[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 87 (Thursday, May 21, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H3692-H3699]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




            SMITHSONIAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM ACT

  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 1300, I call up 
the bill (H.R. 1329) to permit the Smithsonian American Women's History 
Museum to be located within the Reserve of the National Mall, and for 
other purposes, and ask for its immediate consideration.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 1300, the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
House Administration, printed in this bill, modified by the amendment 
printed in part B of House Report 119-653, is adopted and the bill, as 
amended, is considered read.
  The text of the bill, as amended, is as follows:

                               H.R. 1329

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Smithsonian American Women's 
     History Museum Act''.

[[Page H3693]]

  


     SEC. 2. SITE OF SMITHSONIAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM.

       (a) Authorizing Site Within Reserve of National Mall.--
     Section 107(d) of division T of the Consolidated 
     Appropriations Act, 2021 (20 U.S.C. 80t-5(d)) is amended by 
     striking ``, except that'' and all that follows and inserting 
     a period.
       (b) Site Designation.--Section 107(a) of division T of the 
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (20 U.S.C. 80t-5(a)) is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(a) In General.--The site for the Museum is hereby 
     designated as the South Monument site, located on the 
     National Mall, bordered by 14th Street Southwest, Jefferson 
     Drive Southwest, Raoul Wallenberg Place Southwest, and 
     Independence Avenue Southwest, except that the President may 
     designate an alternative site for the Museum within 180 days 
     of the date of the enactment of this subsection.''.
       (c) Use of Site.--
       (1) Transfer.--Section 107(b) of division T of the 
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (20 U.S.C. 80t-5(b)) is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(b) Transfer of Site.--As soon as practicable after the 
     date of the enactment of this subsection, the head of the 
     Federal agency or entity shall transfer to the Smithsonian 
     Institution its administrative jurisdiction over the land 
     described in subsection (a).''.
       (2) Building requirements.--Section 107(c) of division T of 
     the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (20 U.S.C. 80t-
     5(c)) is amended to read as follows:
       ``(c) Building.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Board of Regents, in consultation 
     with the head of the Federal agency or entity and the council 
     established under section 104 and with the approval of the 
     Commission of Fine Arts, National Capital Planning 
     Commission, the National Capital Memorial Advisory 
     Commission, and the head of the Federal agency or entity, may 
     plan, design, and construct a building for the Museum, which 
     shall be located at the site described in subsection (a).
       ``(2) Criteria.--In considering site and design proposals, 
     the Commission of Fine Arts, the National Capital Planning 
     Commission, the National Capital Memorial Advisory 
     Commission, and the head of the Federal agency or entity 
     shall be guided by, but not limited to the following 
     criteria:
       ``(A) The Museum shall be located so that to the maximum 
     extent practicable, it protects the open space, existing 
     public use, and cultural and natural resources.
       ``(B) The Museum shall be constructed of durable material 
     suitable to the outdoor environment.
       ``(C) Landscape features of the Museum shall be compatible 
     with the climate.
       ``(D) The National Capital Planning Commission and the 
     Commission of Fine Arts may develop such criteria or 
     guidelines specific to each site that are mutually agreed 
     upon to ensure that the design of the Museum carries out the 
     purposes of this section.''.
       (3) Expenses.--Section 107 of division T of the 
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (20 U.S.C. 80t-5) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(f) Expenses.--The Smithsonian Institution shall 
     reimburse within 60 days any and all costs incurred by the 
     head of the Federal agency or entity for implementation of 
     any recommendations resulting from the approval process 
     described in subsection (c).''.
       (d) Museum Purpose.--Section 103 of division T of the 
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (20 U.S.C. 80t-1) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following:
       ``(c) Scope of Mission.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Museum shall be dedicated to 
     preserving, researching, and presenting the history, 
     achievements, and lived experiences of biological women in 
     the United States.
       ``(2) Prohibition.--The Museum may not identify, present, 
     describe, or otherwise depict any biological male as a 
     female.''.
       (e) Ensuring a Range of Political Viewpoints and Authentic 
     Experiences.--Section 104(b)(4) of division T of the 
     Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (20 U.S.C. 80t-2(b)(4)) 
     is amended to read as follows:
       ``(4) Ensuring a Range of political viewpoints and 
     authentic experiences.--
       ``(A) In general.--The Council shall ensure that the 
     exhibits and programs of the Museum reflect, to the extent 
     practicable, an equal representation of a range of the 
     political viewpoints and authentic experiences held by women 
     in the United States, accurately and comprehensively 
     representing the varied cultures, histories, events, and 
     values held by such women.
       ``(B) Specific requirements.--In carrying out its duties, 
     the Council shall ensure that it seeks and utilizes to its 
     maximum ability guidance from a broad array of knowledgeable 
     and respected sources reflecting a range of the political 
     viewpoints and authentic experiences held by women in the 
     United States, and shall seek such guidance for both the 
     creation and substantial revision of exhibits and programs.
       ``(C) Definitions.--In this paragraph--
       ``(i) the term `broad array' means a range of experts and 
     publications that represent the broad spectrum of communities 
     of women, to include varied viewpoints, political ideologies, 
     cultures, and lived experiences in the United States; and
       ``(ii) the term `knowledgeable and respected source' means 
     an individual who has gained through education, publication, 
     or witnessing an important or historical event, the ability 
     to advise on at least one unique viewpoint or experience of a 
     particular community of women in the United States, and whose 
     knowledge has been relied upon by a notable segment of that 
     community for education, heritage preservation, or historical 
     purposes, and includes the work of such an individual which 
     reflects such ability and knowledge.''.
       (f) Reports to Congress.--Not later than 120 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act and every 2 years 
     thereafter, the Secretary of the Smithsonian shall submit to 
     the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 
     Representatives, the Committee on Energy and Natural 
     Resources of the Senate, the Committee on House 
     Administration of the House of Representatives, the Committee 
     on Rules and Administration of the Senate, the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives, the Committee on Appropriations of the House 
     of Representatives, and the Committee on Appropriations of 
     the Senate a report on actions taken by the Director of the 
     Smithsonian American Women's History Museum and the Council 
     of the Museum to comply with the requirements of the 
     amendments made by subsection (f), including a description of 
     actions taken with respect to substantial revisions of 
     current exhibits and programs as well the planning of future 
     exhibits and programs.
       (g) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made 
     by this section shall take effect as if included in the 
     enactment of title I of division T of the Consolidated 
     Appropriations Act, 2021 (20 U.S.C. 80t et seq.).

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The bill, as amended, shall be debated for 1 
hour, equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on House Administration, or their respective 
designees.
  The gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Steil) and the gentleman from New 
York (Mr. Morelle) will each control 30 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Steil).

                              {time}  1320


                             General Leave

  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may 
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and 
include extraneous material on this bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Wisconsin?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1329, the Smithsonian American 
Women's History Museum Act, introduced by my colleague, Representative 
Malliotakis, from New York.
  This year, our Nation marks its 250th birthday. It has been 250 years 
since we declared independence. As we celebrate this milestone, I think 
it is all the more worthy that we pass this bill and begin construction 
of the museum dedicated to the history of American women.
  Throughout our history, women have played a pivotal role in so many 
of our Nation's most celebrated achievements and innovations. In my 
home State of Wisconsin, three women participated in the famous 1854 
meeting at the Ripon schoolhouse, where the Republican Party was born.
  Mr. Speaker, I was proud to support previous legislation authorizing 
the creation of this museum. Today's bill takes the important next step 
by designating an exact location on The National Mall. Additionally, it 
creates guardrails to ensure this museum does not represent history in 
a partisan way.
  I thank Representative Malliotakis for her work on this bill and her 
continued support to get this to the floor. She has been tenacious in a 
great way to get us to this spot. I thank her for her hard work.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the legislation, and I 
reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I have said it before, and I will say it again: The 
Smithsonian American Women's History Museum is long overdue, and it 
deserves a place on The National Mall, period, end of sentence.
  The National Mall is America's front yard. It is the place we welcome 
visitors from all over the world. The Smithsonian is where we gather 
the stories, ideas, inventions, and memories that make us who we are. 
It is where we keep what matters to our large and, yes, very diverse 
American family. It is where our Nation tells its story, and American 
women have shaped every chapter of that story.
  This is why I enthusiastically supported the bipartisan version of 
H.R. 1329, produced by my Republican colleague and friend from New 
York, Representative Nicole Malliotakis, along with her companion bill, 
H.R. 1330, related to the National Museum of the American Latino.
  Together, those bills would resolve a statutory anomaly that has 
stalled both museums and allow them to move

[[Page H3694]]

forward on The Mall as Congress intended.
  The bipartisan legislation is a simple, straightforward fix with 231 
cosponsors in this House, including over 100 Members from each side of 
the aisle.
  For some reason, that is not the bill we are debating. I am saddened 
and disappointed that the Republican majority has needlessly 
politicized what has for years been a bipartisan priority.
  The hyperpartisan museum bill we are debating right now differs from 
the original legislation in four primary and important ways.
  First, it omits the National Museum of the American Latino, which has 
been paired with the women's history museum since they were both 
authorized together in 2020.
  Second, for reasons that pass all understanding, it grants the 
President of the United States unprecedented, unilateral, and unchecked 
authority to disregard the Smithsonian's recommended site and the 
Congress' recommended site for any reason, or for no reason at all, and 
pick his own.
  Third, it hands control over design and construction to boards 
stacked with political loyalists who have already shown they will 
rubberstamp whatever the President wants. To see evidence of that, look 
no further than the pile of rubble that used to be the White House East 
Wing.
  Fourth, it inserts an ideological poison pill intended to dictate 
what the museum can and cannot say about women's history.
  Mr. Speaker, we deal with a lot of complicated issues around here 
that require complex solutions. This is not one of them. There is a 
Republican-led bipartisan bill just sitting here with 231 cosponsors, 
including 104 Republican Members. We could pass that bill on suspension 
right now.
  The American people will be baffled, as I am, that my Republican 
colleagues have chosen this route instead, especially since, in 2019, 
Democrats accepted a Republican amendment requiring the museum to 
reflect ``the diversity of the political viewpoints held by women of 
the United States.''
  Virtually identical language appears in this bill--ironically, right 
next to the provision that explicitly excludes political viewpoints 
held by women of the United States. I guess it should have explicitly 
read: the diversity of political viewpoints held by Republicans alone.
  If the goal were actually to move this museum forward, we would not 
be abandoning the yearslong bipartisan process that has brought us to 
the brink of construction. We would not be considering a bill with a 
cynical, ideological poison pill. We would not exclude the Latino 
museum. We would not allow boards filled with Trump loyalists to have 
final say on the museum's design and construction. We would certainly 
not be giving President Donald Trump, of all people, unchecked 
authority to pick a location for the women's history museum. We would 
not be spending time debating a bill destined to fail.
  Ask yourselves: Who should decide what appears in a Smithsonian 
museum, where it goes, and what it looks like? Should it be historians, 
scholars, and curators who, for 180 years, have made the Smithsonian 
the premier museum complex in the world, hosting 15 million visitors 
per year? Is that who it should be? Or a politician who complains 
publicly that the Smithsonian focuses too much on ``how bad slavery 
was'' and who has taken a literal wrecking ball to some of our most 
dignified and important landmarks in this country, a politician who 
uses our cultural institutions to rewrite history and hand out no-bid 
government contracts to his friends? That is the question before us.

  If House Republicans want the museum to succeed, the path ahead is 
straightforward and easy. Bring the clean bipartisan fix with its 231 
cosponsors to the floor, pair it with the Latino museum as we have done 
for years, and let the historians and experts do the work of telling 
the full and complex story of American women.
  This legislation does the exact opposite. It takes a bill, the narrow 
purpose of which is to specify a museum location, and throws even more 
uncertainty into that very question. It makes literally no sense.
  Mr. Speaker, I will conclude where I began: The National Mall is 
where we welcome visitors from around the world, of all types. Everyone 
comes here. The Smithsonian is where we mark what makes us who we are. 
They belong to the American people, and the American people deserve 
both the women's history museum and the National Museum of the American 
Latino on The National Mall that tells their stories without political 
interference.
  For these reasons, I urge my colleagues to oppose this bill, and I 
urge the majority to bring the bipartisan bill that 104 Members of 
their Conference have cosponsored to the floor.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I remind my colleague that Democratic leadership had the 
full opportunity in the 117th Congress to bring forward this 
legislation. They chose not to. They used their time to do things like 
rename the Cannon Caucus Room after the current Speaker in the 117th 
Congress. That is just a reminder of the importance that this bill has 
on our side.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consume to the gentlewoman 
from New York (Ms. Malliotakis) to speak on the bill.
  Ms. MALLIOTAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairman Steil for helping us 
advance this bill to the floor. He knows very well the role that his 
State of Wisconsin played in being the first to ratify the 19th 
Amendment.
  We are here today because we are voting on a very simple bill. It is 
a bill to transfer land on The National Mall for the Smithsonian 
American Women's History Museum, which was already authorized by 
Congress, overwhelmingly bipartisan, in 2020, and signed by President 
Donald J. Trump.

                              {time}  1330

  Mr. Speaker, this bill, as my colleague has mentioned, had over 230 
sponsors. It is very bipartisan, and I think we all agree that it is 
long past time that the women of this country, who make up more than 
half of the population, deserve to have a museum that tells their 
stories and shares their contributions to our great country.
  Women like Rosie the Riveter and the millions of women who stepped 
onto our factory floors during World War II; the more than 10,000 code 
girls of Arlington Hall, who were secretly recruited by the U.S. Army 
and Navy during World War II to serve as code breakers; the 855 women 
of the Six Triple Eight, the only all-Black, all-female battalion 
deployed overseas during World War II; the Black Angels of my district, 
who were courageous nurses who, at the height of segregation, worked 
toward and did find the cure for tuberculosis; the first female Member 
of Congress, Jeannette Rankin; Susan B. Anthony and the suffragists, 
the great role that they played in our Nation's history, they are who 
we are here to honor today.
  Yes, we have more than enough women to display in this museum that we 
shouldn't be fighting over the need to have nonbiological individuals 
in there.
  I don't understand why we are pulling bipartisan support from 
legislation to establish this museum. As a matter of fact, let me read 
it so that everybody at home knows exactly what this debate is over. It 
is over one sentence: ``The Museum shall be dedicated to preserving, 
researching, and presenting the history, achievements, and lived 
experiences of biological women in the United States.''
  That is what the disagreement is about. That is what the big 
controversy is about.
  I hate to alert my friends on the other side of the aisle, but a 
museum dedicated to women's history should have women in it. That is 
it. That is simple. That was just something that, through this process, 
regular order, going through the committee process, a Member put 
forward an amendment. It was adopted by the majority of the members on 
the committee, and it added that simple provision.
  The idea that President Trump--by the way because Democrats are 
saying that the National Planning Commission is now a Trump commission. 
This is a commission that was established by Congress over 100 years 
ago. It is not a new commission. In fact, the President only has three 
appointees to that 12-person commission. To say that

[[Page H3695]]

he has complete control is just simply not true.
  I really hope that some of my colleagues on the other side of the 
aisle will join us on this because it would be sad to see that all of 
the Democrats would vote down this important bill.
  Yet, I will say that it was a Republican Senator who introduced the 
19th Amendment, which gave women the right to vote.
  It was a Republican Congress that passed the 19th Amendment to give 
women the right to vote.
  It was a majority of GOP States that gave women the right to vote 
when they ratified that amendment.
  It was a GOP President who gave us Title IX, which prohibited sex-
based discrimination in the educational programs.
  And, yes, it was President Donald Trump, a Republican, who authorized 
this museum in 2020.
  If Republicans have to carry the water again to deliver for the women 
of America, we will do so, but I really hope that this can remain a 
bipartisan measure.
  Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I certainly appreciate my colleague and friend, Ms. 
Malliotakis, and her comments.
  But the truth is, I don't, first of all, think anyone who lives in 
Rochester, New York, the home of Susan B. Anthony, just to the west of 
Seneca Falls, needs to be told about the history of the women's 
suffrage movement in the United States or the fact that Susan B. 
Anthony was arrested in 1872 for voting in a Presidential election.
  We are well-steeped in it, and we think this ought to be a museum 
that is curated by scholars and by women and those groups.
  The location of this, which was identified in a bipartisan bill--and 
the suggestion that somehow we now are not supporting or withholding 
our support for a bipartisan bill is simply wrong.
  Actually, that would be the simple thing to do, to put the bipartisan 
bill on the floor. I don't know what the objection to it is, except 
that it doesn't have the following language, and this is really what it 
is all about, and I will read from the bill:
  ``The site for the Museum is hereby designated as the South Monument 
site, located on The National Mall, bordered by 14th Street Southwest, 
Jefferson Drive, Southwest, Raoul Wallenberg Place Southwest, and 
Independence Avenue Southwest, except that the President may designate 
an alternative site for the Museum within 180 days of the date of the 
enactment of this subsection.''
  The extraneous portion that was added basically takes away everything 
the previous sentence said. Everything the bipartisan bill was intended 
to do is identify this location. But for reasons, as I said earlier, 
that surpass all understanding, we are now going to give the President 
of the United States complete, unilateral, unchecked power to make this 
decision.
  It makes no sense. It is not a bipartisan bill. In fact, if you want 
to have this resolved, you could eliminate that portion of the bill, 
and we could just do the simple sentence under the bipartisan bill, 
which has 104 Republican sponsors of it. We could do that. We could do 
that right now.
  That bill is already in print. Ms. Malliotakis is actually the 
sponsor of that bill, so I would be happy to support that bill of hers. 
But don't suggest for a minute that this is a bipartisan bill because 
it is not. It is actually the most hyperpartisan of bills, all intended 
to make sure that the President is happy with the location of the 
museum and give him the complete power over Congress to make that 
decision.

  Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute the gentleman from California (Mr. 
Takano), my dear friend.
  Mr. TAKANO. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this amended bill. I 
was a proud cosponsor of the bill, as introduced. Yet, instead of 
moving the bipartisan text, Republicans have hijacked this bill to give 
President Trump complete and total authority over the Smithsonian 
American Women's History Museum's location. Contrary to what 
Congresswoman Malliotakis has asserted, he does have loyalists who have 
power over the museum's design. He does have loyalists on the 
commission, which will determine the museum's design.
  The museum was supposed to be a celebration of every American woman's 
contribution, but, of course, Republicans couldn't help themselves from 
adding text that would prohibit trans women from being included in the 
museum. This is really a harmful provision that will undoubtedly lead 
many conservatives to challenge the inclusion of any woman they deem 
not feminine enough.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to reject this bill and pass the 
original bipartisan bill with the National Museum of the American 
Latino.
  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
Florida (Ms. Lee), also a member of the House Administration Committee, 
to speak on this bill.
  Ms. LEE of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the 
creation of a Smithsonian museum dedicated to the history of American 
women. I thank Chairman Steil and Representative Malliotakis for their 
leadership in this important effort.
  Before coming to Congress, I had the privilege of serving as 
Florida's Secretary of State. In that role, I oversaw our State's 
museums, archives, and historical resources, and I gained a deep 
appreciation for the importance of preserving our history carefully and 
telling it well.
  Museums are not simply collections of artifacts. They are places 
where we remember who we are, where we came from, and the values that 
shaped this Nation. The story of America cannot be fully told without 
the story of American women.
  From the earliest days of our country, women have helped to build 
families, communities, and institutions. They served in times of war, 
advanced science and medicine, strengthened our economy, and helped 
expand the promise of liberty for future generations.
  Today, women serve in leadership roles across every aspect of 
American life, but much of that progress in America is relatively 
recent. As someone who has spent much of my career in fields 
historically dominated by men, I know personally how meaningful it is 
when young women can see the stories of those who came before them.
  As an example, since the founding of our Nation, roughly 12,000 
Americans have served in the United States Congress. Yet, only about 
450 of them have been women. Hearing and sharing the stories of those 
women will no doubt pave the path for the talented generation to come 
of women leaders in America.

                              {time}  1340

  Representation matters, and so does remembrance. The stories we 
preserve shape what the next generation believes is possible. This 
museum will tell the story of countless women, teachers, entrepreneurs, 
scientists, soldiers, mothers, and public servants whose perseverance 
and courage helped shape this Nation.
  It is disappointing that some Democrats are opposing this museum 
because it is dedicated to the history and achievements of biological 
women when we should be coming together to honor the women who helped 
shape this Nation.
  As the mother of a daughter, I think often about the examples that 
she sees and the stories that she learns about the women who helped 
shape this country. May she know us, may she and all of the other young 
women like her see what is possible, and may they go further than we 
ever dreamed.
  When young girls walk through the Smithsonian and see the 
contributions of women woven into the fabric of our national history, 
they will understand something important: that they, too, are 
foundational to the American story.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 1 minute to the 
gentlewoman from Florida.
  Ms. LEE of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I look forward to the day when all 
Americans can visit a museum that honors the remarkable legacy of women 
in the United States. For these reasons, I support this effort, and I 
encourage my colleagues to do the same.
  Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I will say I find it rather astonishing that we feel the 
need here to give a lot of advice and counsel

[[Page H3696]]

to the Smithsonian Institution about how to appropriately build and 
operate a museum, to curate a museum--I don't know if anybody has 
been--and, by the way, they do museums really well. We are supposed to 
pass legislation, which we don't even do that well, and now we are 
going to tell them how to run museums.
  I would just encourage my friends, if you haven't, the Smithsonian 
runs a number of museums in town--one on American history, one on 
African Americans, one on American Indians, one on natural history, one 
on air and space. Fifteen million people come to them.
  In the 8 years I have been privileged to be a Member of Congress, I 
have never once had a constituent or anybody else stop me and say, you 
know, I really have some advice to give to the Smithsonian Institution 
about how to run museums. I think they do it exceptionally well.
  In fact, I would argue that the Smithsonian Institution is the 
greatest museum complex anywhere in the world. It is an extraordinary 
place, free to Americans and others who come from other places to see 
the American experience. I don't think they need, really, a whole lot 
of help from Members of the United States House of Representatives on 
how to run museums. Let's let them do that. Let's let academicians, 
scholars, historians, and museum curators do that.
  All we are supposed to do here is say where the location of the 
museum is to be located. That is the one issue in front of us. Talk 
about making complex a simple issue. People will be baffled and 
scratching their heads to watch this debate should they ever watch this 
debate because this is a simple, simple matter, and we should not 
complicate this. Let's identify the location, and let's let the 
Smithsonian Institution do what they do better than any other 
organization in the world.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Washington 
(Ms. Randall), my dear friend and colleague.
  Ms. RANDALL. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to the 
Smithsonian American Women's History Museum Act, as amended. Frankly, 
that is disappointing because this bill used to be a bipartisan success 
story.
  Democrats and Republicans came together to support creating both the 
American Women's History Museum and the National Museum of the American 
Latino on The National Mall, but instead of building on that bipartisan 
agreement, this bill was turned into another political power grab with 
a last-minute partisan amendment in committee.
  Republicans inserted culture war language limiting the museum to 
biological women. That language was not added to improve the museum. It 
was added to erase trans women from American history.
  Whether my Republican colleagues want to acknowledge it or not, trans 
women are just as much a part of this country's history as anyone else. 
Museums are supposed to expand our understanding, preserve truth, and 
reflect the full complexity of this country.
  They went even a step further to corrupt this bill, handing President 
Trump extraordinary control over museum design and planning. Congress 
should not hand any President unilateral power over how American 
history is told, especially after we have seen this administration 
pressure institutions and whitewash history.
  This legislation also leaves behind the National Museum of the 
American Latino, even though Congress established both museums together 
under the same law. Let's be honest about why. We are watching a 
systematic effort by Republicans and this administration to strip out 
uncomfortable truths and erase marginalized communities.
  ``But Latino history is American history''; ``Pero la historia de los 
Latinos es la historia americana.''
  It is not secondary. It is not optional.
  For all these reasons, at the appropriate time, I will offer a motion 
to recommit this bill back to committee.
  If the House rules permitted, I would have offered the motion with an 
important amendment to this bill.
  My amendment would have stripped out the exclusionary language 
targeting trans women, moved the Women's History Museum and the 
National Museum of the American Latino forward together, as Congress 
originally intended, and block this dangerous power grab that hands 
President Trump unilateral control.

  Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to insert the text of this 
amendment into the Record immediately prior to the vote on the motion 
to recommit.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentlewoman from Washington?
  There was no objection.
  Ms. RANDALL. Mr. Speaker, I hope my colleagues will join me in voting 
for the motion to recommit.
  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
Florida (Mrs. Cammack), the mother of Augusta, to speak on the bill.
  Mrs. CAMMACK. Mr. Speaker, I appreciate my colleague from the great 
State of Wisconsin for his leadership on this issue.
  I rise today in strong support of H.R. 1329, the Smithsonian American 
Women's History Museum Act, and I want to start by recognizing my 
colleague Nicole Malliotakis for her tenacity and her leadership in 
bringing this legislation to the floor. I thank Nicole for never 
backing down or giving up.
  As you can see, I have my daughter, Augusta Dair, here with me today 
because I wanted her to be a witness to this incredible moment in our 
Nation's history where we stood up for all of the women who have helped 
build this country and told their stories.
  That is what this museum is. It is not a political statement. It is a 
promise, a promise that the women who came before us will not be 
erased, will not be minimized, and will not be forgotten.
  We all know--or at least I thought we knew--that women's history is 
not a partisan issue. It is American history, full stop. Now, the women 
whose stories will be told in this museum, I want you to think about 
what they went through. It wasn't that long ago--1974--that a woman 
couldn't open a credit card in her own name without her husband's 
signature. Before that, she couldn't serve on a jury, and before that, 
she couldn't vote.
  Yet, these women, extraordinary, stubborn, gritty, American women, 
they didn't quit. They persevered. They built something anyway. Now, if 
that is not an American story, I don't know what is. Quite frankly, it 
is that story that deserves to be told and have a place on our National 
Mall.
  As Chairwoman of the Republican Women's Caucus, I have had the honor 
of standing alongside some of the most incredible women who fight every 
single day not for headlines but for the next generation of girls who 
need them to know that hard work, courage, and grit will take them 
further than anyone can ever tell them they couldn't go before.
  We believe that these women deserve to be honored, proudly, without 
political manipulation, which is why I am genuinely baffled that the 
Democratic Women's Caucus has chosen to oppose this bill. Their 
reasoning for opposing the bill is because we want biological women's 
stories to be told--that we want a museum to be dedicated to women, to 
celebrate women? That is the controversy, Mr. Speaker?
  Forgive me, but this issue should never have become partisan. It is 
common sense. Biological women deserve to have their stories told.
  For those who say that this gives the President too much say about 
what is happening with this museum, that is just nonsense. 
Representative Malliotakis has already refuted the claim that the 
President will have that type of power. He cannot.
  What this bill does is ensure accountability over a federally funded 
institution that will represent American history for generations. The 
Smithsonian belongs to the American people, not to political activists, 
not to ideological agendas.
  I know that millions of women around the country right now are 
standing with us, and they will not apologize for standing up for 
women; not today and not ever.

                              {time}  1350

  I am here right now on the House floor with my daughter, Augusta 
Dair, and I can only do this because of the women who came before me. 
It is those women we strive to honor: the pioneers, the mothers, the 
scientists, the

[[Page H3697]]

servicemembers, the entrepreneurs, the educators, the ones who broke 
barriers before it was fashionable, and the ones who never got a thank-
you. They deserve this. Every little girl in America deserves this.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to reject the political noise 
around this bill, pass this legislation, and ensure that future 
generations like little Augusta's can walk through these Halls, if she 
chooses to, and know without question what American women are made of.
  Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  To quote Mrs. Cammack, whom I have great respect for, women's history 
``is American history, full stop.'' I completely agree, and I am 
delighted to see her and her daughter in her maiden speech in front of 
the House talk about the importance of women in American history. I 
completely agree with that, as well.
  What I find perplexing is that the construction of this museum has 
been held up now for several years since its authorization, because 
Congress could not reconcile the fact that we hadn't fully identified a 
location for the museum. That is the only thing that prevents the 
construction of this museum from moving forward. We have a bipartisan 
solution to address just that, the exact location of where this museum 
should be built.
  I think the question that needs to be answered in this moment is why 
we are not doing that bill. It has 231 cosponsors, a majority of this 
House, and over 100 Members on both sides of the aisle. It is simple 
and straightforward.
  Why aren't we doing that? Why are we here? Why do we have to debate 
for the balance of an hour a bill that is so simple to pass and has 
broad support?
  It is because this bill was rewritten by the White House. This bill 
was rewritten so that not a woman but a man, and, frankly, a man with 
something of a questionable history toward women, would have the final 
say.
  By the way, if he didn't like the location that we have identified in 
this bill, he has a way to raise his objections called veto the bill. 
He could veto it if he didn't like the location, and then we would 
negotiate.
  The Article I prerogative of the Congress is to pass laws. That is 
what we should be doing, but what we have done is, we have managed to 
twist ourselves into a pretzel just to satisfy the President so that 
the President can look at the location that Congress by, law would, 
like to make clear and say: I don't like that after all. Sorry, 
Congress. Thank you for your input, but go away. I, Donald Trump, will 
decide unilaterally where the women's history museum will go. Forget 
about the 435 Members of the House. Forget about the 100 Members of the 
Senate. We appreciate your input, like little children. Now, go away. I 
will make the decision.
  That is what is going to happen. That is what this bill is. If that 
is not the case, I would love to hear a single word of explanation 
about why we are not doing the bill that has broad bipartisan support 
that specifically says where this museum will be located on The 
National Mall, on America's front yard.
  Why is that not the case? Why are we here? We can dance around it. We 
can talk about the contributions of women. Certainly, no one on this 
side of the aisle would ever, ever spend any time disputing that. We 
are in complete agreement, which is why we have over 100 sponsors for 
the bill on our side of the aisle, as well.
  The question is, and the question that people watching will want 
answered, is: Why aren't you doing that bill?
  I will be eagerly listening for an explanation as to why the 
bipartisan bill with 231 cosponsors, which specifically says where this 
museum should be, the exact location, and why we are not doing that 
bill.
  I will sit quietly and listen. Maybe not so quietly, but I will sit 
and listen. I am looking for one word of explanation about why that is 
not the case. Until that time, I will reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consume to the 
gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. De La Cruz) to speak on the bill.
  Ms. De La CRUZ. Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for yielding, and I 
thank Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis for working so hard to get this 
piece of legislation on the floor today.
  I stand proudly to support H.R. 1329, the bipartisan Smithsonian 
American Women's History Museum Act, as an original cosponsor.
  For 30 years, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have worked 
together to establish a space that carries on the legacy of the 
American women who fought tirelessly for our rights. It is absolutely 
unacceptable that any Member would oppose this bill because they want a 
biological male, a man, to be honored in the space designed for women, 
biological women.
  Any vote that opposes this legislation undermines every woman who 
fought for our right to vote, our right to own a home, our right to 
attend college, and even our right to own our paychecks.
  Ultimately, I represent a community that understands the difference 
between a man and a woman, a community that respects women, a community 
that will be proud that today and always they can count on me to stand 
up for biological women and stand up for common sense.
  Common sense, let's think about that. Let's think about common sense, 
which obviously my colleagues on the other side of the aisle do not 
have and lost along the way.
  Today, I will ``with pride''; ``con orgullo'' vote ``yes'' on this 
bill. I will vote ``yes'' on this legislation. I will vote ``yes'' for 
my ``grandmother''; ``abuelita,'' who is in Heaven smiling down, and 
``for my mother''; ``para mi mama,'' who is watching right now on C-
SPAN ``with pride''; ``con orgullo,'' watching her daughter speak on 
behalf of women here in America, to tell our story, to share 
our history, women's history.

  I will vote ``yes'' for this legislation. I will vote ``yes'' for 
biological women. Today, I will vote ``yes'' for common sense.
  Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  I appreciate the gentlewoman's comments. It is interesting she began 
her comments by citing the bipartisan bill that isn't before the House, 
the bipartisan bill that I am urging us to pass, the bipartisan bill 
that has over 100 sponsors on the Republican side of the aisle and over 
100 sponsors on the Democratic side of the aisle.
  She used that frame even though that is not the bill before the 
House. Of course, she could not offer an explanation as to why the bill 
that she cited actually isn't before the House, and instead, we have a 
hyperpartisan bill that gives Donald Trump unilateral power to decide 
where this museum is going.
  I would also note that among the rights that she talked about for 
women, the right to vote, et cetera, she didn't mention the right to 
control their own bodies. You know why? Because we have taken that away 
from women. This Supreme Court and this President have taken away the 
right of women so that my grandchildren, my granddaughters, have fewer 
rights than my mother did, than their grandmother and their great-
grandmother had. We didn't talk about that if we are going to talk 
about the rights of women and how important it is to support women in 
this country. We didn't talk about why this bill is going to end up 
with no museum being built because we insist on giving unilateral power 
to Donald Trump to decide all things that the Congress should be 
deciding.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from California 
(Ms. Chu).
  Ms. CHU. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to Republicans' 
partisan version of my previously bipartisan bill, the Smithsonian 
American Women's History Museum Act.
  Today should have been a celebration of success after years of 
bipartisan collaboration and good faith negotiations on a bill that I 
was proud to be a leader on, ensuring that women receive their rightful 
recognition in our Nation's Capital.
  Instead, Republicans threw all of that away by unilaterally making 
extremist changes to our once bipartisan bill, giving President Trump 
the power to decide the location, the design, and even the content of 
this museum.
  This completely undermines our bill's original intent. This museum is 
about honoring the prolific contributions that women have made to this

[[Page H3698]]

country. Instead, Republicans have disgraced this process and, 
embarrassingly, made it entirely about one man, Donald Trump.
  Mr. Speaker, women deserve better, and I urge my colleagues to vote 
``no.''

                              {time}  1400

  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, may I inquire how much time is remaining.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Guest). The gentleman from Wisconsin has 
13 minutes remaining.
  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consume to the 
gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Malliotakis), who is the author of the 
bill.
  Ms. MALLIOTAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I want to clarify some points and 
answer some of the questions of my colleague. This is like the good old 
times in the New York State Assembly. Mr. Morelle and I had fun 
debating there, as well.
  First of all, let me say that this bill is actually site-specific. It 
does include the quadrants of the site that was selected by the 
American Women's History Museum Advisory Council. The original version, 
which we have introduced, did not have those specific quadrants. It did 
not specify a specific site. It just allowed for a future selected site 
to be transferred.
  In that case, there was no clarity on what the site was, so we 
amended the bill to add the specific quadrants of the south Capitol 
site on The National Mall so it would be clear that it is the selected 
site of the museum's advisory council.
  Yes, it does give 180 days for the President, if necessary, to alter. 
That is because if, for some reason, there is a problem with that site, 
and it turns out we can't build on it, if the engineers come back and 
say that there is a problem, that it can't be built on, then we don't 
want to have to go through this entire process and have to pass another 
piece of legislation. We would just all work together to select a site 
that would be suitable.
  In terms of specificity, this bill actually gives more clarity on the 
location than the initial version.
  That is the only thing that has changed, that provision, as well as 
adding the sentence about ensuring that it is biological women. That 
was amended in the committee process.
  As I said, every piece of legislation is introduced here. We garnered 
230 cosponsors. It went to the committee. The committee went through 
regular order. Somebody had an amendment, and the amendment passed. 
Therefore, it was added. That was added as a result to ensure that 
there is clarity that only biological women would be represented in a 
women's museum.
  I also want to address this issue about the National Capital Planning 
Commission. This is not President Donald Trump's commission. This was a 
commission that was established over 100 years ago, in which the 
President gets only three appointees. The commission is a 12-member 
Federal body.
  Obviously, anything that is built as a Capital project goes through 
this commission. It is not as if it is a new commission that was set up 
by this particular President. Both this commission and the Fine Arts 
Commission were established well over a century ago, and the 12-member 
makeup of this is 3 appointees only by the President. That is not a 
majority. That is not giving the President unanimous control.
  The Mayor of Washington, D.C., gets an appointment. The chair of the 
D.C. Council gets an appointment. The House and Senate committee chairs 
with the D.C. jurisdiction, their committees get an appointment. The 
heads of the DOD, Interior, and GSA get an appointment. There are two 
mayoral appointees. That is the makeup of this.
  I know sometimes my colleagues on the other side may have a little 
difficulty with math. We see that during the budgeting, where they want 
to spend more than we can afford. Three is not the majority in a 
commission of 12.
  Please stop lying and saying that the commission is being controlled 
by one particular man. That is simply not the case.
  I just wanted to give those clarifying points.
  Again, I want to reiterate that I am very proud that it is the 
Republican Party that is putting forward this legislation. This was 
authorized, again, by President Trump in 2020. President Joe Biden had 
4 years to move this ball forward and to designate the land. He did not 
do it, so we are here today with the same President who authorized the 
women's museum, President Donald J. Trump.
  What I will say is that they claim, the other side, to be the party 
of women, yet it is the Republican Party that introduced the 19th 
Amendment and that passed the 19th Amendment. It was majority 
Republican-led States that ratified the 19th Amendment.
  Title IX is so important to women in our colleges, female athletes, 
and all educational programs. That was signed into law by a Republican 
President.
  Yes, it is a Republican President today who has authorized the 
women's history museum, and it will be a Republican majority in 
Congress that gets this done. That is because, for 4 years, the other 
side, when they had control, failed to do so.
  I still hope that this will be a bipartisan vote. It really should 
be. There is no reason for this not to come out of this House today and 
to celebrate the women of America.
  We can all be proud of women who have contributed from our respective 
States to the building of this Nation. As my colleague said, there have 
been so many struggles over the years, whether it be the right to vote 
or whether it be to apply for a credit card without needing a male 
cosigner. Women weren't allowed to be on a jury. They weren't allowed 
to attend a military academy. These are stories that need to be told.
  Sadly, the current generation and future generations may take a lot 
for granted. We don't know the history of the struggles that women have 
endured.
  Mr. Speaker, I hope that we can come out of this today with a 
bipartisan vote in support. Let's get this museum done, and let's do 
something that we can all be proud of as Americans.

  Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, may I inquire how much time remains.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New York has 9 minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, we could do this bill, get this done, and make clear 
where this museum is supposed to be. All we have to do is pass the 
bipartisan bill.
  If we want to amend it with this exact location, if that is what Ms. 
Malliotakis is suggesting, then I am happy to do that, but there are so 
many things that she said that I have to respond to.
  First of all, President Biden couldn't do this because Congress has 
created in the authorizing legislation this anomaly, so we need 
Congress to be able to specify the location, which is the point of the 
bipartisan bill, which has over 230 sponsors on both sides of the 
aisle. We could do that. This is simple, but that is not what is here.
  By the way, just to remind the gentlewoman in case she is not clear, 
the chairperson of the NCPC, which has responsibility here, the chair 
of that is the current White House staff secretary, William Scharf. It 
is the President's employee who runs it.
  By the way, anyone who believes that the President has much regard 
for the law or how these things should go should just look at the pile 
of rubble that is the East Wing of the White House, where the President 
defied tradition, common sense, and appropriateness and just knocked 
down one of the most historic sections of the most historic building in 
the world and is building it without anyone's contributions, without 
any appropriate guardrails, and without any appropriate oversight. That 
is because, let's face it, that is what this President does.
  Mr. Speaker, I do want to go back. I am sorry. I thought I read this 
into the Record, but just to be clear, if people think this is an exact 
location, then they should read it to the end. After we identify the 
site, it says: ``except that the President may designate an alternative 
site for the museum within 180 days of the date of the enactment of 
this subsection.''
  That is a little like when I was in high school, saying to my father: 
Can I stay out late? He would say: Yes, unless I say you can't. Does 
that mean I can stay out late? It only means I can stay out late if he 
gives me permission.
  We are going to put it at this site. We have it specifically here. 
Ms.

[[Page H3699]]

Malliotakis is right. There is an exact location, unless the President 
says that is not where he wants it.
  This is the Congress. Article I--when I first came to Washington, 
Article I, it must have been said 1,000 times in my first few weeks--
Article I prerogatives, the Congress, Article I, the first section of 
the Constitution, the legislative responsibilities herein lie with the 
Congress of the United States.
  Yet, what are we doing, Mr. Speaker? We are passing legislation, 
which the President does have the right to sign or veto, in which case, 
if he vetoes, it comes back here for further action by the Houses. He 
gets one bite at the apple, but we are not content with that. We have 
to then give him unilateral power over what we have just passed to do 
whatever he wants. It is insanity.
  There is no explanation for why we are not doing the original bill--
None. I am still listening, and I still haven't heard it.
  I will continue to listen for the explanation. Perhaps in the close 
by my colleagues and friends, we will hear why, finally, there is 
something wrong with passing the original bill.
  By the way, this isn't going to clear it up because this bill is not 
going to become law. I will tell you what, Mr. Speaker, in a new 
Congress, when there is a new majority, we will put the actual 
location. We will put it in law. We will send it to the President, and 
we will see whether or not he insists on not only a bill that has a 
location, but insists more on the power to unilaterally do whatever he 
wants.
  The only way this majority is willing to do anything in this House 
seems to be to ultimately give the power, complete power, to the 
President to do what he chooses to do without our input.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

                              {time}  1410

  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Speaker, do you want to know why I think so many Americans have 
given up on this institution? Think about what we are doing right now. 
Think about this debate. I hope people see it.
  We were handed something extremely rare in this building nowadays, a 
finished, bipartisan bill sponsored by more than half the Members with 
over 100 Members on both sides agreeing to it, and we lit it on fire. 
We have basically thrown it out and put it in a dumpster.
  And for what: to stroke the President's ego, to bully a vulnerable 
group of people who make up less than 1 percent of the population?
  The worst part is that we are doing it at a museum that is intended 
to honor women and the enormous contributions of women to this country 
who succeeded despite a government that failed them at times. They 
overcame great obstacles. We manufactured ours. They had every excuse 
to fail and made history anyway. They overcame those obstacles. We have 
no excuses. Yet, here we are on the verge of failing them, once again.
  They deserved better then and they deserve better now.
  Mr. Speaker, I implore my colleagues one last time: Stop with the 
games. Bring the bipartisan version of this bill to the floor, along 
with the Latino museum build so we can finally get shovels in the 
ground on The National Mall for these critically important museums and 
honor the amazing people in this country who have written the chapter 
of American history that we all stand on the shoulders of and whose 
legacy we enjoy.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge defeat of this bill. Bring back the bipartisan 
bill. We will enthusiastically build it. We will put shovels in the 
ground and we will build these national museums as they should be.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Speaker, I encourage my colleagues to support H.R. 1329, the 
Smithsonian American Women's History Museum Act, as introduced by my 
colleague Representative Malliotakis from New York.
  As we know, this year is the Nation's 250th anniversary, and we have 
an opportunity to place the Women's History Museum of the Smithsonian 
on The National Mall. The bill designates and takes an important step 
by designating the exact location of where that museum would be on The 
Mall and provides guardrails regarding the content of the museum.
  Mr. Speaker, I thank, again, my colleague Representative Malliotakis 
for her hard work on this issue. I encourage my colleagues to support 
this bill.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. All time for debate has expired.
  Pursuant to House Resolution 1300, the previous question is ordered 
on the bill, as amended.
  The question is on the engrossment and third reading of the bill.
  The bill was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, and was 
read the third time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, further 
consideration of H.R. 1329 is postponed.

                          ____________________