[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 76 (Thursday, April 30, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2159-S2160]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWNS
Mr. LANKFORD. Mr. President, I don't know if you remember 1977. But
since 1977, this body has passed the 12 appropriation bills on time 4
times since 1977. By the way, this year is not one of them. Since 1977,
four times the budget process has worked correctly.
We have had multiple different government shutdowns during that time
period, but they are getting worse--not better, as this Congress
continues to be able to find cliffs to be able to stand next to and
figure out how long we can put our toes over the edge.
The latest one ended today. It was 76 days long, and it shut down the
Department of Homeland Security. Now, I remind everyone in this body,
the first priority of the U.S. Government is defense and security--the
first priority.
This body decided not to fund Homeland Security for 76 days. This is
an issue we have got to face.
In 2019, my friend Maggie Hassan the Democratic Senator from New
Hampshire, she and I sat down and said: We have got to figure out how
to get out of this. This is a cycle that is continuing.
And since 2019, she and I have worked across the aisle to convince
our colleagues there is a way to prevent future government shutdowns
that would hold Congress accountable but the American people and
Federal workers would not feel the effect of it. And it is a very
simple straightforward idea that we have worked on now since 2019. It
is when this body has not finished their work on time, we stay until
the work is finished.
But Federal workers and their families and the programs that are all
connected to those Federal dollars, they continue. They are held
harmless, while we have to stay until it is done.
Now, that may seem simple, but around this place, that is a radical
idea, apparently. We have worked for years to be able to get to the
point that we can pass it.
Last session, we brought it to this body and had 57 votes; we need
60, as this body knows full well. We had 57 supporters last time we
brought it to this body.
Now, there has been an election since then. We have also had two very
long shutdowns since then, and my understanding is there are even more
of my colleagues that are stepping forward and saying it is time that
we end the shutdown dramas and actually get things resolved.
We don't bring a political solution; we don't bring a messaging
solution; we just bring a solution. This solution had been evaluated in
previous Presidential time by President Biden's team
[[Page S2160]]
in his Office of Management and Budget. It has been reviewed by now
President Trump's team, his Office of Management and Budget. Everyone
has looked at it and said: Yep, that works.
We have gone through all the technical assistance on it, and now it
is time to vote to be able to figure out if once and for all we can end
government shutdowns.
Now, the idea, as I mentioned, is simple: We stay here until the work
is done. But let me give you an example of what that would look like
just in this shutdown. This particular shutdown with Homeland Security,
we were shut down for 76 days because my Democratic colleagues did not
want to fund ICE or Border Protection, so we had a 76-day shutdown.
During that 76-day time period, the Senate was in session 35 of those
days--less than half. For 76 days, the Department of Homeland Security
was nonoperable, unfunded. We were here 35 of those days. If you think
that is bad, let's talk about the House of Representatives. They were
in session 29 of those 76 days. In other words, the problem was all
over the country, and Congress was AWOL.
We have to determine if we are going to stay and fix the problem, or
if weekend plans or time away from here is more important than Homeland
Security of all things. We should have never left.
When we ran out of funding, we should have remained until we solved
the problem, but everybody left. Let's fix that. Let's make the most
simple commitment that we can possibly make to the American people, and
that is, if we get to a moment like this again--and we will--we will
not leave until the work is done.
Federal workers will not have to worry about not being paid.
Contractors will not have to worry about not being paid. Programs will
be able to continue to operate. We are the ones that will actually have
to stay after class. They won't feel it there. That seems to be a much
better option than mass chaos across the country while we suffer no
consequences for it.
Now, there has been a lot of conversation in this body, which has
been good, to be able to talk about how do we actually not have this
happen again. Part of the conversation has been: Let's just pay the
employees and not pay the programming but we can still continue to be
able to leave and come and go like normal but at least people will be
paid.
Interestingly enough, we have had an experiment with that, that exact
principle for the last month. For the last month, President Trump has
taken some of the emergency funding set aside in the bill we passed
last year in reconciliation, has used that to be able to pay employees.
So employees of Homeland Security have been paid, but the programming
hasn't been done. So literally we have had a test run on that idea.
What if we just paid the employees but didn't pay the programming,
wouldn't that solve the problem? What has now been discovered is: Oh,
no, that definitely doesn't solve the problem.
CBS News has reported in the last 24 hours that we now have up to
6,000 different residences for just the Coast Guard that their power is
being shut off because the bills haven't been paid for the last 2
months. And, amazingly enough, utility folks like to be paid--
remarkable.
We have got the Commandant of the Coast Guard who came out and made a
statement that was pretty bold for the Commandant to be able to make,
but he is dead-on correct. The Commandant of the Coast Guard made this
statement about the ongoing shutdown right now of Homeland Security
including the U.S. Coast Guard. He said:
It's more than a breach of trust . . . Our Coast Guard men
and women, whether they're active duty or reserve military
civilians, they've stepped forward and taken an oath to
support and defend the Constitution. What they expect in
return is just to be paid and [to] provide services.
They don't expect ``to have to worry about whether their families are
going to be taken care of.''
By the way, this is the same commandant at his residence as
Commandant of the Coast Guard the power was shut off because the bills
hadn't been paid. If you want to go to the Coast Guard station in
Hawaii, they were literally working at the station by flashlight.
Now, everybody was being paid, but contracts weren't being paid,
contractors were not being paid, and program dollars were not done.
What does that mean? Simple things, like in FEMA, all the fire
training centers, all the domestic preparedness conferences, all the
things that we do to be able to prepare for a hurricane coming up this
fall, those things couldn't happen. All the work to be able to prepare
for wildfires, none of that could actually happen. For our
Cybersecurity professionals, while we have an ongoing conflict with
Iran, many were furloughed or couldn't do their work. While we were
preparing for FIFA, for literally the whole world coming to the United
States, we couldn't do preparation for security for them coming.
The United States Secret Service, who put their lives on the line to
be able to protect the President, much of the executive branch and
reporters this past weekend at the White House Correspondents' Dinner--
thank you for the work that you were doing--but they had no additional
money to be able to plan and operate because this body chose to go home
rather than fund them.
Listen, there is a simple way to be able to resolve this for all of
us: We stay until the work gets done. And simply saying: We will pay
people but then walk away doesn't solve the problem because contractors
don't get paid, utility bills don't get paid, all the grants don't get
done, the other tasks are still not there. So just paying the employees
but they can't do anything doesn't solve the problem. It just pays
people that are sitting at a desk, wishing they could do their job, but
they have no money to do it, or in this case, for the Coast Guard, they
are working at their station by flashlight.
That should not be so in the United States of America. This is not a
partisan bill. It is not even a partisan issue. Republicans and
Democrats alike have put a stake in the ground and said: We are going
to shut the government down because we are mad. We have both done it on
both sides. Let's just say we are done with it.
What I would like to happen in the days ahead, years from now, to
have my grandchildren crawl up in my lap and say: Tell me a story about
the time when the government used to shut down--because it never
happens in their generation. Let's find a way to be able to actually
resolve this like grownups, work out our differences, and not have
government shutdowns.
I want to thank my colleague Maggie Hassan and her work for this and
what she has done to be able to get the text right and to be able to
get this resolved.
I want to thank my colleagues in the House that had the exact same
text: Jodey Arrington, Jimmy Panetta.
In a bipartisan basis and bicameral basis, we are dedicated to saying
government shutdowns need to end. So I am looking forward to us getting
this finally, finally resolved.
I yield the floor.
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________