[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H2661-H2662]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SUPERSONIC AVIATION MODERNIZATION ACT
Mr. TAYLOR. Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 3410) to allow for the operation of civil supersonic flight
in the national airspace system under certain conditions, and for other
purposes, as amended.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 3410
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Supersonic Aviation
Modernization Act''.
SEC. 2. ALLOWING FOR THE OPERATION OF CIVIL SUPERSONIC
FLIGHT.
(a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this section, the Administrator of the Federal
Aviation Administration shall issue or revise such
regulations, such as section 91.817 of part 14, Code of
Federal Regulations, as are necessary to allow for the
operation of civil aircraft (as defined in section 40102(16)
of title 49, United States Code) without special
authorization within the national airspace system at a Mach
number greater than 1 so long as the aircraft is operated in
such a manner that no sonic boom reaches the ground in the
United States.
(b) Compliance With Noise Standards.--Not later than April
1, 2027, the Administrator shall issue a final rule
establishing noise standards under part 36 of title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations, requiring civil aircraft granted
authority to operate pursuant to subsection (a) not to exceed
the most recent takeoff and landing noise levels required for
subsonic aircraft currently in operation on the date of
enactment.
(c) Periodic Review.--In issuing the final rule issued
under subsection (b), the Administrator shall further specify
a process for periodic review and update of the rule to
reflect future advances in aircraft noise reduction
technology and relevant regulatory changes, as determined by
the Administrator.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Ohio (Mr. Taylor) and the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Figures) each
will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Ohio.
General Leave
Mr. TAYLOR. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks
and include extraneous material into the Record on H.R. 3410.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Ohio?
There was no objection.
Mr. TAYLOR. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Madam Speaker, H.R. 3410, the Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act,
or the SAM Act, lays the preliminary framework for a return to civil
supersonic aircraft operations in the United States.
The SAM Act directs the administrator of the Federal Aviation
Administration to issue or revise current regulations that are outdated
and, in some cases, to create an artificial speed limit that hampers
American innovation.
Despite these restrictions, engine technology has continued to mature
and successfully demonstrate that it is feasible to conduct supersonic
operations in the National Airspace System
[[Page H2662]]
without generating a sonic boom that reaches the ground.
Furthermore, the SAM Act builds on key work done in the FAA
Reauthorization Act of 2024 to usher in a new age of American
innovation in the skies.
President Trump's executive order titled: ``Leading the World in
Supersonic Flight'' documented the importance of American leadership in
this reemerging sector of aviation.
To that end, the time is now. Let's come together and support
American business and innovation.
Madam Speaker, I urge support for this legislation, and I reserve the
balance of my time.
Mr. FIGURES. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Madam Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 3410, the Supersonic
Aviation Modernization Act, as amended, bipartisan legislation
introduced by Representative Nehls and Representative Davids.
One of the priorities of the Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee, which I have the privilege of sitting on with my colleague
from Ohio, Representative Taylor, is to look for new ways to help our
constituents have a better flying experience.
Supersonic flight is poised to be another paradigm shift in the
aviation industry, especially if it can be done in ways that maintain
safety and limit noise and sonic booms.
However, currently supersonic aircraft are prohibited from operating
in the U.S. without a special authorization from the FAA.
H.R. 3410, as amended, is the first step to eventually allowing
Americans to safely travel across the country at almost half the time
it takes now, providing more time for being productive or spending the
time with family and not on a plane.
The bill would require the FAA to revise current regulations to
ensure supersonic aircraft could fly in the U.S. as long as these
operations do not create a supersonic boom that reaches the ground.
It would also help ensure these aircraft would not create noise
levels any higher than traditional aircraft that are currently in
operation.
This bipartisan bill also calls for future updates to the standard by
the FAA to ensure supersonic aircraft become even quieter in the
future.
Furthermore, the bill ensures that these noise standards are
periodically reviewed and further updated to reflect the latest
advances in aircraft technology.
While Congress and the FAA should continue working to make supersonic
flight more sustainable, I am greatly encouraged that the industry
stakeholders are designing their supersonic aircraft to fly completely
on sustainable aviation fuel.
The potential benefits to consumers are promising: less time on the
aircraft and more time building that new business or spending time with
friends and family.
Madam Speaker, I thank the Aviation Subcommittee Chairman Nehls and
Representative Davids from Kansas for their leadership on this
legislation. I support this legislation and urge my colleagues to do
the same.
Madam Speaker, in closing we should have been here a long time ago in
terms of being able to build on the supersonic technology that has been
out for years. It has been over two decades now since a supersonic
aircraft has been used in a commercial context, and we have the
technological advances to be able to do so and do so safely and
efficiently.
This legislation is common sense. It pushes back or guards against
the things that had the most worries in previous iterations of this
type of technology, particularly sonic booms reaching the ground and
noise levels.
The flying public deserves a better flying experience, and this bill
is a step in the right direction of being able to provide that. That is
why I support it, and I urge my colleagues to do the same.
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. TAYLOR. Madam Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, in closing, I thank Aviation Subcommittee Chairman
Representative Nehls for his leadership on this issue.
A return of civil supersonic operations within the National Airspace
System will reimagine how Americans travel and commute, opening new
possibilities for people and commerce to traverse this great Nation.
Think of the possibilities: DC to Los Angeles in just 2 hours. While
this may seem far-fetched, it is closer to reality than many would
believe. In fact, several U.S. airlines already have preorders of
supersonic jets.
To reiterate, the SAM Act will revise current outdated regulations
and place the United States in a prime position to be the global leader
in civil supersonic technologies.
Madam Speaker, I urge support of this bill, and I yield back the
balance of my time.
Mr. NEHLS. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of H.R. 3410, the
Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act, which will help unlock the next
era of American aviation innovation.
My bill directs the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to update
its regulations to allow civil supersonic flight within the National
Airspace System, provided that no audible sonic boom reaches the
ground. It is a balanced, commonsense approach that prioritizes both
technological advancement and the protection of communities on the
ground.
Current FAA restrictions, which have remained unchanged since 1973,
broadly prohibit commercial supersonic flight over land without special
authorization. While these rules were appropriate for their time, they
no longer reflect the state of modern aerospace technology.
Today, advancements in engine design, aerodynamics, and materials
have made it possible to achieve speeds above Mach I without generating
audible sonic booms at ground level. American companies are already
demonstrating that quieter supersonic flight is not only feasible, but
safe and reliable.
It is essential that the FAA modernize its regulatory framework to
reflect these technological realities. By establishing clear, science
and evidence-based standards, we can provide certainty to innovations
while ensuring the highest safety standards.
This legislation also reinforces key provisions outlined in President
Trump's executive order aimed at ensuring U.S. leadership in civil
supersonic aviation, making clear that outdated regulations should not
stand in the way of American ingenuity.
H.R. 3410 represents an opportunity for the United States to reclaim
and strengthen its leadership in global aviation. By embracing
innovation while maintaining rigorous safety and noise standards, we
can accelerate the development of future-generation air travel, create
high-skilled jobs, and ensure that American companies, not foreign
competitors, set the pace for the future of flight.
I urge my colleagues to support this legislation and help usher in a
new era of quiet, efficient, and transformative supersonic travel.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Cammack). The question is on the motion
offered by the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Taylor) that the House suspend
the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 3410, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________