[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 26, 2026)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E490]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




 TESTIMONY OF MS. DANI BENSKY, ``SURVIVORS FIGHT FOR JUSTICE: EXPOSING 
         EPSTEIN'S CRIMES IN PALM BEACH AND ACROSS THE WORLD''

                                 ______
                                 

                           HON. SUMMER L. LEE

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, May 26, 2026

  Ms. LEE of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, on May 12, 2026, Oversight 
Committee Democrats convened the first-ever hearing to solicit 
testimony from survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's 
crimes. The hearing, ``Survivors Fight for Justice: Exposing Epstein's 
Crimes in Palm Beach and Across the World,'' marked a critical step 
forward in the fight for justice and accountability.
  On behalf of all the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine 
Maxwell's crimes, I rise to include in the Record the testimony offered 
by Ms. Dani Bensky:

       Hello, my name is Dani Bensky, I was abused by Jeffrey 
     Epstein in 2004-05. That was 8 years after the FBI was first 
     alerted.
       Although my abuse is nowhere near ``easy'' to discuss and I 
     live with diagnosed PTSD from that experience, my story is 
     one of the safest to tell. The key abuser who caused me 
     physical harm is dead. It's imperative to understand that the 
     stories that you are hearing today are a tiny fraction of the 
     whole. I am one of more than 1,200 girls and women, and each 
     story is unique. I don't face the same level of threats of 
     defamation lawsuits and serious risks to my health and 
     physical safety as some of my survivor sisters do. The main 
     perpetrator in my story is no longer in a position of power. 
     While there are co-conspirators who need to be held 
     accountable for the parts they played in the operation of my 
     abuse, I was trafficked only to Epstein, which was 
     unfortunately not the case for so many others.
       I'm here to tell you my story, which happens to fall in the 
     middle of the 30 years of the Epstein timeline. I was groomed 
     prior to meeting Jeffrey Epstein. I grew up in the dance 
     world. Perfectionism and body image issues ran rampant in a 
     world built on hierarchy and at times, secrecy. Older 
     teachers, artistic directors, and company members had unique 
     access to young dancers. I was accustomed to private lessons 
     with a ballet mistress that I was not allowed to tell anyone 
     about. The secrecy was because she hand selected dancers to 
     develop. I would go to her apartment, strip off my sweatpants 
     to my leotard and tights and have my body be criticized, 
     critiqued, and manipulated, not so different from what I 
     initially experienced with Jeffrey.
       I was trafficked to Jeffrey. It happened in broad daylight 
     on Manhattan's Upper East Side. I had two recruiters, one was 
     a late teen, the other was only 15 years old and just trying 
     to escape her own abuse and make it for herself. There was a 
     process of systematic manipulation. Jeffrey weaponized my 
     aspirations and dreams by speaking the language of dance, 
     making false promises, and continuing to prey on my body 
     image issues. My mom had been diagnosed with a brain tumor. I 
     had seen the name ``Epstein'' listed on a donor wall and 
     believed that his wealth and power had come from the medical 
     profession. I brought him her scans. I was hoping to 
     understand her diagnosis. He told me that he could help 
     ensure the best doctors and care, or he could have it taken 
     away. He held my mother's brain scans over me, giving me an 
     ultimatum: either recruit more girls or do more for him. I 
     didn't recruit anyone and instead endured the abuse. In May 
     of 2005 my mother had a successful operation at Mount Sinai 
     to remove the tumor. Jeffrey was not in charge of her care, 
     nor did he provide financial support for her surgery. Once my 
     mother was rehabilitated, and I knew she would live, I 
     finally extricated myself from Jeffrey Epstein and his web.
       The Epstein case demonstrates that institutional systems 
     have failed survivors time and time again. I was first 
     subpoenaed in 2008 for an interview. I was truly terrified 
     entering the FBI. I was just 20 years old and without a 
     victim's rights advocate or a lawyer; I didn't know I was 
     entitled to those protections. No one told me I was safe, and 
     many parts of the interview felt like an interrogation. 
     Jeffrey had already threatened my friend, and he had told me 
     that I would be charged with prostitution if I ever 
     interacted with law enforcement. That thought was pervasive, 
     it sat deep in me, haunting me. Shame cloaked in fear 
     prevented me from speaking out. To say that I feared for my 
     safety is an understatement. He made it clear that he held 
     the cards.
       If authorities had listened to Maria Farmer in 1996, when 
     she first reported Jeffrey to the FBI, hundreds of girls, 
     including myself, might have had a completely different life 
     trajectory. Yet, time and time again, these systems have 
     failed survivors.
       The systemic failures of survivors extend beyond the 
     victims of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislane Maxwell, as 
     documented by the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency 
     Act. Survivors from across the nation contacted their 
     congressional leaders and fueled this fight. Survivors, 
     advocates, and constituents across the country wanted to see 
     change. Yet, despite the Act's passage, a moment in which 
     survivors hoped and believed that we might see some 
     reckoning, we were met with yet another harsh disappointment. 
     Prior to the Transparency Act passing, we met with lawmakers 
     on both sides of the aisle where we made two things 
     abundantly clear. 1. We are not political, we are human. 2. 
     Protections for survivors are imperative, no redactions for 
     perpetrators. Out of an abundance of caution, my lawyer then 
     teamed up with another law firm representing survivors, and 
     together they submitted 350 victims' names to the DOJ as 
     names that needed to be redacted prior to the deadline on 
     December 19th.
       In that first round of documents, I saw my name in two 
     places. Then in the January dump, there were more and the 
     redactions were far worse. Seeing my information exposed in 
     those documents triggers intense PTSD. There's a feeling that 
     shoots through my body like a hot flash on a bullet and a 
     nausea that lives in the deepest parts of my being. With 
     every exposure survivors are revictimized. I am just one of 
     hundreds of the survivors exposed. These files displayed my 
     name, phone number, old address, where I worked at the time, 
     where I was studying, and other identifying information. 
     What's important to understand is that these documents 
     weren't somehow just overlooked and not redacted at all, on 
     one document my nickname is redacted, while Danielle Hannah 
     Bensky is left completely unredacted.
       A few weeks ago, a legal analyst reached out to share that 
     yet again, my name appeared in a 3rd batch of only 20 
     documents. After my lawyer continued to contact the DOJ on 
     multiple occasions for protection my name and information 
     remained attached. These documents hold disturbing, yet 
     incomplete accounts of my abuse, and they were viewable not 
     only by the entire world, but also by my child, my students, 
     my students' parents, my friends, my employers, my 
     colleagues, and my family. I'm public, however in my FBI 302, 
     a Jane Doe who has never wanted to be revealed was exposed. 
     She is someone I have tried to protect. This outing of 
     survivor names does real irrevocable damage.
       The passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act was meant 
     to be a moment when survivors could regain their power and 
     finally obtain the truth, transparency, and justice they 
     deserve. It was a time for our institutions, created to 
     protect the American people, to, for once, side with 
     survivors. As survivors we have said time and time again this 
     is not political. This requires coming together and not 
     prioritizing political showmanship.
       I recently had the opportunity to return to Jeffrey's 
     mansion on the Upper East Side. Normally, when you're a 
     child, everything feels massive, and when you revisit those 
     same places as an adult, they seem smaller. That was 
     certainly not the case here. Jeffrey's mansion on the Upper 
     East Side of Manhattan still felt immense, the doors towering 
     and the architecture looming, designed in a way to make you 
     feel small. This reflects something deeper. Our entrenched 
     systemic failures have allowed powerful people like Jeffrey 
     to make others feel small. When institutions prioritize 
     protecting the powerful and their enablers over protecting 
     victims, individuals like Jeffrey become normalized.
       If we continue down this path, the question isn't whether 
     the abuse will happen again, but who? Who is the next Jeffrey 
     Epstein? What will be the next mansion used to exploit 
     privilege and enable the abuse of young girls? I'm always 
     asked ``what does accountability look like?'' Getting 
     perpetrators out of positions of power, seeing arrests be 
     made, and a complete culture shift to not only believe our 
     most vulnerable populations, but protect them.
       This moment is critical. It is time to reform our system to 
     protect our survivors, not perpetrators, and to ensure the 
     truth can come to light.

                          ____________________