[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 94 (Wednesday, June 3, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2504-S2505]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                              IMMIGRATION

  Mr. DURBIN. We heard it so many times: Rapists, murderers, 
terrorists, the criminally insane, child predators--we are going to 
unleash the forces of the United States to keep us safe from these 
threatening people and dangerous people.
  No argument here. But I think you can find, on both sides of the 
aisle, Democrats and Republicans who agree those people should be the 
subject of law enforcement, and they shouldn't be allowed to live in 
our communities, period.
  But what has actually happened with this war on immigration from the 
Trump White House? I have seen it firsthand in the city of Chicago, 
Aurora, and many other places in my State, where the ICE agents have 
arrived. America saw it firsthand in Minneapolis, when the ICE agents 
on the streets killed--murdered--two innocent people who were merely 
protesting, as they have a right to do under our Constitution.
  So where are we today? Well, we are considering an appropriations 
bill, I assume today or at least this week, called reconciliation, 
which will appropriate more money for immigration enforcement than ever 
in our history.
  And to give you an idea of perspective of whether it is proportionate 
to the threat that we face, consider this fact. The amount of money 
that will be appropriated for ICE agents--remember the people wearing 
masks in Minneapolis? The amount of money that the Republicans want to 
appropriate is larger than the appropriations for the U.S. Marine 
Corps--the U.S. Marine Corps--one of our best fighting units in the 
history of the United States. They want more money to go after illegal 
immigrants.
  So the question, obviously, is how are they doing with the billions 
of dollars that are being spent on ICE and Border Patrol? How are they 
doing? It turns out that six out of the seven people who have been 
arrested by this immigration force had no criminal record whatsoever--
six out of seven.

[[Page S2505]]

  You ought to listen to the story of one of these people and come to 
understand what I am talking about.
  This is Juan Chavez Velasco. What does he do for a living? He is a 
medical laboratory scientist.
  How long has he lived in the United States? Twenty-five years.
  During the COVID-19 pandemic, Juan was a frontline worker at the 
hospital in his hometown. He never missed a day of work.
  Juan has a problem, though. He is undocumented. His parents brought 
him to the United States when he was 8 years old. They made the 
decision to come to this country. Juan was in the backseat of the car.
  For more than a decade, his ability to live and work in this country 
has been protected by one thing: DACA. You see, Juan is a DACA holder.
  What is the DACA Program? Let me give you a minute or two of 
background. Over 20 years ago, I introduced a bill called the DREAM 
Act. And the DREAM Act said, if you were brought to the United States 
by your parents as a child--an infant, a toddler, a child under the age 
of 18--they made the decision to come to this country. You came with 
them. You were part of the family. And they didn't file the right 
paperwork for you. You are undocumented in the United States. The DREAM 
Act said, if there was a violation of law, you shouldn't be held 
responsible at 8 years of age due to your family's decision to come to 
this country.
  What have you done with your life since? Have you gone to school? 
Have you committed a crime? There are serious questions we should ask.
  But if you pass those tests, if you pass a criminal background 
check--a criminal background check--if you pay $600 every 2 years, you 
can have what is known as DACA. DACA is protection for you to work in 
the United States legally and not be deported.
  Juan is one of those people, a medical laboratory scientist, 
protected by DACA, and he has been for years. With DACA, Juan has been 
a contributing member for our country for years.
  And then President Trump was elected to a second term. Everything 
changed.
  In February, Juan was driving to deliver milk to a hospital to his 
infant daughter in the NICU, and he was stopped by ICE agents. You 
remember that you saw them on television. They wear the masks. They 
dress in camo. They carry guns around.
  His wife Stephanie was on the phone with him as ICE agents questioned 
his immigration status, and they decided to detain him. He told them 
point-blank: I am a DACA holder. Every 2 years, I have to register and 
pay $600 and go through a criminal background check, as required by 
Executive order and law. I have done all those things. They ignored 
him.
  What happened to Juan? He was retained in ICE detention for 3 months. 
When his son Damien visited him in detention, he sobbed at the sight of 
his father behind a glass barrier. He could not understand why the 
government took his dad away from him.
  Juan was finally released last month, after his wife Stephanie 
bravely testified at a spotlight hearing that I convened. But he is not 
yet free. Juan still lives in fear that, any day, ICE agents could 
return and take him away from his family and deport him to Colombia.
  Juan's story is heartbreaking, but it is only one of many stories 
from Dreamers who have been targeted by the Trump administration.
  He is no danger. He is no criminal. He shows up, as the law requires, 
every 2 years, pays $600, and goes through a criminal background check 
and then goes to his job at a medical laboratory in his hometown.
  Upon returning to office, the President has used every tool at his 
disposal to thwart the protections of DACA, which was created to give 
young people like Juan a chance to remain in the United States. Last 
year, ICE arrested 261 people just like Juan, deporting 86 of them, all 
of them DACA holders.
  And even those who have not been detained have been facing 
unprecedented delays in renewing their DACA status. They have shown up, 
as they are supposed to, when they are supposed to, and they are told: 
We are not going to approve you.
  Without renewal, these young people will lose their ability to work 
legally in the United States and will not be protected from 
deportation.
  The administration's attack on immigrants goes far beyond DACA. With 
President Trump and his close friend and adviser Stephen Miller in the 
White House, no immigrant is safe from this administration.
  Last month, the Trump administration announced it would force legal--
legal--immigrants to leave America and apply for a green card back in 
their country of origin, except in rare circumstances. That means 
immigrants who may have been here for years, who married a U.S. 
citizen, who have children who are citizens, would have to leave their 
families for God knows how long.
  Rural communities, incidentally, have doctors and medical 
professionals that fit right into this category. They would lose the 
only doctor in town.
  And with bans in effect preventing consular processing for green card 
applicants from 75 countries, there is no assurance that once having 
left the United States, they could ever return.
  Of course, the implementation of this policy has been chaotic. After 
an outcry across the country, the Department of Homeland Security 
claimed to have rolled back their decision, saying applicants who 
``benefit the national interest''--whatever that means--would not be 
affected.
  But it remains to be seen how this administration will define 
``national interest.''
  Will spouses of U.S. citizens qualify? Will immigrants sponsored for 
a green card for their work as doctors and nurses be allowed to stay in 
this country? We honestly don't know the answer to that.
  The terror and fear that this administration seeks to inspire in 
legal immigrants does not make our Nation great. It undermines the 
promise we made to these people. We said to them, under DACA, if you do 
the right thing, if you work with government Agencies, if you are 
honest and don't commit a crime, we will protect you. And now the Trump 
administration is reversing this.
  These are individuals who have lived in America for years, graduated 
alongside our kids, married and had their own U.S. citizen children, 
and are contributing to our communities.
  Why would we want them to leave? As the Senate prepares to consider 
the upcoming Republican budget bill, which would put another $70 
billion into the President's mass deportation program, I urge my 
Republican colleagues to stand up and look at this honestly. I think we 
can agree on some basics. Let me say a few.
  No. 1, we should never knowingly allow a dangerous person to come 
into this country.
  No. 2, if someone is in this country, seeking legal status or 
permanent status, and has committed a dangerous crime, they are gone. 
Period.
  No. 3, the United States cannot absorb every person in the world who 
wants to come into our country at this time. It has to be an orderly 
process.
  If we agree on those three basic things, can we finally sit down and 
write immigration laws that make sense in the 21st century? I think we 
can. But we have got to take hatred and cruelty off the table. We have 
got to be honest and sincere.
  Juan should have a future in this country. He is doing something good 
for this country now in this medical laboratory. He is obeying the law. 
He is showing up as he is supposed to. He is paying every 2 years his 
fee of $600, and he goes through a criminal background check.
  He was brought here at the age of 8, for goodness' sake. Wouldn't you 
give him a chance to earn his way toward legal status in this country? 
I would, the DREAM Act would, and so would DACA.
  As the Senate considers the appropriations before us for 
recordbreaking amounts of money, to the poor people like Juan, I ask my 
colleagues on both sides of the aisle: Take a look at the reality of 
the situation. Stop depending on labels. These are real human beings 
who are doing their best to make this a better country.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Texas.

                          ____________________