[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 73 (Monday, April 27, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H3116-H3117]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INCREASE IN RETIREMENT AGE OF UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE OFFICERS
Mrs. BICE. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill
(H.R. 8364) to amend title 5, United States Code, to authorize the
increase of the retirement age in the United States Capitol Police.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 8364
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RETIREMENT AGE OF UNITED STATES
CAPITOL POLICE OFFICERS.
(a) Civil Service Retirement System.--Section 8335(c) of
title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking ``becomes
60 years of age'' and inserting ``attains an age determined
by the Board that shall be not less than 57 years of age and
not more than 65 years of age''.
(b) Federal Employees' Retirement System.--Section 8425(c)
of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking
``becomes 60 years of age'' and inserting ``attains an age
determined by the Board that shall be not less than 57 years
of age and not more than 65 years of age''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentlewoman from
Oklahoma (Mrs. Bice) and the gentleman from New York (Mr. Morelle) each
will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from Oklahoma.
General Leave
Mrs. BICE. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have
5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and
include extraneous material on the bill.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentlewoman from Oklahoma?
There was no objection.
Mrs. BICE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
[[Page H3117]]
I rise today in support of Bryan Steil's legislation, H.R. 8364,
which extends the retirement waiver age for officers within the United
States Capitol Police.
I would like to thank Ranking Member Morelle for his collaboration on
this very important piece of legislation.
Mr. Speaker, threats against lawmakers are at all-time highs. This
weekend's events once again remind us of that reality.
Although we have seen a welcome and much-needed increase in
recruitment numbers, we continue to have staffing challenges within the
United States Capitol Police.
Together, these challenges have created difficult circumstances for
those who work tirelessly to keep visitors, staff, and lawmakers safe.
Under current law, officers are forced to retire at age 57, unless
they receive a waiver from the Capitol Police Board. With a waiver,
officers can continue to work until the age of 60.
H.R. 8364 will extend that waiver timeline to 65.
Right now, nearly 60 sworn officers are working on a waiver, which is
the equivalent of more than two recruitment classes. Without this
legislative change, they will all be forced to retire in the next few
years.
Under our legislation, the Capitol Police Board will have the
authority to grant waivers to sworn officers until they reach the age
of 65.
Notably, this is not the first time Congress has done something like
this. In 2004 and 2010, Congress temporarily raised the mandatory
Federal law enforcement retirement age from 60 to 65 to address
staffing shortfalls at the FBI.
Additionally, it is also important to note that our legislation gives
the Capitol Police Board the discretion to decide who is still fit for
the job.
The men and women of the U.S. Capitol Police do a tremendous job
protecting this institution. We shouldn't be forcing officers to retire
when we have staffing shortages that can be easily remedied by this one
change.
Again, I thank the ranking member and his staff for working closely
with us on this important matter, and I urge my colleagues to support
the legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, let me begin by offering my appreciation and thanks to
the gentlewoman from Oklahoma, my friend Mrs. Bice, for her leadership.
I extend my appreciation as well to the chair of the Committee on House
Administration, Bryan Steil, for his authorship and his partnership in
advancing this bill.
I rise in strong support of H.R. 8364, a bill that, as Mrs. Bice
indicated, would increase the age at which Capitol Police officers may
serve from 60 to 65 when granted a retirement age waiver by the Capitol
Police Board.
The men and women of the United States Capitol Police have one of the
most critical and demanding jobs in the legislative branch. This was
once again underscored over the weekend when Capitol Police officers
acted to protect Members of this House, including the Speaker and other
members of leadership from the latest attempt at political violence--
this time at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner.
We are all grateful that everyone who attended the dinner was able to
leave safely.
Capitol Police officers secure the Capitol campus, investigate
threats, provide protective details, screen visitors, respond to
emergencies, investigate crimes, monitor demonstrations, secure major
events, and more.
They do this all in an era of dramatically increased threats and
strain on the department, and I commend Chief Sullivan and former Chief
Manger for their diligent work rebuilding the force from the low point
it reached after January 6. I am pleased that the department has since
grown to more than 2,300 sworn officers. This is meaningful progress,
but there is still much more work to do.
{time} 1710
The large cohort of officers who joined the department after the
September 11 attacks is now reaching retirement age. That is kind of
hard to imagine, but that is the case.
The department cannot afford to lose those experienced, fully capable
officers solely because they reach an arbitrary age threshold.
This bill does not change the statutory retirement age of 57, but it
does give the Capitol Police Board discretion to allow an officer to
continue serving until the age of 65 when doing so is in the public
interest.
I want to make sure this is clear to people: Nothing in this bill
lessens the board's responsibility to ensure officers granted
exemptions remain fit for duty--fully fit and capable of meeting the
physical and operational demands of the job.
This is a prudent, targeted step to preserve experience, maintain
staffing, and help ensure the department has the workforce it needs.
For those reasons, I support the bill and urge my colleagues to do
the same. I thank my colleague and friend Mrs. Bice, as well as
Chairman Steil, for their leadership.
Mr. Speaker, this is an important, prudent, thoughtful measure, and
it will add to the safety and protection of the people in the Capitol
complex, whether it is Members, staff, or visitors. That is something I
know both sides of the aisle deeply appreciate and support.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support this bill, and I
yield back the balance of my time.
Mrs. BICE. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this measure,
and I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentlewoman from Oklahoma (Mrs. Bice) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, H.R. 8364.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________