their elected representatives.
Roe was, quite simply, terrible constitutional law--a fact that has
been acknowledged by legal scholars across the political spectrum--and
the Dobbs decision reversed this decades-old error and made it clear
that Roe's supposed constitutional right to an abortion simply didn't
exist.
I am proud to have fought, along with my Republican colleagues, to
put
[[Page S3170]]
Justices on the Supreme Court who focus on interpreting the law and the
Constitution, instead of creating new constitutional law out of thin
air, as the Justices did in Roe.
It is fitting that the Dobbs decision occurs close to our Nation's
birthday, July 4, the anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of
Independence. As we prepare to celebrate the 250th birthday of the
declaration--the 250th birthday of our country--the proximity of these
two anniversaries has been on my mind.
The declaration lays out the fundamental principles underlying our
system of government, and no lines are more important than these:
We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
``That among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.''
``Unalienable rights''--rights given by God, rights that come before
government and that government is required to protect.
``All Men are created equal . . . [and] endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights.''
As our country knows, to its sorrow, we haven't always lived up to
the principles of the declaration, and the sad truth is that, when it
comes to unborn Americans, we are failing to live up to those
principles today because, in State after State around this country, it
is legal to kill unborn human beings--unborn Americans--in some cases,
up until the point of birth--up until the point of birth.
These babies--these human beings--will never have a chance to enjoy
the rest of their unalienable rights because they are denied their most
fundamental right while they are still in their infancy.
This is not, of course, something you will hear from my Democrat
colleagues when they attempt to defend abortion. You won't hear about
the baby whose rights are at stake.
In fact, my Democrat colleagues do everything they can to obscure the
baby in this debate. They mention women and ``healthcare'' and
``reproductive freedom,'' as if killing an innocent person could ever,
ever be something we are free to do.
And they never mention the other person in question, which is the
unborn human being who was sacrificed in every abortion--probably
because they know, at some level, that supporting the killing of an
innocent human being is indefensible and completely incompatible with
our Nation's creed.
And let's be very clear here. When we talk about abortion, we are
talking about the killing of a human being. Everyone knows this. Even
my Democratic colleagues know this, although they might like to gloss
over the fact.
You don't even need to have seen a baby kicking her feet and sucking
her thumb on an ultrasound to know that she is human because human moms
and human dads have other human beings. That is Biology 101.
No, the question isn't whether the unborn baby is a human being. The
question is whether we value that human being, whether we really
believe our American creed.
We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all [--all--]
Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life. .
. .
Do we really believe that, or do we believe that it is OK to say that
some human beings are more important than others, that some human
beings can be sacrificed for others?
I would hope history has taught us it is a very dangerous thing to
say that some groups of human beings are not worthy of protection.
I am proud to be from a State that has extended the full protection
of the law to unborn human beings, that has recognized that unborn
Americans are also created equal and endowed by their Creator with
unalienable rights.
I am proud to have supported, sponsored, and cosponsored pro-life
legislation here in Congress.
The overturning of Roe has opened the door to substantive pro-life
legislation, and Republicans in Congress are going to keep up the fight
for real protections for unborn Americans.
I am very proud that with the Working Families Tax Cut, Congress
enacted the first pro-life law in decades. Thanks to Republicans'
landmark legislation this year, some of the Nation's largest abortion
providers, including Planned Parenthood, were prohibited from receiving
Federal Medicaid funding.
Organizations that have turned the killing of babies into a business
were cut off from this source of taxpayer dollars.
The Dobbs decision was a landmark decision because it opened the door
for full protection of the unalienable rights of unborn Americans, but
there is a lot more work to be done.
The Democrat Party fights tooth and nail to ensure that even the most
commonsense measures--like measures to protect babies who survive
abortions or to ensure that pregnant college students are aware that
they have alternatives to abortion--do not make it through Congress.
And, currently, mail-order abortion drugs are flooding into States in
defiance of the law--thanks to the Biden administration's decision to
loosen restrictions on these drugs--despite the fact that they pose a
danger to women, as well as obviously to the babies.
So as I said, the fight to protect the right to life for all
Americans continues, and I and my Republican colleagues will continue
to do everything we can here in Congress to support moms and to protect
babies.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all--[all]--
men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
May the day soon come when we fully live up to that creed.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.