[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2026)]
[House]
[Pages H2650-H2651]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                        SMART SPACE ACT OF 2026

  Mr. TAYLOR. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 7388) to direct the Administrator of General Services to 
convene consultation meetings to identify alternative financing 
solutions for the construction of new public buildings that will reduce 
costs to the Federal Government, and for other purposes, as amended.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 7388

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Smart Space Act of 2026''.

     SEC. 2. PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS.

       (a) Meetings and Consultations.--Not later than 90 days 
     after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 
     General Services shall convene consultation meetings to 
     identify alternative financing solutions for the construction 
     or renovation of public buildings, or necessary work to 
     prepare such buildings for disposal that will reduce costs to 
     the Federal Government.
       (b) Meetings.--In convening consultation meetings under 
     subsection (a), the Administrator shall include--
       (1) experts related to private commercial real estate;
       (2) experts related to Federal real estate; and
       (3) if available, State, including the District of 
     Columbia, real estate experts experienced with leveraging 
     private financing for public buildings and facilities.
       (c) Report and Recommendations.--Not later than 120 days 
     after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator 
     shall submit to the President--
       (1) recommendations on types of public-private partnerships 
     and alternative financing methods best suited for meeting the 
     public building needs of the Federal Government; and
       (2) a list of recommended projects related to public 
     buildings for which such methods should be used with details 
     on which methods and types of public-private partnerships are 
     recommended for each project.
       (d) Recommended Project List.--In submitting a list of 
     recommended projects under subsection (c)(2), the 
     Administrator shall submit projects that the Administrator 
     determines--
       (1) serve core missions of the Federal Government for which 
     maintaining the functions in federally owned space over the 
     long-term is critical;
       (2) will result in either consolidations or relocations of 
     Federal departments or agencies out of costly, inefficient, 
     and underutilized space that the Administrator intends to 
     sell or dispose of once vacated; and
       (3) with respect to standard office space, will result in 
     meeting a minimum building utilization of 60 percent or 
     greater as defined in section 2302 of the Thomas R. Carper 
     Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (40 U.S.C. 584 note).
       (e) Transparency.--
       (1) Report.--The Administrator shall submit the report 
     under subsection (c) to the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure in the House and the Committee on Environment 
     and Public Works in the Senate and make such report publicly 
     available on the website of the General Services 
     Administration.
       (2) Timeline.--The Administrator of General Services shall 
     maintain on the website of the General Services 
     Administration information on the process under this Act, 
     including any timelines and milestones.
       (3) Delays.--The Administrator shall report directly to the 
     President and Congress any delays with respect to the timing 
     and milestones described in paragraph (2).
       (4) Meetings.--Meetings pursuant to subsection (a) shall be 
     noticed and open to the public and shall not be subject to 
     chapter 10 of title 5, United States Code.
       (f) Definitions.--In this Act:
       (1) Alternative financing; public-private partnership.--The 
     terms ``alternative financing'' and ``public-private 
     partnership'' may include--
       (A) agreements that reflect an obligation by a non-Federal 
     entity to design, build, finance, operate, and maintain an 
     asset, or a combination thereof; and
       (B) a ground-lease to a non-Federal party with a subsequent 
     lease back of the improvements.
       (2) Public building.--The term ``public building'' has the 
     meaning given such term in section 3301 of title 40, United 
     States Code.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Ohio (Mr. Taylor) and the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Stanton) each 
will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Ohio.


                             General Leave

  Mr. TAYLOR. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that Members have 5 
legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and insert 
extraneous material into the Record on H.R. 7388, as amended.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Ohio?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. TAYLOR. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, H.R. 7388, the Smart Space Act of 2026, directs the 
Administrator of General Services to consult with real estate experts 
on how alternative financing and public-private partnerships can be 
used for public building projects to reduce costs to the taxpayer.
  Last year, the Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 
2024 was signed into law. That legislation included significant public 
buildings reforms that have the potential to save billions of dollars 
for taxpayers.
  As the GSA and other executive agencies have implemented these 
reforms to reduce costly space, a key challenge agencies have faced is 
funding activities that may be needed before buildings can be sold and 
agencies relocated to less expensive space.
  In addition, recent hearings held by the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure, as well as reports by the Government Accountability 
Office and the Public Buildings Reform Board, have revealed billions of 
dollars in liabilities associated with our owned real estate assets due 
to deferred maintenance accumulated over the years.
  We need to identify new funding solutions to these problems that 
don't rely on increasing taxpayer dollars for the space consolidation 
efforts.
  The Smart Space Act of 2026 directs the GSA, in consultation with 
real estate experts, to recommend alternative financing solutions and 
provide a list of projects for which those solutions would make sense. 
This will provide the President and Congress with information on viable 
options to address the challenge of acquiring the capital needed to 
prepare buildings for sale and reduce the liability to the taxpayer.
  Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Burlison) for 
his leadership on this important issue. I urge support of this 
legislation, and I reserve the balance of my time.

                              {time}  1550

  Mr. STANTON. I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 7388, the Smart Space Act, as 
amended.
  The General Services Administration's portfolio of owned buildings 
are now, on average, over 52 years old, and many of the buildings have 
not undergone any significant modernizations since they were 
constructed.
  In 2025, the GAO reported that GSA has a $6.1 billion deferred 
maintenance and repair backlog.
  In 2026, the Public Buildings Reform Board reported that GSA's 
backlog was approximately $50 billion. Whether the cost to repair GSA's 
buildings is $6.1 billion or $50 billion, GSA does not currently have 
the funding. The Smart Space Act is intended to address this

[[Page H2651]]

funding shortfall by directing GSA to identify alternative financing 
solutions for the construction, renovation, or, when necessary, 
disposal of public buildings.
  GSA already uses alternative financing in the form of public-private 
partnerships, or ``P3s,'' to procure energy savings and facility 
improvements with no upfront capital costs or appropriations from 
Congress.
  When used appropriately and when both partners are held accountable, 
public-private partnership can help deliver high-cost, technically 
complex projects more quickly, leverage private-sector resources and 
expertise, and reduce construction and operational risks for the 
Federal Government.
  H.R. 7388, as amended, directs GSA to convene consultation meetings 
with real estate experts to identify alternative financing solutions 
for the construction or renovation of public buildings. Learning from 
experts is always a good thing.
  Mr. Speaker, I support this bill and urge my colleagues to do the 
same.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. TAYLOR. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Missouri (Mr. Burlison), the author of this legislation.
  Mr. BURLISON. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise today to support my bill, the Smart Space Act of 
2026, legislation that modernizes how the Federal Government manages 
its real estate portfolio.
  Today, the Federal Government holds billions of dollars in 
underutilized and outdated Federal buildings, while hardworking 
American taxpayers are left to cover the costs of their repair, upkeep, 
and maintenance.
  If Congress is serious about being responsible stewards of taxpayer 
dollars, then Congress must also be serious about how the Federal 
Government manages its real estate.
  This is exactly what the Smart Space Act is designed to do.
  The Smart Space Act requires the General Services Administration to 
convene real estate experts to identify alternative financing solutions 
for acquisition of or disposal of Federal properties through leveraging 
public-private partnership.
  These partnerships have been used successfully by both the private 
sector and State governments for years to modernize infrastructure 
while keeping costs at bay.
  Public-private partnerships are proven to lower long-run costs, 
minimize taxpayer exposure, and deliver reliable infrastructure more 
efficiently than traditional Federal procurement methods.
  Importantly, this legislation does not mandate any new construction 
or spend a single taxpayer dollar. Instead, it creates a framework for 
disciplined decisionmaking while retaining full congressional and 
Presidential oversight.
  It also encourages the Federal Government to engage in public-private 
partnerships, which is both a practical and responsible step toward 
modernizing our Federal infrastructure while ensuring fiscal 
discipline.
  The Smart Space Act is about doing more with less, respecting the 
taxpayer, and bringing common sense to how the Federal Government 
finances its core assets.
  Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairman Graves for his leadership and 
commitment to advancing this legislation, and I urge my colleagues to 
support this legislation.
  Mr. STANTON. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Speaker, I support H.R. 7388, the Smart Space Act, as amended, 
and urge my colleagues to do the same.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. TAYLOR. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Speaker, in closing, this legislation will help identify 
alternative financing solutions for real estate projects, thereby 
reducing costs and liabilities to taxpayers.
  H.R. 7388 is a commonsense solution that ensures agencies can 
continue to responsibly reduce the Federal real estate portfolio.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge support of H.R. 7388, and I yield back the 
balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Taylor) that the House suspend the rules and 
pass the bill, H.R. 7388, as amended.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________