[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 82 (Thursday, May 14, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H3465-H3466]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SUPER TYPHOON SINLAKU RECOVERY IN NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
(Ms. King-Hinds of Northern Mariana Islands was recognized to address
the House for 5 minutes.)
Ms. KING-HINDS. Mr. Speaker, my district, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, is incredibly far from this Chamber, nearly
twice as far from Washington, D.C., as Moscow, Russia.
Yet, the distance between the Northern Mariana Islands and Washington
is
[[Page H3466]]
not measured only in miles. In many ways, our people are also living
with systems and conditions decades behind the rest of our country.
Power infrastructure built over 40 years ago struggles to stay online.
Water systems built generations ago are failing under the weight of
time. Long before Super Typhoon Sinlaku struck our islands this year,
our economy was already under extraordinary strain.
Tourism had not recovered. Businesses were closing. Families were
leaving. Air service was shrinking. Government revenues were
collapsing.
Mr. Speaker, this did not happen in a vacuum. For decades, Federal
policies toward the territories, while often well-intentioned, have too
often operated as barriers instead of bridges to long-term
economic sufficiency.
One-size-fits-all Federal policies may work on the mainland, but they
do not work for small, remote-island economies in the middle of the
Pacific Ocean.
When transportation policies fail to account for isolation, we pay
more. When healthcare systems fail to account for remoteness, people
leave. When economic policies fail to account for the fact that tourism
is our customer base, entire industries collapse.
When Federal systems are built around the assumption that every
community has the same market access and the same economic flexibility,
places like the Northern Mariana Islands are left trying to survive
under rules that were never truly designed for us.
Then, Super Typhoon Sinlaku arrived.
Mr. Speaker, we are now weeks into a territory-wide recovery
emergency across Saipan, Tinian, and Rota. More than 5,000 residents
have already registered for FEMA individual assistance. Nearly half of
surveyed households suffered major or catastrophic housing damage.
Entire islands lost power. Water systems failed. Hospitals, schools,
sports, airports, and government facilities were forced into emergency
operations.
While national media attention has already begun moving on, the
people living this reality did not have the luxury of changing the
channel because, for us, this is not a headline. This is home.
Thankfully, recovery is happening, but, Mr. Speaker, disasters do not
create weaknesses out of nowhere. They expose the weakness that already
exists. When a community has spent years operating at the edge, even a
single storm can push entire systems toward failure.
The Indo-Pacific is often discussed through the lens of strategic
competition and force projection, but national resilience in the
Pacific also depends on whether American communities in the region
remain economically and socially viable.
A collapsing utility system is a national security issue. A
collapsing transportation system is a national security issue. The
inability of American territories to sustain population, workforce, and
economic activity in a strategically important region is a national
security issue.
If we are serious about maintaining a durable American presence in
the Indo-Pacific, then we must also be serious about the long-term
viability of the American communities already living there.
In the coming weeks, I will be working with my colleagues, Federal
agencies, and the administration on proposals aimed at addressing the
underlying vulnerabilities this disaster has exposed because we cannot
simply rebuild to what existed before. We must build systems that are
stronger, more flexible, and actually designed to give communities like
ours a chance to survive and grow.
Mr. Speaker, at the beginning, I mentioned that the Northern Mariana
Islands live a day ahead of the rest of the country. Sometimes, it also
feels like communities like mine experience America's future first.
What happens when infrastructure ages beyond sustainability? What
happens when economic systems become too fragile to absorb disruption?
What happens when communities lose the flexibility to respond to their
own realities because the systems governing them have become too
distant and too rigid?
In the Northern Mariana Islands, those pressures arrive earlier and
more visibly because we are small, remote, and heavily dependent on
decisions that are made here, but the lesson is not unique to the
Pacific. A country as large and diverse as the United States cannot
remain strong if every community is treated as though it faces the same
conditions, the same constraints, and the same path forward.
{time} 1115
Recovery is not only about debris removal and emergency response. It
is about whether American communities still have a future once the
cameras leave and the attention moves on. For the people of the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands that question is
immediate. It is urgent, and it deserves the attention of Congress.
____________________