[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1605-S1609]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




SCARPER RIDGE GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT 
                                  ACT

  The Senate proceeded to consider the bill (S. 1142) to adjust the 
boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area to include the 
Scarper Ridge property, was ordered to be engrossed for a third 
reading, was read the third time, and passed, as follows:

                                S. 1142

         Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives 
     of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

         This Act may be cited as the ``Scarper Ridge Golden Gate 
     National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act''.

     SEC. 2. SCARPER RIDGE BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

         Section 2(a)(2) of Public Law 92-589 (16 U.S.C. 460bb-
     1(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
         ``(F) Land generally depicted as `Proposed Boundary 
     Addition' on the map entitled `Golden Gate National 
     Recreation Area Proposed Boundary Addition', numbered 641/
     193973, and dated July 2024.''.

  Mr. JUSTICE. How about that, guys? Now we are rolling.
  So at the end of the day, I could go through this wonderful speech 
that I had, but really and truly, we are there. God bless each and 
every one of those unbelievable heroes that have delivered for this 
great Nation.
  And, Madam President, I thank you so much. It has been a big-time 
honor flying with you. So proud--can't be more proud than I am right 
now.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Tennessee.
  Mrs. BLACKBURN. Madam President, I so appreciate our colleague from 
West Virginia and his commitment to our Nation's veterans and today, on 
Medal of Honor Day, that he was taking the time to recognize them. We 
are grateful for that and grateful for their service and their 
sacrifice, and know that we are able to continue the work we do for our 
great Nation because of the service that they have rendered to our 
Nation.


                    Department of Homeland Security

  Madam President, on Monday, I had the honor of joining President 
Trump in Memphis. This was his first visit to our great State after 
launching the Memphis Safe Task Force, last year.
  And we were so thrilled with this. The task force has been working in 
Memphis for the last 6 months. And as we put that task force into 
place, what we saw is a city that has really transformed for the 
better.
  Now, the reason the task force came to be is because Memphis, TN, in 
2024 had the highest per capita crime rate of any city in this country. 
There were over 100 gangs that were there, vehicle thefts, carjackings, 
cargo theft. The list went on and on--aggravated assault, violent 
crime, murder.
  What we saw was a rising crime rate, and regardless of how much 
energy local law enforcement put into this, apprehending criminals, 
there was a Soros-backed DA. It was a revolving door, and nothing 
seemed to get better.
  Well, as Kash Patel and AG Bondi came before me before their 
Judiciary Committee hearings, I presented each of them with a crime 
stat sheet. These were the crime stats of Memphis.
  I asked for their help. They committed for their help. At their 
hearings, they publicly committed for that help. And last summer, we 
started Operation Viper, and then, what we saw was a success. And 
because of that Operation Viper success with the FBI working with local 
police, then, last September, we started the Memphis Safe Task Force.
  It is local, State, and Federal elected officials working with local, 
State, and Federal agencies, all working together: the mayor of 
Memphis; Chief Davis, the chief of police; our National Guard; 
Tennessee Highway Patrol; Tennessee Bureau of Investigations; 30 
Federal

[[Page S1606]]

Agencies; our U.S. marshal; our U.S. attorney. And, yes, a difference 
is being made.
  Residents had talked a lot about Memphis in 2024. They honestly could 
not walk outside their houses. Kids could not play outside. They were 
concerned about being robbed, assaulted, murdered, and seeing criminal 
gangs turn their community into a war zone.
  Now, the fact that we have had such success in Memphis in dropping 
that crime rate by nearly 50 percent--50 percent--we are the example, 
the model, of how you can get in behind this and change what is 
happening with crime.
  Some of the stats are that we have seen a 40-percent drop in sexual 
assault in Memphis, a 56-percent drop in robbery, a 68-percent drop in 
motor vehicle theft, a 36-percent drop in murder.
  That is what happens when your mayor, your police chief, and your 
agencies are working in partnership getting criminals off the streets.
  Now, since September, these combined agencies have made over 9,000 
arrests, and more than 3,300 of those were for violent criminals, 
violent offenders.
  Among them are hundreds of warrant arrests for domestic violence, 
aggravated assault, weapons crimes, as well as dozens more for sexual 
assault and homicide. These criminals are among the worst of the worst.
  In late February, in 1 day, the authorities arrested a 26-year-old 
woman wanted for killing a 2-year-old baby. You know, that is pretty 
hard to hear. The Presiding Officer and I are grandmamas. We love these 
little ones. Hard to fathom somebody would kill a 2-year-old. This is 
the type criminal they have taken off the streets. They also arrested a 
23-year-old man facing charges of first-degree murder, aggravated 
robbery, aggravated assault, and reckless endangerment with a deadly 
weapon and a 24-year-old man wanted for drug distribution and 
possession of prohibited firearms.
  Members of the task force are working every single day to apprehend 
these individuals, and while they are apprehending them, they have 
recovered more than 2,200 illegal firearms, 1,200 stolen vehicles, 
and--get this--they have rescued more than 150 missing children.
  You know, in the Biden administration, they lost track of about 500 
children. Everyone said: Well, where are these children? What could 
have happened?
  Because of the good work of these Federal, State, and local agencies 
and law enforcement, yes, indeed, 150 missing children.
  This operation has been so successful in Memphis. It really ought not 
to surprise anyone in this Chamber. Sixty-two percent of Memphis 
citizens say the initiative has been effective at reducing crime, and 
86 percent support hiring more police officers.
  Imagine that. Everybody working together regardless of your political 
party, regardless of whether you are State, local, Federal. You have 86 
percent of the population of the city saying: Let's do more of this.
  Seventy-seven percent say: Let's build a new jail so we can keep 
these criminals off the street.
  I am incredibly optimistic about the future of Memphis.
  I am so grateful to President Trump, Director Patel, AG Bondi, and 
Secretary Hegseth, along with all the other Federal Agencies, for their 
commitment.


                    Department of Homeland Security

  Madam President, you know, as we have heard on the floor today, it is 
the 40th day of the Democrats' shutdown of the Department of Homeland 
Security.
  This is already one of the longest shutdowns in our Nation's history, 
and what we know is that our DHS employees have gone 46 percent of this 
fiscal year without a paycheck. This is something that is immoral.
  Our colleagues across the aisle have voted not once or twice but 
seven times not to fund our DHS employees. So I think that it is 
incredible that they are doing this because they have two goals, and we 
know these are their goals because they have been on TV talking about 
this. They have talked to their base about these goals.
  Goal No. 1, abolish ICE. They are all about it. They want to abolish 
ICE.
  Goal No. 2, they want to defund law enforcement. Now, they have been 
on this for years. They had told their base that they were going to 
find a way to do this, so they think that not paying TSA workers is a 
way to do this. They think that not paying DHS employees is a way to 
get to their goal.
  Well, they are sadly mistaken, and the American people are figuring 
this out, that what they are doing in order to punish ICE for upholding 
the rule of law and removing violent criminals from communities--that 
it is OK to make people hurt, to make people suffer. I think that it is 
so immoral, what they are doing.
  Now, of course, they are fully aware that ICE is funded through 2029. 
If they had read the Working Families Tax Cut, the Big Beautiful Bill, 
they would be aware of this. But, no, they didn't take the time to read 
the good things that were in that bill because they had made their 
minds up. They were going to vote no. Regardless of what happened, they 
were going to vote no.
  So they think it is OK to punish Secret Service agents, TSA officers, 
coastguardsmen, our cyber security professionals, and our homeland 
security investigators so that they can try to abolish ICE.
  Now, President Trump is doing everything he can to alleviate the pain 
the Democrats are causing. You see Republicans have made concessions.
  It was: We want a change of leadership at DHS.
  Well, that change has taken place.
  We want to end the Minnesota surge with ICE.
  That has ended.
  We want to end roving patrols.
  That has been done.
  We want to change policies around protesters. We want to change 
policies at detention facilities.
  All of that has been done.
  Body cameras--that has been done.
  What they continue to do is move the goalposts. Nothing is ever good 
enough because the only thing they want--abolish ICE and defund law 
enforcement.
  So regardless of what we bring forward, regardless of what is 
offered, they have decided they are a big, fat, whopping no.
  They do not give a ripping flip what happens to TSA agents and their 
families--people that are sleeping in cars, people that can't pay their 
mortgage, people that can't pay for childcare, people that are not able 
to go to work because of this. They are not concerned about the 450 
agents that have already turned in their badges and said: We can't hack 
this. We have to have a job where we are paid every time we go to work 
for every hour we work rather than being paid 46 percent of the time.
  I think it is so important that we realize they are standing up for 
illegal aliens. You know, they are standing up for criminals like Jose 
Medina-Medina, who was charged last week with shooting and killing 
Sheridan Gorman, an 18-year-old college student at Loyola University in 
Chicago who was out walking with her friends.

  There was a Chicago alderman who said: This was a kid in the wrong 
place at the wrong time.
  How totally insensitive and disgusting can that be. I will tell you 
who was in the wrong place--it was an illegal alien who had a rap 
sheet, who came here under the Biden administration. He goes out and is 
charged with theft within a couple of weeks of being here, and the 
revolving door starts for him.
  I think you have to look at this--somebody that is a repeat offender. 
They have no right to be here. And that guy, that alleged killer from 
Venezuela, should never have been anywhere near that young woman.
  I think it is also important that we look at the fact that there is 
new leadership at DHS.
  Our colleagues should be willing to fund DHS and stop repeatedly 
voting to shut the thing down and support the rule of law in this 
country.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Nebraska.


                            SAVE America Act

  Mrs. FISCHER. Madam President, only U.S. citizens should be voting in 
U.S. elections. That is not a controversial statement; that is common 
sense. And Republicans believe in that statement. We believe we need to 
protect voting in our elections. But I think our colleagues on the 
other side of the aisle want to make those elections less secure. This 
is against the will of most Americans and against the will of their own 
voters.

[[Page S1607]]

  The SAVE America Act is simple: It requires proof of citizenship to 
register to vote and requires a photo ID when you go to cast a ballot. 
Common sense. It has overwhelming public support, but Democrats stand 
in opposition.
  The polling numbers are clear. A recent CBS News poll shows that 80 
percent of Americans support requiring a photo ID to vote, and that 
includes 65 percent of Democrats. A Pew Research Center poll finds that 
83 percent of voters support photo ID at the polls, and that includes 
71 percent of Democrats. Sixty-six percent of Americans support 
requiring documents showing proof of citizenship in order to register 
to vote.
  Proof of citizenship is required when you apply for government 
benefits. It is required when you join the military. Every single job 
in this country requires new hires to fill out a form I-9 proving they 
are eligible to work here. Americans show photo ID to drive a car, to 
pick up their kids early from school, to check into a hotel, to 
purchase cold medicine at the pharmacy, to board a plane, and to get a 
library card. If we expect this of Americans in these instances, why on 
Earth shouldn't we expect it when they vote?
  We have applied this program in my home State of Nebraska. In 2023, 
Nebraska adopted a law through the voter-driven initiative process 
requiring voters to provide an ID with their name and photo when they 
vote. There are a lot of acceptable forms of ID in Nebraska: a driver's 
license, a State ID card, a U.S. passport, a military ID, a Tribal ID. 
My State of Nebraska found a sensible way to verify voters' identity 
without restricting access for eligible voters. In fact, Nebraskans can 
get an ID and a certified copy of their birth certificate at no cost if 
they don't have one.
  Here in Washington, Democrats have spent the past few weeks waffling 
on this issue. In fact, Senator Schumer recently announced that 
Democrats do support voter ID. You know, that is great. Vote for it.
  My colleague Senator Husted, a former chief election official in his 
home State of Ohio, decided to take Senator Schumer at his word.
  He offered a clean, basic photo ID bill, just a simple requirement to 
show voter ID at the polls: a driver's license, a military ID, a Tribal 
ID, or a passport.
  Well, guess what happened? The Democrats blocked it. They are 
completely unserious on this issue. They are out of step with the 
majority of Americans. The stakes couldn't be higher. America's 
election integrity is on the line. The SAVE America Act is a 
commonsense solution, proof of citizenship to register and photo ID to 
vote.
  Every Democrat will be put on the record, and the American people 
will be watching. I urge my colleagues to support the SAVE America Act.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Connecticut.


                          Reproductive Health

  Mr. BLUMENTHAL. Mr. President, as we stand here in the comfort of the 
U.S. Capitol on this beautiful spring day, men and women are in harm's 
way, serving this country, sacrificing for our defense in the Middle 
East.
  And I emphasize women, as well as men, are bravely and steadfastly 
sacrificing away from their families, away from their homes, away from 
the comfort that we take for granted.
  Women are the fastest growing demographic in our military. They are 
performing combat tasks, as well as support. They are serving in every 
aspect of our U.S. military, and we are the better for it.
  We have encouraged more women to join the ranks of our military 
because of the tremendous talent, energy, patriotism, insight, 
compassion, and loyalty that they bring to service. And now, we are 
betraying them. Now, we are constricting the healthcare available to 
them, purposefully, simply out of ideological bias.
  On New Year's Eve, the Trump administration greeted 2026 by quietly, 
indeed secretively, implementing a near-total abortion ban at the VA. 
It is a new policy that targets women veterans, many of them survivors 
of sexual assault or with service-connected disabilities or conditions. 
Shamefully, they rob those veterans of access to essential healthcare, 
hundreds of thousands of them, even when their healthcare is at risk or 
they have been raped.
  In the post-Dobbs world, this new policy is dangerous, and it is 
cruel. It severely jeopardizes women veterans' health and safety. It 
prioritizes culture wars and political games over our Nation's heroes. 
It disrespects and endangers more than 462,000 women of reproductive 
age, and that number is growing because more women are serving. They 
are enrolled in the VA healthcare system, and they live in States where 
there are abortion bans or restrictions. So the VA is their only source 
of healthcare when it comes to abortion.
  On behalf of these women, I urge passage today of my Congressional 
Review Act resolution to overturn this abhorrent new policy, which 
imposes not only a ban on reproductive rights care but also counseling. 
It is a gag order imposed on healthcare providers who should be free to 
advise and guide women in making these life-changing decisions about 
what to do with their own bodies, and this counseling is necessary for 
them to make those decisions about what to do with their futures.
  And sometimes, they may be advised to have children when they may be 
doubtful about it. The point is that politicians shouldn't be dictating 
to our Nation's heroes--our veterans--what kind of futures and 
decisions about their families they should be making. It should be 
those women veterans consulting doctors.
  A ban with the primary purpose of preventing women veterans to 
receive abortion care or counseling, even if they are victims of rape 
or incest, even if their health is at risk, is absolutely disgusting 
and dangerous. And keep in mind healthcare should include abortion. 
Abortion is healthcare. Healthcare is a human right, and it is not just 
care but also counseling. It is simply no way to treat veterans who 
have raised their right hand and been willing to die for their country 
and who right now are, in fact, in harm's way, serving their country.
  Last month, I joined women veterans to discuss the practical impact 
of this rule. I want to talk about some of their stories and read some 
of what they had to say because they bravely shared the practical 
impacts, and they highlight the human impact of this administration's 
archaic and perilous policy.
  Alex, for example, is an Air Force veteran and a sexual assault 
survivor. During her second miscarriage, she was not provided with the 
care she needed, and it nearly cost her her life.
  Alex and her husband are terrified to get pregnant again in light of 
her experience when she nearly bled to death when suffering a 
miscarriage and care was denied to her. An OB-GYN finally intervened. 
She was horrified when she learned the severity of her situation, but 
it potentially compromised her fertility.
  In her own words:

       Due to complex service-connected health conditions, 
     pregnancy is very high risk for me. In order to get pregnant 
     again, I need to know I can trust my doctors. I need the 
     ability to have difficult, in-depth conversations with them, 
     that they are with my health and I every step of the way, and 
     will without hesitation step in to save my life and fertility 
     if something goes wrong. However, with this new ban, I no 
     longer have that faith in the VA . . . As a result, my 
     husband and I may never get to realize our dream anymore.
  For all of us, both sides of the aisle, both views--or many different 
views on abortion--this story ought to be heartbreaking. A couple who 
wants to have children and needs advice and counseling is denied it 
because of this policy.
  Another veteran I met, Lauren, was denied the lifesaving care she 
needed when experiencing a miscarriage under the VA's previous abortion 
ban before the administration stepped in to expand veterans' access to 
healthcare. She was denied care from a community care provider when 
having a miscarriage. She was eventually able to get that care 
elsewhere. She stressed the danger of being denied the lifesaving care 
at the moment she needed it from the VA.
  And in her own words:

       Unfortunately, this has been a reality for so many across 
     the country, but what's happened to me isn't isolated. As a 
     former combat medic, I hear from so many women veterans with 
     similar reproductive issues triggered during service, ranging 
     from a wide array of environmental and occupational factors 
     to include toxic exposure.

  And she said:

       I served our country and was promised comprehensive health 
     care for disabilities I

[[Page S1608]]

     incurred in service, which includes abortion care. Instead, 
     radical ideologies have infiltrated our clinics.

  Denying victims of rape or incest the essential care they need is an 
insult, but it is more than an insult. It is an injury to veterans who 
put their lives on the line to serve our great Nation, which has made a 
promise to them. It is a promise it makes to men, as well as women, 
that they will receive the healthcare they need from the VA. It is a 
promise that a great Nation cannot break.
  Today, we have the opportunity to right this heartbreaking wrong. We 
can overturn this cruel, misguided policy by passing our Congressional 
Review Act resolution.
  And to my Republican colleagues, let me just say: If you believe 
women veterans ought to be denied healthcare, if you believe we should 
break our promise to them, if you believe that this cruel, dangerous 
policy should be sustained, I understand you will vote against this.
  But I am hoping that you believe in protecting women veterans who 
have been raped or whose health is at risk, and the only way you can 
prove it is by supporting this resolution. Prove it today because these 
veterans deserve action, not just words or rhetoric or empty promises.
  Open your eyes to the horror of this policy as it affects individual 
women veterans who need this healthcare. Please join us in overturning 
this absolutely abhorrent policy.
  I am grateful to colleagues who have joined me on the floor today.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Hawaii.
  Ms. HIRONO. Mr. President, I would be happy to yield to my colleague 
from New Hampshire Mrs. Shaheen if she would like to go before me.
  Mrs. SHAHEEN. Go ahead.
  Ms. HIRONO. Mr. President, for 125 years, women have bravely served 
in our Armed Forces, risking their lives to defend our country and to 
protect our national security.
  Today, more than 2 million--2 million--women veterans live in the 
United States--women Trump has ignored. Basically, he has turned his 
back on them by denying them access to abortion care and counseling.
  Abortion care is critical care, often lifesaving healthcare, as noted 
by my colleague just now. That is why, after the Supreme Court's 
disastrous Dobbs decision, the VA responded by enabling women veterans 
to access abortion counseling and care.
  But last December, the VA, under different leadership and thinking 
they could get away with it, quietly implemented a near-total abortion 
ban at the VA even in cases of rape, incest, or when a pregnancy 
endangers the veteran's life. It is not an exaggeration to call this 
change in VA policy yet another front in Trump's war on women.
  Over 450,000 of the women veterans of reproductive age who receive VA 
care live in States with abortion bans or restrictions. Because of 
Trump's extreme policy, these women are now out of options and with 
nowhere to turn, in reality, for abortion care. These are veterans, as 
I mentioned, who bravely risk their lives for our country, who have the 
expectation that their country will take care of them when they return 
to civilian life--not so under this regime. Instead, the Agency tasked 
with ensuring the health of our veterans is willfully risking their 
health and lives all because of its ideological agenda.
  We owe it to our women veterans and all veterans to provide them with 
the healthcare they need and earn, not to mention deserve. That is why 
Senate Democrats have introduced legislation to overturn this life-
threatening policy at the VA and restore access to the care our 
veterans deserve.
  Tonight, every Senator will go on the record to make clear whether 
they care more about the well-being of our veterans or the political 
cruelty of Donald Trump. As the regime attempts to score cheap 
political points and place the lives of thousands of women at risk, I 
urge my colleagues to join in restoring access to essential healthcare 
for these veterans.
  I want to add to the examples provided by my colleague Senator 
Blumenthal. Our women veterans, in their service to our country, are 
exposed to toxic fumes and other environmental and surface conditions 
that require comprehensive healthcare. As I mentioned, they are exposed 
to conditions that maybe in the normal course, other women who are not 
in our services are exposed to. So our women veterans require 
comprehensive healthcare, and that is what we are asking for. Of 
course, that care includes abortion care.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Justice). The Senator from New Hampshire.
  Mrs. SHAHEEN. Mr. President, I thank my colleague from Hawaii both 
for her eloquent statements and for her willingness to let me go ahead 
of her. I appreciate that, but she was here first.
  I come to the floor today to join my colleagues Senator Blumenthal, 
Senator Hirono, and so many others in this caucus because after years 
of relentless attacks on reproductive freedoms nationwide, what we are 
seeing from our colleagues here in Congress and the Trump 
administration is that they have now set their sights on our Nation's 
veterans, those who have dedicated their lives in service to our 
country.
  The Trump administration's new policy that we are voting to overturn 
today isn't just extreme; it is flat-out dangerous. Republicans and 
Democrats alike have committed to doing everything we can to uphold the 
basic promises we have made to our Nation's veterans. So we have to 
ask: Why is this administration bending over backward to further erode 
the freedoms our veterans risk their lives to protect by ripping away 
the basic, essential healthcare that women need?
  After the Dobbs decision, the VA took a basic but critical step to 
protect the health of veterans and their families by providing them 
access to healthcare in a very specific set of circumstances--tragic 
instances like when our veterans have been victims of rape, when they 
have experienced incest, or when their lives or their health has been 
directly in danger--because when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. 
Wade and diminished the reproductive freedoms that women have enjoyed 
for half a century, it was clear that the Federal Government needed to 
take action to make it easier, not harder, for the hundreds of 
thousands of young women who have served our country to be able to 
access basic healthcare when they need it the most--veterans who have 
often waited until after their military service to start a family and 
now must question whether it is going to be safe for them to do so, 
veterans who are now facing the most restrictive abortion ban across 
the Federal Government.
  This policy doesn't just prevent those brave Americans from receiving 
care under dire and heartbreaking circumstances; it actually prevents 
them from receiving basic counseling about their health as well. As my 
colleagues have already pointed out, this ban on abortion counseling 
means that VA providers can't discuss pregnancy options with their 
patients.
  While the VA claims they will always save a veteran's life, their own 
internal guidance is so vague that providers will be forced to make 
impossible decisions. In this case, the lack of planning and 
specificity will leave it up to the VA to make split-second decisions 
about an urgent medical need based on very murky guidelines.
  At every turn, this administration has pushed forward dangerous 
policies intended to threaten access to full reproductive care. That is 
why I am calling on our colleagues across the aisle to show some common 
sense and to realize that we can't repay those veterans who have 
already sacrificed so much for their country with a policy that puts 
their lives in danger, particularly at a time when one in three of our 
Nation's female veterans has reported experiencing military sexual 
trauma over the course of their service.

  Let me repeat that because I think that is a staggering statistic. 
One in three of our Nation's female veterans has reported experiencing 
military sexual trauma during their service.
  These brave women deserve better than the carelessness of this 
administration refusing to give them full access to reproductive health 
care. We can't sit back and abandon them when they need it the most. We 
can't sit back and watch as reproductive freedoms slip away because 
access to necessary, lifesaving reproductive care should not be left to 
chance or the

[[Page S1609]]

split-second decision of a provider. It should be a fundamental right, 
especially in the United States of America, where we have a 
Constitution that says that all people are created equal. Now, I know 
it says ``all men are created equal,'' but I think, since the founding 
of this country, that has been expanded to the understanding that we 
are talking about all of the citizens of this country.
  With that, I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. BLUMENTHAL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. BLUMENTHAL. Mr. President, in just minutes, we will vote on 
Calendar No. 338, S.J. Res. 103, which will reverse the indecent, 
unjust policy that this administration implemented secretively on New 
Year's Eve.
  I ask my colleagues to keep in their minds and thoughts and hearts 
the women veterans who have devoted so much to this country and who 
continue to serve and sacrifice as we speak.
  I ask them to keep in mind the female service officer who was raped 
before transitioning out of the military service and who learned she 
was pregnant after enrolling in the VA's healthcare system. She is no 
longer covered by the VA to have an abortion. If she were still on 
Active Duty, the Department of Defense would pay for or perform the 
abortion. If she worked for the VA, her Federal employee healthcare 
insurance would pay for the abortion. If she were someone serving in a 
Federal prison, her abortion would be covered. But because she is an 
enrollee in the VA's healthcare system after bravely serving this 
country, she is not even covered for an abortion resulting from rape or 
if her health is at risk.
  That is not right. That is not just. That is not worthy of a great 
country. It is not matching her service with our staying faithful to 
her.
  So for all these reasons, advocates of women's healthcare, advocates 
of veterans, and people who simply support healthcare as a human right 
support this resolution to do the right thing.

                          ____________________