[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Page S1673]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. PADILLA:
S.J. Res. 152. A joint resolution providing for congressional
disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
submitted by the Department of Labor relating to the Adverse Effect
Wage Rate Methodology; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Mr. PADILLA. Mr. President, I rise today in support of the
Congressional Review Act resolution to overturn the Department of
Labor's recent rule that cuts wages for farmworkers across this
country.
We are very fortunate here in the United States because many of us
are used to grocery stores stocked with fresh food. But far too little
thought gets paid to where that food comes from or to the millions of
farmworkers whose grueling labor gets it there.
Every day, millions of women and men wake up before dawn and head to
the fields to feed this Nation. Through heat waves, storms, wildfire
smoke--even pandemics--they show up so we can eat. These are some of
the hardest jobs in America. Trust me, I know from experience.
A few years back, I became the first Senator to join farmworkers in
the fields for a day--cutting parsley and radishes alongside them in
Southern California. many of the workers I met were older than me and
had done this work for decades. Together, we spent hours on our hands
and knees filling crates with produce. And let me tell you--I couldn't
keep up. I was a whole lot slower than the highly skilled farmworkers
who helped me out that day.
Because while most people don't think twice about where their food
comes from, farmworkers bring extraordinary skill, discipline, and
pride to their work. They deserve our gratitude, they deserve our
respect, and they deserve to be paid fairly, because if they miss a
day, there is no safety net for them to fall back on.
Yet, knowing all that, folks at the Labor Department who created this
rule decided to go ahead and attack them anyway. They decided to go
ahead and slash farmworker wages by as much as $5 to $7 an hour. By the
Labor Department's own estimate, this rule would transfer more than $2
billion out of workers' pockets and into employers' hands every year,
and it does so in a way that undercuts both U.S. farmworkers and the
very purpose of the H-2A Program, which is supposed to protect, not
depress, domestic wages.
This is not a technical adjustment. It is one of the largest wealth
transfers from workers to employers in the history of American
agriculture, and the consequences are both very real and immediate. In
California, farmworker wages could drop from nearly $20 an hour to
under $17. In Michigan, it could go from over $18 to under $14, and
from $16 to under $11 an hour in Georgia.
Let's be clear: Farmworkers are not asking for special treatment;
they are asking for fair pay for hard work. Instead, this rule rigs the
system against them. It incentivizes hiring lower-paid guestworkers
while making it easier to displace U.S. workers. All that does is
accelerate a race to the bottom in agricultural labor standards.
But just as troubling as the rule itself is the fact that it was
issued without providing a meaningful opportunity for public comment,
without good cause. That is not a minor procedural error or
technicality; that is a clear violation of the Administrative Procedure
Act. It is a fundamental breach of the law governing how Agencies make
decisions in a democracy that significantly impact the public.
The Administrative Procedure Act exists for a reason--to ensure
transparency, accountability, and public participation. Farmworkers,
advocates, employers, and communities deserved to have a voice in a
rule that so directly affects their livelihoods. Instead, the
Department rushed it through as an interim final rule, cutting wages
first and asking questions later.
This is an example of exactly why the Congressional Review Act
exists--so that Congress can step in when an agency overreaches, when
it ignores the law and harms the very people it's supposed to protect.
This resolution sets out to make things right by restoring fairness
and restoring the rule of law. I urge all of my colleagues to support
this resolution by standing with the farmworkers who put food on our
tables, not the powerful interests looking to cut their wages.
____________________