[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 73 (Monday, April 27, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H3107-H3110]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




         DOUG LAMALFA FEDERAL DISASTER TAX RELIEF CERTAINTY ACT

  Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and 
pass the bill (H.R. 5366) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
codify and extend the rules for personal casualty losses arising from 
major disasters and the rules for the exclusion from gross income of 
compensation for losses or damages resulting from certain wildfires, as 
amended.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 5366

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Doug LaMalfa Federal 
     Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act''.

     SEC. 2. CODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF RULES FOR CASUALTY 
                   LOSSES ARISING FROM MAJOR DISASTERS.

       (a) In General.--Section 165(h) of the Internal Revenue 
     Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(6) Special rule for qualified net disaster losses.--
       ``(A) In general.--If an individual has a qualified net 
     disaster loss for any taxable year, the amount determined 
     under paragraph (2)(A)(ii) shall be the sum of--
       ``(i) such qualified net disaster loss, and
       ``(ii) so much of the excess referred to in the matter 
     preceding clause (i) of paragraph (2)(A) (reduced by the 
     amount in clause (i) of this subparagraph) as exceeds 10 
     percent of the adjusted gross income of the individual.
       ``(B) Qualified net disaster loss.--For purposes of 
     subparagraph (A), the term `qualified net disaster loss' 
     means the excess (if any) of--
       ``(i) qualified disaster-related personal casualty losses, 
     over
       ``(ii) personal casualty gains reduced by the portion of 
     such gains taken into account under paragraph (5)(B)(i).
       ``(C) Qualified disaster-related personal casualty 
     losses.--For purposes of this paragraph--
       ``(i) In general.--The term `qualified disaster-related 
     personal casualty losses' means losses described in 
     subsection (c)(3) (determined after application of paragraph 
     (1)) which arise in a qualified disaster area on or after the 
     first day of the incident period of the qualified disaster to 
     which such area relates, and which are attributable to such 
     disaster.
       ``(ii) Qualified disaster area.--The term `qualified 
     disaster area' means any area with respect to which a major 
     disaster has been declared by the President under section 401 
     of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
     Assistance Act if the incident period of the disaster with 
     respect to which such declaration is made begins on or after 
     December 28, 2019, and before January 1, 2027.
       ``(iii) Qualified disaster.--The term `qualified disaster' 
     means, with respect to any qualified disaster area, the 
     disaster by reason of which a major disaster was declared 
     with respect to such area.
       ``(iv) Incident period.--The term `incident period' means, 
     with respect to any qualified disaster, the period specified 
     by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as the period 
     during which such disaster occurred.''.
       (b) Dollar Limitation.--Section 165(h)(1) of such Code is 
     amended by striking ``$500 ($100 for taxable years beginning 
     after December 31, 2009)'' and inserting ``$100 ($500 in the 
     case of any qualified disaster-related personal casualty 
     losses (as defined in paragraph (6)(C))''.
       (c) Deduction Allowed to Individuals Who Do Not Elect to 
     Itemize Deductions.--Section 63(b) of such Code is amended--
       (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (6) and 
     inserting a comma,
       (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (7) and 
     inserting ``, and'', and
       (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
       ``(8) so much of the deduction allowed by section 165(a) as 
     is attributable to the qualified net disaster loss (as 
     defined in section 165(h)(6)(B)).''.
       (d) Effective Date.--
       (1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall 
     apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
       (2) Coordination with superceded provisions.--Section 
     304(b) of the Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act 
     of 2020 (division EE of Public Law 116-260) and section 70438 
     of Public Law 119-21 shall not apply to any taxable year 
     beginning after December 31, 2024.

[[Page H3108]]

  


     SEC. 3. CODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS 
                   INCOME OF COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES OR DAMAGES 
                   RESULTING FROM CERTAIN WILDFIRES.

       (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of 
     the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting 
     before section 140 the following new section:

     ``SEC. 139M. COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES OR DAMAGES RESULTING 
                   FROM CERTAIN WILDFIRES.

       ``(a) In General.--Gross income shall not include any 
     amount received by an individual as a qualified wildfire 
     relief payment.
       ``(b) Qualified Wildfire Relief Payment.--For purposes of 
     this section--
       ``(1) In general.--The term `qualified wildfire relief 
     payment' means any amount received by or on behalf of an 
     individual as compensation for losses, expenses, or damages 
     (including compensation for additional living expenses, lost 
     wages (other than compensation for lost wages paid by the 
     employer which would have otherwise paid such wages), 
     personal injury, death, or emotional distress) incurred as a 
     result of a qualified wildfire disaster, but only to the 
     extent the losses, expenses, or damages compensated by such 
     payment are not compensated for by insurance or otherwise.
       ``(2) Qualified wildfire disaster.--The term `qualified 
     wildfire disaster' means any Federally declared disaster (as 
     defined in section 165(i)(5)(A)) declared after December 31, 
     2014, and before January 1, 2027, as a result of any forest 
     or range fire.
       ``(c) Denial of Double Benefit.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of this title--
       ``(1) no deduction or credit shall be allowed (to the 
     individual for whose benefit a qualified wildfire relief 
     payment is made) for, or by reason of, any expenditure to the 
     extent of the amount excluded under this section with respect 
     to such expenditure, and
       ``(2) no increase in the basis or adjusted basis of any 
     property shall result from any amount excluded under this 
     section with respect to such property.''.
       (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part III 
     of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by 
     inserting before the item related to section 140 the 
     following new item:

``Sec. 139M. Compensation for losses or damages resulting from certain 
              wildfires.''.
       (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section 
     shall apply to payments received in taxable years beginning 
     after December 31, 2025.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Missouri (Mr. Smith) and the gentleman from California (Mr. Thompson) 
each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Missouri.


                             General Leave

  Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all 
Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and 
submit extraneous material on this bill under consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Missouri?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  I rise in support of H.R. 5366, the Doug LaMalfa Federal Disaster Tax 
Relief Certainty Act, bipartisan legislation introduced by 
Representatives Greg Steube, Mike Thompson, and Jimmy Panetta and named 
after our late colleague, Mr. Doug LaMalfa, who dedicated his life to 
public service and was a very strong advocate for helping so many of 
his constituents whose lives had been turned upside down by wildfires.
  The chief sponsor of this legislation, Representative Steube, hails 
from the State of Florida, which is no stranger to the worst of natural 
disasters, including hurricanes that have devastated communities there 
and everywhere.
  The bipartisan work that has been done in advancing this legislation 
speaks to the fact that no community in America is safe from a 
potential natural disaster. Every Member of this body has had to or 
will have to at some point respond to some level of devastation brought 
to the doorsteps of the folks who they represent because of a natural 
disaster.
  This bill appropriately extends an existing provision within the law 
that allows taxpayers to deduct personal casualty losses stemming from 
a natural disaster while also excluding wildfire disaster relief 
payments from taxable income. These are the commonsense measures that 
ensure Americans recovering from a disaster have fewer tax burdens and 
more resources to navigate their recovery.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as 
I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the Doug LaMalfa Federal 
Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act. I thank Mr. Smith for his work on 
this bill, and I thank Mr. Steube for his partnership.
  I represent communities in northern California that have been on the 
front lines of catastrophic wildfires for years. I sat with families 
who have watched their homes burn to the ground. I spoke with small 
business owners who lost not just their storefronts but their entire 
livelihoods. I met with farmers and growers who saw generations of work 
wiped out in a matter of hours.
  After all of that, after the fire trucks leave, after the smoke 
clears, after the cameras are gone, those families are left to navigate 
through the aftermath.
  They are dealing with insurance claims. They are trying to find 
temporary housing. They are figuring out how to rebuild their lives.
  Then they run into the tax code.
  In northern California, my constituents had to fight tooth and nail 
just to get basic, commonsense tax relief. Think about that.
  Congressman LaMalfa and I had to fight to pass this relief, and we 
worked to mobilize victims to speak out and demand that that tax relief 
be forthcoming.
  People who lost everything should not have to come to Washington, 
D.C., to fight for relief. We should not be asking disaster victims to 
lobby Congress in the middle of recovery. We should not be telling 
families that the help they receive to build their homes might come 
with a tax bill attached. We should not be forcing communities into 
uncertainty every single time disaster strikes.
  This legislation ensures that when Americans receive disaster relief 
they are not penalized by paying tax on that relief.

                              {time}  1600

  This is not just about the past. It is about what is happening right 
now.
  In Los Angeles, across southern California, in Hawaii, and in 
Colorado, families reeling from devastating fires are being forced to 
navigate the same uncertainty those in my district faced. They should 
not have to come back to Congress and ask for relief that we already 
know is necessary.
  Disaster relief should not depend on your ability to navigate 
Congress. It should be automatic. It should be fair, and it should be 
there when you need it.
  This bill is a step toward that goal. It reflects what we have 
learned from northern California. It reflects the realities facing 
communities in Los Angeles, Hawaii, and Colorado. This legislation is a 
great first step, and we should now work to make this relief permanent 
going forward.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation, and I 
reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may 
consume to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Steube), the sponsor of this 
legislation, who has been a very strong advocate for recovering from 
natural disasters, including the citizens of his home State of Florida.
  Mr. STEUBE. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 5366, the 
Doug LaMalfa Federal Tax Relief Certainty Act.
  When hurricanes, wildfires, floods, tornadoes, and other disasters 
strike, American families are left to rebuild their homes, their 
businesses, their communities, and their lives. When these moments 
arise, the last thing they need is the Federal Government making their 
recovery harder by taxing relief payments or denying fair treatment for 
disaster losses, nor should the government be creating uncertainty in 
the tax code.
  This legislation provides certainty to disaster victims by extending 
and codifying commonsense tax relief for Americans impacted by 
federally declared disasters. It allows individuals to deduct qualified 
disaster-related casualty losses without having to itemize, removes 
burdensome limitations that can prevent families from receiving relief, 
and ensures certain wildfire relief payments are not treated as taxable 
income.
  For families in Florida, this issue is not theoretical. We know all 
too well

[[Page H3109]]

what it means to rebuild after hurricanes, flooding, storm surge, and 
the aftermath of these disasters. Recovery does not happen overnight, 
and families should not be forced to navigate a confusing tax code, 
especially without certainty in what that code may be as they are still 
trying to repair their homes, replace their belongings, and get back on 
their feet.
  No one understood this better than our former colleague Doug LaMalfa 
of California. For 13 years, Doug served in Congress as a tireless 
advocate for disaster victims and spent years fighting to ensure 
families impacted by wildfires specifically receive fair treatment 
under the tax code.
  Last Congress, I was honored to fight along with Doug as I led a 
bipartisan coalition alongside our colleagues on the floor with us 
right now,   Jimmy Panetta,   Mike Thompson, and Jill Tokuda, as well 
as former Representative Bill Johnson of Ohio.
  Our historic efforts culminated with the Federal Disaster Tax Relief 
Act of 2023 being signed into law on December 12, 2024, delivering 
billions in disaster tax relief to millions of Americans across 48 
States.
  The bill we are voting on today builds upon that legislation. Today 
is an opportunity to secure disaster relief certainty for the wildfire 
victims that Doug LaMalfa spent years fighting for. It is also an 
opportunity to secure relief for disaster survivors who have 
experienced a tragic event since July 4, 2025, and who may experience 
one in 2026.
  With hurricane season on the horizon, it is critical that Floridians 
have certainty in the tax code.
  I thank Chairman Smith for his leadership in advancing this 
legislation through the Ways and Means Committee with unanimous 
bipartisan support. I also thank Senator Rick Scott for leading this 
bill in the Senate and being a tireless leader on this issue.
  I also thank my aforementioned colleagues on the other side of the 
aisle,   Jimmy Panetta,   Mike Thompson, and Jill Tokuda, for their 
commitment to securing disaster relief for their constituents and 
Americans regardless of political affiliation or geography.
  Finally, I thank Doug LaMalfa for being an ally, a friend, and a 
fighter. Doug is deeply missed in this institution, and naming this 
bill in his honor is a simple but meaningful tribute.
  Mr. Speaker, when Americans are recovering from disaster, they 
deserve clarity, certainty, and relief, not more red tape from 
Washington. I urge my colleagues to support the Doug LaMalfa Federal 
Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act.
  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Panetta), a valued member of the Ways 
and Means Committee and someone who has seen firsthand what devastating 
wildfires can do to your district.
  Mr. PANETTA. Mr. Speaker, I thank Mr. Thompson and Mr. Steube for 
allowing me to speak on this topic. I support the Doug LaMalfa Federal 
Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act.
  I am a proud cosponsor, co-lead of this bill with Representatives 
Greg Steube and Mike Thompson, a bill that would build on the Federal 
Disaster Tax Relief Act which we passed last Congress, thanks to the 
leadership of Representative Steube, a bill that would ensure that 
those impacted by disasters nationwide have continued access to tax 
relief.
  This is one of those bills, as you are going to hear from 
Representative Steube, from Mr. Thompson, and from Ms. Tokuda, that is 
not a partisan topic when it comes to providing proper tax relief for 
our constituents who have been affected by natural disasters, disasters 
that don't just affect red States or blue States. They affect 
all American States. That is why this bill is so important.

  It would extend the provisions of the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act 
through 2026 to, one, ensure that those affected by fires and natural 
disasters can claim the personal casualty loss deduction to help in the 
recovery. Two, would exempt fire settlements from taxation to avoid 
devastating tax bills on wildfire victims.
  Unfortunately, after most natural disasters, there are limitations in 
the tax code that make it very difficult for survivors to claim the 
casualty loss deduction for uninsured losses.
  Specifically, losses must be attributable to a federally declared 
disaster and exceed 10 percent of adjusted gross income. That prevents 
many from qualifying for tax relief. In fact, the tax code ends up 
penalizing fire victims by treating settlements from fires as income 
for tax purposes. That can trigger a bill, as we have heard, as large 
as 37 percent of the settlement.
  Now, the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act that was signed into law 
last Congress addresses those issues by ensuring that those who 
received settlements for certain wildfires, including payments from the 
Fire Victim Trust, do not have to pay taxes on those payments.
  It also designates certain federally declared disasters as qualified 
disasters for the purposes of determining personal casualty losses. 
That ensures that families who incurred uninsured losses due to a 
natural disaster, be it damage to their home or property, can declare 
that loss and lower their tax bill.
  If we do not pass this bill, the thousands of people who survived the 
2025 Los Angeles fires, who received settlements, risk a devastating 
tax bill and face limitations recouping uninsured losses.
  That is why Congress is acting in a bipartisan way to prevent the tax 
code from penalizing constituents who are trying to rebuild after such 
disasters.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this commonsense bill to 
extend the Federal Disaster Tax Relief Act, to help families all across 
America, from Hawaii to California to Florida and those in between, who 
are struck by natural disasters and get the necessary tax relief to 
recover, rebuild, and move forward with their lives.
  Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Fong).
  Mr. FONG. Mr. Speaker, I thank Congressman Steube for his leadership.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the Doug LaMalfa Federal Disaster 
Tax Relief Certainty Act, which includes my bill, the Doug LaMalfa 
Protect Innocent Victims of Taxation after Fire Extension Act, which 
was his bill that he originally fought for.
  I thank the Ways and Means Committee chairman, Chairman Smith, the 
members of the committee, and the committee staff who made this bill a 
priority.
  In California, we are all too familiar with the devastation caused by 
wildfires. After these disasters strike in our community, survivors 
shouldn't have to worry about burdensome Federal taxes as they work to 
recover and rebuild.
  Today, we have an opportunity to address that while honoring my 
friend the late Doug LaMalfa, who was a tireless champion of rural 
California and an advocate for those rebuilding after wildfires.
  This section of the bill allows for wildfire victims to receive 
disaster aid incurred from a wildfire to have that payment exempted 
from gross income filings. This would exclude wildfire recovery 
payments from Federal income taxation through 2032.
  Without this extension, victims of catastrophic wildfires would again 
have their relief payments subject to Federal income tax obligations. 
For families and individuals who have lost everything, this can make 
all the difference.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to support this critical 
legislation.

                              {time}  1610

  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the 
gentlewoman from Hawaii (Ms. Tokuda). She has seen devastating wildfire 
that impacted her district and her constituents, and she has done great 
work to bring relief to them.
  Ms. TOKUDA. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chair and my colleagues who have 
co-led and provided leadership on this important bill: Representative 
Steube, Representative Thompson, and Representative Panetta.
  I rise today, like so many of my colleagues on both sides of the 
aisle, to honor our friend Doug LaMalfa. He understood that the 
disaster after the disaster happens when families cannot recover and 
return to their hometowns because the funding and resources they 
receive just don't stretch far enough or, worse, are taxed and taken 
away from people who need absolutely every single dollar to be able to 
rebuild.

[[Page H3110]]

  On Saturday, I stood above Lahaina, and for a moment--the briefest of 
moments--in the darkness, the town almost looked normal. Immediately, 
you realize that something is missing: no warm glow from homes and 
businesses, no kids riding bikes, and no neighbors gathering in 
garages.
  The people of Lahaina were not counting on that day. They did not 
seek or ask to lose their homes, their businesses, their livelihoods, 
their history, or their loved ones.
  They should be able to count on this: that every dollar and every 
resource meant to help them rebuild, recover, and return home stays 
with them in their pockets, not in government coffers.
  As I stand here today wearing Doug's pin above my heart, I know he is 
up there smiling right now. Doug believed recovery should not come with 
a tax bill, and the Doug LaMalfa Federal Disaster Tax Relief Certainty 
Act makes sure of that.
  As we all know too well, the burden of those touched by fire, flood, 
hurricane, tornado, or disaster is already too much to bear. It is 
already far too heavy. We should not be making it heavier.
  Mr. Speaker, for my constituents, and disaster and wildfire survivors 
everywhere, let's stand with them in this moment and every moment to 
come. Let's show them some aloha. Let's make sure that we all vote 
``yes'' on this bill.
  Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to close, and I 
reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance 
of my time to close.
  Mr. Speaker, this bill is about basic fairness. When Americans lose 
their homes to wildfires or other disasters, the last thing they should 
face is a tax bill on the help they received to rebuild that home.
  My constituents in northern California had to fight for that relief. 
Families in Los Angeles should not have to do the same, nor should they 
in Colorado, Hawaii, or anyplace else.
  Let's pass this bill today and then do the work to make these 
protections permanent so no disaster victim has to come back to 
Congress for relief ever again.
  Mr. Speaker, this legislation is rightfully named after our former 
colleague and friend, Doug LaMalfa, who worked hard to protect his fire 
victims. We should pass this bill.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge everyone to vote ``yes,'' and I yield back the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my 
time to close.
  Mr. Speaker, in 2024, Congress acted to provide critical tax relief 
for Americans hit hard by natural disasters. The goal was clear: 
Provide relief to those who need it most.
  With this legislation before us today, we have the opportunity to 
continue ensuring victims of natural disasters, including wildfires, 
continue to receive the relief that they deserve and the resources they 
desperately need to recover and rebuild.
  I thank Representative Steube for this bill and for his hard work to 
appropriately pay tribute to our late colleague, Mr. LaMalfa, on an 
issue that was such a passion for him.
  Mr. Speaker, I encourage my colleagues to support this legislation, 
and I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Hurd of Colorado). The question is on 
the motion offered by the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Smith) that the 
House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 5366, as amended.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________