[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 93 (Tuesday, June 2, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H3745-H3746]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




      TRANSFER OF LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 5682) to take certain land in the State of California into 
trust for the benefit of the Pechanga Band of Indians, and for other 
purposes, as amended.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 5682

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE PECHANGA BAND 
                   OF INDIANS.

       (a) In General.--Subject to valid existing rights and the 
     conditions described in subsection (c), the covered land is 
     hereby taken into trust for the benefit of the Tribe.
       (b) Administration.--The land taken into trust under 
     subsection (a) shall be--
       (1) part of the reservation of the Tribe; and
       (2) administered in accordance with the laws and 
     regulations generally applicable to property held in trust by 
     the United States for the benefit of an Indian Tribe.
       (c) Conditions.--
       (1) In general.--The land taken into trust under subsection 
     (a) shall be--
       (A) subject to all valid encumbrances, liens, rights-of-
     way, reciprocal road rights-of-way agreements, licenses, 
     leases, permits, and easements existing on the date of the 
     enactment of this Act;
       (B) maintained as open space; and
       (C) used only for--
       (i) purposes consistent with the maintenance of the land as 
     open space; and
       (ii) the protection, preservation, and maintenance of the 
     archaeological, cultural, and wildlife resources on the land.
       (2) Construction and maintenance.--Nothing in this 
     paragraph prohibits the construction or maintenance of 
     utilities or structures that are--
       (A) consistent with the maintenance of the land taken into 
     trust under subsection (a) as open space; and
       (B) constructed for the protection, preservation, and 
     maintenance of the archaeological, cultural, and wildlife 
     resources on the land.
       (3) Prohibition on gaming.--The land taken into trust under 
     subsection (a) shall not be used for any class II gaming or 
     class III gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (as 
     those terms are defined in section 4 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 
     2703)).
       (d) Rights and Agreements.--Nothing in this Act shall 
     alter, or require the alteration of, any existing water 
     rights or service agreements.
       (e) Map on File.--The Map shall be kept on file and 
     available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of 
     the Bureau of Land Management.
       (f) Definitions.--In this Act:
       (1) Covered land.--The term ``covered land'' means all 
     right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
     approximately 860 acres of land in Riverside County, 
     California, administered by the Bureau of Land Management and 
     generally depicted as ``Proposed Pechanga Land Conveyance 
     Parcel'' on the Map.
       (2) Map.--The term ``Map'' means the map titled ``BLM Lands 
     into Trust for the Pechanga Band of Indians'', and dated 
     August 21, 2025.
       (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
     of the Interior.
       (4) Tribe.--The term ``Tribe'' means the Pechanga Band of 
     Indians.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentlewoman from New Mexico (Ms.

[[Page H3746]]

Stansbury) each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.


                             General Leave

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to 
include extraneous material on H.R. 5682, the bill under consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Arkansas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  I rise to support H.R. 5682, introduced by Congressman Issa, which 
would place approximately 860 acres of Bureau of Land Management land 
into trust for the Pechanga Band of Indians.
  Located in Temecula, California, the Pechanga Band has a deep desire 
to protect its ancestral and cultural land. This includes the Pu'eska 
Mountain, which is central to the Pechanga's creation stories and 
spiritual life. The Pechanga Band was able to purchase Pu'eska Mountain 
in 2012 and placed it into trust in 2015.
  The 860 acres of BLM-managed land conveyed in this legislation are 
interspersed within the Pechanga Band's existing holdings, including 
the Pu'eska Mountain. This unwieldy checkerboard pattern of land 
ownership has complicated the Pechanga Band's access to and stewardship 
of its sacred land.
  With this transfer, however, the Tribe will consolidate its ownership 
and will reasonably maintain the land. The legislation requires that 
the land remain as open space and be used only for cultural and 
conservation purposes. The bill also includes an explicit prohibition 
on gaming, pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
  I want to thank my friend Mr. Issa for working diligently with the 
Pechanga Band to develop H.R. 5682, and I reserve the balance of my 
time.
  Ms. STANSBURY. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  I rise in support of H.R. 5682, which will return ancestral homelands 
in southern California to the Pechanga Band of Indians. The lands that 
would be returned under this bill are located within the Pu'eska 
Mountain, a sacred site with cultural, historic, and religious 
significance to the Tribe.
  In the mid-2000s, the Tribe fought tirelessly to protect these lands 
from destructive mining that would have destroyed the mountain. They 
ultimately purchased and took into trust much of these lands.
  In addition to the Tribe, the Bureau of Land Management holds several 
parcels on the mountain, including approximately 1,261 acres adjacent 
to the Tribe's trust land.
  H.R. 5682 will take these lands into trust for the benefit of the 
Tribe, consolidating most of the mountain into Tribal trust land and 
allowing the Tribe to steward their ancestral lands.
  I urge my colleagues to support the passage of this legislation, and 
I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Issa), the lead sponsor of this bill.
  Mr. ISSA. I thank the chairman for yielding.
  Mr. Speaker, this is not the first or the second time the Pechanga 
have reached out to expand these historic and ancestral lands and to 
preserve them. We have a long track history now of the Pechanga Indians 
taking into trust and improving the lands that they have purchased or 
that are transferred.
  Previously, the Bureau of Land Management came to us and said: We 
have land we cannot afford to maintain. It has no value. It is a 
mountainside. Is there any interest in it by the Native American Tribes 
in the area? We were pleasantly surprised to discover that, yes, there 
was. And, in fact, they had for years been clandestinely trying to do 
what they could to preserve the land.
  As many people know, California's Native Americans were landless for 
many years, displaced by the Spaniards, taken away, and not until 
Ulysses S. Grant did they begin returning to their ancestral homes.
  As a result, there are massive amounts of their historic lands that 
either lie in private hands or public hands.
  Pechanga has bought at its own expense private lands, in this case 
public lands which are not able to be maintained properly and which 
would have a cost to the Federal Government. These lands will be taken 
over and maintained by the Pechanga Band of Native American Indians. 
That means that the Federal Government saves money through this 
transfer.
  More importantly, their stewardship has, in fact, been good for the 
surrounding area. As many people know, fires rage in southern 
California on a regular basis. Land that is not properly maintained, 
especially with low-lying, highly flammable shrubbery, burns quickly 
and spreads to surrounding areas. Under the Pechanga stewardship, that 
will be partially abated and, in fact, managed.

  Lastly, Pechanga at its own expense has built a large fire 
department, one that maintains these lands as well or better than the 
surrounding communities. That means for Temecula, Riverside County, and 
other areas, again, this is a savings at the expense of the Tribe. They 
do this because of the importance of the land to their people.
  For that reason, I ask that this be moved forward positively on 
behalf of the Federal Government's benefit and the benefit of our 
Native Americans.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time. I am 
prepared to close, and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Ms. STANSBURY. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this 
legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, again, the Pechanga Band of Indians have 
worked to consolidate their ancestral and cultural land for years. The 
conveyance authorized by this legislation will unwind much of the 
checkerboard pattern that has prevented the Pechanga Band from readily 
accessing its lands, including its most sacred site, the Pu'eska 
Mountain.
  I thank Mr. Issa for his work on this straightforward but important 
legislation. I support H.R. 5682, and I yield back the balance of my 
time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House suspend the 
rules and pass the bill, H.R. 5682, as amended.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________