[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 73 (Monday, April 27, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2045-S2046]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program
Mr. WELCH. Madam President, the Low Income Home Energy Assistance
Program, known as LIHEAP, is a lifesaving program with a long history
of bipartisan support from its very first days. LIHEAP was started in
the administration of Ronald Reagan, and the program helps people in
need heat their homes in the winter and cool their homes in the summer.
You know, it is a beautiful day here in DC, but across the country,
in many places, it is still very cold and still very hot. LIHEAP was
established, as I mentioned, in 1981, by President Ronald Reagan, and
it provides funding to States to help low-income households with their
energy costs. The program originally just covered heating, but in 1984,
it was expanded to cooling, as it should be, because people in the
Presiding Officer's State, people in Arizona, Nevada, and many other
States are threatened by extreme heat, just as those in cold-weather
States, like Vermont, are threatened by extreme cold.
This program has been reauthorized many times since its inception,
and I am so pleased that it has always been bipartisan, because the
folks we represent, whether it is in cold- or warm-weather States, know
that people need the security that they are not going to freeze to
death or that they are not going to die of heatstroke. And that
happens; that is real.
And the Americans that rely on LIHEAP to heat their homes in the
winter and cool their homes in the summer are very scared. They need
help, and their neighbors and friends need help and assurance that this
program will continue.
President Trump, in his budget, has proposed to zero out the budget
for LIHEAP--literally, to end what Ronald Reagan began.
And when we are talking about those who do get some help with their
heating bills, we are talking about folks who are barely able to pay
their bills at the end of the month and often can't. And, again, this
is in the Presiding Officer's State and in my State.
For a family of four, the eligibility limit is $61,000. For a single
mother and a child, it is $40,000. For a single person just trying to
get by, it is $29,000.
So Vermonters who are struggling to pay their bills themselves but
are thinking about neighbors across the country are concerned about
this. I had a constituent from Essex, VT, urging me to protect LIHEAP
because ``I know it gets awfully cold in North Dakota and . . .
Minnesota.''
People in all our States understand how their neighbors and, in many
cases, they themselves need this. This is not a luxury. It can be a
matter of life and death for hundreds of thousands of Americans, from
Montpelier to Fairbanks, AK.
You know, this year, Burlington, VT, had its coldest weather in 17
years, with more than 20 straight days of below freezing temperatures.
In Fairbanks, Alaskans endured more than 89 days below zero, many days
below 30 to 40 degrees below zero.
And LIHEAP also provides cooling assistance to families in warm
weather climates, like Phoenix, AZ, where more than 100 days a year saw
temperatures of 100 degrees.
You know, I have gone on some fuel deliveries with the fuel dealers
who have a program to provide assistance, and what I know is,
Vermonters, when they see that fuel truck show up, are terrified
because that is a big, big monthly bill. And without the assistance
that we have been providing to people around the country to help them
with this, they literally are facing freezing or heatstroke.
That is also at a time when our heating bills are going up, and our
cooling bills. In December, household energy bills were up by more than
13 percent. The war in Iran has absolutely exacerbated that problem.
Gas prices are up more than 30 percent, over $4 a gallon. They are
approaching $5 a gallon. More and more commentators believe that the
Strait of Hormuz will be closed for much longer, indefinitely. We don't
know when. And that is also going to continue the pressure on the price
of home heating fuel.
You know, I do have a real contention with the administration when
President Trump, on the one hand, is zeroing out the home heating
assistance program, and cooling assistance as well, but on the other
hand, is pursuing policies that are driving up energy costs, as we saw
and are seeing with the war in Iran, which has closed the Strait of
Hormuz and is crippling the economy but is leading directly to higher
home heating fuel costs.
And that is in contrast with some of the comments that I can only
characterize as cruel and totally ``out of it'' by some of his
advisers. Kevin Hassett made a very telling remark to CNBC. Here is
what he said:
While it's very frustrating to go to the pump and see what
the price of gasoline looks like . . . the benefit for oil
producers is significant.
Seriously? What about your constituents and mine, who are paying the
price that is of benefit to the oil producers and then find out that
the home heating and cooling assistance help that they had last year is
going to be zeroed out this year. That is absolutely outrageous.
The only people benefitting from this energy crisis are people in Big
Oil. They are making an estimated $30 million windfall every hour.
The price goes up. It is painful for consumers and for businesses and
for farmers, but it is a windfall for the oil companies.
So shouldn't this Congress stand up and provide some help to maintain
some sense of security for the people we represent?
But by proposing a 100-percent cut to Federal LIHEAP funding,
President Trump has made it clear what his priority is. It is
accelerating the profits for the oil industry at the expense of people
who have absolutely no control over what the price is at the pump, what
the price is when that home heating gas or oil is being delivered to
their homes.
All of us are here and believing that we are fighting for the
families that we represent in our States, and I am fighting for Vermont
families. Last week, Senator Reed and I filed an amendment to the
Republican budget resolution that would protect LIHEAP from this
zeroing out in the Trump budget.
[[Page S2046]]
The amendment was not adopted. But I will keep fighting, and I hope
many of my colleagues will join me to protect LIHEAP so that there can
be some reassurance to the people who are going to be hammered and
threatened by the zeroing out of this program.
You know, in the past, Congress has, on a bipartisan basis, rejected
the administration's attempts to zero out the LIHEAP budget and
illegally fire the staff that oversees the disbursement of LIHEAP
funding to the States. That is why we included report language in the
fiscal year 2026 bill to require that funds that are allocated to
States be distributed on a timely basis. And that is true in Alabama,
and it is true in Vermont.
And I urge my colleagues to join those of us who want to make certain
this fuel assistance is available to families, regardless of whom they
voted for, regardless of policy orientation, and regardless of
politics.
This is not a red State or blue State issue. Americans everywhere are
paying for the reckless economic policies in this illegal war, and this
war is imposing substantial and daily and punitive costs on struggling
Americans, struggling farmers, and struggling businesses.
But all of us are in need of maintaining this program, and we can if
we come together to do it.
You know, Texas receives about $181 million in LIHEAP funding, and it
helps 65,000 households; in Nebraska, $32 million, 53,000 households.
So by attempting to zero out LIHEAP funding, the Trump administration
has said it loud and clear. It is plain before our eyes. They are
willing to throw Americans out in the cold or in the heat and are quite
content with a $30 million-an-hour windfall for the oil companies.
My hope is that we in Congress, whatever our differences are, can
work together to save and preserve the LIHEAP program, which is a
lifeline for so many people you represent and I represent.
I yield the floor.
(Mr. LANKFORD assumed the Chair.)
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Britt). The Senator from Kansas.