[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 29, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H3137-H3147]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 7567, FARM, FOOD, AND NATIONAL
SECURITY ACT OF 2026; PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2616,
PARENTAL RIGHTS OVER THE EDUCATION AND CARE OF THEIR KIDS ACT;
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF S. CON. RES. 33, CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026; PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF S.
1318, FALLEN SERVICE MEMBERS RELIGIOUS HERITAGE RESTORATION ACT;
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1346, NATIONWIDE CONSUMER AND FUEL
RETAILER CHOICE ACT OF 2025; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, by direction of the
Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 1224 and ask for its
immediate consideration.
The Clerk read the resolution, as follows:
H. Res. 1224
Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this
resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule
XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the
Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of
the bill (H.R. 7567) to provide for the reform and
continuation of agricultural and other programs of the
Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2031, and for
other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of
the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the
bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the
Committee on Agriculture or their respective designees. After
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment
under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the amendment in the
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on
Agriculture now printed in the bill, an amendment in the
nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules
Committee Print 119-22, modified by the amendment printed in
part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying
this resolution, shall be considered as adopted in the House
and in the Committee of the Whole. The bill, as amended,
shall be considered as the original bill for the purpose of
further amendment under the five-minute rule and shall be
considered as read. All points of order against provisions in
the bill, as amended, are waived.
Sec. 2. (a) No further amendment to H.R. 7567, as amended,
shall be in order except those printed in part B of the
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution
and amendments en bloc described in section 3 of this
resolution.
(b) Each further amendment printed in part B of the report
of the Committee on Rules shall be considered only in the
order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member
designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall
be debatable for the time specified in the report equally
divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent,
shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject
to a demand for division of the question in the House or in
the Committee of the Whole.
(c) All points of order against further amendments printed
in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules or against
amendments en bloc described in section 3 of this resolution
are waived.
Sec. 3. It shall be in order at any time for the chair of
the Committee on Agriculture or his designee to offer
amendments en bloc consisting of further amendments printed
in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules
accompanying this resolution not earlier disposed of.
Amendments en bloc offered pursuant to this section shall be
considered as read, shall be debatable for 20 minutes equally
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority
member of the Committee on Agriculture or their respective
designees, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the
House or in the Committee of the Whole.
Sec. 4. At the conclusion of consideration of H.R. 7567
for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill,
as amended, to the House with such further amendments as may
have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered
as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion
except one motion to recommit.
Sec. 5. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2616) to
require public elementary and middle schools that receive
funds under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of
1965 to obtain parental consent before changing a minor's
gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school
form or sex-based accommodations, including locker rooms or
bathrooms. All points of order against consideration of the
bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a
substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and
Workforce now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature
of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee
Print 119-26 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order
against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,
as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of
debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and
ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and
Workforce or their respective designees; and (2) one motion
to recommit.
Sec. 6. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in
order to consider in the House the concurrent resolution (S.
Con. Res. 33) setting forth the congressional budget for the
United States Government for fiscal year 2026 and setting
forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027
through 2035. All points of order against consideration of
the concurrent resolution are waived. The concurrent
resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order
against provisions in the concurrent resolution are waived.
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the
concurrent resolution to adoption without intervening motion
or demand for division of the question except one hour of
debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget or
their respective designees.
Sec. 7. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in
order to consider in the House the bill (S. 1318) to direct
the American Battle Monuments Commission to establish a
program to identify American-Jewish servicemembers buried in
United States military cemeteries overseas under markers that
incorrectly represent their religion and heritage, and for
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of
the bill are waived. An amendment in the nature of a
substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print
119-27, modified by the amendment printed in part C of the
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this
resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order
against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill,
as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of
debate equally divided among and controlled by the chair and
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary or
their respective designees and the chair and ranking minority
member of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence or
their respective designees; and (2) one motion to commit.
Sec. 8. In the engrossment of the House amendment to S.
1318, the Clerk shall--
(a) add the text of H.R. 1919, as passed by the House, as
new matter at the end of the text proposed to be inserted by
the House amendment;
(b) assign appropriate designations to provisions within
the engrossment of the text proposed to be inserted by the
House;
(c) conform cross-references and provisions for short
titles within the engrossment of the text proposed to be
inserted by the House; and
(d) be authorized to make technical corrections, to include
corrections in spelling, punctuation, page and line
numbering, section numbering, and insertion of appropriate
headings within the engrossment of the text proposed to be
inserted by the House.
Sec. 9. It shall be in order at any time through the
legislative day of May 1, 2026, for the Speaker to entertain
motions that the House suspend the rules as though under
clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee shall
consult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the
designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this
section.
Sec. 10. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1346) to amend
the Clean Air Act with respect to the ethanol waiver for Reid
Vapor Pressure under that Act, and for other purposes. All
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived.
An amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the
text of Rules Committee Print 119-28 shall be considered as
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read.
All points of order against provisions in the bill, as
amended, are waived. The previous question shall be
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any
further amendment thereto, to final passage without
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority
member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce or their
respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
Sec. 11. In the engrossment of H.R. 7567, the Clerk
shall--
(a) await the disposition of H.R. 1346;
(b) add the text of H.R. 1346, as passed by the House, as
new matter at the end of H.R. 7567;
(c) assign appropriate designations to provisions within
the engrossment;
(d) conform cross-references and provisions for short
titles within the engrossment; and
(e) be authorized to make technical corrections, to include
corrections in spelling, punctuation, page and line
numbering, section numbering, and insertion of appropriate
headings within the engrossment.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Georgia is recognized for
1 hour.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate
[[Page H3138]]
only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to the gentleman from
Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern), pending which I yield myself such time as
I may consume. During consideration of this resolution, all time
yielded is for the purpose of debate only.
{time} 0920
General Leave
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent
that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their
remarks.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Georgia?
There was no objection.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as
I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, last night the Rules Committee met and reported a rule,
House Resolution 1224, providing for consideration of H.R. 7567, the
Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, to be considered under a
structured rule.
The rule provides for 1 hour of debate, equally divided and
controlled by the chair and ranking member of the Committee on
Agriculture or their respective designees, provides for one motion to
recommit, and makes 57 amendments in order.
The rule provides for consideration of S. 1318, the Foreign
Intelligence Accountability Act, to be considered under a closed rule.
The rule provides for 1 hour of debate, equally divided among and
controlled by the chair and ranking member of the Committee on the
Judiciary or their respective designees and the chair and ranking
member of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence or their
respective designees, and provides one motion to commit.
The rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2616, the Stopping
Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act, to be considered under a closed
rule. The rule provides for 1 hour of debate equally divided and
controlled by the chair and ranking member of the Committee on
Education and Workforce or their respective designees and provides one
motion to recommit.
The rule provides for consideration of S. Con. Res. 33, setting forth
the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal
year 2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal
years 2027 through 2035 to be considered under a closed rule. The rule
provides for 1 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the
chair and ranking member of the Committee on the Budget or their
respective designees.
Finally, the rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1346, the
Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025, to be
considered under a closed rule. The rule provides for 1 hour of debate
equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking member of the
Committee on Energy and Commerce or their respective designees and
provides one motion to recommit.
Additionally, the rule provides that in the engrossment of H.R. 7567,
the clerk shall add the text of H.R. 1346, should it pass the House, as
new matter at the end of H.R. 7567.
The rule also provides that in the engrossment of S. 1318, the clerk
shall add the text of H.R. 1919, as passed by the House, as new matter
at the end of the House amendment to S. 1318.
Finally, the rule allows the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend
the rules at any time through the legislative day on May 1, 2026.
Mr. Speaker, we are here today to debate the rule on five pieces of
legislation, beginning with H.R. 7567, the Farm, Food, and National
Security Act of 2026.
Mr. Speaker, our country's farmers and ranchers are currently
experiencing years of high input costs, shrinking margins, and
uncertainty heading into the growing season. Misguided policy decisions
from the previous administration have led to overregulation and
consolidation, leaving the American producer to pay the price.
However, Mr. Speaker, through the body's work on H.R. 1, we achieved
the first meaningful investments in the farm safety net since 2002, we
brought integrity back to our nutrition programs, and we provided
relief to our farming families through tax cuts.
H.R. 7567 builds on the accomplishments of H.R. 1 and completes the
long-delayed farm bill process, addressing the remaining farm country
needs. H.R. 7567 reinforces the farm safety net, allowing our producers
the certainty they need to endure unpredictable markets, volatile
weather, and rising input costs.
Strengthening ARC and PLC, expanding disaster assistance tools, and
improving support for specialty crops gives producers the stability
needed to keep producing the safest, most abundant food supply in the
world.
The bill reaffirms our Nation's commitment to locally led, science-
based conservation practices through improvements to programs like
EQIP, CSP, and CRP. Promoting precision agriculture and science-based
practices helps protect our natural resources while keeping working
lands productive for generations to come.
Additionally, H.R. 7567 modernizes trade and global food assistance,
codifying the move of the Food for Peace program to the USDA.
Streamlining Food for Peace authorities and reinvesting in proven
export promotion programs strengthens U.S. competitiveness abroad,
while ensuring American commodities remain central to feeding
vulnerable populations worldwide.
{time} 0930
H.R. 7567 bolsters the future of American agriculture by improving
access to farm credit, especially for those beginning, young, and small
farmers. This farm bill ensures they have the capital they need to
build and sustain their operations.
Mr. Speaker, this bill is centered on affordability and is a win for
rural America. Investments in broadband, childcare, healthcare,
workforce needs, and critical water and infrastructure projects
strengthen our rural communities and give them the support to thrive in
the years to come.
The Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 delivers for our
producers, strengthens our rural communities, and protects the security
of America's food supply.
This is thoughtful legislation that has culminated from years of
listening to farmers, ranchers, and families across our country in
response to current realities with real solutions.
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleagues and all the staff for the work
that went into the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, and I
urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this legislation.
Moving on to S. 1318, the Foreign Intelligence Accountability Act,
Mr. Speaker, this would authorize section 702 for 3 years. I will be
clear: We cannot allow section 702 to expire at a moment when our
adversaries are expanding their capabilities, accelerating their
operations, and exploiting every gap in our intelligence posture.
Allowing this authority to expire would leave the United States blind
to threats that move at the speed of the modern conflict. Section 702
allows the United States Government to collect intelligence on foreign
nationals located overseas--I repeat, foreign nationals located
overseas--who are reasonably believed to possess foreign intelligence
information.
The FBI can only access FISA 702 data if the foreign section 702
target is relevant to an existing, open, predicated, full national
security investigation. Section 702 cannot be used to target any U.S.
person at home or abroad. That prohibition is explicit and reinforced
by multiple layers of oversight.
While section 702 was first authorized in 2008 and has been
reauthorized since with bipartisan support, it certainly has not been
perfect. To account for needed reforms, Congress passed the Reforming
Intelligence and Securing America Act in 2024, the largest FBI and FISA
reform in decades.
This law mandated 56 different reforms, including strict limitations
on FBI queries involving U.S. persons and a severe reduction in the
number of FBI personnel with access to 702 data.
Additionally, to address concerns about the FBI's compliance on U.S.
person queries, RISAA required the Bureau to provide an annual report
detailing any noncompliant queries and what accountability measures
were imposed on each FBI person who was determined to have conducted a
noncompliant query.
This has led to 100 percent of queries on U.S. persons being reviewed
by the
[[Page H3139]]
National Security Division and the FBI's Office of Internal Auditing.
These reforms were not symbolic. They were structural, enforceable, and
designed to ensure that section 702 remains both effective and
accountable.
A quick example of effectiveness can be seen when comparing 2021 FBI
queries, which numbered 2.9 million, to 2025 queries, which numbered
7,413.
Furthermore, Mr. Speaker, this bill contains additional reforms that
Congress has worked to include over the last few weeks. Failing to
reauthorize this authority, which allows us to stop terrorist attacks
on United States soil, would be a massive setback, one that our
adversaries would exploit immediately.
The time is now to reauthorize section 702.
Next, Mr. Speaker, we have H.R. 2616, the Stopping Indoctrination and
Protecting Kids Act. This legislation addressed an important issue
facing our country today: protecting a parent's right to be informed
and involved in conversations regarding their children's education and
what is happening inside their classrooms.
The Stopping Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act does that. It
would prohibit any federally funded public elementary or middle school
from changing a child's name, pronoun, or access to facilities such as
bathrooms or locker rooms without parental consent.
Again, Mr. Speaker, we are talking about elementary and middle
schools. This legislation emphasizes the fundamental role of parents in
making sensitive decisions regarding their children's identity and
accommodations in school. This legislation responds to recent
developments across the country where parental rights are being
trampled on in favor of a progressive agenda that is completely out of
touch with the average American family.
This is an urgent moment for Congress to stand up for parents and
children and to reinforce the critical need for parental engagement and
awareness in their child's education. I urge my colleagues to support
this legislation.
Additionally, Mr. Speaker, we have S. Con. Res. 33, setting forth the
congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year
2026 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal
years 2027 through 2035.
This legislation would unlock the budget reconciliation process to
fully fund both Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and
Border Protection through early 2029, continuing to deliver on the GOP-
led Congress' promise to ensure our borders are secure and the brave
men and women of ICE and CBP have the necessary resources to do so.
Over the last 18 months, President Trump has delivered on his promise
to America to secure the southern border, deport violent illegal
aliens, and support the law enforcement officers at Immigration and
Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection.
These officers work tirelessly to secure our borders and ensure
Americans remain safe from foreign threats. It is time for Congress to
do the same.
Finally, Mr. Speaker, we have H.R. 1346, the Nationwide Consumer and
Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025. This legislation allows the option to
sell gasoline that is blended with 10 percent to 15 percent ethanol
year-round. Furthermore, it provides additional reforms to the
renewable fuel standard.
Mr. Speaker, I look forward to the consideration of these important
points of legislation, and I urge passage of this rule.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Georgia for
yielding me the customary 30 minutes, and I yield myself such time as I
may consume.
Another week, Mr. Speaker, another chance for this Republican
majority to show the American people what they actually care about.
Once again, sadly, it is not affordability. It is not lowering prices.
It is not the issues that my constituents raise with me at townhalls
back home.
For 16 long, long months, Republicans have controlled the House, the
Senate, and the White House. Republicans have been running the show for
over a year now, and what have they done?
Have they lowered prices? Not grocery prices; those are up. Not gas
prices; those are up, too. Not healthcare costs; those are up, too. Not
utilities or childcare; those are more expensive than ever.
That is the problem with winning power, Mr. Speaker. At some point,
the problems you complain about become your problems, and if you fail
to fix them, then that failure is yours. That is where this Republican
majority finds itself.
You guys have failed to deliver big time.
Donald Trump promised he would end the war in Ukraine. Not only did
he fail to do that, he started a new one in Iran.
Republicans promised they would lower prices on day one. We are now
in year 2, and where are prices? They are not down. They are up, way
up. Ground beef, vegetables, fruit, sugar, it is all up, according to
Trump's own USDA.
Whose fault is it? Democrats did not start the war with Iran that is
driving up food and gas prices. Republicans did that. It wasn't Biden
who put in place tariffs that are hurting American farmers and jacking
up costs. Republicans did that. The left did not give massive tax
breaks to billionaires paid for by stealing from the program working
families use to buy groceries. Republicans did that.
This administration and Republicans in Congress spent years claiming
Democrats drove up prices and promising they would bring them down on
day one. They failed. If you want to know why, look no further than the
bills on the floor this week.
It is a greatest hits album of MAGA extremism, corporate giveaways,
and political theater: a culture war bill targeting trans kids; a
budget resolution that moves Heaven and Earth to give even more money
to ICE and CBP while FEMA, TSA, and the Coast Guard remain shut down
because Speaker Johnson refuses to advance a bipartisan Senate
agreement that would pass overwhelmingly if brought to the floor; a
FISA bill that lets the government spy on Americans without proper
warrant safeguards; and a farm bill that locks in long-term cuts to
SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, after Trump's big, ugly bill stole
nearly $200 billion from the program in order to give tax breaks to
billionaires.
{time} 0940
We are talking about a food benefit that gives barely over $6 a day
to some of the poorest people in this country, many working multiple
jobs and still unable to make ends meet and many others who are
seniors, who are veterans, who are children, and Americans with
disabilities.
That is the meager benefit you guys cut to give tax breaks to rich
people. Give me a break.
Let's not forget the provision in this farm bill that helps chemical
companies dump toxic chemicals into our food system, poisoning
farmworkers and polluting our air and water. Who the hell asked for
that? Was it drafted in the Monsanto boardroom?
Thankfully, a popular bipartisan amendment was made in order by the
Committee on Agriculture to fix the provision. While I am glad that we
will be able to take a vote on it and see where Members lie on this
issue--my hope is that it passes--it still doesn't fix the rest of this
awful, terrible bill.
Costs are up. Corruption is up. Chaos is up, and you guys are
screwing over poor people. This is beyond outrageous. It is immoral. It
is sick. It is wrong.
After huddling in back rooms and arguing among themselves,
Republicans are now sending to the floor a year-round E15 bill--get
this, Mr. Speaker--that adds billions of dollars to the deficit. They
are doing it in a very clever way. Once the E15 bill passes, it gets
combined with the farm bill before it gets sent to the Senate.
Where are my Freedom Caucus friends? Do you even know that this
provision is in the bill? Do you even know what is going on here? I
mean, billions and billions of dollars are being added to the deficit.
I thought you cared about the deficit, but apparently you don't. It is
a reason to vote against this rule. If you don't know about it, then
the leadership of this House pulled a fast one on you.
Since the day Trump took office last year, the national debt has gone
up $2.8 trillion. Full Republican control--full Republican control has
added nearly $3 trillion to the debt, and now we are
[[Page H3140]]
adding billions more with another Republican backroom deal.
I mean, during our Agriculture Committee markup, Chairman Thompson
said over and over and over again that we had an obligation to remain
budget neutral. He said that that is why we couldn't do anything to
address the horrible nutrition cuts, why we couldn't do anything to
provide any more support for our farmers, and why we couldn't modernize
our conservation programs.
We can't do any of those things, but if it is for war or if it is for
tax cuts for the rich or for this E15 bill, Republicans are more than
happy to add to the debt.
Gut it. Gut it.
Mr. Speaker, people are struggling. They are working hard, and they
are falling behind. If Republicans spent half as much time lowering
costs as they spend passing nonbinding resolutions congratulating
themselves, maybe we could actually get something done around here, but
they can't help themselves.
The billionaires say, jump, and the Speaker asks: How high?
Monsanto says: Bail us out. Republicans ask: How much?
Big Tech, Big Ag, and Big Oil, they all run wild. It is pathetic, Mr.
Speaker--pathetic.
The American people were promised lower costs. They were promised a
Congress that would fight for them. They were lied to. Instead, they
got extremism. They got a majority that wakes up every morning and asks
how to make life easier for the rich and powerful. They got an
administration and a Congress that covers up for Epstein-elite
pedophiles instead of fighting for everyday people. Enough already.
This is an awful rule. It blocks 7 of 10 Republican amendments. It
blocks 7 of 10 Republican amendments, 8 out of 10 bipartisan
amendments, and 9 out of 10 Democratic amendments. No Member of this
House has had an amendment debated on the floor in nearly 100 days. Now
that we do, here is what we get.
In case it was not clear yet, Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to
vote ``no'' on this rule, and I reserve the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded to direct their
comments to the Chair.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as
I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I am glad that the gentleman brought up corruption.
Certainly, we have seen what is going on in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and
many of the other Democratic-run cities and States.
He brought up gas prices, as well. I am thankful that Donald Trump
has believed in energy independence, and gas prices are lower than they
were under the Biden administration, even when we weren't at war,
simply because of the stupid rules and regulations passed by that
administration.
Mr. Speaker, I now yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from North
Carolina (Ms. Foxx), my friend and chairwoman of the Rules Committee.
Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding and doing
such a great job in handling this rule and being on the Rules
Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I also thank the staff of the Rules Committee for their
great work under very difficult circumstances almost every day, but
especially this week.
Mr. Speaker, I am going to share with you and with all of our
Republican colleagues an observation about the behavior of Democrats in
the Rules Committee yesterday evening. Please listen carefully.
Rules Committee Democrats put on a real master class in how to sell
fake altruism. Really, it was quite the spectacle, maybe even worthy of
an Academy Award. What a performance it was.
Mr. Speaker, our Democratic colleagues offered a handful of
amendments authored by Republicans and proclaimed that they were
standing up for these Republicans and their ideas. They could have
fooled me.
What the Democrats were doing was weaponizing the ideas of our
Republican colleagues for their own gain. Their goal the entire time
was never altruistic. It was never about supporting Republican
amendments or even fighting for them.
Their goal was to waste our time. Democrats treat time like they
treat the tax dollars of Americans: with disregard and utter contempt.
Their words and actions are always steeped in a vat of hypocrisy. Look
at today, and they know it, too.
To those Members of our Conference who the Democrats used so
callously last night and who are thinking about opposing the rule on
the floor today, I simply say this: You are far better than falling for
the fake altruism of those across the aisle who never supported you or
the solutions you bring to the table--not once.
Mr. Speaker, I support the rule and its five underlying measures, and
I encourage all of my colleagues to do the same.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, first, let me say to my colleague from Georgia: Keep
bragging about gas prices and see how that works for you in November.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the Record an
article titled: ``U.S. Gas Prices Hit Highest Level Since Beginning of
War in Iran.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.
[From the New York Times, Apr. 28, 2026]
U.S. Gas Prices Hit Highest Level Since Beginning of War in Iran
(By Emmett Lindner)
Gasoline prices in the United States rose on Tuesday to
their highest level in four years as peace talks between the
United States and Iran appeared at an impasse.
The average cost for a gallon of regular gasoline is $4.18,
according to the AAA motor club. The price at the pump has
not been that high since April 2022, shortly after Russia
invaded Ukraine. Tuesday's jump of 1.6 percent was the
highest percentage increase in more than a month.
Oil prices continued to climb on Tuesday, with negotiators
deadlocked over proposals to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to
tanker traffic and restrict Iran's nuclear program.
The price of crude oil has risen steadily over the past
week, as talks have stalled during an uneasy cease-fire.
Brent crude, the international benchmark, has posted gains in
six of the past seven trading sessions and remains more than
40 percent higher than it was before the first U.S.-Israeli
strikes on Iran in late February.
Stock markets are trading near record highs, however, as
corporate earnings have been largely resilient. A batch of
financial reports expected this week from the largest
technology companies, which are spending hundreds of billions
of dollars on artificial intelligence systems, will be
closely watched.
Oil continues to rise.
The price of Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil,
jumped 4 percent, to above $105 a barrel for July delivery,
but slipped to $104 a barrel after the United Arab Emirates
said it would leave the OPEC oil cartel next month. Brent's
price has risen about $10 per barrel over the past week. The
price for oil deliverable in June rose above $110 per barrel
for the first time this month.
West Texas Intermediate crude, the U.S. benchmark, rose 5
percent, to around $101 a barrel, for June delivery.
Investors and analysts are focused on the continued
disruption to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow
waterway between Iran and Oman that is a vital trading route
for oil and natural gas that normally carries as much as one-
fifth of the world's oil supply.
Stocks dip ahead of Fed meeting and tech earnings.
The S&P 500 fell 0.6 percent on Tuesday after nudging
higher on Monday. Investors await a number of tech company
earnings and the Federal Reserve's decision on interest rates
this week, which could move markets.
Stocks in Asia, where countries import vast quantities of
oil and gas, were mixed. The Kospi index in Korea gained 0.4
percent, but Taiwan's Sensex index slipped 0.4 percent. The
Nikkei 225 in Japan slid 1 percent after the Bank of Japan
held interest rates steady, as expected, but some board
members argued for a rate increase to deal with inflation
risks spurred by the war in Iran.
In Europe, the Stoxx 600, a broad index that tracks the
region's largest companies, fell 0.5 percent.
Gasoline prices tick higher.
U.S. gasoline prices rose on Tuesday, jumping to a national
average of $4.18 a gallon, according to the AAA motor club.
The increase has raised the cost for drivers 40 percent since
the war began.
Gas prices don't move in lock step with crude, usually
trailing increases or drops.
Diesel prices have increased even more quickly and stood at
$5.46 on Tuesday, up 45 percent since the start of the war.
What they are saying: `Exceptional' conditions for big oil
companies.
BP, the British oil giant, reported its latest earnings on
Tuesday, comfortably surpassing analysts' expectations by
doubling its profit in the first quarter, to more than $3
billion. ``The oil trading contribution was exceptional,''
the company said in a filing.
[[Page H3141]]
Meg O'Neill, who recently took over as chief executive of
BP, said in a statement that she joined the group ``at a time
when our industry is operating in an environment of conflict
and complexity, playing a vital role in keeping energy
flowing.''
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I will say to my friend, the distinguished
chairwoman of the Rules Committee: We offered amendments because we
haven't had a vote on an amendment in nearly 100 days. No Democrat and
no Republican has been able to vote on an amendment in nearly 100 days.
Mr. Van Orden, who is sitting there, had two amendments that were
blocked. Mr. Neguse offered one of them last night, and every
Republican voted against it.
Some of the amendments that we offered, quite frankly, I support. The
Biggs amendment on FISA, I support. That was really an interesting
display of theater because we had the votes, but one of the
Republicans, Mr. Griffith, every time we brought it up, conveniently
got up and walked out of the room so he didn't have to cast a vote. We
called it up several times, and he kept on walking out of the room. If
you want to talk about theater, that really does deserve an Academy
Award.
There were a lot of other amendments, quite frankly, that we brought
up that I support. By the way, we brought up amendments that I don't
support, but just because I don't support them doesn't mean they don't
deserve to be debated on the House floor.
That is one of the problems with the Republican leadership right now
in Congress. You don't believe that this place is a deliberative body.
You believe it is kind of your way or the highway, and it is not just
Democrats who are getting locked out.
What is the percentage of Republicans? Republican amendments were
blocked 70 percent of the time. Most of them were germane. Some of them
weren't even particularly controversial in any way, shape, or form.
They were blocked.
Bipartisan amendments were blocked 80 percent of the time. I know you
don't care about Democrats, but 90 percent of our amendments were
blocked. I mean, 70 percent of your own party were denied amendments in
the Rules Committee. Again, it has been nearly 100 days since we have
had a debate on any amendment, Republican or Democratic amendment.
Again, if that is how you all want this place to be run, have at it,
but I would urge my Republican colleagues to take a stand now. Say
``no'' to this. Say ``no'' to this, and I guarantee you that it will
change. Yet, going along to get along has resulted in even Republican
Members being denied the right to offer their amendments.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms.
Craig), the distinguished ranking member of the Committee on
Agriculture who has done an incredible job standing up for our farmers
and for the most needy in this country.
{time} 0950
Ms. CRAIG. Mr. Speaker, my Republican colleague mentioned
Minneapolis. Let's talk about Minneapolis since this is a rules debate.
Mr. Speaker, in this rule is additional funding for ICE and CBP.
Let's talk about Minneapolis. Let's talk about the fact that two U.S.
citizens were murdered on the streets of Minneapolis.
There is no way in hell Democrats are going to give one more penny to
ICE and CBP until reforms are in place. So if you want to bring up
Minneapolis, we can bring up Minneapolis, but you better bring it up
with the full context of what the Trump administration is doing in our
country that we will not stand for.
Mr. Speaker, related to the farm bill, the Rules Committee had the
opportunity to improve this legislation which falls way short of the 5-
year, 12-title farm bill that we should be here discussing today.
We should have addressed the tariffs that are bankrupting America's
family farmers. Farm bankruptcies are up 50 percent across this country
over the last year in the Trump administration. Farm bankruptcies are
up 70 percent in the Midwest.
Trump's trade wars are destroying American farmers. They are sending
China to Brazil and Argentina for that business. When we think about
what the Trump administration is doing--the Iran war has increased
fertilizer costs. It has increased diesel prices. This is not putting
America's farmers first. Anytime this President tells you that he loves
you, ask him what his actions are doing to help you.
We should have included additional farm aid. The Farm Bureau says
farmers have lost $54 billion over the last year--$54 billion over the
last year. Believe it or not, this administration said they are giving
our family farmers $12 billion. That is how much we are going to give
our family farmers.
We should have bolstered SNAP. At the end of the day, it is
unconscionable to me that we used reconciliation to plus-up crop
insurance programs--Democrats would have supported that in a farm
bill--and then cut SNAP by $187 billion. Don't say we didn't cut SNAP.
That is absolute nonsense. What you did is you shifted the cost to
States in our country, an unfunded mandate that is already increasing
taxes in a State like Minnesota. Our counties are having to raise
property taxes for constituents to pay for it, and, by the way, a lot
of these constituents are Republican constituents.
We should have rallied around a bill that helped family farmers and
working families in this country. Instead, this rule opens the door for
a bill that rubberstamps tariffs. It does nothing to lower costs on
farm inputs.
It opens the door for a bill that does not provide a single penny in
additional farm aid. It locks in the $187 billion cut to SNAP that has
already deprived 3.4 million Americans of food assistance.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the
gentlewoman from Minnesota.
Ms. CRAIG. Green-lighting this rule and the underlying bill is
sending a message to every American that Congress does not have their
back. It sends a signal to farm country that they are on their own.
This bill needs a do-over. My hope is the Senate will provide that
do-over. It is not worthy of our support, and I urge my colleagues on
both sides of the aisle to vote ``no'' on this rule.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded to direct their remarks
to the Chair.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, before we go any further, I
would just like to remind the American citizens that under the Biden
administration, over 82 percent of farm bill spending was going to
SNAP, and they virtually eliminated any of the support for the American
farm families.
Again, Democrats demanded that over 80 percent of farm bill spending
go to SNAP benefits. That is one of the reasons that the American farm
family is suffering so hard today.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr.
Crawford), my friend and the chairman of the House Intelligence
Committee.
Mr. CRAWFORD. Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend from Georgia for
yielding. I rise in support of House Resolution 1224, the rule to
consider S. 1318, the Foreign Intelligence Accountability Act. This
legislation makes further reforms to section 702 of the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, and reauthorizes the authority
for 3 years.
FISA section 702 is one of our country's most important foreign
intelligence authorities and is limited to collection on foreign
nationals based overseas who are likely to provide foreign intelligence
value.
These are terrorists, hackers, and spies living abroad. No U.S.
citizen anywhere in the world can be a target under section 702.
While no U.S. person can be a target of FISA 702, some U.S. person
information may incidentally be collected if a foreign target is
talking to or about a U.S. person or entity.
In 2024, in response to significant FBI abuses of both section 702
and traditional FISA, Congress passed the Reforming Intelligence and
Securing America Act, or RISAA, which imposed 56 new requirements and
safeguards. Most of the reform measures were directly in response to
past abuses by the FBI.
Reauthorizing FISA 702 is essential, but the reality is that despite
the successful limits and reforms implemented through RISAA, there is
still major distrust of the FBI.
[[Page H3142]]
Over the past weeks, alongside Speaker Johnson and Judiciary
Committee Chairman Jordan, we have met with members across the
Republican Conference to identify core requirements and go line by line
through the legislation to make changes and address concerns with the
goal of reauthorizing section 702 and requiring additional layers of
accountability.
The reality is that no reauthorization effort will likely address
everyone's concerns, but this bill makes measurable reforms to
strengthen accountability and safeguards while maintaining the
criticality of the foreign intelligence tool.
Specifically, the new legislation adds the following six new
provisions: clarifies that no U.S. person can be a target of 702
collection, and any targeting of U.S. person requires a title I or
title III warrant; requires an outside review and authentication of FBI
U.S. person queries by the Civil Liberty Protection Officer at the
Office of the Director of National Intelligence; establishes criminal
penalties for intentional abuse of FISA 702 queries and falsification
of statements to the FISC; requires DOJ to update procedures to allow
Members to attend FISC hearings; requires FBI attorney preapproval of
all FBI U.S. person queries; and mandates an independent audit by the
Government Accountability Office on 702 targeting procedures.
With these important reforms, the bill includes the reauthorization
for FISA 702 authorities for 3 years.
In addition to section 702 reforms, the rule adds H.R. 1919, the
Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act to the underlying bill. This bill
blocks the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency
to individuals, thereby preventing the Fed from collecting personal
financial data on Americans.
The Anti-CBDC bill has passed the House two times already this
Congress, and I was proud to support it both times. I want to thank
Whip Emmer for introducing it and Financial Services Chairman French
Hill for moving it through committee and working with us to attach it
to the section 702 extension. When this bill is sent to the Senate, I
urge them to pass the combined measure, and I urge all Members to
support the rule and underlying bills.
Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
I want to say to the gentleman who just spoke, the chairman of the
Intelligence Committee, I have great respect for him, but that is a lot
of words basically to say that Democrats and Republicans will be denied
the right to be able to debate and vote on a warrant requirement.
Madam Speaker, I have already spoken about how terrible the bills in
this rule are, but let me just take a minute to talk about how much of
a dumpster fire the last 48 hours have been from a process standpoint.
The way this place is being run by your so-called leadership, Madam
Speaker, is beyond incompetent. It is pathetic.
We spent all night waiting around while Republicans fought amongst
themselves. We were told nearly at midnight on Monday to go home. We
were then told Rules would meet at 8 a.m. on Tuesday. We showed up for
that meeting only to be told there would be no meeting because
Republicans were still busy fighting with each other.
Madam Speaker, you guys had all weekend. Didn't you think to do a
Zoom call or something like that with your members to find out where
they were? On FISA, this thing has been going on for weeks. Didn't you
have a meeting or a phone call or a text thread or something to try to
work that out?
Finally, at long last, we convened and reported out a rule, but based
on public reporting, it is not clear whether the rule that we are
debating right now can pass.
So what the hell are we doing here? I mean, can somebody please,
please call the Republican whip and ask his office if they have the
votes? Maybe they can ask them if they know how to count. We keep
running around in circles here, Madam Speaker, and I will tell you why.
{time} 1000
You guys have a tiny, slim majority. Rather than trying to work
things out with Democrats, you cut us out of the process. The result is
endless chaos, endless incompetence, and endless delay, and everyday
Americans are the ones who pay the price.
Here is just one example. Democrats tried to make in order many
Republican amendments in the Rules Committee last night. One of them,
authored by Representative Biggs, would require a warrant before the
government spies on Americans. Last time the amendment came to the
floor, it tied. Clearly, this is an important issue with members of
both parties on both sides. It is exactly the kind of debate Congress
should be having out in the open.
What did Republicans do? Well, there were two Republicans who voted
with us to bring the amendment to the floor--again, an amendment to
make sure the government can't spy on Americans without warrants. That
was what the amendment was. Then, a third Republican, as I mentioned
before, kept getting up and leaving the room every time we called the
vote. It was really comical.
That is why we won't be having a floor debate, again, on a Republican
amendment. That was a Republican amendment we tried to bring to the
floor, and it was blocked by a Republican who literally had to get up
and leave the room because if he didn't, it would pass. I just wonder
who asked him to leave. What an embarrassment to this institution.
For the record, it isn't just one amendment Republicans have blocked
here. It is hundreds. Seven out of 10 Republican amendments are
blocked. Eight out of 10 bipartisan amendments are blocked. Nine out of
10 Democratic amendments are blocked. Let me repeat that: Nine out of
10 Democratic amendments are blocked in this rule.
Over 50 times in the Rules Committee last night, we asked to simply
have an up-or-down vote on these important issues on the floor. Over 50
times, we were blocked.
I understand my ideas won't always prevail and win, but to not even
be able to get a vote--I mean, what the hell are Republicans afraid of?
Isn't it our job to debate and to vote?
This is an interesting statistic. For the record, we had more
amendment votes in the Rules Committee last night than we have had on
the House floor this entire year. That is not okay. We call ourselves
one of the greatest deliberative bodies of the world, and we aren't
deliberating on anything, for God's sake.
Republican leaders are blocking nearly every amendment, and that is
what this rule does. It blocks idea after idea after idea from being
debated and voted on.
We can't debate more aid for farmers. We can't debate more help for
hungry families. We have Republican Members who are publicly
threatening to take down this rule because their amendments were
blocked, too. I disagree strongly with some of their ideas, and I would
vote ``no,'' but they deserve a vote, don't they?
These bills are take it or leave it. The leadership dictates every
single letter, every comma. This is no way to run this place. It is no
way to run a banana stand. It is pathetic. It is a disgrace. The
Speaker and the majority ought to be embarrassed by what is going on
here. You are screwing over your own Members.
Madam Speaker, you write bad bills, and you block good ideas. You
refuse to work with Democrats in a bipartisan way. You bend over
backward to appease the people in your Conference who have no interest
in governing.
Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr.
Neguse), a member of the Rules Committee who was there during the
entire fiasco in the Rules Committee yesterday, to further expand on
what I have been talking about.
Mr. NEGUSE. Madam Speaker, first, let me say thank you to the
distinguished ranking member of the Rules Committee for his principled
leadership.
I think it is well understood by most Americans that Congress is
broken and that Congress is deeply dysfunctional. For anyone who is
looking for another data point, we have one this morning: the
Republican Rules Committee chairwoman criticizing and attacking
Democratic members of the Rules Committee for trying to get a vote on
Republican amendments.
[[Page H3143]]
Think about that. The amendments that we offered last night, that I
offered last night, were not mine. They were amendments from members of
the Republican Conference. For having the audacity to suggest that
Republican ideas and Democratic ideas ought to be considered on the
floor of the House, in this august Chamber, we have the Republican
chairwoman attacking even the concept that a Democratic Member of
Congress could dare introduce a Republican amendment.
For Ms. Boebert, for Mr. Van Orden, for Mrs. Miller-Meeks, for Mr.
Steube--go down the line--vote after vote after vote, two-thirds of
Republican amendments were rejected by the Republican Rules Committee.
Why? What are we afraid of?
This ought to be the Chamber where we can have a reasoned, objective
debate and let the chips fall where they may.
I think it is deeply offensive to those Republican Members, to the
Members in my conference, and, fundamentally, to the American people to
suggest to them that we aren't capable of having that debate.
Just to be clear, on the substance, I have heard a lot of bluster
today. It is shocking to me to hear my colleagues lecture us about
fiscal responsibility as they preside over the highest debt in the
history of the Republic, to hear them pontificate about fighting for
working families as they enact the largest cut to SNAP, to food
assistance for hungry families, in the history of the country.
Madam Speaker, they sermonize about fraud and corruption while the
Trump administration engages in wholesale corruption daily, and they do
nothing about it.
President Trump, right now, is suing the IRS for a $10 billion
shakedown. Think about it. He is suing the Federal Government that he
controls for a check for $10 billion that he hopes to secure that will
go to Donald Trump, signed by Donald Trump. Who is paying the check?
The American taxpayers. If you want to root out corruption, let's start
there.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Kim). The time of the gentleman has
expired.
Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, I yield an additional 1 minute to the
gentleman from Colorado.
Mr. NEGUSE. Madam Speaker, it is absurd. It is unconscionable. It is
outrageous.
I just say to the gentleman from Georgia, whom I respect, I
understand his arguments on the merits of some of these bills, but
spare us the pious lectures, please, especially about corruption, not
while President Trump is suing the Justice Department, suing the IRS,
and trying to secure more money from hardworking taxpayers in our
country, please.
For my Republican colleagues who are debating whether to vote on this
procedural rule, just remember that when you had an important issue
that you wanted debated on the House floor, your Conference rejected
that debate. If you are interested in pesticide immunity or the
regulation of field trip forms for middle schoolers, yes, they have you
covered. This rule encompasses all of that. If you have a particular
issue that is important to your constituents here, to your district,
you are out of luck.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Van Orden).
Mr. VAN ORDEN. Madam Speaker, I will take a second to thank my
Democratic colleagues for acknowledging my amendments. I will be
sending them my entire list of legislative priorities for their
cosponsorship.
I stand here today to strongly support the E15 year-round
codification. For the past 5 years, the EPA has been using data that is
older than some of the Members of this body. For 5 years in a row, the
EPA has issued an emergency waiver for the use of E15 year-round
because of the data sources that they have been using.
Under the leadership of President Trump and Lee Zeldin, we are now
going to use data from this century. It is critically important.
This is what that data has shown. E15 is environmentally sound. It is
readily available. It is reliable. Most importantly, it is affordable.
Madam Speaker, I strongly urge my colleagues on both sides of the
aisle to vote for this rule and for the underlying legislation.
Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
I would remind the gentleman from Wisconsin that he is in the
majority party and that 100 percent of his amendments were blocked. I
don't know what he did to tick off Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, but he
voted against his amendments in the Rules Committee last night.
By the way, I am somebody who believes that we ought to debate
amendments, even the ones that I don't always agree with, because I
think this is a place where diversity of opinion and ideas ought to be
brought to the floor and ought to be debated.
I am sorry the gentleman doesn't share that passion. I will tell you
this: If you vote for this rule, as you just said you would, you can
look forward to your future amendments being blocked by the majority in
your own party, because that is what they have been doing.
{time} 1010
We haven't had a debate on a single amendment on this floor in nearly
100 days. I am not okay with that, and I hope my Republican colleagues
are not okay with that, either.
They ought to send a message to your leadership that this bs has to
stop now. Individual Members have to be respected, and their ideas need
to be brought to the floor.
I will say one final thing on the E15 matter. I think it is a
legitimate issue. Our problem with it is that we are told that we can't
address the issue of hunger and food insecurity because it adds to the
deficit and the debt.
The Republican leadership in here knows that the Office of Management
and Budget has said that the E15 provision will cost billions--billions
with a b. Rather than offset it, they came up with a clever way to vote
on it separately and then merge it with the farm bill at the end and
send it to the Senate.
Again, none of this is paid for. What happened to fiscal
responsibility? I guess when it comes to helping poor people, everybody
on that side is: Oh, we can't do it because we have to be fiscally
responsible. On other things, the sky is the limit.
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Oregon (Ms.
Dexter).
Ms. DEXTER. Madam Speaker, I thank the distinguished ranking member
for yielding.
Madam Speaker, at a time when too many Americans are struggling to
afford groceries, Congress should be working together to help feed
working families.
We could be expanding access to food and vegetables, and investing in
Food Is Medicine programs that keep people healthy and out of the
hospital.
Instead, we are considering a betrayal of a farm bill that cuts food
assistance for millions and fails our farmers. Let me be clear: Hunger
is a health issue. Hunger is a policy choice.
I spent 20 years caring for the sickest patients in my community, and
I know how food insecurity results in illness. I saw patients who
delayed care to be able to put food on the table, only to end up in the
hospital even sicker. I cared for people who couldn't afford the
healthy food to manage their hypertension, diabetes, or heart disease.
This bill makes impossible choices harder. We need a farm bill that
helps farmers feed Americans and helps families afford that food. This
bill does neither.
Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on the rule and,
instead, work to advance solutions that actually help families.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time
as I may consume.
Madam Speaker, starving farmers the way Democrats did over the last
several years, where they took and put 82 percent of farm bill spending
into SNAP benefits, doesn't allow farmers the resources they need to
grow the food that hungry people need.
We exempted anyone under 18 from the changes that we made. Anybody
over 65 was exempted from the changes that we made. Anybody who is
medically or psychologically disabled or unable to work is exempt from
the
[[Page H3144]]
changes we made. Anybody who puts in the effort to work 20 hours a week
is exempt from the changes we made.
Madam Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Kansas
(Mr. Mann), my friend who has done tremendous work on the farm bill and
E15.
Mr. MANN. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman, my friend from
Georgia, for all of his efforts to get this passed.
Madam Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the Farm, Food, and
National Security Act of 2026 and urge my colleagues to pass this
critical legislation and the rule to bring it to the floor.
The last full farm bill was passed in 2018. Since then, input costs
have risen, borrowing has become more expensive, and markets have grown
more volatile. Our policies must reflect that reality.
Last year, we took an important step forward by strengthening the
farm safety net and delivering meaningful support for producers through
the Working Families Tax Cut Act.
This bill now builds on that foundation. It delivers a modern,
fiscally responsible, 5-year farm bill that meets the needs of today's
producers and prepares American agriculture for the future.
This bill is grounded in fiscal responsibility. It provides certainty
without growing government for the sake of growing government. It cuts
through unnecessary red tape and focuses on what actually works for
producers on the ground.
Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the Farm, Food, and
National Security Act of 2026.
I also rise in strong support of year-round E15 and, specifically,
the Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act, which finally
makes it a reality.
In the Big First District of Kansas, agriculture is the backbone of
our economy and our way of life. Our farmers work hard every day to
produce the feedstocks that power American ethanol. Expanding access to
E15 means stronger markets and better prices for consumers and more
certainty.
Madam Speaker, this is a win for farmers, a win for consumers, and a
win for American energy. I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' for H.R.
1346 and support year-round E15.
Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Madam Speaker, I am sorry that my colleague from Georgia does not
believe that we can help both farmers and hungry families, but I do.
That is what I am fighting for.
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from California
(Ms. Kamlager-Dove).
Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE. Madam Speaker, today, I rise in strong opposition
to this rule and all the things. These bills are problematic and
dangerous and will not make gas prices lower or feed families.
The FISA bill will allow the government to oversurveil Americans. The
farm bill will keep the cuts to SNAP benefits and food pantries while
protecting large corporations that put pesticides in your food.
The budget bill will fund the murderous ICE and Border Patrol to the
tune of $140 billion without accountability.
The anti-trans bill will continue to demonize the trans community.
These bills are not just dangerous. They could kill people.
Madam Speaker, to load all of these sinister bills together and try
to stuff them down the throats of Americans already choking on the
incompetence of the majority is disingenuous and delusional.
No on the rule. No on the floor. Just no. Enough is enough.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Baird).
Mr. BAIRD. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of the Farm, Food,
and National Security Act of 2026.
In my district, agriculture isn't just a part of the economy; it is
the economy. Our corn and soybean farmers feed our country, fuel our
bioeconomy, and supply global markets, all while operating on tight
margins and managing significant risks.
This bill provides the certainty they need to plan, invest, and
sustain operations that often span generations.
It also strengthens the critical link between research and
production. Institutions like Purdue University are driving advances in
crop science, soil health, precision agriculture, and supply chain
resilience, moving the innovation from the lab to the field and keeping
American agriculture globally competitive.
I am especially pleased this legislation includes provisions I have
worked on to expand access to the technical expertise for conservation,
strengthen local and regional processing capacity, improve coordination
between the leading research agencies, and provide clarity for emerging
agricultural technologies.
These are the practical steps that help farmers adopt innovation and
build more resilient supply chains.
Just as important, this bill reaffirms our strong commitment to
science-based standards, particularly at the Environmental Protection
Agency. The EPA's rigorous and data-driven review process ensures
farmers have access to safe and effective crop protection tools while
protecting consumers and the environment. We must maintain that gold
standard while also ensuring that reviews are timely and predictable,
so American producers remain competitive.
Madam Speaker, this bill strengthens farm programs, invests in
conservation, and supports our rural communities. It is about
stability, innovation, and national security.
Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues on both sides to support this
legislation.
Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Madam Speaker, if we defeat the previous question, I will offer an
amendment to the rule to adopt the Senate amendment to H.R. 7147, the
bipartisan compromise bill that the Senate unanimously passed twice now
to fund all the law-abiding agencies under the Department of Homeland
Security.
Enough is enough. This is the deal to fund the Department of Homeland
Security while we discuss changes in ICE and CBP. It is a bipartisan
measure. It passed unanimously in the Senate twice.
The situation is so dire now that even the White House has sent a
letter urging the House to pass the bill.
I am, once again, giving all Members of this body a chance to do the
right thing and to provide a vote on this bipartisan DHS bill. Stop the
games. Stop the games.
Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to insert the text of my
amendment into the Record along with any extraneous material
immediately prior to the vote on the previous question.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.
Mr. McGOVERN. I urge all Members to reject this madness and the games
my friends are playing on the other side of the aisle and vote ``no''
on the previous question so we can fund, finally, DHS.
Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
{time} 1020
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Speaker, I am not aware of any
recorded vote on the floor of the United States Senate. I am aware of a
couple of actions being taken when nobody was on the floor of the
United States Senate, but I am not aware of any recorded vote.
Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Iowa (Mr.
Nunn), who has done tremendous work on the farm bill and the E15 issue.
Mr. NUNN of Iowa. Madam Speaker, I thank Austin Scott for his
leadership on this farm bill.
I am from Iowa. We are home to 87,000 proud farmers. We are the home
of American Gothic, and we are home to some of the best technology,
particularly in ag, this country has ever seen and the world can
benefit from. That is why it is so important that we move forward a
farm bill this year that helps not just farmers but everyone in this
country and leads with energy and biofuels the world over.
I am speaking specifically to year-round nationwide E15. Not only is
it 30 cents cheaper at the pump, not only is it 50 percent more fuel
efficient and
[[Page H3145]]
cleaner for us, and not only does it bleed off our need right now for
foreign energy sources, it starts right here in America.
Here is the reality: For the last 4 years under the Biden
administration gas hit its highest price of over $5 a gallon. We have
the opportunity to rein it in with this. The reality is we have done
more in the last 4 months than the last administration had done in the
last 4 years. We have moved forward on summer waivers with EPA
Administrator Lee Zeldin. We have worked for 45Z, and we have helped
sustainable aviation fuel.
Iowa's producers should not have to win it back every single year. We
should make this permanent, year-round, and nationwide, and help not
only farmers grow, but my consumers, like my six kids, have a more
affordable cost of living right here in Iowa and right here in America.
The 21 counties across Iowa that I pass through have all asked for
certainty. This bill delivers it.
Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this in a bipartisan
fashion, Republicans and Democrats, so that we can have energy
independence right here in America with E15 year-round nationwide.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Speaker, I, again, want to give
great credit to Mr. Nunn and the Iowa delegation as well as many others
for their work on the E15 issue and the farm bill.
Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, I just wish the E15 measure was paid for
and wasn't going to explode the deficit.
Madam Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from New
Mexico (Ms. Stansbury).
Ms. STANSBURY. Madam Speaker, I am appalled by what is coming before
us on the floor today all wrapped up in one big, ugly rule. There are
billions for ICE's warrantless searches on Americans and for funds that
cut millions of Americans' children's access to food.
While working Americans are struggling to put food on the table and a
roof over their head, farmers are wondering how they are going to
weather drought, tariffs, and soaring fuel and fertilizer prices, what
are Republicans bringing to the floor in this House?
They are handing ICE another blank check. They are forcing a farm
bill that fails our farmers and ranchers and gives big corporations
handouts, and on top of that, another FISA bill that gives a backdoor
to spy on Americans.
This is not governing. It is a dereliction of duty.
Madam Speaker, stop gaslighting the American people. Our farmers need
relief, our families need help, and the hardworking people of this
country need you to show up for them and to stand up for the American
people. We have had enough of this chaos, enough of this cruelty, and
enough of this corruption. We must vote ``no''.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Speaker, I will just remind the
gentlewoman that New Mexico has experienced a historic financial boom
driven by what President Trump has done in unleashing America's
domestic energy production. I think it was the Senate later that said
they had more money than they could figure out how to spend in New
Mexico.
Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, I don't have any more speakers, and I am
prepared to close.
Madam Speaker, may I ask how much time I have remaining.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Massachusetts has 30
seconds remaining.
Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, prices are up, debate in this House is down. We are
debating culture war nonsense instead of adhering to an affordability
agenda. We are giving more money to ICE and CBP that are lawless and
that don't need any more money. We are giving more tax breaks to
millionaires and billionaires. Farmers are getting screwed over, poor
people are getting screwed over, hunger is going up in this country,
and enough is enough. Enough is enough.
My friends on the other side do not care.
I will say to my Republican colleagues: If you are tired of getting
rolled by your own leadership, then vote ``no'' on this rule. Vote
``no'' on this rule.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman's time is expired.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Speaker, Customs and Border
Protection is an extremely important part of protecting the United
States of America. While the Democrats might want to eliminate Customs
and Border Protection so that they can make the borders wide open, the
American citizens want those borders secure.
This week, the House has the ability to advance five pieces of
legislation, including the Farm, Food, and National Security Act,
representing years of committee efforts and stakeholder engagement,
strengthening rural America, improving conservation tools, and
supporting American producers.
The Foreign Intelligence Accountability Act reauthorizes section 702,
with reforms, providing the continued ability to collect intelligence
on foreign nationals overseas, who are reasonably believed to possess
foreign intelligence information, in order to stop terrorist attacks on
United States soil--again, stopping terrorist attacks on United States
soil.
We have no idea who the Democrats let into this country over the last
several years.
The Stopping Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act supports parents,
strengthens transparency, and protects our children in educational
environments.
The budget resolution is an essential first step toward ending this
Democrat-driven shutdown at DHS and strengthening our Nation's national
security and keeping our borders secure, which is what Democrats' real
opposition is to the Department of Homeland Security.
Finally, the Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act allows
the option to sell gasoline that is blended with 10 percent to 15
percent ethanol year-round and provides additional reforms to the
Renewable Energy Standard.
Together these measures advance our commitments to American families,
American procedures, and responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars.
Madam Speaker, in order to keep America's border secure, I urge my
colleagues to join me in voting ``yes'' on the previous question and
``yes'' on the rule.
The material previously referred to by Mr. McGovern is as follows:
An Amendment to H. Res. 1224 Offered By Mr. McGovern of Massachusetts
At the end of the resolution, add the following:
Sec. 12. Immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the
House shall take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R.
7147) making further consolidated appropriations for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other
purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and consider in
the House, without intervention of any point of order, a
motion that the House recede from its amendment and concur in
the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment and the motion
shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable
for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations or
their respective designees. The previous question shall be
considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without
intervening motion.
Sec. 13. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX and clause 8 of rule XX
shall not apply to the consideration of the motion.
Sec. 14. The Speaker is directed to sign the enrolled bill
no later than one calendar day after adoption, and the Clerk
is directed to present the bill to the President immediately
upon signature by the Senate President.
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance
of my time, and I move the previous question on the resolution.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on ordering the previous
question.
The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.
Mr. McGOVERN. Madam Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, the Chair
will reduce to 5 minutes the minimum time for any electronic vote on
the question of adoption of the resolution, if ordered.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 215,
nays 210, not voting 5, as follows:
[[Page H3146]]
[Roll No. 140]
YEAS--215
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei (NV)
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Barr
Barrett
Baumgartner
Bean (FL)
Begich
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Biggs (AZ)
Biggs (SC)
Bilirakis
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Bresnahan
Buchanan
Burchett
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Carey
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Crane
Crank
Crawford
Crenshaw
Davidson
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donalds
Downing
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Evans (CO)
Ezell
Fallon
Fedorchak
Feenstra
Fine
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Fong
Foxx
Franklin, Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Fuller
Garbarino
Gill (TX)
Gimenez
Goldman (TX)
Gooden
Gosar
Graves
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Hamadeh (AZ)
Haridopolos
Harrigan
Harris (MD)
Harris (NC)
Harshbarger
Hern (OK)
Higgins (LA)
Hill (AR)
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Hurd (CO)
Issa
Jack
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (OH)
Joyce (PA)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kennedy (UT)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley (CA)
Kim
Knott
Kustoff
LaHood
LaLota
Langworthy
Latta
Lawler
Lee (FL)
Letlow
Lucas
Luna
Luttrell
Mace
Mackenzie
Malliotakis
Maloy
Mann
Massie
Mast
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
McDowell
McGuire
Messmer
Meuser
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Moolenaar
Moore (AL)
Moore (NC)
Moore (UT)
Moore (WV)
Moran
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Onder
Owens
Palmer
Patronis
Perry
Pfluger
Reschenthaler
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rouzer
Rulli
Rutherford
Salazar
Scalise
Schmidt
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Shreve
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Spartz
Stauber
Stefanik
Steil
Steube
Strong
Stutzman
Taylor
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner (OH)
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Epps
Van Orden
Wagner
Walberg
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Westerman
Wied
Williams (TX)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NAYS--210
Adams
Aguilar
Amo
Ansari
Auchincloss
Balint
Barragan
Beatty
Bell
Bera
Beyer
Bishop
Bonamici
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Budzinski
Bynum
Carbajal
Carson
Carter (LA)
Casar
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chu
Cisneros
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Conaway
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crow
Cuellar
Davids (KS)
Davis (IL)
Davis (NC)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dexter
Dingell
Doggett
Elfreth
Escobar
Espaillat
Evans (PA)
Fields
Figures
Fletcher
Foster
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Friedman
Frost
Garamendi
Garcia (CA)
Garcia (IL)
Garcia (TX)
Gillen
Golden (ME)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzalez, V.
Goodlander
Gottheimer
Gray
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (TX)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy (NY)
Khanna
Krishnamoorthi
Landsman
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latimer
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Levin
Liccardo
Lieu
Lofgren
Lynch
Magaziner
Mannion
Matsui
McBath
McBride
McClain Delaney
McClellan
McCollum
McDonald Rivet
McGarvey
McGovern
McIver
Meeks
Mejia
Menefee
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Min
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Morrison
Moskowitz
Moulton
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Neal
Neguse
Norcross
Ocasio-Cortez
Olszewski
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pappas
Pelosi
Perez
Peters
Pettersen
Pingree
Pocan
Pou
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Randall
Raskin
Riley (NY)
Rivas
Ross
Ruiz
Ryan
Salinas
Sanchez
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Sewell
Sherman
Simon
Smith (WA)
Sorensen
Soto
Stansbury
Stanton
Stevens
Strickland
Subramanyam
Suozzi
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Tran
Underwood
Vargas
Vasquez
Veasey
Velazquez
Vindman
Walkinshaw
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Whitesides
Williams (GA)
NOT VOTING--5
Crockett
Kean
Loudermilk
Roy
Wilson (FL)
{time} 1111
Ms. GARCIA of Texas and Mr. GOTTHEIMER changed their vote from
``yea'' to ``nay.''
Mr. SCHWEIKERT changed his vote from ``nay'' to ``yea.''
So the previous question was ordered.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Moore of North Carolina). The question
is on the resolution.
The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.
Recorded Vote
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 216,
noes 210, not voting 4, as follows:
[Roll No. 141]
AYES--216
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei (NV)
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Barr
Barrett
Baumgartner
Bean (FL)
Begich
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Biggs (AZ)
Biggs (SC)
Bilirakis
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Bresnahan
Buchanan
Burchett
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Carey
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Crane
Crank
Crawford
Crenshaw
Davidson
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donalds
Downing
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Evans (CO)
Ezell
Fallon
Fedorchak
Feenstra
Fine
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Fong
Foxx
Franklin, Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Fuller
Garbarino
Gill (TX)
Gimenez
Goldman (TX)
Gooden
Gosar
Graves
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Hamadeh (AZ)
Haridopolos
Harrigan
Harris (MD)
Harris (NC)
Harshbarger
Hern (OK)
Higgins (LA)
Hill (AR)
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Hurd (CO)
Issa
Jack
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (OH)
Joyce (PA)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kennedy (UT)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley (CA)
Kim
Knott
Kustoff
LaHood
LaLota
Langworthy
Latta
Lawler
Lee (FL)
Letlow
Lucas
Luna
Luttrell
Mace
Mackenzie
Malliotakis
Maloy
Mann
Massie
Mast
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
McDowell
McGuire
Messmer
Meuser
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Moolenaar
Moore (AL)
Moore (NC)
Moore (UT)
Moore (WV)
Moran
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Onder
Owens
Palmer
Patronis
Perry
Pfluger
Reschenthaler
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rouzer
Roy
Rulli
Rutherford
Salazar
Scalise
Schmidt
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Shreve
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Spartz
Stauber
Stefanik
Steil
Steube
Strong
Stutzman
Taylor
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner (OH)
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Epps
Van Orden
Wagner
Walberg
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Westerman
Wied
Williams (TX)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NOES--210
Adams
Aguilar
Amo
Ansari
Auchincloss
Balint
Barragan
Beatty
Bell
Bera
Beyer
Bishop
Bonamici
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Budzinski
Bynum
Carbajal
Carson
Carter (LA)
Casar
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Chu
Cisneros
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Conaway
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crow
Cuellar
Davids (KS)
Davis (IL)
Davis (NC)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dexter
Dingell
Doggett
Elfreth
Escobar
Espaillat
Evans (PA)
Fields
Figures
Fletcher
Foster
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Friedman
Frost
Garamendi
Garcia (CA)
Garcia (IL)
Garcia (TX)
Gillen
Golden (ME)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzalez, V.
Goodlander
Gottheimer
Gray
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (TX)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy (NY)
Khanna
Krishnamoorthi
Landsman
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latimer
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Levin
[[Page H3147]]
Liccardo
Lieu
Lofgren
Lynch
Magaziner
Mannion
Matsui
McBath
McBride
McClain Delaney
McClellan
McCollum
McDonald Rivet
McGarvey
McGovern
McIver
Meeks
Mejia
Menefee
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Min
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Morrison
Moskowitz
Moulton
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Neal
Neguse
Norcross
Ocasio-Cortez
Olszewski
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pappas
Pelosi
Perez
Peters
Pettersen
Pingree
Pocan
Pou
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Randall
Raskin
Riley (NY)
Rivas
Ross
Ruiz
Ryan
Salinas
Sanchez
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Sewell
Sherman
Simon
Smith (WA)
Sorensen
Soto
Stansbury
Stanton
Stevens
Strickland
Subramanyam
Suozzi
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Tran
Underwood
Vargas
Vasquez
Veasey
Velazquez
Vindman
Walkinshaw
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Whitesides
Williams (GA)
NOT VOTING--4
Crockett
Kean
Loudermilk
Wilson (FL)
{time} 1324
Messrs. CRANE, NEHLS, and SELF changed their vote from ``no'' to
``aye.''
So the resolution was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________