[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 73 (Monday, April 27, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H3100-H3101]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BARCODE AUTOMATION FOR REVENUE COLLECTION TO ORGANIZE DISBURSEMENT AND
ENHANCE EFFICIENCY ACT
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and
pass the bill (H.R. 6956) to require electronically prepared tax
returns to include scannable code when submitted on paper, and to
require the use of optical character recognition technology for paper
documents received by the Internal Revenue Service, as amended.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 6956
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Barcode Automation for
Revenue Collection to Organize Disbursement and Enhance
Efficiency Act'' or the ``BARCODE Efficiency Act''.
SEC. 2. SCANNING AND DIGITIZATION OF TAX RETURNS AND
CORRESPONDENCE.
(a) Returns Prepared Electronically and Submitted on
Paper.--With respect to any Federal tax return which is
prepared electronically, but is printed and filed on paper--
(1) such return shall be formatted in a manner that is
compatible with the scanning technology referred to in
paragraph (2), and
(2) subject to subsection (b)(1)(B), the Internal Revenue
Service shall use scanning technology to convert the data
included in such return to electronic format.
(b) Optical Character Recognition Software.--With respect
to--
(1) any Federal tax return which--
(A) is not prepared electronically and is printed and filed
on paper, or
(B) is described in subsection (a)(1) but, for any reason,
the data included in such return cannot be accurately
converted into electronic format, or
(2) any correspondence which is received by the Internal
Revenue Service in a paper form (with the exception of any
such correspondence which has been received by the Internal
Revenue Service in electronic format),
the Internal Revenue Service shall use optical character
recognition technology (or any functionally similar
technology) to transcribe such return or correspondence.
(c) Exception.--
(1) In general.--Subsection (a) or (b) shall not apply to
the extent that the Secretary of the Treasury or the
Secretary's delegate determines that the technology described
in such subsection is slower or less reliable than--
(A) the process of manually transcribing returns or
correspondence received in a paper form, or
(B) any other process that the Internal Revenue Service is
using or would otherwise use.
(2) Report to congress.--Any exception to the application
of subsection (a) or (b) pursuant to paragraph (1) shall not
take effect unless the Secretary provides a report to the
Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Finance of the Senate regarding the
determination made under such paragraph within 30 days of
such determination.
(d) Effective Date.--This section shall apply to--
(1) any individual income tax return (as defined in section
6011(e)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) received
on or after January 1 of the first calendar year beginning
more than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act,
(2) any estate tax return (as described in section 6018 of
such Code) or gift tax return (as described in section 6019
of such Code) received on or after January 1 of the first
calendar year beginning more than 24 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, and
(3) any other return or correspondence received on or after
January 1 of the first calendar year beginning more than 18
months after the date of enactment of this Act.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Missouri (Mr. Smith) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Schneider)
each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Missouri.
General Leave
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all
Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks
and submit extraneous material on this bill under consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Missouri?
There was no objection.
{time} 1510
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 6956, the Barcode Automation
for Revenue Collection to Organize Disbursement and Enhance Efficiency
Act, also known as the BARCODE Efficiency Act, which is a bipartisan
piece of legislation introduced by Representatives Rudy Yakym and Brad
Schneider.
Many government agencies have had to be dragged kicking and screaming
into the 21st century. The IRS is no exception. However, in the case of
the BARCODE Efficiency Act, all we are really asking the IRS to do is
to adopt technology that has been around for decades.
By requiring the IRS to deploy scanning technology for certain
returns and correspondence, this bill will streamline the tax filing
process for millions of Americans and go a long way to improving
accuracy over the previous method of manually entering data from paper
tax returns.
This most recent tax filing season, where Americans saw a historic 11
percent increase in refunds, with the average refund of over $3,200,
has just concluded. Had this legislation been in law already, Americans
would have gotten back what they were owed even faster.
As a key leader on the Ways and Means Committee's oversight efforts,
Representative Yakym has been a strong advocate for improving customer
service at the IRS and battling to save taxpayers time and money.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SCHNEIDER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 6956, the BARCODE Efficiency
Act, which I am proud to introduce with my friend and colleague,
Representative Yakym from Indiana.
This bill would help expedite the digital transition at IRS,
requiring the IRS to implement scanning technology to speed up paper
return processing. In tax year 2023, the IRS reports that around 7
percent of tax returns were filed on paper. Now, 7 percent may sound
like a small number, Mr. Speaker, until you realize it represents
approximately 10 million paper returns to be opened and processed. That
is more than the entire population of New York City, our most populous
city. In fact, that is more than the population of all but 10 U.S.
States.
This bill will help expedite the process of these 10 million returns
by directing the IRS to adopt barcode scanning and optical character
recognition, or OCR, technology.
For those wondering why this bill is necessary, you only need to
learn about the current intake process for paper returns in the IRS.
Millions of Americans still use paper returns, including both returns
prepared electronically but printed and filed on paper and any
handwritten returns and paper correspondence.
Currently, when a paper return arrives at the IRS, an employee
manually transcribes the data into IRS systems line by line by line by
line. This process is not only time-consuming, it is costly and often
inaccurate. Data entry errors from manual transcription are common and
cost the American taxpayers money.
Return processing delays translates directly into refund delays,
needlessly
[[Page H3101]]
causing financial hardship for taxpayers with limited savings or fixed
incomes.
Data transcription errors can lead to prolonged disputes, and the
issues compound from there. A data entry error can cause math error
notices requiring taxpayers to respond to the IRS if they disagree with
the adjustments made. Errors also cause taxpayers to wait even longer
for resolution, requiring more documentation from the taxpayer, more
calls, and more correspondence to the IRS as delays continue to build.
These extra steps all add to the backlog at the IRS costing all
taxpayers more money and eroding trust in the overall tax system.
The good news is that we have a solution. The BARCODE Efficiency Act
will require the IRS to implement scanning technology and dramatically
reduce the number of paper tax returns that require manual data entry,
thereby accelerating processing and improving taxpayer service.
IRS' problems with digitization and processing paper returns have
long been an area of focus for the National Taxpayer Advocate, which
listed the IRS' challenges in processing and digitization as the first
and second most serious problems at the IRS in last year's annual
report to Congress.
I, again, extend my appreciation to my friend, Representative Yakym,
for his partnership working to address this problem with commonsense
solutions. I thank Chairman Smith and Ranking Member Neal for their
support of this bipartisan legislation.
I also extend my thanks to the Taxpayer Advocate Service for their
recommendation that led to the creation of this bill and for their
critical, ongoing work to reduce taxpayer burden and improve the IRS'
performance.
I am proud that this bill has the support of both the National
Taxpayers Union and the American Coalition for Taxpayer Rights, the
national trade association made up of retail tax preparation and tax
software companies.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill to help the
IRS operate more efficiently and better serve the American taxpayer,
and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may
consume to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Yakym), who is the co-lead
of this legislation and who is a critical member of the Ways and Means
Committee fighting for oversight and keeping his eye on the IRS.
Mr. YAKYM. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of H.R. 6956, the
BARCODE Efficiency Act. I am proud to co-lead this act with my friend
from Illinois (Mr. Schneider).
This is a simple but powerful bill that will make tax return
processing faster, more accurate, and more efficient. E-filing taxes is
becoming even more common. In 2009, two-thirds of taxpayers e-filed
their returns. By 2015, it was up to 85 percent. Last year, 94 percent
of taxpayers e-filed their returns. That remaining 6 percent still
accounts for 10 million tax returns.
There are good reasons to file a paper return. I actually found
myself in such a position last year. After I electronically filed my
taxes, as most taxpayers do, the IRS continued to kick back my return,
trying to convince me that I owed the IRS less money than I actually
did.
We reran the numbers time and time again, but we still came up with
the same results. We had a few choices at this point. We could either
file the return, as the IRS suggested, and risk later on owing a lot of
money in penalties and interest and things like that, or we could call
them up and get into an argument with somebody at the IRS, or we could
just simply print it off and file the return. That is exactly what we
chose to do.
The problem is once we file that return, and my return this last year
was 202 pages, there is someone at the IRS who actually manually enters
in every single digit on all 202 pages. Just imagine the problems that
could create, Mr. Speaker. If someone transposes a number, then all of
a sudden, you have an inaccurate return and the IRS can later come
after you for an audit. Or, Mr. Speaker, you may have substantial
delays in receiving your refund because of the amount of time it takes
to manually key in all that data. It is just simply a waste of time and
a waste of resources.
There are better ways of handling that, and, frankly, I think it is
time for the IRS to come into the 21st century. That is why my
colleague, Mr. Schneider, and I have introduced the bipartisan BARCODE
Efficiency Act. This would require that the IRS increase its usage of
scanning technology, particularly for paper or handwritten returns. No
more manual entry would be needed or required. This will certainly
complement efforts already underway by the Trump administration to
phase out the use of paper and to adopt scanning technology. Scanning
technology has been recommended by the taxpayer advocate as well as the
GAO, and it has been used by State tax agencies for years.
Paper returns will still be necessary at times, but we can do better,
Mr. Speaker, because there is proven commercially available technology
that can end the hand entry of tax returns. It will increase the speed,
the efficiency, and the accuracy of processing. It will get refunds out
the door quicker so Hoosiers, whom I serve, can get their money back
faster.
Again, quite simply, it is time for the IRS to come into the 21st
century.
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague across the aisle Mr. Schneider for
his great work in getting this bill introduced. I would also like to
thank Chairman Smith and Chairman Schweikert for their partnership as
well as Senators Young and Warnock.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bipartisan
commonsense bill.
{time} 1520
Mr. SCHNEIDER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
I am proud that we are here today to advance this seemingly modest,
bipartisan bill that will have an outsized impact to improve service at
the IRS.
I have long championed investing in modernization at the IRS to
improve taxpayer service and make government more efficient. The
archaic, manual transcription process that IRS currently uses to
process paper returns results in significant delays that can last
months or even years and cause severe hardship.
It is long past time that the IRS implement scanning technology to
improve the speed and accuracy of processing these returns.
Implementing a modernization process is a commonsense change with
bipartisan support that will reduce refund delays, all the while
lowering administrative costs.
No matter how Americans file their taxes--digitally or by paper--they
should be able to rely on timely resolution and quality service from
our IRS.
I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I yield back the
balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my
time.
Many Americans have had to endure frustration and anxiety at the
hands of the IRS bureaucracy when it comes to filing or waiting on
their tax returns to be processed. Anything we can do to make this
process more efficient and user-friendly for the American taxpayer is
well worth our time.
If we are reforming our tax code to provide more relief to working
families, we should be modernizing our tax agency to get that relief to
them as soon as possible.
I encourage my colleagues to support this legislation, and I yield
back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Smith) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, H.R. 6956, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________