[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 29, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2102-S2103]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
S.J. RES. 139
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, I am speaking in advance of my
colleague from Colorado Senator Bennet's effort to seek redress in this
body for a wave of pollution that is being unleashed in his State and
neighboring States as well.
One of the things about our failed Environmental Protection Agency
right now is that one State can't regulate pollution that comes to it
from another State. And yet the good neighbor policy that somebody has
to be able to say ``Hey, wait a minute; you can't pollute my State from
another State'' is one that EPA has just walked away from.
In this case, the problem is a coal facility in Colorado. And just
start with coal. It is really indisputable that coal is America's
dirtiest, deadliest, and most expensive energy source. It is a dying
industry for market reasons. It can't compete because it is dirty,
deadly, and expensive.
And yet, since taking office, President Trump has worked desperately
to keep coal on life support, perhaps because the coal industry paid
$3.5 million in 2024 to help him get elected, and Trump is a man who
understands a quid pro quo.
The Trump administration has taken every possible action to benefit
the coal industry; never mind our health. Remember, it is the deadliest
of energy sources. And never mind our bank accounts. Remember, it is
the most expensive of energy sources.
He even rolled back health-protecting standards for mercury and toxic
emissions from coal plants. Mercury is pretty seriously, deadly stuff;
and he rolled back those standards.
He exempted one-third of all coal plants nationwide from toxic
pollution standards. Who loses? Anybody exposed to the toxic pollution
they emit. Who wins? Trump's big donors.
He even directed the Secretary of Energy to issue orders under the
Federal Power Act to force coal plants to stay online, driving up
consumer costs against the wishes of the utilities and even the plants'
owners. But they still had to buy and burn coal. So there is somebody
out there who is going to make money off that.
And now Trump has perverted the Clean Air Act to trample on States'
rights to protect their own citizens.
Coal plants are the Nation's most significant source of haze. The
same coal pollutants that drive health issues and deaths nationwide
drive haze formations. Under the Clean Air Act's Regional Haze Program,
States establish plans to reduce haze-causing pollution. States may
choose to include coal plant retirements in their plans. Often, that is
consistent with the utility and the plant owner's wishes, as an old
plant ends its useful life. When the EPA approves these plans, the
retirements then become enforceable.
In 2022, Colorado submitted a regional haze plan to the EPA that
included coal plant retirements that Colorado utilities had
independently and voluntarily planned for. ``They do better with
cheaper, cleaner renewable energy'' is the simple answer.
In January of this year, the EPA turned around and disapproved
Colorado's plan, making the argument that Colorado's plan, voluntarily
entered into with these utilities, could represent a ``taking'' under
the Constitution.
So we have here a really flagrant abuse of Federal authority: Make it
more difficult for Colorado to protect its own citizens from toxic
pollution and to provide affordable energy. And the resulting pollution
won't just endanger Coloradans. This is a national issue because the
haze blows, with prevailing winds, toward eastern States.
My State of Rhode Island, for instance, has occasions when we have
bad air days. And if you are driving into work in the morning and you
are listening to the talk radio, they will say: Today is a bad air day.
Children should stay home. Elderly people and people with breathing
difficulties should not go out.
It looks like a beautiful summer day. Kids will want to be in the
yard, but it
[[Page S2103]]
is a bad air day. And so that health warning gets issued by the State
of Rhode Island.
And there is nothing the State of Rhode Island can do about it. If
every car in our State was an EV, if everything ran off of clean
electricity, we would still be out of compliance because we are a
downwind State.
And huge powerplants that push their pollution up into the sky, far
enough that prevailing winds carries it out of their State and onto
ours, they are the ones that are to blame, and there is nothing we can
do about it.
So I am very sympathetic to concerns that the EPA has a particularly
important job when neighboring States are polluting one another and
can't reach a regulatory solution because it is out of State, and that
is exactly the predicament that we are creating here today.
When Congress enacted the Congressional Review Act in 1996 to give
Congress the opportunity to vote on regulations, well, that is why we
are here today. We have a chance to undo this, and I hope we will
because everybody here has a good chance of being a downwind State.
Even California is often a downwind State from China. So you have got
to be able to have protections from upwind pollution, and this would
strip that.
So the Trump administration's effort here--at breakneck speed--to
tear down protections of Americans' health, safety, and environment we
have a chance to claw back. Congressional Review Act resolutions like
this one can help hold the administration to account.
I will conclude by saying I just left the EPW hearing with EPA
Administrator Zeldin. The point that I made in that hearing was that we
are now headed into an election cycle in which the American people are
desperately concerned about the cost of stuff. Stuff costs too much,
and the Trump administration is ignoring the problem, if not making it
worse. Those are basically the two buckets. They are either ignoring it
completely or they are deliberately making it worse.
With respect to electricity costs, the Trump administration is
deliberately making it worse. They are raising costs for consumers on
purpose.
How are they doing it, and why are they doing it? Well, the ``how''
is that they are keeping inexpensive clean energy off the grid. We just
went through this in Rhode Island. Our Revolution Wind offshore power
facility was stalled by illegal orders of the Trump administration not
once but twice, and the result was that power was delayed from coming
ashore. Well, Revolution Wind has a contract to sell power onto the
grid. That contract specifies a price. The price is 9 cents--9 cents.
ISO New England--our grid operator--can do fairly easy math to show
what the average grid price is for electricity. And guess what. It is
18 cents. So this 9-cent power was stalled going into an 18-cent grid.
Because it is 9-cent power, what would it have done? It would have
been called up first by the grid because every grid calls up the least
expensive power first. So that 9-cent power would have been flowing
into the grid. It would have been filling up demand, and that would
have meant that some dirty fossil fuel-polluting units would not have
been called up. They were too expensive to run.
So, when they push all that clean energy off the grid and buy time
for the dirty, polluting fossil fuel plants--that is money directly to
the fossil fuel industry--two things happen: One, costs go up for all
consumers because those new, more expensive plants called online raise
the price for everybody. So electricity bills go up. They are driven up
on purpose by the delay of clean energy getting onto the grid.
Where do those billions of dollars in extra costs that are extracted
from American consumers go? Guess where--to the owners of those fossil
fuel plants that are in the margin, the ones that get run because the
clean energy has been kept off of the grid.
It is a ginormous money pump out of the pockets of ordinary American
ratepayers and into the pockets of the fossil fuel billionaires who put
so much money into getting Trump elected. That is being done on
purpose. Electricity costs are being driven up on purpose.
Don't tell me that the Department of Energy or the Environmental
Protection Agency or the Department of the Interior, for that matter,
don't understand how the grid works. They have people who know exactly
how the generation stack works. They know exactly that the least
expensive units get run first and that the least expensive units
displace the more expensive units, which is good for consumers, until
the heavy hand of a fossil fuel-influenced government steps in and
tries to prevent consumers from getting low-cost clean energy. Then the
hole that that leaves that would have been filled by clean energy--you
have got to go fill that hole by going up the stack to more and more
expensive units, and virtually every time, that more expensive unit is
a fossil fuel unit.
So, like I said, what the Trump administration has created on purpose
is a ginormous money pump to extract billions of dollars from regular
consumers who would otherwise be enjoying the benefit of low-cost clean
power, and they have done it as a reward for Trump's big fossil fuel
donors, the ones who threw hundreds of millions of dollars at his
campaign and who are now reaping a multiple-times reward with that
investment.
With that, I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Schmitt). The Senator from Colorado.
____________________