[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 81 (Wednesday, May 13, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2271-S2272]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROVIDING FOR CONGRESSIONAL DISAPPROVAL UNDER CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE 5,
UNITED STATES CODE, OF THE RULE SUBMITTED BY THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER
FINANCIAL PROTECTION RELATING TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE RULE RELATING TO
``STATEMENT OF POLICY REGARDING PROHIBITION ON ABUSIVE ACTS OR
PRACTICES''--Motion to Proceed
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I move to proceed to Calendar No. 395,
S.J. Res. 147.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the motion.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
Motion to proceed to Calendar No. 395, S.J. Res. 147, a
joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval
under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to
``Statement of Policy Regarding Prohibition on Abusive Acts
or Practices''.
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I was proud in 2008 during the financial
crisis facing this country to join a majority of Senators in creating
the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. This Bureau has been a
watchdog for consumers ever since.
Congress took steps to strengthen consumer protection laws after this
crisis which centered on mortgage lenders profiting on loans doomed to
fail. Millions of Americans lost their homes. The unemployment rate was
10 percent.
Shortly after, Congress passed this Consumer Financial Protection Act
to address consumer protection failures and to ban abusive financial
conduct to ensure fair dealing and protect consumers.
The CFPB issued guidance on what constitutes financial abuse, warning
bad actors, and making it easy to enforce the law.
In 2023, the Biden CFPB issued a policy statement that spelled out by
legal definition the abusive conduct and provided summaries and
explanations as how to analyze the abusers. For example, the CFPB
explained that abusive practices include obscuring or withholding
information on mortgages in a
[[Page S2272]]
way that makes it difficult for consumers to understand them--same
thing for credit card agreements, same thing for financial contracts
and for student loans. The guidance warned bad actors about engaging in
these practices and deterring abusive conduct, making it easier to
bring enforcement actions when it occurs. The Trump administration
withdrew this guidance and protection, and this JRD seeks to restore
it.
Now, I ask those who want to stand up for families that are
struggling with their expenses today to vote yes and those who want to
approve of low-rent, bottom-feeder, sleazy conduct by cheaters to vote
no.
Vote on Motion to Proceed
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the motion to
proceed.
In the opinion of the Chair, the noes have it.
The motion was rejected.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Vermont.
____________________