[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 101 (Tuesday, June 16, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2803-S2804]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                                  FISA

  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, when it comes to fraud, there is no excuse 
for it, but let's not overstate the obvious. Government Agencies across 
this country are doing the best they can in some instances but can 
always do better.
  I don't think that we have a monopoly when it comes to virtue in our 
party or any other party. There are those who break the law and should 
be held accountable, and there are those who are doing their best to 
uphold the law, and they should be encouraged. To suggest that the 
Democrats are the party of fraud and the Republicans are the party of 
virtue--you know better than that. People in both political parties 
could have a tuneup when it comes to virtue, and I add myself to that 
list as well.
  Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, is 
a powerful tool for collecting information that has been abused for way 
too long. Most Americans would flunk the test of, what is FISA? what is 
702?
  Here is what it boils down to: We approve, under law 702, allowing 
our intelligence Agencies to collect the private communications of 
foreigners overseas without a warrant. Why? We suspect those foreigners 
are involved in activity that is not safe for the United States. Am I 
supportive of that? Count me in.
  But section 702 enables surveillance of more than just foreigners 
overseas; millions of innocent Americans' texts, emails, and phone 
calls are swept up in this dragnet if they communicated with a 
foreigner. So if you find somebody in a foreign country whom you 
suspect of illegal or dangerous activity and you wiretap their 
telephone communication, the person on the other end of the phone may 
not be a foreigner but an American citizen.
  Unfortunately, it turns out that thousands and thousands of American 
citizens have their texts and phone conversations tapped under section 
702. Our intelligence Agencies, including the Federal Bureau of 
Investigations, puts these communications in searchable databases that 
they use to spy on Americans without a warrant.
  The independent Privacy and Civil Liberties Board and the FISA Court 
have documented shocking abuses of section 702 by our own government 
intelligence Agencies. And 702 has been used to spy on American 
religious leaders, American political parties, American journalists, 
and protestors from across the political spectrum. Such abuses have 
been documented under both Democrats and Republicans.
  But the prospect of placing warrantless--that means no court approval 
ahead of time--surveillance power in the hands of this administration 
is particularly alarming. President Trump and his appointees have 
repeatedly weaponized the power of the Federal Government to target 
President Trump's perceived enemies.
  Take Bill Pulte, President Trump's first choice to serve as the 
Acting Director of National Intelligence. Pulte currently serves as the 
Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, where he has pushed for 
criminal referrals against those who have angered President Trump, from 
New York attorney general Letitia James to Federal Reserve Governor 
Lisa Cook.
  Even though Pulte himself has no--no--intelligence experience, 
President Trump chose him to lead our national intelligence apparatus 
and to help oversee that powerful section 702. The public outcry 
changed the President's mind. The President, after he heard from both 
Democrats and Republicans what a terrible choice Pulte would be, 
dropped him and now has nominated Jay Clayton, U.S. attorney for the 
Southern District of New York, to serve as Director of National 
Intelligence.
  This episode demonstrates the inherent danger of warrantless 
surveillance. No single branch of government in the United States 
should have unchecked power to spy on Americans, whether this power is 
in the hands of Bill Pulte; Jay Clayton; Kash Patel, the leader of the 
FBI; or whoever President Trump installs next.
  Repeated efforts to rein in the abuses of section 702 with minimal 
reforms have failed time and time again. And now the Trump 
administration refuses to disclose the latest ruling from the FISA 
Court detailing ongoing abuses.
  The long and ongoing history of abuse makes it clear that without 
checks from a separate branch of government, section 702 will always be 
at risk of abuse as a massive delegation of power to an executive 
Agency. That is why the drafters of the Constitution many years ago--
250--decided that we should never have warrantless searches of 
Americans. They prohibited it.
  It is time to stop tinkering around the edges of 702 and make 
meaningful changes once and for all. That is why I joined Republican 
Senator Mike Lee of Utah to introduce the SAFE Act--a bipartisan bill 
in the Senate that would require the government to obtain a judicial 
warrant before searching Americans' communications collected under 
section 702. But Republican leadership have refused to hold a vote on 
the SAFE Act and instead have attempted to extend FISA's authorization 
without any serious reform.
  I have been through this many times since 9/11. I am obviously 
skeptical of this power being given to the government. And I have 
watched, when we find abuses, well-documented abuses, the limited 
reforms that are finally accepted, and they just don't do the job.
  Let me give you, from the Brennan Center for Justice report, some 
numbers that tell the story.

       Congress and the FISA Court have attempted to place some 
     modest limits on the government's use of backdoor searches.

  That is what they call it when Americans are swept up.

       Intelligence agencies, and the [Federal Bureau of 
     Investigations] in particular, have habitually violated those 
     limits. In 2022, the FISA Court observed that ``compliance 
     problems with the FBI's querying of Section 702 
     information have proven to be persistent and widespread.'' 
     Indeed, in March 2022, the government reported more than 
     278,000--

  More than 278,000--

     noncompliant searches of information obtained through FISA.

  These noncompliant searches would include eavesdropping on Americans 
without government approval--278,000.

       Moreover, from 2018 through 2024, the law required the FBI 
     to obtain a warrant before conducting backdoor searches in a 
     very small subcategory of cases involving certain criminal 
     investigations. Despite conducting dozens of such searches 
     during that time, the FBI never once got a warrant.

  As required by our Constitution.
  The abuses continue, and there are those we know nothing about that 
are going on as of this day.
  There was an investigation of the use of FISA, leading to a 
classified report, which I have seen myself in the Senate intelligence 
SCIF. Members of the Senate can have access to it, but the Trump 
administration refuses to make it public for the rest of America. That 
is unfortunate. It makes the argument that I believe is compelling in 
this case.
  Republican leadership have refused to hold a vote on this reform 
measure Senator Lee and I have introduced. They have argued this 
program is just too essential to allow for any delay in reauthorization 
or consideration of real reforms.
  Yet, just recently, President Trump said that before we reauthorize 
FISA, we have to agree to add his elections reform measure--the one 
that requires ID requirements before you can vote. Now, there are 
certain IDs which are easy, but in the original version of this bill 
that the President wants, driver's licenses, which we use all over the 
country, would not be acceptable.
  Congress has time to get this right. Section 702 surveillance 
operates under yearlong certifications approved by the FISA Court, and 
it has already been recertified through March of next year, 2027. This 
means intelligence collection under 702 will be able to continue until 
next March even if the law technically expires this week--or last week.

[[Page S2804]]

  But if my colleagues want to reauthorize section 702 quickly, there 
is a simple solution, and my colleague Senator Wyden of Oregon made 
this point on the floor last week. We can bring reform to section 702 
and give larger numbers to support it and its reauthorization. Support 
these commonsense, bipartisan reforms supported by a majority of 
American citizens to prevent 702 from being used to violate basic 
constitutional rights.
  Unfortunately, our demands for reform have received no help from the 
President. He is more concerned with pushing the SAVE America Act, 
changing every election--his bill to make it harder for Americans to 
vote.
  Over the weekend, President Trump announced that he opposes any FISA 
reauthorization that does not include Save America, as I mentioned. 
This act would slap undue burdens and excessive costs on Americans 
seeking to exercise their most fundamental right--the right to vote.
  So why would the President support adding this measure to critical 
702 reauthorization? Because he is afraid of the next election. That is 
what it comes down to. He is afraid his party is going to lose in 
November. He saw when he went to Texas and argued that the Republicans 
in control there should redraw all the congressional maps for the 
November election on the chance that the Republicans will pick up more 
seats. We will see what happens.
  Section 702 must not be linked to President Trump's efforts to 
suppress the vote. Instead, Congress should reauthorize it with 
reasonable reforms, bipartisan reforms that protect our national 
security and safeguard America's constitutional rights.
  Trump's campaign of retribution and attacks on America's ability to 
vote make this mission all the more important. We cannot allow a 
President consumed by vengeance to monitor Americans' private 
communications with no external checks or limits.
  Our Nation's Founders understood this well, which is why they created 
the Fourth Amendment to safeguard Americans from government overreach 
into their lives. For too long, section 702 has jeopardized those 
protections, but we have a chance to end that abuse now.
  Let's not wait any longer. Congress should reauthorize section 702 
with sensible reforms and finally put an end to the unconstitutional 
surveillance of innocent American citizens.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Sheehy). The Senator from North Carolina.

                          ____________________