[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S855-S860]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          LEGISLATIVE SESSION

                                 ______
                                 

                    HOUSING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ACT

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will 
resume consideration of H.R. 6644, which the clerk will report.
  The senior assistant bill clerk read as follows:

       A bill (H.R. 6644) to increase the supply of housing in 
     America, and for other purposes.

  Pending:


 =========================== NOTE =========================== 

  
  On page S855, March 5, 2026, in the second column, the following 
appears: A bill (H.R. 6644) to increase the supply of housing in 
America, and for other purposes. Scott (SC)/Warren) Amendment No. 
4308, in the nature of a substitute. Pending:
  
  The online Record has been corrected to read: A bill (H.R. 6644) 
to increase the supply of housing in America, and for other 
purposes. Pending:


 ========================= END NOTE ========================= 


  Scott (SC)/Warren Amendment No. 4308, in the nature of a substitute.
  Thune (for Scott (SC)/Warren) Amendment No. 4307 (to Amendment No. 
4308), to require the Comptroller General of the United States to 
submit to Congress studies on workforce housing, housing for persons 
who are elderly or disabled, proximity of housing to Superfund sites, 
and residential heirs property.
  Thune Amendment No. 4310 (to Amendment No. 4307), to change the 
enactment date.
  Thune Amendment No. 4311 (to the text proposed to be stricken by 
Amendment No. 4308), to change the enactment date.
  Thune Amendment No. 4312 (to Amendment No. 4311), of a perfecting 
nature.
  Thune motion to commit the bill to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
and Urban Affairs, with instructions, Amendment No. 4313, to change the 
enactment date.
  Thune Amendment No. 4314 (to the instructions of the motion to 
commit), of a perfecting nature.
  Thune Amendment No. 4315 (to Amendment No. 4314), of a perfecting 
nature.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.


                     Honoring Army Reserve Soldiers

  Mr. GRASSLEY. Last night, we received the sad news that two more Army 
Reserve soldiers from the 103rd Sustainment Command, based out of Des 
Moines, IA, were killed in Kuwait amid Operation Epic Fury. That 
includes MAJ Jeffrey O'Brien, who is from Indianola, and he has family 
in Waukee, IA.
  Their heroism should be remembered forever. These soldiers represent 
the best of Iowa and the best of the United States. We should never 
forget their sacrifice and their service. Barbara and I are praying for 
their loved ones in this time of grief, and we also pray for the safety 
of all soldiers serving in harm's way.


                               H.R. 6644

  Mr. President, on another matter, before the U.S. Senate now is what 
we call a housing bill.
  Every year, as I travel to all of Iowa's 99 counties, I do that to 
connect with constituents and to understand Iowans' needs of their 
various communities across our State. Whether the community I visit is 
large, small, or rural, all regularly express concerns with the lack of 
affordable housing. So you can understand why I am excited that the 
Senate, after a long period of time, is finally working to pass the 
21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.
  I want to emphasize that this is the most significant housing package 
to be considered by Congress in decades. This bipartisan bill includes 
a wide range of proposals focused on increasing housing supply by 
cutting redtape and unlocking private capital. It updates Federal 
housing laws and empowers communities to address local housing needs. 
Most importantly, it includes--this is most important because Iowa is a 
rural State--the bill includes key reforms to the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture's rural housing service programs that will preserve and 
expand affordable housing operations in Iowa's rural communities and 
throughout rural United States.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.

[[Page S856]]

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                   Recognition of the Majority Leader

  The majority leader is recognized.


                       Tribute to Claudia Kostel

  Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, before I begin today, I would like to take 
a moment to honor Claudia Kostel, the Senate's chief counsel for 
employment, who is retiring this month after serving this institution 
for more than 25 years.
  Senators may get the limelight, but we wouldn't last a day without 
our staffs, and they also wouldn't last a day without the many 
institutional staff who keep the Senate functioning--people like 
Claudia.
  For more than 25 years, Claudia has provided Senators and staff alike 
with counsel on employment and labor law. She is known for providing 
scrupulously nonpartisan, high-quality legal advice and for maintaining 
the highest standards for her own work and that of her office.
  She is also known as a mentor to--and an advocate for--her employees 
and is the kind of leader who, in the words of one staffer, ``never 
asks others to do what she is not willing to do.''
  And in addition to providing the highest quality legal advice, she 
also keeps writing standards high, with one coworker noting:

       She never met a draft she couldn't make tighter or a brief 
     she couldn't shorten.

  As I said, Claudia has served the Senate for more than 25 years. Only 
the second chief counsel for employment in the Senate's history, she 
served under seven Secretaries of the Senate and has been witness to a 
lot of history. It is hard to overstate the value of that.
  She doesn't just bring legal acumen and a commitment to excellence; 
she also brings a tremendous amount of institutional memory and 
institutional knowledge. We are lucky to have public servants like her 
who are willing to dedicate so much of their working life to this 
institution.
  Claudia, my warmest congratulations on your retirement, and thank you 
for your service.


                    Department of Homeland Security

  Mr. President, it is another Thursday here in the Senate, and it 
should be just another payday for employees at the Department of 
Homeland Security, but thanks to Democrats' shutdown, a lot of DHS 
employees are only receiving a partial paycheck today. Democrats will 
have an opportunity to fix that this afternoon.
  Republicans will again try to pass legislation to fund DHS so 
employees can get paid and DHS can operate at full capacity, but I 
suspect Democrats will once again oppose this commonsense measure. And 
having kept DHS shut down now for 3 weeks and counting, Democrats will 
once again leave Washington today and head to the airport, where they 
will walk past some of the 50,000 TSA agents who are missing part of 
their pay because of Senate Democrats.
  One TSA agent told CNN recently, ``You're going to see TSA officers 
in the food bank lines in a couple of days,'' and he noted that several 
of his colleagues have taken out payday loans.
  And it is not just the TSA. Civilian Coast Guard employees, FEMA 
employees, cyber security professionals, and others are missing pay 
because of Democrats' shutdown.
  Like Democrats' first shutdown, a few months ago, this shutdown is 
causing a lot of financial stress, uncertainty, and pain for hard-
working Americans. It is also making it harder for those working to 
keep America safe.
  Right now, less than half of the Americans who work for the 
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency are on the job. Think 
about that. The rest have been furloughed, and the Agency has had to 
cancel vulnerability checks on certain infrastructure.
  Now, you would think that that might raise some concern among 
Democrats, especially given the current threat environment, but, 
apparently, it doesn't.
  The FEMA GO system, which is how State and local governments and 
other grantees access funding that they have been awarded, is offline. 
So grantees can't access the funds that they need for critical programs 
in their communities.
  Officials report that the Disaster Relief Fund is being ``rapidly 
depleted,'' which jeopardizes our ability to support disaster recovery 
efforts and respond to future emergencies. And a number of American 
cities that are hosting World Cup games, in a few months, are concerned 
about funding for security preparations being frozen due to Democrats' 
shutdown.
  This is the second time in 6 months that Democrats have subjected 
thousands of workers to the pain and uncertainty of a government 
shutdown, and like their record-setting 43-day shutdown in the fall, 
this DHS shutdown is entirely unnecessary.
  Just to review, we had a bipartisan agreement in January that 
included deescalation training for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 
as well as $20 million for body cameras for ICE officers. When 
Democrats decided that wasn't enough, Republicans and the White House 
agreed to reopen negotiations. We understood that negotiations take 
time, and we wanted to ensure that Federal employees would not be 
impacted by this ongoing work. So we suggested a temporary funding 
extension for several weeks to allow the negotiations to continue. 
Democrats insisted on no more than 2--2--weeks, and when those 2 weeks 
came and went without an agreement, we tried to get another temporary 
extension through. Again, Democrats blocked it.
  Here we are, 3 weeks later, and Democrats, apparently, don't care 
that a whole lot of Federal employees are working without pay--Federal 
employees, I might add, who have nothing to do--nothing to do--with 
immigration enforcement--FEMA, TSA, cyber security offices.
  Let's be clear. This is not some principled stand by Democrats in the 
face of a refusal to negotiate--not at all. Republicans are at the 
table and have been now for weeks. The White House sent a very serious 
offer to Democrats almost a week ago. It is Democrats who don't seem to 
be interested in reaching an agreement.
  In fact, from where I stand, it is looking a lot like Democrats just 
want to keep this alive as a political issue. If Democrats were really 
interested in putting reforms in place, they would be doing everything 
they can to get a bill, but they are not. They are interested in 
politics, not policy.
  And if public safety ends up suffering as a result of their decision 
to shut down the Department of Homeland Security, if hard-working 
Americans have to go without paychecks, well, apparently, that is just 
fine with Senate Democrats.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                   Recognition of the Minority Leader

  The Democratic leader is recognized.


                               Food Costs

  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I just came back from an event at the 
National Press Club, hosted by the American Economic Liberties Project, 
on the plague of high food costs that are maddening to so many 
Americans. People are fed up.
  Donald Trump promised to bring food costs down, and instead, they 
have gone up.
  Last month, the Secretary of Agriculture said:

       It can cost around $3 a meal for a piece of chicken, a 
     piece of broccoli, a corn tortilla, and one other thing.

  This is nonsense. So this morning, as part of Democrats' lowering 
costs agenda, I was proud to join my colleagues to introduce the Family 
Grocery and Farmer Relief Act.
  There are many reasons why food costs have risen, including Trump's 
tariffs, including supply chain problems, but there is a deeper 
structural problem under the surface too--monopoly power.

[[Page S857]]

  A handful of powerful corporations have turned food and farming into 
a rigged game. Today, only four companies control 85 percent of the 
market for beef, 67 percent of the market for pork, and 60 percent of 
the market for poultry. When so much market power is concentrated 
within so few corporations, Americans at the grocery store see prices 
go up while farmers see their profits go down, and corporate players 
have free reign to rig the system.
  Today, a pound of ground beef is more expensive than ever at $7 a 
pound. The price of beef in general has risen 16 percent in just a 
year, to $6 a pound. This is not sustainable.
  So my bill rests on a simple idea: To lower costs, we need more 
competition, and to create more competition, we have to break the 
stranglehold of these monopoly corporations. We have done it before; we 
can do it again. Fighting monopoly power is a tried-and-true tradition 
in the American ethos of progress.
  Over 120 years ago, Upton Sinclair published ``The Jungle,'' and it 
opened the eyes of the Nation to working conditions in meatpacking 
plants and to the awful monopoly powers that dominated the industry.
  Soon after, the FTC was created--the Federal Trade Commission--to 
investigate monopolies and anti-competitive behavior that raised prices 
and made it harder for small and medium businesses to compete and 
thrive.
  A few years after that, the Congress responded to these findings by 
passing the Packers and Stockyards Act, which curbed the power of the 
meatpacking giants and gave the Federal Government tools to restore 
competition and protect producers.
  Well, history is repeating itself. Those monopolies are dominating 
the food industry--and particularly the meat industry--as they did 120 
years ago, and we should follow the path that occurred back then when 
we curbed the power of monopolies. We have to do the same in our day 
and age, and history gives us a great example.
  Americans love the free market and open competition, but they don't 
love it when just one or two companies can dominate an industry and 
make fair competition impossible. That is not American. That is not a 
free market. That is how costs go up for something as basic as a pound 
of ground beef.
  Our bill will break the monopoly power that has played a sinister 
role in raising the prices of beef and groceries, and I thank my 
colleagues who have joined in this legislation.


                    Additional Cosponsors to S. 4007

  I will ask unanimous consent to add the list of cosponsors. It keeps 
growing.
  There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in 
the Record, as follows:

       Joining Leader Schumer are the following members:
       Cosponsors: Booker, Welch, Warren, Sanders, Gallego, 
     Merkley, Schatz, Durbin, Markey, Kim, Murphy, and Whitehouse.


                             Tariff Refunds

  Mr. SCHUMER. Now on tariff refunds, yesterday, a Federal judge sent 
the Trump administration a very clear message: Mr. President, refund 
the tariffs.
  In the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling invalidating a large 
portion of the President's tariffs, the U.S. Court of International 
Trade in New York said yesterday that importers are entitled to 
refunds. But let's be very clear: The people who deserve a refund from 
Donald Trump's trade war are American households and small businesses, 
not large corporations.
  When the tariffs hit, large companies often passed the buck over to 
their customers. They are the ones--the customers are the ones who are 
owed the refund. So today, Senator Wyden and I are calling on the U.S. 
Chamber of Commerce to tell their members to pass savings of any tariff 
refunds to American consumers. If any refunds happen, large companies 
should not keep them but, rather, pass them back to consumers.
  It is simple fairness that the financial burden borne by small 
businesses and working people should not become a windfall for large 
corporations' balance sheets. American consumers and small businesses 
didn't choose this trade war and therefore should not have to pay for 
this trade war. They are owed a refund. They need to be made whole.
  I am glad that some companies have already announced they will pass 
refunds over to customers, and I urge the Chamber of Commerce to push 
more of their members to do the same.


                                  Iran

  Mr. President, finally, on Iran, yesterday was a disappointing and 
low moment for the U.S. Senate. With war in the Middle East escalating 
by the day, Senate Republicans chose to get behind Trump's military 
escapades despite overwhelming opposition from the American people. 
Shameful. Americans don't want war--not Republican voters, not 
Independents, not even many of Donald Trump's MAGA base. They feel 
betrayed by what is happening in the Middle East, and they feel 
betrayed by the Senators in this Chamber who refuse to stand up for the 
Constitution and refuse to put a check on Donald Trump's belligerence.
  The war is widening. There was fighting as far south as the Indian 
Ocean and drone attacks, perhaps as far north as Azerbaijan. Meanwhile, 
there is no strategy. Donald Trump's story and rationales keep changing 
by the day.
  If you listen to Pete Hegseth, to Marco Rubio, to Donald Trump, it is 
very, very obvious they are making it up as they go along, and 
Americans are worried. Gas prices are starting to go up. The national 
average is now $3.25 a gallon, up from $2.99 from a week ago.
  There is a story in POLITICO from this morning that Susie Wiles, 
Donald Trump's Chief of Staff, is ``[sounding] the alarm on gas 
prices.'' Apparently, the White House is scrambling to find something 
positive to say about gas prices to change the narrative of high costs. 
Here is an idea: If Donald Trump doesn't want gas prices to go up, he 
should not have unilaterally started a war with Iran. It is yet another 
sign that this administration seems allergic to having a plan and 
thinking about the consequences in advance.
  So shame--shame on Senate Republicans for not standing up to Donald 
Trump and his unpopular war. Senate Republicans had their chance to do 
something that would have been overwhelmingly popular--to say no to 
Trump's war. Instead, they enthusiastically said yes, and now they own 
this war with Iran just as much as Donald Trump does.


                       Tribute to Claudia Kostel

  Mr. President, finally, a farewell. Today, the Senate bids farewell 
and offers our deep thanks to Claudia Kostel, who leads the Office of 
the Senate Chief Counsel for Employment and who has served this 
institution with distinction since 2000. After more than 26 years, 
Claudia will be moving on to her next adventure. The Senate is lucky to 
have had someone of her caliber for so long.
  Claudia earned her law degree from the College of William & Mary. She 
has briefed cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and before the Third, 
Tenth, and DC Circuits.

  In the Senate, Claudia is only the second person ever to have served 
as chief counsel for employment. In that role, she has provided 
exceptional legal advice and counsel to Senate offices and to Senate 
employees. She has served with excellence, fairness, and an unwavering 
commitment to this institution.
  We hope this next chapter affords Claudia perhaps a little more 
time--time to ride her bike along the Mount Vernon Trail, time to put 
her legendary baking skills to even greater use, and most importantly, 
time with her family.
  Claudia, thank you for your service to the Senate. We wish you the 
very best.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                    Department of Homeland Security

  Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I come to the floor today having just 
listened to the minority leader talk about a number of topics. What he 
didn't talk about is the fact that his party has shut down the 
Department of Homeland Security.
  There is a poll that is out by Gallup, and it says: What is very 
important in terms of U.S. foreign policy goals? And

[[Page S858]]

the No. 1 thing is to prevent future acts of international terrorism.
  Well, how do we prevent it? Who is it in this country that counters 
the terrorism? It is the Department of Homeland Security, which the 
Democrats--and they are going to have to vote again today--are likely, 
as they have announced, to vote to keep it shut down. That is a 
betrayal of the American people.
  He used the word ``betrayal.'' To me, that is where it fits--with 
what actions the Democrats are likely to take today.
  What is the No. 2 very important purpose of U.S. foreign policy as a 
goal from the Gallup poll of the American people? No. 2 is preventing 
the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
  So what did we hear the minority leader talk about? His opposition to 
the efforts to show peace through strength and undermine the ability of 
Iran to develop and use and deploy nuclear weapons. Once again, a 
betrayal by the Democrats of the American people.
  Today, the Senate is going to vote on a bill to fund the Department 
of Homeland Security. This vital Department needs to be funded 
immediately. The Democrats have been blocking it for weeks. Protecting 
the American people is not optional. It is the first duty of 
government. For 3 weeks, the Democrats have held hostage the Department 
of Homeland Security. The Presiding Officer knows the reason. It is 
because the Democrats in this body and across the Capitol Building in 
the House of Representatives prioritize illegal immigrant criminals 
over American citizens, and they have done it repeatedly through their 
votes and their actions. Democrats have shut down the Department of 
Homeland Security because they want to end enforcement of our 
immigration laws and end immigration enforcement in America. They have 
been very clear about that. They refuse to fund the Department of 
Homeland Security because they want to turn America into a sanctuary 
country. That is where they are.
  Those in this Chamber would rather oppose President Trump than 
protect the American people, and they have repeatedly shown it. Let me 
say it again: Senate Democrats would rather oppose President Trump than 
protect the American people. This shutdown is a cheap publicity stunt. 
They are doing it for the radical left, and it is, at the same time, a 
costly danger for our country and our citizens.
  Now that America has struck Iran, the No. 1 threat to our homeland is 
the threat of terrorism. Last week, in Austin, TX, a lone-wolf 
terrorist opened fire in a crowded establishment, killing three 
Americans and wounding over a dozen more. The shooter was wearing a T-
shirt. The T-shirt bore an Iranian flag, and it was under a sweatshirt 
that said ``Property of Allah.''
  The warning lights are flashing red. Look, we know that Iran exports 
its terror abroad. They have been doing it for the last 10 years with 
the $56 billion that Barack Obama and the Democrats gave to the 
Ayatollah 10 years ago.
  For 4 years, Joe Biden and the Democrats opened the border, and we 
don't know who is in our country today. When Joe Biden was in office, 
1,500 illegal immigrants from Iran were arrested at the southern 
border. Do you know what the Democrats then did? They released half of 
them into the United States. This was what was known as the Democrats' 
catch-and-release program. Who are they? Where are they? What are they 
doing today? No one knows. And these are just the people that we know 
about that were released into the country. Think about the thousands 
and thousands of ``got-aways'' during the time Joe Biden was President 
of the United States. They are in communities in all 50 States. Iran's 
tentacles stretch all the way to small communities in our Nation.

  Now, the Department of Homeland Security is warning law enforcement 
nationwide about the elevated risk and threat from lone-wolf attacks 
like we saw in Texas last weekend, and yet at this very moment today, 
Democrats in this Chamber are continuing to block the funding for the 
very Agency that is tasked with stopping these terrorist attacks.
  Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, said funding for 
the Department of Homeland Security is--his word--``ridiculous.'' That 
is the way the Democrats perceive this. I will tell you what is 
ridiculous. What is ridiculous is to shut down the Agency responsible 
for finding the terrorists in this country and stopping them before 
they act. That is what we are dealing with. It is ridiculous to refuse 
to pay the men and women who protect our homeland. That is what the 
Democrats are doing. It is ridiculous to cripple our cyber defense. 
That is what the Democrats are doing and continue to do.
  The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which is part 
of the Department of Homeland Security--they protect our Nation's 
critical infrastructure, including our energy infrastructure. Chuck 
Schumer was on the floor talking about energy. Why isn't he protecting 
our energy infrastructure in this country? Why is he continuing to make 
it vulnerable to attacks? It is awful what they are doing. Today, only 
800 of over 2,000 employees are on the job in this Department, and they 
are working without pay. The others have been furloughed due to the 
Democrat shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security. And because 
of this shutdown, the Agency has canceled both physical and cyber 
security assessments to detect vulnerabilities within our system.
  No wonder we are on high alert. We need to be on high alert because 
of the Democrats who have put us there. This is a direct threat to our 
Nation's security. Shutting down the Department of Homeland Security, 
as Democrats in this Chamber have done repeatedly, makes our country 
less safe and makes our citizens more vulnerable. But I expect to see, 
when the Democrats come in, them once again continue to keep the 
Department of Homeland Security shut down.
  As the Presiding Officer knows, Republicans tried to negotiate with 
the Democrats in good faith. The President has sent offers to the 
Democrats to say: Look, let's be reasonable here. Open the Department 
of Homeland Security. Yet, they refuse. They cling to their love of 
illegal immigrant criminals rather than to the love of this Nation and 
the safety and security of the people here.
  This is all about safety, national strength, and national security. 
And the shutdown by the Democrats endangers each and every one of these 
as well as each and every American citizen. The next cyber attack on 
our homeland--Democrats are going to bear full responsibility. The next 
lone-wolf terrorist--Democrats will bear full responsibility. The next 
criminal who crosses the border illegally and kills an innocent 
American--fully on the Democrats. Blood will be on their hands because 
we don't have a functioning Department of Homeland Security that is 
funded with people on the ground in every position receiving their 
paychecks.
  The Democrats seem to think it is a bargaining chip. American safety 
and security is not a bargaining chip, and I am going to vote with my 
Republican colleagues today to fully fund the Department of Homeland 
Security without delay.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Sheehy). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  The Senator from Texas.


                          Trump Administration

  Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, there is an old saying that you can tell a 
lot about a person by who their friends are. It is also the case you 
can tell a lot about a person by who their friends are not, and this 
could easily be said about many within the Democratic Party at this 
time.
  It continues to amaze me the way that the widespread phenomenon of 
Trump derangement syndrome has led many Democrats to take what is so 
obviously the wrong side on almost every occasion. This pattern of 
behavior touches on matters across the policy spectrum, from refusal to 
participate in patriotic celebrations to deliberately siding with some 
of the worst human beings on the planet.
  This bizarre conduct was on full display a few weeks ago at the 
President's

[[Page S859]]

State of the Union when many Democrats couldn't even find it within 
themselves to stand up and celebrate the U.S. Olympic hockey team who 
had just won a gold medal in an epic victory against our neighborhood 
to the north.
  Very, very strange.
  But this refusal to celebrate the victory of the U.S. men's hockey 
team was not limited to the State of the Union: Somehow the Trump 
derangement syndrome has sustained an entire internet controversy 
around this group of young hockey players who should be celebrated by 
all Americans, regardless of politics.
  The fact that Democrats are incapable of checking their politics at 
the door on literally any topic speaks volumes about their mindset.
  Now, it is only common sense--and this has been something that has 
happened since Ronald Reagan first started recognizing individuals for 
their accomplishments and their patriotism in the audience at the State 
of the Union. It is only common sense that President Trump would 
recognize these Olympic athletes who won the gold medal. It shouldn't 
have been controversial, but yet thanks to Trump derangement syndrome, 
it was. But this strange behavior doesn't stop with hockey.
  We heard the same message loud and clear in January following 
Operation Absolute Resolve. President Trump pulled off an impressive 
feat, along with the incredible demonstration of professionalism and 
competence by the U.S. military, in apprehending Venezuelan dictator 
Nicolas Maduro in the dead of night, with no American lives lost in the 
operation.
  Somehow, Democrats' response was reflexively to criticize the 
President for conducting what they called a violation of international 
law. But it is astounding to me that anyone who cares about law and 
norms would side with a dictator like Maduro. And the President was, in 
fact, enforcing U.S. law, making sure that this fugitive from justice 
was called to respond in Federal court in New York to an indictment 
that was issued against him for drug smuggling.
  Maduro and his close associates conspired with the Sinaloa Cartel and 
Tren de Aragua, using their power to facilitate the flow of drugs into 
the United States and making themselves rich off of the trafficking 
profits. Maduro also gave America's enemies a foothold in the Western 
Hemisphere, including providing safe haven to Lebanese Hezbollah, 
partnering with Iran and Russia to evade U.S. sanctions, and partnering 
with China to procure military equipment and other tools used to 
repress the Venezuelan people.
  Under his rule, the Government of Venezuela rapidly devolved from a 
democracy into an authoritarian dictatorship. How is it the very people 
who claim to care about democracy and protest in the street with signs 
that say ``No Kings'' are cheering, are siding with a literal dictator 
in order to demonstrate their opposition to the democratically elected 
President of the United States just because his name happens to be 
Donald J. Trump? It makes no sense at all.
  But the leftwing outrage goes on. We saw it again last week in 
response to Operation Epic Fury. President Trump and our brave military 
servicemembers successfully eliminated another dictator who literally 
murders his own people in the streets of Tehran, the Supreme Leader of 
the Islamic Republic of Iran Ali Khamenei. Once again, the Islamic 
Republic of Iran, under his leadership, was far from a beacon of 
democracy and human rights, as I said.
  The United Nations, which is not a model of courage when it comes to 
calling out abuses, has repeatedly found that his regime engaged in 
excessive use of force, systematic torture, enforced disappearances, 
and pervasive persecution of women and young girls.
  Even the liberal bastion known as the Human Rights Watch has 
criticized his regime for persecution of religious minorities. While 
others have decried the widespread and systematic killings, 
imprisonment, and torture of civilian protesters, all this adds up to 
their status, the regime's status as the world's largest state sponsor 
of terror, funding the Houthis, Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Shia 
militias. We know the Houthis have attacked U.S. owned and operated 
ships passing through the Red Sea.
  And Hezbollah, which has been estimated to receive 70 to 80 percent 
of the funds from Iran's patronage accounts, has repeatedly set up 
criminal operations in the United States and the Western Hemisphere.
  And most significantly, Iran has long pursued nuclear weapons, 
maintaining a stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60 percent purity, 
just a step away from the 90 percent weapons-grade uranium.
  After President Trump dealt a severe setback to Iran's nuclear sites 
through Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran quickly began to rebuild these 
sites, including ballistic missile facilities. If Iran were to obtain a 
nuclear weapon, it would massively destabilize the Middle East and 
cause substantial harm to U.S. security and threaten the very existence 
of our ally Israel.
  President Trump has always been right in his long, repeated 
insistence that Iran must never--never--get a nuclear weapon. This 
world would be a safer and less violent place if the Islamic Republic 
of Iran fell tomorrow. And yet our friends across the aisle seem to 
want to side with the Iranian regime strangely.
  The Democrat Party's favorite darling, mayor Zohran Mamdani of New 
York, condemned President Trump's ``escalation'' of this ``illegal war 
of aggression.'' These are the same people that have American blood on 
their hands from the IEDs and roadside bombs that were used against our 
troops in the Middle East.
  At the same time, many of Mayor Mamdani's own residents, with 
firsthand experience of the Iranian regime, lambasted him on social 
media for his defense of the Supreme Leader. It takes a delusional 
person to sympathize with these terrible dictators who are finally 
receiving the justice they deserve under President Trump.
  But this is just the tip of the iceberg with regard to the madness 
that leftwing agitators will embrace in order to register their 
opposition to the President. As my colleagues here all know, we are 
currently in a partial government shutdown, with no path forward to 
passing appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security.
  Supposedly, this was to register their objection to immigration law 
enforcement by ICE, but this bill funds the Coast Guard. It funds the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Transportation Security 
Agency that operates at all of our airports.
  We are one natural disaster away from a very severe emergency while 
FEMA is out of money, and while none of us enjoy waiting on the line at 
airports for security, defunding the workers who perform this essential 
service to keep us safe while we travel is nothing short of absurd.
  Now, this comes on the heels of a record-long full government 
shutdown by our Democratic colleagues when so many of our essential 
workers were forced to work without pay. If Republicans pulled stunts 
like that to register their opposition to President Biden, you can only 
imagine what the media would do and say.
  It speaks volumes about where our Democratic colleagues' true 
loyalties lie when we observe whom they are willing to cheer for and 
who was met with callous indifference.
  This is not just my imagination, but Democrats are more willing to 
rally behind Nicolas Maduro and the Supreme Leader of Iran than to 
stand alongside of Republicans and show their appreciation for the U.S. 
men's hockey team.
  And they would rather sustain a government shutdown than make sure 
that the men and women who keep our airports and skies safe have the 
resources that they need. I can't understand it.
  President Trump, at the State of the Union, said these Democrats, at 
least the ones who were in the Chamber at the State of the Union, were 
crazy. Certainly, they are misguided, and they need to come to their 
senses.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. HAGERTY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                    Department of Homeland Security

  Mr. HAGERTY. Mr. President, today marks the 20th day of what has been 
a

[[Page S860]]

completely unnecessary, incredibly harmful, and politically motivated 
shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security, an Agency whose core 
is to protect our citizens from terrorism, from crime, from cyber risk, 
and from natural disasters.
  The question is, Why are we here? Why is the entire government not 
open?
  We find ourselves at this moment because my colleagues on the other 
side of the aisle oppose our efforts to clean up the immigration crisis 
that they created. This is purely about politics, not policy.
  At a moment when global tensions are high and President Trump is 
rightly carrying out a strategic operation in the Middle East to make 
America more secure, it is more important than ever to ensure that the 
Agency tasked with defending our homeland remains fully funded and 
fully operational without delay.
  The situation in Iran has direct ties to the security of our southern 
border. Think about it. More than 1,500 Iranian nationals were detained 
trying to enter this country illegally under President Biden. And do 
you know what? The Biden-Harris administration released about 50 
percent of those individuals into our homeland, many of them with 
suspected ties to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, also known 
as the IRGC. If you think about this, the open border policies of the 
Biden-Harris administration brought these 1,500 Iranian nationals, and 
750 of them were released into the interior of our homeland.
  Those are the ones that we know were apprehended. We don't even know 
how many people from Iran--or other countries that have our worst 
interest at heart--invaded during the time our border was collapsed 
under President Biden.
  There is a nonzero chance, clearly, that the feckless open border 
policies of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle let people in 
who want to do harm to America. We shouldn't sit back and just wait for 
something to happen.
  We, as U.S. Senators, should lock arm in arm and fund the hundreds of 
thousands of dedicated men and women who fight every single day to keep 
our homeland safe. From our Coast Guard and TSA officers to cyber 
security officers and natural disaster first responders, these selfless 
Americans continue to show up for work to protect our country and carry 
out their duties, all while not knowing when their next paycheck will 
arrive. They are doing their jobs, and it is more than past time for 
Congress to do ours.
  The legislation before us today is not new. It is the very same 
bipartisan agreement that this body negotiated and agreed upon just 
weeks ago. Yet, for the second time in 6 months, Democrats have chosen 
to obstruct necessary Federal funding rather than to negotiate in good 
faith.
  Therefore, I have to ask my colleagues: What exactly are we waiting 
for? Are we waiting for our adversaries to exploit this inaction? Are 
we waiting for the next natural disaster to strike a vulnerable 
community? Are we waiting for a violent extremist attack to occur?
  The American people are paying attention. The American people 
understand what is at stake.
  Supporting this bill means funding the security of our airports, 
strengthening our borders, defending our critical infrastructure, and 
ensuring our Nation is prepared to respond to natural disasters the 
moment that they occur. Weakening those capabilities, especially during 
a time of heightened global tension, is beyond unacceptable. It is 
irresponsible.
  Instead of allowing politics to undermine our national security, we 
should strengthen the various institutions that keep Americans safe. 
Ensuring the Department of Homeland Security has the resources it needs 
to properly function should be one of the most basic duties that we 
have as Members of Congress serving this Nation.
  By voting in favor of this legislation today, we have the opportunity 
to lock arms as leaders and to do the right thing. That is why I would 
strongly encourage all of my colleagues to support this bill without 
delay. Let's do what is right for the citizens and take care of this 
great Nation right here at home.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Hagerty). The Senator from Massachusetts.

                          ____________________